OME4 Transport reqeust issues in 4.6

Hi Folks,
I have to apply SPRO->OME4 customization changes into production system. In 4.6, system doesn't ask to create a transport request when a customization change is made using tcode OME4. I created a transport request using
"Table View ->Transport" option, but the problem is i don't see any objects in the transport request.
When i see an old transport request created by a different user, i see "V_024" object name. I am not sure what i doing different, which is causing not to include objects in the transport.  I also created a transport request by selection all entries and  pressing "Include in request". I noticed a messenge some thing like  "50 entries selected to included in the request" but no object is request. I am not sure, if this is normal or i am doing something wrong. Could you please, help us on how to create a correct transport request in this scenario. Thanks a lot for your help.

Hello rk_007,
when you perform any change in the view V_024 in transaction OME4, it a customizing change in that particular client in the system.
Recording of customizng changes in a client in a system depends on some of the following settings. They are:
1. Transaction SCC4:
Change and transport for Client specific customizing objects - when Automatic recording is chosen, any customizing changes is forced to record into a transport request.
2. In SE54, generated object, Recording routine setting - Standard recording routine -  this is the connection with the
transport tool. When this is chosen, changes in that object will be recorded into transport request.
  No, or user recording routine -  connection to transport tool is removed. So its not mandatory to record the changes into transport request.
In this case, please check what is the settings maintained in the SCC4 transaction. You can set the setting accordingly.
Then please check the setting maintained in SE54.
1) Goto Se54, choose generated objects radio button.
Display the setting
Choose the value no,or user recording routine.
Save the changes made.
You might be asked for a developer key to make this change. Please generate a developer key and make this change.
With this change, when a customizng change in this view is performed, user is not forced to record into a transport request ie. no pop for transport request is shown. Still it can be manually transported if required.
Also, as an additional information, there's the 'current setting flag' parameter. Current setting flag is used only to make the customizng object editable in a productions system (client role = Production). This does not play any role in a non productive system. For details on current setting flag refer to the note 77430.
I hope this helps
Best regards,
Tomas Black

Similar Messages

  • Stock Transport order issueing storage location determination

    Folks,
    In case of a Stock transport order scenario in which plant A with SLOC1 delivery to plant B with SLOC 2. Is there any option how the issueing storage location can be determined? The delivering plant can be determined through the special procurement key but there is no option for the issueing SLOC.
    Regards,
    MdZ

    Hey Karen!
    I am not sure if I understand your problem correctly.
    You do not want the system to create a new MARD entry when postin goods issue.
    You can enable/ disable this function with transaction OMB3 in the customizing.
    have fun
    Flo

  • HELP - Exchange Server 2007 Transport Rule Issue

    Hi all,
    sorry if here is not the place to put my question but I did not find another forum, so if anyone can help me I appreciate.
    - I have an Exchange Server 2007 SP3 environment with 1 MBX Server and 3 CAS/HUB Servers.
    - I have created a Transport Rule that said:
    "all emails that have @test.com in BCC field are dropped off except one group can send" .
    The issue is the rule doesn´t work.
    Anyone can help me, please?
    Thanks in advance.
    Luiz

    The Exchange previous versions forums are here: 
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/exchangeserverlegacy
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Exchange Server 2007 Transport Agent Issue

    This is the first time i am working on Exchange Server Development. Below is a simple Transport Agent that i am using, this agent should simply update the email Subjects
    as shown below in the code.
    using System;
    using System.Collections.Generic;
    using System.Text;
    using Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Transport;
    using Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Transport.Smtp;
    namespace MyAgents
    public sealed class MyAgentFactory : SmtpReceiveAgentFactory
    public override SmtpReceiveAgent CreateAgent(SmtpServer server)
    return new MyAgent();
    public class MyAgent : SmtpReceiveAgent
    public MyAgent()
    this.OnEndOfData += new EndOfDataEventHandler(MyEndOfDataHandler);
    private void MyEndOfDataHandler(ReceiveMessageEventSource source, EndOfDataEventArgs e)
    e.MailItem.Message.Subject = "This message passed through my agent: " + e.MailItem.Message.Subject;
    Below is the Powershell script i am using to install the Agent.
    Net Stop MSExchangeTransport
    Install-TransportAgent -Name MyAgent -AssemblyPath EmailLogger.dll -TransportAgentFactory MyAgents.MyAgentFactory
    Enable-TransportAgent -Identity MyAgent
    Net Start MSExchangeTransport
    Agent installed successfully using Exchange Management Shell.
    Now when i send/receive emails in exchange, Email subjects are not modified. Emails have their original subjects. I don't know why?
    I also performed the steps mentioned in below links to debug the Agent but breakpoints are not being hit by Visual Studio Debugger.
    sf-tools.net/Messaging/tabid/55/EntryId/163/Exchange-2010-Transport-Agent.aspx
    stackoverflow.com/questions/12347123/debugging-ms-exchange-2007-transport-agent
    omarjames.com/blog/index.php/debugging-exchange-transport-agent/
    My System Configuration
    I am using the Exchange Server 2007 Virtual Machine provided by Microsoft from link below
    microsoft.com/en-pk/download/details.aspx?id=14901
    I also installed the Visual Studio 2008 on the VM for debugging.
    Please help me in resolving the issue?

    How are you testing this ? a SmtpReceiveAgent will only fire when the server receives email over SMTP. So if your just logging on and sending an Internal Email (eg mailbox to mailbox) or sending Email externally then the
    SmtpReceiveAgent wont fire. For a single server if you want to capture all email you need to use a router agent see
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/postwoman/archive/2010/09/14/step-by-step-how-to-create-a-routing-agent.aspx
    . If you want to test what you have try sending an email to mailbox over SMTP using an SMTP client or Telnet
    http://exchange.mvps.org/smtp_frames.htm
    Cheers
    Glen

  • Transportable tablespace - Issue in impdp

    Hi guys,
    I need to transport the tablespace from 32 bit environmet (32 bit Linux and 32 bit Oracle) to 64 bit environment (Both 64 bit) as I am migrating to 64 bit.
    I have exported the tablesapce from 32 bit machine using expdp command. But I am getting below error while trying to import it on 64 bit environment
    ORA-39002: invalid operation
    ORA-31694: master table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_TRANSPORTABLE_01" failed to load/unload
    ORA-02354: error in exporting/importing data
    ORA-02373: Error parsing insert statement for table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_TRANSPORTABLE_01".
    ORA-00904: "ORIGINAL_OBJECT_NAME": invalid identifier
    Oracle version in 32 bit mc is : *11.1.0.7.0*
    Oracle version in 64 bit mc is : *11.1.0.6.0*
    Tablespace path in 32 bit mc was : /opt/oracleDBTable/tablespace/
    I have mounted this folder from 32 bit mc to same path on 64 bit mc using NFS.
    All tablespaces has been changed to read only and metadata file has been copied in binary mode to 64 bit mc.
    Can anyone Pls help me in resolving this issue..
    Regards,
    Suprith

    should this work..?? and what is the parameter "compatible=xyz" how should i use it ?I dont know from memory... the parameter to do exports for lower version databases might as well be named "version" - but you will find the answer in the fine documentation.
    See these links:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28319/dp_export.htm#i1007148
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28319/dp_overview.htm#CEGFCFFI
    Edit:
    Regarding your export command
    .... version=11.1.0.6.0;Are these collons ";" at the end a typo or really there?
    Ronny Egner
    My Blog: http://blog.ronnyegner-consulting.de
    Edited by: Ronny Egner on May 20, 2010 11:48 AM

  • Stock transport order issue

    Hi
    My bussiness process is i have created stock transport order purchase order in me21n t.code doc type UB,item category 'U'then i do mb11 t.code 351 movement type Transfer posting to stock in transit from unrestricted-use.then i do the goods receipt in migo t.code.
    Now my system taking goods receipt with Zero quantity without 351 movement goods not happening,is there any configuration i miss,
    Regards
    Sam

    Hi,
    For the STO , with 351 movement type its issue goods receipt from issuing plant n the stock will b in transit( on a way), so goods receipt will not happen in receiving plant and stock value is zero. For goods receipt to happen please do GR wrt 101 movement type. Then stcok will b updated.
    Hope this clears.
    Smitha

  • Transportable Tablespace Issue

    Hi all,
    I dont know somebody else has posted this error here before, I am sorry If so..
    I am getting an error when I am transporting tablespace's metadata... can anyone help me about this issue ?
    My OS is RH 4
    ======================================================================
    [oracle@localhost export]$ exp parfile=/home/oracle/oracle9i/backup/export/prams.dat
    Export: Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production on Mon Apr 28 13:33:23 2008
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    Username: sys as sysdba
    Password:
    Connected to: Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
    JServer Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
    Export done in US7ASCII character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
    Note: table data (rows) will not be exported
    About to export transportable tablespace metadata...
    EXP-00008: ORACLE error 1001 encountered
    ORA-01001: invalid cursor
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_SQL", line 819
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 19
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_TTS", line 774
    ORA-01187: cannot read from file 201 because it failed verification tests
    ORA-01110: data file 201: '/home/oracle/oracle9i/oradata/db1/dbf/temp01.dbf'
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_PLUGTS", line 1093
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    EXP-00000: Export terminated unsuccessfully
    ====================================================================
    My parameter file looks like below
    TRANSPORT_TABLESPACE=y
    TABLESPACES=users
    FILE=/home/oracle/oracle9i/backup/export/ts_users_28042008_10:04.dmp
    LOG=/home/oracle/oracle9i/backup/export/explog.log

    Check the similar sort of thread.
    Re: Transportable tablespace
    Regards,
    Sabdar Syed.

  • Abap transport release issue

    hello,
    i have a scenario where in my project, the crm development is happening. and for a single object there are about 4 people are working and there is a single transport request with 4 different tasks. Now that each folks are working individually and completing there task.. Now the developer1 completed his task and what to test it in quality but on release of the transport it started giving implication due to other TR tasks.
    Now we are unable to figure out how to resolove this activity where we can resolve this issue. also that there is yet another crm component the other 4 guys are working on..
    please let me know how to resolve this issue?
    best regards,
    kandaraj

    Hi Kandaraj,
    welcome to the club.
    We had this trouble for years. Then they started to use SAP Solution manager, everybody got training courses on how to use and we can not create transport requests or transport them without creating a minimum of 3 Solution manager processes with a dozen or so steps and workflow and partner assignment and assignment of testers, developers, process administrators with approvals, releases, and and and guess what we got?
    We have some 800% more of administrative overhead including full-time quaility managers.
    And nothing is better than it was before:
    We still face the task of unavoidable communication with people. I really hate all those developers, consultants and users.
    Why can't the system do the job?
    Have a nice weekend, live goes on.
    Clemens

  • Transport collection issue

    I would like to Trasnport an infoobject from Dev to Quality.
    I have given Source system assignment correctly.
    But when I am trying to collect all related ( i mean all attributes and attributes' attribute), it is giving the following error:
    Edit objects separately since they be
    original systems
    Choose 'Display object' or 'Cancel'.
    I tried in many ways to resolve this.. But I could not collect and almost the trasnport request has failed 4-5 times. Can any one help me how to resolve this.. Its very very urgent
    Thanks
    Ananya

    Hi Ananya,
    I too had the same issue. I worked on BI7.0 SP9 .
    I could solve this by taking few infoobjects at one time rather than taking all at a time. I could find the issues exists with few infoobject like 0PLANT, 0CALMONTH etc..
    Let me explain clearly to you now.
    I Collect the cube with necessary objects in transport connection
    First I select cube and first 10 infoobjects if this is sucessful then select next ten, if you find issue with 10 select five and narrow down the selection for infoobject that is causing the issues. the same needs to be done multiple number of times to collect all the object. I tried a lot but I could not find any other solution than this .
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    PV

  • Stock Transport Order - Issuing Storage Location

    Hi gurus -
    When raising a Stock Transport Order (UB type) and Issuing Storage Location is populated manually with an SLoc not extended for material in supplying plant, will system give an error or allow STO to be saved/created without throwing an error?
    Thanks,
    Karen

    Hey Karen!
    I am not sure if I understand your problem correctly.
    You do not want the system to create a new MARD entry when postin goods issue.
    You can enable/ disable this function with transaction OMB3 in the customizing.
    have fun
    Flo

  • Transport Import Issue

    Hi experts,
    I copied few existing query and saved in a request and moved that request to production. i was getting the below error.
    Element 4GRCTUYZ5W2EJF2QA2FUEI61Z is missing in version M.
    Element 4GRCTV6NOUO421M6FWI6OK4RR is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTVTP9QH8LX8IXEP7IQ0X3 is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTVM0QRVJ3AP2RKMV8O27B is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTVEC7T9TKO5MLQKIYM3HJ is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTURAMXGP0SJA48DI4G7C7 is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTPF9GWDZ35122CQZ533FR is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTU4921NKGWWXMQ6HAAB6V is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTWGQUMAD5SUVEWW8CVX2F is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTWOFDKW2OFEBKQYKMXVS7 is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTW1DSP2Y4JRZ38RJSRZMV is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTW92BNONN6BF92TW2TYCN is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTOS7W0KUJ9EPKUJYAX7AF is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTP7KXXS9KIHLWIOMV14PZ is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTUBXL099ZJGDSK8TKC9WN is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTUJM3YUZI5ZTYEB5UE8MF is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTO56B4RPZDSD3CCXGRB53 is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTOCUU3DFI0BT96F9QT9UV is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTOZWEZ6K1VY5QOMAKZ607 is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTOKJD1Z50MV9F0HM0V8KN is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTQPCMO086W9R1D50TEVQF is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTRCE7JTCQRW3IVC1NKRVR is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTR4POL7N85CND19PDIT5Z is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTXYIJCIBS6N0JRCMB9O2V is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTA9W2NKNCOO6K24RB7MLJ is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTY672B41AT6GPLEYLBMSN is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTQHO3PEIO9QAVJ2OJCX0N is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTPUMITLE4E3YE0VNP70VB is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTPMXZUZOLRKI86TBF525J is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTQ2B1S73N0NEJUXZZ8ZL3 is missing in version M
    Element 4GRCTQ9ZKQST5N6UPP0C9AYAV is missing in version M
    How to fix this issue.
    Regards,
    Anand

    Do i need to create a new transport request or can i use the old one.
    if i have to use the old one. how to use the old one, its already released.
    one more thing. i have copied these queries with all calculated key figures, restricted keyfigures. these keyfigures already available in the production with the original query.
    now do i have to transport all or the query alone.
    Regards,
    Anand

  • Transport InfoArea Issue

    Hello All,
    I have an issue I can't seem to figure out. I have an infoArea with a bunch of different infoareas under it. the problem I am running into is that there are also some DSO's within the infoarea as well.
    So here is my setup:
    DEV --> Infoarea with a bunch of info areas below it (I moved the DSO's that were under this infoarea to somewhere else)
    QA --> Infoarea with a bunch of info areas below it (however the DSO's in QA are still within the infoarea)
    QUSTION: Is there a way to transport the folder structure as I have it in DEV without having to activate everything once it gets into QA...so basically I want to take a picture of what I have in dev and move it to QA without the hassle of activating everything?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hello
    If you transport the related objects to QA, you do not have to activate any thing manually there. Make sure all the objects you want to transport are active in development system.
    Also, while collecting the objects in Transport connection, tick the objects which you want to transport.
    There should be any problem...
    Hope this helps
    Cheers

  • Transport charges issue

    Hi
    I have a issue where, po will be sent to the vendor in which transportation charges will not be included and vendor will send the material to the client but the transportation charges will have to be payed by my client on the spot to the lorry driver, how can I deal with it in SAP

    Hi
    Maintain a partner function in the vendor master.
    U create a normal PO and GR and IR
    Transportation expenses can be done in unplanned delivery costs in MIRO.
    Or otherwise try it with F-53 for paymets.
    Regards,
    Raman

  • Custom Form Transport Render issues

    I have transported a custom wpc form from our Development server to our testing server.  After the transport all content items created with this custom form are displaying an error:
    Cannot render container:   An error occurred while loading the document from the resource content.
    Testing is supposed to start today but obviously can't until this issue is fixed - could someone please point me in the right direction for fixing this error?

    Hi TA,
    Please refer to the SAP Note : Note 1135576 - Transport of pages that contain iView references
    Also, refer to this thread
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/thread?messageID=7078924#7078924
    Cheers!
    Sandeep Tudumu

  • Transport (STMS) issue + Hang

    Hi,
    From last two days we are facing issue with transport management system. There are two transport sitting in queue and not getting imported. Every time transport process run. It some how remain in the active state and never does anything. we tried to troubleshoot this issue and found that there is 1 record sitting in table trbat which should not be there.
    . Also, there may be some other problem which needs to be fixed in order to TMS system work properly.
    I have run se16> trbat>enter>execute>it display
    Table:          TRBAT
    Displayed fields:   9 of  10  Fixed columns:                2  List width 0250
       TRKORR               FUNCTION RETCODE TIMESTMP       CLIENT LANGU VARIANT        ARGUMENT   LOGNAME
       HEADER               P        F       20080908090346                                        :D:T:S:tmp:F:P080908.C2Q
    (Is it neccesary to delete this if yes can u tell me how to delete this?)
    I click on table enetry but delete button is inactive
    So, Pl. look into it urgently and do the needful as this is causing business issue.
    Regards
    mohsin mulani
    Edited by: mohsin mulani on Oct 2, 2008 2:26 AM

    Hi,
    You need to do the following checks and then proceed accordingly:
    1. Check the transport logs under transport directory for the above
    long running requests (/usr/sap/trans/log or /usr/sap/trans/tmp).
    2. Check whether Transport routes are configured properly, using STMS transaction. Also, perform the connection test, tp tool and RFC connections.
    3. Execute RSTPTEST program to check the STMS configuration.
    To clear the inconsistency and long running tp process , proceed as below.
    i. verify whether any tp is running at OS level. kill all the tp
    process which is running at the OS level (Ensure there is no transport done during this time).
    ii. Move all the files from /usr/sap/trans/tmp to some temporary
    backup directory.
    iii. Go to STMS -> import overview -> go to ->import monitor and
    delete the old entries.
    Then review the SAP Note 690449 for any .LOB file that is locking the tp.
    Please award points if helpful.
    Thanks, Dibya

Maybe you are looking for