On VA01 transfer an value from Condition type Z000 from sub-item to main it

Hi,
I want to create a sales order and I have one main item an one promotion (sub-item) item without determination price. I want to transfer cost price from VPRS form sub-item to an Z000 contidion to main item for tranfer this value to CO_PA for a field value different from VPRS field value.
How can i do this?
Thanks in advance.
Catarina Alves

Hi,
In copy controls of Del to Bill - VTFL .... in the item screen copy control.... u have a button called cumulate coast set this for the item u need to transfer i.e to item category of subitem u have.
Reward if helpful
Please find the help for this "Cumulate Cost" below -
Cumulate cost
This field is used in the main item to control whether the cost value (usually condition type VPRS) is to be copied from the relevant sub-items. The following cases are taken into account:
Free of charge sub-items (free goods)
Batch split items
Bill of material components
This function is needed especially if the sub-items involved are not relevant for billing. In this case the costs of these sub-items do not appear in CO-PA or the statistics.
Reward if helpful
Krishna

Similar Messages

How the freight cost are transferred from condition type of shipment cost document to service entry sheet and collected in service PO item

Dear Experts:
could you please share with me the knowledge for below topic:
How the freight cost are transferred from condition type of shipment cost document to service entry sheet and collected in service PO item, because these three objects use three different pricing procedures, and different condition type.
how did the condition type of service entry sheet know to copy the value of whcih condition type in the pricing procedure of shipment cost document?
Is this SAP standard function OR there need an enhancement to do that?
I didn’t find related condition value copy setting in background, could you please share related setting with me? Thank you very much for your kind help!
Best regards,
Andy

Hi, Gopi,
Glad to see your feedback, but i still have question on your feedback:
which condition type in the pricing procedure of service entry sheet should know to capture the net value of shipment cost doc? becasue there are so many condition types,
And i have checked the corresponding condition type (PRSX) of service entry sheet pricing procedure in my SAP system, this is a self-defined condition type, but NO any calculation routine maintained for the condition type (PRSX), how did the condition type (PRSX) know to copy the total cost of shipment cost document?
Below is the example and another question:
what the relationship between the pricing procedures at service PO item level and service line item level?
1. The freight cost in shipment cost document—including used condition type and pricing procedure
The pricing procedure of shipment cost document
2. The freight cost in service entry sheet—including used condition type and pricing procedure
The pricing procedure of service entry sheet--the pricing procedure at service line item level
3. The freight cost in service PO item—including used condition type and pricing procedure:

Copy value of condition type to another condition type *Not Percentage*

Hi SAP community!
How can I copy the value of a condition type to another condition type in my pricing procedure? The rules are that these conditions are not Percentage. The calculation type is Quantity for the two conditions.
I want to copy the value of condition type PMIN (Minimum Price) to another Z condition type.
Thank you all

Hi Lakshmipathi;
In fact, there are two Z conditions that I need to have with the same value of the PMIN. I 've maintained my pricing procedure this way:
For the PMIN, the step is 320
For the ZPV1, the step is 920 and I put in "From " field 320 and in the "To" field 320
For the ZPV0, the steo is 925 and I put in "From " field 320 and in the "To" field 320
But when I looked the Conditions Tab in the sales order there is no value copied to the Z conditions.
In order to do this, my Z conditions do not need an access sequence assigned, right?

Transfer Pricing through PCA condition Types

Hi,
Can any one send me some Documentation on Transfer Pricing Through PCA Condition Types.
Little urgent please
Regards

Hi
Find the following documentation on Transfer Pricing.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/eb/13811243c411d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.htm
Regards,
Suraj

Condition Type for Service PO Items

Hi all expert,
May i know that where to define the condition type for Service PO items?
For item of service PO, there have Service Tab, under this tab, there may have few items and each of the item have condition type. thus, i would like to know that where to define this condition type. it is because i found that this condition type is different with PO condition type.
Hope can get ur reply soon.
Thanks~

Hi,
Appreciated for your reply:)
I am confusing on "Variable Condition Schema For External Service" Step, as i view from the table, it seem look like a access sequence and assign to which document type to use pricing procedures.
If let's say i assigned this pricing procedures to PO category and normal PO document type, then does it crash with condition type which config for normal PO (Condition Tab of PO)?
if i assigned my procedures at "Variable Condition Schema For External Service" Step, where i can view my config result?
Waiting for your reply.
Thanks:)

Same condition type on header and item level = printing problem

Hi
I have a customer using some condition types on both item level and header level in quotations, orders, invoices ...
In the pricing procedures it is customized (V_T683S-DRUKZ) that the conditions must be printed on header level (that is at the bottom of the documents).
My job is to make the Smartform to print the documents, and I want it of course to be as close to SAP standard as possible.
SAP standard will print these conditions on header level even if the conditions are at item level, but my customer wants the conditions created on header level to be printed on header level and conditions created on item level to be printed on item level.
I'm no pricing expert, so my question is:
Will it be fair if I tell the customer that using the same condition types on header and item level is bad practices - or at least bad karma?
Best regards
Thomas Madsen Nielsen

Hi Shiva Ram and Madhu
I have no problem understanding header vs. item conditions, so I really don't see anything in oss note 876617, that is relevant in this case.
Madhu - I do not agree that everything is fine. My issue is that I want to stick as closely to SAP standard customizing as possible. In SAP standard customizing of a condition type you can use the flag V_T683S-DRUKZ to determine if the condition should be printed on header OR item level - you can not choose both header AND item level.
I have a SAP standard smartform using two functions modules for reading header and item conditions. RV_PRICE_PRINT_ITEM and RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD. These function modules are based on the DRUKZ customizing flag and a condition marked for printing on header level will be supplied by RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD even when the condition is on item level.
My point is: SAP standard customizing does not support printing of same condition on both header and item level. I can of course write tons of code to work around this problem, but that would be bad practices

Standard Memo Lines read account from Transaction type not from memo accoun

Standard Memo Lines read account from Transaction type not from memo account
Is There Away To Readed From Memo lines account
Facts:
Define New Standard Memo Lines with Name "Discounts"
With Type: Line
Revenue Account: 01.0.000.0000.000.411001.0000
Active Date: 01-JAN-2007
When I create transaction with class Invoice
I select the transaction type, and select customer
I press on line items button
I open the list description I select the "discount" define as memo line, I save the transactions
I press on the Complete Button
After that I navigate to Distributions button
I found the account affect not read from account define for memo lines. It read from revenue account define in transaction type
Especially when I use memo lines, how to read revenue account from account assign to memo lines not from transaction type

Standard Memo Lines read account from Transaction
type not from memo account
Is There Away To Readed From Memo lines account
Facts:
Define New Standard Memo Lines with Name "Discounts"
With Type: Line
Revenue Account: 01.0.000.0000.000.411001.0000
Active Date: 01-JAN-2007
When I create transaction with class Invoice
I select the transaction type, and select customer
I press on line items button
I open the list description I select the "discount"
define as memo line, I save the transactions
I press on the Complete Button
After that I navigate to Distributions button
I found the account affect not read from account
define for memo lines. It read from revenue account
define in transaction type
Especially when I use memo lines, how to read revenue
account from account assign to memo lines not from
transaction typeHi,
In my opinion, we need to set up AUTOACCOUNTING for 'REVENUE' as standard lines so that system picks up Revenue account from Standard memo lines instead of Transaction type.
Regards,
Sreenivas

How get the condition type of PO's item

Dear All,
I want to get the condition type of PO's item.
I have checked the EKPO, there is Purchasing Info Record but no Purchasing info record category(esokz) that is the key of in table A017.
How can i get the Purchasing info record category(esokz) of PO's item?
Thank you in advance.

Hi,
Purchase info records are stored in EINA and EINE table. The field you are looking for is in table EINE.
Hope this helps.
ashish

COPA - Split of Value from condition type into different value fields

Dear All,
Customer is having several free schemes to customer the same is set up by SD and Cost of free goods is attached to One Z condition type, this flows along with Main product as characteristic. So we have Main product cost in VPRS and Scheme cost in Z Condition and there is possibility of more than one scheme cost flowing in one Z condition for single billing document. Whereas customer request is to see the each scheme cost separately in COPA. Since Value from SD will be flowing through only one condition type , it will be difficult to me to Split this in COPA. We have given a thought of having more than one condition type from SD ( one Z condition for one scheme) but this resolve our issue at hand. If we look at long term whenever customer introduces new Scheme new condition type need to be created and related COPA changes etc, Which doesn't seem to be working out.
Request Experts help in this, thanks in advance for the help.

Hi Santosh
Having a Z cond type for each scheme is preferrable.... This would address the issue with Standard SAP itself...
Reason being, if you dont do that, then you will have to maintain a mapping somewhere in a Z Table where by system would come to know of the ratio between the schemes... This will be more cumbersome to develop and maintain... Still you wanna do that, here is the logic....
Maintain the schemes in a Z Table... Where each scheme will have a scheme ID - The ratio applicable to various schemes and also the relevant value fields of COPA to be updated for each scheme....
Now, add a Custom Field to the Sales Order and while creating the SO this field needs to be updated with the scheme ID(Relevant Exit to make it mandatory MV45AFZZ / ZB).... If Scheme ID is populated, your Billing should read the Split from Z Table using Exit RV60AFZZ and Update COPA using Exit COPA0002
br, Ajay M

Value from condition types not to be added to material price

Hi friends,
I have a Pricing procedure for Cross company stock transfers.
Supplying plant put some margin on the material price and will supply it.
Now My question is how to avoid the value of the margin getting inventorized(adding to the material price) in the receiving plant
As iam using Std price for this FERT material in the receiving plant , it is trying to inventorize.
I have assigned an Account key and accrual key , for this margin condition type in my pricing procedure.
many thanks
Manish

Hi
In Transaction code, M/08.....for your Pricing procedure and for that particular condition type ....Check Statistical Indicator..
In Transaction code: M/06.....For your particular condition type and go into detail....In control Data:2 tab, check Accurals also..
Hope this will help you to meet your requirement.
Reward if useful
Regards
S.Baskaran

To Restrict Duplicate & Without Value Manual Condition Type in ME21N

Hi Friends,
While making a stock transfer (purchase order) by ME21N from supplying plant (Factory) to other plant (depot), if user make mistake & donu2019t put value for Manual condition type ZMRP, system accept & save the order.
Afterwards when he realizes the same or immediately come to know about not putting value & put again, system take that second line entry also & create double entry.
When invoice come then it pick the value from first line & show in negative.
How it is possible to restrict it at order level only to not to allow 0 value & repeat entry for the same condition type?
I have triedu2026.
1. At pricing procedure, there ZMRP is required entry.
2. Condition Type - ZMRP, there is _ No Limitations
We can not put D Not possible to process manually or fix this condition type as then we have to maintain condition record & prices are varies depot to depot & day by day.
3. Since this is a Header Condition, so canu2019t restrict at Access Sequence level.
This is only has to put manually by user according to the instruction of sales department.
Got Suggestion to change at user exit level to put check at delivery to not to allow printing or invoicing by putting 0 value/without any value.
Please suggest at configuration level only as itu2019s difficult to create User Exit for all requirement.
Srivastav
+91-9694096833

Hi,
You must update the forum how did you solved the issue as it will help others also in future.
This is good practice.
Regards
Sanjay

How to prevent copy of value into condition in PO from prev PO

Hi
I have a manual pricing condition in the Purchase Order. Whenever I am creating a new PO, system is bringing the value of the condition from the last PO. How do I prevent this? I have set the condition as manual in pricing schema, set manual entry takes precendence in the condition type, set the condition type amount/percent as editable/deletable already.
Since the value gets copied from last PO value, sometimes users without realizing this are making another entry for the same condition manually and hence PO is ending up with two values for the same condition type.
Pl. advise
Sriram

Hi,
Sol : IMG > MM > Purchasing > Enviornment data > Default values for buyers > setting s for default values > select 01 click on detail icon > click on price adoption tab make it as donot copy
Regards
AKM

On Net value: Discount Condition Type

Hi,
I would like to know whether the below requirement can be fulfilled with the standard SD configuration.
As far as I know all discount condition types calculates on Gross value. But I have a discount condition type (lets say 123 = Special Discount) which should calculate based on Net value. I can create a step after Netvalue but the problem I see is, how the system calculates Output tax
eg.
10 PR00
20 ABC (Customer discount)
30 XYZ (Material discount)
40 Discount Sum
50 Net Value
60 123 (Special Discount)
70 MWST (output tax)
So if I place discount type 123 after Net value, I think it will calculate on net value, but the problem might come with MWST as it cant calculates on Netvalue but on 123. Am I right? I knew it can be done with the ABAPer help. But I would like to know whether it can be done with standard (alrady predefined) SAP configuration. (by assigning any routine or some settings in Pricing procedure determination in V/08 ???)
Thank you.

Hi santosh
Sub total will the PR00 - Discount sum
Net price will be Sub total - Special discount
how do I mention that sub total will be PR00 - Discount. I configure like this
10 PR00
20 ABC (Customer discount)
30 XYZ (Material discount)
40 Discount Sum from20 to39
50 Sub total
60 123 (Special Discount)
70 Net price
80 MWST (output tax)
90 Total
when I indicate from 20 to 39 besides Discount Sum, system will sum the discounts between step 20 to 39. How do I write at sub total like this, so that system will deduct the discount sum from PR00. Similary how do I write Sub total - Special discount.
Could you please explain bit more detail.
Thank you.

Incorrect value for condition type P101 in Stock Transport order

Hello Friends,
We have a scenario where in transfering material from one plant to another using the STO way , the excise duty from the sending plant should be loadded on the inventory of the receiving plant.
In this scenario the excise duty X% is calculated on the condition type P101 (which is the standard price or the moving average price from the material master accounting view)
Giving below a sample cas e for the error occuring:-
- Suppose a material M1 has stock of 5,00,000 EA of total value 2,03,707.16 inr , thus the moving average price calculated by the system is 0.41 inr per unit.
- When i try to create the Stock transport order for this material the P101 condition value now appears as 2,05,000 inr for same 5,00,000 Quantity
If we check the difference between the material master value and condition value their is a difference of 1292.84
As mentioned the excise duty(X%) is now getting calcuated on 2,05,000 . When we do post goods issue against the delivery created for the stock transport order the inventory value posted is from the material master i.e 2,03,707.16 , but the excise value are calculated on 2,05,000 in the Purchase.
This difference in value between the condition P101 in PO and the actual inventory posting value is resulting in incorrect calcuation of the excise duty.
can some help me regarding this issue.
regards,

Dear Gundam,
This might accured due to the rounding off problem, so please chek the rounding off condition type is available in the invoice or not.
If not plaese maintain the rounding off condition type sames as in the sales order then try.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Invoice blocked for qty reason, but condition type deleted from the PO

Hi Gurus,
I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
2. Invoice posted against the PO.
3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
4. Goods receipt posted
5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
Regards,
Greg

Gregory Mathews wrote:
Hi Gurus,
>
> I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
> The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
>
> The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
>
> 1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
> 2. Invoice posted against the PO.
> 3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
> 4. Goods receipt posted
> 5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
>
> Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
Hi Greg,
Are there any a/c entries showing in GR a/c doc for this cond type? I think it could be a bug when you run the ASN Idoc. Try to un-check Delete indicator for FRB1 which would stop it getting deleted.
Regards
Shiva

On VA01 transfer an value from Condition type Z000 from sub-item to main it

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for