OEM dbcontrol 10.2.0.4 64 bit on Windows 2003 / XP 64..certificate Error

Hi
When DB Control (OEM) is launched, raise the error "Certificate Error" and provides the option
on click "Continue to this website" Login page appears with certificate error..
How / where can i find certificate or fix this problem
-Mustafa

You can click on View Certificate, then you will have the option to install the certificate. Once you install the certificate, you won't be prompted again.
Once the certificate is installed, you can check it under Internet Options/Content/Certificates/Other People tab - you will see one that's issued by your Grid Control server.
HTH

Similar Messages

Migration from Oracle 9i 32 bit to Oracle 10G 64 bit on Windows 2003 Server

I am working on migrating Oracle 9i 32 bit to Oracle 10G 64 bit on Windows 2003 from Old server to new server. We have db around 500 GB and 3 schemas. I installed Oracle 10G on new server, created tablespaces, schema's blah blah and now doing export and import at schema level from old server to new server.
Import is taking more than 4 to 5 hours on new server. My manager is saying, window time is bit longer and he wants me to try possiblities to make this process faster. Can some one help me on this, to use the best possible method to complete this process faster?
Will below step work, if I try?
If I install, oracle 9i and 10g both on new server in different home directories and take the hot backup from old machine and restore on new machine in 9i home directory and use the upgrade configuration assistant from 10g and do the upgrade? Pls advice.
Thanks in advance,
Hari babu
Edited by: user6367891 on Mar 2, 2010 5:28 AM

It looks good.
I have one question in below steps:
To migrate an Oracle9i or older database to an Oracle Database 10g Release 1 (10.1) database for 64-bit Windows:
1 Perform steps 1 - 11 in "Migrating an Oracle Database 10g Release 1 (10.1) Database".
2 Shut down the database on the 64-bit computer:
SQL> SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATE;
3 Start the database migration:
SQL> STARTUP MIGRATE;
4 Migrate the database as described in Chapter 3, "Upgrading a Database to the New Oracle Database 10g Release" in Oracle Database Upgrade Guide.
In step 4, it says, migrate database as described in chapter 3. In chapter 3, it says, to do the upgrade the process using dbca or manually. Pls confirm whether do the upgrade process after issuing startup migrate or not.
Thanks in advance.

Installing Oracle 10.1.0.2.0 (32 bit) on windows 2003 server

Hi all,
During installation of Oracle 10.1.0.2.0 (32 bit) on windows 2003 server 64 bit standard edition there is failure in Oracle Net configuration , oracle Data Base configuration Assistance.
and i saw the log file of the installtion but its very complex and saying some Unexpected error occured and showing some coding. any suggestions about this. thanks in advance.
BEST REGARDS
Edited by: user11153253 on Jan 10, 2011 11:57 PM

user11153253 wrote:
Hi all,
During installation of Oracle 10.1.0.2.0 (32 bit) on windows 2003 server 64 bit standard edition there is failure in Oracle Net configuration , oracle Data Base configuration Assistance.
and i saw the log file of the installtion but its very complex and saying some Unexpected error occured and showing some coding. any suggestions about this. thanks in advance.
BEST REGARDS
Edited by: user11153253 on Jan 10, 2011 11:57 PMYes, I would suggest you actually show us the error message. All of our crystal balls are out for repair at this time.
"My car won't start. It makes funny sounds when I try. I looked under the hood and saw a lot of complex machinery. Any suggestions on how to start my car?"

How To Migrate Databases From Windows 2003 32 bit to windows 2003 64 bit?

Hi,
How To Migrate Databases From Windows 2003 32 bit to windows 2003 64 bit?
Db Version: 10.2.0.2
Thanks,
Yusuf

Also see MOS Doc 403522.1 (How to Migrate Oracle 10.2 32bit to 10.2 64bit on Microsoft Windows)
HTH
Srini

Install Oracle DB 32-bit on Windows 2003 Server EM64T

I need to know if i can install Oracle 10.1.0.3 32 bit or 10gR2 32 bit on Windows
Standard Edition 2003 64 with Intel Xeon -64 bit?
Tks,
Elber

You must use the 64 bit edition. Only 10gR2 64bit is certified for this platform, 10gR1 was not produced for 64 bits and the 32bit edition is not supported.
From the Certify Matrix it states "Running 32-bit applications on a 64-bit operating system is generally referred to as "Compatibility-Mode" by many AMD64/EM64T hardware vendors. Irrespective of this terminology, 32-bit Oracle Database server is *not* certified on Windows x64. For the 32-bit Oracle database client, check the certification matrix for more details.".
~ Madrid
http://hrivera99.blogspot.com/

EP 6.0 on Oracle 9i 32 bit for Windows 2003 server x86_64 bit env Install

We are facing issues while performing instalations of EPortal 6.0 on Windows 2003 enterprise edition server(X64 version) on AMD 64 bit processor.We have installed 32 bit Oracle software alongwith 32 bit SAP kernel 640 dumps
We had to install oracle 9.2.0.5 32 bit ,since there is no oracle
realease for oracle 9i 64 bit ,on OS windows 2003 server X_86 64 bit,after doing this when we go ahead kenel 32 bit, we faced error during database creation phase of the NW java installation.The error logs are
as follows,
ERROR 2008-04-05 23:09:27
CJS-00084 SQL statement or script failed. DIAGNOSIS: Error message:
ORA-12546: TNS:permission denied
plz respond asap

hi sm,
this seems to be an issue with the rights of the user and the DB install. check is the TNS is up and running and that the SIDADM has fill access to it. Also , have you checked the latest PAM. why are you trying to implement EP6 right now? I would suggest to go for EP7.0
regards,
Shantanu

Oracle 9i 32 bit ON Windows 2003 server 32 bit

Hi all
I have oracle 9i 32 bit istalled on HP server with windows 2003 server 32 bit, 8GB ram.
I am trying to increase oracle memory size (SGA + PGA),
but when I exceed 2GB for (SGA + PGA) it gives me error (ORA-27102 : out of memory)
Is it because the windows 32bit ?
How to manage this issue?

The maximum amount of memory that can be allocated on a Windows Server 2003 is 4 Gb.
If you have Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, it supports 32 GB of physical RAM and Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition supports 64 Gb by means of the Physical Address Extensions (PAE) feature.
You should declare the 3 Gb switch that is in the Boot.ini file with Microsoft Windows Server 2003 so it addresses more than 2Gb. So verify which windows 2003 server edition are you currently using.
~ Madrid
http://hrivera99.blogspot.com

Oracle (64 bit) on Windows 2003 ( 64 bit )

Hi Guys,
Im trying to install Oracle Release 2 (9.2.0.2) on Windows 2003 (64 bit) , but failed. It pops up following error.
"The image file setup.exe is valid, but is for a machine type other than the current machine."
Can somebody help on this.
rgds
-ruwan

If, on the next page http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/oracle9i/htdocs/win64soft.html
you click on product certification information, you can see "Certify - Oracle's Certification Matrices".
If you choose "View Certifications by Platform", etc, and you arrive here http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html
If you choose "View Certifications by Product", etc, and you arrive here http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html, and you can read "32-bit/64-bit Information, read this http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html.
As I well understand, on EM64T, install Windows 2003 32-bits, after what you can install Oracle 9.2.0.2 64-bits.
If anybody can confirm it...
Nicolas.

64-bit OS over 32-bit on Windows 2003 ?

Hi Guru's,
We have a 60GB 10.2.0.4 Production database runs on Windows 2003 (32- bit) with 4GB RAM size
On one server we often (every15-20 days) , We receive following error
ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 1048588 bytes (joxp heap,joetstk)
We had to reboot the server at EOD.( to freeup memory at the OS level)
To fix this issue,We are planning to upgarde the current RAM size on the server from 4GB to 8GB.(with 32-bit).
But i have heard that just adding RAM on 32-bit Windows O.S. does not add performance as compared to 64-bit Windows O.S.
I am planning suggest the client to install 64-bit Windows 2003 OS on the database server.( Where i would have to install and upgarde my 10gR2 as per 64-bit)
But does it really goning to help me reslove ORA-04030 ?
Any suggetion/document /link on the same will be appreciated
Edited by: user12000301 on Aug 4, 2011 1:11 AM

ok, just to make it clear
Windows memory limits: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778
32-bit server versions of Windows can handle more than 4 GB RAM with PAE (_desktop_ versions cant)
processors support this since the good old Pentium Pro in which 36-bit addressing was introduced in 1995
however, a 32-bit process can address a maximum of 3 GB RAM with the proper flag set
so if it is the only database running on that machine, it wont profit from the more memory installed in the machine, and the way to go is to upgrade to 64-bit
we have a customer who runs some smaller databases on a Windows 2003 32-bit machine with 8 GB RAM and PAE
none of the databases (or you could say processes) need more then 3 GB memory, so there this is valid configuration

Essbase 64 bit on Windows 2003 Server: Windows Virtual cache/ Paging File ?

Hi,
the speed of our nightly calculations seems to differ from day to day between 1 and 2 hours
I am wondering, what the correct setting for the windows paging file is ?
We use Windows 2003 64 Bit Server with 16 GB RAM
We run 1 Essbase application with 80 GB pag files with 4 GB Data Cache Setting and 1 GB Indexcache Setting in EAS console - on that server is actually nothing else running in production mode (just a few essbase-test application, usually offline)
what is the recommended setting on the windows level in the windows system properties for memory usage ?
We have:
Memory Usage: Adjust for best performance of "Programs" ;
Virtual Memory/Paging file on C-Drive: Custom Size, initial Size: 10 GB, maximum size 16 GB
when system was handed over from Oracle, we had 4 GB virtual memory - however in essbase manual, you read that the recommended value should be 3-5 times the physicial ram -
for me, the cache-bevahiour is strange anyway: if I watch taskmanager, I see in the middle of our 1 hour calculation the memory usage of Esssvr.exe Service using 7 GB of RAM, then the 16 GB RAM are used up at some point (paging file is 9 GB )- then suddenly nearly all the RAM get's cleared and ESSSVR.exe memory consumption goes down to 0 and from 0 increasing again-
looks to me, as all the cache for essbase get's deleted in the miiddle of the calculation, because RAM used up for paging files ?
Can anybody explain or give a clear directions, what to check ?
our application operates normally (no abnormal termination, no generation of *.xcp files)
(Essbase is installed on the 500 GB D-Drive)

Hi John,
thanks for the helpful link - the long discussion reminded me again, that pure cores and cache is not all, what makes up a good essbase application -
I will test with calcparallel 6 (in comparison to 4) on our 64bit environment - just to see if I can achieve a 10, 20 or 30% improvement...
In addition, I must admit, that 50% of our 1-2 hour calculation is calculated in serial/ not parallel... so I expect an additional 5 to 10 min improvement, not more.
Thank you for now

Essbase 64 bit on Windows 2003 Server: recomm. Hardware for Calcparallel ?

Hi,
1 year ago, we migrated to system 9.3.1 for Hyperion Planning - as usual, this includes Workspace, Financial Reporting, Financial Analysis, SmartView, Shared Services...
everything is running well on acceptable speed and in general 2-3 times faster than our old environment- essbase 7, planning 4 on (HP DL580 G3 windows 2003 32 bit servers, with each 4 Xeon monocores @3 Ghz)
we decided 1 year ago for 3 windows servers, each with 2 Xeon quattro-cores (=8 cores @ 3.0 Ghz)
1st server Financial Reporting + Workspace (Windows Server 2003 SP2, HP Proliant BL460C G1 with 2x Quattrocore Xeon E5450 3.0 Ghz) 8 GB RAM
2nd Server Planning+Shared Services (Windows Server 2003 SP2, HP Proliant BL460C G1 with 2x Quattrocore Xeon E5450 3.0 Ghz) 4 GB RAM (8 GB would have been better)
3rd Server 64 Bit Windows 2003 with Essbase (Windows Server 64 bit SP2, HP Proliant DL380 G5 with 2x Quattrocore Xeon X5450 3.0 Ghz) 16 GB RAM
as our planning application is quiet big and we run a lot consolidation & datacopy at night, we depend on parallel calculation.
We mainly use command calcparallel 4 - but on 64 bit system, calcparallel 7 should be possible as well
We plan now to extend the system for other regions/2nd application
My Question: the new consultant confused me today, that essbase would regard 1 physicial quattrocore processor as 1 core for parallel calculation - that a machine with just 2 physical cores is not a really powerful machine... and that we better think about new hardware- that a quattrocore is just 1 core for essbase analytics - is this true ???
so did we actually choose a weak environment with only 2 (Quattro)-cores) for Essbase ?
Can anybody confirm if there is a difference for essbase between having e.g. 4 Dualcores and 2 Quattrocores ? (Besides the fact, that it will cost more, as we have to lease a bigger Server with more processor-sockets- and that it will cost a lot efforts to get the system changed)
P.S.: EAS console shows 8 cores for the Essbase Server in properties
Applicationlogfile shows: calculating in parallel with [4] threads (we use command calcparallel 4 in businessrule)
- our nightly calculations take between 60 and 120 minutes- if we avoid fragmentation (run dense restructure every 4 weeks) and keep the system clean and lean...

Hi John,
thanks for the helpful link - the long discussion reminded me again, that pure cores and cache is not all, what makes up a good essbase application -
I will test with calcparallel 6 (in comparison to 4) on our 64bit environment - just to see if I can achieve a 10, 20 or 30% improvement...
In addition, I must admit, that 50% of our 1-2 hour calculation is calculated in serial/ not parallel... so I expect an additional 5 to 10 min improvement, not more.
Thank you for now

Error in Netweaver installation with MaxDB on a 64-bit IA windows 2003

Hello all,
I am installing Netweaver CE 7.1 in Windows 2003. Out of the 35 phases , i am getting an error in the 13th phase. The name of the Phase is " Create Database Instance" . An error log is created and the details are as below :
Subprocess starts at 20091014155346
Execute Command : C:\Program Files\sdb\programs\pgm\dbmcli.exe -n SGPSRV011 -d SMD -u CONTROL,******** db_start
Execute Session Command : exit
Subprocess stops at 20091014155349
Subprocess call failedERR
-24994,ERR_RTE: Runtime environment error
1,'SMD' has stopped unexpectedly, (view 'Application Event Log') (OS error code 11000)
This is the text of the error being displayed :
An error occurred while processing service SAP NetWeaver CE Productive Edition > Installation Options > Standard System > Standard System. You may now
choose Retry to repeat the current step.
choose View Log to get more information about the error.
stop the task and continue with it later.
Log files are written to C:\Program Files/sapinst_instdir/CE71_PROD_ADA/INSTALL/ADA/STD/AS.
I feel that this error has something to do with the settings in the MaxDB database. Can you please help which setting needs to be changed ? Both the Netweaver and the MaxDB are on the same 64-bit Itanium server and the OS is Windows 2003.
Thanks and Regards
Vijay

Check your max db database build, [https://service.sap.com/pam] and apply a patch if available. Also, you may want to log a problem on SMP.

Oracle application sever 10g on 32bit and 64 bit platform windows 2003

Hello,
can any body please let me know the performance issues, differences between 32bit and 64bit of oracle application sever 10g? I heard there were some differences... where can i find the information try to look in oracle site not much help...
please help me out because we are in the process of installing the 10 application server on 32 bit platform on windows 2003.
Thanks much....

May be possible but it is probably not tested by Oracle nor is it supported as error correction support for OAS 10g has finished more than a year ago.
A good starting point is My Oracle Support Note [url https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=564174.1]564174.1, "Oracle Application Server 10g (10.1.2) Installation Requirements for Linux OEL 5 and RHEL 5". Make sure that you always use a 32-bit emulated shell (linux32 bash).
Thanks,
EJ

Oracle 9.2 64 bit for windows 2003 x64

Hi Gurus ,
We are now upgrading the server from R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0 . As per our upgrade . i need to download oracle 9.2 64 bit for our windows 2003 server X64 edition . I try to search in service market place . But i cant find oracle 9.2 64 bit for our windows 2003 server X64 edition . Kindly advice me to download .
Regards
Selvan .SP

I am not sure but its not logical.
How you can use 64bit kernel with 32bit DB.
I suggest you keep 32bit SAP, 32bit oracle 9.2 db.
Do upgradation of oracle 9.2 to 10.2 32bit.
Take offline / cold backup of 32bit 10.2 db
Install X64bit OS, 64bit SAP, 64bit Oracle Software
Restore offfline / cold backup and migrate to x64bit.
Regards,
Nikunj Thaker

Oracle 10.2.0.3 64-bit to SQL Server 2005 64-bit on Windows 2003 64-bit

I have not been successful in setting up HS ODBC to allow Oracle to connect to SQL Server with the above 64 bit editions. Is it possible in 10.2.0.3 Win 64-bit or must we use another method to connect? Any advice would be much appreciated.

The bad news at the beginning:
There is no HSODBC for Windows 64bit nor a gateway.
It is planned for 11gR2 to provide gateways for Windows 64bit.
As all 10g gateways have been desupported and you start with a new project so I would suggest you start with the supported gateways release 11g. The other advantage of 11g is we here offer a database gateway for ODBC (follow up product of HSODBC but which can now reside on its own machine and there isn't anymore the restriction it must be used with a database from the same Oracle_Home.
Not sure about your environment and operating system preferences, but you can install and 11g gateway for Windows on a 32bit Windows machine. Or if you prefer a Unix OS you can install it on this machine.
So your env lokks like the Oracle db is running on machine A, the gateway on machine B and the SQL Server on machine C.
The products we offer are DG4ODBC and DG4MSQL. The gateway for ODBC is a generic one which uses a 3rd party ODBC driver to connect to the SQL Server. We do not provide you any ODBC driver. You need to get one on your own, install it and configure it. The Gateway for SQL Server is ready to use after the configuration.
Difference between both products is the capability of the gateways. The ODBC gateway is generic and thus offers only limited capabilities. For example only a few functions are supported which results in POST PROCESSING. Post processin means, if a function is not translated to a function the remote database can understand, all records from the remote database are transferred to the Oracle database and the result is then processed locally. Depending now on the amount of data this might cause performance issues.
The gateway for SQL Se4rver is designed for SQl Server connections and thus supports a lot of functions it can map to the SQL Server syntax and no post processing is done. In addition it supports distributed transactions.

OEM dbcontrol 10.2.0.4 64 bit on Windows 2003 / XP 64..certificate Error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for