OIM 9.1.0.2 - Report issue

Hi Gurus,
IHAC who have reported that after running reconciliation archiving operation one of their reports stopped to properly work.
The report is the Rogue Account by Resource. I guess the records for generating that report are in the RCX table.
Before running archive, the customer was able to generate the Rogue Account by Resource report.
After running archive, the customer was not able to see those records anymore (even though those records are in the RCX table). He is able to generate the report, but only new records.
The customer realized that the procedure 'XL_SP_RogueAccountsByResource' runs a query. It seems that the query check for RCE table's data. But this table is clean because of Recon archive.
Is that behavior correct? Should not the reports display all the records from the RCX table?
I would appreciate any help.
TiA,

You forgot a colon. Try:
jdbc:oracle:thin:@poc.sw.com:1521:orcl
-Kevin

Similar Messages

Stage Analysis Report Issue

Hi,
I have run a stage analysis report but it says no data inspite of open opportunities being present in the system. Could anyone kindly let me know what could be the issue?
Regards
Sharat

Hi Sharat,
Welcome you to the forum. Please close your first thread.
Regarding your Stage Analysis Report Issue, what selection has been made? This report show closed opportunity only.
Thanks,
Gordon

GR/IR GL Reporting Issue

1. 30 documents of 2009 were matching and post with clear is perfomred. After performing post with clear also the line items are not moving from open line items. When we download the open line items as of today, these line items are appearing.
2. When we download the ZBLRFIOI report for GRIR a/c 349100 to have the opne line items. we have some set of documents showing as " FI Open items without J2" - This is reporting issues.
Thanks
Mallikarjuna

Hi
Pls try with F.13 for that GR/IR account 349100 by selecting check box select gl accounts
And give Company code, year and pending document numbers in selection screen
And before that pls make sure that OB74 clearing settings maintained or not
It will clear all the open items exists
Reg
Vishnu

BW Reporting Issue

Hi,
I am facing one reporting Issue relating to Display Attributes.
Characteristic: Business Partner
Display Attributes: Address0, Address1, Address3...etc.
Requirement is to display mentioned Display attributes along with Business Partner.
For this I have selected Business Partner as characteristic and mentioned above three as display attributes to Business Partner.
But Query out put is not showing Display attributes. For this I have done all settings at reporting level, all gone vain.
I am using Bex 7.0.
Kindly look in to the Issue and let me know the solution.
Regards,
Venkat.Mahipathi.
09886652422.
[email protected]

Hi,
Check in Reporting properties or check attributes in analyzer proprties then it will display
************asign points if usefull***********
swapna

User report issues in 1.1.0.21.97

A couple of issues i'm experiencing with user reports on Mac OS X in the latest pre-releas build
first off, if I am asked for a password (first time I use the connection) there is no feedback if the connection fails (worng password for instance)
The second problem I'm facing is every time I try to rerun a certain master-detail report I'm getting an NPE
this is the stacktrace:
22-nov-2006 15:37:31 oracle.report.addin.ReportEditor updateContent
INFO: ReportEditor.updateContent()
22-nov-2006 15:37:33 oracle.dbtools.raptor.controls.display.DisplayResultTable getUI
INFO: DisplayResultTable.getUI()
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.NullPointerException
at oracle.dbtools.raptor.controls.display.DisplayPanel.refresh(Unknown Source)
at oracle.dbtools.raptor.controls.display.DisplayPanel.refresh(Unknown Source)
at oracle.report.addin.ReportEditor$1.actionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1882)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2202)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:420)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(DefaultButtonModel.java:258)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicButtonListener.mouseReleased(BasicButtonListener.java:234)
at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.mouseReleased(AWTEventMulticaster.java:231)
at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:5554)
at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(JComponent.java:3126)
at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:5319)
at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2010)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4021)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2068)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3869)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Container.java:4256)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Container.java:3936)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Container.java:3866)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2054)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:1774)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3869)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:463)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:269)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:190)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:184)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:176)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:110)
reloadBuffers(): 53 nodes checked in 0.006489 second(s)
reloadBuffers(): 53 nodes checked in 0.005422 second(s)
reloadBuffers(): 53 nodes checked in 0.004306 second(s)
22-nov-2006 15:43:17 oracle.report.addin.ReportEditor updateContent
INFO: ReportEditor.updateContent()
only happens with master-detail report
Message was edited by: Barsema
barsema

We have verified the connection error on the latest evaluation build is working as expected. i.e. if you supply wrong password you get alerted to that. This has been verified on the windows and Mac OS X. Please try the latest evaluation release 1.1.0.22.71.
Your reports issue has also been addressed.
Sue

RESOLVED : Windows Phone – Download reporting issue related to 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 data

Update 3/22 - the below issue has been resolved.
It has come to our attention that certain Windows Phone download reporting aggregations are not matching. After investigation, we found an issue related to 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 transactions. For example, if you chose an “All
app” aggregation (6 month view) and compared it to “Monthly by app” aggregations (6 month view), the totals weren’t matching. The root cause of the issue was due to the 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 data not being considered for all of the available aggregations.
We are scheduled to fix the issue today.
If you have transactions between 11/1/14 – 11/9/14, you will see an increase in the following aggregation totals once the fix is completed:
Monthly aggregations (6 and 12 month views) by app and in-app aggregations
Cumulative downloads – app and in-app aggregations
Please note, this is strictly a download reporting issue. There is no impact to any payout reporting or payout amounts.
When the fix has been completed, I will update this post.
Thanks,
Patrick

Update 3/22 - the below issue has been resolved.
It has come to our attention that certain Windows Phone download reporting aggregations are not matching. After investigation, we found an issue related to 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 transactions. For example, if you chose an “All
app” aggregation (6 month view) and compared it to “Monthly by app” aggregations (6 month view), the totals weren’t matching. The root cause of the issue was due to the 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 data not being considered for all of the available aggregations.
We are scheduled to fix the issue today.
If you have transactions between 11/1/14 – 11/9/14, you will see an increase in the following aggregation totals once the fix is completed:
Monthly aggregations (6 and 12 month views) by app and in-app aggregations
Cumulative downloads – app and in-app aggregations
Please note, this is strictly a download reporting issue. There is no impact to any payout reporting or payout amounts.
When the fix has been completed, I will update this post.
Thanks,
Patrick

Odd Reporting Issue (ENTERPRISE)

I have a client with some users experiencing a rather odd reporting issue. The report runs fine, but only shows values for the totals and not the line items that make up the total.
For example, when I run the report (logged in as admin as well as under their ID), I see:
Net Sales 1,234
Cost Of Sales (1,111)
Gross Margin 123
When they log in on their machine, they see:
Net Sales
Cost Of Sales
Gross Margin 123
Very odd. I figured maybe it was an application setting, but the INI didn't look off anywhere particular.
They are running Enterprise 6.3.1 (yeah, insert comment here on the upgrade needed).
Any thoughts???

Check their Effective rights, and reset them, that has worked out for me. Otherwise, try copying the user and paste it as a new user and retest; I had to delete users and recreate them to correct problems of this nature.

OIM 9.1.0.2 - Interface issues

Gurus,
I'm facing a strange behavior in OIM interface.
When provisioning a user to a target (it's a custom connector) the task,
which is in pending status, shows a (***********) in the notes information.
If I add a note, through OIM interface, to the task it still shows the
I have a java code which programatically add notes to pending or
rejected tasks.
Even though the task shows: (***********).
If I select the SCH table (SCH_NOTE column) it shows the correct added
notes.
If I get the "Process Instance.Task Details.Note" String in the java
program it shows the correct added notes.
Has anybody seen this behavior before?
I have 2 instances of this custom connector and only one shows this
behavior.
TiA,
Carlos

Hi Gurus,
Regarding to issue reported above, I have found the bug 7590135 (https://bug.oraclecorp.com/pls/bug/webbug_edit.edit_info_top?rptno=7590135 ).
For that bug, as informed in the bug below, there was released a fix in the 9.1.0.2 BP 01.
In that bug there is the following information:
@ We need to add following property in 9101BP01 release document to fix this
@ issue.
@ <store>
@ <Note>
@ <SpecialField>true</SpecialField>
@ </Note>
@ </store>
@ true : to show the decrypted value for password field
@ false : to show blank value for password field
By the code below is possible to verify the status of the attribute:
tcProvisioningOperationsIntf taskOperations = (tcProvisioningOperationsIntf) this.getUtilityOperations("Thor.API.Operations.tcProvisioningOperationsIntf");
Map<String, String> filtro = new HashMap<String, String>();
//filtro.put("Objects.Name", "Sistema Atlys");
//filtro.put("Objects.Name", "Sistema PP");
statusFiltro[0] = "Pending";
tcResultSet tarefas = taskOperations.findAllOpenProvisioningTasks(filtro, statusFiltro);
for(int i=0; i<tarefas.getRowCount(); i++)
     tarefas.goToRow(i);
     long tKey = tarefas.getLongValue("Process Instance.Task Details.Key");
     System.out.println("isTaskNoteEncrypted: [" + this.taskOperations.isTaskNoteEncrypted(tKey) + "]");
RESULTS:
- "Sistema Atlys" resultado: "isTaskNoteEncrypted: [true]"
- "Sistema PP" resultado: "isTaskNoteEncrypted: [false]"
Can I consider that bug the same I have faced?
And the problem now is, How can I configure the Note to be displaying not encrypted results? Is this a system property (OIM)??
Regards,
Edited by: user12295533 on 23/05/2011 13:21

Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

Hello Friends
I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
(Delivery completed).
We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
following:
DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM      DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
650000001       10     UB        X
650000001       20     UB        X
650000001       30     UB
650000001       40     UB
When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
system.
Any help is appreciated in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
sampath

Hi Priya and Reddy
   Thanks for your response.
                     Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                    I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                   In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
    41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---
    42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
    43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
    44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
(Here --- means blank)
Thanks and Regards
sampath

S_ALR_87012178 Report -Issue Related to Interest calculations

Hi,
When we run a customer open item analysis S_ALR-87012178 we see that there looks to be interest for overdue balances showing on the report. It doesn't appear to be assigning the interst to the customer, but I wanted to see why this was here and if we have the ability to assing interest to balances. And also where you would turn this on and off in the system or for a customer.
Kindly adivce me on this issue.i am confused because i didnot understand what they are asking.
Thanks
Sunitha

Hi,
You can go to F.99 in order to see all the reports for Customers.
Hope you will find the best suitable report.
When you are using "Drill down reports" do not forget to select
"Object list (more than one lead column)" this would give you a option to sort them the line items as you want.
Just for your information: SAP1 is the transaction code for all the reports in SAP.
Regards,
Ravi

Report issue on Virtual cube with services

Hi,
I'm following a how-to document to report on a virtual cube using a custom function module and everything seems to be OK except it is dumping at the following line which is included in the How To document "How Tou2026Implement a virtual InfoProvider with Services".
Both <l_s_data> and E_T_DATA are of same data types as discussed in the how-to document.
append <l_s_data> to E_T_DATA
These are the declarations which are same as HowTo document
E_T_DATA TYPE STANDARD TABLE
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <l_s_data> TYPE ANY.
Did any one face this issue. Greatly appreciate any insight into this issue. We are on BW 3.0B.
the dump i'm getting is ...
Data objects in a Unicode program are not convertible.
Error analysis
The statement    "MOVE src TO dst"   requires the operands "dst" and "src" to be comvertible.
Since this statement occurs in a Unicode program, the special convertibility rules for Unicode programs apply.
Thanks,
Hari Immadi
http://immadi.com
SEM BW Analyst

Hi,
In the debugging this is what I found out.. Any further insight?
Virtual cube has only 1 characteristic Z_CRNUM & only 1 keyfigure Z_SR
Report has only Z_CRNUM & Z_SR
<L_S_DATA> has following record & value
component      type     length     contents
K____504     P     9     1.000
S____504     C     18     16EA4D-R
K____504 is the technical name of Z_SR in virtual provider.
S____504 is the technical name of Z_CRNUM in virtual provider.
E_T_DATA (type standard table) has following structure with a total of 5 fields.
S____504    K____504           &KEYEND 1ROWCOUNT   Z_SR
Regards
Hari Immadi
http://immadi.com
SEM BW Analyst

XML Publisher Report Issues

Hi,
We have customized a report (XML Publisher) in which our template is in XSL format.When using this stylesheet (.XSL) to print out PO's, there are some problems with the page layout, more specifically regarding the page breaks:
1) Extra empty page is printed - can this be avoided?
2) If the entire line block does not fit on the page, the line should be completely shifted to the next page (called "widow and orfan control" in MS Word) ?
How to avoid these issues? Replies will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Sumir

Hi,
We have customized a report (XML Publisher) in which our template is in XSL format.When using this stylesheet (.XSL) to print out PO's, there are some problems with the page layout, more specifically regarding the page breaks:
1) Extra empty page is printed - can this be avoided?
2) If the entire line block does not fit on the page, the line should be completely shifted to the next page (called "widow and orfan control" in MS Word) ?
How to avoid these issues? Replies will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Sumir

AP Trial Balance Report Issue

Hi gurus- I run the AP Trial Balance report and have an issue that I cannot reconcile with my raw data because when I export into excel, the invoice number is cut off after 20 characters. This client has long invoice numbers. Is there any way to get the SQL for this report and run it separately so I may see the invoice numbers and reconcile? Thanks a lot.

Hi,
Please check note:553484.1, there are some queries provided to check the TB data like queries to compare XLA and GL data.
Hope it helps

Custom Report issue

Hi Gurs,
I am in middle of a custom report developement which proivdes PO numbera and some of its relative dat, PR number and its relative data againust all the status of invoices(posted,parked,cancelled etc)
the issue i m facing is client wants Purchasing group in input screen, i took the purchasing group from EBAN, but when i run the report its taking lot of time to execute,
Could any one tell me how can i filtter the data so that i can get all the above mentioned data for a PG, or can i add any other field and make it mandatory to filter,
please suggest any other approches /idea/ how can i reduce the time interval
Thanks
Ravi

HI,
At present we are using logic based on input example PR number first program will extract data for PR and then It checks EKKO and EKPO for PO numbers and for filter PO number program will check RBKP for invoice numbers,
Its real Logic or you give example only?
But if i provice Purchasing group it checks the whole EBAN and next process the same steps,
its throwing run time errore,
As you said your company code and invoice document date are mandatory field
so your logic should flow from invoice table and end on PR number like below
RBKP and RSEG you will get invoice document date and Po number
Now pass Po number into table EKPO and get PR number ,if you want report for purchasing group wise then
add table EKKO and pass Po number there and ask ABAP consultant that when Purchasing group on selection screen ,output show only that Purchase group related
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Reporting Issue "Opening Balance values are going to Not Assigned Values"

Hi Friends,
Closing Balance values are perfectly showing but opening balance values are going to Not Assingned Values? I am not able to find it out.
our query is built on PCA Daily Multiprovider.
Pls Help.
Thanks
Asim

Hi Ravish,
Here are the details
Stock values and quantities in the PCA cube of BW never show correctly at an article level due to an opening balance issue. This reduces our ability to report on stocks at moving average price, i.e. anything that actually matches the financial values in the system. The issue arises because stock at the beginning of the year (quantity and value) for any site is only shown against an article of "Not assigned." Stock movements during the year are shown against the appropriate article.(If you have a new site, the will have stock assigned against an article up until 31 December and then the 31 December values are shown against "not assigned" for the next year).
Thanks
Asim

OIM 9.1.0.2 - Report issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for