Optimizer_feature greater that compatible

Hi,
I came across a database with optimizer_feature_enabled = 11.2.0.2 and compatible = 10.2.0.4
Will this even work?
When I've ever used optimizer_feature_enabled I've always had compatible greater then optimizer_feature_enabled.
The reason why I ask this question is that I have two test databases witch is configured differently one with compatible and optimizer_feature_enabled the same and one with optimizer_feature_enabled greater then compatible. There has been reports of better performence on the database with lower compatible.
Regards

>
I came across a database with optimizer_feature_enabled = 11.2.0.2 and compatible = 10.2.0.4
Will this even work?
>
As Srini said - yes - it will work.
Whether you want to have this mismatch depends on your use case.
You may now (with 11.2.0.2) be using optimization that isn't available in the 10.2 version and that can be good or bad depending on the queries that you use.
When a database is upgraded the 'optimizer_feature_enabled' parameter will default to the value for the new DB version. Many organizations will perform an upgrade but use settings for both parameters for the older DB version to try to minimize unexpected issues and problems.
Then when things seem to run ok the 'compatible' flag will be changed to the new DB version and they will be looking for any problems that are introduced by doing that.
The same thing applies to the optimizer parameter. Whenever you change either parameter you should have a 'rollback' plan in place in case unexpected issues arise. That means only changing them after you have a known, good backup for recovery.

Similar Messages

I have a Canon Vixia HV30 and would like to know if I can transfer video from it to a new MacBook Pro? The camcorder has a HDV/DV output. Is that compatible with firewire?

I have a Canon Vixia HV30 and would like to know if I can transfer video from it to a new MacBook Pro? The camcorder has a HDV/DV output. Is that compatible with firewire?

Hi Codye24
I don't know if you saw this thread
Connecting a Canon HV30 camcorder vai a thunderbolt port to a new imac
Hope that this helps
Kevin

I have a mac os x version 10.6.8 is that compatible with CC? koz i cant download it

i have a mac os x version 10.6.8 is that compatible with CC? koz i cant download it & it tell me: You are running an operating system that Photoshop no longer supports. Refer to the system requirements for a full list of supported platforms.

If you look thru the requirements for the applications you are likely to find 10.6 does not meet the tech specs.
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/system-requirements.html#System requirements

I want to search a few add ons that compatible with Mozilla Firefox version 2.0.

want to search a few add ons that compatible with Mozilla Firefox version 2.0.
why can I no longer search it with this URL https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/advancedsearh,
pls give me a clue, so I can search the add ons that compatible with my earlier firefox
Regards
Goerchka

Correct the spelling of search on your link to
:https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/advancedsearch
:and it would appear that the search would work, use the little dropdown underneath the big green arrow to actually pull up the advanced search you asked for, and it appears to work, I didn't actually bring up any of the results.

Find some apps thats compatible with 4.2.1 IOs?

Hi! Plz tell me how can i find some apps thats compatible with 4.2.1 IOs? Some kind of sort or something?

HT4208 games and apps for ios 4.2.1: Apple Support Communities

What is the best outdoor AP that compatible with the WLC 5508?

Dear All,
hope my email finds you well
i'm searching for the bes Wireless Outdoor AP that is compatible with WLC 5508 (has a lightweight Image)?
I used befor the 1310 LAP but it was nightmare to me, so I do not like to use it again and i'm searching for the new generation of the outdoor,
many thanks in advance,
Ahmed

Can you give us more information about what you are planning to do? The latest outdoor WAP is the 1550 but it's MESH.
Otherwise, you can use the 3500, 3600 or the 1260.

Flash Player version 11.9.900.170, is that compatible

Hi,
I have downloaded and installed the FP version 10.1.
After reboot, safari opened the adobe FP site, and it showing the following, please see the image below. The image telling me to download the latest version 11.9. What to do?
I am using MB, system information as follows-
Model Name:                      MacBook
Model Identifier:                  MacBook2,1
Processor Name:                Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed:               2 GHz
Number Of Processors:       1
Total Number Of Cores:       2
L2 Cache (per processor):    4 MB
Memory:                             1 GB
Bus Speed:                         667 MHz
Safari:
Version:                   3.0.4
Last Modified:          12/13/13 10:27 PM
Kind:                        Universal
Get Info String:         4.1.3, Copyright © 2003-2010 Apple Inc.
Location:                  /Applications/Safari.app
Adobe Flash Player Install Manager:
Version:               10.1.102.64
Last Modified:       12/20/13 1:49 PM
Shall i download as per the above image? Is 11.9 compatible with my MB?
Please let me know?
Have a good day.

Hi Mende 1,
Thanks for your reply.
That is why, i downloaded 10.1. But then the flash player site telling me to upgrade- i hope you seen the image, not so clear though.
So, it is better to overlook that message and i should not download that version, right?
Actually i don't want the troublesome version for my MB, it is already pretty old.
I would appreciate if you let me know bit more insight about the image i posted in.
Have a good day.

Need a great mac compatible DVD-BluRay burner

I have a late 2011 iMac, 32 GB memory, with a LaCie 4tb external thunderbolt hd. I burned finished DVD's on the mac's 'super drive' or whatever it's called, but I can only burn regular DVD's that won't hold more than 45 minutes or so of any quality, plus the peeps said some wouldn't play on their t.v.. I need to purchase a DVD (bluRay also would be great) burner that can burn layers or large files with high quality and dependability. Also, I purchased a quikie el cheapo DVD creator for menu's because I don't need the complications right now of big programs, but am wondering if it really matters what authoring/burning program you use (please say no). It would seem that if I export my files in the proper format for DVD or BlueRay, the quality should transfer? (Shouldn't the NTSC,H.S64, AAC 48kHz do for DVD, or H.264 Blue-ray 1080i 29.97 format options as supplied in PP work?) Learning, ever learning.
Thanks much in advance.

nadinefromwa wrote:
I have mixed HD (Panasonic P2 cards) and SD media in my sequences, so I need to stay with MPEG-2 until I get to the point of all HD content then.
If you are mixing HD and SD footage it is best to stay in an SD sequence (unless you absolutely must go HD for some reason) and author a regular DVD. If you up-scale SD content to HD you will loose quality.
nadinefromwa wrote:
I, for some reason, thought the faster the burn the better the quality but not so. I will stay slow. And the bitrate has always been a mystery to me. It seems like if I leave everything at the default in PP and Encore, I'll be okay.
The burn speed itself has nothing to do with the video quality of the final DVD. Lower burn speed simply means that will avoid write errors during the burn process. The video quality is determined by your encoder settings; The bitrate in general should not exceed 7.5 mb/s and you should use a constant bitrate for content under 60 min and variable bitrate for longer videos. Adobe Media Encoder certainly has more settings but I'm not that familiar with this particular piece of software.
nadinefromwa wrote:
One question - I found I could bring in my mxf files and size them to fit the frame in premier pro with the SD footage. Do you think that would create an issue for the final product? (Although I didn't do that on the previous DVD's that didn't work) I haven't attempted a burn yet from this mixed bag.
You would be better off asking Adobe-specific questions either in the Adobe forums or maybe over on the COW. I personally have very little experience with either Encore or Premiere Pro.
As is the case with most authoring software Encore will create DVD Images that can be played on your machine prior to burning. That means you can do tests to try out your workflows and settings without having to physically burn a DVD.
http://helpx.adobe.com/encore/using/building-finished-project.html
nadinefromwa wrote:
Also then, it sounds like I shouldn't need to worry about the new burner until I reach the point of wanting to burn bluray? The iMac super drive should be fine for the regular DVD's for now?
Absolutely. Blu-ray is for HD and DVD is for SD.

It is great that muse lets me design without code; it'd be better if I could install it to my comput

Wow, you graphics and promotional emails look fantastic. I am really curious about Muse. What a great promise. I hope I get to use it at some point. After almost two hours of computer efforts to install this magestic breakthrough cloud software, here I am... looking at the candy store window...
Also, I hope I get my computer tip top as it was before I gave in to temptation

I am sorry for the previous sarcasm, but I was very frustrated. I held myself, but the problematic install continued.
The most aggravating factor of this scenario is that you are promoting Muse as no need to be technical, but just to install it, I've had to look for answer in forums, install, uninstall, use Cloud clear software, restore points, etc. The get go to get muse requires the patience and attention that a technical person has. Is this not a terrible opening for the experience?
I finally got it installed, and I look forward to playing with it.

WPF, Expression Encoder and Window 8+, is that compatible ?

Hi,
we would like to implement whtat it says in the article:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/285964/WPF-Webcam-Control
any one knows if this is comatible with Windows 8 +, since the new windows is not compatible with Direct X. Is this artcile is a long terme solotion ?
Thank you !

That doesn't appear to be a US model, and this is the forums for Toshiba USA. You may want to contact Toshiba in your region.
- Peter

Is my lenovo that compatible with hp printer 3070a

bought a lenovo t410 and wondered if my hp printer wiull be compatible
hp desktop 3070a ?

viviennegb3014
Welcome to the HP Community Forum.
Perhaps -- if this is your printer, then there is Full Feature Software for it and that is always a good sign.
HP Deskjet 3070A e-All-in-One Printer - B611a Drivers
A bit more detail on how to install printer software is included in this document:
Install Full Feature Software – Printer
Click the Kudos Thumbs-Up to show you appreciate the help.
Click Accept as Solution when the Answer provides a Fix or Workaround!
I am pleased to provide assistance on behalf of HP. I do not work for HP.
Kind Regards,
Dragon-Fur

Media Encoder Greater that 7.0 does not recongnise SD footage with correct pixel aspect ratio

Hello,
I logged this bug with Adobe last year but even through the latest releases the bug still remains and is a real issue for anyone editing in SD via Premiere Pro CC.
Effectvely when you create a PAL sequence within Premiere Pro CC using SD 720x576 pixels (4:3) you have 2 options to export, either Queue or Export. If you export the footage directly from the PP application to MPEG2 SD then the resulting files are perfect, however if you use the queue option and send it to Media Encoder then the resulting files are incorrectly interpreted and the resulting file looks squashed. I suspect the Media Encoder is defaulting to Square pixels and not 1.09xx which is the default for PAL SD 4:3
The issue only started on Media Encoder version 7.1 but I also checked 7.2 and this still has the bug.
I can't believe this is not effecting a lot of people and its taking so long to resolve. Adobe at the time acknowledged the issue but did not provide a time scale to fix.
If anyone has any words of wisdom I would love to hear from you. Maybe I am missing a simple workaround ?? Which could be to just export and NOT queue, however because I use the batch function a lot this is not always viable.
thanks
Steve

Hi Tom,
thanks for the quick response. I'll attach two screenshots -- one from PP and one from AME, both showing the same test chart, but distorted in AME.
Basically the given parameters are:
Sequence is D1/DV PAL, 720x576, PAR 1.0940, framerate 25
Export settings are: MXF OP1a, resolution + framerate same as sequence, IMX 50 PAL.
If you still require the preset file, I'll send that separately.
all the best
Daniel

External keyboard that compatible with mac

I'm using macbook pro 13 inch with mountain lion installed in it. I want to use external keyboard because i want to keep a distance between my eyes and the screen. But i want a wired keyboard, and for me I will not choosing wireless keyboard because it use some batteries. Also sometime the bluetooth connection not so good (in some cases i read in the review). I know that apple has its own keyboard but for me the price still expensive for a wired keyboard. So, what is the keyboard that suite with mac? Is it all keyboard including windows type keyboard? Any cheap keyboard compared to apple's one?

Jill,
Boy you hit an old thread. I don't know that zikeryn is still around, so I'll throw my thoughts in here. My first Apple USB Extended keyboard lasted about 1 1/2 years - and the I (stupidly) tried to clean it with a very moist (read WET) micro-fiber cloth and got liquid in the keyboard. My bad, so I can't blame the keyboard. I rushed right out (to Amazon) and purchased another. I love this keyboard - I was lost when I had to go back to using my built-in keyboard. It's sturdy like a brick - it just doesn't like water!
I would urge you to go for it - unlike third-party keyboards that may have drivers, System Preference panes, etc., this on just, as I said, WORKS.
Good luck,
Clinton

If cisco "openh264 video codec" is so great that Mozilla packages it automatically, why is it disabled (Never Activate) as an Add-on?

It seems that every software manufacturer has to write a plethora of little gimmicks into their installation and setup files that loads trash onto my computer. I'm not talking about programs like _Chrome_, that gives me a chance to decline. I'm talking about programs that surreptitiously add basically worthless entries to nearly every accessible niche on the system. And fails to remove anything from the registry upon uninstallation. So, as a matter of operating policy I routinely uninstall programs I never use, turn off services I never use, delete startup entries I never use... (I will not openly admit to my forays into Windows' Registry for fear of being bedeviled by another round of "party policy" alarmisms against it.) Do you get the picture? Hence my question. Before I nuke it too.

hello Stan_Schultz, cisco's openh264 codec would be a part of the browser itself (in order to enable webrtc video conversations), however for licensing purposes mozilla cannot distribute it directly - that's why it is provided in this form as a plugin. i have never seen it disabled by default though...
for more details about this issue, you could also refer to this blog post: http://andreasgal.com/2014/10/14/openh264-now-in-firefox/

Drive space usage is greater that sum of folder space

I just created a new boot disk and then restored files from Time Machine. didn't restore everything, which would have amounted to about 248 GB. But when I look at the information (Get Info) for the drive under Devices is is currently showing that the space being used is 334,733,254,656 bytes (334.73 GB on disk)
I checked the information for each of the folders and files in the root directory and the sum of there usage is roughly 90 GB:
Applications
18,903,169,688 bytes (19.84 GB on disk) for 21,428 items
Developer
15,963,571,487 bytes (16.55 GB on disk) for 160,773 items
Users
12,062,054,006 bytes (12.17 GB on disk) for 20,478 items
Library
9,983,670,968 bytes (10.39 GB on disk) for 99,598 items
System
5,487,399,383 bytes (5.93 GB on disk) for 97,334 items
MSI
3,576,714,672 bytes (3.59 GB on disk) for 8,106 items
private
5,261,118,622 bytes (5.26 GB on disk) for 1,077 items
lost+found
4,050,591,911 bytes (4.05 GB on disk) for 2 items
The other folders don't show much usage.
I restarted the computer and it still shows the same thing.
I'm skeptical about the 334GB. What can I do to find out what's right and reconcile it if there is an error?

See my FAQ*:
http://www.macmaps.com/diskfull.html

Optimizer_feature greater that compatible

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for