OIM11g managed server startup takes too long

I am running a OIM11g managed server using weblogic on windows xp; in development mode
My managed server takes too long to startup; averaging atleast an hour at the minimum.
I am attaching the logs from the server between the time frame when it took the longest time.
Can someone please help me to improve the startup.
Edited by: 838243 on Feb 20, 2011 10:22 AM

<9:32:14 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: iam-ejb.jar>
<9:45:06 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '23' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<9:45:07 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:00:06 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:00:07 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:15:11 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:15:41 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:30:11 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '19' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:30:15 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:32:44 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module iam-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:32:44 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module dataobjects-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:33:08 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'dataobjects-ejb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:33:14 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: dataobjects-ejb.jar>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module dataobjects-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module iam-async-mdb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'iam-async-mdb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:38:11 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'iam-async-mdb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:38:11 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: iam-async-mdb.jar>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module iam-async-mdb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module xlWebApp of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'xlWebApp.war' with uri, 'WEB-INF/web.xml'. The plan was merged.>
Edited by: 838243 on Feb 20, 2011 10:22 AM

Similar Messages

Muse CC startup takes too long (up to 35 seconds)

For some reason, Muse CC takes too long to launch: up to 35 seconds. The splash screen stays up for that long until the program actually starts.
Photoshop CC, with several plug-ins and presets, takes only 3 seconds. My previous Muse versions launched a lot faster.
I'm on Windows 7, 64 bit. Any recommendations on this? Anybody else experiencing this issue?

Please try to clear Muse's preferences/cache as detailed in the following article and see if that helps.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5086018#5086018
Thanks,
Vinayak

Web application deployment takes too long?

Hi All,
We have a wls 10.3.5 clustering environment with one admin server and two managered servers separately. When we try to deploy a sizable web application, it takes about 1 hour to finish. It seems that it takes too long to finish the deployment. Here is the output from one of two managerd server system log. Could anyone tell me it is normal or not? If not, how can I improve this?
Thanks in advance,
John
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:03 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535463373> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:05 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <9baa7a67b5727417:26f76f6c:135ca05cff2:-8000-00000000000000b0> <1330535465664> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442300> <BEA-320143> <Scheduled 1 data retirement tasks as per configuration.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive HarvestedDataArchive>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive HarvestedDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive EventsDataArchive>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive EventsDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:23 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <weblogic.cluster.MessageReceiver> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539023098> <BEA-003107> <Lost 2 unicast message(s).>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:36 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539036105> <BEA-000111> <Adding Pinellas1tMS2 with ID -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 to cluster: Pinellas1tCluster1 view.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084375> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084507> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:36 AM
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:37 AM
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:38 AM

Hi John,
There may be some circumstances like when there are many files in the WEB-INF folder and JPS don't use TLD.
I don't think a 1hour deployment is normal, it should be much more faster.
Since you are using 10.3.5, I suggesto you to install the corresponding patch:
1. Download patch 10118941p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
2. Uncompress the file p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
3. Copy the required files (patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml, CIRF.jar ) to the Patch Download Directory (typically, this folder is <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/cache_dir).
4. Rename the file patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml into patch-catalog.xml .
5. Start Smart Update from <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/bsu.sh .
6. Select "Work Offline" mode.
7. Go to File->Preferences, and select "Patch Download Directory".
8. Click "Manage Patches" on the right panel.
9. You will see the patch in the panel below (Downloaded Patches)
10. Click "Apply button" of the downloaded patch to apply it to the target installation and follow the instructions on the screen.
11. Add "-Dweblogic.jsp.ignoreTLDsProcessingInWebApp=true" to the Java options to ignore additional findTLDs cost.
12. Restart servers.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Cris

Takes too long to hibernate when I close the lid - Also random device noise when it boots up

Hello guys.
Ever since i've wiped the machine, i've been having these two problems. When I close the lid, it used to go to sleep straight away, but now I can see the sleep light (and the power button) flash and flash, then it goes to sleep.
When waking up it goes through the lenovo startup screen and resuming windows, then it asks for a password, before I used to open the lid and it would ask me for the password straight away. I know it was going to sleep because I could hear the beep straight away when I closed and opened it, but now it just takes too long.
Also, everytime I boot up into windows or resume into windows from a sleep state, I can hear the device noise, like something is being plugged in/out. But there is nothing being plugged in or out at the time. I can't get to device manager quick enough to see what it is that is causing it.
But all drivers seem okay.
Thanks in advance.
Sam.
EDIT: Also noticed, when the lid is closed, randomly the laptop turns off (hear the beep) an then turns back off again.
Weird.
T420 model number: 4180-PR1 with OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit
T420 4180-PR1 - OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Sam,
is this to do with the T420 model number: 4180-PR1 with OS: Windows 7 64 bit installed on it as in another thread you posted in?
Maybe you could pop the information into your signature; members like to know which system and OS are involved. At the top next to Sign Out choose My Settings > Personal Profile > Personal Information - Signature
Andy ______________________________________
Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
PepperonI blog

Business Rules Project Takes Too Long to Open

Does anyone know why it takes too long (~3-5 minutes) to open/edit a security project definded for assigning business rules to planning application forms? We are using Hyperion v11.1.1.3.0. Essbase is on Windows server, Shared Services on Solaris 10 Unix. Even before we migrated Essbase to Windows to gain better performance running calcs, opening projects using EAS has always been very slow to open. Please advice if there is a way to improve performance on this.

Clear Cookies & Cache
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Template:clearCookiesCache
Clear the Network Cache
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/How%20to%20clear%20the%20cache#w_clear-the-cache
Firefox takes a long time to start up
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/firefox-takes-long-time-start-up
Check and tell if its working.

RPCPRRU0 takes too long

Dear Experts,
Report RPCPRRU0 takes too long to complete ? We have already tuned Memory , Oracle and other parameters only this job takes too long to complete.
Please suggest
Thanks,
Yoga

@Arjun - After running statistics on the table, it was much better. The Report was running for 15hrs and now its been reduced to 2.30hrs.
@Augusto - Thanks for the information. As you said, Yes, We are also running the payroll for every week . The Job actually runs dedicated BG job server and sometimes we tried running on CI and DB server, still same result.
Could you please share your experience on what are the optimization you done on the report ?
Thanks in Advance,
Yoga

MAcbook takes too long to boot

From one day to another our macbook takes too long to boot. The problem is since we push the power button until the first grey apple shows up, it can take up to 30 seconds. Since the apple shows up it boot in a few seconds. All the process up to 1.20 minutes.

Also... once you are in OS X, go to System Preferences and Startup Disk. Make sure your OS X volume is selected. Sometimes this can change causing your system to look for another startup disk... and it needs to "time out" before it moves on to the next. This is most common after removing a BootCamp installation of Windows... but can happen for any number of reasons.

Sometimes my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I am running a pretty powerful work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network, is it a hard drive issue? do I need to "clean out" the computer?

Many times my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I have wireless internet (time capsule) and I am running a pretty powerful real time financial work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network? is it a hard drive issue? do I only need to "clean out" the computer? Or all of the above...not to computer saavy. It is a Macbook Pro osx 10.6.8 (late 2010).

Almost certainly none of the above! Try each of the following in this order:
Select 'Reset Safari' from the Safari menu.
Close down Safari; move <home>/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Cache.db to the trash; restart Safari.
Change the DNS servers in your network settings to use the OpenDNS servers: 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220
Turn off DNS pre-fetching by entering the following command in Terminal and restarting Safari:
defaults write com.apple.safari WebKitDNSPrefetchingEnabled -boolean false

Accessing BKPF table takes too long

Hi,
Is there another way to have a faster and more optimized sql query that will access the table BKPF? Or other smaller tables that contain the same data?
I'm using this:
   select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart
   into corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
   from bkpf
   where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
   and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
   and blart in so_DocTypes
   and monat in so_monat.
The report is taking too long and is eating up a lot of resources.
Any helpful advice is highly appreciated. Thanks!

Hi max,
I also tried using BUDAT in the where clause of my sql statement, but even that takes too long.
    select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
     appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
     from bkpf
     where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
     and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
     and blart in so_DocTypes
     and budat in so_budat.
I also tried accessing the table per day, but it didn't worked too...
   while so_budat-low le so_budat-high.
     select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
     appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
     from bkpf
     where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
     and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
     and blart in so_DocTypes
     and budat eq so_budat-low.
     so_budat-low = so_budat-low + 1.
   endwhile.
I think our BKPF tables contains a very large set of data. Is there any other table besides BKPF where we could get all accounting document numbers in a given period?

Report Takes Too Long Time

Hi!
I am in troubble
following is the query
SELECT inv_no, inv_name, inv_desc, i.cat_id, cat_name, i.sub_cat_id,
sub_cat_name, asset_cost, del_date, i.bl_id, gen_desc bl_desc, p.prvcode, prvdesc, cur_loc,
pldesc, i.pmempno, pmname, i.empid, empname
FROM inv_reg i,
cat_reg c,
sub_cat_reg s,
gen_desc_reg g,
ploc p,
province r,
pmaster m,
iemp_reg e
WHERE i.sub_cat_id = s.sub_cat_id
AND i.cat_id = s.cat_id
AND s.cat_id = c.cat_id
AND i.bl_id = g.gen_id
AND i.cur_loc = p.plcode
AND p.prvcode = r.prvcode
AND i.pmempno = m.pmempno(+)
AND i.empid = e.empid(+)
&wc
order by prvdesc, pldesc, cat_name, sub_cat_name, inv_no
and this query returns 32000 records
when i run this query on reports 10g
then it takes 10 to 20 minuts to generate report
how can i optimize it...?

Hi Waqas Attari
Pls study & try this ....
When your query takes too long ...
hope it helps....
Regards,
Abdetu...

OPM process execution process parameters takes too long time to complete

PROCESS_PARAMETERS are inserted every 15 min. using gme_api_pub packages. some times it takes too long time to complete the batch ,ie completion of request. it takes about 5-6 hrs long time ,in other time s it takes only 15-20 mins.This happens at regular interval...if anybody can guide me I will be thankful to him/her..
thanks in advance.
regds,
Shailesh

Generally the slowest part of the process is in the extraction itself...
Check in your source system and see how long the processes are taking, if there are delays, locks or dumps in the database... If your source is R/3 or ECC transactions like SM37, SM21, ST22 can help monitor this activity...
Consider running less processes in parallel if you have too many and see some delays in jobs... Also indexing some of the tables in the source system to expedite the extraction, make sure there are no heavy processes or interfaces running in the source system at the same time you're trying to load... Check with your Basis guys for activity peaks and plan accordingly...
In BW also check in your SM21 for database errors or delays...
Just some ideas...

RPURMP00 program takes too long

Hi Guys,
Need some help on this one guys. Not getting any where with this issue.
I am running RPURMP00 ( Program to Create Third-Party Remittance Posting Run ) and while running it in test mode for 1 employee it takes too long .
I ran this in background during off hours , but it takes 19,000 + sec to run and then cancels .
The long text message is No entry in table T51R6_FUNDINFO (Remittance detail table for all entities) for key 0002485844    and     Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE
I check the program and I found a nested loop within the program (include RPURMP02 ) and decided to debug it with a break point.
It short dumped and here is the st22 message and source code extract.
      ----Message -
" Time limit exceeded ".
"The program "RPURMP00" has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime without
Interruption and has therefore been terminated."
      ----Source code extract -
Include RPURMP02
172 &----
173 *&      Form get_advice_info
174 &----
175 *       text
176 ----
177 * --> p1        text
178 * <-- p2        text
179 ----
180 FORM get_advice_info .
181
182 * get information for advice form only if vendor sub-group and
183 * employee detail is maintained
184   IF ( NOT t51rh-lifsg IS INITIAL ) AND
185      ( NOT t51rh-hrper IS INITIAL ).
186
187 *   get remittance items employee number
188     SELECT * FROM t51r4 WHERE remky = t51r5-remky. "#EC CI_GENBUFF "SAM0632658
189 *     get payroll seqno determined by PERNR and RDATN
>>>>>       SELECT * FROM t51r8 WHERE pernr = t51r4-pernr
191                             AND rdatn = t51r5-rdatn
192                             ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY. "#EC CI_GENBUFF
193         EXIT.
194       ENDSELECT.
Has anyone ever come across this situation? Any input from anyone on this?
Regards.
CJ

Hi,
What is your SAP version?
Have you checked if some OSS notes is there on performance.
Regards,
Atish

AME CS6 rendering with AE and Pr takes too long

Hi Guys,
Need some help here. i have rendered a 30 secs mp4 video with 1920 x 1080 HD format 25 frames w/o scripting in AME for 4 hours!
Why does it take too long? I have rendered a 2 minute video with same format w/ scripting but only spare less than 30 minutes for rendering.
Im using After Effects and Premium Pro both CS6 and using Dynamic Link in AME.
What seems to be wrong in my current settings?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!

This may be a waste of time, but it won't take a minute and is something you should always do whenever things go strangely wrong ............ trash the preferences, assuming you haven't done it already.
Many weird things happen as a result of corrupt preferences which can create a vast range of different symptoms, so whenever FCP X stops working properly in any way, trashing the preferences should be the first thing you do using this free app.
http://www.digitalrebellion.com/prefman/
Shut down FCP X, open PreferenceManager and in the window that appears:-
1. Ensure that only FCP X is selected.
2. Click Trash
The job is done instantly and you can re-open FCP X.
There is absolutely no danger in trashing preferences and you can do it as often as you like.
The preferences are kept separately from FCP X and if there aren't any when FCP X opens it automatically creates new ones . . . instantly.

My Query takes too long ...

Hi ,
Env   , DB 10G , O/S Linux Redhat , My DB size is about 80G
My query takes too long , about 5 days to get results , can you please help to rewrite this query in a better way ,
declare
x number;
y date;
START_DATE DATE;
MDN VARCHAR2(12);
TOPUP VARCHAR2(50);
begin
for first_bundle in
select min(date_time_of_event) date_time_of_event ,account_identifier ,top_up_profile_name
from bundlepur
where account_profile='Basic'
AND account_identifier='665004664'
and in_service_result_indicator=0
and network_cause_result_indicator=0
and   DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT >= to_date('16/07/2013','dd/mm/yyyy')
group by account_identifier,top_up_profile_name
order by date_time_of_event
loop
select sum(units_per_tariff_rum2) ,max(date_time_of_event)
into x,y
from OLD_LTE_CDR
where account_identifier=(select first_bundle.account_identifier from dual)
and date_time_of_event >= (select first_bundle.date_time_of_event from dual)
and -- no more than a month
date_time_of_event < ( select add_months(first_bundle.date_time_of_event,1) from dual)
and -- finished his bundle then buy a new one
date_time_of_event < ( SELECT MIN(DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT)
                         FROM OLD_LTE_CDR
                         WHERE DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT > (select (first_bundle.date_time_of_event)+1/24 from dual)
                         AND IN_SERVICE_RESULT_INDICATOR=26);
select first_bundle.account_identifier ,first_bundle.top_up_profile_name
,FIRST_BUNDLE.date_time_of_event
INTO MDN,TOPUP,START_DATE
from dual;
insert into consumed1 VALUES(X,topup,MDN,START_DATE,Y);
end loop;
COMMIT;
end;

> where account_identifier=(select first_bundle.account_identifier from dual)
Why are you doing this? It's a completely unnecessary subquery.
Just do this:
where account_identifier = first_bundle.account_identifier
Same for all your other FROM DUAL subqueries. Get rid of them.
More importantly, don't use a cursor for loop. Just write one big INSERT statement that does what you want.

Sql Query takes too long to enter into the first line

Hi Friends,
I am using SQLServer 2008. I am running the query for fetching the data from database. when i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second) to enter into first
line of the stored procedure. After its enter into the first statement of the SP, its fetching the data within a second. I think there is no problem with Sqlquery. Kindly let me know if you know the reason behind this.
Sample Example:
Create Sp Sp_Name
as
Begin
print Getdate()
Sql statements for fetching datas
Print Getdate()
End
In the above example, there is no difference between first date and second date.
Please help me to trouble shooting this problem.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar.R

i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second)
Additional to Manoj: A
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE clears the procedure cache, so all store procedure must be newly compilied on the first call.
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

OIM11g managed server startup takes too long

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for