Offline preview differs from online display of Japanese text

I can't figure out why my web site in English and Japanese cannot correctly display the Japanese type when uploaded. The offline preview is fine, but the online version turns the Japanese to gibberish. I have set the charset="UTF-8" in metatags and in the javascript code.
Thinking that I may have missed a supporting file in the upload, as a test, I downloaded the entire directory and opened the file offline, but it again works fine on my desktop. The same browsers (Safari, Chrome and Firefox) used for online and offline viewing.
Why won't my Japanese text display online when the offline preview is fine ?

Have you set the correct charset on your webpage? If not try to put this within the head tags on your page:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=shift_jis">
Hope this works.

Similar Messages

JPG colors different from Lightroom Display

I am aware of issues when you try to print an image without taking into account the calibrated color profiles of both the printer and your monitor, but not when it comes to displaying 2 images on the same monitor.
To put it simple: I process an image in Lightroom. I get the desired result, create a JPG out of it.
The JPG is very different from what I had in Lightroom. Much lighter among others.
What would be a potential reason to explain such behavior?

CSS Simon wrote:
You said: "I did click "Reset all default Develop settings" and reimported the JPG. Now it does look exactly the way the original RAW image looks."
So I assume you mean "why is the jpeg displayed in another program not the same as the raw (or the jpeg, for that matter) displayed in LR?". Either the other programs aren't colour managed, or the monitor isn't correctly calibrated and profiled? See Jao vdL's post.
Indeed. Now it makes sense. What totally confused me was when the JPG, reimported in LR, did not look the same as the RAW image. I thought that if LR was color managed, then both images should look the same.
After I clicked the "Reset all default Develop settings", the reimported JPG looks "correct". Not sure I fully understand what happened however
CSS Simon wrote: To your other post: Lightroom uses ProPhoto RGB as its working space during editing, so in Develop Module the image displayed is in that colour space. In Library Module, LR displays the previews which are stored in Adobe RGB, I believe. This is true whatever the colour space of the image. This is of no consequence to the user, as LR is colour managed, and whatever working space is used internally is mapped to the monitor colour space by using the monitor profile. Provided there is a correct monitor profile, that is.
Interesting. So if my monitor is not properly calibrated, it would be possible that the image in the library module could look different from the same image in the development module? Good to know
CSS Simon wrote:
Colour management to an output device uses two profiles: the profile of the image (typically sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto RGB or usually another standard profile) and the profile of the output device (monitor or printer as appropriate). The colour-managed program uses the two profiles to map the RGB data from the image colour space to the device colour space.
Is your monitor calibrated and profiled with a hardware colorimeter (Spyder, Display One, Color Munki etc)? If not, colour displayed by different programs will not always be predictable (and will usually not be correct). Even if it is calibrated and profiled, only colour-manged programs will display the right colour. Programs that are NOT colour managed (or not properly managed) include Internet Explorer (even IE9), Chrome, most Windows components pre Windows 7 (in W7 the photo viewer is colour managed, the desktop and most other components aren't)...
Not calibrated as of now. Will fix it soon now that it seems that it is the reason behind my problem
What you are saying is consistent with what I had read, and this is actually what confused me the most. Because I read that Firefox was color-managed, but the JPG looked the same in FF, IE, Irfanview and LR (JPG reimported before I clicked the "reset settings" button). So it looked to me like if color-managed (FF) and non-color managed (IE) software would display the JPG the same way, but yet my LR RAW image would look different. When Windows Image Viewer displayed the JPG the same way LR did for the RAW, this is where I got totally lost.

Selected variable value is different from the displayed value

Hi all,
I have an issue with variable selection in portal. I have a IO - customer which is compounded to source system. So I have soem customers with the same key with different sources. And I have a variable created on customer. For ex - i have 3 customers like below.
SA/1234567
BP/1234567
F5/1234567
1 - And when I search for a customer 1234567 - I find only one customer that is SA/1234567. And IO properties are set to read all the masterdata values and not infoprovider or posted values. - thats issue one - I would like to see all the three and let the user select what ever he wants.
2 - Now when I select SA/1234567 and run the report. It shows me data for F5/1234567 - which is correct data for that customer. But in the template I have a info field web item to display the selected variables on the screen. That info field shows the Customer as BP/1234567 - which is wrong and confusing. I checked the properties of the web item and everything seems ok. So in the variable screen I get a value, the result set if of another value and the variable value that shows in the Info tab is another customer. - Driving me nuts
3 - When I recreate the same scenario in 3.x query - everything works the way they should - this only happens in 7.0 query. What am I missing here??
Any pointer or insight is appreciated - sorry for the long post.
Voodi
Edited by: voodi on Jun 8, 2010 2:26 PM

Sorry - its not how its displaying the values rather what its displaying - it misses on 2 other values from the three - though the Bex setting in IO are set to read all the values from materdata table. And in the query I'm using IO properties. And display settings are ok

Payment term in PO print preview different from PO header

We have set payment term ZI60 for vendor 2033803, but on the PO print preview it's "Payable immediately Due net" .In PO header (In delivery/invoice tab) also, it shows payment term to be ZI60...but on print preview it shows 'Payable immediately Due net' .What could be the reason?

"Payable immediately Due net" may be the description of payment term ZI60
goto to table TVZBT give ur payment term ZI60 and see the description......
i think
in the print program they have designed to display the description of payment term...if u want to display the payment term then ask ur ABAPer to change it...

Preview Differs From Final Burn

Trying to burn a dvd with chapter selection.
I preview the whole dvd before burning and it looks fine.
Test every chapter, watch the whole dvd etc. No problems. Plays how I'd like it to.
I burn it without any problems or error messages.
But, when I watch it in a regular dvd player.
Menu load and I go to play it and it starts halfway through the video.
I go to the scene selection menu and it starts from the same place.
Every scene goes right back to halfway through the movie.
The dvd won't play in the computer that I burned it on.
And when I preview the file in IDvd post burning the preview is messed up like the dvd.
Anyone else have this problem?

Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Instead of burning from iDVD use the File->Save as Disk Image menu option. That encodes the project and saves as a disk image. You can mount the disk image and play it with DVD Player. If the chapters work OK there then the problem is with the burning process. If the chapters are as they should be burn the disk image to disk with Disk Utility.
Be sure to use quality media, Verbatim-R is the most recommended brand here, and burn at the slowest speed possible.
OT

Live preview differs from IExplore

Hello all, i created a template in photoshop and opened it in dreamweaver. when i view the live, it seems to display clean and crisp. but when i try it in internet explore its seems a bit pixelated. it is not very obvious but my keen eye can tell me. i have also noticed when i draw a div box and place text in it, the preview is fine in the live preview but the div box shifts about 3 spaces to to the left in IExplore. i have not loaded a css to the file as am not experienced creating css layouts. Is there a way to fix these problems.

Upload your page and dependant files to a remote server space and post a URL, please.
FWIW Browser variation is nothing new. When you're experienced with CSS, you learn to build your sites and test them to perform well in the standards compliant browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Safari). Then use conditional comments or hacks to fix things that don't work in IE.
As for pixelation, it could be you optimized your images poorly in PShop or didn't save them correctly for the web as JPEG or PNG. But there's no way we can help you without seeing your page.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
www.alt-web.com/
www.twitter.com/altweb
www.alt-web.blogspot.com

Small book title page previews differently from layout in Aperture

I have laid out a small book and in Aperture I have:
1. The cover
2. A grey left hand page
3. A Title right hand page
4 etc - all the photos.
I've laid out some of these as double-page 1-up spreads. Looks great but the problem is when I preview it the grey left hand page right after the cover disappears, throwing everything out of sequence. This splits up the double-pagers, making the book absurd.
Any idea (a) whether Aperture or Preview correctly shows what the finished book will look like, and (b) how to bring them into line/avoid this happening again??

peter at knowhowpro wrote:
DHWachs wrote:
This post was great! Thank you so much. But I am hoping you know one more thing related to this. In the "transform" section of the definition (where the x/y coordinates are set along with height and width) there is an option called "angle". I was hoping that changing this value would allow me to offset the angle of the picture. However, if I put any value there other than 0 the template becomes unusable.
Do you happen to know what this option does?
I haven't looked into the files, so this is just a guess based on how some graphic applications work. It's common to think of rotating a shape as pivoting around a center point, but It's possible that the file sets a value for the rotation point not at the center. In some graphics applications, you can set a shape's pivot at any corner or in the middle of any side, of the rectangle that contains the whole shape.
So, your value may be rotating the shape around a pivot that moves the shape into some area that upsets the behavior of other shapes. Just a thought.
HTH
Regards,
Peter
Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices
Peter's point is a good one. I would also assume that the "angle" property allows you to rotate an image, but I haven't tried it myself. One thing to investigate - are there any page templates included in LR that have image placeholders that are at an angle (I don't recall any, off-hand)? If so, looking at the associated .lua file could provide insight into how an angled image placeholder should be described.

Japanese text display problems in applet using plugin

Hi,
We've been beating our heads against the wall on this one for quite some time, so any help would be greatly appreciated.
Our product uses a third party applet (Kavachart from Visual Engineering) to display graphical statistics from our database. We are currently localizing our product to support english and japanese. With Japanese enabled, all pages use euc-jp encoding. The problem we are running into is in the display of japanese text inside this applet in IE 5 and NS 4.7x when using the java plugin (1.3 or 1.4). If the default jre of the browsers are used, the text in the applet renders fine.
On a suggestion from the supprot folks at Visual Engineering, I modified our code to set the defaultFont parameter on the applet to "serif, 14, 1". With this set, the text in the applet renders ok in IE, but NS on windows and unix is still broken. Given that we are doing all these tests on machines running a native japanese OS, it's not even clear to me why setting the defaultFont should even be required, but at this point, I'll take anything :-)
Has anyone else run into this and either solved it or proven that a solution is not feasible? I'm at my wits end here....
Thanks in advance,
Mark Evangelisto
Synchronicity Inc.

If you are using different java plugin, you need to install the international version of the JRE; otherwise, some characters may not be able to display correctly since some of the properties files are missing.
As for Visual Engineering's suggestion. I don't know why they tell you to set the default font on the applet because it may cause the browser to use the font specified. Your applet works on IE because it will try to use the best font to match the web page's content. For NS anything less then 6.0 (technology based on Mozilla), they never display web page correctly especially if you did what VE suggest.
If you are running the applet on the native langauge OS with the international version of the JRE installed, the applet should display correctly without setting the default font. If it is not the native langauge OS, first you need to install the international version of the JRE and have the fonts that are able to display the language the applet use.

ALV GRID - Handling selected rows? Sorting in OUTTAB is different from ALV

Dear Experts ,
I have a transaction with ALV grid. I have defined several application specific functions to the ALV grid tool bar. My requirement is to handle the ALV tool bar functions only for the selected rows.
Code snippet:
DATA:
LS_GRID_DS TYPE TYS_DS.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TYS_DS.
INCLUDE   TYPE TYS_ALVGRID.
TYPES: STRUCNAME LIKE DD02L-TABNAME.
TYPES: PRETAB    TYPE ZTAB_T,
       OUTTAB    TYPE ZTAB_T,
       OUTTAB_HIDDEN TYPE ZTAB_T,
       OUTTAB_SUM TYPE ZTAB_T,
       OUTTAB_ROLLBACK TYPE ZTAB_T,
       END OF TYS_DS.
LOOP AT ls_grid_ds-marked_rows INTO ss_index_split
       WHERE rowtype IS INITIAL.
( Marked rows is correctly giving the row numbers of the highlighted rows)
READ TABLE ls_grid_ds-outtab INTO ss_sel_rows_ds_split
               INDEX ss_index_split-index.
ISSUE : Sorting in ls_grid_ds-outtab internal table is different from ALV Grid display.
Hence, though ls_grid_ds-marked_rows giving correct rows, I am not able to handle the my requirement correctly.
Why sorting in gs_grid_ds-outtab is different from ALV display? How can they made in sync?
Thank you in Advance.
Sravan.
Edited by: Raja Sravan on Jan 16, 2009 1:13 AM

Hello Raja
The OUTTAB is usually in sync with the display on the frontend grid control because it is a CHANGING parameter (of method SET_TABLE_FOR_FIRST_DISPLAY).
Question: Do you "feed" ls_grid_ds-outtab to the parameter IT_OUTTAB of method SET_TABLE_FOR_FIRST_DISPLAY?
If not then it is obvious why you get discrepancies.
Regards
Uwe

Will not display Japanese text only boxes?

how can I get it to display any Japanese text from websites with out it only showing boxes
any input would be appreciated!
The Japanese text I would love to see is
Hiragana
Katakana
Kanji

Quite honestly, I think you need to go back to Flash 10.3.183.90, a version that was kept alive specifically for WinXP users. The Flash 11 and later versions have a separate plugin container that isn't available for anything below Win Vista with feature you can't even use. I see no advantage to anything newer and on the down side the newer versions are a lot more likely to crash frequently.
First, grab the Adobe uninstaller from here:
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/uninstall-flash-player-windows.html
Then download Flash 10.3.183.90 from here - about halfway down the page:
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/archived-flash-player-versions.html
(Released 6/11/2013) Flash Player 10.3.183.90 (61.1 MB)
IMO, the best version of Flash for WinXP. Adobe kept up with security updates for 10.3 for WinXP users long after Flash 11.0 came out in 2011 for Vista and newer versions of Windows.
Run the uninstaller, then reboot your operating system.
Then you can run the Flash installer, with Firefox closed, of course.
''Note, if you still use IE, you'll need to reinstall the ActiveX version of Flash for IE. That uninstaller removes all versions of Flash that might be installed,''

Chinese and Japanese text gone in Adobe Air 4.0b and Android 4.4

Flex 4.10/11 with Adobe Air 4.0Beta on Android 4.4 does not display Chinese / Japanese text anymore in basically all components (Label, Buttons, List etc.). I need this urgently fixed. Please let me know if there is a workaround.

you can use fte to show text,i has solved it.
http://forum.starling-framework.org/topic/feathers-tlf-text-renderer
this is a tlf method based fte,too heavy,finally i use the textblockRenderer in feathers and add a html parser myself,this is url:
https://github.com/joshtynjala/feathers/blob/master/source/feathers/controls/text/TextBloc kTextRenderer.as

PS CS5 Image Display Differs From Used ICC Profile In Win 7

Hi,
on my Windows 7 Ultimate x64 machine, I just calibrated my Dell SP2309W monitor using an i1DisplayPro and basICColor 5, creating a ICC v2 profile (I am aware of the problems under Windows with ICC v4 profiles).
It created the ICC profile and applied it to be used by Windows. I double checked under COLOR MANAGEMENT that the new ICC profile is being used. Although I can see that the new ICC is being used (desktop appearance changes), there are a few issues I am experiencing:
(1.) Windows Photo Viewer
The thumbnails in Windpows Explorer look fine (they DO use the new ICC profile), when I double click a jpeg and open the image it DOES NOT use the new ICC profile. When I click the PLAY SLIDESHOW button (starting the slideshow) in the opened image in Windows Photo Viewer, the images DO use the new ICC profile.
(2.) Internet Browsers
All current internet browser (Firefox, IE, Safari and Chrome) DO use the new ICC profile and display the image correctly.
(3.) Photoshop CS 5
When I open the same image - that Windows Photo Viewer does not correctly displays (according to the new ICC profile) - in Photoshop CS5, I get the same image display that Windows Photo Viewer gives me (when not thumbnail or not in slideshow mode) - it appears to be the sRGB display.
My color settings in PS CS5 are: North America General Purpose 2 > sRGB IEC 61966-2.1.
When I go to View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB I get the image display using the new ICC profile.
Why does the image look different in PS than my calibrated monitor should output ?
I was under the impression (please correct me if I am wrong), that the sole purpose for calibrating my monitor was to get a uniform display across (ICC aware) applications. Even when one applies different color spaces to a document in PS, I thought the output on my calibrated screen done by the graphic card should always be according to my calibration and the settings in the ICC profile being used.
What Am I doing wrong or what am I misunderstanding ?
Any help or input is appreciated !
Thanks.
- M

Hello,
A note on monitor calibration: calibrating your monitor will not guarentee that every application will display color correctly, it's more of a step along the pipeline, and for the preview part of a color workflow it's the last step. Here's how color translation follows for an ICC workflow when previewing to a monitor:
Image Color Numbers > Document Tag or Workspace Profile > Monitor Profile
For non-color managed applications, if the original document is or isn't tagged with a color profile it will be translated directly to the monitor profile anyway. This is the equivalent in Photoshop of selecting "Monitor" in soft proofing. Selecting monitor in softproofing will bypass the tagged or workspace profile to translate colors directly through the monitor profile.
For most automatic color managed applications (like Firefox), the image will be translated through the tagged profile and then sent through the monitor profile. If the image is untagged or the profile is unrecognized, the colors get sent directly to the monitor profile.
For Photoshop, a tagged document will have its profile respected and then sent to the monitor. An untagged document will be assigned the workspace profile, which acts like a temporary document profile, and then gets sent to the monitor. This is often why users will notice Photoshop behaves differently from other applications. It's usually a case of the workspace coming into play. By default the workspace profile is set to sRGB. You can change this in Edit > Color Settings.
The purpose of the workspace is originally for printing workflows, as a way of keeping consistant color translations when dealing with both tagged and untagged documents. For web output workflows it can be useful for viewing everything through sRGB, which is typical of the average monitor output (not so with newer wide-gamut monitors, another source of confusion...) combined with the fact that originally most web browsers were not color managed. Hence viewing everything through sRGB is pretty close to what most monitors see and what untagged/unmanaged docs will look like.
Monitor calibration is useful only because it brings your monitor output to a "known state". In traditional workflows the monitor was always a middle-man, a preview device which was useful for getting an idea of what the printed output would look like before you print it. Since print colorspaces are often smaller than display spaces, it's feasible and useful to narrow down the monitor/display space and calibrate it to a known state, so that even if it doesn't totally match the print, you'll get used to its differences/limitations and they'll be consistent so long as the calibration is maintained.
For web output, your final output is often another user's computer monitor, which can have any form of behavior (most standard monitors are pretty close to sRGB, or use sRGB as an operating system workspace (default monitor profile). Wide gamuts behave differently, but I'm not sure if there's a particular ICC space that they closely match, or if different wide-gamuts are even that close to each other in their display color spaces.
Hope this helps!

Image previews different in Aperture from other applications

I've just come across a problem with Aperture after importing a TIF image (usually I stick with RAW). The preview in AP3 looks different from that in all other photo applications I have. I looked at the same image in Preview, Lightroom 2 and iPhoto. In all 3 cases the on-screen preview was the same.
When viewed in AP3 the image is noticeably different - Onscreen Proofing is off.
To show what i'm seeing I've uploaded a screen capture of the image open in Preview and Aperture:
http://www.mark-connell.com/Photography/Testing/screen-capture/880283357_DkDaM-X 3.jpg
Is this a known issue with AP3.0.3 because it kind of makes it unusable as an image editor.
Mark

Add Lightroom 3beta2, Photoshop CS4, Bridge CS4 and LightZone to the list of applications that all display this image the same.
Am I really the only person seeing this?
Mark

How to display Japanese text from an XML file

Hiya,
I have various adapted mp3 players [called playlists on my site] which retrieve the songs and song titles/artists from an XML file. One of them plays Japanese music.
Most of the tracks are in English but I now have a couple of songs with Japanese titles and file names which I can't get to preview/display in Flash Pro CS5 [Mac]. I can type static Japanese text and it displays fine but Flash seems to be having a problem with the Japanese from the XML file.
Though I can find the English titles, etc, it would be nice if there were a way to display Japanese text from a 'multi-lingual' [English and Japanese] XML file [probably something really easy].
Thanks a bunch.
steve

This should help you:
http://http://www.packtpub.com/article/working-with-xml-in-flex3-and-java-1http://www.packtpub.com/article/working-with-xml-in-flex3-and-java-1

Does Closed Captioning display differently from one Player/TV to another?

Hi Everyone,
We just completed our first project at our facility that involved Closed Captioning from an .SCC file produced by CPC and when we preview a DVD Test of the project, the captions are not displaying as expected. We received a VHS preview copy which display the captions fine, but when we look at the DVD Test in the Apple DVD Player, the captions are not justified in a consistant manner, and sometimes a couple appear as if they were haphazardly placed on the screen.
Is possible that Captioning as how it is interpreted/displayed might vary from one TV or DVD Player to another?
Any help or comments would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance, everyone.
Regards,
-James-

UPDATE:
So far I've tested the DVD created with Closed Captions from the *.scc file, and my findings are that the PC software I've tested in closely match that of the VHS open-caption dub that the captioning company provided us. I have tried the VLC Player on the Mac, but have not had success in enabling the captions, nor been able to find any posts on the VLC support forum.
I've also been successful at finding and testing a DVD Player that can display the captions on the DVD, and find that they play similarly to that on both the VHS open-caption an PC Playback, but the position on the screen is slightly different.
Does anyone have any other experience with Closed Captioning that could either offer insight to the working theory that each TV/DVD Player/Computer DVD Software platform interprets closed captions differently from one another?
Regards and thanks in advance,
-James-

Offline preview differs from online display of Japanese text

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for