One business system and two FTP server locations

Hi,
We have one business system and two FTP server locations related to it. We have to send two different messages to this business system.
It has to be send to both the ftp server locations.
How do we configure the receiver determination and receiver agreements ?
Do we need two receiver Business systems for this?
How do we configure the receiver agreements especially?
Urgent
Regards,
John

hi
1) you must create 2 CC, each one to one FTP server.
2) how you send diferent message to each FTP yo only have to define 2 Reveiver determination, and two Interface Determination.
3)one sender Agreement
4)2 receiver agreement.
take in mind you only have 1 BS you must create 2 receiver determination, else if have 2 one receiver would be enouhgt
Thanks
Rodrigo

Similar Messages

  • Connect one Business system with two Integration Server

    Hello,
    Can we able to connect one Business System with two Integration Server?
    I have one Business system (ECC 6.0 with the client 900) and it is already connected with PI 7.0 system.Can I able to connect the same sytem (with same client) with PI7.1?
    I want to do the HTTP Connection for ABAP Proxy for this two XI system with one business Sytem ?
    Is this possible ?Is there any work around solution there?
    Thanks.

    Hello ,
    This document describes about connecting with Two PI7.1 system using Application Server 7.1 and Application Server 7.0 SP14  .
    I want to connect same ECC system via abap proxy with two different PI system .One is PI7.0 and another one is PI7.1 system.
    Is this possible if i use Application Server 7.1 or Application Server 7.0 SP14  ?
    Thanks.
    Lakshmi
    Edited by: Muthulakshmi Pandi on Apr 16, 2009 11:48 PM
    Edited by: Muthulakshmi Pandi on Apr 17, 2009 12:21 AM

  • Can One Business system have two technical systems assigned to it

    Can One Business system have two technical systems assigned to it

    hi,
    the technical system describes the physical view and the business system the logical view, respectively.
    So in most cases you must define both but while a technical system can only link to one WEB AS, more than one business systems can link to the same technical system.
    But one Business System can have only one technical system.
    Logical system for senders and receivers in XI can be defined as business systems which is associated with technical systems. You may req to create BS for identifying individual senders and recievers. Technical system is gateway having the technical details and it is in the ID we designate it to be either a sender or a receiver.
    Follow the link below to learn moer on it:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/97/9d84494b9f45caabe0713296d89b72/content.htm
    Regards
    Mamta
    Edited by: Mamta Yadav on Sep 12, 2008 11:13 AM

  • One Sender system and two receivers system scenario. Pls help

    Hello,
    I have One Sender system and two receivers system scenario.
    My sender is RFC (sync) in nature.
    My one receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
    My second receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
    Pls tell me and send me links/docs for this scenario.
    Regards

    Hi Rick,
    For two receivers you require 2 interface determination, receivers determinations etc.
    Go through these threads for one sender and multiple receivers:
    one sender and two receiver
    /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
    Then configure your RFC communication channel in XI system + activate it and after that using all same parameters make an TCP/IP RFC destinatioon on R3 side.
    Rewrads if found helpful.
    BR,
    Alok

  • I have One Sender system and two receivers system scenario. Pls help

    Hello,
    I have One Sender system and two receivers system scenario.
    My sender is RFC (sync) in nature.
    My one receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
    My second receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
    How to proceed with this.
    If my second receiver is async then how to proceed with this.
    Regards

    Hi Rick !
    Depending on your requierements, you can create a BPM that
    1) receives request from sender
    2) sends request to receiver 1 / receives response from receiver 1
    3) sends request to receiver 2 / receives response from receiver 2
    4) do some processing with both responses
    5) sends response to sender.
    If your second receiver is async, just use an async send step in step 3. As far as I know, you cannot use multimapping with sync scenarios.
    Regards,
    Matias.
    ps: please award points if helpful

  • One Sender system and two receivers system(Sync) . Pls help

    Hello All,
    Help required to make one scenario in XI.
    Currently there is one interface (XI is not used) that is already in place.
    CRM sender system
    DM and ERP Receiver systems.
    CRM RFC call DM RFC directly and same CRM RFC call ERP RFC directly.
    Result (can be error or correct)is returned back to CRM RFC from DM and ERP RFC's.
    Now I want to make this scenario in XI.
    If I make without BPM I get message 'Multiple receivers are not allowed for Sync systems in Receiver Determination.
    Pls advice how to make this scenario with Error an Exception Handling.
    Regard

    Rick,
    this makes no sense - there must be some differentiation. It woudn't be necessary only if there was one function, which first calls DM and then calls ERP and both calls would be done INSIDE this one function.
    I meant, that you have only one function, which calls both systems - I mean - the same interface would call the system... Do you know what I mean?
    Whatever..
    I have a better solution for you. Do you know what ABAP proxies are? Let's do it this way and it will be the easiest and most reliable way.
    Create 2 interfacec - one will call DM and one ERP. Develop 2 separate scenarios. No conditions - Just 2 simple scenarios. On the CRM system go to t-code sproxy. (eeee, hope you have an SAP CRM and have configured settings to be able to develop proxy objects.)
    Generate proxies and replace current functions by calling the proxy objects' methods.
    This is of course possible only if u have
    a, CRM from SAP
    b, configured settings XI<->CRM (usually does basis team)
    Ok, again one thing: CHECK how your current scenario work - how are the calls made.. I believe, there are 2 different calls in one function, so when the function in CRM is ran, first call is made and then the second. But forget this general function, because it is not the interface. The interfaces are the functions which really try to send and receive data. And they simply CAN'T be the same, otherwise it wouldn't be possible for CRM to know, to which system should be the call made to!!! So, ask you colleagues for THESE TWO calls. If they tell you, no, there is only one call, which is general (which is bullshit, because it simply can't - again, there must be at least some flag or what), then just tell them - ok, this is not possible. I need a flag to be able to differentiate the messages (and this will be the condition in receiver determination) or simply let them to develop for you 2 independent function. ! for call to DM and 1 to call to ERP. You will then create 2 separate scenarios and they will use these 2 functions in their one general or whatever...
    ufffff
    Peter

  • Same Business system to two XI/PI landscapes and possibly two ESR's

    Hello,
    We are setting up a new PI 7 landscape in parallel to our current XI 3 landscape.
    We do not foresee a migration of XI to PI in the short run so the two systems, XI and PI will run next to each other.
    The problem we then have is with the ESR and proxies. The same business system must be able to connect to both XI and PI and must also be able to generate proxies with interface content from XI as well as with interface content from PI.
    The connection from business system to ESR repository seems to be 1:1, only one ESR per business system (defined via SXMB_ADM)
    Is there a way to allow ESR content from two XI/PI systems in one business system simultaneously?
    How do we solve this issue?
    Thanks
    Tom

    Hi Tom,
    as you already said its 1:1 connection between ESR and business system. The connection is taken from the exchangeProfile, refer to [ABAP Proxy Generation on SAP help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/555f3c482a7331e10000000a114084/content.htm].
    I suggest you to create the interfaces in XI, generate the proxies and transport to PI.
    How are you going to use the to integration servers for ABAP proxy scenarios? I am asking because you only can use one integration server at a time for outbound ABAP proxies in SAP standard. You define the URL or RFC destination to the corresponding integration server in SXMB_ADMIN.
    Regards, Martin

  • Business Systems and Business Service - does any difference

    Hi Experts,
                      Could any one please guide me what is the difference between
    Business Systems
    and
    Business Service.
    Which situations we use Business Systems / Business Service.
    Does it have any performance issues?
    Why we are not configuring Business service in SLD?
    Cheers Experts!!
    Sunil

    Hi Sunil,
    Business System: Address a particular business system as the sender or receiver of messages.
    A business system is an actual application system in a system landscape. A business system
    (service) comprises information about the inbound and outbound interfaces and the software
    component versions of the business system. The business system services are used when
    configuring internal company processes.
    Business Systems are Logical Senders or Receivers that exchange messages by using the Integration
    Server and that are entered in the System Landscape Directory.
    The Business Systems in the System Landscape Directory relate to a system landscape.
    The Business Systems of business partners are therefore not entered in the System Landscape
    Directory. To be able to address such business partners logically, use communication components in
    the Integration Directory. A business system is a way of specifying a communication component in the
    Integration Directory more precisely (business system component).
    Business Service: Address an abstract business entity as the sender or receiver of messages.
    Using a business service, you can define the technical or business subunits of the companies
    involved and then assign them the relevant interfaces. The business services are used when
    configuring cross-company processes.
    In the PCK, the Service is of type Business Service. It represents an abstract, addressable unit.
    Business services are used in cross-company processes, for example, if the parties involved have only
    published their interfaces and not their system landscape, or it is only partly known.
    Using a Business Service,we can define the technical or business subunits of the companies involved
    and then assign them the relevant interfaces.
    It is useful to use Business Services when configuring cross-company processes. Usually, the
    interface descriptions of the business partners involved are made publicly available.
    Also,There is already lot of thread regarding the same discussion, please see it below.
    Business service or Business system??
    Re: Business Service <--> Business System
    Difference between Business service, Business system and Business process
    Business Service vs Business System in Integration Directory.
    Business Service (vs) Business System in Integration Directory.
    What is the difference between Business System and Business Service?
    business system and business service
    Diff b/w Business service & Business System?
    Regards,
    Vinod.

  • Business System and Client

    Hi
    I checked many treads and still I couldn't get a satisfactory explanation to the difference between Business System and Client. I read in help.sap site that multiple business systems can be assigned to a single technical system and also each numbered client of an SAP system is a Unique Business System ? So are client and business system one ? If so why use it interchangably ? And if many business systems can be assigned to the technical system how do we specify a related Integration Server ? As I understand only one Business System can be assigned Integration server. So if we assign many business systems to one technical system then how can we have related Integration server for all ? I couldn't get a satisfactory explanation to this doubt in any thread in this forum
    Midhun

    >>each numbered client of an SAP system is a Unique Business System ?
    It could be. But it is not necessary that each client of SAP system is communicating with PI. If it is then there will be one Business System for each client.
    >> So are client and business system one ?
    No. Client is more substantial category in SAP system. Business system just defines the logical name to these clients if they communicate with PI.
    >> If so why use it interchangably ?
    Actually they can't be used interchangably always. The only relation is that for each client of SAP system, there could be only one Business system.
    >>And if many business systems can be assigned to the technical system how do we specify a related Integration Server ?
    For related Integration Server name, you need to select the PI Business system name which would communicate with your business system. For a single SLD scenario you will see PI Dev, Q and Prod business systems.
    >> As I understand only one Business System can be assigned Integration server.
    Correct. Its a PI Business system.
    >> So if we assign many business systems to one technical system then how can we have related Integration server for all ?
    For all Business systems of 1 technical system, you need to select the same PI Business system name.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Difference between Business System and Business Service in ID

    There are some tiny little doubts for a newbie which usually appear and we don't really have the answer.
    We know that sometimes we two ways to implement a process, and it works for the two ways, but we not always understand why.
    This was one of my doubts, what was the great difference between a Business System and a Business Service...?
    Of course I had a tiny little idea but now I have the answer and maybe it will be useful to anyone who questioned about it...
    A Business System is defined in the SLD and is used as sender and receiver in the ID. However in some cases, the details of the implementing application are not available(in a B2B communication, where the system belongs to a different company. A Business Service represents an abstract entity for adressing the senders and receivers of messages. Therefore, when using Business Servces, it is no longer necessary to define any Business Systems in the SLD.

    Hi Goncalo,
    one important difference is that a business service has no SLD entries and so also no assigned products/SWCVs. So the configuration in IB Directory can become uncomfortable if there a lot interfaces.
    Regards,
    Udo

  • Business Systems and Related Integration Servers

    Each Standalone Business System has a corresponding Related Integration Server.
    Suppose I am Developing a scenario for a Business System in the development environment, I have a related XI Development Integration Server (call it XD1) then I want to transport the changes to the test environment. Since this business system is defined to only point to XD1 as the integration server, in the test environment I want it to use the Test Integration Server (call it XD2). But the Business SYstem is pointing to XD1 only!
    What I am saying is: Given that one Business System only points to one Integration Server, do I need one Business System for Development (call it BS_DEV), and one for test (call it BS_TST)?
    Kind Regards,
    Tony.

    If you have only 1 sld and you want to move the XI objects from development(XIDEV) to Quality(XIQA).
    you will have to define the 2 business system groups and the related transport targets in the SLD..
    1st transport group XIDEV    --  
    BS_DEV will have XIDEV as the integration server.
    2nd transport group XIQA  --  
    BS_QA will have XIQA as the integration server.
    So you will have to name the business system differently as DEV and QA
    Some references
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ef/a21e3e0987760be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    /people/sap.india5/blog/2005/11/03/xi-software-logistics-1-sld-preparation
    Cheer's

  • SLD:  recreate deleted Business System of type Integration Server

    Hi,
    accidentally i deletet the business system of type "Integration Server" in the SLD. And i can't recreate it. It always says:
    "Integration Server already defined There is already an integration server defined for the selected technical system. Please select role Application System."
    Any ideas to create such a business system?
    The old one isn't there in the list, after i deleted it.
    regards,
    ms

    Hi,
    If you change/delete the host name of the Integration Server after the installation in either the SLD or the exchange profile, you must adjust it accordingly in the exchange profile or the SLD, respectively
    Maintaining a Business System for the Integration Server
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/9b/da0f41026df223e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Regarding Integration server in Business System  
    Regarding Integration server in Business System
    Refer editing the Business System
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/59/2cb3a3c93a4c7086500b8345143418/frameset.htm
    Thanks
    Swarup
    Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Jul 7, 2008 2:03 PM

  • Only one business system for outbound java proxies?

    Hi!
    I have a problem regarding java proxy runtime JPR.
    When I call the deployed outbound proxy from a client program, the java proxy sender service is always one defined business system. even if that has nothing to do with the business systems used by the proxy.
    For example: I define a business system on the Web AS, which is responsible for the java proxy communication, this is the bean defacto. When I call this bean from a client the JPR calls the Integration Server using another business systems channel. Of course I get the runtime exception service unavailable, because it is not used in interface determination, as the sending channel. If I use the 'working' business systems channel it works just fine
    I hope you get my problem.
    If I enter the Adapter Monitor, then choose the JPR I can see under Cache that the working business system has several entries here.
    Where is the difference between the one working system and others, has anybody ever faced this problem?
    regards
    Stefan

    When you call an outbound java proxy bean, the sender business system is usually derived from the business system which is connected to the technical system Web AS Java in SLD.
    If you want another sender business system, then you can set this with the application program with help of the message specifier class (look at manual for further details).
    I recommend writing a wrapper bean around the generated proxy bean classes to enable the sending application program to provide the business system as a parameter. In that way different senders can provide their business system separately.
    Regards
    Stefan

  • One Business System Per Client

    Going in, I figured I could have multiple business systems tied to a single technical system.  For example, if I have a techical system (SAP R/3) of RD0 110, and I want to have one business system for a vendor price check, another for sending ship notice idocs to a 3rd party server, etc.
    When I go to add a second Business System to RD0 110 in SLD, I get an error that "The selected client already has a business system. Select a different client or system.".
    Where am I going wrong?

    Hi Keith,
    the problem you are running in is that the SLD checks your business system entries against used client and logical system from tech.system. If one is already used in a link to a bus.system SLD does not allow to link the same tech. system to another bus.system.
    But you don´t have unique namespaces for each scenario.
    You will import the SWCV from SLD into Int.Rep..
    Then you can define a range of namespaces in the SWCV object.
    In each namespace you can implement a scenario.
    The SWCV is connected to a bus. system, that s right.
    But the scenario will not only work with one bus.system.
    Usually you will use the SWCV to build up a scenario in Int.Rep. for the sender system providing the scenario with data.
    The bus. systems defined in the SLD  are more relevant in the Int.Directory, when implementing the comm.channels and building up the interface-/sender-/receiver-determinations per scenario.
    If you could connect a tech. system to several business systems what could be the advantage? The tech.system is basis for connecting to SWCVs.
    We had the same question here in the beginning of our project but our result was that the multi bus.system connect to a tech. system would only produce more need of organizing the structure in the SLD.
    We put the focus on naming conventions in the namespaces to separate the different scenarios for the same bus.system as data provider (=sender).
    If more than one system is sending the same date in a business scenario you need to establish that in having a well defined definition (agreements) in the Int. Repository!
    Hope this can help!
    Best regards
    Dirk

  • Differentiate b/w Technical System, Business System and Business Service

    Hi all,
    I'm new to XI. I was asked two questions. Any one answer the following, plzz.
    a) Difference between Business System and Business Service
    b) Difference between Technical System and Business System

    Hello Gopi,
    a) Business System is a logical representation of a Technical System.
        Business Service is a abstract representation of a System. For instance, www.google.com have a several system working together and IPs of this machines change eventually. When we use a Business Services like google we reference a computer that we don't know the phisical implementation. 
    b) Technical system is a phisical machine, it have a IP. Can be a BBDD, ERP, J2EE ......... a Business System is a logical term that we use into the Business Scenarios and represent these Technical System that we had created.
    Hope it's help you
    Best Regards
    Iván Prieto

Maybe you are looking for

  • RRMX doesn't start a BEx, I would like to have BEx (3.5)

    Hi all, in our company, the roll out of SAP GUI 7.2 with 3.5 Add-On has started (but different patch levels; some have patch level 5, others became patch level 6). The upgraded GUIs had been SAP GUI 6.4 and 7.1. Our BI System is an SAP NetWeaver BW 7

  • SonicMQ Creation of Acceptor,Container Member Using API's

    In SonicMQ5.0.2 How to create Acceptor for Broker? and How to Add a new Broker Member to a Container? If any one can tell me ... i Shall be thankful regards

  • J2EE engine hangs on status Starting Apps

    Hi All We are currently experiencing issues with our J2EE engine.  When we start it, it goes up to the status Starting Apps and never leaves that status.  There are no errors on any of the logs/traces under work directory or the server0/log directory

  • From Premiere Pro in Windows to FCP X

    Hi I run Premiere Pro CC on a winows PC and want to export some clips to FCP X on my imac. The clips are 1920 x 1080. Which codec / format would you guys recommend? Thanks. Ulf

  • I am having trouble downloading new update via my computer,  PLEASE HELP!!!

    I have tried downloading the new upgrade (ios6) via my computer(iphone plugged in) but it seems to take so long to do this.  is there an easier/quicker way?  I tried again this morning and it got half way through and it said my connection timed out y