OO4O on 64bit Windows 2003 Server

Is it possible to install OO4O on 64bit Windows 2003 Server SP1?

We have an application that uses OO4O and I am also trying to create a new workstation image using Vista 64-bit and have found roadblocks. The setup instructions for the application have one install the Oracle 9i client, of which is not compatible with Vista or 64-bit OSes. So I decided to try the 10g client for Vista and 2008 64-bit. Got it installed, but when I try to install the application, it tells me it needs Oracle Objects for OLE. After much research, it seems that there is no version of OO4O that will work with 64-bit Vista. Is that true? If so, is Oracle working on OO4O for Windows 64-bit OSes or have they given up permanently? And finally, is there any non-supported workaround to get OO4O to install and run on 64-bit Vista?
Thanks in advance.

Similar Messages

Oracle 10g Universe Connectivity From 64bit Windows 2003 Server

Hi,
Have an existing BO XI 3.1 environment built on a 64 bit Windows 2003 server and
I'm having problems getting it to communicate with Oracle 10g universes. Works fine
with its SQL Server 2005 repository and SQL Server 2005 relational/olap universes, but
cant seem to get it to work with Oracle.
Universes work fine on the 32 bit development environment talking to the same Oracle
database, but when move them to 64 bit testing environment they all fail with
Oracle ora-12154 errors.
32 bit Oracle client is installed and can communicate fine with other products using ODBC
connections from the server - but BO refuses to communicate.
Any ideas other than reinstalling BO under 'Program Files' rather than 'Program Files (x86)'
as I've seen some references on the web about this possibly being a problem?
Thanks.

Hi,
Oracle 32 bit and 64 bit connectivity work fine from the server. The problem seems to
relate to bug 3807408 in Oracle 10g that cant handle parentheses in directory names.
So BO being installed in u2018C:\Program Files (x86)\Business Objectsu2019 causes it to get
rather annoyed.
SAP Note 1202730 does cover this, but our DBA's aren't too keen on installing the
suggested patch. I'm also not very keen on reinstalling BO in a different directory as
we've got working production sites that would have to be rebuilt.
So now investigating whether using the Oracle 11g client will resolve this.
MSDN forum topic http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/sqlintegrationservices/thread/ab662d63-6385-4f73-b27f-d526048f601f/ gives a pretty good overview of what people have been trying to resolve this.

Install R12 on windows 2003 server 64bit

Hi Experts,
I need to install Oracle Apps R12 on windows 2003 server 64Bit.
what are all the steps should be followed to install Apps R12 on win 2003 server 64bit,
Please help me to do this,
Thanks
Sundaravel.R

Oracle E-Business Suite R12 Installation on Windows 2003
http://onlineappsdba.com/index.php/2007/02/20/prepare-for-oracle-apps-r12-installation/
HTH
Aman....

Oracle 9i Installation on Windows 2003 Server 64bit - URGENT

Hi ,
I am installing oracle 9i on win 2003 server (64 bit) enterprise edition. After the installation whenever I try to run Database Configuration Assistant or Net configuration assistant nothing happens.
If i run DBCA on command line then it runs but not from the Start menu. Can anyone suggest the solution ? I tested it with oracle 9i (32 bit) and (64bit) versoins for win2003 server platform. But same results. Also tried the oracle 32 bit for XP on windows 2003 server but in vain.
It seems like there is PATH problem but i checked all the paths and they seem preety okay. I wonder why it runs from the command line when I recall dbca.bat file and not from the Oracle menu.
I would appreciate any remedy to this problem

I hate to be a wet blanket, but this forum is for feedback about the OTN site. The best place for your current thread is in the Database Installation:
Database Installation
Thanks!

CSA 5.1 windows 2003 server 64bit support

Dear Netpros,
Could anyone tell me CSA 5.1 support windows 2003 server 64 bit OS.
I am trying with this machine but not installing.
SWAMI

Currently CSA does not support 64-bit platforms. This is because Microsoft has included a feature called patchguard or something like it in those platforms in order not to allow to touch Kernel, yet this is the way CSA works.
Microsoft and Cisco still working on it. It's likely that CSA v6 will support 64-bit platforms but there's no release date yet.

Installing problem on Windows 2003 Server 64 bit

Dear All,
I'am trying to install XE onto a Windows 2003 Server 64 bit.. The installation process ends without any errors but the database itself seems not to start.
I tried several hints that have been mentioned here within the forum. But none of them worked. While experimenting I saw that there is not a single registry entry of Oracle within HKEY_LOCAL_MASCHINE\Software .
Is there a possiblity to set those needed registry entries manually? Is there a script for that purpose?
Thank you very much for your help!
Regards
Matthias

Hi,
thank you for your reply. As 32bit programs should run under Windows 64bit I thought the XE should run under 64bit, too.
The installation of XE itself seems to finish without any errors. But within the log files it can be read that the database has not started up due to a out of memory problem. This causes many log entries within all other logfiles as no database could be created.
The out of memory problem might be the same as within Advice on running XE on a small virtual Linux host ("Virtuozzo") because I am using a virtual windows 2003 server with "Virtuozzo", too.
At this time I am on discussing the issue with the provider. Maybe I will get a dedicated server with Windows Server 2003 64bit. Hopefully the XE could be installed on the 64bit Windows Server because 32bit dedicated servers are rare.
Best regards
Matthias

Oracle HTTP Server download bandwidth limited on Windows 2003 Server

Hi,
we have an ApEx application with the following configuration on the server:
OS: Windows 2003 Server 64Bit
DB: 10.2.0.3 64bit
HTTP Server: the one that comes on the companion CD of Oracle DB 10g 32 bit
and after the bandwidth in the datacenter where the server resides was increased, I discovered a problem related to the server download bandwidth. I found on Metalink a Note [568075.1 - HTTP Server File Download Speed Is Slow |https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=568075.1] , but unfortunately not a very clear resolution given the fact that we use Oracle DB SEOne, so options 1 & 2 will involve additional licenses costs.
I tried option 3 suggested in the note by using the HTTP Server that comes with 11g (I assume this is a supported configuration also from licenses point of view HTTP Server from 11g on top of Oracle DB 10g) and I got a boost in performance but the bandwidth is still 70% compared to the bandwidth I get when downloading from the IIS on the same server.
Has anyone went through this exercise and found a solution for fully using the server bandwidth without needing to go for option 4 in the note, using Linux :), as in our case this will involve again additional licenses and/or hardware costs as the HTTP Server that comes with the DB has to be installed on the machine where the DB is installed?
Thanks in advance,
Florin

Ooops ... things like this happen with Oracle Support, no answer?
Can you tell me anyway the SR number or the SR title so that I can write it in the SR I make? Like that maybe Oracle Support will work harder on the case, as there are more customers hitting the same problem.
Anyway in the meanwhile, I run some tests with the original Apache and this one works like a charm even in Windows 2003 Server. What remains now to be done is to use the Open Source Apache as proxy to the HTTP Server, as it looks like it handles much better the static content, it supports also mod_gzip or mod_deflate, but does not support mod_plsql :(. So I think the combination of the two: will do the work for me, but it is really a pity that I have to configure 2 web servers because the HTTP Server has flaws in it :(. Hopefully these will be fixed soon

Function sequence error. in 64bit Windows 2008 Server.

Hi All,
Pardon me if the posting is not in the correct group.
I am migrating my application from 32bit(Windows 2003 Server) to 64bit (Windows 2008 Server R2).
I am getting the following while trying to execute a SQL command
Encountered ODBC error -1: S1010, 0, [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Function sequence error .
Basically internal function call is SQLExecute() function call. This works perfectly for Windows 2003 Server 32bit. I tried the command execute at the background from the command prompt and it is working.
I checked the squence of call.We have two consecutive SQLBindParameter function call and then we call SQLExecute. Is this sequence incorrect in case of 64bit? I also checked the return code given by SQLExecute which is 99.
Any help or suggestion would be very much appreciated.
Thanks,
-R

Hi Teun,
Yes i have build the addon & installer with x86. I am using Interop.SAPbouiCOM.dll , Interop.SAPbouiCOM.dll, System.dll , System.XML.dll.
I have not specified the relative path in code as such but iam loading my forms Load batch action i don't know if it ok in this scenario or not.
Building the Solution/Project is Successful without any warning.
While debugging it on my server it gives the same error "Object Reference Not Set to an Instance of an Object".
Debug Out put last errors are as follows:
A first chance exception of type 'System.IndexOutOfRangeException' occurred in mscorlib.dll
'TAMPA800.exe': Loaded 'C:\Windows\SysWOW64\sxs.dll'
First-chance exception at 0x76afe124 in TAMPA800.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: EEMessageException at memory location 0x0036ecec..
A first chance exception of type 'System.IO.FileNotFoundException' occurred in TAMPA800.exe
A first chance exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' occurred in TAMPA800.exe
The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0x460) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0xdb8) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0xfdc) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0xfb4) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0xdc8) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0xe04) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The program '[3872] TAMPA800.exe: Managed' has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The program '[3872] TAMPA800.exe: Native' has exited with code 0 (0x0).
Regards
John

Oracle application 10.1.2.0.2 on 64bit windows 2003

hi all,
i have gone through the metalink certify column- it speaks that you can install BI and forms on windows 2003 0s 64bit with oracle application server 10.1.2.0.2 but without infrastructure.
Does that mean we will not be able to use OID and management repository which we are using for synchronization with the windows active directory. will i be able to use oracle discoverer???
will my forms requires some modification while going for 64-bit windows???? is there a separate 64bit oracle 10.1.2..0.2 application server software or the same that is used with 32 bit windows can work??will it solve my memory problem to use more than 4GB if i use
The same oracle AS that i have been using for 32 bit windows 2003 with the 64bit windows 2003 also .
Any suggestions for These queries
Thanks and Regards
Manish
[email protected]

Hi Milan;
I have configured Oracle Discoverer 10.1.2.0.2 upgraded its version using patch 5983622 on our Production server(227) that has forms and web on it.
Now we also have production server(228) that has forms and web on it and we want to configure the Oracle discoverer 10.1.2.0.2 on 228 server .
With same url that has been deployed on 227 server(ie:http://idfcstandby.idfc.com:7777/discoverer/plus)
I am little confused with your words production server(228) production server(227) but if you meant you have one discovered server and you want to use it wiht same link on both server than yes its possible. Wiht one disco installation you can use same link more than 1 server
Regard
Helios

Proble shutting down ASM instance on Windows 2003 server.

Hi,
Before booting the windows 2003 server, I am trying to shutdown the ASM instance and it is just siiting there without any response. This is a 10g database and a 2003 server.
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>set oracle_sid=+ASM
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>sqlplus " / as sysdba"
Copyright (c) 1982, 2006, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
SQL> shutdown immediate;
Thanks.

Thanks for your response. Yes I did stopped the database. I was having the same problem with the database ( as it was sitting there after I issued the shutdown immediate ). Finally I had to do shutdown abort, start up in restrict mode and do a shutdown again to stop the database gracefully

(Very Ergent)R12 on windows 2003 server with itanium processor...

Hi,
Is it possible.
Processor : Itanium 2(64bit)
OS : Windows 2003 server for itanium (don't know 32/64bit)
http://www.microsoft.com/servers/64bit/itanium/overview.mspx
ERP: R12 for windows(32bit)
Is it possible with these combination
Thanks & Regards,
Shankar

Duplicate thread (please post only once):
Is it possible?
Re: Is it possible?

How to Install 64-bit "Generic / Text Only" print driver on a 32-bit Windows 2003 Server?

Hi All,
In a nutshell, I need to Install the 64-bit Generic / Text Only print driver on a 32-bit Windows 2003 Server’s “Generic / Text Only 32-bit print queue.
The problem is that there is no Driver-Disk to get the drivers. I’ve been able to isolate 14 files related to the 64 bit drivers from a Windows 7 x64 computer and copy them to a temp folder on the Windows 2003 x32 server. When I try to add the 64 bit driver
to the Windows 2003 x32 server, it wants a *.inf file, which I don’t have and can’t find.
Because Microsoft will no longer support Windows XP, my client is replacing all of their Point-of-Sale Windows XP x32 systems with Windows 7 x64. They use Terminal Services (Remote Desktop) to connect to a Windows 2003 x32 server to use the POS system. The
POS software redirects LPT1 back to the local Generic / Text Only printer. This works great for XP x32.
When we use the Terminal Services POS software on the new Windows 7 x64 system, none of the labels print out because it’s redirected in 32-bit back to the local Windows 7 x64 Generic / Text Only 64-bit printer.
This will be a huge issue for me if I can’t get this to work.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions and help! -Rob

those may be helpful...
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a129f49a-0216-41f0-b190-3efb46fbb8ac/generic-text-only-driver-on-windows-2008-server-r2?forum=winserverprint
http://blogs.technet.com/b/yongrhee/archive/2009/09/14/how-to-add-64-bit-print-drivers-on-32-bit-windows-server-2003-or-windows-server-2008-print-server.aspx
Best,
Howtodo

Space Problem in G: - after NW2004s SR1 installation on Windows 2003 server

HI Friends,
I have installed NW2004s SR1 on Windows 2003 server with Oracle 10g database successfully. My server has sufficient harddisk space as follows.
C: 9.6GB
G: 24GB
H:64GB & I: 73GB.
RAM is 6GB
While installing NW2004s i have defined a paging size on C: 400MB-1600MB and
i have set the option as System Manageble on other drives G, H& I drives. I did not get any Swap space problem while installing.
During installation I have chosen G: drive to store MirrorlogA, MirrorlogB, Oraarch, OriglogA, OriglogB folders of Oracle for redolog archives,.Total size of all these folders is 17.4 GB
G: drive has one more folder Program files which is of 155KB and no other files exist in it.
But My system says that I am running out of Space on G: drive and free space available now is only 44MB.
My question is where has the rest 5GB of space gone? Is it consumed as a part of Paging file which i have set on this drive as System manageble??
I have set the same option on other drives too i..e H & I. But i am not facing any space issues for these drives.
What could be going wrong?? Please suggest me how to correct this
Thanks
mv_d

898118 wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to face some problem to install oracle 10g database on windows 2003 server with service pack 2. Once I start to installation it give me an error "Error in writing to directory 'c:\documents and settings\administrator\local settings\temp\orainstall2004xxx'. Please ensure that this directory is writable and has at least 45MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue"
I double-insured that there is enough disk-space and I am also in the Administrators-Group.
Please guide me for the above problem although I have done oracle 9i database installation with the same configuration.
Regards
Muhammad ShoaibOracle really doesn't like to be installed into directories with spaces in their names.

Netweaver 2004S installation on Windows 2003 server : Oracle 10g Problem

Hi Friends,
I am installing the SAP Netweaver 2004s on a server which has Windows 2003 server Operating system on it.
It has got 6GB RAM and has, 5gb of free space in C drive, H: drive has 70 gb and I: drive has 50 GB of free space in it.
I am running Pre_requiste checker tool to check my hardware & software requirements in order to go ahead with installation, as a part of SAPInst.exe execution.
The results of Prerequisite checker tool are satisfied except for one " SWAP SPACE VALUES"
I am getting the message as follows
"The Minimum SWAP SPACE values required is 10994MB and currently you have 5993MB"
How to increase this SWAP space value? Please let me know the procedure.
Currently my server has a paging file details as below : Min size : 2MB & Max size : 9214MB allocated on C: drive. No other drive has paging file allocation.
What effect will I have if i proceed without meeting this requirement??
Suitable answers will be rewarded.
Thanks
Diwakar

OPen windows explorer and right click my computer
Select Properties
Click Advanced Tab
Click Settings (performance)
Select Advanced Tab
In virtual memory - click change.
Increase swap space/page file here.

Problem Oracle 10g database Installation on Windows 2003 Server

Hi All,
I am trying to face some problem to install oracle 10g database on windows 2003 server with service pack 2. Once I start to installation it give me an error "Error in writing to directory 'c:\documents and settings\administrator\local settings\temp\orainstall2004xxx'. Please ensure that this directory is writable and has at least 45MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue"
I double-insured that there is enough disk-space and I am also in the Administrators-Group.
Please guide me for the above problem although I have done oracle 9i database installation with the same configuration.
Regards
Muhammad Shoaib

898118 wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to face some problem to install oracle 10g database on windows 2003 server with service pack 2. Once I start to installation it give me an error "Error in writing to directory 'c:\documents and settings\administrator\local settings\temp\orainstall2004xxx'. Please ensure that this directory is writable and has at least 45MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue"
I double-insured that there is enough disk-space and I am also in the Administrators-Group.
Please guide me for the above problem although I have done oracle 9i database installation with the same configuration.
Regards
Muhammad ShoaibOracle really doesn't like to be installed into directories with spaces in their names.

OO4O on 64bit Windows 2003 Server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for