OKBA not posting values

Dear all,
Any one please give some input on the following points,
I am doing transfer of FI documents from FI to CO by using OKBA it is not giving error messages but in reports value is not coming.
After creating cost element and posting by OKBA system is asking about CO assignment (cost center)
Thanks,
Sekhar.

Hi Sekhar
Normally if a cost element is not created for a GL Account, you are not passing entries to Controlling or Management Accounting.You posted some entries with those GL Accounts, since there was no cost element, it would not have asked for CO assignment.
Now you have created a cost element for those GL Accounts, and you want to transfer those entries to Controlling.
You need to assign a cost object like Cost center, Internal Order etc...otherwise you would get that error.
Regards,
Suraj

Similar Messages

Hierarchies - Showing not posted values.

Hi,
I've a query, I'm using InfoObject 0GL_ACCOUNT and a hierarchy for displaying it.
For some accounts, no values have been ever posted, but I wan't this accounts tho show when you expand the hierarchy.
Now when you expand the hierarchy only the accounts that have posted values are showing.
Is this possible ?
I'm using BW 3.5 SP15
Thanks in Advance,
Miguel P.

Hi,
As Jaya mentioned you need a Multiprovider on 0GL_ACCOUNT characterstic and Base Cube.
Take a look on the standard query 0IC_MC01_Q0001 which is bulit on Multi provider 0IC_MC01 in the query designer .Here the important Thing is The column caleed "All Mterias" ,which makes all the materials to be displayed in the report.
Similarly you need to take a KF which is only available in 0GL_ACCOUNT as an attribute. And restrct it with Info provider = 0GL_ACCOUNT. And take Tick mark(by right click on this column) for Constant selection and tick mark for "Display values not posted".
Foe more general info:
Re: "Dead stock" report
Re: Multiprovider(infocube + info object)
Re: How to display Fat/Medium/Slow moving materials in Query
Re: Inventory
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P
Message was edited by:
Anil Kumar Sharma

Altering the net value and not posting to Accounting

Dears SD pricing experts.
how can I make a condition type alters the net value of a sales order and not posting it to Pricing procedure (Without ticking the statistical tick mark in Pricing procedure since it is not updating the net value for the sales order).
best regards
Moahmmed

Dear Mohammed
I am unable to understand your comment "not posting it to Pricing procedure". Probably, it should have been "not posting it to Accounting".
If this is what your requirement is, either you can select "Statistical" as you yourself had indicated, or don't assign any account key in pricing procedure, so that the said condition wont hit any G/L account.
Last but not least, it would have been more appropriate had you briefed your requirement / process clearly instead of posting such a question.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Error in CJ88 Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)

When i try CJ88 with a wbs element, it shows the following error :
Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)
Message no. AA 478
Diagnosis
A retirement was already posted on the asset 000022400733 0041 on 20091231. Based on the value date 20091231 of the transaction, this transaction should have been included in the calculation of values for the retirement.
System Response
The transaction is rejected.
Procedure
Check the value date of the transaction.
In need to put year 2009 in date of the transaction, but it isnt posible. ¿Why? I dont know very much about asset accounting...

Hi
It is not allowing for WBS element final settlement, because of your asset already retairement was done.
By best suggetion is, You will create the new WBS element and transfer the all cost line items from old WBS element to new WBS element, then you will try to settlement for another asset in CJ88.
I hope it will use for you.
Regards
PVCPVC

Depreciation value not shown under the tab 'posted value' in AW01N

Dear experts
I have in chart of depreciation US GAAP book(posted to G/L), local GAAP book(not posted), book to post difference of two GAAP(posted to G/L), and local tax book.
In AW01N, the ordinary depreciation value is shown correctly for all books in the first tab 'planned values',
But on the second tab 'posted values', depreciation value only shown for the US GAAP book.
I'm thinking it maybe relavant with posting to G/L or not, that means only book with posting to G/L is shown with deprecation value on the second tab.
But something strange is in another chart of deprecation, deprecation value is shown for US book, local book.
Could someone comment how to control deprecation value shown or not on the second tab by local book?
Best Regards,
Nicole

Hi,
If you would have mentioned it as a "area post in real time" it will show you in the aw01n. If not, it will not show. Because, the tab specifies the posted values which means how much depreciation posted to GL.
As you have put "area doesnot post" for the local book, it will not show the balance.
Thanks,
sravankumar

AFAR test run showing the values but not posting in Real run.

Hi Friends,
i have an issue with AFAR recalculating the depreclation. The details are as below;
1. Asset value date is 15.07.2010. but ordinary dep. start date was set as 01.01.2010 manually by the user.
2. The Period control method 11, the dep. is calculated for entire year for acquisition.
3. we have already calculated depreciation from period 12 2010 to period 04, 2011.
4. Now, we have changed ordinary depreciation start date for 5 asset records from 01.01.2010 to 15.07.2010.
5. Therefore, we recalculated AFAR for these assets for 2010 and test run is showing the values for these 5 asset. The same was expected by the business.
6. When we execute the real run, it is not posting and no change in asset explorer for period 12, 2010 or in current period. No error message is available in spool / job log.
We have opened FI periods as well.
My question is that why the system calculating the values in test run and if it is calculated in test run, why it is not posting in update run?
As per the period control method, the depreciation should not recalculated for half year even we change the ordinary dep,start date from 1st Jan to 15th July.
I request you to clarify my doubt and help me to understand the error which is stoping the values in update run of AFAR.
Best Regards,
Padmaja

Hi,
Sorry...it is not worked out. Alternatively, i tried the shift factor with variable depreciation and i achieved the values which appeared in AFAR test run.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Padmaja
Edited by: PadmajaCH on May 19, 2011 3:26 PM

Posting not possible (Value date earlier than capitalization date)

Hello , we are getting the error shown below. I'am not sure where to go to fix this can any offer any advice.
Thank you
Posting not possible (Value date earlier than capitalization date)
Message no. AA 322
Diagnosis
Asset 000000040048 0000 was first capitalized on 20080831.
You cannot post to an asset that was not yet capitalized.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Change the asset value date of your posting.
Capitalize the asset by posting an acquisition.

Generally this message will come , if you have created a asset with a capitalization date say 31/08/2008 and you are settling a Internal order for last period say 07 on with a posting date earlier than capitalization date , say 15/08/2008.
The System will not allow you to post because the value date cannot be earlier than capitalization date.
Change the value date to later than capitalization date and post.

ABUMN-error "Posting transaction is not possible (Value date not allowed)"

Hi,
When we are trying to transfer asset within company code thru Tcode ABUMN, we are getting a error as
"Posting transaction is not possible (Value date not allowed)"
What actually we are doing is we are trying to transfer the previous year asset for example say 01.04.2007 assets on today.
the Parameters are as below
Document date :26.03.2008
Posting Date :26.03.2008
Asset value date is 01.04.2007.
Then the system is throwing an error and not alloing to post the previous year transfers.
Can any one help me out.
Cheers
Sri

Hi,
I think, if you give old asset value date, system will give you the error. This may be because, you are trying to transfer the assets with old values, means in your examble the dep. from the 01.04.2007 to 29.02.2008 whould have been charged.
So, give the current year date means any date from 01.01.2008 to till date.
If you read F1 help for the value date column, it states,
Asset value date
The asset value date is the value date for Asset Accounting. It can deviate from the posting and document date and be in posting periods already closed for Financial Accounting. However, the posting year and asset value date year must be the same.
Since the asset value date can have a direct influence on the amount of depreciation, the system creates a default value when it can. You can specify in Customizing how the the default asset value date is determined by the system.
Hope it helps
Saravanan.A

Only posted values for Navigation does not work

Hi,
I have a problem where all master data is shown in the input help for a variable, even when the setting for the info object is to show only posted values.
In a WEB template I have tree reports using tree different data providers. The setting in the web template is to show the same variable only once and that works. The setting of the info objects is to show only posted values. That does not work!
When using the input help for a variable, all master data shows, not only the poster values in the data providers.
When unchecking the setting Display Same Variable Only Once (MELT_VARBLES) the variables appears tree times each and the input help works as expected. It shows only posted values.
Any experience of this?
Best Regards
Kent

Hi Kent,
If you build several queries on different infoproviders, then put them into one web template or workbook. Variables from different queries with the same technical name will get merged in variable screen (Set parameter MERGE_VARIABLES=True in web template property. Set "Display Duplicated Variables Only Once" in workbook settings for variables).
This means, that it is not possible to decide which infoprovider the variable is based on. The provider is unknown to the system when doing F4 help so that D mode is not possible since D mode [Only Values in InfoProvider] is also infoprovider dependent. So only M mode ['Values in Master Data Table'] is possible.
In such merge variable situation, the authorizated values in F4 help is also retrieved without specific infoprovider.
Regards,
Nishant

BEX F4 help values from posted values in Info Provider not from Master data

We have an info object called Archival purpose and it is display attribute of Master data info object Archive Number. Both Info objects are used in a cube. Posted values in cube have only two value for info object Archival purose which is "EXCOM" and "EA".
But when we do the F4 in the bex query, we see some other F4 values. Although Master data is having other entries but we have defined in the bex property of both the info object to read the f4 value from the posted values in the info provioder.
Please suggest how to get values in bex F4 help only from posted values in info provider and not from the master data.
Thanks

Hi,
You don't need to change the Infoobject definition as it will become global and it will be applicable for whereever this infoobject is used. Instead you can manage this setting for this particular Infoprovider.
Go to RSA1 and double click on your infoprovider used for this query, go to change mode. From the right hand side dimension tree search for the Infoobject for which you want to maintain this property. If it is navigation attribute then you can search it in navigation attribute tree.
Once you find the infoobject right click and from context menu choose the first option "InfoObject specific properties". In the next popup in the last option about F4 values for filter you can select the option, "Only values from Infoprovider".
Regards,
Durgesh.

Publish values not posted

Hi
Can anyone tell me, what is the usage of "publish values not posted" tick?
regards
SP

closing the thread

Is it possible to easily view the actual (not displayed) value of a cell?

Is it possible to easily view the actual value of a cell calculated by a formula, not the displayed value after it has been rounded off?
For instance, if you enter the number 1.23456789 and display it rounded to 3 decimal places, you can still see the full, actual value in the formula bar:
The problem arises when you reference that number in a formula: you can't see the underlying value (even though it's obviously known to Numbers):
Is there a way to get the formula bar (or a tooltip) to show the full, unrounded value? Changing the display to more decimal places is not very convenient, especially on big spreadsheets. Maybe it could be done via AppleScript?
A related issue arises when you try to look at the sum or average of a number: if the numbers being summed have the same number of rounded decimals, the sum displayed is rounded too. I find this very annoying: I want to see the actual value, not how my spreadsheet may be displaying it in that cell.
Although, curiously, rounding to any number of decimals as long as they are not all the same displays the full, correct underlying values:
Has anyone come up with workarounds for these issues?

I did it with an AppleScript.
Now any time I have a cell or cell range selected, I do one click (AppleScript menu > Display Value at Full Precision), and it shows me a popup alert that simply reads:
     rowname : columnname
     value
Here's the script:
tell application "Numbers"
          try
                    set selectedTables to (tables of sheets of front document whose selection range is not missing value)
                    repeat with selectedTable in selectedTables -- tables of each sheet
                              if contents of selectedTable is not {} then -- the list is not empty, it's the selected sheet
                                        set selectedCells to cells of selection range of (get item 1 of selectedTable)
                                        repeat with i in selectedCells -- each selected cell
                                                  set {selectedRow, selectedColumn, selectedVal} to {row, column, value} of i
--                                                  display alert "value of " & name of selectedRow & " : " & name of selectedColumn & " (" & address of selectedRow & ":" & address of selectedColumn & ")" message selectedVal
display alert name of selectedRow & " : " & name of selectedColumn message selectedVal
                                        end repeat
                                        return
                              end if
                    end repeat
          on error eMsg number eNum
display alert eMsg
          end try
end tell
( Props to Jacques Rioux who posted code to get me started at https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3964938 )

Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

Dear Expert,
I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
Please advice.
Thank you.
KH

Hi Kiran,
The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
BR, Srinivas Salpala

MIRO gets posted and Part II is not posted

Dear Friends,
MIRO gets posted even if PART is not posted for excise material which create problem.
How to stop this.
Regards,
Pravin Joshi

hai,
Std SAP will copy values from PO history to MIRO screen.if you want change you can change as per your GR value.otherwise post it and do subsquent debit /credit .

Excise duty for some line item of material document is not posted

Dear CIN Exerts,
In my Scenario user is Posting Excise invoice for every GR (105) by J1IEX to generate Excise invoice.
In some Past cases, if there are more then one line item in a GR then Excise value for some material is not showing (May be that time user not Did J1ID (Excise rate maintenance ).
Now the problem is that we wants to post excise Duty for those material WRT material document for whom it was not posted.
Please let me know that how can we do so (excise posting against Material document) so that it get reflected (for those line items for which Excise deuty is not posted) in MIGO > Document Display> Excise items tab .
Regards,
Ashutosh

Excise posting is not recommended by sap for movements 103 or 105.
Refer or search for SAP notes with subject CIN Limited functionalities.

OKBA not posting values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for