Old PhotoDeluxe won't run on XP machine

I have a version of PhotoDeluxe (2.0) that I have been using since I had Windows98. I have many images saved in it's format, I liked using it. I am now running Windows XP, I have run it on other XP machines. When I try to run it on my current machine I get an error "There is not enough memory (RAM) to launch PhotoDeluxe."
I have tried, unsuccessfully to install updates (both 4.0 and 3.0) to no avail. What must I do to get a version of PhotoDeluxe running on my computer?

MichaelKazlow,
My machine has 990 MB of RAM.
In fact the system is : Pentium Dual CPU T2310 @ 1.46GHz, 0.99GB of RAM, Physical Address Extension.
I have been using PhotoDeluxe since the '90s when it ran on a a machine with 96 MB of RAM running at a few hundred MHz.
What would prevent the program from reconizing the memory when I try to open it?

Similar Messages

All video file formats won't run on my machine.

This includes mov, avi, mp3, mp4 file formats. I tested using the following software: Quicktime 7 Pro, x, all browsers, iTunes, and mpeg streamclip. Quicktime gives me the following error, "The movie could not be opened. The operation couldn’t be completed. (OSStatus error -50.)". I can't locate the associated error listing to suggest where to look next.
I can only get wmv files to run in windows media player. I deleted quicktime preferences from my library, and rebooted my system, to no avail. Any other suggestions?

Cmasillon:
Thank you for the good advice on the Update Combo. I've been running Snow Leopard since it was relatively new. As of recently, I had been unable to open any .mov files with my Quicktime 7 Pro and was getting the "OSStatus error -50" error message whenever I tried to do so. I don't know when and why that problem/conflict arose, but I had downloaded and installed Microsoft Office 2011 for mac about a month ago and this was the first time that I'd seen that error message. Can't really blame it on MS, but if it walks like a duck...
Given that fact, I tried to use my Quicktime 10 to trim those videos. They opened and played in QT 10, but after I'd trimmed them and tried to Save them - whoops, the "OSStatus error -50" message again. It wouldn't let me save my chages. (QT 10 would first tell me that I couldn't save under that filename, prompting me to try to change the name, to no avail.
Previously, the only problem I'd experienced was that my Quicktime 7 Pro would crash if I clicked to open a media file in the Finder without first having opened QT 7 Pro. My make-do solution for that was simply to keep in mind that I needed to open the ap first. When I had previously tried to download and re-install QT 7, the machine wouldn't let me do it, saying that QT 7 was already installed. - Frustration galore -
Anyway, I was recently able to download and install Quicktime 7 version 7.6.6, which is acceptable to Snow Leopard. I also saw your post about having resolved your problem by downloading Combo Update 10.6.7 for OSX Snow Leopard and immediately clicked on "Software Update" the combo update included 10.6.8 update for Snow Leopard, so I downloaded and installed. Boom! my problems are all gone. Quicktime 7 Pro and Quicktime 10 both work as they should, and I don't even have to pre-open 7 anymore, so I can simply double click on QT 7 files in the finder.
Thanks again for pointing me in the right direction.

Labview 8.5 executable won't run on Runtime Machines

Created an .exe from my Labview Project TS_playback.lvproj. I am running Labview 8.5. Target computers have Runtime Engine 8.5. Windows XP mostly (and 2000). When I run the .exe I either get a quick flash of the loading vi box , or nothing at all. If I have task manager open, I do see the exe open briefly before disappearing.
When creating the exe, I use my main vi as the startup vi.
I don't use any other files in 'Always included'
All subvi's and dependencies are 'Included if referenced'
Custom vi properties of startup vi are basically default, except - turn off run when open, turn off allow debugging.
Note - the vi has locked subvi's associated with LockinPLL and LockinDemodulator.
The code itself is a torn down version of a much more complicated real-time version. This version is simply to post-process data, mainly for a client to fiddle with, so it is meant to function and not be pretty. Sadly, now it only functions on our office machine.
Any help would be great.
Thanks
Attachments:
TS_Playback.zip ‏3064 KB

Lokis wrote:
Target computers have Runtime Engine 8.5.
There are two flavors of the runtime engine and you need the 97MB one. Could it be that you installed only the 24MB web browser version
See this page for details.
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

JRE 6.3 won't run on Solaris machine

Hi all
I've just tried to install the latest JRE on a Solaris 5.8 SPARC box. Downloaded, untarred and setup the path fine. However, whenever I call java, I get:
Error occurred during initialization of VM
dlinfo SERINFOSIZE request: ld.so.1: java: fatal: __vsnprintf: can't find symbolThis also happens if I try java -version, making me think it's a pretty basic error occurring early on. ld.so.1 seems related in some way to linking and, although I'm not doing in dev/compiling here, I did have set up a fair few symbolic links across my system that all point at bin/java.
I'm completely stuck. Thinking it's a missing library, I reuntarred (what a word..) - same problem. The soft links and paths all look good. Any idea what I should look at next?
Thanks!

uninstall the JRE 6u3 then re-install it:
- 32 bit OS: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/jre/install-solaris.html
- 64 bit OS: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/jre/install-solaris-64.html
(http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/index.html)

My processer won't run the new update ?

I have an iBook G4. After downloading the new version of Firefox it will not run so I have to continue with the older version. I continuously get messages telling me my version is out of date which is getting annoying.
Apple want me to buy a new computer at about £1000 which I can't afford.even if I could, the old programmes won't run on new processors so I would the have to buy them all again. not a good AD for apple? Greed rears it's ugly head!!!.
Thanks in anticipation. Regards Geoff Downend.

hello GeoffDd, the tenfourfox project develops a browser that is based on the current firefox for your hardware plattform: http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/

What won't run in Rosetta?

Hi,
What type of Apps will not run in Rosetta?
Michael

For one, Apple's own Pro software will not run on these computers, despite the fact that they are using Final Cut Pro as a benchmark on the iMac/MacBook product pages. Final Cut Pro or Express, DVD Studio Pro, Logic, Logic Express, Aperture... you'll have to wait until the Universal Binaries come out (supposedly in March), and then you'll have to pay to "upgrade."
I can't believe they are using benchmarks from pieces of software that won't run on these machines (yet) to sell them. Someone who didn't do his research would think these machines would be great for Final Cut, only to find out they don't run them, period.

I am running an older machine OS 10.6.8. I can no longer snyc my iphone. It tells me to download the latest itune which I don't seem to be able to do. Someone told me that my OS is too old. True?

I am running an older machine OS 10.6.8. I can no longer snyc my iphone. It tells me to download the latest itune which I don't seem to be able to do. Someone told me that my OS is too old. True?

You can use the latest iTunes (11.1.3) on 10.6.8 - if Software Update doesn't provide it (which it should) then you can download it from http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/

How do I retrieve data from time machine from an old mac (which was running 10.5) on my new iMac running mavericks?

How do I retrieve data from time machine from an old mac (which was running 10.5) on my new iMac running mavericks?

See B 5/6.
Time Machine Troubleshooting

Hi. My iMac hard drive is running Mavericks. I have an old version of Quark Xpress (3.32) which won't run in Mavericks. Can I partition my hard drive and run an older system on one partition, so I can access my Quark? Is that possible?

Hi. My iMac hard drive is running Mavericks. I have an old version of Quark Xpress (3.32) which won't run in Mavericks. Can I partition my hard drive and run an older system on one partition, so I can access my Quark? Is that possible?

Hi ancelau,
QuarkXPress 3 is a Classic Mac OS application, so you need a version of OS X that still supports Classic. I believe 10.4 was the last one.
So if you have an iMac that boots with 10.4, then yes that is possible. I doubt though that newer Macs boot with OS X 10.4.
So why don't you upgrade QuarkXPress 3 to a newer version? I am not just asking that because I want you to spend money with us.
Typically using software that was released almost 20 years ago is just feasible when you keep an environment that was current at the time of release or a few years after, so an older Mac with a operating system present at that time. 20 years in IT is a lot.
So my opinion is that on a new Mac with a brand new operating system you need to use something a bit more current.
How about QuarkXPress 9 (released 3 years ago) or QuarkXPress 10? You are better off with v9, as QuarkXPress 10 only opens v7 and higher (whereas QuarkXPress 9 opens v3.1 and higher).
Or - I am even happy to make an exception - upgrade to 9 and we give you 10 for free? Let me know please.
Thanks
Matthias

Have Photoshop Elements from 2001. Got new computer with Windows 7 Professional 64 bit. It won't run on my new computer. What version is MOST SIMILAR to the old version I have, that will run on W7P-64? Thanks for any help. Popjer

Have Photoshop Elements from 2001. Got new computer with Windows 7 Professional 64 bit. It won't run on my new computer. What version is MOST SIMILAR to the old version I have, that will run on W7P-64? Thanks for any help. Popjer

You should probably just download the trial version of pse 12 and see if you can live with it.
Download a free trial or buy Adobe products | Adobe downloads
That being said, have you tried to install pse 1 on your computer?
How much free space is on your hard drive?
Do you have Internet Explorer 10 or 11?
Pse 1 can run on windows 7 x64, provided certain conditions are met.

I recently bought a WD My Book Live to backup using Time Machine, now that I've upgraded to and my old NAS won't support Mountain Lion. The WD drive appears in the Finder, it doesn't appear as an option when setting up the backup disc in Time Machine.

I recently bought a WD My Book Live to backup using Time Machine, now that I've upgraded to and my old NAS won't support Mountain Lion. The WD drive appears in the Finder, but it doesn't appear as an option when setting up the backup disc in Time Machine. Any ideas please?

" now that I've upgraded to and my old NAS won't support Mountain Lion. "
Do you have a few words missing in the original question ?.
When i upgraded from LION to MOUNTAIN LION it made NO difference at all to my MyBook Live !!!
reading the original post again and again, do you in fact have two My Book Live units, an old one and a new one ?
tim

Old Flash in new Firefox won't run, no warnings.

Opened my laptop using a current version of FF but with Flash 11.9. Viewed one of my pages with Flash content and.... nothing, just an empty div. No warnings that Flash was out of date, etc. So if I have this right FF won't run out of date Flash for security reasons. Fine. I've always seen warnings in these cases. But apparently if Flash is old enough FF just doesn't bother. Visitors have no idea what is happening. It just looks bad.
Is this correct? What is the recommended way of dealing with this from a developer's viewpoint?

We strongly recommend that users always run the latest version of Flash Player. Running an old version puts users at risk for malware infection. The vast majority of users are opted in to background update and are kept updated automatically, but there are users that for whatever reason have chosen to stick with an old, vulnerable version of Flash Player. While this is a bad idea, people are certainly free to do it. The upside is that the affected population that you're describing is pretty small.
The upgrade story will actually get better over time. The latest versions of both Google Chrome and Internet Explorer include Flash Player as a built-in component, distributed with the browser. Users are always updated with the latest version of Flash, and new updates are delivered inline via the Chrome updater or Windows Update respectively. Mozilla has spent a few years talking about how Flash needs to go away, while the other browser vendors have been investing in modernized plug-in interfaces and improvements in plug-in security, and unfortunately the prioritization is showing in the user experience. We're hopeful that Windows 10 will pick up the majority of the WinXP and Vista stragglers as well as many of the Win7 - Win8.1 users, which means that the whole Flash update problem for a very large population of people will be solved in IE once people upgrade.
It's hard to say what's at the root of the specific issue you're describing. With the major browsers on 4 or 6 week major update cycles (we publish monthly to ensure we can catch and address any new injections in the browsers that might come up in nightly/beta versions before they hit the general population, and to align with Microsoft patch tuesday), so you're talking something like 18 months worth of changes between the Firefox version you're running and the version of Flash that you're running. Everything at Mozilla gets done with bugs, and we'd definitely encourage you to file a bug on the user experience that you're seeing. They've been operating from a reactive place lately, and some of the changes that impact Flash definitely appear to be a little slapdash. It's ultimately good for them to hear from the developer community and not just me all the time, but feel free to add me to the CC: list in the bug.
We ultimately have no control over the longevity of a particular build of Flash -- there are way too many external variables -- and we're also investing a huge amount of effort in proactive security work (and it's been our top engineering priority for years). So each build usually includes large numbers of changes designed to either harden the player or address responsibly disclosed issues from researchers, the larger security and computer science communities and whatever the latest auditing and testing tools we can get our hands on are. The continuous stream of innovation and ingenuity in the offense space is impressive, but keeps us pretty busy. Browser-side changes can easily break older versions of the plug-in, and running an old version is just a bad idea.
So we've really streamlined the installation process to keep people on current versions, and Windows 10 will hopefully be a massive shift away from older, more vulnerable versions of Windows. The landscape is so different than it was even 4-5 years ago.. the days of running anything for years (or months) in your browser are long gone. The pace isn't going to slow down anytime soon, either.

Recently updated my iphone 4s software. now it won't sync w/ itunes, says i need updated itunes. i updated itunes... now it says that my desktop software is old and can't run new itunes. Yet, i cant update my computer either. PLEASE HELP!!!! UGHH

recently updated my iphone 4s software. now it won't sync w/ itunes, says i need updated itunes. i updated itunes... now it says that my desktop software is old and can't run new itunes. Yet, i cant update my computer either. PLEASE HELP!!!! UGHH

Why can't you update your computer operating system ("desktop software")? What software would that be?

Just bought a Macbook Pro. I want a clean install so won't use a Time Machine backup but how can I install the software I bought from Apple Store? can I just delete it from the old machine that is going to someone else?

Just bought a Macbook Pro. I want a clean install so won't use a Time Machine backup but how can I install the software I bought from Apple Store? can I just delete it from the old machine that is going to someone else?

The ne
The new machine has Mavericks which is fine. And I will leave it as is. I don’t want anything from my old machine other than 2 apps that I will need on the new one. I want to be able to install those apps that I bought from the App Store onto my new computer. I assume Apple doesn’t want me to have the apps installed on 2 machines at the same time so I wonder if just uninstalling them from my old machine will release them for re-install on the new one.

HT3231 I use Migration Assistant to transfer data from my old MacBook to a new MacBook Pro. Both run OSX 10.7.4 This was done wirelessly. Now Safari won't run on my Pro. It was Safari 6 on the MacBook, but is now Safari 5.1.6 on the Pro. Could this be th

Safari 5.1.6 won't run on my Pro. It was Safari 6 on the MacBook I transfered the data from. Could this be the problem, and if so, how do I up grade to Safari 6? I can't seem to find any help.

Lion should be running Safari 6. Try Software update. Or apply the Lion 10.7.4 Combo installer:
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1524

Old PhotoDeluxe won't run on XP machine

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for