Optimal configuration for inspire 5700

I juz bought a inspire 5700 and a audigy 2 ZS. Currently i am using the digital connection through the Digital Din input on the decoder from the Digital out of the soundcard. However, when i m playing mp3, only the centre and front speakers are working, the rear speakers are only playing some background music. When i m using the DTT 2200 speakers before this, all my 4 satellites are playing loud and clear. When i try to use analog connection (green and black) on my inspire 5700, no sound is coming out from the speaker. I wonder y. I already disable the digital out from the speaker setting. Is anyone using this speaker and can u advice me on how to configure the speakers and soundcard to achieve good quality sound? Thanx alot.

otarboy wrote:Ok i have tried setting the CMSS to stereo surround. However, i dun feel much difference from the CMSS2 or CMSS setting. The rear speakers are producing muffled sounds of the songs unlike the front speakers which are very clear in the singing. Also i tried to play mp3 songs using analog connection and the result is almost like digital output. When i was using the DTT 2200, all four speakers sounded equally clear since they are analog output but how come the analog output of Inspire 5700 is so different? I have already turn up the surround volume till 3/4 max and yet i cant feel the surround of music. So if i dun watch dvd on my pc, does that mean the Inspire 5700 is performing worse than my old DTT 2200?
Hey budd I use my CMSS3D settings too but I leave them set on stero surround and use InterVideo WinDVD6 Platinum Edition ver.B06.083 and don't use Creative Mediasource DVD-Audio Player ver..50.08 cause with that version sounds like there is static on the cd and complicating playback on the cd but thats a bug in creative software but to my knowlage anything in there previous ver. works well off but with InterVideo WinDVD6 PE software of mine they give me settings with it called audio booster pack and I can give my back speakers a Boost of +25 and I can hear well off then with that and does wanders on my DVD'S as well with DVD audio.
PowerDVD I don't like because of conflicts with creative drivers but I don't care for that cause InterVideo software is much better IMO
P.S. you don't have to worry about changing the settings in CMSS3D after you set it to stereo surround because DVD software has no affects with that CMSS3D or atleast to my ears they don't but you could have super sonic ears too hehe... but the settings do take affect in reguler Windows Media Player and Creative Mediasource and other media players out there
Also for your digital audio yes it must be recorded in 3D audio or it will not work right and with analog it would just upmix it unless you want to try on your digital to upmix it by the remote on the speaker settings of yours hardware wise and see if that don't help?
but also digital helps RIAA out in copyright protection of course there are ways around that too but I am not pramoting anything illegal so I will leave that subject alone for you all thinkers out there
after listening to the included dvd-audio disk that comes with Creative Soundblaster audigy2 zs gamer LE card through InterVideo WinDVD6 Platinum ED you can tell a kickass diffrence I mean it's the type that gives ya goosebumps cause you love hearing waht you hear coming from your speakers hehe..... at least try the demo and if ya love the demo get with me at [email protected] and I may share ya a full retail version for just being a helpfull person that I am
Good Luck both ways buddy give it a try you will love it
Message Edited by RLemmon on 12-30-2004 07:59 AM

Similar Messages

  • Optimal configurations for webobjects using Java Monitor

    Can someone please let me know the optimal configurations for webobjects? We need details on the number of instances which can be created per cpu on the application server. Please also provide information on the thread configurations per instance in java monitor.

    I do need the threads to communicate. The fact is that I simplified the thing just to understand better responses from you :). The real problem is more complicated. I have a arbitrary number of threads of two different classes. These threads have to access a shared resource (I used the boolean free). Moreover I have to give precedence to one of these two classes. So, I used to integers to represent two queues. The fact is that only the first thread to be ran reaches the end. The others, I saw, reach the wait() method, but then they stops and the program does not finish.
    I mean that I thought this: the first thread to reach the wait() passes. Then, this first thread starts to use the resource (free becomes false). Every other thread which reach the while(...) stops there (there is the wait()). Then the first process, at a particular time, release the resource (free = true) and communicate this to another thread which was stuck at the wait() instruction (through the notify()). The problem I see is that every thread reach the wait() and stops there. After the first one is finished, no more... The notify() does not give the monitor to another thread (which would find free = true). This is my problem. Do you understand?
    Many thanks for yuor answer anyway.

  • Converting analog 5.1 (multiple cables) to Digital DIN (for Inspire 5700), how?

    Hi,
    So far I've been using my Inspire 5.1 Digital 5700 speaker system together with my Audigy Platinum in my Desktop PC to watch DVDs and play games with a 5.1 experience. To connect soundcard and Speaker system, I used the provided Digital DIN cable, and it worked fantastically, for both, DVDs and games.
    Now I bought a notebook and the only choice to improve onboard sound was the X-Fi Xtreme Audio Notebook. I thought that I could simply connect it to my Inspire 5700 by connecting optical out with optical in using a TosLink-Mini -> Toslink cable. While this may work for DVDs (I don't have the cable yet), it won't work for all other applications, because as I read optical connections only provide a stereo signal unless the signal it'ss encoded via AC3 or DTS.
    Of course there is the docking module which provides multichannel analog out. Trouble here: the Inspire 5700 only comes with two analog line in channels, front and rear. So that would lead to 4.0 instead of 5.1. Missing the center speaker for games is very bad.
    Therefore I am looking for a way to convert the analog signal coming from the docking module into something that can be decoded as a 5.1 signal by the Inspire 5700. I have already found the DTS-610 which would turn the analog signal into a DTS signal. But that costs more than the soundcard itself.
    So, my question: Is there any simpler / cheaper way how to transform multicable analog 5.1 to one-cable digital 5.1, either AC3, DTS or Digital DIN? I'd prefer a simple converter to Digital DIN, because that's what the Inspire 5700 was mainly designed for and it worked perfectly with my old Audigy.
    Alternatively, one could possibly also use some fancy software to convert all the wave-out sound into AC3 or DTS and send it along the optical cable. But I don?t know any such software plus I expect this to drain a lot of processor power.
    Any help is greatly appreciated it'ss kind of frustrating that two products of the same company can't be connected with each other, just because neither, the card nor the docking module provide Digital DIN.
    Thank you very much and best regards
    - spitfire
    P.S. in another post, pjc said: You will probably require a 4-pole mini-jack > DIN converter to connect your Creative speakers to this socket.
    That's exactly what I'm looking for, but I couldn't find such a converter on the creative homepage.

    I believe the DIN for soundcard are mainly built and solely used by Creative. I don't think there is any 3rd-party converter in the market to do DIN. There is a software here posted by some other users that can do AC3 encoding on the fly. Not too sure where's the post now but you can do a search for it.

  • Replacement for Inspire 5700 + Creative Audigy Platinum

    Hi,
    for many years I have been using a combination of a Creative Audigy Platinum soundcard with a Creative Inspire 5.1 Digital 5700 speaker system. I am very pleased with the quality, compatibility and easy-to-useness of this system. For games and music, I let the soundcard do the decoding and send the bits via digital connection to the Inspire system, which I set to 5.1 DIN. For DVDs, I send everything via SPDIF and let the Inspire do the decoding, either DTS or Dolby digital. Works just perfectly.
    Only problem: if everything works according to the plan, I will move from Europe to the States in two months and stay there for - 3 years. Because desktop computers and probably also my Inspire 5700 system are quite tricky to ship, I decided to buy a laptop here and buy another speaker system by creative after I have a arrived in the states. Full of anticipation I checked this site to choose my future system and ... was struck by shock:
    I couldn't find any system which offered the same features as the Digital 5700! All modern systems lack digital input, leave alone an external decoder and have primitive wire-remotes instead of real remotes! Why has this kind of great system disappeared? Of course you cannot buy the good old 5700 anymore, which leaves me with a great problem of how to organize a system which offers similar quality and features.
    I originally planned to connect my laptop (ASUS A8JS) via S/PDIF to the new inspire 5.1 speaker set, which would then do the job of decoding digital audiostreams coming from DVDs. But well, since the new Inspire sets neither support S/PDIF nor offer external decoding, that idea has been flushed down the toilet
    What do you recommend instead? I guess I will need a USB Sound Blaster in combo with an inspire speaker set. What will provide the same quality to what I had? What are the drawbacks of not having digital connections any more? How can I control sound levels of the subwoofer, center and rearspeakers, if there is no external decoder anymore? Only via software?
    Thank you very much for any advice!
    - spitfire

    Thank you very much for your helpful replies! Future looks much brighter now
    Where have you found the Audigy 2 NX? On their webpage, creative only list the USB Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS Video Editor or the Sound Blaster Live! 24-bit External as USB-solutions. Since I don't need the video editing capability, the Audigy 2 ZS would probably be quite an overkill. Still, the price difference between Audigy ($250) and Life! ($50) is ... drastic! Besides the video stuff and some connections, what else is the Life! solution missing? Does it have poor quality? Is there no real 3D sound, just some kind of upmixing? It's not very clear from the specifications.
    The Logitech Z-5500 Digital looks very promising, too. A consequent improvement of the Inspire D-5700, just by the competition I may go for that one, but probably still need an external soundcard for 3D-sound in games.
    I am not exactly an expert considering connections. So, my laptop will already have digital S/PDIF built into the headphone plug. Just from the look, I'd say this is the same kind of plug which is called "Analog/Digital-Out" on my old Audigy sound card. Now, the logitech system supports digital optical or digital coaxial as source input. Will this work with the S/PDIF headphone out, or would it require the DIN connection you mentionned? Could this be easily solved by buying an adaptor?
    Looking at the picture showing the connections of the SB Life! I again am not clear at all what kind of connections there are (http://us.creative.com/products/prod...Specifications ). Is there anything compatible with the Logitech system? I guess it's no question the Audigy2 ZS is equipped with the required connections.
    So, to summarize my question: could I digitally connect either my laptop or the SB Live! 24-bit external with the Logitech Z-5500, so that the latter would take care of decoding Dolby Digital and DTS sound, while the sound blaster would provide EAX and 3D sound for games?
    I have also seen that Creative Labs still offers an external decoder with a lot of connection possibilities. It's just no longer part of a speaker system, but rather a standalone product: the Creative Decoder DDTS-100 for $30. Together with a good speaker system, this may be an alternative to the logitech solution, in terms of enabling to plug in other devices than just a computer (another thing I really loved about my old system).
    Well, again thank you very much for your advice!
    - spitfire

  • Looking for 9-pin mini DIN to 9-pin mini DIN GREEN for Inspire 5700 digital

    hi guys, I'm looking for this cable.
    9-pin mini DIN to 9-pin mini DIN (2 meters - Green)
    for my Inspire 5700 digital.
    http://images.americas.creative.com/...mall89___6.gif
    Currently I'm using the RED version from FPS2000, but I get no sound for Center speakers and SubW. So I suspect both cables are different internally although the connectors are the same.
    Anyone knows where to get it in Msia.. or can I buy it from Creative Spore?
    OR
    Anyone using this set with analog mode, then can sell this DIN cable to me..
    Thanks

    hi body,where did u get that cable?i need that cable too!!!!!!!!!
    please help me out!!!!u can check my post in this forum
    http://forums.creative.com/creativel...message.id=448

  • Optimal configuration for Cisco E3000 Router

    Hi All,
    Following are the details of my current home network setup, I would like to hear more recommendations and drawbacks of this setup.
    ISP has provided with a Cisco  DPC3825 DOCSIS 3.0 Gateway which has 4 Ethernet ports and a wireless networking but only 2.4 GHz.. This router is connected to the cable CPE box to internet. I have enabled the Firewall features of this router and disabled the Wireless network. This has also the DHCP server running. 
    The Second router is a Cisco E3000 which supports 2.4 GHz / GHz wireless networking. Connection to gateway is made via the 1st Ethernet port of gateway and then to the Internet port of E3000 router. I have connected my wireless devices to E3000 with GHz wifi lan. This router also has the firewall activated and DHCP server running as well.
    Both routers have WEP2 Personal / AES security configured. Currently these two devices are on two different IP ranges ..etc gateway is 192.168.0.1 and e3000 is 192.168.1.1.
    The E3000 is primarily configured for my online video for TV (Panasonic Vireacast). Please let me know if this is the best configuration or any other possible options.
    Thanks,
    RG

    This configuration is called LAN to WAN configuration and this is the best configuration considering that you want to behave both the router as a router.
    Because the other confiuration would be LAN to LAN then you can only use 1 router as a router and 2nd router as a switch.
    http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=529c188bc0ee4f7da79ffc22f2be33ec_4579.xml&pid=80&r...
    The first configuration in the article is is LAN to LAN, scroll down the window for LAN to WAN configuration.

  • Optimal Configuration for WebLogic

    I've already installed weblogic but recently appears some problems of connections that I created.
    The problems are:
    1.- My links do not work even when they are created and configured.
    2.- WebLogic gets slow there any optimal settings?
    Thanks
    Edmar

    OK..
    1.- My first problem is when I create a JDBC connections for my applications, connections don't work when you turn off or turn on weblogic the test point is disappear.
    2.- It's ok depend on what I run but some tips to try to configure it?
    Thanks
    Edmar

  • Best Xserve configuration for MySQL?

    Basically, I'm trying to figure out the optimal configuration for our next Xserve. Obviously, more RAM, more CPUs, more and faster disks in RAID, etc will improve things. But considering that money doesn't grow on trees, what have some of you found to be particularly cost-efficient in building an Xserve to run mainly MySQL where there are many small INSERTs on indexed (!? tables of 10 million or more rows (DB size of ~1GB, presently). I realize it's kind of a "depends if" type of question, but I'm just curious what people have found. (I've also read that AnandTech article that wasn't too kind to Mach.)
    Anyway, I was thinking of an quad-core Xserve with 4-8GB of RAM, and a RAID5 set of 15K SAS drives. Well, there's not much in terms of options anyway. But this box will be like I said 90% running services that depend on MySQL performance. Some Web services, but mainly automated MySQL stuff.
    Should I even bother to look at a Sun or Dell running Linux?
    I'm presently running primarily an Xserve dual G5 2GHZ with MegaRAID in RAID5. As I said, the key database is about 1GB with ~10 million rows (mostly in just two tables). So, small data sets, already heavily indexed... Anyway, any thoughts are very welcome. Here is a status snapshot of the past couple days:
    Traffic ø per hour
    Received 1,168 MiB 21 MiB
    Sent 1,631 MiB 29 MiB
    Total 2,799 MiB 49 MiB
    Connections ø per hour %
    max. concurrent connections 92 --- ---
    Failed attempts 0 0.00 0.00%
    Aborted 81 1.43 0.08%
    Total 98 k 1,731.89 100.00%
    Total ø per hour ø per minute ø per second
    6,409 k 113.27 k 1.89 k 31.46
    Query type ø per hour %
    admin commands 41 0.00 k 0.00%
    alter db 0 0.00 0.00%
    alter table 7 0.00 k 0.00%
    analyze 3 0.00 k 0.00%
    backup table 0 0.00 0.00%
    begin 0 0.00 0.00%
    call procedure 0 0.00 0.00%
    change db 98 k 1,734.77 1.56%
    change master 0 0.00 0.00%
    check 0 0.00 0.00%
    checksum 0 0.00 0.00%
    commit 0 0.00 0.00%
    create db 0 0.00 0.00%
    create function 0 0.00 0.00%
    create index 0 0.00 0.00%
    create table 1 0.00 k 0.00%
    create user 0 0.00 0.00%
    delete 210 3.71 0.00%
    delete multi 0 0.00 0.00%
    do 0 0.00 0.00%
    drop db 0 0.00 0.00%
    drop function 0 0.00 0.00%
    drop index 0 0.00 0.00%
    drop table 1 0.00 k 0.00%
    drop user 0 0.00 0.00%
    flush 0 0.00 0.00%
    grant 0 0.00 0.00%
    ha close 0 0.00 0.00%
    ha open 0 0.00 0.00%
    ha read 0 0.00 0.00%
    help 0 0.00 0.00%
    insert 214 k 3,776.04 3.39%
    insert select 5,725 101.18 0.09%
    kill 6 0.00 k 0.00%
    load 0 0.00 0.00%
    load master data 0 0.00 0.00%
    load master table 0 0.00 0.00%
    lock tables 16 0.00 k 0.00%
    optimize 0 0.00 0.00%
    preload keys 0 0.00 0.00%
    purge 0 0.00 0.00%
    purge before date 0 0.00 0.00%
    rename table 0 0.00 0.00%
    repair 0 0.00 0.00%
    replace 0 0.00 0.00%
    replace select 0 0.00 0.00%
    reset 0 0.00 0.00%
    restore table 0 0.00 0.00%
    revoke 0 0.00 0.00%
    revoke all 0 0.00 0.00%
    Query type ø per hour %
    rollback 0 0.00 0.00%
    savepoint 0 0.00 0.00%
    select 941 k 16.64 k 14.92%
    set option 855 15.11 0.01%
    show binlog events 1 0.00 k 0.00%
    show binlogs 43 0.00 k 0.00%
    show charsets 121 2.14 0.00%
    show collations 121 2.14 0.00%
    show column types 0 0.00 0.00%
    show create db 15 0.00 k 0.00%
    show create table 376 6.64 0.01%
    show databases 129 2.28 0.00%
    show errors 0 0.00 0.00%
    show fields 675 11.93 0.01%
    show grants 46 0.00 k 0.00%
    show innodb status 393 6.95 0.01%
    show keys 37 0.00 k 0.00%
    show logs 0 0.00 0.00%
    show master status 0 0.00 0.00%
    show ndb status 0 0.00 0.00%
    show new master 0 0.00 0.00%
    show open tables 1 0.00 k 0.00%
    show privileges 0 0.00 0.00%
    show processlist 18 0.00 k 0.00%
    show slave hosts 0 0.00 0.00%
    show slave status 0 0.00 0.00%
    show status 415 7.33 0.01%
    show storage engines 8 0.00 k 0.00%
    show tables 186 3.29 0.00%
    show triggers 0 0.00 0.00%
    show variables 283 5.00 0.00%
    show warnings 0 0.00 0.00%
    slave start 0 0.00 0.00%
    slave stop 0 0.00 0.00%
    stmt close 0 0.00 0.00%
    stmt execute 0 0.00 0.00%
    stmt fetch 0 0.00 0.00%
    stmt prepare 0 0.00 0.00%
    stmt reset 0 0.00 0.00%
    stmt send long data 0 0.00 0.00%
    truncate 0 0.00 0.00%
    unlock tables 16 0.00 k 0.00%
    update 260 k 4,600.62 4.12%
    update multi 0 0.00 0.00%
    xa commit 0 0.00 0.00%
    xa end 0 0.00 0.00%
    xa prepare 0 0.00 0.00%
    xa recover 0 0.00 0.00%
    xa rollback 0 0.00 0.00%
    xa start 0 0.00 0.00%
    Begin
    Variable Value Description
    Flush_commands 1 The number of executed FLUSH statements.
    Lastquerycost 0 The total cost of the last compiled query as computed by the query optimizer. Useful for comparing the cost of different query plans for the same query. The default value of 0 means that no query has been compiled yet.
    Slow_queries 338 The number of queries that have taken more than longquerytime seconds.

    RAID 5 is the worst possible storage option for databases.
    That's not to say it won't work, but it has an overhead that will impact disk I/O, especially writes and it sounds like your data set is write-heavy.
    This is because a write requires a Read-Modify-Write process for every write - whenever you write data to the array it has to read all the existing data in the corresponding blocks, recalculate the new parity data, then write it all back.
    This may or may not be a problem for you, depending on actual quantity and scale of the writes, but if you're looking for the best configuration, RAID 5 is not it.
    For optimal performance use RAID 0. Of course, RAID 0 has no protection, so you need to deal with that.
    The ideal combination is RAID 0+1, but that requires a minimum of four drives, while the XServe can only handle three internal drives.
    As for the rest of it, you really need to analyze your data more before you can get an answer.
    The number of rows is largely irrelevant if you're just inserting data. It has some bearing on indexes, so you need to look at how your data is indexed.
    As for memory, the ideal configuration is at least enough memory for MySQL to load all the indexes into RAM - most lookups should be indexed and if those indexes fit entirely within the memory space you're off to a good start.
    Note that the standard MySQL is 32-bit, so you're limited to 2GB for InnoDB or MyISAM (whichever you're using). You'll need the 64-bit version to use more memory than that.
    Most performance bottlenecks (and gains) can be traced to either indexes (too many indexes can be just as bad as not enough), and application (there's significant overhead in opening a new MySQL connection (which is a large factor in the AnandTech article), so try to ensure that your application uses connection pools (where a number of connections are opened when the app starts, and reused through application processes rather that a new connection opened for every query). Without knowing the application it's impossible to narrow that one down much more.
    As for Sun or Dell - sure, they're options. Just be aware that you'll need Solaris or Linux admin skills in order to get the most out of them. They may (but not necessarily will) perform faster at the end of the day, but it may also take you much time and heartache to get there.
    The other thing that you don't mention is why you're looking to upgrade. Is the G5 currently stressed? If so, where? what's the typical CPU load? disk activity level? network load, etc.
    It doesn't make any sense upgrading the machine if the network is your bottleneck - all you're going to do is move that same bottleneck to a different machine.

  • Optimal Hard Drive Configuration for Premiere Pro CS5 and Pro Tools

    I am in the process of upgrading a workstation that is used primarily for multi-track audio recording in Pro Tools to use the following Adobe CS5 products for production of promotional videos in HDV (and AVCHD for the web) as well as printed marketing materials for bands and musicians: Premiere Pro, Encore, Photoshop, Illustrator and Soundbooth.
    Since Premiere Pro is probably the most demanding application of the group, I have been studying the suggested hardware configurations on this forum with great interest, particularly HARM's suggestions (including his Generic Guideline for Disk Setup) to determine which hard drives to purchase and the optimal manner in which to configure them.
    I am upgrading an HP Z800 with dual quad core 2.44 GhZ processors with hyperthreading (16 virtual cores), 12 GB of memory and an overclocked GeForce GTX 470.  Without setting up a RAID configuration (which I cannot afford at the moment), I would like to use the 4 available HDD bays in the Z800 in the optimal manner for Premier Pro, using currently available drives.  I am currently considering purchasing a 300GB VelociRaptor to use as my C drive because of the extended load times and demands placed on the drive by ProTools and the associated Waves plug-ins.
    I would appreciate suggestions to improve my following plan:  C (300GB  WD VelociRaptor) for OS and Programs; D (1 TB WD Black Caviar) for Media and Projects; E (1 250 GB WD Black Caviar) for Pagefile (approx. 18 GB) and Media Cache; and E (2 TB WD Black Caviar) for Previews, Exports and Pro Tools audio files.
    I have great respect for the knowledge of the members of this forum and eagerly await your suggestions.
    /Bill

    I very much appreciate the responses to my email because I know that all of your time is valuable and that you have chosen to use some of that valuable time to help an unknown individual.  This forum is remarkable because of the wealth of knowledge available and the willingness of so many to assist others.
    I now wish to narrow my questions to save you time and so that I can get specific advice.  I may not have not been clear that I have already upgraded to the HP Z800 with dual quad core processors and overclocked GTX 470, primarily for the improved performance it will provide in ProTools.  My question now is how to optimize its performance for Premiere Pro CS5.  Based upon my research, I am considering the following two upgrades, but I am open to other suggestions if they would provide better results at a similar cost
    1. I am considering purchasing a 600GB WD VelociRaptor ( WD6000HLXH) for my C drive on which I would place OS (Windows 7, 64 Bit) and programs in an effort to reduce loading times of large programs.  I have two questions: (1) Are members of the forum seeing a significant improvment in program loading times with the VelociRaptor because I am still not convinced that the price performance of SSD's justifies their use; and (2) There are so many models of VelociRaptors now that I want to be certain that I am purchasing the best version for my needs.  In addition to the usual 10000 RPM speed, this model has 32MB Cache and a 3.5" form factor as well as a SATA 6.0GB/s interface (which I doubt my motherboard can take advantage of but it might extend the useful life of the drive with future configurations).
    2. I currently have available for installation in the Z800 the following drives:  (1) WD 2TB Black Caviar; (1) WD 1TB Black Caviar; (2) Hitachi 1TB.  I believe that the Z800 can accept up to 5 SATA hard drives which I will have if I purchase the Velociraptor.  Although I am reasonably knowledeable when it comes to hardware, I have never set up a RAID configuration.  Therefore, it would be helpful if someone could recommend one of the various RAID configurations and brieflyexplain why it would seem to be best for my needs.  I can then focus my research on understanding that one configuration.
    I was planning to follow Scott's suggestion for my current 3 drives:  OS and programs on C (WD 600 GBVelociRaptor), media and projects on D (WD 1TB Black Caviar), export files and Pro Tools files (all live musician tracks, no samples) on E (WD 2TB Black Caviar).  However, I have been reading about the benefits of a RAID configuration so I am interested in further suggestions now that I have clarified my questions.
    Thank you all for your help.
    Bill

  • The backend of system SAP_R3_UWL is not configured for optimized delta pull

    Hi All,
    I used the below to configure the Enabling Delta Pull Mechanism in UWL.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/eb/101fa0a53244deb955f6f91929e400/frameset.htm
    uwl_service user created and assigened role SAP_BC_UWL_SERVICE with the help of Note 873932 - Additional note on authorization of uwl_service user. But still i am having the  below error:
    The backend of system SAP_R3_UWL is not configured for optimized delta pull
    Thanks,
    Anumit

    Hi Sean,
    I have done everything that is mensioned in the Help.
    Thanks,
    Anumit

  • Optimizing Time Capsule + Airport Express configuration for best reception?

    Hi --
    I've been trying to set up a 1st generation Time Capsule with an Airport Express to extend the range of our wifi network in our new house (see http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2722259 for background).
    As I understand it, the primary drivers for connectivity are:
    1. Technical specs of the wifi hardware.
    2. Physical positioning of the devices (base station or AE).
    3. Configuration of the network (e.g. channels)
    We don't have many options of where to place the base station, so I've been working with placement of the AE, which doesn't do much good. The issue seems to be the raw distance between the two devices, and possibly interference from other household items (e.g. wireless baby monitor, etc).
    Is the a straighforward way to cycle through any of the configuration options to see whether that will make an impact? For example, I started cycling through the channel settings by hand, but that is very time-consuming as I have to wait for both the TC and AE to update, plus run back and forth between the base station and the laptop sitting at the other end of the house to trigger a speedtest.net run. Are there any tools or utilities that would help me with either the positioning or optimal configuration settings?
    Thanks,
    Ramon

    The general rules of thumb for "extending" is that the AirPort Express should be positioned about 1/2 the distance from the Time Capsule to the area that needs more wireless coverage. This assumes there are no major obstructions in the signal path.
    A typical sheetrock and 2x4 wall will absorb about 15-20% of the signal, on average. A ceiling will absorb proportionately more since it will be thicker.
    Frankly, it's more art than a science to get an extended network working well. A quick test would be to power down the Express and take your laptop to the proposed area where the Express will be located and see if you can get a good, solid internet connection at that point. If you can, the Express may work at that position.
    Users tend to place the Express much too far away from the main wireless router when they try to setup an extended configuration. When this occurs, the Express has very little to work with because.....this is very important to remember.....
    +The Express can only extend the quality of signal that it receives.+ It does not "boost" the signal, it takes the signal that it receives and makes it go further.
    If you want to download a utility like iStumbler, this can be useful to figure out a good location for the Express by "looking at the numbers"
    But, there are never any guarantees with wireless. I wish that it were different, but unfortunately, no one can predict wireless performance in advance for any given situation. Post back if you want a few more pointers, or if you want to take a look at the Inspector feature in iStumbler.
    Message was edited by: Bob Timmons

  • Which is the optimal hard drive configuration for Logic Pro ?

    hello people
    i would like to ask your advices about possible hard drive configurations for Logic Pro
    I have a Mac Pro and thinking to buy 4 x 500GB drives .
    there are several combinations in my mind to configure , but first of all i would like to ask which is the best for an optimal system for Logic Pro
    model 1 :
    1 stripe Raid 0 array drive for ''System'' (500+500 = 1000)
    1 stripe Raid 0 array drive for ''recording + sound banks'' (500 + 500 = 1000)
    which means to using 4 hard drives as 2 drives
    model 2 :
    1 stripe Raid 0 array drive for ''System'' (500+500 = 1000)
    1 Single drive for Sound banks (500)
    1 Single drive for Recording (500)
    which means to using 4 hard drives as 3 drives
    Or , it is more healthy to use the drives as single , without raid , stripe sets but with its own capacity instead of combining .
    and also if someone has an idea regarding to compare of Seagate and Westerndigital drives (which is the best for audio recording) , would be really helpfull
    I am kinda rookie for these subjects :/
    thanks in advance

    heelo blayzay
    thanks for the reply and assistance.
    1) how can i create a back up set for the 4th HD to be make back up of the 2nd and 3rd HD
    2) what about to make 1st HD for system and 2nd3rd4th (1.5TB) for audio recording, and an external drive for backups ?
    For the back ups , is there a special process for the backing up HD (internal or external) ? Or should i just need a Clone software to make the back up
    thank you again.

  • Need help choosing optimal hardware for a laptop that will run AE CS5

    BACKGROUND INFO (Questions listed below)
    I need some help figuring out the best hardware configuration for a new laptop. I’m a student at a design school and I will be using the laptop to mainly run After Effects and to a lesser extent Photoshop and Illustrator. I don’t need to worry about 3D rendering software or Premier Pro. I am primarily interested in getting the best performance during editing. I am not looking for the best performance for final output. I would prefer to sacrifice final output times for better editing/interface performance.
    I will be working with standard definition content and perhaps HD up to 720p on occasion. I do not need to operate in resolutions higher than 720p. My projects are generally animation and use many sources and many layers.
    I’ve been reading up on optimal hardware configurations for CS5 but my understanding is still a little foggy and I would like to use this thread to figure out how to build the best machine for my budget. The budget is about $1400 to $1600 CANADIAN after tax.
    I DON’T need help finding the laptop. I will search for it on my own. I just need to understand the best hardware to purchase within my budget.
    I realize that it is probably impossible to buy the laptop I want with the hardware configuration I need “off the shelf”. Instead I will be looking for a good base model (~$900-$1100) and I will purchase the necessary hardware upgrades separately. I will not be purchasing a Mac.
    Right now I’m thinking of a machine built something like this:
    - 15”-16” screen (17” models are too big/heavy)
    - Mid to high end i5 processor OR entry level i7 quad core
    - 8GB RAM (I would go to 12GB, but it’s hard to find a 15”-16” laptop with 3 memory slots)
    - SSD to replace HDD (However, if possible, I would like a laptop with dual HDD support or swap the optical drive for another HDD. If I had access to 2 drives, I would have and HDD/SSD combo).
    - Medium/high end NVIDIA GPU to take advantage of OpenGL while editing.
    QUESTIONS
    1) Does the “Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously” option enhance general editing performance (applying filters, scrubbing through the timeline, reverting history states)? Or does it ONLY help speed up RAM previews and final output? Does it reduce the length of RAM previews?
    1b) Is this option even necessary to enable on 64bit systems? (As far as I understand it was used to solve a problem where 32bit systems/software would only recognize 4GB of RAM per instance of AE).
    1c) If I turn this option on to help with RAM previews, would I be hindering general editing performance in any way? Or does this option have basically zero drawbacks?
    2) How come “Actual CPUs that will be used” will read 0 even if the sum total of RAM assigned to the CPUs plus the RAM reserved for other applications is less than the total available system RAM (on a 64bit system)? For example, I currently have 4GB RAM and 2 installed CPUs. I have 1.5GB reserved for other programs and when I set 0.75GB per CPU both CPUs are used. However when I set 1GB per CPU then 0 CPUs are used, even though the total RAM adds up to only 3.5GB.
    CPU
    3.) Considering the fact that I am more concerned with smooth performance while editing rather than final output speeds, would it be better to get a dual core i5 clocked around 2.5 or a quad core i7 clocked around 1.8?
    4.) What is the difference between an i3 and an i5 processor even if they are clocked at the same speed? How does an i5 460M compare on the grand scheme of things?
    RAM
    6.) Should the quantity of RAM that I get (8GB vs 12GB) be based on the number of cores in my CPU? If so, how should I be calculating optimal RAM based on # of cores. Should I also be counting threads, or just actual physical cores?
    STORAGE/SWAP
    7.) Should I replace the HDD with an SSD? I'm looking for snappy interface performance while editing. I would think that if the RAM fills up it would be best to have the SSD for scratch/cache.
    8.) What performance benchmarks are most important when considering an SSD for After Effects? (4k writes? IOs per second? Max read/write?)
    9.) I can afford the OCZ Vertex2 120GB SSD. Would this be a good choice if an SSD is recommended?
    10.) Would it be better to have 8GB of RAM and an SSD, or 12GB of RAM and an HDD? Explain why.
    GPU
    10.) After Effects utilizes OpenGL to enhance editing performance. I will not really be using Premier Pro, so catering to the CUDA Mercury Engine is not a concern. Do high end gaming cards provide significant gains in OpenGL performance? Or do OpenGL performance gains taper off around the mid-range GPUs? (i.e. can you justify buying a high end GTX 260M graphics card for enhanced editing performance versus an "entry level" dedicated card like the 310M?)
    11.) What hardware specs are most important when considering a GPU for editing performance in AE? (Memory size? # of Pixel shaders? Core speed? Shader speed?)
    Thanks so much for any answers you can offer to these questions.

    Please make sure that you've read through this page and what it points to.
    > 1) Does the “Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously” option
    enhance general editing performance (applying filters, scrubbing through
    the timeline, reverting history states)? Or does it ONLY help speed up
    RAM previews and final output? Does it reduce the length of RAM
    previews?
    It only increases rendering speed for RAM previews and rendering for final output. In After Effects CS5, it doesn't decrease the length of RAM previews. (In CS4, it does.)
    1b) Is this option even necessary to enable on 64bit
    systems? (As far as I understand it was used to solve a problem where
    32bit systems/software would only recognize 4GB of RAM per instance of
    AE).
    You misunderstood. Yes, it's still relevant on 64-bit computers. Moreso, in a way. (I'd rather not spend my entire Sunday writing out detailed answers to satisfy idle curiosity, so I'm not going to give all the technical detail to that answer.)
    > 1c) If I turn this option on to help with RAM previews,
    would I be hindering general editing performance in any way? Or does
    this option have basically zero drawbacks?
    It takes a small but nonzero time for the background processes to start up when they need to be used and shut down when they're done. And as they sit waiting, they take up a little bit of memory. So, it's not exactly correct to say that there are no downsides to leaving it on. But it's close. I leave it on.
    > 2) How come “Actual CPUs that will be used” will read 0 even
    if the sum total of RAM assigned to the CPUs plus the RAM reserved for
    other applications is less than the total available system RAM (on a
    64bit system)? For example, I currently have 4GB RAM and 2 installed
    CPUs. I have 1.5GB reserved for other programs and when I set 0.75GB per
    CPU both CPUs are used. However when I set 1GB per CPU then 0 CPUs are
    used, even though the total RAM adds up to only 3.5GB.
    4GB - 1.5GB for other software leaves 2.5 GB for After Effects.
    If you have 1GB assigned per background CPU, then the foreground takes 1.2x that = 1.2GB. That leaves 1.3GB for background processes, which is enough for one background process. There's no point in starting only one background process to do rendering, so it doesn't bother. (Note: When background processes are rendering, the foreground process isn't rendering.)
    > 3.) Considering the fact that I am more concerned with
    smooth performance while editing rather than final output speeds, would
    it be better to get a dual core i5 clocked around 2.5 or a quad core i7
    clocked around 1.8?
    Get the quad-core. That gives you a greater total number of cycles. And After Effects works very well with mutliple processors, even beyond Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously multiprocessing. An entirely unrelated sort of multiprocessing (multithreading) spreads work out to multiple processors.
    > 6.) Should the quantity of RAM that I get (8GB vs 12GB) be based on the number of cores in my CPU? If
    so, how should I be calculating optimal RAM based on # of cores. Should
    I also be counting threads, or just actual physical cores?
    The optimum amount is the amount that you can cram into the computer. I'm not kidding. Spend your budget on RAM until you have 4GB installed per processor (and I'm counting the virtual processors due to hyperthreading). If you have a quad-core, that's 8 CPUs with hyperthreading, so the optimum amount of RAM installed is 32GB. You can work with less, but you did ask about optimum. For HD work (i.e., 1920 pixels across), you're OK with more like 3GB installed per CPU. That's what I have at home: 24GB in a quad-core. You're going to assign 2/3 or so of the RAM to After Effects, so 3GB installed per CPU is 2GB per core for HD work in After Effects.
    > 10.) Would it be better to have 8GB of RAM and an SSD, or 12GB of RAM and an HDD? Explain why.
    12GB of RAM. Because After Effects likes RAM. (If you're thinking of deliberatly using virtual memory to swap memory to the hard disk, don't. That's a performance killer.)
    > 10.) After Effects utilizes OpenGL to enhance editing performance.
    Not really. If you're on a limited budget, don't even think about the GPU until you've already got the most RAM, the fastest CPUs, the largest number of CPUs, two fast hard disks, and a couple of good monitors. Then, and only then, should you even consider getting soemthing beyond a non-stock graphics card. Yes, OpenGL can be used to accelerate some things, but that's only for the low-fidelity preview renderer. (Pardon the bluntness, but I want to make sure that you heed this.)

  • Optimal value for shmmax and shmall

    Hi Experts,
    Am new to the database administration side. Need help/suggestions from you all. My requirement is narrated below:
    I was going the kernel parameter for oracle 10gr2. But I have a doubt the following two parameters.
    kernel.shmall=2097152 (Default)
    kernel.shmmax=2147483648 (Default)
    Also I know that this is the recommended value for these two parameters. But just want to check if I have physical RAM of 4GB then what should be the optimal value for these parameter.
    Also can anyone suggest how to set the optimal value for these parameter.
    Thanks

    You can always set to the "Install" size and after it completes reduce them. You can move them down 25 to 30 percent in most cases.
    The default size for SHMALL in RHEL 3/4 and 2.1 is 2097152 which is also Oracle's recommended minimum setting for 9i and 10g on x86 and x86-64 platforms. In most cases this setting should be sufficient since it means that the total amount of shared memory available on the system is 2097152*4096 bytes (shmall*PAGE_SIZE) which is 8 GB. PAGE_SIZE is usually 4096 bytes unless you use Big Pages or Huge Pages which supports the configuration of larger memory pages.
    SHMMAX should not exceed 4294967295 on a 32-bit system. On x86-64 platforms, SHMMAX can be much larger than 4GB since the virtual address space is not limited by 32 bits.
    If SHMMAX is too small, you can get error messages like :
    ORA-27123
    I almost always go with the recommended settings even on tiny 1GB systems.
    With a 4GB system these probably are not worth changing.
    Best Regards
    mseberg
    Edited by: mseberg on Jul 13, 2011 5:21 AM

  • Digital DIN cable !!! inspire 5700+audigy 2ZS

    Hi,
    i need help with my inspire 5700. i don't have a digital din cable (for digital connecting audigy + inspire). Support says that cable is not available. does anybody know where to get this cable (4pole digital jack to 9pole digital DIN) or how to make this cable?
    Mic

    I believe the DIN for soundcard are mainly built and solely used by Creative. I don't think there is any 3rd-party converter in the market to do DIN. There is a software here posted by some other users that can do AC3 encoding on the fly. Not too sure where's the post now but you can do a search for it.

Maybe you are looking for