One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

Trying to install anything with pacaur or using makepkg gives out this error:
==> Making package: cower 12-2 (Wed Jan 7 07:11:25 WET 2015)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Downloading cower-12.tar.gz...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
100 22636 100 22636 0 0 60301 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 60362
-> Downloading cower-12.tar.gz.sig...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
100 287 100 287 0 0 1136 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 1134
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
cower-12.tar.gz ... Passed
cower-12.tar.gz.sig ... Skipped
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
cower-12.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 1EB2638FF56C0C53)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
Can someone help?

clfarron4 wrote:
Potomac wrote:
jasonwryan wrote:Like everything else, this can be automated with a couple of lines in your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf file, as described in the wiki.
I don't find this part in the wiki, can you tell me exactly where have you read this ?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Gnupg
I saw automatic importing of missing keys in this BBS thread. Don't know if it is in the ArchWiki though.
Just found it here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ma … e_checking
It is a personal preference, I don't want to import Arch/AUR keys into my normal personal keyring - but reading the gpg (and makepkg) manpage it looks like if you set GNUPGHOME=/some/path first that should work to set a special keyring just for AUR and a custom config from the wiki.

Similar Messages

PGP signatures could not be verified

I'm still somewhat new on using makepkg. I previously customized the bind pkg for samba by copying the /var/abs/extra/bind directory into my /var/abs/local and adding a couple of build options. Worked like a charm and no issues.
Today bind 9.10.2 was released and I wanted to update my package but I get:
ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified! when updating using the latest abs bind package.
==> Making package: bind 9.10.2-1 (Wed Mar 4 16:47:20 PST 2015)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Downloading bind-9.10.2.tar.gz...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 8282k 100 8282k 0 0 5669k 0 0:00:01 0:00:01 --:--:-- 5672k
-> Downloading bind-9.10.2.tar.gz.asc...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 490 100 490 0 0 6640 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 6712
-> Found tmpfiles.conf
-> Found sysusers.conf
-> Found named.conf
-> Found named.service
-> Found localhost.zone
-> Found localhost.ip6.zone
-> Found 127.0.0.zone
-> Found empty.zone
==> Validating source files with sha1sums...
bind-9.10.2.tar.gz ... Passed
bind-9.10.2.tar.gz.asc ... Skipped
tmpfiles.conf ... Passed
sysusers.conf ... Passed
named.conf ... Passed
named.service ... Passed
localhost.zone ... Passed
localhost.ip6.zone ... Passed
127.0.0.zone ... Passed
empty.zone ... Passed
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
bind-9.10.2.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
this is the abs bind package....why is it failing?

Same error here.
==> Validando arquivos fonte com sha256sums...
firefox-36.0.1.source.tar.bz2 ... Passou
firefox-36.0.1.source.tar.bz2.asc ... Ignorada
mozconfig ... Passou
firefox.desktop ... Passou
firefox-install-dir.patch ... Passou
vendor.js ... Passou
rhbz-966424.patch ... Passou
firefox-fixed-loading-icon.png ... Passou
==> Verificando assinatura de arquivo fonte com gpg...
firefox-36.0.1.source.tar.bz2 ... FALHOU (chave pública desconhecida 057CC3EB15A0A4BC)
==> ERRO: Uma ou mais assinaturas PGP não puderam ser verificadas!
I have checked (http://allanmcrae.com/2015/01/two-pgp-k … rch-linux/) but to no avail.
I do not understand why complicate things when they are working perfectly how it worked before...

[SOLVED] PGP signature could not be verified!

I am trying to install password safe from the AUR.
I have downloaded and un-tarred the tar.gz file but when I execute makepkg -s I get the following error:
$ makepkg -s
==> Making package: passwordsafe 0.94.1BETA-1 (Mon Dec 29 21:41:00 PST 2014)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found pwsafe-0.94.1BETA-src.tgz
-> Found pwsafe-0.94.1BETA-src.tgz.sig
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
pwsafe-0.94.1BETA-src.tgz ... Passed
pwsafe-0.94.1BETA-src.tgz.sig ... Passed
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
pwsafe-0.94.1BETA-src.tgz ... FAILED (unknown public key 919464515CCF8BB3)
Following the instructions on the "Package Signing" wiki, I:
$ sudo pacman -S haveged
$ sudo systemctl start haveged.service
$ sudo pacman-key --init
$ sudo pacman-key --populate archlinux
$ sudo pacman-key --add pwsafe-0.94.1BETA-src.tgz.sig
[sudo] password for xxxxx:
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2016-01-22
makepkg -s still fails at this point.
The next steps on the wiki call for:
1. verifying the fingerprint with: $ pacman-key -f keyid, and
2. locally signing the imported key with: # pacman-key --lsign-key keyid
How do I determine the "keyid"?
If I use the 'public key' returned in the error message above, I get:
$ pacman-key -f 919464515CCF8BB3
gpg: Note: trustdb not writable
gpg: error reading key: No public key
==> ERROR: The fingerprint of a specified key could not be determined.
And if I use the name of the file I downloaded with the tar, I get:
$ pacman-key -f pwsafe-0.94.1BETA-src.tgz.sig
gpg: Note: trustdb not writable
gpg: error reading key: No public key
==> ERROR: The fingerprint of a specified key could not be determined.
I even tried un-tarring the signature... but that didn't work either.
$ tar xzvf pwsafe-0.94.1BETA-src.tgz.sig
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
I also searched through pacman's keyring directly with:
$ gpg --homedir /etc/pacman.d/gnupg --list-keys
but I didn't see the packager's name or email address anywhere.
A nudge in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Last edited by sirdle (2014-12-31 01:05:32)

Thank you to everyone who replied!
It has taken me a while to read all the links and try to understand them.
My main problem was that I was mixing up package signing (via pacman) with package signing (via makepkg). The two are related, but separate: they both use gpg, they both use keys that can be downloaded from key servers, they both use keys that can be locally signed, they both use key-rings... but the key-rings they use are different, and process they use to install and validate those keys is also different. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
From the Wiki
The signature checking implemented in makepkg does not use pacman's keyring.
In my case, I'm installing from the AUR. The error I received:
FAILED (unknown public key 919464515CCF8BB3)
was because makepkg could not find the supplied key in my personal key-ring.
All I needed to do was:
1. Download the key.
2. Add it to my personal key ring.
3. Trust it.
Alternatively, I could build the package by skipping the check.
Download the Key
1. Download from the MIT key server. Enter the keyid as a 16-digit hex number, e.g., 0x919464515ccf8bb3. Right-click on the result and save to the desktop [see Roken's post] above. Or,
2. Try the command line per jasonwryan's post above. (This number does not need to start with 0x.)
I tried both of these methods to verify that they work. They do.
Add the key to my personal keyring
With jasonwryan's method, the key is added as part of the command. With Roken's method an additional command is needed:
gpg --import /path/to/saved/keyfile
If I try makepkg -s at this point I still get an error... but the error is different. It is now:
FAILED (the public key A703C1328EABC7B201753BA3919464515CCF8BB3 is not trusted)
which brings us to the third step.
Trust It
$ gpg --list-keys # to get the correct keyid
$ gpg -edit-key keyid # from the previous command
gpg> trust
At this point, gpg asks the user how much he trusts this key. If you're like stevenhoneyman you might say, "Er... not very much" and opt for building without trust.
Or you can grant a lot of trust in order to create the package and then revoke the trust later (but I'm guessing this will cause problems when the package needs to be updated).
A level of 5 "Ultimate Trust" was required to build this package.
Thanks to everybody who helped me out with this. Definitely a learning experience!
Last edited by sirdle (2014-12-31 01:21:53)

One or more activex controls could not be displayed because either

Hi.
I don't know if this is the right forum for my problem.
Anyway,
I have a problem with my Windows Services.
Each time when I launch Windows Services window, I get a warning:
One or more activex controls could not be displayed because either:
1. your current security settings prohibit running activex
controls on this page, or
2. you have blocked a publisher of one of the controls.
as a result, the page may not display correctly.
The warning pop-up opens only when I click on Extended tab.
The problem has nothing to do with IE security, because I can open pages with ActiveX controls on them and so.
I have installed Spybot spyware/malware removal tool. Then uninstalled it.
I'm not sure if this is the cause of the problem. But I presume it is.
So, may be someone was facing the same problem and knows the cause for it.
Thanks.

Unlike the rubbish that was stated before this post, this one works. This is the solution and Jishnu is brilliant. Thanks a million, friend.
Try to follow the KB article (KB907343).
1.
Click Start, click Run, type regedit, and then click OK.
2.
Expand the following registry subkey:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\Zones\0
3.
In the right pane, right-click 1200, and then click Modify.
4.
In the Value data box, type either 1 or 0 to overwrite the existing value of 3. Then, click OK.
Note If you type 1 in the Value data box, you will receive the following prompt when you start Microsoft Project:
Do you want to allow software such as ActiveX controls and plug-ins to run?Additionally, you will receive this prompt at other times when you use Microsoft
Project. If you do not want to receive this prompt, type 0 in the Value data box.
The values 0, 1, and 3 are associated with the following behavior:
0 = Enabled, or the action is permitted
1 = Prompt
3 = Disabled, or the action is not permitted
5.
Quit Registry Editor.
IF this does not works try to check the Internet Options..
Try to reset the Internet Explorer.
1. Click on
Start & run.
2. Type inetcpl.cpl & click
ok
3. Click on Advance Tab & click on
Reset (Make sure to put the check mark on the delete the personal setting for IE8) then again
reset.
4. Click
close.
This should work.

One or more ActiveX controls could not be displayed because either:1 your current security settings prohibit running ActiveX controls on this page, or 2. You have blocked a publisher of one of the controls.

hi All,
i have one of the requirement for an application, we do upload some release not in file server and that is used in application link to see the note. in this note i have converted the Excel into .HTM format(web page). this was working fine, but from last
two days all of a sudden we are recieving error as above.
one or more ActiveX controls could not be displayed because either:1 your current security settings prohibit running ActiveX controls on this page, or 2. You have blocked a publisher of one of the controls.
could anyone please help me on this.
Thanks and Regards,
krishnamurthy

Hi,
Actually Arnavsharma provided a operable method for you. But no luck, it's not invalid.
Here I also offer you an method you can try.Please delete the extra (parasite) zone from the Zones subkey :
Click Start , click Run , type regedit , and then click OK
Expand the following registry subkey
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\Zones
Delete the extra (parasite) zone from the Zones subkey
Note: The parasite zone is a pseudo-graphic number listed before zone number 0. The pseudo-graphic number looks like a miniature upper case "L"
Close the registry editor
Thanks!
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

One or more accounts provided could not be validated

I am trying to install the second node in the same management group of scom 2012. but I keep running into the error
one or more accounts provided could not be validated.
the account is the system center data access service account
any ideas ? The account is not locked out.

Check that this account has sufficient rights on the maangement server. local admin could be nice. Also try to startup a program such as notepas or whatever using the Run as DIfferent User option and type the credentials. Dont forget to place the domain
name as well as domain\sdkaccount (and do not copy/paste into those fields! Manually type everything in that wizard.
Bob Cornelissen - BICTT (My Blog about SCOM) - MVP 2012 + 2013 and Microsoft Community Contributor 2011 + 2012 Recipient

Itunes update aborts - error "signature could not be verified"

I have attempted several times to download and install the latest iTunes update (11.2). The install keeps aborting with the error message "itunes signature could not be verified." I tried downloading only, and still get a similar error message. Please don't ask me for the error message number - I didn't record it.
I am running iTunes on Windows 8. I've been able to install previous updates since migrating to a Windows 8 machine. Is this a known issue? If so, how do I solve it?

I notice this has happened with previous versions of iTunes as well as previous versions of Windows. I don't see any posts as yet about 11.2. Am attempting to download via the Apple website as suggested in replies to previous instances of this error. I will let you all know the result. I'd really like to know WHY this happens! Is it related to iTunes or Windows? If someone could explain in reasonable layperson's terms, that would be helpful. This is obviously a known issue for quite some time (posts going back to 2010-2011); why hasn't it been addressed? We should be able to download iTunes updates from within iTunes!
Thanks!

One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.

Hi Team,
I have created Administrator -approved Infopath form template to my site and activated same template in CA.
I have used this template in one of my Form library and i can able to submit the Form with success to the library.
when i click "View Item" or "Edit Item" of the form it throws , "One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields." error message.
I have refered my log files also but there is no useful information in that, please find my logs for your reference.
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x3790
SharePoint Foundation
Logging Correlation Data
xmnv
Medium
Site=/sites/Prototypes
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x3790
SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring
b4ly
High
Leaving Monitored Scope (PostResolveRequestCacheHandler). Execution Time=8.51588679566816
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x3790
SharePoint Foundation
General
8kh7
High
One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x3790
SharePoint Foundation
General
8sl1
High
DelegateControl: Exception thrown while adding control 'ASP._controltemplates_publishingconsole_ascx': One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x3790
SharePoint Foundation
General
8kh7
High
One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x3790
SharePoint Foundation
Runtime
tkau
Unexpected
System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetListItemDataWithCallback2(IListItemSqlClient pSqlClient, String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, String bstrViewName, String bstrViewXml, SAFEARRAYFLAGS fSafeArrayFlags, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pSACallback,
ISPDataCallback pPagingCallback, ISPDataCallback pPagingPrevCallback, ISPDataCallback pFilterLinkCallback, ISPDataCallback pSchemaCallback, ISPDataCallback pRowCountCallback, Boolean& pbMaximalView)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetListItemDataWithCallback2(IListItemSqlClient pSqlClient, String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, String bstrViewName, String bstrViewXml, SAFEA...
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x3790
SharePoint Foundation
Runtime
tkau
Unexpected
...RRAYFLAGS fSafeArrayFlags, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pSACallback, ISPDataCallback pPagingCallback, ISPDataCallback pPagingPrevCallback, ISPDataCallback pFilterLinkCallback, ISPDataCallback pSchemaCallback, ISPDataCallback pRowCountCallback, Boolean& pbMaximalView)
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x3790
SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring
b4ly
Medium
Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://test-sharepoint:80/sites/Prototypes/TRT/TRTLibrary/Forms/EditForm.aspx?ID=47&Source=http%3A%2F%2Ftest%2Dsharepoint%2Fsites%2FPrototypes%2FTRT%2FTRTLibrary%2FForms%2FAllItems%2Easpx&RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FPrototypes%2FTRT%2FTRTLibrary&ContentTypeId=0x01010100E7EE25E5A6898C4587A6B52C808EF03300FD54861D587A7E43BA3E2E6D392A3526&IsDlg=1)).
Execution Time=32.443369199158
w3wp.exe (0x08E4)
0x2C58
Access Services
Data Layer
8jg2
Medium
ResourceManager.PerformCleanup: Disk Manager: CurrentSize=0.
w3wp.exe (0x08E4)
0x2C58
Access Services
Data Layer
5pbr
Medium
ResourceManager.EvictUnusedItems: Disk Manager: Going to evict unused items. CurrentSize: 0.
w3wp.exe (0x08E4)
0x2C58
Access Services
Data Layer
5pbs
Medium
ResourceManager.EvictUnusedItems: Disk Manager: After unused items eviction. CurrentSize: 0
Diff:0.
w3wp.exe (0x2D7C)
0x0774
SharePoint Foundation
Topology
e5mc
Medium
WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress: 'http://test-sharepoint:32843/4ac2daef5ffe4850be08bd7bbebb5ac2/MetadataWebService.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.Taxonomy.IMetadataWebServiceApplication' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/taxonomy/soap/IDataAccessReadOnly/GetChanges'
MessageId: 'urn:uuid:dcba94c3-2764-428c-b44f-60e703328ceb'
w3wp.exe (0x08E4)
0x2E24
SharePoint Foundation
Topology
e5mb
Medium
WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress: 'http://test-sharepoint.anca.com.au:32843/4ac2daef5ffe4850be08bd7bbebb5ac2/MetadataWebService.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/taxonomy/soap/IDataAccessReadOnly/GetChanges'
MessageId: 'urn:uuid:dcba94c3-2764-428c-b44f-60e703328ceb'
Jeeva

Hello,
Is there any other content type on library or check if there is any duplicate column? Could you please also show us your library columns detail? (pic is also fine of lib settings page)
If you have any ""Property Promotion" column then SP create those columns as site column and associate them with this template so check "Allow management of content types" for that form library as well.
Hemendra:Yesterday is just a memory,Tomorrow we may never see
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help

"One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields" while accessing website pages

We have a publishing website in SharePoint 2010. There are total 4 environments - Development, Test, Stage and Production. For some enhancements, we had to create some new lists and libraries. When we moved changes from Development to Test environment, everything
worked fine. Relevant lists and libraries in lower environments were saved as templates (in .stp format) including content, imported to higher environment, lists/libraries were created in higher environment using imported templates.
Things worked fine from Development to Test. We did similar exercise from Test to Stage environment. Now in Stage, when we access some pages, we get error message - "One or more field types are not installed
properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.". ULS logs don't tell which exact list has got problems.
On searching for this error, I got many articles that explain how this could happen when we migrate from SharePoint 2007 (MOSS) to 2010. Though our case different (as all our environments are in 2010), we still tried following steps.
De-activate 'SharePoint Server Publishing Infrastructure' Site Collection feature
Go to https://site-name/relationships%20list/allitems.aspx. This is a hidden list. Delete this list.
Re-activate 'SharePoint Server Publishing Infrastructure' Site Collection feature.
Make sure that new hidden list with one item is created at https://site-name/relationships%20list/allitems.aspx
However, this didn't help as we are still getting same error message. Appreciate if someone can suggest how this issue can be resolved.
Following are ULS logs:
Unable to execute query: Error 0x81020014
One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.
System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetListItemDataWithCallback2(IListItemSqlClient pSqlClient, String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, String bstrViewName, String bstrViewXml, SAFEARRAYFLAGS fSafeArrayFlags, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pSACallback,
ISPDataCallback pPagingCallback, ISPDataCallback pPagingPrevCallback, ISPDataCallback pFilterLinkCallback, ISPDataCallback pSchemaCallback, ISPDataCallback pRowCountCallback, Boolean& pbMaximalView)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetListItemDataWithCallback2(IListItemSqlClient pSqlClient, String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, String bstrViewName, String bstrViewXml, SAFEARRAYFLAGS fSafeArrayFlags, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pSACallback, ISPDataCallback
pPagingCallback, ISPDataCallback pPagingPrevCallback, ISPDataCallback pFilterLinkCallback, ISPDataCallback pSchemaCallback, ISPDataCallback pRowCountCallback, Boolean& pbMaximalView)
Thanks!

Hi Shrishail ,
Some time this issue occurs if you have any custom filed types in the list or library and that field type is not installed on server .
Can you please check that if you are having any custom field types column on the list and library and if that is the case you need to install that field type on the server. sometimes it happens if field types are not properly deployed / Installed then
you have to uninstall that field types (retract solution) and deploy it again.
Thanks,
Ujjwal

INS-40925 - One or more nodes have interfaces not configured with a subnet that is common across all cluster nodes.

Hi All,
I am facing the below error while installing Oracle RAC in Silent Mode.
SEVERE: There are no common subnets represented by network interfaces across all cluster nodes.
SEVERE: [FATAL] [INS-40925] One or more nodes have interfaces not configured with a subnet that is common across all cluster nodes.
   CAUSE: Not all nodes have network interfaces that are configured on subnets that are common to all nodes in the cluster.
   ACTION: Ensure all cluster nodes have a public interface defined with the same subnet accessible by all nodes in the cluster.
My /etc/hosts is given below.
127.0.0.1        localhost    localhost.localdomain
#Public
192.168.1.101      rac1        rac1.localdomain
192.168.1.102    rac2        rac2.localdomain
#Private
192.168.2.101    rac1-priv    rac1-priv.localdomain
192.168.2.102    rac2-priv    rac2-priv.localdomain
#Virtual
192.168.1.103      rac1-vip    rac1-vip.localdomain
192.168.1.104    rac2-vip    rac2-vip.localdomain
#SCAN
192.168.1.105    rac-scan    rac-scan.localdomain
Could you please help me to get rid of the error INS-40925....Any Idea...???

Hi Ramesh,
Please find the result of ifconfig -a from both nodes RAC1 & RAC2.
ifconfig -a in RAC1
[oracle@rac1 Desktop]$ ifconfig -a
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:17:7A:D5
          inet addr:192.168.1.101 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe17:7ad5/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:102 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:25472 (24.8 KiB) TX bytes:3322 (3.2 KiB)
          Interrupt:19 Base address:0xd020
eth1      Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:C0:AC:DB
          inet addr:192.168.2.101 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fec0:acdb/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:240 (240.0 b) TX bytes:816 (816.0 b)
          Interrupt:16 Base address:0xd240
lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
          RX packets:56 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:56 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:6394 (6.2 KiB) TX bytes:6394 (6.2 KiB)
virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:CC:BD:FB
          inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
virbr0-nic Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:CC:BD:FB
          BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
ifconfig -a in RAC2
[oracle@rac2 Desktop]$ ifconfig -a
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:C9:38:82
          inet addr:192.168.1.102 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fec9:3882/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:122 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:59 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:32617 (31.8 KiB) TX bytes:5157 (5.0 KiB)
          Interrupt:19 Base address:0xd020
eth1      Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:90:B5:A0
          inet addr:192.168.2.102 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe90:b5a0/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:240 (240.0 b) TX bytes:746 (746.0 b)
          Interrupt:16 Base address:0xd240
lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
          RX packets:56 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:56 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:6390 (6.2 KiB) TX bytes:6390 (6.2 KiB)
virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:CC:BD:FB
          inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
virbr0-nic Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:CC:BD:FB
          BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

Error in MR11: One or more purchase orders were not updated

Dear Gurus,
While posting MR11 for a account assigned purchase order i'm facing a error as "One or more purchase orders were not updated" under message ID CKMLGRIR 003.
Diagnosis: An error occurred during the update. As a result, an entire processing package of purchase orders could not be cleared.
I checked with the PO and it looks correct.
What may cause this issue? I'm using 4.6C release.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
RathiM

Please check the SAP note below :
843022 MR11: Error log, purchase order number is missing

I'm trying to order album and I'm getting this message:Your book seems to have frames on one or more pages that do not contain photos. You must either change the layout of those pages or place photos in those frames before you can proceed with this book.

I'm trying to order an album and I'm getting this message:
Your book seems to have frames on one or more pages that do not contain photos. You must either change the layout of those pages or place photos in those frames before you can proceed with this book.
As far as I can see I have placed pictures on all the pages. I admit that on some pages I could have placed 3 or 4 pictures but I chose to use ony one or two. Could that be the problem?

Yes -
Your book seems to have frames on one or more pages that do not contain photos. You must either change the layout of those pages or place photos in those frames before you can proceed with this book.
The error seems pretty clear - you must have a photo in evey photo frame in order to place your order - so you must either change the layout (if you only want one photo on a page then use a layout with one photo) or put photos in the spots you have not filled
LN

"One or more field types are not installed properly" when I try to add a second discussion board web part to a page

I have a SharePoint 2010 site with two discussion boards. I added one additional field to each of the boards: a lookup to another list to link the discussions to individual projects. I need 2 different boards because they have different posting permissions
(one is open to all for comments, and one is open only to the project team to post but everyone can read).
When I go to the pages for each of the discussion boards, they work fine.
But I'm putting together a page for individual projects, and want to have web parts for both discussion boards on the same page, showing the discussions related to the selected project.
I am able to add one of the discussion boards to a web part in the page, but when I add the second discussion board to the page, the new web part contains:
One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.
Correlation ID: blah blah blah
I've searched for similar postings, but mostly I see this error message related to migration from 2007 to 2010 -- this is not the case here: I created both discussion boards, and the whole site, in SP 2010. I've also found this message related
to coding errors using SPQuery. I am not doing any coding here, just using the built-in SharePoint 2010 Edit Page -> add a web part -> select the discussion list. I tried doing it from SPD with the same result.

I figured it out. I was using ?FilterField1=fieldname&FilterValue1=value on the URL to the page to pick out one project number. The web part I was trying to add was for a list that did not have that particular fieldname. I didn't realize that would matter
since I was using the Connections -> Get Filter Values From to get my filter values from the main web part, which does have that fieldname.
I added a field with that fieldname to the other list and set a workflow to copy the lookup value of the project number lookup field into the new field. Now all is working fine. Sorry for the wild geese in my original question.

One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields. nativehr 0x81020014 /nativehr nativestack /nativestack

Hi ,
I am working in sharepoint 2013, This is a custom timer timer Execute method where i am moving a document item from one library to other once its expired,it was running fine and suddenly giving following error:-
One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.<nativehr>0x81020014</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>
StackTrace = " at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx)\r\n at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetListItemDataWithCallback2(IListItemSqlClient pSqlClient, String bstrUrl, String bstrListName,
String bstrViewName, String bstrView...
I have filled all the meta data(site column) for the item but still same error, Please help me out as i have no clue why it is giving this error
public override void Execute(Guid targetInstanceId)
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
using (SPSite site = new SPSite(sourceUrl))
using (SPWeb web = site.OpenWeb())
//gets the document lib
SPList listFrom = web.Lists[sourceList];
//gets the expired documents items
SPQuery query = new SPQuery();
query.ViewFields = "<FieldRef Name='Expiration_x0020_Date'/>";
query.Query = @"<Where><Leq><FieldRef Name='Expiration_x0020_Date'/><Value Type='DateTime' ><Today /></Value></Leq></Where>";
SPListItemCollection items = listFrom.GetItems(query);
//if expired items found
if (items.Count > 0)
SPFile oFile = null;
foreach (SPListItem item in items)
string strfile = item.File.Name;
oFile = web.GetFile(sourceList + "/" + strfile);
//oFile.CopyTo("Archive/" + strfile);
oFile.MoveTo(destinationList + "/" + strfile);

Hi,
I think the issue is related to the internal name of the Expiration Day.
In the caml query code lines, we should use the right internal field name to retrieve and filter the list items.
To avoid such mistake, we can use the CAML Designer tool to generate the caml query code.
We can download the tool here: http://www.camldesigner.com/?p=594
Thanks & Regards,
Jason
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

I have a new hard drive as my old one crashed. Everything seemed to transfer fine except for my entire iTunes library. It shows all of my old songs, but when I click on one it states "the song could not be used as the original file could not be found

I have a new hard drive as my old one crashed. Everything seemed to transfer fine except for my entire iTunes library. It shows all of my old songs, but when I click on one it states "the song could not be used as the original file could not be found.would you like to locate it".
Either how do I locate it, and I've tried every trick I know, or how do I restore all of my songs from one of two sources. I have my old hard drive backedup on an external drive which should have all of my songs, and I have most of my songs on my old iPhone 3S which I'm using as a backup iPod.

The "missing file" error happens if the file is no longer where iTunes expects to find it. Possible causes are that you or some third party tool has moved, renamed or deleted the file, one of its parent folders, or the drive it lives on has had a change of drive letter. It is also possible that iTunes has changed from expecting the files to be in the pre-iTunes 9 layout to post-iTunes 9 layout, or vice-versa, and so is looking in slightly the wrong place. In the case of a library moved from one system to another there are also potential permissions issues. See Repair security permissions for iTunes for Windows.
Select a track with an exclamation mark, use Ctrl-I to Get Info, then click No when asked to try to locate the track. (Due to a bug in iTunes 12 you currently have to say No twice!) Look on the summary tab for the location that iTunes thinks the file should be. Now take a look around your hard drive(s). Hopefully you can locate the track in question. If a section of your library has simply been moved, a folder renamed, or a drive letter has changed, it should be possible to reverse the actions. If the difference between the two paths is an additional Music folder in one path then this is a layout issue. I can explain further if that is the case.
In some cases iTunes may be able to repair itself if you go through the same steps with Get Info but this time click Locate and browse to the lost track. It may then offer to attempt to automatically fix other broken links.
If another application like Windows Media Player has moved/renamed the files then the chances are that subtle differences in naming strategies will make it hard to restore the media to the precise path that iTunes is expecting. In such cases, as long as the missing files can be found somewhere, you should be able to use my FindTracks script to reconnect them to iTunes. See this post for an explanation of how it works.
See also Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device.
tt2

One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for