Oh-hand and item Search

Hi,
We are getting different value for quantity onhand when I check the onhand quantity on the item search screen. This problem is seen for couple of items now.
Can anyone tell the reason why?
Thanks,
Prasad

don't undestand the problme. If there are issues then quantity will be different?

Similar Messages

Find and item Search not working inside custom list in sharepoint 2013

HI,
In Sharepoint 2013 , i configured the Search. it is working in home page search Box and Find item search box inside custom list as well But one particualr custom list Find an item is not working. Any clue ?Thanks in Advance
Thanks
sanjay pradhan

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is “find an item” search box in a custom list not work in your environment.
As search box and “find an item” search box in your home page are working, so the search service application is working.
Do you have any customzation to the particular custom list ?
If No, I suggest you can full crawl the data in Central Administration ->Manage Service Application->” Search Service Application”-> Manage Content Sources” to test if it works.
Also, please check if you have set "Allow items from this list to appear in search results" in list settings->Advanced Setting to true
Best Regards
Jerry Guo
TechNet Community Support

'Find an Item' search on list with more items than view limit

Hello all
The 'Find and Item' search on a list with more items than the view limit appears to filter results according to where you are in that list. So if I search on the allitems page displaying items 1-100 I get hits from the entire list. But if I arrow
through to view items 201-300 and repeat the same search only items from 201 to the end of the list are returned
I'm assuming this is not how it should work i.e. it should always return results from the whole list. Is there a way to make that so (other than increasing the view limit to something huge so that all items are always displayed)
Many Thanks
Dan

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that Find an item Search box in List didn't returned any results.
The problem is due to a difference between the Content Source defined for the crawl and the default zone defined in the Alternate Access mapping.
You need to change the Alternate Access Mapping configuration.
For more information, you can refer to:
http://blog.jonathanroussel.com/2009/01/sharepoint-search-using-this-site-or.html
http://blog.dafran.ca/post/2011/07/02/SharePoint-does-not-return-any-search-results.aspx
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Problem in using quick and advanced search based on transient items

Hi everybody
I want to have an unbound string item in my form and allow users to use advanced search and quick search on that item.
I read the following post About advanced search and added a transient
item on view object and overrode the advance search method in application module and realized that the value of that string was
added to arguments.
Then I decided to add this transient item on entity object instead of view object so that we were able to add the item in one place and
use it in several view objects. I added an item in the entity and unchecked the persistent flag but I can't set queryable flag since it was disable.
I added the item in the view object and by use of application definition I forced the item to be shown in the advance search.
I generate the application and the item was shown correctly in the advanced search but when I set the item in advanced search its value
was not sent to advance search method.
Is it a bug ? (value of the field in the advanced search section was not sent to advanced search method )
Is it a way to add a queryable transient item in the entity object and still benefit from overriding advanced search method ?
I am using Jdeveloper 10.1.3 and Jheadstart 10.1.3.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best Regards
Navid

Navid,
JHeadstart checks whether the attribute definition is queryable before adding it to the list of advanced search attributes. A transient VO attribute can still be set to queryable, for a transient EO attribute this is not possible. We will remove this check on queryability in the upcoming patch release, since you have a valid use case. For now, you can subclass JhsSearchBean and override method createArgumentListForAdvancedSearch and comment out the check for "def.isQueryable()".
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Content Search and 'Items Matching a Tag' Web Part Not Displaying Results Shown in Preview

Hi
I've been trying to set up both the Content Search and Items Matching a Tag Web Parts with the same issue. In both cases I can create a query which displays the expected results in the Search Result Preview pane but no results are returned when browsing
the page.
I'm a Site Collection administrator
tried viewing the page in IE8, Chrome and Firefox
another user account with Full Control permissions on the site results in the same issue
I've reindexed the site (which has completed as other alterations on the content are now being returned in the normal search results)
I've tried removing and re-adding the offending web parts
The queries in both web parts are pushed back to the most simple possible - ie all documents in the current site collection for the Content Search query and 'Current site collection + Don't restrict by any tag' in the Items Matching a Tag
I haven't touched the display templates or made any other alterations AT ALL - this is a virgin site collection beyond documents in a library
Does anyone have any ideas?

I was able to make this do what I needed it to.

SharePoint search using Term-IDs doesn't work as expected for various document types and items

If items or documents are tagged with managed metadata terms from the term store (no social tags, but pre-defined terms), you can find this content later on (after crawler has finished) using the following URL query:
http://myserver/search/Pages/results.aspx?k="85f915a2-bd9e-4c94-a840-4323d37e8df9"
The guid is the term ID (from the term store).
Issue:
That works great for office documents. It seems to be not working for several file types like txt, zip, aspx (inside page libraries) etc. All file types are generally registered with search crawler and are found correctly using the normal search, e.g. for
the term name or other content. It also not works for me with custom lists that are tagged with a term.
Questions:
1. Is using this type of search url a documented and advised feature, to find content that is tagged with terms?
2. How to setup search to find this items and documents consistently with "normal" search AND by term ID?
Thanks, Frank
Thanks, SharePointFrank http://www.layer2.de/en/products/

Hello Frank,
SharePoint contents tagged with managed metadata Terms can be searched by doing a search on “TermName”, and the search result could be refined by managed metadata. Please ensure your SharePoint site content source was crawled and Managed Metadata
Service Application was running. Personally, using a TermID involved in the URL to search items tagged with metadata isn’t advisable due to difficulties when manipulating a ID number.
Fabian Williams has included a managed metadata search section in his informative walk through:
http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/
Let me know if I misunderstand you.
Thanks & Regards.
Lily Wu || Microsoft Online Community Support Engineer || SharePoint

On-hand & Item Search

Hi,
We are getting different value for quantity onhand when I check the onhand quantity on the item search screen. This problem is seen for couple of items now.
Can anyone tell the reason why?
Thanks,
Prasad

Do you mean the onhand quantity screen displays different value everytime you query for an item.
Check material transactions for that item, possibly some transaction is happening on the item which is causing change in the quantity.
http://sureshvaishya.blogspot.com

How to create a Windows 8.1 Desktop icon from the Metro/Start and/or Search Tool?

I'm a Desktop user, but often find myself needing to go to the Metro/Start and Search Tool to find programs and App(let)s in order to run them. However, after doing this several times for many programs, I find myself wanting to create
Desktop icons to run the programs more easily. Is there a way to do this from the Metro/Start Icon and/or Search Tool results?
If not, Microsoft, please consider adding the ability to do this.
It would be very nice if this ability supported all of the icon types shown in the Metro/Start, Search Tool, and Control Panel interfaces, e.g.: Metro Apps, Desktop Programs, Charms, and Control Panel Applets.
Currently, there is a way to pin the Metro/Start Icon to the Desktop, but the Taskbar will get very cluttered with even only a handful icons.
It would be very nice if the desktop icon created by this also supported the context options that the program/app(let) now shows as Tasks when the icon is pinned to the Desktop Taskbar.
Additionally, it would be nice if I could also simply drag a Pinned Taskbar icon onto the Desktop area, again, retaining it's Tasks as context menu options when the Desktop Taskbar icon is right clicked.
This ability would be very helpful for people needing to get to programs and App(let)s, without having to resort the Metro/Start and Search Tool, because when there are a lot of Metro/Start icons, I have well over a hundred icons, it
can be very hard to find one simply eye-balling lot. The Search feature is much better, provided I know the name to look for and can remember it.
Finally, this ability would be very helpful, because the kinds of desktop shortcut icons that I can create using the New Shortcut option, assuming that can I find the program/App(let)'s name and path information, do not support the context options
that the icons could in Windows 7 when an icon is created while installing the program.
Thanks,
Howard Brown
hrb

Hi Howard Brown,
Thanks for your suggestions about Windows user experience. Actually, we are glad to hear more feedback
about Windows operating system so that we can improve Windows to make it be more easier to
use.
As a suggestion for your current situation, you can use Windows Charm Bar to search Apps, it is also easy to use.
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Is there a way to view current playlist during airplay to apple TV and perhaps search and add to queue? So there are no interruptions between videos?

We are having a karaoke night and have all the songs as videos in iTunes, would be great to select the item and edit the current playlist.
so we have a seamless transition to the next abba video
Is this possible? Perhaps there are other products / apph able to suppor this?
Thanks
CM

No, Apple very rarely make advance announcements of bug fixes.
You can restore much of the look & feel of the previous version with these shortcuts:
Ctrl-B to turn on the menu bar.
Ctrl-S to turn on the sidebar.
Ctrl-/ to turn on the status bar.
Click the magnifying glass top right and untick Search Entire Library for the old search behavior.
Alternatively you roll back to iTunes 10.7. If so, first download a copy of the 32 bit installer or 64 bit installer as appropriate, uninstall iTunes and supporting software, i.e. Apple Application Support & Apple Mobile Device Support. Reboot. Restore the pre-upgrade version of your library database as per the diagram below, then install iTunes 10.7.
See iTunes Folder Watch for a tool to scan the media folder and catch up with any changes made since the backup file was created.
You might also want to use iTunes Feedback.
tt2

How can I restore the search bar drop down list and current search engine icon as it was in FF version 33?

Is there a way to restore the search bar from version 33?
I like seeing which search engine I have selected and the ability to change it with a drop down list BEFORE I highlight text, right-click, and select ' Search Google for "xxxx" '
Any way to roll back this latest "improvement"?

If you miss being able to switch search engines without going
crazy with menus, try this out;
'''[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/context-search/ Context Search]''' {web link}
Expands the context menu's 'Search for' item into a list of
installed search engines, allowing you to choose the engine
you want to use for each search.

How to header and item data of sales order using bapi interface

hi friends,
   i am geetha, i having a problem like how to upload sales oder header and item data through va01 tcode using BAPI FUNCTION MODULES.
i need bapi function modules for header adn item data and brief explation on that , how to pass importing and tables parameters to get exact output .
regards
geetha.

Use : BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2
Sales order: Create Sales Order
Functionality
You can use this method to create sales orders.
You must enter at least sales order header data (via ORDER_HEADER_IN structure) and partner data (via the ORDER_PARTNERS table) as input parameters.
Enter the item data via the ORDER_ITEMS_IN table. You can allocate item numbers manually, by filling in the relevant fields, or the system does it, according to the settings for Customizing, by leaving the relevant fields blank.
If you have configurable items, you must enter the configuration data in the ORDER_CFGS_REF, ORDER_CFGS_INST, ORDER_CFGS_PART_OF and ORDER_CFGS_VALUE tables.
Credit cards can be transferred via the BAPICCARD structure, on the one hand, data for card identification, on the other, data for a transaction which has taken place in an external system.
Once you have created the sales order successfully, you will receive the document number (SALESDOCUMENT field). Any errors that may occur will be announced via the RETURN parameter.
If no sales area has been created in the sales order header, then the system creates the sales area from the sold-to party or ship-to party, who has been entered in the partner table. If a clear sales area cannot be created, you will receive a system message, and the sales order will not be created.
Notes
1. Mandatory entries:
ORDER_HEADER_IN : DOC_TYPE     Sales document type
                   SALES_ORG    Sales organization
                   DISTR_CHAN   Distribution channel
                   DIVISION     Division
ORDER_PARTNERS..: PARTN_ROLE   Partner role, SP sold-to party
                   PARTN_NUMB   Customer number
ORDER_ITEMS_IN..: MATERIAL     Material number
2. Ship-to party:
If no ship-to party is entered, use the following: Ship-to party =
sold-to party.
3. Commit control:
The BAPI does not have a database commit. This means that the relevant application must leave the commit, in order that can be carried out on on the database. The BAPI BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT is available for this.
4. German key words:
The following key words must be entered in German, independantly of
the logon language:
DOC_TYPE     Sales document type, for example: TA for standard order
PARTN_ROLE   Partner role, for example: WE for ship-to party
Further information
You can find further information in the OSS. The note 93091 contains general information on the BAPIs in SD.
Parameters
SALESDOCUMENTIN
ORDER_HEADER_IN
ORDER_HEADER_INX
SENDER
BINARY_RELATIONSHIPTYPE
INT_NUMBER_ASSIGNMENT
BEHAVE_WHEN_ERROR
LOGIC_SWITCH
TESTRUN
CONVERT
SALESDOCUMENT
RETURN
ORDER_ITEMS_IN
ORDER_ITEMS_INX
ORDER_PARTNERS
ORDER_SCHEDULES_IN
ORDER_SCHEDULES_INX
ORDER_CONDITIONS_IN
ORDER_CONDITIONS_INX
ORDER_CFGS_REF
ORDER_CFGS_INST
ORDER_CFGS_PART_OF
ORDER_CFGS_VALUE
ORDER_CFGS_BLOB
ORDER_CFGS_VK
ORDER_CFGS_REFINST
ORDER_CCARD
ORDER_TEXT
ORDER_KEYS
EXTENSIONIN
PARTNERADDRESSES
Exceptions
Function Group
2032

Search Suggestions and Past Searches are not prolific as it is used to be.

In the latest version of Firefox, the search suggestions and the search history are only a few items. There used to be a scroll bar and also a separator to distinguish between our past searches and google search suggestions. There seems to be a change in the search box. Is this permanent - and any nice search box or a toolbar to replace it?

Hi - Yes, that returned the old search bar, thank you. But when I enter a keyword again, the past search tips and keyword suggestions are not as much as it used to be - there is no scroll bar and a few keywords (around 10). Is there any reason for this? I guess this is irreversible as that changed in the new version of the Firefox?

VA01 and VA02 Search Help Mitigation

Hello Everyone,
I need to restric several search help results to users without authorization to see these values. All these search helps are in transactions VA01, VA02, and VA03. And that is my problem, since they are SAP Standard transactions I can't just modify the way these Search Helps are handle directly.
I did try looking for Search Help Exits or some other Enhancement point where I could place my code and manipulate the Search Helps Information, but I couldn't find something that could help me. If you could please let me know if you know a way to do this, the Search Helps are:
1. Restrict all the searches available in the account assignment tab at the header and item level of the sales order which allow access to view WBS information and projects. Search Help COBL_EX_PRPM.
2. Restrict the plant search that is within the engine model field at the header level of the sales order which that provide access to view the plants names and addresses. Search Help H_T001W_C.
3. Restrict all the sales group searches within the transaction. Search Help H_TVBVK.
4. Restrict all the sales office group searches within the transaction. Search Help H_TVKBZ.
5. Restrict all the product hierarchy searches within the transaction. I think the Search Help is PRODH.
Thanks in advance,
Carlos.
Edited by: SapFigue on Feb 10, 2010 7:06 PM

Please tell how did you do it. Because i have the same problem. I need to add extra field in the search help of the ORDER in SALES ORDER (VA01, VA02). I want to see both the ORDER and the DESCRIPTION in the search help of ORDER field.

How can we revise the pricing both at header and item level of sales order?

Dear All,
Now there's one issue of the pricing to me. i want to revise the pricing both at header and item level of sales order. but after i finished the cutomize and tested it, it's more different as i thought. i found that the pricing can revise at the one side only,for example, if i revise the pricing at item level and it's grey and can't be revised at the header. on the other hand, it's the same result what's happened at item.
So, in my opinion, we can't revise the pricing both at header and item, right? if not, please give me more advices and teach me how to solve the problem. thanks a lot.

Dear Lakshmipathi,
Thanks a lot for your kindly and useful answer for me and I learn more for the pricing technology.
I didn't notice the way that you reminded ago therefore I also saw the button at the condition tab. And your suggestion makes me know more.
And I had tested the way that you said, I met with a question. Below is my opinion for my testing.
I had created one SO and the pricing was $10, then I revised the pricing from 10 to 15 by VK11. It can't be updated automatically at SO and I must update it manually by clicking the "Update" button. This is OK for my testing, but I have another question to disturb you for the use of "Active" button. When I click the button and nothing is responsed, it's quite different what you said. So, please give more detail for the Active button. Thanks a lot.

Difference between header and item movement types in MIGO

Dear all,
what is the difference between movement type entered in header of MIGO and item level?
not all movements are possible in header. how it is controlled? may not be in OMJJ
thanks and regards
gajanan

Hi Gajanan,
Movement types in Standard SAP are predefined. You can also create a new movement type, but generally it is not required.
In MIGO ,movement types on right hand side corner changes as per the transaction your are carrying out in header level like
Good reciept, Good issue, , Cancellation, subsequent adjustment, Remove from storage, placer in storage etc.....
As you go for transaction and make allocation in the allocation field, the movement type changes.
Regards,
Tushar Patankar

Oh-hand and item Search

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for