One sender - two receivers - same Message-ID?

Hi,
I don´t know if it is possible to send a message (which is, as you know identified by its Message-ID) to two receivers where at least one receiver has to keep the Message-ID of the xi-incoming message. This is necessary because it has to be used as part of the receiver-filename.
We work with triggerfiles, which identify in which sequence the Messages have to be processed at the receiver system. If you use more than one interface determination, for each receiver an new Message-ID is generated. This is what I want to prevent.
Does anyone know if this is possible using a business process. (XI3.0 SP17)
If yes, what is it to look like? I´m thinking about one receiver and two senders (in bp-design) :).
Regards,
Thomas

Hi VJ,
I think your doubts are reasonable, as this doesn´t fit the "Exactly once"-idea of messages. As soon as the bpe picks up the Message, you got no chance to save the original Message-ID. I just designed a little process to give it a try, but it didn´t work (i. e. the two new Message-IDs appeared for the BP-outgoing messages).
Why I want to use it? This would be an addon for a more or less complex Szenario, which we cannot change without a redesign of the hole szenario ...
I think we´ll have to let the application server generate the Message twice with different receiver agreements. Sounds ugly.
Thank you for confirmation.
Best regards
Thomas
Best regards
Thomas

Similar Messages

Everytime I send my husband a text or he sends me one, we get the same message instantly as a reply

everytime I send my husband a text or he sends me one, we get the same message as a reply. or if I try to send a picture to my email it sends it back to my phone. how do I fix this?

Go into settings-facetime-iphone cellular calls
Turn it off (grey)
On both devices.
Good Luck

One sender two recievers

hi friends,
i have a object .i want to send 100 recordes.i heve one sender ,two recievers. i send 100 recordes two two recievers.first 50 are to first sender and remain are to second records.i dont know how to design and how to configure pls help on this with simple example.
advance thanks

Hi,
try this if it is possible,
Give numbering to records from 1 to 100.Add one key filed like 'recordno' in your source stucture and get the record number into 'recordno' field in source structure.
you can identify the record number using context object.
in context object u can specify the condition like recordno<50 or recordno>50.
if recordno<50 --> rec1
if recordno>50 --> rec2
u can assign above two conditions in reciever determination.
for context object refer below links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d6/e44fcf98baa24a9686a7643a33f26f/content.htm
for 1:n mapping refer below link,
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

IDOC -XI-SOAP one sender different receivers based on condition

Hi All,
I have an IDOC to SOAP scenario.
For each record based on the input flag XI has to send the any one of the request ...like either create or update or delete request. All these message types are a part of single WSDL.
How can i do it?
Thanks in Advance
Jyothsna

hi There are two ways you can do this:
1. Without BPM - Since you have to create all the target messages adn you want either the 1st and second, or the first and third: create two multi-mapping with one and two, and one and three. In the receiver determination check the condtion based on which you decide the second or the third message has to be created and route it to the correct mapping accordingly.
2. with BPM, create all the target mapping. In the BPM check the condtion in the switch and do a send accordingly.
You can do this either on Receievr Determination or on Interface Determination.
Add multiple Receievrs/ Interfaces and then add the conditons on which the target should be choosen
to use Xpath for your receiver det. ref these blogs;
a combination of logics should help you in this case ...
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
pls reward points if solution found helpfull
regards
chandra.k

[SOLVED] Broken script sends me the same message every ten seconds

I accidentally did something really, really stupid earlier.
After modifying a script, I kept a "while/do" loop intact in such a manner similar to this:
while [ i==0 ]; do
echo "message" | mail [email protected]
done
As you can see, this sent the same message god-knows-how-many-times in the minute or two it took me to figure out the issue. So, my mailbox is being flooded with this same message. Removing heirloom-mailx didn't yield any positive results.
Is there any way I can prevent it from sending any more copies produced by this loop, or do I just have to put up with it until it produces its very last message from that? In the two minutes it took to type this message, I've already received eight more copies, and more are on the way.
Last edited by apolyonn (2014-03-20 01:37:08)

karol wrote:
I recall a somewhat similar situation when one guy texted another guy during a lecture.
He did send the message, but the other guy's phone didn't seem to get it. It was silent. So he send it again. And again. To make it even "better", it was a two-part message ...
For a while nothing happened and then the other guy's phone starter receiving all these messages. He had a loud, high-pitched ringtone on his phone. And he had his phone ... somewhere. Was it in his backpack? Was it in his bag? In his jacket?
Chaos ensued.
So you can see it could have been worse :-)
Haha, fair enough I was reminded of the "Look Around You" opening sequence.
10 PRINT LOOK AROUND YOU
20 GOTO 10
30 RUN
Set-up a gmail filter to delete them as they come in; that should hold me over for the time being.
Solved.
Last edited by apolyonn (2014-03-20 00:38:06)

One Producer - Many Consumers - Same Message

I hope this hasn't been asked before, but every time I search I never find help for my specific problem.
I have a program that does the following. Has one incoming TCP connection. Has many outgoing TCP connections. Each connection is in a separate thread. When I receieve a new string from the incoming I want to send it to all outgoing connections.
Currently I am using a Variable that gets overwritten w/ each new incoming message. I am afraid that it will get overwritten before it is sent on all outgoing connections. So I want to use a queue. However, and this is what I see in examples all over the web, once the outgoing pops from the queue, the other ones don't have that message anymore. So how do I pop it off once all consumer threads send the message off?

Just create a separate incoming queues for each thread and allow the consumer to remove the messages.

Two iphones: which one sends the SMS in Messages?

I have two iphones with different phone numbers, both logged into the same AppleID. Messages works fine and all messages are synced across all devices.
Question:
When I originate a new SMS (not iMessage) from the Mac app Messages, is there any kind of control which device actually sends it respectively which one will be used?
Dominik

HI,
I see.
The same settings as the iMessages one then (I presume there is not a separate SMS one ?)
This has always worked as you described for iMessages.
You can Set the device (iPhone number or Apple ID ) that the Mac Version should "Start Conversations From".
You can also set similar on the iPhones.
However as you say if an iMessages is sent to a specific iPhone Number that iPhone will return an iMessages using that Number (if you answer it on the Mac it will start the conversation as if it is that number) effectively ignoring the settings made.
Only brand new iMessages follow the Settings/Preferences.
8:05 pm Wednesday; March 4, 2015
 iMac 2.5Ghz i5 2011 (Mavericks 10.9)
 G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
 MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
 Mac OS X (10.6.8),
 Couple of iPhones and an iPad

One sender many receivers

hi friends
I am doing IDOC TO FILE SCENARIO. In XI the idoc will generate the xml file in the target system.
Is it possible to create the xml file at the specified system based on the condition.
suppose i have a field by name receiver in the idoc. and i have 5 receivers. if i put 2 in the receiver field then it will generate the xml file in the 2 receiver system and it will not generate in the other systems. this option is available in xi? if available how can i do that one..
can any one tell this..
one more thing....
in R/3 side i send the idoc to my xi. but in the tcode sm58 it shows the error message as
no service for SAPSID, CLIENT 100 IN THE INTEGRATION DIRECTORY.
how can i recitify that one. I created the Business system for R/3 as PRD. Instead of this if i create it with sapsid it will work?
any suggestions regarding these 2 problms please
Thanks in advance
Vasu

maybe XPATH can help you
Ref:
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
Here based on a field in your source you can route the message to a receiver.
Also ref: /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16 for enhanced recv. det.

One mac, two users, same Quicken - shared file does not work.

As stated I have two users, both administrators, on the one machine and I can not find a way to allow read/write access to the one quicken account. How do I set this up correctly. I do have an external firewire hard drive set up to allow access to photo and media files. If that is my only option to have permissions ignored, what part of Quicken files do I set up on the external? ?only the backup? Would a separate disc image on the internal HD do the same thing?
Thanks in advance.

You can't. Each datafile is associated with a specific user and thus its permissions dictate what can be done with it. IMHO, it's best to use two datafiles, one for each user. Non-Apple application peculiarities are best addressed at that app's forums. In this case, visit http://www.quickencommunity.com/ and post to the appropriate forum.

Smb resolution problem on one of two MBPs, same network

I have a MBP 2,2, 10.6.5 and a MBP 8,2, 10.6.7. Each connects to the local network via WiFi 802.11n. The router is a Netgear WNDR3700.
On the new MBP, I have connection problems when browsing to SMB shares in the Finder that are not named explicitly in /etc/hosts. All the shares I expect show up in the Finder. However, connections fail:
6/29/11 29 103715 /System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/MacOS/Finder[210] SharePointBrowser::handleOpenCallBack returned 65
On the old MBP there is no problem.
What's been tried so far: make /etc/smb.conf identical on the two machines; twiddle name resolve order when that didn't work; examine /var/db/smb.conf (which on the new machine includes three Kerberos lines that do not appear in the old machine's /var/db/smb.conf, I've commented these out even though the file header says DO NOT EDIT); throwing away /Library/Caches and ~Library/Caches; adding hosts' names explicitly to /etc/hosts. Firewall settings on the two machines are identical.
Connections always work to shares named explicitly in /etc/hosts. They always work between the two MBPs. The new MBP can basically connect to nothing that isn't named in /etc/hosts on any reboot except the one immediately following deletion of the caches. If the machine is connecting properly and then allowed to sleep, on waking it can no longer connect to the shares.
What should I look for to figure out this behavior? The MBP 2,2 has been exemplary and it seems reasonable that the 8,2 can do the same things.
Thanks.

Yoo Chung,
Went into preferences and deleted all cookies. Then with Safari downloaded and installed 'Firefox Browser' and ran to see if we could break into Yahoo mail. Unfortunately, that didn't help. One thing that I didn't take into account was that I had reset the 'Parental Controls' after installing and updating Leopard.
I decided to uncheck the Parental Controls, log into Yahoo from 'Firefox', and got to the mail account page without any difficulty. We backed out, tried the same on Safari and everything worked just fine. I let her get into her email account and clean up the multitude of junk that collected since installing Leopard. Then reset the Parental Controls and then went back to the Yahoo mail account without any glitches.
Apparently, something triggered a fault and would let her go beyond the Yahoo opening page to mail. Everything is running great now, and we've an additional browser just in case.
Thanks for you help.

HT1386 I can't synchronise phone 5s with mac book pro. mac message me : the i phone could not be synchronised because this computer is no longer authorised for purchased items that are on this i phone. then go and authorised mac but keep send me the same

I can't synchronise phone 5s with i tunes . mac message me : the i phone could not be synchronised because this computer is no longer authorised for purchased items that are on this i phone. then go and authorised mac but keep send me the same message.

Hi john,
Follow the troubleshooting steps in this article:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1389
Cheers,
GB

Send the same message to two receivers with some time difference..

Hi
I want to send the same message to Two receivers with the slight time difference.. becuase but not at the same time.. if the same time means.. just we can specify the two receivers in the one receiver determination..
but if i want to send the same message to Two reveivers with the time difference means..(after sending the message to first receiver.. after some time gap.. i need to send the message to second receiver..
this type of scenarios how can we do.. is it possible to do with out BPM... please suggest me the solution..
Thanks
Jain .P

Hi Jain,
With BPM you can easily do it.
i am giving you the steps:
1)first add a receive strep to get your message
2)then, put a receiver determination step with a multiline receiver container element assigned to its Receivers property.
3)then, put a block in dynamic mode(ie. ForEach/ParForEach mode) and assign the multiline receiver container element to its multiline element and assign a simple(single line) receiver container element to its current line property.
4) add a send step within the block, choose Receivers List in its Receiver From property and choose the current line receiver element in its Receivers property.
5) then add a wait step in the BPM, in its type select Wait Specified Time Period and then mention the duration in your desired time unit.
**Reward points if helpful...
--Sankar Choudhury

Send one message to two receivers simultanously

Hi,gurus:
I wanna know how can we send one message to two receivers simultanously.
Our scenario is file to file,and we add two receivers in receiver determinations,and leave the conditions empty.
But it seems the message was only sent to one receivers.
Any ideas?

Hi...
You should be able to send same file to two different receivers. For that you need to create :
1. Two communication channels for two receivers
2. Add two receivers in the Receiver Determination ( under Configure Receivers)
3. Two interface determination for two receivers
4. Two receiver Agreements having two different receiver CC.
5. Only one sender agreement.
If you have created all the above objects, you should be able to send a file to two receivers.
Thanks,
Pooja

Can we send the same message two different recievers with sequence

Hi,
i am sending the same message to two different receviers without using BPM.
now i require to send with sequence.is it possible without BPM?

Hey
There are two options for this
First one is to use Wait step in BPM as other experts suggested.
Second one is a dirty way around,what you can do is send the second message to a dummy receiver first(may be a file on your XI server),then design one bypass scenario which will pick up the file after a specified time interval(give the poling interval you want).
i would go for BPM coz its pretty straight forward,but in case you want to avoid BPM then u can use the second approach
for bypass scenario,have a look at the following
How to send any data (even binary) through XI, without using the Integration Repository

One Sender system and two receivers system scenario. Pls help

Hello,
I have One Sender system and two receivers system scenario.
My sender is RFC (sync) in nature.
My one receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
My second receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
Pls tell me and send me links/docs for this scenario.
Regards

Hi Rick,
For two receivers you require 2 interface determination, receivers determinations etc.
Go through these threads for one sender and multiple receivers:
one sender and two receiver
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
Then configure your RFC communication channel in XI system + activate it and after that using all same parameters make an TCP/IP RFC destinatioon on R3 side.
Rewrads if found helpful.
BR,
Alok

One sender - two receivers - same Message-ID?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for