Open TRs not getting deleted after TECO production order

Hi,
We're having an issue.  We're using WMPP interface to supply the production line for the production orders.  The auto TRs are generated when the production orders are released. 
After TECO the production orders, the open TRs are not getting deleted automatically.
Could anyone know if these TRs get deleted automatically when we do the TECO production order?
If yes, do we have any restriction or condition based on this, the TRs get deleted?
Please explain.
Thank you.
with regards,
Muthu.

Hi Abhijit,
Thank you for your reply.  It does not help me.
The auto TR creation is happening now as required.  No issue on this.
When you do the TECO, it also cancels the TRs.  I tested this also. 
There're some scenario this open TRs cancellation is not happening.  I do not know when these open TRs are not cancelled.  If you know answer for this, please let me know.
Thank you for your help and time.
with regards,
Muthu.

Similar Messages

  • Production Reporting out put not getting deleted after 30mins what we set.

    Hi,
    This issue regarding Production Reporting. In the workspace the report output not getting deleted after 30minutes (while publishing the report settings were like delete after 30 mins). Any suggestions please .....
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Hi Deepak,
    Please chek the field / value which u have changed is relavant to  printouts of the change.
    You can check  with following path
    SPRO> MM > Purchasing > Message > Fields Relevant to Printouts of Changes.
    Confirm tick is provided for PO ( P)
    Vivek

  • The Subsequent Requirm not getting deleted after deleting the Item from P.O

    Hi all
    The Subsequent Requirment for the Material is not getting  cancelled even after deleting the Item from the Purchase Order  and we have even deleted the Requirment for the Top level material . If we click on the Pegging requirment for the Subsequent requirment the system is telling that no Pegging Requirment exists but it is not getting deleted. Waiting for the feed backs

    Kumar,
    Run MRP for the Materials involed and let us know if there are any exception messages.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Any one has problem with notes getting deleted after a week ?

    After upgrade to iOs 7, my new notes that I wrote on icloud or email are deleted after a week. I  have to take note again and again, first i did not notice because i thought i was accidently deleted, but then a week later i lost the new notes again. All old notes are ok, it just happen to new notes after iOs 7. Pls help

    try SUS and reinstall it again

  • Stock not getting updated after confirmation of order

    dear all
    In our scenario x is final product.x1( semifinished),x2(spare) are dependent materials for final product. x1 has bom r1 and r2 (raw materials).I put all x1,x2,r1,r2 stock available in storage.
    To get final product , only final assy of above materials by labour.PIR (md61) created for x and planning run.After planning run, planned order generated for x and converted in to production order and released.
    My requirement is on confirmation of production order, backflushing of dependent materials as per bom should be done.
    On confirmation of order in co15,saved.But, stock is not getting updated.what might be the reason? please give me some solution

    Hi
    1.Set the Back Flush Indicator in your Material Master for the components. ( You can do this in Work center and Production Order too )
    2. You can also set the flag for the field " All Components" in Order Confirmation Parameters (OPK4).
    3. If you want to post the Fert also at the time of confirmation use the Control Key which has " Auto GR"  enabled.
    While confirming the Order press the Button "Goods Movement" to ensure that the components are present there for the movement.
    Regards
    Krishna
    Regards
    Krishna

  • Planning for requirement after TECO production order

    Hi, I would like to understand how do I plan the remainder of an independent requirement if the production order sourcing it is TECOed.
    The scenario I'm proposing is the following:
    - There's an independent requirement for a given quantity (e.g. 100 tons) and there's an associated production order to fulfill it. Production has already started and goods receipts have been made for partial quantity (e.g. 50 tons)
    - The production order is TECOed but I still need to re-plan for the remaining 50 tons
    how does the fact that part of the independent requirement has been  partially fulfilled impacts my re-plan? how does the system knows that I have to plan for 50 and not the original 100?
    Many thanks,
    Diego

    Diego, assuming that you are working with a make to stock strategy (i.e. delivering from anonimous stock), after GR of 50 Tons and TECOing the production order, there is a negative balance between IndReq(-100) and stock (50). So, the MRP will create a new planned order for covering the demand.
    If a delivery is made from the stock, then the sales order will reduce both IndReq and stock and the balance still remains.
    Hope this help you...
    Regards

  • Not getting Material Costs in Production Order - MTO Scenario

    Hi,,
    When we are execting MTO Scenario, We are not getting Material costs in Cost analysis of Production Order (Transaction Code CO03).
    We have executed cost estiamte. but we are not gettig the material cost.we are getting only Activity price of Labour Hours.
    The problem is -
    1. we have created Sales order
    2. we have Run MRP & Planned order changed as production order
    3. But in this production order Costing Relevancy check box was not activated automatically. it is in gray mode and not able change this.
    4. Is the problem with SD configuration? Kindly help me in fix this issue.
    Note  - if we create production order directly - it is showing the Material cost. But only in MTO scenariod it is not giving the material cost.
    Kindly help me how to fix this issue.
    Thanks
    Kishore
    Edited by: Emergys Corp on Nov 5, 2009 7:02 AM

    In Requirement class (SD Configuration - OVZH)- we have to give valuation & Costing Sheet assignment.
    Thanks
    Kishore

  • Iam not getting the document in production order

    HI,
    Iam created a document (cad drawing)in CV01N and this document is assigned to BOM item category D.
    created production order  and released .here iam not getting the document overview in production order heade details.
    Any setting for document?give me solution

    Hi Naresh,
    You can view the dms documents at purchase order item level not in header. Hope this will resolve the query.
    Regards,
    Ravindra

  • Overhead is not getting updated in the production order

    Hi all,
    I am running actual overhead calculation with KGI2.
    But the overheads are not getting updated in the order.
    Order contains relevant overhead key also.
    What could be the possible causes?
    SmanS

    Arun/ Suleman,
    Thank you for your reply.
    I have maintained the % in the costing sheet against the 'Overhead rate' but I didn't get the secondary cost element.
    Request you to elaborate it further & explain me how to maintain the same.
    Also I will be thankful to you, if you could explain me the exact process of loading the overhead on the order i.e. how it loads the overhead form the cost center to order? What happens to the total cost which was lying on the cost center etc, in details.
    Mean while I had maintained the required values in costing sheet in KZS2.
    Maintained the % against material overhead rate as well as manufacturing overhead rate.
    Maintained the credit values for the overhead rate.
    Maintained the calculation base values also.
    Now while overhead calculation with KGI2, I am getting two errors as follows,
    1. S:K5:162 E02 20090831
    2. Error CREDIT_SEGMENTS_ADD COIOB NOT FOUND for object
    I can not figure out the reason.
    SmanS
    Edited by: SAP PP Consultant on Aug 10, 2009 6:47 AM

  • File is not getting deleted in File-RFC-File without BPM

    Hi,
    I'm working on File-RFC-File scenario without BPM. Everything is working fine except file is not getting deleted after the process. I'm passing xml file here and in return it will give the xml success/error message from RFC.
    For the sender CC, I'm passing the following parameters,
    Transsport protocol: File system
    Message protocol: File
    QoS: BE
    Poll Interval: 30 sec
    Mode: Delete
    File type: Binay
    Please let me know if I missed anything while passing the values.
    Thanks,
    Swamy
    Edited by: Swamy Mothe on Jun 15, 2009 8:52 AM

    Hi
    Then , is Sender and receiver File Adapter is using same folder )
    Just a question.
    But having all permisions and above config would delete the file
    can u see the status of u r File Adapter in RWB.? Is it in green?
    rgds
    srini

  • Can not get email after updating to 8.1.1! Deleted account and now cannot add as will not verify due to Apple something timeout messages? Any one else having problems?

    Can not get email after updating to 8.1.1! Deleted account and now cannot add as will not verify due to Apple something timeout messages? Any one else having problems?

    Hi tania184,
    Have you contacted your email provider to make sure there are no problems on their end? If they say their email servers are working properly, check the outgoing and incoming mail servers entries on your iPhone to make sure both are entered correctly. Enter the outgoing mail server even if the account setup indicates that is optional.

  • REM tick not getting deleted for Part no

    Dear All ,
    we have one material which had Procurement type " E " ( In-house SFG ) , But now the Part is totally Procured from vendor .
    So the Procurement type is changed to " F " .   So we need to do the Material Master Correction .
    If we Try to delete REM tick from Material Master , Following Message is seen >>>>>>
    Production versions exist for which repetitive manufacturing is allowed
    Message no. M3636
    If Try to delete the REM tick from Production Version , Following Message is seen >>>>>
    Production version 1 or repetitive mfg indicator cannot be deleted
    Message no. KOSA012
    Even the Production Version is not getting deleted .  Following Message is seen >>>>>
    Production version 1 or repetitive mfg indicator cannot be deleted
    How to handle the above issue ?   Please guide . Thanx in advance

    Dear Vasu,
    check after performing these activities,
    Deleting the Production Version
    Use
    The production version contains the technical information on how a material can be manufactured. If this technical method has become outdated, you can delete the production version.
    Prerequisites
    1.You must settle the product cost collector you created for the production version.
    2.No more planned orders exist in the system which are assigned to this production version.
    3.If you work with reporting points in make-to-stock REM, no more work in process (WIP) exists on the production line in question. That is, work in process must be closed in the period-end closing in Cost Object Controlling.
    4.If an inspection lot exists, you must already have made the usage decision for the inspection lot.
    5.For the period in which the last reporting point backflush was carried out and for all previous periods in which the run schedule header or the production version is valid.
    6.the cutoff period is set for the WIP calculation
    7.the cutoff period is set for the variance calculation (operation KVAR)
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Email delete on computer (Exchange) not getting deleted on iPhone 5s

    Using a Macbook Pro w/ Retina Display and OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), when I delete or move an email on the computer it's not getting deleted or moved on the iPhone 5s (IOS 7). I upgraded to iPhone 5s yesterday from iPhone 4 (IOS 6). (The mail was working properly on the old phone.) I looked for, but didn't find anything in "Settings" to fix the problem.
    Any help is appreciated.

    Yeah, my boss has a similar problem.
    When he deletes email on his iPhone it re-appears after a couple of seconds. That is the iPhone is not really deleting email from the Exchange Server.
    Here's the rub. We just got him a new iMAC and he's running Fusion so that he can get to his Outlook "Notes", which Entourage doesn't support.
    So...he has Entourage open on the iMAC and Outlook open in Fusion.
    If Entourage is closed down and he deletes email from the iPhone, it IS deleted from Outlook/Exchange and doesn't reappear.
    However, if Entourage is OPEN, regardless of whether Outlook is open or not, the mail is NOT deleted from Entourage, causing it to reappear on the iPhone.
    Obviously the solution is not to use Entourage so I guess that's what we'll have to do until we can do a complete conversion to Apple and use Apple Mail on OSX. Alternatively I'm exploring using Google mail instead of Exchange.
    I'm afraid there isn't a good solution to this problem?

  • Order category BF not getting deleted in APO

    Hi Experts,
    I have a situation where the material is already deleted in ECC (hence no longer existing), but the product is existing in APO and we need to delete this in APO. To do this, we need to delete the dependent orders for that product/location first and then other dependencies.
    There are few orders for the prod/loc as confirmed purchase orders (ord cat BF). These orders are now PP/DS orders with status as PP firmed, output firmed and date fixed.
    I have tried the two programs- /sapapo/rlcdelete and /sapapo/delete_pp_order, but system is not picking up the orders to delete.
    The system shows as message as " No deletion of converted orders in active version"
    As I said earlier, the product is no longer existing in ECC, hence I can not delete the orders from there.
    Is there any other way to achieve this? Is there any BADI to do this in APO?
    Regards
    Manotosh

    Hi
    You can use /SAPAPO/DELETE_PP_ORDER report for deleting these orders.
    Execute the this report, mention all the products for which you want to delete the order and execute it. It might give the message as orders will not get deleted as inactive in APO.
    Go back please enter as DEL_EXECU, in the place where we use to enter the T-codes and enter and than again execute the report. It will delete the orders.
    You can also try /SAPAPO/SDORDER_DEL report.
    Thanks
    Amol

  • Release  PR Should not get deleted in md51,planning mode 3

    Hi all,
    We are facing a problem in MRP run taken through transaction code MD51. This Problem (as explained below) will occur when MRP control parameter for Planning Mode will be set to u20183u2019 (Delete and recreate planning data).
    During normal course, if MRP control parameter for Planning mode is set to u20183u2019, system deletes all open PR & Planned orders & creates new PR & new planned orders. 
    But in our business scenario, where we have release strategy for MRP generated PR, even these released PR get deleted. This results in re-analysis & releasing of MRP generated PR which itself is a tedious & time consuming task.
    We are looking for a solution where  PR will not get deleted during MRP.
    Thanks
    Sukumar
    Edited by: skumar kalame on Nov 10, 2008 1:59 PM

    Hi,
    The planing time fence is maintained in MRP-1 view of the material in workdays. You can also have this defined in the MRP group. But the value in material master takes precedence over MRP group.
    Use - It is a kind of safety fence which is used to protect any automatic changes to take place for firm order proposals during MRP run.
    Depends on - Firming indicator needs to be maintained for the MRP type. This can be set in customizing for the MRP Type. This basically specifies how you want to firm the order proposals. Please note there are 5 types of firming
    The SAP help for firming type reads as below:
    firming type 0
    The system does not firm procurement proposals automatically.
    firming type 1
    Procurement proposals that move into the planning time fence are firmed automatically, as soon as their date lies at least one day before the end date of the planning time fence. The date of new procurement proposals that are created in the planning time fence is displaced to the end of the planning time fence. These new procurement proposals are not firmed.
    firming type 2
    Procurement proposals that move into the planning time fence are firmed automatically, as soon as their date lies at least one day before the end date of the planning time fence. The system does not create any new procurement proposals within the planning time fence; that means, the system does not balance the shortage situation in the planning time fence.
    firming type 3
    Procurement proposals that move into the planning time fence are not firmed automatically by the system. All procurement proposals that are necessary for requirements coverage are displaced to the end of the planning time fence.
    firming type 4
    Procurement proposals that move into the planning time fence are not firmed automatically by the system. The system does not create any new procurement proposals within the planning time fence; that means, the system does not balance the shortage situation in the planning time fence.
    If helpful award points
    Regards,
    Vivek

Maybe you are looking for