Only detect presence or absence of top level folders.

If a top level folder is missing, please have Lightroom assume that all subfolders are missing on revmovable drives. If the drive is reattached and LT sees the top folder again, please let it assume that all the subfolders are there also, until we use a file that is not actually there.
Long winded waiting on drives after reconnection is not necessary. Or at least give us an option to tell Lightroom that the drive is actually there, don't bother checking further.

Unfortunately it does not working. I am using jboss AS 7.
Structure details:
- ear contains war
- the war contains the beans.xml (with alternative entry) in WEB-INF
- jar B is located in war in WEB-INF/lib (jar B contains also beans.xml in META-INF)
- injection point is in a JSF controller (jar in WEB-INF/lib in war)
Always I1 is injected. But I do not know if I explained it clearly. I1 is always present. I2 is optional but shall have a higher priority.

Similar Messages

MobileMe top-level folders not accepting mail messages

Strange thing...
Now that iPhone has "push" mail, I decided to take all my mail from Mail.app on my mac up to my MobileMe account. I wanted to do this as-is, but it's not quite that simple... However, the whole folder structure and all e-mails therein are now happily living in MobileMe.
Except that they are not! All the Top-Level folders that contain other folders are now white in Mail.app, and don't exist at all in MobileMe. It's as if all folders were one level higher than they should be - all folders directly contained in a white parent folder appear as top level folders in MobileMe!! On the iPhone, they do exist, but their names are greyed out. Both in Mail.app and on the iPhone, they are empty and you cannot add mail messages to them even though, in Mail.app "on my Mac" they still contain mail and will happily accept mail messages...
What gives? Is there something I need to do to change them from "folder folders" into "mail folders that happen to also have folders in them"???
G>

Not a single answer or post on this...
I decided to create new folders and add a dummy place holder message in them, then move over all the subfolders to this one. There was a bit of strange behaviour when synchronising with MobleMe (old folder disappeared without my deleting it, etc) but now all is well and all my top level folders can accept mails.
During the process, it seems like MobileMe didn't know that these folder existed - when renaming or deleting them, I do an error saying that they did not exist. Indeed, on MobileMe, they did not exist and this resulted in all the first level subfolders being at the top level in me.com - very messy. It looks a lot better now!
G>

Working around bogus top-level folders in catalog

I have a catalog originally created on Mac and then moved to Windows, and it has two poison top-level folders that cause various SDK methods to fail. For example, they cause catalog:setActiveSources({folder}) to have an assertion failure.
For one of the folders, folder:getPath() returns nil. For another of the folders, folder:getPath() returns a Windows UNC file path that doesn't exist. I discovered this heuristic for identifying these bogus folders:
function isValidTopLevelFolder (folder)
    local success, f = LrTasks.pcall (function ()
        return catalog:getFolderByPath (folder:getPath ()) end)
    return success and f
    end
I've already provided this catalog to Becky Sowada of Adobe, following up on a bug report in the feedback forum. But I thought this work-around might be of usefulness to others someday.

Not quite, what I wanted to do… But, I think I can work with the "Unified folder view".

Not all Top level folders showing item count

Hi there, I have Aperture 3.2.2 running on OSX 10.6.8.
I use referenced files and a folder structure with a top folder and projects nested.
Some of my top level folders when clicked, show ALL images in the projects nested below. Others do not. When I examine them in finder, nothing jumps out at me that is different. Have you any experience with this happening? Thanks, Deb

Here is a screen shot. Some of the blue folders will show all images nested in the projects below, some show nothing. ie: 2013 shows all, but 2012, shows nothing. You must click on each individual project to reveal the items contained. I would like to click on each top level folder and see all items nested beneath. There must be something I'm doing different, but for the life of me, can't figure it out. Why some show and some don't.

Can the top level navigation be three levels?

Hello, everyone!
How many top level navigation can i have at most? It seems that SAP Portal just provide two levels.
Thanks.
Ruanrq.

Hi,
There is only possible for 0,1,2 top level navigation. Not possible for 3 levels. Check the below link for details.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5a/33befa45ca7f459b24d0c5d51d0749/frameset.htm
But you can customize the top level navigation. Check the below document.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/dae78be4-0601-0010-c9ab-c0b8d86fac07
Regards
Basheer

How to make the report shows only top level steps

HI,
I use many subsequences in my tests. I have no interest to see them in the report. How can I force the report to show only top level steps?
Thanks
Rafi

I needed to prevent 'Skipped' steps from appearing in my reports. One way to do this is to override the SequenceFilePostResultListEntry callback in the model. You do this by clicking on Edit and then Sequence File Callbacks and then find SequenceFilePostResultListEntry in the list and click the Add button.
Edit your new callback in your sequence file to check for a pre-condition. In my case I checked for Parameters.Result.Status == "Skipped" since that parameter is set to Skipped, Done, etc. based on the result.
If the condition was true then my only step in the callback was to set Parameters.DiscardResults = True. The TestStand model will then throw that result away when it processes the report. You could add a step for every type of data you wish to discard.
A second method that is easier to implement, but time consuming, is to select each step you DON'T want in your report and bring up the Properties for that step. Under the Run Options tab, deselect the Record Results box. That will keep the results of that step out of the report, but you have to do this for EVERY step you don't want to have reported. The first approach I provided acts to filter the results.
If you aren't sure what the Parameters.Result.Status will be, then set a breakpoint after that step is executed and scan the parameters when the sequence is halted there. You can then detect the actual text used as a result for that step, such as "Done" and can set your pre-condition appropriately.

Possible to Have ToC Default to Show Only Top Level (collapse sublevels)?

Howdy!
I'll bet I'm not the only one wishing for this. Let's say you're using Captivate 4's Table of Contents feature with a longish movie of Cp slides, which is chunked into bite-size sections content-wise. In the ToC, though, you can't mimic that same organization scheme; at least, the learner would first need to collapse all the ToC folders you've created so they see only the top-level listing.
This can be a critical issue: keeping the at-first-glance list in the ToC brief enough to be inviting to learners, yet allowing learners to drive which details are currently visible.
A movie's topical hierarchy could be along these lines, for example ...
Section 1 - National Brands
What are National Brands?
Why Are They Important to Our Business?
Working with Nat. Brands
Practice Your Knowledge
Section 2 - International Brands
What are International Brands?
Why Are They Important to Our Business?
Working with Intl. Brands
Practice Your Knowledge
You'd like to organize the ToC to show only the section titles (1st level) and to suppress the 2nd-level detail (slide titles) until the learner chooses to expand the folder to see those details.
I've tried things like grouping the slides into sections in the Storyboard view and organizing the slides into sections strictly within the ToC -- both to no avail.
Has anyone solved for this need yet?
I'm all ears, and you'd be doing learners of the world a huge favor.
Thanks!

Hi, Jim.
Thanks for being 'on the case' and looking into this so quickly. Your
findings are encouraging, although my user base is generally working with
IE 6 and FP8 or 9.
Since the only thing I may influence is getting IT to help push out FP10,
I'm hoping it's more of a player- than a browser-version issue.
I'll test things out by Monday and let you know the results. Wish me luck!
Dave
                                                                                From:       Jim Leichliter <[email protected]>
To:         Dave Tressler <[email protected]>
Date:       03/26/2010 06:02 PM
Subject:    Possible to Have ToC Default to Show Only Top Level (collapse
              sublevels)?
Dave,
I just tested this on my local web server and it worked fine. I created a
blank project with 8 slides. Created my TOC with grouping... 2 slides in
each group. I turned on self paced learning. I tried with and without the
widget and it picked up where I left off in either case. See
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B86WuEq6SVwRNWIwMjhjODctMjE2Yy00MWE2LWI5YzEtMGQxYzNjOWQ0Z mI2&hl=en.
I published using FP10 and IE8 to view. Notice any difference between
your project and this one?
Thanks,
Jim Leichliter

Hide Top level navigation if user assigned only one role

Hi,
I would like to hide the top level navigation if user assigned with only one role.
I can create role based rule to show desktop using Master rule collection, but is it possible by doing to with role count.
If user has multiple roles show desktop1 else show desktop2

not sure if this possible ,you may check feasibility of creating a application which checks user role count and if role count is = 1 load the Portal url (URL alais) which had TLN iview invisible in the same window else do nothing and load the portal with the desktop which has tln.
Put the application in framewrk page which has TLN visible.
create a URL alias and create a desktop -framework page which dont have TLN ,assign this desktop to this URL alias in rule collection set its priority before user conditions check in rule collection so that it has high priority before user or group check in rule collection.
you can create a poc in sandbox and check if it wiorks?

Budget Control at top level WBS only

Hello All,
I have a requirement from client where I need to activate the Budget control (90% warning and 100% error). I have done the setting accordingly.
Now the scenario is such that when client is doing budgeting, they are allocating the budget only at top level WBS (they have a different legacy, where they are doing there detail planning n budgeting, but since they want the feature of budget control in PS, they will do minimal budgeting in PS). As per my settings when I budget top level WBS and save the availabity control is activated (with no budget on lower level WBS). Now when I try to do some postings/or assign that WBS to PO, even with a value of 1 USD, i am getting an error of budget exceeded, which is fine as per the settings as that WBS is having 0 budget.
The requirement from client side is such that they want AVAC to be activated only at top WBS and do postings to lower WBS. But if the total of lower WBS exceed the budget of top WBS, they should get an warning or error. For example:
WBS level BUDGET ACTUALS
1               100
2                              50
2                              50
so as soon as the actuals touch 100, the system should give an error/warning. Note that the 2nd level WBS are not budgeted in SAP, so budget is 0 on them.
I have 2 questions:
1.Is it possible to activate AVAC only for top WBS ?(without any enhancement/development)
2.How the AVAC will work, if the total of 2nd level WBS exceeds the budget of top WBS (as explained in example above)?
Awating your replies.
Thanks
Sarang

Thanks Virendra, it was useful.
I tried other way round also i.e. by not marking the release tab in OPS9 and activating AVAC in CJ30.It works in that way too.
For my other question, regarding activating AVAC only at top level, we can achiebve that by using transaction control in user status.
Thanks
Sarang

Only one top level element is allowed in an XML document. Line 2, Position 2

I get this error when I try to run an xsql query with a where clause:
Only one top level element is allowed in an XML document. Line 2, Position 2
<font size='-1' face='monospace'>XSQL-005: XSQL page is not well-formed.</font><BR>
-^
Here is the xsql query I tried to use.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsql:query connection="xmlbook" xmlns:xsql="urn:oracle-xsql">
select * from companytable where companynumber < 1000;
</xsql:query>
null

You need to escape certain characters in order to make XML documents well formed. The problem in this case is the less than sign between companynumber and 1000. You should replace it with <
I recommend reading a good XML book - "Building Oracle XML Applications" by Steve Muench, for instance.
Brian

XML Error: Only segments are allowed on top level,found non-segment E1EDK03

Hi,
I have a problem in my senario of receiving XML files with a Business Connector (4.7), adding some data to certain segments and elements, do some mapping steps and then convert the XML file to SAP IDoc. Then the IDoc should be send to R/3 system via ALE.
The senario works so far, if I test it with the "Send XML file.." option in the menu "Test" of the Business Connectior itself.
If I try to send the XML data as string in my browser the following error always occurs:
$localizedError:
com.wm.lang.xml.WMDocumentException: Invalid IDocXML document: Only segments are allowed on top level, found non-segment E1EDK03
$errorType:
com.wm.util.coder.InvalidDatatypeException
If I send send a string containing the XML data incl. the data I actually wanted to add in a flow step, it works.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks,
Kai
Message was edited by: Kai Lerch-Baier

I had been using MC Internet Explorer until this . Have compared this one to functioning XML viewable with MS Internet explorer. Below is code I am using trying to resolve this problem.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?sap.transform simple?>
<tt:transform xmlns:tt="http://www.sap.com/transformation-templates">
<tt:root name="ecrtas"/>
<tt:template>
<tt:loop ref="ecrtas">
<ImportInstructions>
<ProjectSponsorInstruction>
<Instruction mode="Add">
   <SponsorName tt:value-ref="SPONME"/>
   <SponsorNumber>
     <IdValue name="Sponsor Number"><tt:value ref="SPONSOR"/></IdValue>
     </SponsorNumber>
    <SponsorType tt:value-ref="SPONTYP"/>
</Instruction>
</ProjectSponsorInstruction>
</ImportInstructions>
</tt:loop>
</tt:template>
</tt:transform>
Thank you again

How to make spry menubar top level only appear for browsers with java turned off

I was under the impression that just the top level of the horizontal spry menubar appears when someone with Java turned off views it...now I see that the entire unordered list appears vertically and takes up the whole page....is there a way to make just the top level menubar items appear when java is turned off in viewers browser?
Thank you in advance for any insight you can provide.
Lois

When you disable Javascript in your browser...and it is Javascript not Java... if your menubar is properly constructed, the submenus do not appear, only the top level menu items.
It sounds to me as if you are turning off style rendering in Dreamweaver itself, or have not properly linked your CSS stylesheet to your page.
When CSS is linked properly, the submenus are "hidden" with left: -10000px; (a BIG distance) offscreen to the left of the Viewport. They stay there unless Javascript is turned on. It is Javascript that "calls them back" onto the Viewport.
Give me a link, Lois, and I'll check into your page for you...
Beth

Robocopy /XD only applied to top level

Hi,
I have one file server (OldServer) with all my user home folders and I need to spilt these onto 4 seperate file servers
My plan is to put home folders begining with
A to D on server1
E to H on server2
I to O on server3
P to Z on server4
My script below would be used for "server1", it copies folders begining with A, B, C and D to the new location. But the issue is now that it also limits the sub folders. so subfolder \\OldServer\HomeFolder\BLOGGS\zzz does not get RoboCopied.
I need for the /XD command to only apply to the top level structure, and for all sub folder to copy
robocopy "OldServer\HomeFolder "Server1\HomeFolder" /MIR /COPY:DATSO /XD E* F* G* H* I* J* K* L* M* N* O* P* Q* R* S* T* U* V* w* X* Y* Z*
Any thoughts?
Thanks Tony

Hi Tony,
When you use /XD option to exclude directories that match the specified names and paths, the specified folders in subfolders are also excluded. I think you need to copy entire subfolder in the HomeFolder one by one or using the full path name to exculue directories.
Best Regards,
Mandy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

I have to print two labels using single XML file.Error:Only one top level e

Hi,
I have to print two labels using single XML file. But its giving error:
[Error] Error -1072896683 - Line: 38 Pos: 2 Error: Only one top level element is allowed in an XML document.
Below is my XMl file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE labels SYSTEM "label.dtd">
<labels FORMAT="lib://FRD/PurchasedDoor.btw" PRINTERNAME="IBM 6700-R80 (300 dpi)" _QUANTITY="1">
<label>
<variable name= "Color">AUTUMN</variable>
<variable name= "Special_Message_Attribute">MSG*</variable>
<variable name= "Special_Message">This is special Message Label</variable>
<variable name= "Model"></variable>
<variable name= "Build_Date">09-APR-12</variable>
<variable name= "Assy_Cart"></variable>
<variable name= "Assy_Slot"></variable>
<variable name= "Finish_Cart"></variable>
<variable name= "Finish_Slot"></variable>
<variable name= "Serial_Number">1945.1.1.2-1</variable>
<variable name= "Serial_Number_Barcode">1945.1.1.2-1</variable>
<variable name= "Specie">BIRCH</variable>
<variable name= "Truck_Group"></variable>
<variable name= "Label_Sequence_No">1</variable>
<variable name= "WIP_Cart"></variable>
<variable name= "WIP_Slot"></variable>
<variable name= "Cabinet_Sequence_No">110</variable>
<variable name= "JC"></variable>
<variable name= "Thickness"> </variable>
<variable name= "Width"> </variable>
<variable name= "Length"> </variable>
<variable name= "Overlay"></variable>
<variable name= "Options">B30</variable>
<variable name= "Profile_No"></variable>
<variable name= "Door_Style">NEWBERRY</variable>
<variable name= "Glaze"></variable>
<variable name= "Shape"></variable>
<variable name= "Glass"></variable>
<variable name= "Hinge_Side"></variable>
<variable name= "Hinge_Type"></variable>
<variable name= "EGE"></variable>
</label>
<labels FORMAT="lib://FRD/SpecialMessage.btw" PRINTERNAME="IBM 6700-R80 (300 dpi)" _QUANTITY="1">
<label>
<variable name= "Serial_Number">1945.1.1.2-1</variable>
<variable name= "Special_Message">This is special Message Label</variable>
<variable name= "Cabinet_Sequence_No">110</variable>
</label>
</labels>
Please suggest.

>
XML can only have one root element per file.
>
from XML Document: The Root Element

How to release top-level VI (only) source code?

Hello,
I am developing an addon to an application I already have. The application is large (over 1,500 VI's) and the VIs are set up to compile with mostly default settings (there's a top-level VI, a few with Front Panel visible, most of them are not visible).
The customer wants the source code to the work I'm going to do, and it's going to use many existing sub-VI's. The addon itself will be a sub-VI (I have a Main.vi that basically opens 'screens', and this is a new screen). The existing sub-VI's basically do the data collection and processing, and the new code will do some additional processing and have a nice GUI to the existing code. The customer wants the source so they can make modifications as needed.
Is there any easy way to provide just the source for the top-level VI? Basically, I want to give them M.vi, where M.vi calls n.vi, o.vi... etc, but o-z.vi need to remain closed-source. Also, M.vi is called by Main.vi, which opens screens A-M.vi
One option is do copy the entire application, then open every sub-VI and save it without Source Code. But with so many files, this seems like a bad idea. I also then have to maintain two applications.
Any good ideas out there? It seems so easy in other languages (use object files) that it seems like there should be a solution here I'm not seeing.... Thanks!
Message Edited by rnelsonee on 06-02-2010 08:28 AM
Message Edited by rnelsonee on 06-02-2010 08:31 AM
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Dont know if this is the best solution for you, but you can create a "virtual folder" in the LabVIEW project with all the sub-VIs that you want to keep closed-source. Then create Source Distribution build specifications in the project and remove the block diagrams assign passwords to all VIs in the virtual folder. See attached pics.
Attachments:
Project.JPG ‏23 KB
SrcDist.JPG ‏62 KB

Only detect presence or absence of top level folders.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for