OpenGL and GLX on Solaris Intel

Can OpenGL and GLX be added to Solaris Intel without having to use Xfree86?
I have built the Mesa libraries but still need the GLX extensions.
Does any one know of an easy solution?

Hi Senthilkumar,
Thanks for reply!
I found a couple of intel 10/100 network cards in our town, there are INTEL N232 10/100 PCI, INTEL PRO100+ 10/100 PCI, Intel 8460 10/100BT, I am not sure which one you were talking about, can you give me some detail information please?
Thanks again.
Mark

Similar Messages

XBMC, OpenGL and intel GM965 TV-Out

Hi !
I'm trying to set up an XBMC media center based on Arch, and I have some problem to get XBMC working with tv-out.
The media center PC is a laptop with broken LCD screen, so I'm using TV out as main display.
Xorg works fine, so as Chrome browser and other apps, but apps which uses OpenGL only gives me a black screen. I have tested with XBMC and Mednafen OpenGL output, and screen gets black for both. If I use Mednafen standard SDL video output, it works fine.
Hardware is an Intel GM965 chip, here's the lcpi output :
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile PM965/GM965/GL960 Memory Controller Hub (rev 03)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (primary) (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (secondary) (rev 03)
00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 03)
00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 (rev 03)
00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 (rev 03)
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 03)
00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 03)
00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 03)
00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 4 (rev 03)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 03)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 03)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 03)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #1 (rev 03)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev f3)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801HEM (ICH8M) LPC Interface Controller (rev 03)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) IDE Controller (rev 03)
00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA AHCI Controller (rev 03)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 03)
05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetLink BCM5906M Fast Ethernet PCI Express (rev 02)
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01)
Here is my Xorg log file
I'm using Archlinux LTS kernel :
$ uname -a
Linux myhost 2.6.32-lts #1 SMP Tue Mar 15 09:48:41 CET 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 550 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
The XBMC version is 10.1-1, it's the the one packaged for Arch, from the community repository. I also tried xbmc-git package, but I had the same problem, so I get back to community package.
Is there someone here using this kind of video chip with XBMC on TV-Out ?
Is there a way to tell XBMC to use standard SDL video out instead of using OpenGL (like mednafen does) ?
Is there any options missing at xorg level ?
Thanks in advance for your help.

Hi !
glxinfo output :
$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL
OpenGL vendor string: Tungsten Graphics, Inc
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.10.1
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
OpenGL extensions:
I don't have xorg.conf, I just have 3 files under /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d :
The two default files 10-evdev.conf and 10-quirks.conf :
$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-evdev.conf
# Catch-all evdev loader for udev-based systems
# We don't simply match on any device since that also adds accelerometers
# and other devices that we don't really want to use. The list below
# matches everything but joysticks.
Section "InputClass"
Identifier "evdev pointer catchall"
MatchIsPointer "on"
MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*"
Driver "evdev"
EndSection
Section "InputClass"
Identifier "evdev keyboard catchall"
MatchIsKeyboard "on"
MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*"
Driver "evdev"
Option "XkbLayout" "fr"
EndSection
Section "InputClass"
Identifier "evdev touchpad catchall"
MatchIsTouchpad "on"
MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*"
Driver "evdev"
EndSection
Section "InputClass"
Identifier "evdev tablet catchall"
MatchIsTablet "on"
MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*"
Driver "evdev"
EndSection
Section "InputClass"
Identifier "evdev touchscreen catchall"
MatchIsTouchscreen "on"
MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*"
Driver "evdev"
EndSection
# Collection of quirks and blacklist/whitelists for specific devices.
# Accelerometer device, posts data through ABS_X/ABS_Y, making X unusable
# http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22442
Section "InputClass"
Identifier "ThinkPad HDAPS accelerometer blacklist"
MatchProduct "ThinkPad HDAPS accelerometer data"
Option "Ignore" "on"
EndSection
And I have added a file named 10-monitor.conf to force 640x480 resolution to display on old TV CRT monitor :
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "TV"
HorizSync 30-50
VertRefresh 50
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen_TV"
Device "Card0"
Monitor "TV"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "640x480"
EndSubSection
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
Option "AccelMethod" "uxa"
Option "Tiling" "true"
EndSection
Section "DRI"
Mode 0666
EndSection
I tried with and without "DRI" section, but it doesn't change anything

Is it Possible to install oracle 9i 32 bit on Sun Solaris Intel Edition

Dear OTN Members ,
It is possible to install ORACLE 9I Sun SPARC Solaris (32 Bit) on
Sun Solaris Intel Editon 2.8 . Please inform me on
email :-
[email protected]
[email protected]
Thanking You
Piyush Patel
- Server name :- pi.com
- Filename
- Date/Time
- Browser + Version : Netscape 4.7
- O/S + Version : Sun Solaris Intel Edition 2.8

857211 wrote:
I just need some advice on installing oracle 11gWhat part/product of "oracle 11g" exactly?
Installation Guides should be clear enough, if read. Also read Release Notes for additional support/unsupport info.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e24186/reqs.htm#CHDHGGFE
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e24187/pre_install.htm
However the Installation Guide for Database Client adds:
"Note: Oracle provides 32-bit (Windows x86) and 64-bit (Windows x64) versions of Oracle Database Client. _Oracle certifies 32-bit Oracle Database Client on Windows x64_." (underline added)

Solaris intel (x86) DCA not saving when rebooted.

I'm working with a Panasonic CF-71 toughbook laptop. I have loaded the 2.6 Solaris intel OS and the Xig PCMCIA patch. I have been successful in getting a 3Com 3C589D card to work, but only if I enter into DCA at boot time and delete the PnP ISA PCMCIA device at port 3e2-3e3 and then add a ISA PCMCIA device at port 3e2-3e3. Unfortunately this must be done every time the system is rebooted. Does any one know of a way to do this delete/add using the /etc/system file? Any help is much appreciated.
Matt . . .

Hi
I have download Solaris 9 x86 and Cd1 at boot time gives the same error as you mentioned. I am using my Toshiba Satellite A60. I have check the HDL list and its not listed there. Does it mean I can not install Solaris 9 x86 on this box. When I boot I get the same error which is mentioned above.
For more information I never installed Solaris in past and have no idea which Disk space /partition to be created it talks about in Install Guide.
Can some please clarify and do let me know where am I going wrong and how to fix it.
Thanks in Advance
Owais

Solaris Intel to Solaris SunSparc Portability

Hi. Is anyone out there aware of any code portability issues for
a software application that is written on Solaris Intel and subsequently
deployed on a Solaris Sun Sparc workstation ?
Does the code need to be tuned ?
If needed, what is the effort required ?
Thanks.
Aran

The source code is the same for both versions of Solaris. As long as
your code doesn't make any ISA or endian assumptions, your port
should be nothing more than a recompile.
-- richard

OAS installtion on Solaris intel based

Dear all,
I have to do a installation of OAS on Solaris Intel machine.. Sunfire 440. I can only find the below installation guide on oracle.com. I can find only for Solaris Operating System (SPARC 64-Bit) and not intel .. can anyone guide me with this ?
Oracle Application Server Installation Guides
AIX 5L Based Systems (64-Bit) HTML PDF
HP-UX Itanium HTML PDF
HP-UX PA-RISC (64-Bit) HTML PDF
Linux Itanium HTML PDF
Linux x86 HTML PDF
Microsoft Windows HTML PDF
Microsoft Windows (64-Bit) on Intel Itanium HTML PDF
Solaris Operating System (SPARC 64-Bit) HTML PDF
TIA
Kai

You should follow the doc that you found for solaris, the thing is that the patches and fixes for this that you would found are for the PARISC server, if you can get the same patches and fixes for your intel server, use them and if you can't start the installation process, try to run installer like runInstaller.sh -ignoresysprereqs.
Greetings.

OpenMP on Solaris/Intel

Hi,
Will OpenMP be supported on Solaris/Intel?
Erling

c> Has there been a time set on when this configuration will be tested
c> and supported?
I'm afraid this is unlikely to happen at all. As far as I know,
Solaris on Intel doesn't represent a large enough target market to be
worth porting to. What little market share it ever gained is being
rapidly eaten by Linux.
<b
Let us pray:
What a Great System.
Please Do Not Crash.
^G^IP@P6

64-bit compilation problem on Solaris/Intel: 7th argument not initialized

I have a problem when compiling a program on a 64-bit Solaris Intel server. The problem is that when calling a function, if the 7th or next arguments are long arguments and I pass uncasted small integers values to it, the first 32-bit of my values are uninitialized.
I have isolated the problem in the following source code.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <strings.h>
void fnc1(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
long a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h;
printf("%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld\n", a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h);
void main()
fnc1(0x10101010deadbeef,0x20202020deadbeef,
     0x30303030deadbeef,0x40404040deadbeef,
     0x50505050deadbeef,0x60606060deadbeef,
     0x70707070deadbeef,0x80808080deadbeef);
fnc1(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8);
}I compile it using the following command:
cc src1.c -g $* -m64 -o prog1.exeWhen I run the resulting .exe, I get the following result:
1157442768875667183,2314885534015405807,3472328299155144431,4629771064294883055,5787213829434621679,6944656594574360303,8102099359714098927,-9187201948855714065
1,2,3,4,5,6,8102099355978170375,-9187201952591642616The problem is that the first 32 bits of my 7th and 8th arguments are not initialized when the function is called.
I know that in the following cases, I do not have the problem:
- if I cast the arguments;
- on other platforms (AIX, SunOs/Sparc, HPUX) or if I compile in 32-bit;
- if I use optimization (-xO1 to -xO5) ;
- if I prototype my function at the beginning of my source (void fnc1(long a,long b,long c,long d,long e,long f,long g,long h););
I have over 1,000,000 lines of existing code to support. I am afraid using optimization would have other impacts and for now, I cast the arguments as problems are reported. Would there be a better way to handle this? By using a compiler switch?
Thanks in advance.

Tom.Truscott wrote:
clamage45 wrote:
But if you are passing to an ellipsis, you either cast actual arguments to the type the function expects, or the function extracts the default promoted type. Such code always works ...Yes, and developers should attempt to accomplish just that. Alas this is very difficult to ensure, particularly given the lack of a run-time type checking mechanism.In theory, proper use of the ellipsis function would be documented, and programmers would read and follow the documentation. In practice, some programmers don't read the instructions, or forget them, or someone ill-advisedly changes the way the function works so that existing calls stop working. Variable-argument functions are a fragile mechanism. (I program almost exclusively in C++, which has combinations of features such that variable-argument functions are rarely, if ever, needed.)
Can one even assume that the value of the NULL macro is correct? Never, because the C standard allows a variety of definitions for NULL, and implementations vary. Passing NULL to an ellipsis is a recipe for failure. Don't do it.
>
Suppose you have function FI with an ellipsis that expects to get int arguments, and another FL that expects to get long arguments. When you port the code to a 64-bit environment, function FL fails. If you use the -signext option, function FI will fail.Ah, but for us FL never fails, since the compilers always widen the arguments. I fail to see the circumstance in which widening would cause FI to fail, could you please give a more specific example?
void FI(int count, ...)
    va_list va;
    va_start(va, count);
    int t;
    while( --count >= 0) {
       t = va_arg(va, int);
       do_something(t);
}Function FI expects to extract 32-bit int arguments. If compiled with -signext, the calling function will pass 64-bit arguments. Perhaps the -signext option also causes the 32-bit extraction to be changed to a 64-bit extraction. I have no personal experience with the option, and I'm not in a position where I can experiment right now.

8i Database Solaris Intel Platform

From where should I download 8i Database for Solaris Intel Platform, as there is no such link at OTN software download.
TIA & regards
Muhammad Siraj

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by bhrigu nagal ([email protected]):
its available on the oracle site http://technet.oracle.com/software/products/oracle8i/software_index.htm <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Thanks Bhrigu.
I have checked this site and i also downloaded the version 8.1.7 for solaris. when i try to run the ./runInstaller file it gives me a error as "Syntax error on line number 1" and returns back to $prompt. I was told that this is the version only for Sun Sparc Solaris. There is no 8i version for Solaris 8 on intel platform.
Is that right ??.. or do U have some more information on that. probably anybody has tried that or so ??..
Thanks
Sudesh.
null

Oracle 8i on Solaris Intel (create dabase failed!)

Hi All,
I having been trying to create an oracle database on my Solaris
Intel box for a while now but the process always fails when its
about to create the sample database. It fails with an error:
ORA-03113 - unexpected end of channel reached.
And then I keep getting an "Oracle not available" message.
I am not doing anything extraordinary, just the normal
installation.
My guess is that there maybe something wrong in the gerenared
pfile. what dow you think?
Regards
michael

Hi Where can I get detailed instructions about how to install
oracle8i on solaris intel
Olu

Oracle 9 for Solaris (Intel) x86?

Did oracle drop support for Solaris (Intel) x86? I run a shop with a large scale intel server running Solaris 9 (x86) and would like to try out Oracle 9i on it.
Please advise: [email protected]
Thanks!

You can find information about Oracle product certifications here,
http://otn.oracle.com/support/metalink/content.html
You can also find information about desupported platforms in the same place. This link is available from "Get Support" navigation element on OTN home page.

Installing Oracle 8i in Solaris Intel Version With Pentium 4

Hi Guys,
I am trying to Install Oracle 8i under Solaris 8 Intel version with Pentium 4 processor fixed.But iam'nt able to continue after I click "Install" button,the runInstaller exited badly with no response.I was told that even Installing Oracle under Windows P4 is facing the same problem,but on searching I got solution by renaming a DDL file before starting installation.Is there any similar method to do for installing it under p4 processor on solaris intel 8 version.

Dear Mr. Kumar, i am chandrasekaran from singapore, actualy i need your help regarding the intel sun os oracle. I have Intel Based SUN OS, but i try to get Oracle CD Any version either 8i or 9i for intel sun os.
One of my friend have the cd but it already damaged so that i need your help.
My address
S.Chandrasekaran, Blk 84 #07-93, Commonwealth close, Singapore 140084. If you have the cd you make one copy for me and send by post. Thank you
My email id: [email protected] or yahoo.com
by chandran.s

Who knows - Has Oracle plan to make 9i on Solaris Intel x86 in the future?

Now Sun continue support of Solaris Intel, But Oracle release only 8.1.7 exist.
Any comments,please

Hi again,
assumption proven ;-)
full details from Oracle below
HTH,
Peter
Applies to: Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 10.2.0.1
SymptomsWhile installing Oracle10gR2 on a Solaris 10 x86-64 server, Oracle Universal Installer (OUI) reports the following errors while checking the kernel parameters:
shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295 found no entry . Failed <<
shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100 found no entry . Failed <<
shmsys:shminfo_semmni=100 found no entry . Failed <<
shmsys:shminfo_semmsl=256 found no entry . Failed <<
The overall results of this check is Failed.
The kernel parameters do not meet the minimum requirements
CauseOUI is looking at /etc/system to check the kernel parameter settings, but this file is not used (by default) in Solaris 10
OUI should check the kernel parameter settings using the resource control utility ( /bin/prctl )
SolutionTo implement the solution, please execute one the following steps:
1. Verify that the kernel parameter settings are correct using the resource control utility ( /bin/prctl ) and then start OUI like this:
./runInstaller -ignoreSysPrereqs
OR
2. Include the recommended kernel parameter settings in the /etc/system file and start OUI as normal:
./runInstaller

Install Oracle on Solaris Intel

I have purchased Oracle8i Enterprise Edition, Release 2(8.1.6) for Intel Unix(Solaris Intel), and have installed successfully. However, as soon as I shut down and reboot the machine, I can connect to sqlplus
internal, but I cannot log into the database as "sys".
The procedure I did is as following:
Immediately after the installation (message says "installation successful"),
1. Log in as user "oracle" in the Bourne shell.
2. At the $ prompt, type "sqlplus internal"
3. It come out with SQL prompt
4. SQL> show user ( I typed show user under SQL prompt)
5. Then it return "sys"
Things seemed to work fine at that point.
But, when I shut down and reboot the machine and logon again, and follow the same steps 1-5 as above, it did not work. When I did the "show user" command at SQL prompt, the user is not "sys", instead it returned
" ". I followed the installation guide and tried to reinstall 5 times.
Every time I had the same problem. I was wondering if this is a bug in
the CD. How can I solve it?
Thanks,
Lillian

Got past this spot... Thanks to the beefier shared memory/semaphore settings in this website (from another response in this forum)
http://www.dbspecialists.com/4dbas/presos/oracle817solaris.html

Broadvision Enterprise 5.5 on Solaris Intel?

Hello, I hope you can help me on this:
I'm in the process of procuring all the necessary compatibility info on Broadvision and Intel and came across Solaris 8, Intel...
Has anyone attempted to run Broadvision 5.5 (Solaris) on Solaris 8, Intel?
Any help or hints would be greatly appreciated.
Please email me at: [email protected]
Thanks in advance.

However, if you can kick Broadvison enough they should simply be able to recompile their Sparc version for Soalris Intel (assuming they've written good clean architecture independent code). You may need to show them a business case..... (as test, productisationand support all cost)

OpenGL and GLX on Solaris Intel

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for