Only one EhP release is allowed aditionally:

Hello Gurus,
at mopz for our prod. system ERP 6.0 EHP3 we get always the error message
Error Only one EhP release is allowed additionally:
Information Make sure you have implememented note 1287216
Information Select at least one of the technical usages additionally:
Information **HCM - Learning Solution**
Information **Learning Solution - ABAP only**
if we want to do a stack collection for EHP4.
Additionally we can not select the RED technical usage *Learning Solution - ABAP only* and the GREY technical usage *HCM - Learning Solution* .
The checkboxes are greyed out.
There are some solution?
regards
Ch. Fischer

Hi
If you will go in SMSY transaction then slect your sysrem and on right side you will get the screen where all usage types are defined for your system..
there you need to select learning solution and HCM one and then you will be able to select it in MOPZ..
Thanks
Sunny

Similar Messages

Error Only one EhP release is allowed additionally

Short Text
Error Only one EhP release is allowed additionally:
Long Text
Hi experts,
I have installed EHP3 using transaction saint. Now when I try to upgradeto EHP4 , I am getting following error in MOPZ.
Error Only one EhP release is allowed additionally:
Information Make sure you have implememented note 1287216
Information Select at least one of the technical usages additionally:
Information *HCM - Learning Solution*
Information *Learning Solution - ABAP only*
But when I go back on previous screen
learning solution is greyed out and red,
HCM learning solution is also greyed out (not Red).
Even if I choose EHP3, still both these components are greyed out.
I have looked at note 1287216 and 1139602 but can't find what is missing.
please advise how can I make these 2 components selectable .
thanks,
Daljit boparai

Hi,
To apply these components have you generated xml file ? If yes, then is xml file contains these patches ?
Please check and revert back...
Thanks
Sunny

Only one root tag is allowed.

I'm trying to run the following (from Flex 2.0 Online help) :
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml">
<mx:XML id="capitals" format="e4x">
<Capitals label="U.S. State Capitals">
<capital label="AL" value="Montgomery" />
<capital label="AK" value="Juneau"/>
<capital label="AR" value="Little Rock"/>
<capital label="AZ" value="Phoenix"/>
</Capitals>
<Capitals label="Canadian Province Capitals">
<capital label="AB" value="Edmonton" />
<capital label="BC" value="Victoria"/>
<capital label="MB" value="Winnipeg"/>
<capital label="NB" value="Fredericton"/>
</Capitals>
</mx:XML>

<mx:XMLListCollection id="capitalColl"
source="{capitals.Capitals}" />

<mx:Tree id="Tree1" dataProvider="{capitals}"
labelField="@label"
showRoot="false" width="300" />

<mx:Tree id="Tree2" dataProvider="{capitalColl}"
labelField="@label"
width="300" />
</mx:Application>
and I get
Only one root tag is allowed.
Any idea what has to change?
Thanks

Like it says, that is invalid xml. It looks like it is a bug
in the example doc.
Add a root node to the xml and you should be ok.
Tracy

Only one Extractor source is allowed in a data flow ?

Hi,
We have a common scenario (I think this is common for SAP ECC in general) where we have 2 tables, *_ATTR (Attributes) and *_TEXT (descriptions). We extract these using extractors.
Initially when we tried to place 2 in a dataflow, we got an error saying 'Only one Extractor source is allowed in a data flow'.
To work around this, we created 2 embedded dataflows and everything seems to work fine. But when I do a validate all, I get the error:
[Data Flow:DF_ODS_MD_WBS_ELEMENT] Only one Extractor source is allowed in a data flow. (BODI-1116145)
Should I be worried ? My gut feeling is this is a bug in the validate all function, but I could be wrong. Everything seems to run fine, so is it safe to ignore this ?
This currently effects about 5 dataflows, but we have about 40 more to implement like this, so I don't want to get it wrong.
Thanks,
Leigh.

Like it says, that is invalid xml. It looks like it is a bug
in the example doc.
Add a root node to the xml and you should be ok.
Tracy

"Only one EHP Level in the system"?

I am reading a blog called "SAP enhancement packages for SAP ERP".
At page 22, it says:
"An Application system can only consist of one EHP level (e.g. EHP3 or EHP4). Hence installed
EHP components have to be updated with every future EHP implementation."
I do not quite understand above statement.
1) how can a system have 2 EHP levels?
2) If our PROD system is too busy to have the downtime to be updated with the future EHP, what will happen?
Please share your opinion. Thanks!

As of EHP3, you could still install some EHP components. On an ERP 6.00, you could just push SAP_APP to 6.03 and move on. Now if you want another component in your system with an EHP4 version, you can't have some components at EHP3 and some at EHP4. You would install EHP4 for the new component you desire updated and part of the work will be to also update SAP_APP to 6.04.
EHP4 is an UPGRADE process, with shadow instance & all the joy of an upgrade process. You can either run ressource minimized or downtime minimized. In resource minimized, the shadow instance runs on the same server as the main instance. Downtime minimized allow to run the shadow instance on a separate / new server. Anyway you go, you will always have a "Downtime Phase" when you bring back the updated components from the shadow instance toward the real production one.
As with any UPGRADE project, the benefits of installing EHP4 for your business has to weighted against the downtime cost.
Our tests so far on small systems (few data, few users, 120GB database) show ~3 days process from EHP3 to EHP4 (all components) with a downtime phase of about 22 hours using the "resource minimized" path, i.e. shadow & main instance on the same server (4 CPUs, 16GB RAM). Until you give a try at your Sandbox or DEV systems, you won't have realistic figures for your environment.
Good luck!

Only one Currency should be allowed..........

Dear Experts,
How can we make only single currency to be allowed to enter in the sales documents - sales orde / invoice ???
Eg. If we want to create order only in INR and should not be created for any other currency than INR, how we can achieve this??? Is it possible to make iin SAP standard?? Or do we have to go for any programming ??
Thanks in advance
Sagar

Dont think, anything is available to achieve this in SAP standard. You can make the document currency field on the sales document non editable by doing code changes in USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION in program MV45AFZZ . Thanks

Only one delivery to be allowed against one Sales order at item level

Hi,
I have a requirement for some material in sales order if SO quanity is 25 we want that system should allow to create delivery of all 25 quanity one time we try to use Max.Part.Deliv. at item level by amking as 1 but system is juts giving the message and alowing to create multiple delivery, can we map as per our requirement.
regards,
zafar

Hello Zafar,
your requirement of complete delivery required for some materials only, so it has to be taken care manually when user creates sale order, for those specific items complete delivery should be marked at item level (run availability check for the item and mark for complete delivery).
If you want a permanent solution, please go for a development - define a table & maintain all the materials which are required to be delivered as complete delivery and then modify the sales order program, there is a specific include where the abaper can do this code change.
Regards
Suresh.

BADI "COPCMESSAGECONTROL" , only one active implementation ?

Hi,
I'd like to do a custom implementation of the BADI "COPCMESSAGECONTROL", eg
"Z_COPCMESSAGECONTROL".
For this BADI there's a SAP hint, that only one active implementation is allowed.
Cause in our system there's already an active SAP implementation "/CWM/MESSAGE_CK" I don't know,
if I can activate my custom "Z_COPCMESSAGECONTROL" implementation in addition to the SAP implementation.
Any Ideas ? Many thanks in advance !
Regards
Olaf

If you look at the BADI definition in SE18, you'll find that the 'multiple use' flag is NOT set meaning by default this BADI can only be implemented once.
Therefore if you need to add custom coding to this BADI implementation either you add it to the implemented methods (modification) or you deactivate the standard BADI and implement your own BADI by copying the standard coding and adding yours to it (also a modification, but you would have your coding in a Z-class).
However whenever you copy standard SAP code into a custom peogram or class any notes that SAP releases which makes changes to that BADI implementation will not be applied to your Z-copy!
Hope that helps,
Michael

Only one user at a time

I'm looking for help.
I have two user accounts on my iMac. Both have their own iTunes library file but these both reference to a shared store of music files (to avoid duplicates). I would now like to move this shared music to an external HDD attached to my TC.
My problem is this. If user 1 first accesses the external HDD then when user 2 tries to do so there is a little red icon on the folder and permission is denied. If I disconnect all users from the TC and then retry with user 2 the problem is reversed. It seems to me that only one user account is allowed to access a TC external HDD at a time. Is there any way around this?
In case anybody asks, my reason for moving the files is that I am hoping to buy a Sonos music system, which can read iTunes music from the TC as though it were an NAS, even if the computer is off.

I think you're being misled a bit by the interface: the checkbox labelled "Strict locking" doesn't just allow strict locking, it requires it (and thus disallows byte-range locking). That is, with strict locking enabled, any client that tries to lock any part of the file actually locks the entire file. Access normally depends on byte-range locking to allow different clients to share the database (as long as they aren't trying to modify the same part of it at the same time), but with strict locking the first client locks all others out.

Error in view "IBO_WDC_INBOX.V_DEFAULT": Only one MessageArea UI Element is allowed to be visible

Dear Team,
In the control center, when i launch from SAP backend or select work overview button in the web UI it prompts for the error as below;
The following error occurred in system XYZ : Error in view "IBO_WDC_INBOX.V_DEFAULT": Only one MessageArea UI Element is allowed to be visible
Kindly suggest and advice.
All the ACF's are activated as mentioned.
Best Regards,
Shashikumar BS

What is your SAP version, including EHP and SP levels? See if SAP note 1818992 is relevant for your system and if it is make sure it is applied.

I consider release 28 the last of the good releases. Am I the only one that feels this way or are there others?

Release 28 was the last version that allowed us to add toolbars, put icons on new and old toolbars and truly customizing the browsers for our use. Other things like separate the search window and the URL window of different toolbars to make the use faster.
Sooner or later, I know I will have to upgrade if this "dumbing down" continues, or try to find another browser but I have been on this browser almost since I left Netscape and started using Firefox many, many years ago.
Most I know hate Google, Chrome for its "clean" look, that is, removing options and hiding command icons so we have to hunt for them. But, it looks like the developers of FF used to work on IE or Chrome as now I can not tell much difference. What you can see is way TOO simple and hidden.
Am I alone in this feeling of FF going in the wrong direction? The other browsers have "dumbed" down theirs for the novice or people that use only email but not the serious users like the FF user.
IF I am the only one, then I will go away and try to keep up with these "dumbed down", clean, blank, versions.

This is a support forum, designed to provide one-on-one help with specific questions.
You certainly are not the only person who likes various aspects of the earlier user interface, as you can tell from the popularity of the Classic Theme Restorer extension. If you haven't already explored it, you can learn more about it in this article: [[How to make the new Firefox look like the old Firefox]].

HT4437 is there a way to connect my ipad with airplay to more than one airplay enabled speaker? at the moment it allows me to connect to only one?

is there a way to connect my ipad using airplay to more than one airplay enabled speaker? when i tap the airplay icon on my ipad i see the list of all the speakers in each room but i can only connect to one at a time. Itunes, on my laptop, allows me to connec to all of them at the same time but Music on my ipad allows me to choose only one speaker at a time. Can several be connected at the same time using Music on Ipad or iphone?

That's great, but not what we want to do. I've been looking at all the boards for a solution to this and, you are correct. There isn't one - at least not one native to iOS. What I think EricB2 would like, as well as many of us, is the ability to take any audio stream (pandora, tune-in radio, etc.) and stream directly to multiple airplay devices from our iPads and iPhones without having to use the computer. Just walk into the house from the car, hit a button on the iDevice and start listening to the same stream we were listening to in the car on all of our home speakers. I know, this is like science fiction. My own opinion is that it would cut into Apples lucrative iTunes business model and really isn't in their best interest, so I don't think it will be happening anytime soon. Bottom line is if you want to use your Apple devices for whole house streaming, you need a computer and music from iTunes($$). Otherwise it's $$ out of Apples pocket.

Is there a way to set firefox so it only allows access to only one website / (ip address).

Is there a way to set firefox so it only allows access to only one website / (ip address) and block traffic from everything else (the entire web) other than the one site I want to allow? The site I want to allow is a corporate web application that will only work in firefox. We as a business run a windows server and all client desktops run Internet Explorer with security setting controlled by group policy. We have already locked down the security setting in firefox so users can’t bypass the proxy server settings.

I have a proxy server set up (Symantec.cloud). Fire fox is “locked” so users would find it difficult to bypass it.
I have a file: '''local-settings.js '''
This is located in: C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox\defaults\pref
The content of this file is:
''pref("general.config.obscure_value", 0); // only needed if you do not want to obscure the content with ROT-13
pref("general.config.filename", "mozilla.cfg");''
I also have the file: called: '''mozilla.cfg'''
This is located: C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
The contents of this file is:
lockPref("network.proxy.type", 5);
All that is working fine, users can’t easily change the connection settings.
So all that is good and works…
What I would also like to do is set firefox so access is limited to 1 IP address and nothing else is allowed (the whole internet is blocked, except this one IP address).
You suggest using a PAC file - I was unsure how I would use a PAC file, (I have never written one) and do not understand how I would implement one? Please help.

When defining copy rules, only one source field allowed

Our users have requested the facility to allow them to copy pricing condition records when in in VK12 transaction. But when configuring the copy rules, we have come across the following problem:
When configuring copying rules for copying pricing condition records,
there is no possibility to use more than one source/target fields.
In our example, the condition table created for a certain pricing
access sequence contains keys such as Sales Organization, Sold-to Party
"and" Product Hierarchies level 1 to level 9 (e.g. PH1 - PH9) .
In the condition table definition, fields PH1 to PH9, although key
fields, are also defined as footer fields. This means that per sales
organization and sold-to party, we can create more than one condition
record based on different combinations of PH1 to PH9.
However when setting up copy rules for conditions in SPRO (SD -
Pricing Control - Copy Control for Conditions) to allow our users to copy the condition records, for a given Source /
Target table, the standard selection screen only allows us to define one Source / Target field.
In our case, this is not helpful. The configurator should be allowed
to select more than one source field (i.e. PH1 and PH2 and ..... PH9). At this moment,
we can only select as source field PH1 or PH2 or PH3., etc..
Steps for the Reconstruction:
- Run Spro.
- Select SD --> Pricing --> Pricing control --> Copy control for conditions -- > Copying rule for conditions
- Select 'New Entries'. Selection screen is displayed. The issue is that in this selection screen, the configurator is allowed to select only one source field. He should be allowed to select multiple fields.
Can you help us with this problem please?
Your help is much appreciated!
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:50 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:52 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:53 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:56 PM

Hi Ralph,
I don't like that methode. Importing the same transport 15 times, each time changing the source-system mapping and making sure, that source-system gets the changes seems to be a huge source of errors, which will be hard to find.
What do you think of the following idea to solve the issue a totally different way:
All transfer-rules directly connected to the source-systems are stripped of all Coding, so there is a plain 1 by 1 transformation including 0logsys.
The InfoSources attached all lead to one ODS-Object, which has the only purpose to collect the data from the source-system without any transformation. So some fields a filled by a system and other fields maybe not.
The coding specific for source-systems is moved to transfer- / update-rules from that ODS-Object to the original ODS-Objects / Cubes and the "collecting" ODS-Object is emptied after every loading process.
This will result in a single point of change. It will be quite a huge program (maybe in startroutine) but it's the one and only point, where changes and corrections have to be made.
Regards
Robert

Only one top level element is allowed in an XML document. Line 2, Position 2

I get this error when I try to run an xsql query with a where clause:
Only one top level element is allowed in an XML document. Line 2, Position 2
<font size='-1' face='monospace'>XSQL-005: XSQL page is not well-formed.</font><BR>
-^
Here is the xsql query I tried to use.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsql:query connection="xmlbook" xmlns:xsql="urn:oracle-xsql">
select * from companytable where companynumber < 1000;
</xsql:query>
null

You need to escape certain characters in order to make XML documents well formed. The problem in this case is the less than sign between companynumber and 1000. You should replace it with <
I recommend reading a good XML book - "Building Oracle XML Applications" by Steve Muench, for instance.
Brian

Only one EhP release is allowed aditionally:

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for