One to one relationship in jpa

I have two relation table like , I would Like to try select by UID by JPA ,
select *from student as P, Address as A where P.UserId=A.UserId
and A.UpdateId=uid;
step one
I have my persistence.xml testing by single table
step two I have two entity class from DB
in my student{} @Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name = "UserId", nullable = false)
private Integer userId;.....
in my address I have
@JoinColumn(name = "UserId", referencedColumnName = "UserId", nullable = false)
@OneToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy="Student")
private Student student;
what else I need to do in order to let it work??

jsutherl wrote:
To do a join in JPA you can either use "join" or the "." notation for a OneToOne.
i.e.
Select s from Student s where s.address.updateId = :id
You would need a OneToOne from Student to Address for this.
@OneToOne(mappedBy="student")
private Address address;
James : http://www.eclipselink.org
I guest I get the part that you post , but if I want to display the information out of two tables, but in Servlet
Query query=em.createNamedQuery("?");
List stList=query.getResultList();
Iterator stIterator=stList.iterator();
while(stIterator.hasNext()){
*? which class?*=?.stIterator.next();} ??
Thank you!

Similar Messages

  • One to one relationship between records while entering in MDM data manager?

    Example Scenario::
         I have created <b>Employee details</b>(main table) and<b> Salary</b> (look up flat table for employee number filed in main table) .  Tried to get the corresponding employee's gross salary from <b>salary</b> table to <b>employee Details</b> table basing on <b>Employee number</b> field in Employee Details table as <b>Gross salary</b> and <b>Employee number</b> are common fields for both the tables. But i could not get one to one relationship in this case , Please explain how to achieve?

    Employee Details (Main Table)
                   EmpNo(Look up field)      EmpNa     GrossSal(Look up field)
    Salary Details  (Look Flat Table)
         Empno         Basic Sal        GrossSal   
          012              5000             10000
                     013              4000               8000
    I have created two tables with the above fields. In main table i kept two look up fields to Salary Details table. First i have entered data to salary table as above , now when i am trying to enter data in to main table EmpNo as 012 it should show Gross salary as 10000 automatically as per the corresponding EmpNo. Instead it is showing all the Grosssal values of Salary table.

  • If Company has one to one relationship with Company code

    Dear All,
    If Company has one to one relationship with company code in the transaction system (ECC),
    can we use company in place off company code - in the BCS system?
    That is, in this case - under consolidation units
    - company,
    i will be using the ECC companies rather than ECC company codes as consolidation units.
    Request your insights.
    Cheers
    Kumar

    Actually, I almost always use the company, not the company code. The difference is in the different number of attributes, and the type CHAR 4 or 6. 0COMPANY is the standard infoobject for using in SEM-BCS.
    Though, I also used the custom infoobject for ConsUnit. Not a problem. Everything works. Just one needs to be careful with infoobjects which are the references to the Company IO.

  • Can Legal Entity - Operating Unit have One to One Relationship in R12

    Hi,
    I want to configure one Legal Entity to one Operating Unit in R12 as it was in 11i. ie One to One Relationship, How can I achieve this ?
    Thanks in Advance,
    Thejas

    That is because you're not setting it, obviously. Nowhere in your code are you actually populating the order property of the orderlines.

  • Problem with cascade delete in CMP one-to-one relationship

    I am not able to cascade delete for one-to-one relationship. Even though relationship seems to be setup correctly, record from the second table is not deleted.
    Following is the structure of tables i am using:
    First Table(vcc_lrmc) -- LRMCBean
    lrmc_id pk (Bean field is id)
    lrmc_dtl_id (Bean field islrmcDtlId)
    Second Table (vcc_lrmc_dtl) -- LRMCDetailBean
    lrmc_dtl_id (pk) (Bean field islrmcDtlId)
    lrmc_id (Bean field id)
    One to one bidirectional relationship has been setup with CMR fields moreLRMC and mainLRMC.
    section of ejb-jar is as follows:
    <ejb-relation>
    <ejb-relation-name>LRMCMainToDetail</ejb-relation-name>
    <ejb-relationship-role>
    <multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
    <relationship-role-source>
    <ejb-name>LRMC</ejb-name>
    </relationship-role-source>
    <cmr-field>
    <cmr-field-name>moreLRMC</cmr-field-name>
    </cmr-field>
    </ejb-relationship-role>
    <ejb-relationship-role>
    <multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
    <cascade-delete/>
    <relationship-role-source>
    <ejb-name>LRMCDetail</ejb-name>
    </relationship-role-source>
    <cmr-field>
    <cmr-field-name>mainLRMC</cmr-field-name>
    </cmr-field>
    </ejb-relationship-role>
    </ejb-relation>
    section of orion-ejb-jar is as follows:(Bidirectional mapping)
    <entity-deployment name="LRMC" data-source="jdbc/VCCDS" table="VCC_LRMC">
    <cmp-field-mapping name="moreLRMC">
    <entity-ref home="LRMCDetail">
    <cmp-field-mapping name="lrmcDtlId" persistence-name="LRMC_DTL_ID"/>
    </entity-ref>
    </cmp-field-mapping>
    </entity-deployment>
    <entity-deployment name="LRMCDetail" data-source="jdbc/VCCDS" table="VCC_LRMC_DTL">
    <cmp-field-mapping name="mainLRMC">
    <entity-ref home="LRMC">
    <cmp-field-mapping name="id" persistence-name="LRMC_ID"/>
    </entity-ref>
    </cmp-field-mapping>
    </entity-deployment>
    Is there anything else need to be setup for Cascade delete or is there anything wrong the way one-to-one relationship has been setup.
    Pls. advice.
    Thanks
    Dhiraj

    Is it happening because of this bug.
    Cannot create a 1:1 bi-directional CMR for entity beans when database tables are reverse engineered. (2447364)
    Anyone, any idea on this ?
    Cheers,
    Dhiraj

  • One to one relationship modelling

    Hi all
    How to model a one to one relationship?
    i have a scenario where i had to maintain 2 different entities and cannot merge them into a single table coz they are separate entities
    Now while modelling them ... do we need to have a primary key for the second table (or)
    use the primary key of the first table as the foreign key on the second table with Unique constraint on it .
    Ex: a single subscription has a single criteria
    subscription table ........... and criteria table
    now should i iuse criteria id as a primary key of criteria table ? (or)
    subscription id as the foregin key in the criteria table ?
    or allow include both in the criteria table
    please suggest
    Thanks and Regards
    Raj

    hi dportas,
    first of all thanks for your respose...
    what is reciprocal foreign key?
    my scenario is like this
    i have a table called subscriptions which records all subscriptions that we have subscribed to to receive an alert to our email primary key is subscriptionid.
    every alert has an alert criteria with different set of attributes
    hence i have 5 alert criteria tables... each with totlally different type of attributes
    eg: balance criteria (balanceamount,condition) cutoff criteria(cutofftime,....)
    we can subscribe to only one alert in a single subscription
    hence subscription to balance criteria table is 1-1
    subscription to cutoff criteria table is 1-1
    now my question is that shoudl each of the criteria table should have criteriaid (or) should i put subscription id as the foregih key in each of the tables for relationship

  • How to generate lookup if there is one-to-one relationship?

    Hi,
    I am an new Jheadstart user and i am using Oracle Developer 10g with Jheadstart.
    There are two tables in my database with a one-to-one relationship between them.
    My database concept is that I need to have one table as a lookup of the other one. Jheadstart does not generate it that way because the relationship is not one-to-many, so I am not geting nor choice, nor lov.
    Could this possibly be solved?

    You probably get better answers in the JHeadstart forum.

  • How to query objects on variable one-to-one relationship

    Hi,
    I have a situation here:
    Application (APPLICATION table) has many payoffs (Payoff table); Primary key of application is the foreign key of payoff.
    Payoff has disbursement, such as check(check table), directDeposit(directDeposit table) or Wire(wire table), which is variable one-to-one relationship. They share the same primary key
    The query I need to run is to search application based on check number, How do I construct a query to perform this kind of search?
    Thanks
    Hao
    [email protected]

    Hi Doug,
    Thanks for all your help. But I guess I still need more details from you to help me understand the solution.
    First of all, I want to make sure I make my case clear
    Application (application table, pk: uniqueAppId) has many payoffs (Payoff table, pk: payoffId);
    Payoff object has variable one-to-one mapping to Disbursement object, which is a abstract super clss for following objects:
    Check(payoff-check table, pk: payoffId)
    DirectDeposit(payoff-deposit table, pk: payoffId)
    Wire(payoff-wire table, pk: payoffId),
    The query I want to run is to get me back an application for a particular check number
    From you email, first I thought "check" is a object, then your sample code showed it is a string. So I am kind of confused. The document you pointed seems not reflect my case. I wonder it is because I didn't present my case clear the first time.
    Looking forward to your further help
    Hao

  • Mapping one-to-one relationship

    Hi mates, i have two tables
    // Car Table CREATE TABLE CAR ( CAR_ID NUMBER(19,0) DEFAULT 1 NOT NULL, LAST_UPDATE TIMESTAMP DEFAULT SYSDATE, MAKE VARCHAR2(20), MODEL NUMBER(5,0), REGISTRATION VARCHAR2(25), MILEAGE NUMBER, ENGINE_SIZE NUMBER(1,1), TANK_SIZE NUMBER(2,0), GAS_IN_TANK NUMBER(2,0), CATEGORY_ID NUMBER(19,0) DEFAULT 1 NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (CAR_ID) ); // Contract CREATE TABLE CONTRACT ( CONTRACT_ID NUMBER(19,0) DEFAULT 1 NOT NULL, LAST_UPDATE DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE, STATUS VARCHAR2(32), ORDER_NUMBER VARCHAR2(32), RENTAL_DATE DATE, CUSTOMER_ID NUMBER(19,0) DEFAULT 1 NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (CONTRACT_ID) );
    I need to establish a one-to-one relationship here (a contract has one car associated to it, car will only belong to one active contract ) .. If i add foreign key to Car and reference Contract
    ALTER TABLE CAR ADD FOREIGN KEY (CAR_ID) REFERENCES CONTRACT (CONTRACT_ID) ;
    Then use reverse engineering to create hibernate mappings (in eclipse), i get a one-to-many relationship (contract has many cars)? how do i enforce table to to be interpreted this way?

    sonx wrote:
    (a contract has one car associated to it, car will only belong to one active contract ) The relationship is from contract to car.
    .. If i add foreign key to Car and reference Contract
    ALTER TABLE CAR
         ADD FOREIGN KEY (CAR_ID)
         REFERENCES CONTRACT (CONTRACT_ID)
    ;This relationship is from car to contract.
    Which contradicts what you said above.
    And isn't logical. A car will over time belong to different contracts. Each contract retains the original car. The car can't contain all of them.

  • One to One relationship

    Oracle 11.0.1.7:
    Is it ok to have foreign key as primary key in one to one relationship? Is there any drawbacks? I have 2 options:
    1. Create sequence primary key
    2. Or make foreign key as primary key
    Which one is better and why? I like # 2 just because I don't have to create extra index, sequence and column.

    user628400 wrote:
    Oracle 11.0.1.7:
    Is it ok to have foreign key as primary key in one to one relationship? If the relationship is truely one-to-one, then you haven't properly normalized your data.
    "Every nonkey attribute must be functionally dependent upon
         the key, (1NF)
         the whole key, and (2NF)
         nothing but the key, (3NF)
         so help you Codd."
    Is there any drawbacks? I have 2 options:
    1. Create sequence primary key
    2. Or make foreign key as primary key
    Which one is better and why? I like # 2 just because I don't have to create extra index, sequence and column.

  • Many-to-one relationships

    I'm trying to implement a many-to-one relationship similar to the one, for example, between an OrderLineItem and a Product.
    I managed to create the beans and define the relationship using deploytool.
    What I'm trying to understand is how can I prevent a Product instance from being deleted when it is involved in the relationship described above?
    Currently, under Sun's reference implementation server, I am allowed to delete a Product even if there are OrderLineItems that reference it.
    There is one line printed out in the window running j2ee -verbose:
    com.sun.ejb.containers.EntityContainer$EJBTxKey
    The record in the Product table is deleted nonetheless.
    Another weird thing is that the server does not allow me to deploy two beans involved in a many-to-one relationships with the Product bean if they are using the same CMR field name. What I get is a compilation error at the deployment time.
    I'd appreciate any input.

    They way I handle this is to hide the creation/manipulation/deletion of the bean behind a manager - for example a singleton session bean. I NEVER allow the direct creation/deletion of entity beans except through manager classes. This is quite a common J2EE pattern, whose name escapes me at the moment.
    Your manager would have a method like delete(int productId), which would delete the matching Product entity bean, and would then search the OrderLineItem beans for the matching Product primary key.

  • Many to one relationships strange behavior

    I have a problem with two many to one relationships.
    The problem appears from the dirty mechanism of cmr/cmp fields.
    When I have two “many-to-one” relationships ex:
    A n..1 B
    A n..1 C
    Navigability: B -> A
              A <-> C
    When I put in ejb-jar.xml the B to A relation first, the bugs appear. The dirty mechanism work chaotic. The problem is in the generated code for the PersistenceManager and Wrapper of the A bean.
    In the Wrapper the only fields with dirty mecansim are the real fields from bean which are navigable. In the PersistenceManager class are the same fields like in the BeanWrapper plus the fake fields for relationship. But the fake fields are intercalated with real fields and the dirty flag values are not the same with the dirty flags from BeanWrapper. Result: chaotic updates.
    Solution(workaround – not elegant): put first the relation which has navigability from A to C and second A to B.

    They way I handle this is to hide the creation/manipulation/deletion of the bean behind a manager - for example a singleton session bean. I NEVER allow the direct creation/deletion of entity beans except through manager classes. This is quite a common J2EE pattern, whose name escapes me at the moment.
    Your manager would have a method like delete(int productId), which would delete the matching Product entity bean, and would then search the OrderLineItem beans for the matching Product primary key.

  • Aggregate with a one-to-one relationship

    Is there a way for mapping a one-to-one relationship between an aggregate and a regular descriptor according to the class the aggregate is aggregated to?
    For example Class A contains Class B as an aggregate. Class B is associated to Class C in a one-to-one relationship. Class A' may also use the same aggregation.
    How to specify the table reference so that it is respectively a Table C to Table A database relationship and a Table C to Table A' relationship.
    I hope this is clear!?
    Please advice,
    Chris

    If I understand you have a shared aggregate B from A and A' that has a 1-1 relationship to C.
    To map this in the Mapping Workbench, first map A, A'. Then map the aggregate B, in mapping its 1-1 to C you should be able to choose any of the foreign keys references in A (or the first descriptor that mapped to the aggregate). You then go into the A and A' aggregate mappings and map the foreign key field in the aggregate to the foreign key field in the source descriptor's table.
    If defining the mappings in code you can choose to map the aggregate to either table, or the commonly named fields. If the field names in the source descriptor's table differ, then you provide a field-name translation in the aggregate mapping.

  • Redefining the one-to-one relationship selection criteria

    In this example, one instance of Contract is related to one instance of Condition.
    Class Contract is associated to table CONTRACT and Class Condition is associated to table CONDITION.
    CONTRACT contains only one field : ID (primary key) CONDITION contains one foreign key field to CONTRACT (CONTRACT_OID), one START_DATE and one END_DATE.
    When loading the contract, I must take one given date (myGivenDate) in consideration so that only the condition including this date (START_DATE <= myGivenDate < END_DATE) is loaded.
    I consider redefining the selection criteria of the one-to-one relationship by adding the criteria on the date. But how to introduce the givenDate parameter?
    Please advice,
    Chris

    Hello Chris,
    I'm sure you might have already seen the discussions on some of the pitfalls of implementing this, but if you haven't, check out:
    Re: 1:M filtering
    I would suggest instead not mapping the Contract -> Condition relationship, and instead query for it when you require the related Condition objects. This query could be hidden inside the Contract objects getCondition method so it is still hiden, and still ensure that what is in the cache reflects the database.
    If this will not an option, then there is a suggestion made by Stephen that maybe what you are looking for in the thread at:
    Associating selection criteria w/One-to-Many (1-M) indirect queries
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • IPhone3 - can I sync onto multiple PCs running iTunes ? or is this a one-one relationship ?

    Can I sync onto multiple PCs running iTunes ? or is this a one-one relationship ?
    My situation - use home computer for music etc., boat computer for weather file downloads,officecomputer for email / pictures ...
    Thank you

    There is an App called Weathertrack, which pulls from the web GRIB files (weather information), that I would like to download onto the laptop we have on the boat, that runs some routing software (SeaTrack), that in turn integrates weather, tide, GPS etc to help with vessel navigation.
    I can obviously do this from my home computer (this is the one that has the 1-1 sync relationship), but I don't want to empty the IPhone content whilst on the boat ...
    If you can think of a way of making this happen, I would be very appreciative. Both PCs are windows based, home is Vista, boat is XP.
    Kind regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • Standard user cannot use creative cloud

    The most recent creativecloud update made it so that my users can not use CC. Adding them to local administrator group fixes this. I only have 8 workstations to worry about so I never bothered with the packager and deployment tools. I thought maybe t

  • Help Required in XI certification.

    Does anyone have any sample questions to XI certification for Development Consultants ( TBIT40 , TBIT41, TBIT42, TBIT43, TBIT44). I would be grateful if you could pass it on to [email protected] Thanks & Regards, Jona

  • How do you remove Firefox from computer, will not delete from "Add/delete hardware"

    Have tried to remove firefox from computer. Tried "add/remove harware, programs" from control panel, won't do anything keeps popping back up. Several months ago firefox crashed and computer would not let me log on to the internet. Went back to intern

  • Hy, how can i make filter in numbers, like in excel? can anybody help me?

    i am new in mac, and of course in numbers, until now i use exel, and i know to work with it, but now i want to use numbers, so...i want to make a filter like in excel.but i don.t know how. Thanks.

  • Webservice authenticate by microsoft active directory

    Hi, i am a newbie about web services... i want to create a 'secure' web service that user have to provide user name and password so as to call the web service.. i am using jdeveloper 10.1.3.1... i secured the web service by wss (set through web servi