Open Item & budget Carryforward.

Dear All!
we are little bit confused regarding the closing procedure of  Funds Managment ( BCS).
I'm writing the following scenerio that may I able to understant every one!
I entered the Budget $100 and Released $ 40. When I execute the transaction FMRP_RW_BUDGET for budget overview, system display the following Information:
Current Budget : 100 , original budget : 100 and by executing the FMRP_RW_BUDCON transaction. system display the following information
Consulabale budget: 40 Consumed Budget: 0 Avilabale Budget : 40 and Current Budget: 100.
Now I created the purchase order : 30, then system displaying the information by exeuting FMRP_RW_BUDCON  the cosumed budget 30  and available budget : 10
and current budget : 100
I carryforward the  open item (purchase order) to next year, system forward the open item & display the following information in next year by executing the above reports
Transaction: FMRP_RW_BUDGET
Current Budget : 30 Orginal : 0
when I carryforward the residual budget, system carry forward the $ 70 to next year and the amount $100 is still available for release & consumabale, also the current budget become again 100 by forwarding the budget.
please expalin what the system is doing is ut correct? why all the amount still available for consumable?
please tell me following are the correct sequance of closing.
   1- Open Item
   2- budget ( with key figure YE_RESIDUAL)
further, in what cases the transaction FMMC-close open item is being used?
Thanks

Hi MSiddique,
We are a governmental entity. We use FMMC to close out prior year obligations (encumbrances - i.e. purchase orders, purchase requisitions) that will not get carried forward into the next fiscal year.
For the encumbrances that remain open and will get carried forward to the next fiscal year, we use FMJ2.
So for instance if we have 100 original and 100 current in starting out in FY06, and we have an existing purchase order for 20 and 35 was already expended (i.e. invoiced and paid), the consumed would be 55 and the available would be 45. At the beginning of FY07, only the existing encumbrances that we didn't close using FMMC will be carried forward along with the related budget of 20 using FMJ2. If 45 wasn't used it would not get carried forward (unless it involves a multi year capital project)
The FY06 Budget would look like this
Original 100
Current 100
Encumbered 20
Expended 35
Consumed 55
Available 45
After the carry forward to FY07 would look like this
Original 130 (new approved budget for the new year-not related to FY06)
Carryforward 20
Current 150
Encumbered 20
Expended 0
Consumed 20
Available 130
We had to create custom reports instead of using the standard reports.
Our sequence of closing is as follows...
All requisitions not converted to a P.O. gets closed - FMMC
All P.O.s identified not to roll forward gets closed - FMMC
All remaining P.O.s are carried forward FMJ2
FMJ2 rolls forward the remaining P.O.s as well as creates a budget document for the new fiscal year (but we keep it seperate from the original by using a carryforward column. I hope this helps.

Similar Messages

  • Carry forward of Open Items - FMJ2

    Hi,
    We are using BCS in EHP 7.0. i am trying to carry forward the open items with FMJ2 and Availability control is "Update without check". When i execute the transaction, system is carryforwarding to next year without any errors.
    How ever, if i see the availability report FMAVCR01  for 2015-
    Budget for 2015 is 0 - Consumable budget - 0, Consumed Budget is 20000$ and available amount is -20000$.
    Where if i add the budget for 2015 of 50000$, then consumable budget - 50000, Consumed is 20000 and available amount is 30000$. it is consuming from current year.
    Please help me on this.
    Regards
    Sam

    Hi Eli,
    Thanks for your reply
    When i carry forward the open item, and runs the FMAVCR01 report, it is deducting last year open items budget from current year. As i stated above, Consumable amount is 0 and consumed amount is 20000$ and available amount is -20000$.
    Is System should carry forward the consumed budget along with consumable budget?
    Regards
    Sam

  • Difference between vendor open items and vendor balance

    Hi all,
    I have the following problem: When I display open items for a vendor with a special general ledger code, it happens that for some vendors, the total of these open items do not equal the vendor balance concerning this special GL code.
    Or in other words, the sum of BSIK and BSAK entries are not equal to the totals in table LFC3.
    I identified SAP standard program RFEWA003, that gives me exactly these differences, but how can I correct the entry in LFC3?
    The difference only occurs in the current fiscal year and is in the carryforward amount of LFC3. I checked the totals of debits and credits for the current year which are 100% correct.
    Our last fiscal year was shortened (only 11 months). Could this be the reason?
    How to correct LFC3 entries? Any correction program existing that is not related to Euro conversion?
    Thanks for your appreciated help,
    andie.m
    Edited by: andie.m on Jul 2, 2009 2:49 PM

    Hi Michael,
    Thanks for your answer, but I tried already the carry forward. It just says there is nothing to be treated.
    I thought there might be a special carry forward transaction for special general ledger accounts, but it does not seem.
    Any other ideas?
    Thanks for your help.
    Andreas

  • Deletion of parked invoices after carry forward of open items in FM

    Hi,
    We have Funds management activated in our client.The MIRO invoices are parked for the year 2008.We follow calendar year.Open item are carried forward to 2009 without posting/deleting  the parked invoices.We are now unable to delete the parked invoices. We get the following error message while trying to delete the invoice:
    Posting in fis. yr 2008 is not possible; in FM open doc. 5000005928 in fis. yr 2009
    Message no. FMCF102
    Diagnosis
    It is not possible to change document 5000005928 in fiscal year 2008 because the document was updated as open commitment in fiscal year 2009 in Funds Management.
    System Response
    The posting is not carried out.
    Procedure
    To change the document
    If the fiscal year 2008 is later than 2009:
    Carry document 5000005928 forward to fiscal year 2008 using program Closing Operations: Carryforward of Open Items (RFFMCCF1).
    If fiscal year 2008 is earlier than 2009 and document 5000005928 was carried forward already:
    Reset the commitment carryforward using program Closing Operations: Reset Carryforward of Open Items (RFFMCCFR)
    Then you can make the change to document 5000005928.
    I tried to undo Carry forward using FMJ3,but I get a message "There are no items to be reversed"
    Please guide me,
    Thanks in advance
    Latha

    Hi,
    Please, check note 1285456. The CF of parked invoices was apparently performed with discrepancies in the tables.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Budget carryforward

    Hi all,
    I need to manage a Program structure with Internal Order, for actual and Budget values (Investment management).
    I have created my Program structure with Internal Order.
    Then I have distrbuted Budget over Internal Order (IM52 - Edit ) and done some activities over Internal Ordes (Purchase Orders,...).
    At the end of the year I have some remaining budget so I want to carryforward it to next year.
    Steps I do are:
    1- IM27 - Open New Approval Year
    2- IMCAOV - Budget Carryforward.
    After running this last, the system tells that everything is Ok, but if I query a report (ex.: S_ALR_87012824 - Budget Availability in Program ), I don't see the new values on the following year.
    Ex.:
    2009: 100 (Actual 50)
    2010: 100.
    After budget carryforward I would expect to have:
    2009: 0
    2010: 150.
    But nothing is changing in terms of values.
    Can anyone help me?
    Thank you
    Edited by: Caforio Claudio on Mar 17, 2009 3:37 PM

    Hi Caforio Claudio,
    Pls check if you have (If the Investment Measure is Internal Order)
    You performed the commitment carryforward for measures belonging to the investment program - KOCF
    You performed the budget carryforward for measures belonging to the investment program - KOCO
    which are pre-requisites for Budget Carryforward for Investment Programs...
    Pls check and revert back...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Close an opened item out of the Open Time Intervals

    Hello everybody,
    I was told that there is a link between "open time intervals" (that you can parameter with Tcode FMIR) and the "closing operation" using Tcode FMMC.
    Can someone tell me if it is normal to be able to close an opened items even if this item is not in an open time interval ?
    if yes, how can I restrict this closing operation only to open time intervals ?
    In advance, thank you for your answers.
    Best regards,
    Marc Chevilliet

    Hi Eli,
    My problem is that my client is able to close open items (old ones) whereas  there is no open interval for the date of those items. You are telling me that it is normal for them to be able to close it.
    Now my question is : How can I forbid this action ? Because they don't want to be allowed to do an action on an item from closed budget (understandable ).
    Thank you
    "I'm bit surprised by your statement that you have open commitments which are not treated. What kind of commitments are there? Is it EMFs? " -> About that, I think I didn't express myself clearly, that seems to be a misunderstanding.

  • Open Item and Line Items are not matching

    Hi Gurus,
    I ran the EFT for vendor #1600109 for payment on 10/18/07.  If I run the vendor open items report (ZFI019) for today, it shows the balance net of the EFT that is $203,466 ( $263869 - EFT Value is $60,403). 
    When I ran the vendor line items display (FBL1N), it shows all the invoices including the invoices paid on the Oct 18 EFT $263,869 which is (2034,66+60,403). 
    User wants the open item report should tally the line item display.
    I will assign good points.
    Thanks for your help
    Prashanth

    Hi Gurus,
    EFT is working fine. But the Vendor Open item Report (Custom Report) and Vendor line item report (FBL1N) is different.
    We are looking a balance for a vendor as on 15th where the balances are not matching between the reports but if i run FBL1N on 18th the balances are matching.
    Clearning date is 18th
    Posting Date is 15th.
    Thanks
    Prashanth

  • Vendor's same open item selected for payment twice through APP run F110

    Hi,
    In F110 run, specified vendor  number and payment method(Bank Transfer), executed payment run.
    After, say 5 minutes interval again executed F110 for all vendors and except for the above mentioned payment method.
    In the first case, payment document generated, posted and cleared the Vendor open items. Here, the Payment method is B.
    In the second time also, the same open items are selected in the payment run and the payment method D(Cheque payment).
    Payment document generated and is not posted but cheque is generated for the same amount.
    How could it happened?

    Hi,
    In F110 run, specified vendor  number and payment method(Bank Transfer), executed payment run.
    After, say 5 minutes interval again executed F110 for all vendors and except for the above mentioned payment method.
    In the first case, payment document generated, posted and cleared the Vendor open items. Here, the Payment method is B.
    In the second time also, the same open items are selected in the payment run and the payment method D(Cheque payment).
    Payment document generated and is not posted but cheque is generated for the same amount.
    How could it happened?

  • Unable to Clear Vendor open items in F.13

    Hi All,
    We have few vendor codes, where all are having some normal open items as well as Spl GL open items and net balance is 0.
    When we do clearing with F-44, No issues at all
    But when we try to clear them through F.13, system is grouping normal open items and Spl GL transactions separately.
    If i choose  Shortlist (Statistics) in selection screen, then only atleast i will be able to see normal line items in one group and spl gl items in another group.
    If i choose, Detailed List with Error Log, i am not able to see anything related to any kind of line items.
    So then, i red the documentation of the program SAPF124, in that it says Down payments can only be cleared if down payment clearing for the same amount has been posted.
    As we all know that, each spl GL transaction can be cleared against one normal transaction in F-54. But in our case, we never do that practice, and always want to clear spl GL transactions along with normal transactions.
    My question is that, Is it mandatory to clear them in F-54 before doing F.13?
    As i know, there is an check box option for selecting spl GL transactions in F.13....in this case why should i clear prior to F.13?
    Please advise...
    Regards,
    Srinu

    Hi Gaurav,
    Thanks for your inputs.
    I agree with you, but my intention is to know, whether any possibility (change of internal selection criterion for recon account)
    to clear them automatically in F.13 without doing F-54 only.
    Anyhow i have found two other alternative solutions for the same.
    1) Batch input recording for F-44 in LSMW.
    2) Using worklist instead of vendor code in F-44 to clear all items at one go.
    As our business won't follow clearing with F-54, so this requirement may come often. 
    But only my concern is, they need to identify these cases separately and spend more time to add each vendor code to that worklist, since they are not able to add a range of vendor codes directly. As it allows only single values.
    So, is there any other way, which we can suggest them to add 10000+ vendor codes to the same worklist, since we can add 12 codes at one go and repeating the same will take time
    Regards,
    Srinu

  • Possible to clear vendor open item against already posted payment document?

    Hi
    Can you advise if it is possible to clear an open item against already posted payment/clearing doc? Here is the background to the scenario:
    An invoice was posted with transaction FB60. This was subsequently picked up in the payment run F110 and cleared by payment document number 200005678. The item went to the bank on the paymnet file and was paid out to the vendor. The transaction reference, which appeared on the incoming bank statemnet was the payment document number 200005678.
    Subsequently it was discovered that the original invoice should have been posted with reference to a PO using MIRO. The requirement now is to reverse the paymnet documnet 200005678 in SAP, then reverse the document that was posted using FB60. After this the invoice will be posted using MIRO. This will create an open item on the vendor account.
    This item will not be piad out again. Therefore the requirement is to try clear that open item against the previously posted payment document 200005678.
    Is there any way to clear this vendor open item against the originally posted payment document 200005678?? Or any other advice on how this scenario can be handled in SAP?
    Thank for your help.
    Mike

    Hi,
    I tried that option in our test system. I ran FBRA and entered Paymnet Documnet Number (+Clearing Doc Number), Company Code, Fiscal Year.
    Then chose menu option Clearing -> Reset Cleared Items.
    The system pops up a window asking for a reversal reason and reversal date.  I use 01 and posting date of today.
    The system now posts another cleared document. That document places the invoice as an open item on the vendor account. It does not place the Payment Document as an open item on the account.
    When I go to F-44 only the open vendor invoice is showing there. There is no open paymnet document.
    Is there perhaps some configuration setting that stops the placement of the paymnet document as an open item when reset?
    Thanks for your help again.

  • URGENT---Automatic payment run-Vendor open item clearing

    When I run the payment program, it ran without any error, however, the vendor account was not cleared. The balance in GL and Vendor account remains the original amounts. And the Vendor line items which were supposed to be cleared thru F110, are now showing as Open items.
    please give me the TCODES to look in.
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance
    Sharath

    Dear Sharath,
    To check whether your payment run has actually generated any payment document or not, please follow the following steps:-
    (1) Go to transaction SE16/ SE16N and table REGUH, give the "payment run ID", "run date" and "Proposal Indicator as blank".
         It should show the payment document.
    (2) If (1) above show payment document, then go to table REGUP and check the invoices paid.
       If invoices are there in REGUP, then there might be some issue in the payment document updation in the system which you can check via transaction SM12. (For this just check in table REGUV, whether payment documents created and posted are equal or not for the payment run.)
    (3) if (1) do not show any payment document, that means payment run has not made any payment.
        In this case, you create a new payment run and in the parameters select the error logs display also and in free selection give the document number you are expecting to be paid off by the payment run. This might help you to know the reason of non payment by cheking the proposal log/ payment run log.
    I hope that this should assist you
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Vendor Open items Authorisation

    Hi Peers!
    Is there any report were i can authorise the payments to which vendor and which invoice i can pay today like that.
    Ex: Say my higher authority wants to select the open items vendor wise to pay the due. so that i will check that invoices and pay through outgoing payment.
    Pls reply soon, Its urgent
    Thanks
    Murali

    Hi
    There are so many age wise analysis reports are there for analysing the customers or vendors open items. out of those, F.41 for vendor open items there you can find all the relevant data including business area level also satisfied because in some cases higher management wants the particular business area wise required for analysis. similarly f.21 for customers.
    I hope it will be suffice your requirement.
    Regads
    madhav

  • Reset Cleared Documents and Vendor Open Items Report FBL1N

    Hi all,
    I have following scenario:
    - In last month, we had 2 documents (invoice and payment) cleared against each other. We created open items report as well as open items correspondence sent to Vendor. Obviously, the docs were not included in report.
    - In this month, we have reset and reverse clearing document of the documents. We create report again with the open key date as in last month. It should not include the 2 docs but it did with whichever key date we chose.
    Is there any setting that open item report doesn't include cleared item at the key date when we run report for previous month?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Dau

    Hi Dau,
    If i understand you correctly then you posted and paid invoice in Jan 2012 and generated the open line item report for Jan which correctly did not include this cleared invoice.
    Now in Feb 2012 you reset and reversed this payment document.
    The issue is when you execute the report FBL1N again then you get the open line item for this invoice correct. Please confirm what is the open item key date that you are using here for generating this report
    If you keep it 31.01.2012 then definetly this invoice should not appear in the report but if you keep that 29.12.2012 then this line item would for sure appear.
    The importance of key date is to limit the report to certain date. The system selects all items posted up to and including the specified key date and open for this period.
    so I think your issue is with the key date.
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Prasad

  • Vendor open items wise ALV Grid Display (FBL1N) report to Excel Sheet

    Hi All,
    I need vendor wise open items and cleared items in ALV Grid format in excel sheet.
    I'm Trying that in T Code FBL1N, After the execution. I had select ALV Grid format like this From the menu bar->Settings-> Switch list.
    After that i get ALV  Grid format, Then i'm doing export the data to excel sheet. like this From the Menu bar->List->Export->Spread sheet.
    That time i'm getting Error Message no. 0K064, Filter criteria, sorting, totals and subtotals are not taken into account.
    I want vendor wise sorting totals and subtotals,
    How can i over come this Error please let me now.
    Thanks,
    Amar

    Hi Amar,
    Please check the KBA 2083705.
    https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1odSZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3230383337303526
    Regards,
    Monika

  • Deleted Items Appearing on the FBL3n Report for Open Items

    Hi All
    We just went live and I am facing a huge issue;
    I deleted many migration entries from loads of GL Accounts for multiple Co Codes, but on the FBL3n report, whenI execute with the option of 'Open Items' only, I  still see the deleted items with a green check sitting there.
    How can i get those from being visible?
    Thanks for the support
    RS

    Hi:
                This is standard behavior. Your GL accounts are managed on line item basis hence despite of the fact you reversed the entries they will continue to be shown in open item selection criteria which in fact are not open items. It makes no sense to see a GL account in FBL3N on open item date since this account has been configured on the basis on line item management and i will continue to be shown as line item with green sign . Execute report FBL3N with open item or with all item (with date you give in open item) you will see the same figures and same line items. However you can exclude the reversed entries by fetching reversed with (BKPF-STBLG) field from menu ..settings...special fields and hence excluding the entries having this filed update.
    I hope this will solve your issue.
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for