Operation Mapping Error

Hi Gurus,
Anyone familiar with the error below? this occur during the test configuration in integration builder (integration directory)
"Operation Mapping
OM_DESADV_DELVRY03_ZDELVR0X_TO_ED_InterfaceToConex
Runtime error
Runtime exception occurred during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_DESADV_DELVRY03_ZDELVR0X_TO_ED_~; com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException:The processing instruction target matching "[xX][mM][lL]" is not allowed."
Thanks

Hi,
Quoting XML Bible:
The first line is the XML declaration:
<?xml version=u201D1.0u201D standalone=u201Dyesu201D?>
This is an example of an XML processing instruction. Processing instructions begin
with <? And end with ?>. The first word after the <? is the name of the processing
instruction, which is xml in this example.
So that means, in your Operation Mapping, you are using "xXmMlL" which is not a processing instruction that is known e.g XSLT, CSS, HTML or XML
Hope this helps,
Mark

Similar Messages

Operation Mapping Error while testing Configuration in ID

Hi Experts,
We are configuring a B2B interface using RNIF adapter to XI adapter. The RNIF adapter is the Sender adapter , which send data using XML format. XI adapter is the Receiver adapter for ECC. Message Mapping and Operation Mapping tests in ESR are running without any errors. But while testing Configuration Test in ID, we are getting the following error:
Interface Determination
| PIPP21_V020201_Seller | eInvoice_seller_RNIF | | PIPP21_V020201_Buyer
Sender
Communication Party
Communication Component
PIPP21_V020201_Seller
Outbound Interface
eInvoice_seller_RNIF
Namespace
http://ongc.co.in/xi/RosettaNet/PIPP21_V020201
Receiver
Communication Party
Communication Component
PIPP21_V020201_Buyer
RuntimeException during appliction Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_SLB_XSD2AProxy_ Thrown: com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: The processing instruction target matching "[xX][mM][lL]" is not allowed. at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf7.Transformer.checkParserException(Transformer.java:172) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf7.Transformer.start(Transformer.java:141)
please do needful
Thanks
Laxman

Hi,
this means that you didn't copy the message correctly to the test tab in ID
try doing it once more - if it worked in ESR it has to work in ID in the same operation mapping
so it has to be a copy&paste error
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Error while executing operation mapping

Hi All,
I am getting the below the error , while executing the Operation mapping, whereas the same payload
working fine with message mapping. Please suggest.

Hi Chandra,
Please refer to mark's comment provided in below thread:
Unable to display tree view
Regards,
Akshay

Error in Automated activity of BPM using the PI operation mapping.

Dear Experts,
We have a BPM process, where we have imported Operation Mapping, to use it in an automated activity. We have created the service reference with localhost and checked the local provider system check box and with type WS.
While running the scenario the process stops at the automated activity (having the Operation mapping), with error:
A technical error during invocation: Could not invoke service reference name
I have tried to recreate the step couple of times but it is always the same error.
Could you please share your expertise in how to over come the error.
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Ajay

Hi Ganesh,
Thanks for your response.
SOAP and Mail scenario are also using the same inbound proxy structure , and the proxy is working fine in both cases.
For FTP scenario we are reusing the same inbound proxy but we are facing error .
SAP is getting
"XML to ABAP Conversion error with error id as "CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT " System expected the element 'Namespace of the inbound service interface' .
Please guide.
Thanks,
Ruchi

Error in Operation Mapping for Idoc to File Scenario

Hi Experts,
I am doing Idoc to File Scenario for Timesheet IDoc "HRSM_C" and following step are through,
Sender agreement --> Receiver Determination --> Interface Determination
got stuck in Operation mapping, it sahows error
"Unable to find resource 193c0e01-bd37-11dd-850c-d879ac131b1f in the following software component versions: http://clarityPOCcom/sap/xi/tf/_MM_Timesheets_iDocToFile_.class-1"
Also not all the fields of IDoc HRSM_C are transferred to the XI server as I am unable to see all the fields in xml file using transaction idx5, as I suppose the reason behind may be there are no values in those fields.
Please suggest how to resove the issue and transfer all the fields from R3 to XI in Idoc eventhough it doesn't contain any value.

Hi
Refresh CPA cache using user PIDIRUSER.
Look Note 951318 for Mapping Cache Refresh.

Error in operation mapping

I have been receiving an error when I try to test the operation mapping, regarding the attribute "schemaLocation".
This error occurs after importing an xsd file which name contains character "." (dot). No error message if I substitute the
character "." by "_" (underscore). Removing the attribute "schemaLocation" from the xsd file and keeping the "." within the xsd name file, no error occurs launching the test.
Any help will be well appreciated.
Many thanks in advance for your kind support.
Regards,
Giovanni

Hi
Refresh CPA cache using user PIDIRUSER.
Look Note 951318 for Mapping Cache Refresh.

Linkage Error in Mapping and Operation mapping testing for Synchronous in NWDS

Dear Experts,
Hope you all are doing fine..
I am working in a synchronous scenario Proxy via SAP PI 7.4 to JAVA Application supporting JSON.I wrote JAVA program to convert JSON to XML and while performing test for the JAVA mapping in response structure at Operation Mapping,I am receiving following error..
LinkageError at JavaMapping.load(): Could not load class: json2xml/bin/pack/EsrJson2Xml
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: json2xml/bin/pack/EsrJson2Xml (wrong name: pack/EsrJson2Xml) at
java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.java:735)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:716) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:537)
at com.sap.aii.ib.server.mapping.execution.MappingLoader.findClass(MappingLoader.java:195)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:372) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:313)
I followed some of discussions for the Linkagae error http://scn.sap.com/thread/1418477 but could not help..
Following are details of my NWDS and PI server:
SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio
SAP Enhancement Package 1 for SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio 7.3 SP10 PAT0000
Compiled the project with JAVA SE-1.6 as well as 1.5
SAP PO 7.4 Java Only , Release: NW731CORE_10_REL
SP: 05 JDK: jdk16 Latest Change: 353688
I have taken care to export all the Jar files used in NWDS to be exported and then imported as Archived files in PI server.
But could not see the 5 jar files in ESR. I hope there is some issue with name as can see in the log.Can the issue be solved?
How to test the Operation mapping for Synchronous Message in NWDS?
Regards
Rebecca

Dear Hareesh and Experts,
I resolved the issue by doing the below steps.
1. Downloaded the JDK5 and updated the Java console i.e. JRE 15.
2. I had created this project using the JAVA Compiler with JAVA SE1.6 initially. Changed this to 1.5 in the Properties of the Project.
3. Uploaded the project again in ESR Imported Archive.
The issue is solved.
Thanks a lot for all your inputs.

XSLT Mapping error

Hi All
I am working on PI 7.1 where I have customized standard XSLT mapping according to my requirement.
I have to add 2 fields in the standard data type ReplenishmentOrder_Notfication from SNC 7.0 SWCV.
In standard scenario once IDOC STPPOD.DELVRY03 is released from ECC the PI scenario send this to SNC Proxy ReplenishmentOrderNotification_In.
In my requirement I have to send XML file generated from IDOC to one of Application Folder. I have customized data type, message type, operation mapping, service interface by coping standard things.
So the changes I have done in standard XSLT mapping are just changin name of data type and not added any mapping for the two new fields I have added to the data type as its not require at the moment.
When I am running test I am getting follwoing error in Trace. Here please notice that its mentioning standard xslt mapping program name only though on the top you see customized names.
Please give your inputs to resolve the issue. Thanks.
Operation Mapping
StppodDelvry03_MT_ReceivedDeliveryNotification_01
Name
StppodDelvry03_MT_ReceivedDeliveryNotification_01
Namespace
http://sap.com/xi/SNC/Global
Runtime error
TransformerException occurred during XSLT mapping StppodDelvry03_ReceivedDeliveryNotification_01 (http://sap.com/xi/SNC/Global, 46c20a71-248e-11dc-c4be-dd500a115642, -1)
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Mapping http://sap.com/xi/SNC/Global StppodDelvry03_ReceivedDeliveryNotification_01 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">TransfromerException during XSLT processing: Thrown: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.NestedSAXParserException: Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: XML Declaration not allowed here.(, row:1, col:8)(, row=1, col=8) -> com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: XML Declaration not allowed here.(, row:1, col:8) at com.sap.engine.lib.jaxp.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:251) at com.sap.aii.ib.server.mapping.execution.AbstractMappingTransformer.transform(AbstractMappingTransfor
Edited by: Amol on May 22, 2009 3:26 PM

Hi Amol
for the error CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">
just check this Thread issue is solved by restarting the service verifySenderAgreement
at thread
Re: Wrong Sender Agreement
Thanks
Abhishek

XSLT mapping error in PI 7.1

Hi,
The below xslt compiles and runs fine with SAPXML toolkit but the same fails with error
u201CCannot find external method 'java.util.Map.get' (must be public).".
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:map="java:java.util.Map"
xmlns:dyn="java:com.sap.aii.mapping.api.DynamicConfiguration"
xmlns:key="java:com.sap.aii.mapping.api.DynamicConfigurationKey">
<xsl:output indent="no" />
<xsl:param name="inputparam"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
    
    <xsl:variable name="dynamic-conf"
        select="map:get($inputparam, 'DynamicConfiguration')" />
    <xsl:variable name="dynamic-key"
        select="key:create('http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File', 'Directory')" />
    <xsl:variable name="dynamic-value"
        select="dyn:get($dynamic-conf, $dynamic-key)" />
    <xsl:variable name="new-value"
        select="concat($dynamic-value, 'subfolder\')" />
    <xsl:variable name="dummy"
        select="dyn:put($dynamic-conf, $dynamic-key, $new-value)" />
    
    <xsl:copy-of select="." />
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Regards,
Vishal

Hi,
I am already using jdk 5 for the same.
Can you please tell me what is the setting(s) that need to be done for XSLT to be used with JDK5.
I have a knowledge on how to develop a XSLT mapping, but fail to understand what is the relation between XSLT and JDK5.
It will be very helpful to me if you post your reply to my question here: Basic Settings in Operation Mapping
Appreciate your help and time.
Thanks.

Strange Data Mapping Errors after SEM 6 Upgrade. Please assist.

Hi All, I encountered these sudden Mapping errors after I tried to do Testing in Post Upgrade Sand Box. Here I am trying to to perform Collected Reported Financial Data under Data Collection Method for a particular Company Code 3040. Kindly help me with some quick responses as this is kind of high priority. The errors and the Diagnosis Notes I am unable to follow as I do not where I shall write those Mapping Rules they are referring to. I do not even know if that need to apply any SAP Notes as such. Once again Highly appreciate your quick response and Many Thanks in Advance.
Regards, BIP
Input conversion for field Period Value LC has invalid format Message no. UCT8210 Diagnosis The mapping rule for target field Period Value LC contains a move with a selected Input Conversion indicator. Therefore, the system performs an input conversion prior to creating the target data. However, an error in the input conversion occurred while moving the source key figure to the target key figure Period Value LC. This means that the format used for the input conversion is incompatible with the target data. System Response The system will not perform the move. Procedure Examine the mapping rule for field Period Value LC. Either select the Conversion Exit indicator or deselect the Input Conversion indicator. Execute the method again. -
3040 is incompatible with input format for field /1FB/COMPANY Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field /1FB/COMPANY from the mapping rule for the target field. 3040 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field /1FB/COMPANY. However, the value 3040 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 3040 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field /1FB/COMPANY. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field /1FB/COMPANY. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (3040) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 3040 for field /1FB/COMPANY and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field /1FB/COMPANY, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field /1FB/COMPANY in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Version Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Version has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Version. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Version. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Versionthrough mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Version so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Version. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Group Currency Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Group Currency has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Group Currency. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Group Currency. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Group Currency through mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Group Currency so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Group Currency
1 is incompatible with input format for field FISCPERIOD Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field FISCPERIOD from the mapping rule for the target field. 1 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field FISCPERIOD. However, the value 1 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 1 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field FISCPERIOD. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field FISCPERIOD. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (1) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 1 for field FISCPERIOD and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field FISCPERIOD, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field FISCPERIOD is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field FISCPERIOD in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field FISCPERIOD. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule
Input must be in the format ___,___,__~ Message no. 00088 Diagnosis Your entry does not match the specified input format. System Response The entry in this field was rejected. Procedure The entry must comply with the edit format. The following edit format characters have a special meaning: "_" (underscore) There should be an input character at this point; this should be a number for numeric fields. "." (decimal point) (applies to numeric fields) The decimal point occurs here (setting in the user master record). "," (thousands separator) (applies to numeric fields) This separator occurs (optionally) for more than three figures. Depending on the setting in the user master record, it can be a period or a comma. "V" (applies to numeric fields) The operational sign appears here. If used, it must by at the right margin of the field. The sign is either "-" or " "(space). "~" (tilde) (applies to numeric fields) As of and including this character, leading zeros must also be entered. Otherwise, this character has the same meaning as an underscore. Leading zeros need not be entered on the left of the tilde. They are not output at this position. All other characters have their normal meanings and must be entered in the same position as in the edit format.

Hi Dan,
Could you Kiindly advise me where we need to write the Mapping Rules in Consolidation Monitor? All he time the errors refering to Mapping Rules. The only Tab I seen "Mapping" is in Data Basis But as per my Understanding Iwe do not have much to do there as it is system generated Mapping Tab.
Where we actually go and select/deselct those Input Conversion Indicator/ Conversion exit Indicator.
Highly appreciate your advise.
Thanks and Regards,
BIP

Operation Mapping issue in PI 7.1

Hi there,
I am working on PI 7.1 sp7, and have lots of interfaces running on it.
There is something strange regarding Operation Mapping in Interface Determination, the thing is that when i try to assign a IM to the Interface Determination i could see it from the display table BUT i am not able to get it to the I.Det screen, so the mapping between sender and receiver interface is lost.
However, if i import any scenario from other XI system and navigate to the IDet, i could see the operation mapping with the IM in it.
Do you guys have ever experienced something similar? Could this be something related to caches?
FYI:
Cache notif in ESR and ID is ok (green)
SXI_CACHE is ok
CPACache is ok
Cache connectivity test is in yellow status ("Cache notification from Integration Directory not yet started or being edited")
INTEGRATION_DIRECTORY_HMI destination test throws 500 error but the response body is 'The WebApplicationException log ID is [26D8F0DDA80400560000015D000DA0E801028B1CD8907B66].
and i think it should be ReqID not found.
Could you please help me on this?
Thanks in advance and best regards,
David

Hi David
I think this error is documented in note #1286212 Binding rec0 is not found in the brick error in mapping.
The solution is as following:
(http://<server>:<port>/rep)
-> Administration.
-> Repository (tab)
-> Java Web Start Administration
-> Re-initialization
Repeat this action on the Directory tab.
Regards
Mark

XSLT Mapping Error while receiving Base64Binary content

Dear Experts,
I am new to SAP PI and working on PI 7.11. In our project we had a requirement to receive PDF file content in Base64 format from third party system by consuming the service provided by third party system with synchronous communication. The adapter we need to use is SOAP
The reason to use XSLT mapping is as our third party system used some tokens in both the request and response header, I used XSLT mapping to add the required details in request header after receiving the request from ECC system and skip the details in response to send the response to ECC system.
I have build two XSL files with XSLT mapping programs one for request and another for response using Oxygen XML editor tool. Both are checked, validated without any errors and also tested in ESB – Operation mapping which is successfully executed without errors.
The third party is sending the PDF content in Base64Binaryformat. I have also tested the WSDL from Oxygen to check the whether the service is working fine, which also successfully receiving the response from third party system.
The thing I do not understand and not able to figure out the problem is, when executing the service from ECC by sending a sample request, there is no response coming back and receiving an error saying
“TransformerException occurred during XSLT mapping Response_03 (URN:COM.XYZ_GET_ABSENCE_DETAILS, aa3a6491-e318-11e2-c1d7-c14948250cb4, -1)”
I have checked the Communication Channel which working fine. And also the message status in message monitoring wherein Request message has “Cancelled with errors” status and Response has “To Be Delivered” Status.
Could you please any of you help to figure out the issue and resolve the same.
Thank you in advance.....
Regards,
Govardhan Duvva.

The response am receiving is like below

<html><head><title>Apache Tomcat/6.0.18 - Error report</title><style>

</style> </head><body>
<h1>HTTP Status 415 - </h1>
<HR size="1" noshade="noshade"><p>
<b>type</b> Status report</p><p><b>message</b>
<u></u></p><p><b>description</b>
<u>The server refused this request because the request entity is in a format not supported
by the requested resource for the requested method ().</u>
</p><HR size="1" noshade="noshade"><h3>Apache Tomcat/6.0.18</h3></body></html>
And also in SXMB_MONI, there are two call adaptor nodes as in below picture, which means our request is going to the third party system ?

XSLT Mapping Error - Split-MappingRoot-Tag missing

Hi,
I am getting "Split-MappingRoot-Tag missing" Error while using XSLT mapping. I am using 3 mappings in one Operation Mapping.
1) Java Mapping 2) Message Mapping 3) XSLT Mapping.
When I have these mappings in a BPM one after another it is working fine.
But ,if I put these mappings one after another in one Operation mapping it is giving problem after message mapping is complete.
I tried to remove XSLT mapping and Msg Mapping is producing correct output which can be used as input for XSLT mapping.
Any idea what could be the reason. Any hep is appreciated.
ERROR
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Split-Mapping</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>Root-Tag missing</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:Stack>Split-MappingRoot-Tag missing</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
Is there any chance XSLT mapping starting before message mapping is complete
Regards,
Ramesh

Thank you for your response.
I tried to put XSL in the following format by adding that namespace. but it still giving same error.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
Code ---
</xsl:stylesheet>
Also I itried to put Java mapping before XSLT mapping to see what payload is coming to XSLT.
I am getting payload as:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"><ns0:Message1>
XML Payload Data --
</ns0:Message1></ns0:Messages>
Any one knows how to fix this issue? appreciate your inputs
Regards,
Ramesh

Basic Settings in Operation Mapping

Hi Experts,
I am working on SAP PI7.1 and have some doubts regarding the options available in Operation mapping.
We need to use SAP XML Toolkit option for older versions of XSLT mappings, while for the newer versions we need not use the option. The newer version of XSLT is based on JDK 5. Now my question is how to make the XSLT mapping compatible to JDK 5? What is the procedure/ tool to be used?
I have already referred:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/EN/8c/447891e999478f8a4394ab566bc343/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/EN/73/f61eea1741453eb8f794e150067930/content.htm
And also some of the replies by Stefan Grube on SDN for similar questions, but still unable to know how to make XSLT compatible to JDK 5
Thanks.

Hi,
If in it case it throws some error, you may post here. I believe that such compatibility procedure won't be required all the time.
As per the guidelines older versions of XSLT mapping wont work without the mentioned option being checked.
Post PI7.1 and PI7.1 EHP1, all the XSLT mappings should be compatible with JDK5 and none of the earlier XSLT versions will work then.
So as of now we can make the Mappings work by selecting the SAP XML Toolkit option but the future versions wont have this option.
Thanks.

PI 7.1 - Operation Mapping stays blank after applying a value

Hello,
I am trying to recreate an interface that I had in XI 3.0 in my development PI 7.1 system. But every time I try to add an Operation Mapping (Interface Mapping in XI 3.0) it shows me a "value list" I select the correct mapping and then hit accept. But the operation mapping does not appear and there is no error message telling me anything.
I'm having a look at installing patch 1307777 but I'm not too confident that is the issue because although one of my mappings is a split mapping the others are not.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Matt

Hello Matt,
I was facing the same problem. I can sugest you temporary suggestion, Like goto Interface determination - > From where you select the OM just right click on the square then select Input Help -> value list from there it will show the selected OM and you can see that in column.
PLease verify and let me know if this works or not.
Edited by: Siddhesh Pathak on Apr 13, 2009 4:45 PM

Operation Mapping Error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for