One user or more...

Hi,
Hi, we have an application in .NET -> Oracle and I want to know that he is more optimal
One schema and all users of application connected like this one
One schema for each user of application
Thank's

It may depend on access rights you want to give to your users . If all users have the same rights, then you might choose one schema only, and all users connect to that one, otherwise you should create a schema owner of all application objects, and other schemas, one for each user, or only few schemas, grouped by privileges.
Of course the first solution is the easiest one, in any other case you have to create roles, grant privileges, create synonyms, and so on.

Similar Messages

Unknown user occupy more USER I/O

Hello friends, Our environement is ORACLE 10g ON WINDOWS 2003 platform. We use to receive call from some users that system is very slow in response. While I check through OEM , one user consuming more USER I/O, 90%. But that users for IT department user and I confirmed no one working with that user account. I dont know how this user session is automatically created and consuming more I/O. I stop all the scheduled jobs that used that user name. Its regarded less of the time, some time morning , some time night
this user sesseion created autmatically. I killed those sessions, even than its creating some other session with the same user name and occupying more I/O. Kindly help me to solve.

Hi,
We use to receive call from some users that system is very slow in responseDo these users shared same applicaiton? Means, is whole database slow (all users are suffering) or only a few users suffering while running same applicaiton?
one user consuming more USER I/O, 90%This is this user's part in total IO on the system which not necessarily means that IO is slow.
Course of Action
Through OEM check the system performance page, what is CPU in IO wait matrix value.
Through OEM, also check Disk busy rate for the disk where your database is residing
What are the details of user sessions which is consuming 90% IO. Username, session from which machine, from which program etc.
OEM performance page will also show you what SQL it is running. If no one owns this user, just lock it and check who shouts.
Salman

Can I put more than one user under one Apple ID account. I want to let other family members use imessage on their own Apple device. Or is there another way to get this end result?

Can I put more than one user under one Apple ID account. I want to let other family members use imessage on their own Apple device. Or is there another way to get this end result?

You can seach the net for solutions like this one http://appletvvpn.com/how-to-connect-apple-tv-2-to-vpn/ another idea is to use a PC as the control and fit that with a wireless card and set up a ad hoc wireless network that the Apple TV uses.

Problem accessing hard drive for more than one user at the same time

Hello all,
I recently bought a 2nd generation AirPort Extreeme 802.11n to replace a cheapo wireless router. The main reason I wanted to get the AirPort was so I could attach a USB hard drive which holds iTunes music files Originaly I had a G4 MDD and this was a second internal hard drive. Since my wife and son also share my Mac, we stored the iTunes music folder there, so we could all access the files. That worked fine.
Then I got a early 2009 iMac and gave my wife the G4. My son also has a G3 iBook, using the wireless internet conection. At first I had the drive in an external case attached via Firewire. Both my iMac and my wife's G4 are attached to the network using ethernet, not wireless. She was able to access the music files so long as my Mac was on, but the connection was flaky.
So as mentioned, I picked up a used AirPort Extreme from OWC, mainly to attach the hard drive, since it's no longer in my Mac. It took some fiddling, and I was honestly surpsied that the APE was trickier to set up than expected, but now I have the external drive mounting, and we can all access the files from any of the Macs in the house. It works great except for one thing. If I'm logged into my iMac, and then another family member logs in on the same iMac, we don't all have access to the hard drive. It's still mounted, but the you have no permission to view the files on it.
Then if I remount it, I can access the files, but now the other user can't.
So in a nutshell, only one user can access the drive at the same time from the iMac, but we can all access it from different Macs.
Anyone have an idea of why this is happening and how to remidy it?

This is the boilerplate text often used in connection to saving to a network (please NOTE the part where it explains that normally, it does work, but that it is impossible to troubleshoot someone else's network remotely, and that's why it's not supported by Adobe):
If you are opening files over a network or saving them to a network server, please cease and desist immediately in the event you are currently experiencing problems with one or more files. Working across a network is not supported.
See:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/406/kb406793.html
Copy the CLOSED file from your server to your local hard disk, work on it, save it again to your local hard disk, close it, and copy the closed file back to the server.
Of course, the fact that Adobe does not support working across a network does not necessarily mean it won't work. It should.
Adobe's position is that there are too many variables in a network environment for them to guarantee that everything will work correctly in every network, especially given the fact that if something does not work properly, it's probably the network's fault, and Adobe has no way of troubleshooting your network.
If you can't work locally, you are on your own, and if something happens, you're on your own. If you must work from a server, make sure your network administrator is a competent professional.
When problems arise, a lot of valuable work can be lost.

How we can lock No more than one user can use the table at a single time

Hi Abapers,
0) which function modules to lock & unlock a table.
1) When you execute the program, we can check if there is any lock on this table. If yes, the user should be able to only view the table contents and not modify.
2) If there is no lock, then lock the table and go into change mode.
3) On exiting from the program, unlock the table using the function module.
4) more than one user can't modify the table just display.
Note: If there is any lock, display message saying table is locked.
Plz help me for this requirement.
Thanks
Nani

Hello Nani
Have a look at the lock object EMMARAE (Lock MARA and MARM/MAKT exclusively) in transaction SE11.
Inspect the F1 help for field Lock mode:
DE ENQMODE
Short Text
 Lock mode
Definition
 Defines how to synchronize table record access by several users.
The following modes exist:
 Exclusive lock
 The locked data can be read or processed by one user only. A request
 for another exclusive lock or for a shared lock is rejected.
 Shared lock
 Several users can read the same data at the same time, but as soon
 as a user edits the data, a second user can no longer access this
 data. Requests for further shared locks are accepted, even if they
 are issued by different users, but exclusive locks are rejected.
 Exclusive but not cumulative lock
 Exclusive locks can be requested by the same transaction more than
 once and handled successively, but an exclusive but not cumulative
 lock can only be requested once by a given transaction. All other
 lock requests are rejected.
If you want to lock a standard table search whether the table is used in lock objects (Where-Used-List). If it is a customer table you have to create your own lock object (including two function modules: one for enqueuing and the other for dequeuing).
The lock modules can be found in menu GoTo -> Lock Modules.
Given these lock modules the logic should be quite clear after starting the program:
1. Request lock -> if successful, continue in Change mode; -> if failed, continue in Display mode
2. Before leaving the report remove lock (note: no problem if no lock has been set in the beginning).
Regards
Uwe

Using Remote Desktop Admin app in more than one user account.

Is possible to have the ARD admin app use the same database and settings over more than one user account?
eg. I have ARD setup on my Mac as I am in charge of our organisations Macs. However if I am away for a few weeks, one of our other techs would be able to turn on my Mac, log in to a generic account, open ARD and it would be set up exactly as I have it in my user account.
I know that I could manually set up ARD in the other account, but with the number of machines we have I would rather not have to re-enter all those admin passwords all over again, and then have to remember to update ARD in the other account everytime we get a new machine or make other changes.

In theory, you could simply copy the com.apple.RemoteDesktop.plist into the preferences folder of the other user. Then they would simply have to know the Remote Desktop Password (which is probably stored in your KeyChain.)
I've never tried this, but it seems like it would work.

How Do I Share My Database Between More Than One User Account on the Same Mac?

How Do I Share My Database Between More Than One User Account on the Same Mac?

How to use multiple iPhone, iPad, or iPod devices with one computer. The only way is for you to have a separate user account to log into on that computer.

Can a user facetime with more than one user at a time

I can use facetime with Macbook and connect to another Macbook user on another WIFI network... I was wondering if one can facetime with more than one user at a time?

ellis911 wrote:
I can use facetime with Macbook and connect to another Macbook user on another WIFI network... I was wondering if one can facetime with more than one user at a time?
Only if you have more than one device running FaceTime at your end.
Mac Pro Quad Core (Early 2009) 2.93Ghz Mac OS X (10.6.5); MacBook Pro (13 inch, Mid 2009) 2.26GHz (10.6.5)
LED Cinema Display; G4 PowerBook 1.67GHz (10.4.11); iBookSE 366MHz (10.3.9); External iSight; iPod4touch4.2.1

How can I see if my program is for more than one user? We think we have bought in design for more users, but can not find out how to get in for more than one?

How can I see if my program is for more than one user? We think we have bought in design for more users, but can not find out how to get in for more than one?

If you bought a CC for team, you can log in at http://adobe.com and insert the e-mail that you gave at the moment at the purchase and than you can manage and see you product/plan/team.
If I was not clear you can use the following link to help you solving your issue:
Creative Cloud Help | Manage your Creative Cloud for teams membership
If your not clear about this situation, contact with an agent of Adobe, by chat or phone. Use the following link to see the type of support you have on this matter:
http://adobe.com/getsupport
I think this will help you.
Regards

Purchased CC for business and can only assign one user. How can I assign more users to have it on all 4 computers in the office?

Purchased CC for business and can only assign one user. How can I assign more users to have it on all 4 computers in the office?

Hi there
You would need to purchase a seat for each user.
What you currently have is 1 seat = 1 user.
Kind regards
Bev

Can we start more than one user created database at the same time

Hi.,
Can we start/work more than one user created database at the same time ??
--Shyam

Hi Shyam,
I really dont understand what you have asked?
If your question is can we start more than one database at the same time then the answer to that is yes but provided to have enough resources on your server to support running of two or more different databases on the same machine.
Ex Senior DBA

Adobe Form used by more than one user simultaneously

Friends,
I am working on an online interactive Adobe form using Web Dynpro ABAP.
once the user enters the data and clicks the submit button, the data is sent to ztables.
the scenario is that more than one user can possibly use the same form simultaneously. in that case, how can i maintain synchronization ie how to avoid multiple users from using the form at the same time, when the form is already being filled by one user already.
I am guessing i have to do something with ADS for this.
Any thoughts or ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards.

Hi Bertrand,
The purpose of allowing only one user is to ensure data consistency as you have guessed.
Is there a program name or transaction code where i can look up the lock entries and see if i can apply them to my web dynpro application or the adobe form.
I would greatly appreciate your help.
Thanks and Regards.

Can we set "IN PROCESS" Status to more than one User

Hi,
As per my client current scenario every work item will be sent to 3 useru2019s (One is the supervisor of the other two users). If any one of the user executes the work item it will automatically call a Ztransaction and displays the screen. When any one of the user executes the workitem, then the workitems will dissappears from rest of the users inboxes; Setting "IN PROCESS" status for the person who executed the workitem. The workitem will be in "IN PROCESS" Status untill the User Press "SAVE" button in the transaction.
If the person whose executed the workitem (IN PROCESS) status, has gone on unplanned leave; then the supervisor wants to forward the workitem of the current user to other user. How can he forward?
Is there any option to set "In Process" status to more than one User? [Supervisor and Person who executed the workitem]
Please provide me any advice to the above requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Ajay Kumar

Can you ask your workflow administrator to forward the workitem to the user you want to be sent it to.
I tried a small case wherein I had forwarded a workitem to myself and another user.
As I executed it , it went into status IN process and at the same time it got removed from other users inbox .
Now I went to T Code SWI1 and forwarded iut to another user say USABC.
As a result the workitem again went into status "Ready" and into the inbox of the user ABC.
So , you can try this in your case with the help of your workflow administrator.
Another way is to create the other user as a substitue of the user who is currently executing the workitem.

How to create new user with more than one default folder

hi
A new user created in OCS has only one default folder(Inbox).
I want to create new user with customized default folder.
for example:
a new user has more than one default folder(Inbox,Outbox,Draft,Dustbin...)
And also I want to automaticly enable the functions:
When sending messages, place a copy in Outbox
Keep message drafts in Draft
Move deleted messages to Dustbin
who know that?
thanks

The same reason that Apple and 3rd Party vendors put multi-size templates in one file I expect. I am trying to construct an in-house standard template for use in our company, and it is easier to manage if there is only one file to send to people rather than many - both initially and for subsequent edits / updates to the template.
Of course it would be possible to create several templates (one for each size). But since it is clear that templates can be combined, it appears sensible to do this - unless the doing of it is horridly complicated

More than one user "using an expression" in a BPM Task

Hello,
I want to send a notification step for multiple users. I see two options
1. Choose one or more UME principals.
2. Use an expression.
However I have to send the notification for more than one user using an expression. I'm using this expression,
getPrincipal(DO_xyz)
but this only works for one user. I need something like this
getPrincipal(DO_xyz); getPrincipal(DO_xyz2); getPrincipal(DO_xyz3)
But this is not possible. I can't use a group because all this information is dynamic and it's born within the process.
Please, How can I solve this?
Best Regards
SU

Hello Abhijeet,
I've seen that I can use the getPrincipals adding in the XSD an string with 1..* cardinality. However I don't know how to map an attribute from the UITask to that new attribute in the XSD because in Web Dynpro I can't create an string with cardinality 1..*
I've tried to create a node (1..*) with a String inside in the UI but I couldn't map it to the process context, it shows me an error that I cannot map a node to a String.
Thanks
Regards
SU

One user or more...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for