Operation level Component Assignment

In MTO scenario with VC and Engineering, the sales order specific engineering BOM is
derived through VC and around 80% complete at the time of sales order creation.
Engineering activities are carried out and sales order specific production BOM is derived
very late in the process.
So, operation level component assignment is not at all possible in advance.
need to get different components assigned to different operations at at time of
production order creation/change automatically.
Is there any function module,exit or Bapi or some other method with help of which
operation level component assignment can be done automatically in the production order.

Hi,
Just a quick thought:
If your order is having status CRTD or REL (but without any confirmations, goods issue, settlements) then you can use the Read PP Master Data (Order header - Functions - Read PP Master Data) & this will re-read your routing & BOM. But for this to work for you, the routing should be updated with the assignments.
So what you could do is start processing your order as late as possible, thereby you can re-read the BOM & Routing as the modifications take place.
But if this is not possible in your scenario, then i am not aware of a BAPI or a FM which adds components to different operations in production order, you might evaluate writing a BDC program for the same. Anyways will update you if i manage to find a BAPI or a FM for this.
Hope the above helps.
Regards,
Vivek

Similar Messages

  • Assign role request through code not going to Operational level

    Hi All
    We are trying to assign roles through code using the OIM API's as suggested in the documentation
    "http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/doc.1112/e28183/oim_up.htm#autoId40".
    We have 2 Approval policies one is at Request Level (i.e. Auto Approval) and the other is Operational level(Scope=ALL Scope) with workflow, So once the request is getting raised with the code successfully it is getting completed. The expected behavior is that it should go to the approval workflow attached at operational level.
    When we tried to attach a workflow at the request level, the request is going through Approval workflow attached at request level and once we approve at request level it is getting completed and not going to operational level.
    But we will have Request level as auto approved and Operational level with two level of Workflow.
    Thanks in Advance

    Check whether you have configured Request Type in your approval policy properly for operational level approval. In the Rule Components section check whether you have configured everything correctly. Also dont raise the request from system admin login as it will be treated as a direct provisioning request and your approval policies will not be invoked. Login through an end-user and test it

  • Reporting on Operation Level costing / Operational Account assignment data

    Hi folks,
    Please can anyone here with experience in dealing with extracting Operation Level costing (OLC) / Operational Account assignment (OAA) data for Maintenance Orders share their experience.
    We have done some basic checking around this and Account assignment at activity level has been enabled.  Been trying to use 0PM_OM_OPA_2 extractor to get this Operational Account assignment data but no luck.
    Perhaps PM Consultants familiar with OLC/OAA solution can help answer this. What are the tables to look at for getting to this Operational Account assignment data?
    Any clues will be appreciated.Thanks for your help!

    Ravi,
    transactions IW40N and IW49N.
    Adilson

  • Printing the Pick List at operation level

    Hi all,
    Is  it possible to Print the Pick List at operation level.
    Components are assigned  to each operations and release of  production order takes place at operational level. Once operation is released then only relavent component assigned to that particular operation should come in pick list.
    Thanks in advance for your time and efforts.
    Regards,
    Siva
    Edited by: Siva Kumar M on May 19, 2008 3:40 PM

    Hi ,
    System will not select the Opertaion which has status CRTD by default.
    For further selection please try with below settings. ,
    Profile = std profile
    Production Order Number,
    Selection at Operation level
    System status = CRTD  and Actiavte Excl .check box.
    Now system will display the pick list for  released operation and it`s component only 
    Please check, Reward if it is useful.
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Kumar on May 19, 2008 3:45 PM

  • Standard Report for missing parts at production order operation level?

    Hi PP Gurus,
                We have standard report for missing parts at production orders level.
    For our client, they need a report for missing parts analysis at production order operation level. Do we have any such standard report in the SAP?
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Reddy.

    Hi Arvind,
          Thanks for for your response.
    1. List: Components,  Layout: Standard layout          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/withdrawn  quantity for each operation of production order. It is not showing the commit quantity.
    2. List: Components,  Layout: Pick list          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/withdrawn  quantity for each production order.
    3. List: Components,  Layout: Missing Parts List-Material View          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
    4. List: Components,  Layout: Missing Parts List-Order View          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
          We are unable to get the solution from all these 1 to 4 reports from COOIS.
    Do we have any option to change the existing layout (ex: 3 ) to get the commit quantity for operation with missing parts indicator?
    If avilable, what is the procedure to be followed?
    Thanks,
    Reddy.

  • User status at operation level

    Hi,
    I have created one user status profile and attached in order type. In this profile I have included Operation and Order header as an "Allowed object type"
    My problem is when I am changing  user status at order level , it is not getting changed automatically at operation level.
    Pls suggest me the solution.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I dont think it is possible .
    A suggestion not sure if it works .
    Assign user status profile operation wise and then have some development to check the operation status and
    then update production order status with same user status you mentioned in operation.
    FM: STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN will help you to change the user status of order.
    Regards,
    Vishal

  • Cannot attach documents at order operation level in PM order.

    Hi,
    We have recently upgraded to EHP6 and I have activated the EAM business functions including LOG_EAM_CI_6. In my PM work order, on the Additional Data tab, I can see the "Document Assignment" section at the bottom. Here I attach an existing document and choose Assign to Order. Then I attach another existing document and choose Assign to Operation (0010). After saving the order if I go back into it (IW32/IW33). the document assigned to order header is still there but the document attached to the operation disappears.
    I have defined the document type that I am assigning at header level and operation level in Customizing for Cross-Application Components under Document Management --> Control Data --> Define Document Types. I have also specified in Customizing that the assignment to objects PMAUFK (order) and/or PMAFVC (operation) is allowed for the document type of those documents.
    Can someone please advise what's wrong here ? I have to attach/assign docs to operations.
    Thanks,
    Sandy

    Hi Sandy
    Can you please make sure two things:
    1) IMG --> DMS --> Control Data --> Define Document Types --> Select Doc Type ---> Define Object Links. It must be something similar to this one. Without entering CREATE DOCUMENT settings, you may not be allowed to attach a document. That might be causing the issue. If you do not want from within IW31, someone is creating documents then make sure this setting has value =2.
    One more possible reason for this is 1:n field in this same setting. If 1:n is not selected, please read the help for that field and make sure the uniqueness of your document attachment to objects.
    2) IMG --> DMS --> Control Data --> Maintain Screen for Object Link
    For this one make sure that you have a screen entry for PMAUFK and PMAFVC.
    Now if attachment does not work, try creating a document and let us know what is the error message.
    And do you know that there is another way of attaching documents to the operation which is attaching them as PRT. Just select the operation, click on PRT button and select document and attach it.
    I hope this will help.
    Regards
    Savas
    Message was edited by: Savas Yazici

  • In process inspection - Rejection Booking at operations level

    Hi All,
    Need some help regarding inporcess inspection.
    As we aware about '03' insp type is not stock relevant
    The requirement is , i having operations are like 0010 ,0020 ,0030 ,0040,0050 in Production order in Routing
    Now while operation wise confirmation i want to book the rejection and that needs to get effect on further operation confirmation.
    For example : Suppose I have confirmed 50 TON against operation 0020 , hence at the time of confirmation 0020 i want to book the rejection 2 TON
    Hence while confirming 0030 system should not allow to cofirm 50 TON , system should allow to confirm only 48 TON through CO11N and Some where that rejection has to be display in report.
    Is there any provision in standard to enter rejection at operations level.
    Stock posting not required , Only qty tracking required like operation wise confirmation.
    Please advise to make this scenario success.
    Thanks,
    Abhishek

    Hi Abhishake,
    As in inspection type 03 lot you dont have stock posting option, you can scrap the rejected material operation wise in CO11N at the time of confirmation (Mov Type 551).
    As scraped material will no more in system, you can also look forward for bi-product assignment in bom if you don't want to go with first option.
    Also you can check for early lot creation if can solve the purpose, as in this case you will get inspection lot of inspection type 04 at the time of release of production order and stock will be adde to quality inspection as you do confirmations operation wise.
    Regards/Rohit

  • UD at operation level

    Hi,
    Is there any possibility in standard SAP for UD to be given in in-process inspection at each operation level of production?
    Please answer.

    You can use the functionality Operatoin Complete.  This is available in 6.0, maybe a version earlier.  Can't remember when it came in.  You'll find the config set up under,
    QM-->Quality Inspection >Resutls Recording>Make Settings for Operatoin Complete.
    It will allow you to assign the selected set of UD codes to the inspection type/plant combination.
    This functionality has not integrated functions in SAP at this time and is primarily information only.  But you could use user exits at various points and custom programming to check that operations are complete before performing other actions in the system.
    FF

  • Rework activities in operation level in routing

    HI SAP GURUS,
    As per blue print   rework is to be treated  as a additional operation in the routings, where ever required. In shop floor control activities  client  requires for a check for rework activity  in each operation level , they have 21 operations. Please clarify is it really viable to go for a rework check in each operation level,  how I can set the rework operation in routing.?
    thanks,

    Hi
    Yow can follow the below procedure to create a rework order and Assign it to the trigger point
    1.) Create Reference Operation Set ( T.code ca11)
    2.) Create Standard Trigger Point (T.Code co31)
    Enter the Trigger Point usage /Group as FERT.
    Tick the Trigger Point Functions.
    3.) Enable the indicator creates order with Reference.
    4.) Enter the system status as PCNF.
    5.) Enter change as +.
    6.) Enable the indicator once.
    7.) Now place the cursor on the create order with reference.
    8.) Goto Parameters.
    9.) In the Parameter enter in the group the created Reference op set group no.
    Reward points if usefull
    Regards
    Palaniappan

  • Interested in your experience implementing operation-level costing

    Greetings,
    I'm interested in anyone's experience implementing OLC.  After reading OSS note 1002335, implementing OLC was viewed as a core-mod.  If you have implemented it, did you face any major issues?  What are some of its limitations that your client experienced?  Any information is much appreciated. 
    I am interested in the ability to calculate planned cost at the operation level specifically.
    Regards,
    Matt Herzog

    Matt,
      We had a look at it early last year but dropped it since it viewed as a core mod.However at that time we were told that in EHP5/6 this functionality would be provided as standard.
      If you are willing to wait it out, it looks like Operation Account assignment is part of EHP5. I am not sure if it replaces the OLC.You may want to get in touch with your sales rep for more info on this.But existing documentation indicates this as
    Operation Account Assignment
    The Operation Account Assignment solution permits a single plant maintenance or customer service order to have cost objects at the operation level. Each of the account assignment functions available for the header are now possible at the operation level, delivering more flexibility in task costing.
    Customers in asset-intensive industries such as utilities, oil and gas, transportation, public sector, and mining
    Customers in industries requiring detailed maintenance costs for regulatory reporting
    Customers working on multiple assets with different accounting requirements for the same work order
    However, if you are just looking for planned cost calculation, the simpler alternative might be to develop a custom report.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    Narasimhan

  • Download component assignment

    Hi,
    Is there a table or other ways to download the relationship between materials and operations (results of component assignment) in routing?
    Thanks!

    Hi Harvey
        Table PLMZ stored the relationship between operation and  component ,but if you want get more detail ,you have to connect to table  STPO .
         The relationship as below:
          Table PLMZ ,key field :
            PLNTY  Task list type
            PLNNR  Group
            PLNFL   Sequence(it may have more than 1 sequence in a routing due to alternative or parallel sequence)
            PLNKN  TL Node -  Task list node (it stand for Operation , but not  simply equal to operation no,  Say in a routing ,there are 3 operations  0010 /0020/0030 ,in here ，for operation 0010 the TL node  is  1, but  if  you delete it and create an new operation 0010 ,it may become to 4. pls  link to table PLPO to get the operation no. )
            you can get below information :
            STLTY  BOM category
            STLNR BOM
            STLAL Alternative
            STLKN  Nodes
            WERK_STL Plant
           Connect to table STPO ,then you can get the material no and other things .
           Hope this can help you .
    Joe.Li

  • PM: change all Orders from sub-operation to operation level

    Hi Folks,
    I've a requirement to change all PM-Orders from Operation-SubOperation to only Operation Level.
    Example:
    Op SubOp --> New Op   (no subOp)
    10__10__-->____10
    10__11__-->____11
    10__12__-->____12
    10__13__-->____13
    10__14__-->____14
    20__10__-->____20
    20__11__-->____21
    Does someone here know, how I can make do this in an easy and save way?
    The only way I see is to make an own report with calling BAPI BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
    Have someone another solution
    - SAP-Standard-Report?
    - LSMW?
    Regards

    Hi Raghu,
    Many Thanks for your quick reply.
    Okay ... no LSMW.
    And also no Standard-Reports?
    Do you think, making my own program is the best way?
    Regards,
    Daniel

  • BAPI to change data at operation level

    Hi,
    I have this requirement:
    I need to change data at operation level, more particularly Person No (PERNR) by using a BAPI.
    Is there any BAPI - in which I can pass the basic data (say Order data and Operation data) and change the PERNR for it.
    The name of the BAPI and its usage will help.
    Ankur

    Hello,
    Assuming you are talking about maintenance or service orders, you can use BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN. See function module documentation from SE37. The structure BAPI_ALM_ORDER_OPERATION contains PERS_NO field.
    -Paul
    Please use Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) forum for PM/CS specific topics
    Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM)

  • Error in operation level result recording

    Hi,
    I need held; result recording of inspection type =03 (operation level Quality inspection)
    A product manufacture via three operations (10, 20, 30)
    All operation quality inspection active let operation no-10, all products reject and confirm as rework.
    Next operation level quality record is done but confirmation not allow Reason is operation -10, rework quantity, (Actual quantity is more than planned quantity)
    How to add the quantity after reworks for next operation quality inspection?
    Pl helps me finding the solution.

    Hi,
    As per your more clearence , As per Example  production order Quanity =1, passes 3 operation10,20,30
    Operation=10 require rework as per quality ,
    Operation =20 system raise the error message = Operation =10 rework .
    If want to operation =10 ok Quantity =1 then system raise error messges =Actual quanity more than planned Quanitity
    ( 1 Rework + 1 Ok ) .
    Supose rework order create and confirm then next 20 & 30 operation how complete .
    Real scenerio :- Rework on operation =10 then again Quality check then goes to 20 operation Quality check pass / Rework if rework then again quality pass then goes to next operation level
    I hope under stand my problem
    Need help- please

Maybe you are looking for