Optimal settings for 9800 PRO

Does anyone know the BEST settings for a 9800 Pro. I do not want to get a program to OC it. I just would rather change the settings than use a program. So if anyone knows what the BEST settings or know of a site that tells you the BEST settings for a 9800 Pro, I would appreciate it very much if you were to tell me. Thanks.

try rage 3d tweak...it has an overclocker too, but you dont have to use it, and it practically gives you full control over the cards settings.
http://www.rage3d.com/r3dtweak/dload/R3Dtweak39c.zip

Similar Messages

Optimal settings for quicktime pro for imovie hd

Hi!
Using QT Pro, I sent an imovie HD file (about 5 minutes) thru using h.264. It all looks pristine! EXCEPT, the transitions from imovie are bumpy, choppy, go backwards, etc.
This is to be streamed on the web. I've kept the 1920 x 1080 settings in tact.
QUESTION: What can I do to tweek the settings so the transitions are better? Would changing the key frame rate help? I left it on automatic.
Thanks for the help!

2.5millionyears wrote:
Here is the core question: My machine is an imac with a 2 gig processor and 2 gig of RAM. It should be able to handle a 69 MB file. (It plays back the 2 GB imovie file just fine.) Therefore, I believe the issue is not processing speed, rather, the issue seems to be that of how QT compresses the source video. It is very jerky on my machine, not on the web, not on a slow computer, but on my machine.
This is not entirely correct. The fact that the video is smaller is probably due to it being compressed by something like the H.264 codec. This actually requires more processor power than the 2 GB file (probably Apple Intermediate Codec) in iMovie.

Optimal Settings for FCP6 on MacBook Pro?

Up until a week ago, I've worked mostly on a Mac Pro with Final Cut Studio 2. I've been fortunate enough to get a MacBook Pro (2.6Ghz) also outfitted with FCS2 and I'm wondering if there is such a thing as "optimal settings" for running FCS2 on the portable notebook.
I'm referring to such things as memory and cache settings and Playback control, etc. I would like the MBP to run FCS as efficiently as possible. I know I won't get the same power-crunching ability as the Mac Pro but does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks for any help.

We have a 2.4Ghz MBP with the 256 MB video card.
We have 4 GBs of RAM, which you should consider.
However, without indicating what codec and cam you will be using, there isn't much more to say.
If you are working with a DV or HDV camcorder, for example, use an ExpressCard 34 FW or eSATA card and an external HDD for media.
That creates independent FW buses if you go that route or a FW bus and a eSATA HDD connection.

New stream, low upload rate... Optimal Settings for streaming games?

I've been fiddling around with FMLE for the past few days/weeks and trying to find the best quality to stream quality games such as Bad Comapny 2, Starcraft 2, Mass Effect 2, etc
I am able to play games at max settings, but when I do the stream will lag so I choose to make the settings low enough so I can stream.
The only probably right now is they seem quite blurry/pixelated - which is probably due to my upload rate of 0.8mbps from SpeedTest.net1
My specs are:
Resolution of 1680x1050 (Most of my games like Bad Company 2 are played at 1280x720 windowed mode)
i5-2500K
GTX 560 Ti
12GB Ram
1TB Hard Disk Space
Windows 7 64bit
Upload rate of 0.8mbps (and 5.0mbps download incase it is needed)
http://www.justin.tv/mrshotzzzz/videos - Bad Company 2 at the moment... There seems to be a LOT of blurryness, but it seems quite smooth.
http://www.twitch.tv/mrshotzzzz/b/293073526?id=293073526&channel=mrshotzzzz - This is my latest... (skip to 1:25 where I configure it to be good)
When I fullscreen it, around the edges mainly, I see it is pixleted.
I use 1280x720 input, and 640x360 output with 800kbps. Is it possible to make it better?
Would an output of 640x360 with a bitrate of 650kbps be better?
Would an output of 854x480 be better?
Could changing my input size to 1920x1080 make my quality better?
tl;dr What is the optimal settings for a good specced computer, but with a low upload rate (0.8mbps)?

Hi,
In iChat 3 or iChat 4 setting System Preferences > Quicktime > Streaming to 1.5Mbps is quite important.
In Tiger (10.4.x) the Automatic Setting here is read as Zero by iChat and can cause issues even when the Speed is high enough.
In Leopard for iChat 4 this Automatic setting is read as 384k by iChat (although this is the Minimum for a 4 way Video chat it may still cap your Internet Speed).
If you have to change this iChat will need a restart if open.
The real controlling factor is the Upload speed the Internet Connection speed has.
There is one other place to help with the Bandwidth/Internet Connection speed.
This is in iChat menu > Preferences > Video Section > Bandwidth Limit drop down.
This can be changed during A/V chat and changes to the Bit rate iChat is using is shown in the Connection Doctor (Video Menu).
This is best used when Really Fast Buddies (Processors and Internet Speeds) can tend to "Over-run" lesser speeded Buddies. It can also help if your ISP manages the Bandwidth/Internet Connection speed making it run slower or faster at different times of the day (Also look at Fair Usage Policies).
There is no independent way to reduce the Frame rate that would have a direct effect on this.
There are other apps that do use less demanding picture quality that in turn effects the Frame rate which can effect the Bandwidth needed/Used
See this link http://www.ralphjohns.co.uk/page5.html#_other
Scroll to numbers 5 through 8 for Apps, 9 through 12 for Web Browser options.
13 is a PC app.
14 & 15 works in Video only to MSN Buddies.
The list does not have a reference to the Yahoo Beta 3 for Mac
http://messenger.yahoo.com/mac/
7:23 PM Wednesday; August 5, 2009
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"

Optimal settings for video extraction

What are the optimal settings in final cut pro 6.0 in order to take a finished project from my computer and put it on an external drive for the purpose of transferring this file to a beta tape? Also what are the optimal settings in order to take this same project file and burn it to a DVD? I want to get the best quality video as possible as this video will be played on TV.

What are your settings now? Who will be handling the output? They are the ones to ask the question on output format for layback to betasp. I'd say Uncompressed 8-bit or ProRes (standard def)... but this is dependent on the format you are working with now too.
As for DVD...just export a QT movie (self contained, sequence settings...or REFERENCE, uncheck the self contained box) and use the DVD preset in Compressor, then send to DVD SP...or take the QT into DVD SP and have it do the encode.
Shane

Best Export / Video settings for Premiere Pro. Help Needed.

What's the best settings when you want to export a video from Premiere Pro for the web or otherwise. Best settings = good quality video and LOW file size.
Benchmark : The videos on Apple Trailers. Check them out at http://www.apple.com/trailers
The trailers are of high quality video, great sounds, and the Large sizes all fall under the 25MB mark. Any ideas on HOW this is done and what
settings in Premiere Pro CS3 might be able to replicate such standards?
Any help is appreciated. I normally use Encoder and export using H264 but that always seems to have an Audio lag. Any similar issues?
Thanks a mil!

I understand that better quality = bigger file size. That's true in most cases, but there is a way around it, I'm just not sure what that way is. As I mentioned in the original post, the benchmark is http://www.apple.com/trailers . The non-HD videos on any movie page on that site hardly ever exceeds the 25MB mark. The videos are 2-3minutes long, and while they may not be top-notch BD visuals, they look way better than 95% of the stuff that's streamed off the net.
That's why I asked if anyone had any ideas on how to replicate something like that. Say I had a avi file of great quality, shot with a Panasonic DV Cam. I Capture the footage, do whatever I have to in Pr, and the result is now a 3minute video. I want it exported to a Quicktime file, I want it to look visually pleasing like the trailers on Apple, and I want it to fall under 25MB. I have tried H.264 encoding, regular Quicktime, and Quicktime via Encoder. Nothing reaches the expected quality.
For more examples visit http://www.passionpictures.com.my/pages/recent.aspx and download those simple 30second clips. All Quicktime, mostly under 5.5MB. If Pr can't do it, then I don't know what can...so I'm sure Pr can do it.
Problem is, how? Experimentation is definitely a way to go, I get that. But on the basis of the scenario given above...how is it done?

Export Settings for Mpix Pro

Can anyone tell me specific export settings to use for mpix pro? Or, settings in general for commercial labs?
Thanks,
Bill

Changing the DPI or PPI (pixels per inch) setting has absolutely no impact on print quality. The only thing that matters is the pixel dimensions of the image. For instance, if you send an image with pixel dimensions of 800x600 pixels and expect to print a 16 x 20" print from that image, it isn't going to work. There aren't enough pixels regardless of what the PPI setting is. If you want to do the math to determine how many pixels you need that is up to you. I usually just send the full-sized image. Most of the labs that I have used will warn you if there aren't enough pixels. So if you send the full-sized image it doesn't matter whether it's set at 72 PPI, 150 PPI, 300 PPI, or whatever. You still have all the pixels and can print the same quality.
It's amazing what commercial labs can do these days. I was in a local camera store one day when they have an in-house photolab. And they were printing a very large photo on roll paper. It probably measured somewhere in the neighborhood of 3 x 4' or larger. The quality was very good. I asked them how large of an image was required for a print of that size, and to my surprise they said two megapixels. While I would recommend pushing my luck that far I was really impressed with the quality of the image.

Optimal Settings for Converting Sony AVCHD .MTS Footage for DVD Delivery

I am starting with footage from a Sony HDR-SR7 camcorder. Since iMovie is still kind of wonky with this, I am going to batch convert all my clips using the VeggieTools plug-in scripting for *Sony Vegas Pro* (under my Windows partition of my MacBook Pro). I can convert over each file into a new clip in a lot of different formats.
My goal is to *bring the footage over to Mac and edit it in Final Cut Express.* Eventually, I will be mastering and delivering on DVD (most likely through iDVD). And I am looking for guidance.
First, I have a lot of choices for the conversion format. But I am not sure what to use. I know that the original is upper field dominant and HD in size (16:9). I will eventually be going to standard DVD NTSC (with letterboxing top and bottom to fill up the format space of the 4:3 aspect ratio). And I assume that is lower field dominant.
Do I need to find some setting that lets me convert the footage to double the 29.97 fps rate while interpolating the fields? Or do I not have to worry about this? I am worried that bringing the size of the footage down will create some weird artifacts if this isn't taken care of first.
I guess the main question is, since I am looking to pretty much just edit these clips together and won't be doing much in the way of special effects, what's the best way or format to choose to *turn the HD footage into high quality SD footage* that I can quickly trim and string together *in Final Cut Express*...
Not sure if I gave enough info. I will be checking often in anyone wishes to try and tackle this one and needs more details...
And thanks for listening!!

OK my fault for not being clear on an extremely important point: I don't need anamorphic widescreen. Sorry to waste your brainpower on my lack of clarity. Mea culpa.
I intend to show this only on a standard definition TV from a standard definition DVD player. The "letterboxing" I spoke of is intentional on my part inside the standard def 4:3 frame. I will just let there be black bars at the top and the bottom.
So I don't need full super high resolution during this transfer (IF iMovie hadn't stopped recognizing my Sony AVCHD MTS camera after the first batch of video I collected, this wouldn't even be an issue. Been spending days on the forums trying all the solutions for the rest of my footage...).
But now that I have a workaround, I am just mostly confused about what to do about the field order (and thus, the frame rate) and the resizing (for convenience in size and playback speed). The original is upper first, and I am pretty sure that the QuickTime Movie I eventually make for iDVD should be lower field first (haven't tried tackling the can of worms of ideal MOV settings for an iDVD standard def disc yet).

Optimal settings for encoding HDV 1080i footage to SD dvd

I have footage recorded from an HDV camcorder and edited in FCP 1080i 60. It is fast moving sports footage shot with a high shutter speed the total running time is 40 min. I have encoded it to DVD by taking the HDV 16:9 FCP sequence dropping it to a 4by3 DV sequence to get the window box 4by3 aspect ratio and exporting this sequence as an mov. This mov was then encoded with compressor dvd 90 min best settings
I was not able to find a quick way to do the aspect ratio change in Compressor 3. Please let me know optimal settings.
The big problem however is how compressor has dealt with the high speed moving footage. Played from the DVD on a sd tv the motion is terrible. It looks like the interlacing is all off and the image doubled up. The slow mo footage used in the piece is fine.
What are the optimal settings to smooth out the motion?

this ones been discussed to death many times in the past John
most folks have found the following tutorials helpful:
http://www3.telus.net/bonsai/Step-by-Step.html
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/hdv_to_sddvd.html

Optimal Settings for Podcast Output

I'm experienced with the editing and output rendering for DVD settings for Encore CS2 and .wmv for our on-demand video hosting server. We have a request for our medical education videos to output for podcast distribution.
Other than the obvious "ideal" presentation tips of keeping any recorded powerpoint fonts and graphics as large as possible, what's the output workflow needed?
Thanks
Gil

We have a 2.4Ghz MBP with the 256 MB video card.
We have 4 GBs of RAM, which you should consider.
However, without indicating what codec and cam you will be using, there isn't much more to say.
If you are working with a DV or HDV camcorder, for example, use an ExpressCard 34 FW or eSATA card and an external HDD for media.
That creates independent FW buses if you go that route or a FW bus and a eSATA HDD connection.

Optimal Settings for Distance

I'm sure this has been covered, but what are the idea settings for my Airport Extreme when it comes to distance?
I can't move my router any closer to my bedroom than it already is, and the signal dies right at the foot of my bed. So all I need is about 8 more feet.
Would 2.4 vs 5Ghz help? WPA2 vs WEP? Multicast rate? N vs n/b/g compatible? Interface robustness?
Thanks in advance.

As you can imagine, it's impossible to predict performance in advance without knowing volumes about the construction of your home, construction materials, carpet, furniture and a million other things. Even then, the prediction would probably be wrong.
2.4 GHz signals travel better than 5 GHz signals, so try the 2.4 Ghz band. And, perhaps surprisingly, "g" signals travel and penetrate better than "n". So, for maximum distance and penetration, try 802.11 b/g or 802.11 g.
It sounds like you really need a device like an AirPort Express to "extend" your wireless signal from the AirPort Extreme. Ideally, the Express would be located 1/2 to 2/3 of the distance between your AirPort Extreme and the area that you want to "extend".

Optimal settings for h.264

Does anyone have any recommended optimal setting for encoding DV footage to h.264 at full 720x480 resolution? I need setting that will provide quality with the smallest file size. Thanks.

Does anyone have any recommended optimal setting for encoding DV footage to h.264 at full 720x480 resolution? I need setting that will provide quality with the smallest file size.You can try the "Movie to iPod" conversion export. This will produce a 640 x 480 (the "square" pixel representation of your 720 x 480 DV "rectangular" pixel movie) in the H.264 "LC" profile at roughly 12+ MBs per minute (i.e., roughly 1630 Kbps). If lower data rates are required and the movie does not need to be iPod compatible, you can use the H.264 "Main" profile in either the "Movie to H.264" or "Movie to MPEG-4" manual export options to limit the data rate to as low a level as you can tolerate in terms of playback "quality."

Optimal settings for export from 1080p camcorder - Canon HF100

I just bought an HF100 camcorder. When I make projects with iMovie what are best export settings for 1080p projects? What about for 480p for a DVD. I tried to export 1080p video and it looks grainy. I'm not sure if this is the fault of the camera or iMovie?
Also, when I play clips inside imovie the playback is choppy. Is there anyway to fix this?

I'm using a HF10, and I don't think iMovie '08 properly detects that 1080p recordings from these camcorders are progressive scan, but rather treats then like 1080i clips. I find I get better results by recording in the default 1080i if there's sideways motion in the video. That doesn't really surprise me - according to the AVCHD consortium website, there's no such thing as 1080p in AVCHD (see http://www.avchd-info.org/format/index.html).
DVDs are always interlaced anyway, so for best results you want to start with 1080i and not 1080p. I export at 960x540i, using the Quicktime export option selecting "High" quality mode. The default "Large" sharing option in iMovie uses a bitrate that I find too low for getting the best quality.
When you export at 1080p, what is your bitrate set to? That makes a lot of difference.
Finally, 1080p playback is very hard work for your computer. Try quitting other applications before playing back your video to get a smooth experience. Or export at 540p.

Optimal settings for AP1242AG with roaming

Hello everybody, I need some advice on the best settings for my AP1242AG wireless radios. I am using 2.4Ghz and not 5. They are not lightweight and therefore I do not have a WLC. I have only hooked up the right (primary) antenna on them. I have 6 radios in an outdoor deployment, they have line of sight and are only about 500 feet away from each other so signal should not be an issue. I have already established communication between two of the units successfully as a test so I am mostly there.
However, I need help with the role in radio settings. 3 of the radios are mounted throughout a jobsite on poles so they are my main AP's. The other 3 radios are in motorhomes that move around inside of the yard from time to time. Therefore, this is similar to a multipoint to multipoint bridge configuration. Each of the 3 main units on the poles have a connection back to the main LAN and I am simply trying to get the LAN connectivity into each of the three motorhomes (so I don't believe I need to use any of the repeater options and this is similar to a bridge). I don't know the best role in radio selection for this configuration that will allow everything to work together the best. I also need the 3 remote radios to roam from one pole to the next as needed for strongest signal.
Also, if anybody has additional advice on other settings I may want to change given my setup to help optimize, I would appreciate it. I am obviously new to these units.
Can somebody please help with this? Thanks in advance!

APs on poles : station-role root
APs on motorhomes : station-role workgroup-bridge
The workgroup bridge role allows to act as client, provide connectivity to whatever is connected on the wired interface of the WGB and also to roam.
500 feet is a lot for 1242 with omnidirectionnal antennas (I suppose this is what you have since you're roaming around). I hope you tested it :-)

DVD Studio Pro: Optimal Settings for 16:9 SDV Streaming?

Hi folks!
Gotta question about video streaming rates and DVD authoring.
I understand, mainly from reading the forums, that jacking up the streaming bit rate for video makes a nicer quality image on the DVD, but it does so at the cost of compatibility with lower end or older DVD players. Understood.
However, I am a beginner so I have no idea what streaming rate to use (I think Apple suggests about 6). It's no good testing with my DVD player because I have a BlueRay player that seems to work with 7 (mbps?) just fine.
My project is being shot at 16:9 Standard DV format and edited in a 24p timeline. I'm looking to make a native 24p DVD at 16:9, SDV, non interlaced.
Does anyone have an "optimal" or "preferred" bit rate for streaming with this kind of format?
Any suggestions?
Thanks!

Mike,
Definitely planning on DVD5 for the compatibility reason you mentioned and also because they are a heck of a lot cheaper to work with.
So, I did a burn of a 45 minute video, but set the average bit rate to 3.2 (gave me 130 minutes on DVD5) and I'm plenty happy with the resolution, and output file for video was 1.2GB or so. (I only had audio on select shots) It's mainly the other number, the max bit rate, that I'm not sure what to set it to.
Should I go for 8 for the max bit rate, or go more conservative at 7 for compatibility? Lower?
Let's put it this way:
This is for my "demo reel" and it has to look good, but more importantly it absolutely has to work with an average DVD player. I'm mainly concerned about max number over quality (average) number because I don't want to send a disc to someone (for business purposes) and then have it not play. If it doesn't play, I'm not only going to look like an ***, but if I only have one shot to get some financial backing for a project... well you get the picture.
Thanks again, (both of you guys)!
PS: I won't hold anyone but myself accountable, so no worries, I just want to get a feel for what you would be "comfortable" with that type of situation.

Optimal settings for 9800 PRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for