Operation level costing (OLC)

We are looking for a way to activate CU-OLC for existing open orders in a production environment. Our business challenge is that we have 8000 existing work orders in the production system not using CU-OLC. Once we promote our SPRO transport to activate the CU-OLC functionality, these existing work orders behave as per old standard SAP functionality (settlement rule only possible at the header level).
Here is some additional information on the question:
1. Our existing 8000 work orders are for order type TCOR
2. This order type has a settlement profile set to "not for settlement"
in our production system
3. There is no existing postings done to those orders (time, material,
other) are not allowed at this point
4. Once we push the transport to determine cost settings at the
activity level for this order type that only populates an entrey in
table T399X, along with another transport that will modify the
settlement profile to allow settlement, we expect existing orders to
behave as configured in table T399X.
Any idea how we can achieve this ?

Dear Sir
Can you explain what is CU-OLC functionality??
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Reporting on Operation Level costing / Operational Account assignment data

    Hi folks,
    Please can anyone here with experience in dealing with extracting Operation Level costing (OLC) / Operational Account assignment (OAA) data for Maintenance Orders share their experience.
    We have done some basic checking around this and Account assignment at activity level has been enabled.  Been trying to use 0PM_OM_OPA_2 extractor to get this Operational Account assignment data but no luck.
    Perhaps PM Consultants familiar with OLC/OAA solution can help answer this. What are the tables to look at for getting to this Operational Account assignment data?
    Any clues will be appreciated.Thanks for your help!

    Ravi,
    transactions IW40N and IW49N.
    Adilson

  • Interested in your experience implementing operation-level costing

    Greetings,
    I'm interested in anyone's experience implementing OLC.  After reading OSS note 1002335, implementing OLC was viewed as a core-mod.  If you have implemented it, did you face any major issues?  What are some of its limitations that your client experienced?  Any information is much appreciated. 
    I am interested in the ability to calculate planned cost at the operation level specifically.
    Regards,
    Matt Herzog

    Matt,
      We had a look at it early last year but dropped it since it viewed as a core mod.However at that time we were told that in EHP5/6 this functionality would be provided as standard.
      If you are willing to wait it out, it looks like Operation Account assignment is part of EHP5. I am not sure if it replaces the OLC.You may want to get in touch with your sales rep for more info on this.But existing documentation indicates this as
    Operation Account Assignment
    The Operation Account Assignment solution permits a single plant maintenance or customer service order to have cost objects at the operation level. Each of the account assignment functions available for the header are now possible at the operation level, delivering more flexibility in task costing.
    Customers in asset-intensive industries such as utilities, oil and gas, transportation, public sector, and mining
    Customers in industries requiring detailed maintenance costs for regulatory reporting
    Customers working on multiple assets with different accounting requirements for the same work order
    However, if you are just looking for planned cost calculation, the simpler alternative might be to develop a custom report.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    Narasimhan

  • Costs at Operation Level

    Hi,
    I know that Costs at Operation Level is possible in Ehp6 version of ECC 6.0, but in our system it is not available/not showing. I hope some business function need to activate to get the Costs at Operation Level node,
    Any body have idea how to activate this node in spro?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards
    Kalyan

    Hi Kalyan,
    Probably following is the Business Function/s you are searching for.
    LOG_EAM_OLC (EHP5)
    To use detailed planning, capture and reporting of costs at the order operation level. The operations have their own settlement rules enabling more accurate cost updating of multiple assets maintained using a single PM/CS order.
    LOG_EAM_OLC_2 (EHP6)
    To use enhanced BI content and XI/ESR content to read and analyse OLC data.
    Jogeswara Rao K

  • Standard Report for missing parts at production order operation level?

    Hi PP Gurus,
                We have standard report for missing parts at production orders level.
    For our client, they need a report for missing parts analysis at production order operation level. Do we have any such standard report in the SAP?
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Reddy.

    Hi Arvind,
          Thanks for for your response.
    1. List: Components,  Layout: Standard layout          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/withdrawn  quantity for each operation of production order. It is not showing the commit quantity.
    2. List: Components,  Layout: Pick list          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/withdrawn  quantity for each production order.
    3. List: Components,  Layout: Missing Parts List-Material View          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
    4. List: Components,  Layout: Missing Parts List-Order View          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
          We are unable to get the solution from all these 1 to 4 reports from COOIS.
    Do we have any option to change the existing layout (ex: 3 ) to get the commit quantity for operation with missing parts indicator?
    If avilable, what is the procedure to be followed?
    Thanks,
    Reddy.

  • Function modules to get wbs level budgets and activity level cost

    hai gurus can any one tell me the function modules or any other bapis to get the wbs level budgets and activity level costs
    thanx in advance
    afzal

    ok

  • PM: change all Orders from sub-operation to operation level

    Hi Folks,
    I've a requirement to change all PM-Orders from Operation-SubOperation to only Operation Level.
    Example:
    Op SubOp --> New Op   (no subOp)
    10__10__-->____10
    10__11__-->____11
    10__12__-->____12
    10__13__-->____13
    10__14__-->____14
    20__10__-->____20
    20__11__-->____21
    Does someone here know, how I can make do this in an easy and save way?
    The only way I see is to make an own report with calling BAPI BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
    Have someone another solution
    - SAP-Standard-Report?
    - LSMW?
    Regards

    Hi Raghu,
    Many Thanks for your quick reply.
    Okay ... no LSMW.
    And also no Standard-Reports?
    Do you think, making my own program is the best way?
    Regards,
    Daniel

  • User status at operation level

    Hi,
    I have created one user status profile and attached in order type. In this profile I have included Operation and Order header as an "Allowed object type"
    My problem is when I am changing  user status at order level , it is not getting changed automatically at operation level.
    Pls suggest me the solution.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I dont think it is possible .
    A suggestion not sure if it works .
    Assign user status profile operation wise and then have some development to check the operation status and
    then update production order status with same user status you mentioned in operation.
    FM: STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN will help you to change the user status of order.
    Regards,
    Vishal

  • BAPI to change data at operation level

    Hi,
    I have this requirement:
    I need to change data at operation level, more particularly Person No (PERNR) by using a BAPI.
    Is there any BAPI - in which I can pass the basic data (say Order data and Operation data) and change the PERNR for it.
    The name of the BAPI and its usage will help.
    Ankur

    Hello,
    Assuming you are talking about maintenance or service orders, you can use BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN. See function module documentation from SE37. The structure BAPI_ALM_ORDER_OPERATION contains PERS_NO field.
    -Paul
    Please use Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) forum for PM/CS specific topics
    Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM)

  • Error in operation level result recording

    Hi,
    I need held; result recording of inspection type =03 (operation level Quality inspection)
    A product manufacture via three operations (10, 20, 30)
    All operation quality inspection active let operation no-10, all products reject and confirm as rework.
    Next operation level quality record is done but confirmation not allow Reason is operation -10, rework quantity, (Actual quantity is more than planned quantity)
    How to add the quantity after reworks for next operation quality inspection?
    Pl helps me finding the solution.

    Hi,
    As per your more clearence , As per Example  production order Quanity =1, passes 3 operation10,20,30
    Operation=10 require rework as per quality ,
    Operation =20 system raise the error message = Operation =10 rework .
    If want to operation =10 ok Quantity =1 then system raise error messges =Actual quanity more than planned Quanitity
    ( 1 Rework + 1 Ok ) .
    Supose rework order create and confirm then next 20 & 30 operation how complete .
    Real scenerio :- Rework on operation =10 then again Quality check then goes to 20 operation Quality check pass / Rework if rework then again quality pass then goes to next operation level
    I hope under stand my problem
    Need help- please

  • Cannot attach documents at order operation level in PM order.

    Hi,
    We have recently upgraded to EHP6 and I have activated the EAM business functions including LOG_EAM_CI_6. In my PM work order, on the Additional Data tab, I can see the "Document Assignment" section at the bottom. Here I attach an existing document and choose Assign to Order. Then I attach another existing document and choose Assign to Operation (0010). After saving the order if I go back into it (IW32/IW33). the document assigned to order header is still there but the document attached to the operation disappears.
    I have defined the document type that I am assigning at header level and operation level in Customizing for Cross-Application Components under Document Management --> Control Data --> Define Document Types. I have also specified in Customizing that the assignment to objects PMAUFK (order) and/or PMAFVC (operation) is allowed for the document type of those documents.
    Can someone please advise what's wrong here ? I have to attach/assign docs to operations.
    Thanks,
    Sandy

    Hi Sandy
    Can you please make sure two things:
    1) IMG --> DMS --> Control Data --> Define Document Types --> Select Doc Type ---> Define Object Links. It must be something similar to this one. Without entering CREATE DOCUMENT settings, you may not be allowed to attach a document. That might be causing the issue. If you do not want from within IW31, someone is creating documents then make sure this setting has value =2.
    One more possible reason for this is 1:n field in this same setting. If 1:n is not selected, please read the help for that field and make sure the uniqueness of your document attachment to objects.
    2) IMG --> DMS --> Control Data --> Maintain Screen for Object Link
    For this one make sure that you have a screen entry for PMAUFK and PMAFVC.
    Now if attachment does not work, try creating a document and let us know what is the error message.
    And do you know that there is another way of attaching documents to the operation which is attaching them as PRT. Just select the operation, click on PRT button and select document and attach it.
    I hope this will help.
    Regards
    Savas
    Message was edited by: Savas Yazici

  • In process inspection - Rejection Booking at operations level

    Hi All,
    Need some help regarding inporcess inspection.
    As we aware about '03' insp type is not stock relevant
    The requirement is , i having operations are like 0010 ,0020 ,0030 ,0040,0050 in Production order in Routing
    Now while operation wise confirmation i want to book the rejection and that needs to get effect on further operation confirmation.
    For example : Suppose I have confirmed 50 TON against operation 0020 , hence at the time of confirmation 0020 i want to book the rejection 2 TON
    Hence while confirming 0030 system should not allow to cofirm 50 TON , system should allow to confirm only 48 TON through CO11N and Some where that rejection has to be display in report.
    Is there any provision in standard to enter rejection at operations level.
    Stock posting not required , Only qty tracking required like operation wise confirmation.
    Please advise to make this scenario success.
    Thanks,
    Abhishek

    Hi Abhishake,
    As in inspection type 03 lot you dont have stock posting option, you can scrap the rejected material operation wise in CO11N at the time of confirmation (Mov Type 551).
    As scraped material will no more in system, you can also look forward for bi-product assignment in bom if you don't want to go with first option.
    Also you can check for early lot creation if can solve the purpose, as in this case you will get inspection lot of inspection type 04 at the time of release of production order and stock will be adde to quality inspection as you do confirmations operation wise.
    Regards/Rohit

  • Cannot post cost of sales to operating expense cost center

    Each time I try to enter a journal (document type SA) using transaction code ZF02 I get the following error message"Cannot post cost of sales to operating expense cost center" Message no. ZABAP005.
    Even though the message is appearing currently in the system there is an identical journal that was previously entered successfully using the same cost center and G/L account combination.
    Any assistance will be appreciated.

    Zeketa,
    Look this with an ABAP consultant, this is an development.
    regards.
    Bruno Araujo

  • Printing the Pick List at operation level

    Hi all,
    Is  it possible to Print the Pick List at operation level.
    Components are assigned  to each operations and release of  production order takes place at operational level. Once operation is released then only relavent component assigned to that particular operation should come in pick list.
    Thanks in advance for your time and efforts.
    Regards,
    Siva
    Edited by: Siva Kumar M on May 19, 2008 3:40 PM

    Hi ,
    System will not select the Opertaion which has status CRTD by default.
    For further selection please try with below settings. ,
    Profile = std profile
    Production Order Number,
    Selection at Operation level
    System status = CRTD  and Actiavte Excl .check box.
    Now system will display the pick list for  released operation and it`s component only 
    Please check, Reward if it is useful.
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Kumar on May 19, 2008 3:45 PM

  • Release of Production Order at operation level

    Dear Experts,
    Production order to be released at operation level automatically one by one, after confirmation of operation.
    Let us suppose
    Op 10 ...... 10 Confirmed
    Op 20 ...... 10 Confirmed
    then in the Op 30 ..... 4 Qunatity to be released automatically once Operation 20 is confirmaed.
    Please give your valuble inputs
    regards
    Ram Kumar

    Dear Experts,
    Production order to be released at operation level automatically one by one, after confirmation of operation.
    Let us suppose
    Op 10 ...... 10 Confirmed
    Op 20 ...... 10 Confirmed
    then in the Op 30 ..... 4 Quantity to be released automatically once Operation 20 is confirmed.
    How to create trigger point for this?
    Can anybody give clear idea, what all the fields I need to maintain ?
    regards
    Ram Kumar

Maybe you are looking for