Optional With holding tax for a vendor

Dear All,
I want to make the with holding tax optional during MIRO.
I have already assign the tax code in vendor master and so it automatically deduct withholding tax.
But my vendor is a supplier as well as a broker for me. So when i want to pay him Brokerage I want automatic tax deduction which is happening but when i want to pay him for the material which he supplied to me also the tax get automatically deducted.
Can any body help me on this?
Thanks & Regards,
Rakesh

Hi Milind
Appreciate your prompt response, I am looking for information on what needs to be done for implementing with holding tax for Puerto Rico, May be I was wrong when I said I could not find any links on this subject either in SAP Help or else where. What I could not find was Information specific to Puerto Rico withholding tax. We normally have lots of information on WithHolding tax in SAP help and else where on the net.
I am looking for information specific to WithHolding tax for Puerto Rico.
Regards
KIM Khan

Similar Messages

How to calculate with holding tax for the open item

Dera all,
Can you tel me how to simulate with holding tax for the open item? i will try do it using FI_WT_F110_CALCULATE FM but it dosnt work. plz help me
regard
nawa

Hi Sushil,
can you please elaborate on how you resolved it. we are facing the same issue with BAPI not calculating the withholding tax data.
Thanks,
Sanket

Change with holding tax for vendor

Hi all,
I have a requirement of chnaging withholding tax for exisitng vendor. Is it possible to achive this using any function module or BAPI and ateast by BDC or LSMW ??
Best suggestions will be rewarded with points.
Sivaprasad

Hi Sivaprsad,
You can change the with holding tax data by using BDC. because, it having table control, so it's easy to update code in BDC.
Hope, it will help you.
Thanks,
Poonam.

With holding tax amount in vendor line lay out

Hi Experts,
I have posted an invoice in MIRO. After posting the document when I check the wittholding tax data tab in MIRO screen the w/tax base amt (WT_QSSHB & WT_QSSHH) and Wh tax amount (WT_QBSHB & WT_QBSHH) field has no value. TDS Deducted and posted. But the same fileds has values in data entry view screen when selecting the "display withholding information" in vendor account . This problem is only for MIRO entries. Because of this i am unable to bring the WHT tax amount in vendor line layout.
Kindly advise why no wtax amount was shown in the field 'w/tax column' even if the vendor is liable to tax.
With regards
RSS.

Dear All,
this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

With holding Tax for Interested paid to bank

Dear Gurus,
User making payment to bank ( which include interest), he want to withheld TDS @22.44% on interest amount.
How we can map into SAP.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
First you have to create the withholding tax type i think 194a, after that create the withholding tax key Rate, then you will link up the withholding tax type and keys.
you will goto this path Spro>Financial Accounting Global settings>Withholding tax>Withholding tax>Withholding tax.
in this path you will maintain all the properties.
it is helpful give me reward points
Thanks
gvr

Calculation of with holding tax

The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards.

India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval

Dear All
Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
(ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
Regards
Anilkumar

Please go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement

Change With Holding Tac code in Vendor Master in Mass

Hi Experts,
How I can change With Holding Tax code in Vendor master in Mass. Please let me know which transaction code or path I use.
Thanks & Regards,
Hemant Maurya

Hi :
There should be a couple of ways to finish it,and the easiest way is to execute transaction xk99,and then select the table lfbw,then click field tab,then look for W/tax code (LFBW-WT_WITHCD),then execute,here you need to input the vendor numbers and then you will go the screen to enter the new value to cover the old one,
Another way is to lsmw.

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001

Hi Guru's,
I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
"With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
Regards
Maruthi.

Thanks for all,
MY problem solved.
Regards
Maruthi

How to caculate with holding tax using vendor number

Dear All,
I need to calculate and simulate the with holding tax amount before the FI document post. input should be the vendor number fisical year and the company code and the with hoding tax base abount. plz help me to do this
regard
nawa

Hello,
For a record in BBSEG you can have multiple records in the data file which corresponds to Structure BWITH which allows more than one value for field WT_WITHCD. For ex:
BBKPF
Field1      Field2
a     bb
x     yy
BBSEG
Field1      Field2     Field3
a     bb     ccc
x     yy     zzz
BWITH
Field1      Field2     Field3     WT_WITHCD
a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD1
a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD2
a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD3
x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD7
x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD8
x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD9
Hope this gives you some help to proceed further.
Best Regards, Murugesh AS

Regarding the Grossing up Method for With holding Tax

Hi
I am implementing SAP ECC 6.0. I am having a specific requirement with regard to With holding TAX. If i configure the WT, the tax amount will be deducted from the invoice & posted to a separate GL account. But in My case, the WT amount should be posted to a GL Account and the amount should not be deducted from the vendor account.
This arises in case of foreign payments

Try following this guide for Defining Withholding Tax Formulas
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/7b/5d823ae35c3769e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
and this one Defining Withholding Tax Types and Withholding Tax Codes
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/8e/5a823a89569e68e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
This may help you!

With holding tax code for posting while caluclation step

Hello gurus,
can you let me know in the configuring check boxes what i have missed out,
while posting vendor invoice i am not able to get the tax amount and net invoice amount.
thanks
Pranam

hi,
check in your config if u have put tick mark under the tab With holding tax posting i.e posting with payment.
this will make you to calculate and post the tax amount during payment.
thanks
G.Bharathi

OBWW - Define Accounts for With Holding Tax to be paid over

Hi All
I am unable to activate Rules and assign accounts in TCode OBWW (Define accounts for with holding tax to be paid over) as the screen is greyed out.
Please guide me
Rgds
KIM Khan

Hi
You may in the same screen in another window.
Regards
Murad

How to creat the Varient for 1099MISC With Holding Tax

How to create the Variant for 1099MISC With Holding Tax ?

HI,
please follow the below steps to create variant at report.
tcode se38
report RFIDYYWT
pass all the parameters
press save icon
give variant name
retrive the variant in report
tcode se38
report name RFIDYYWT
press : shift + F5
or get varinat icon.
I hope above will resolve your issue.
Regards
Madhu M

Optional With holding tax for a vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for