ORA-01630: max # extents (505) reached in temp segment in tablespace
I have a problem, in creating a index with error ORA-01630: max # extents (505) reached in temp segment in tablespace.
can you any please help me on this , what could be the best steps can be taken to fix the issue.
I increased the TBS size (I have more than 6 Gb free space), verified the max extents and min extents but didn't get clear idea.
SQL> show user
USER is "APPS"
SQL> create index xyz.xygts_mtl_trx_source_idx on mtl_material_transactions(trx_source_line_id);
create index xyz.xygts_mtl_trx_source_idx on mtl_material_transactions(trx_source_line_id)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01630: max # extents (505) reached in temp segment in tablespace
XY_DATA
SQL> select BYTES/1024/1024 from dba_segments where SEGMENT_NAME='MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS';
BYTES/1024/1024
10510
-- Verified the pctincrease value
SQL> select TABLESPACE_NAME,INITIAL_EXTENT,NEXT_EXTENT,MAX_EXTENTS,PCT_INCREASE from dba_tablespaces where TABLESPACE_NAME='XYZ_DATA';
TABLESPACE_NAME INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT MAX_EXTENTS
PCT_INCREASE
XYZ_DATA 40960 40960 505
0
Thanks,
Venkat
Pl see
How to Diagnose and Resolve ORA-1628, ORA-1630, ORA-1631, ORA-1632, ORA-1684 : max # of extents <num> reached in < OBJECT > [ID 1025581.6]
Overview Of ORA-01630 Max # Extents(%) reached in temp segment in tablespace % [ID 260944.1]
HTH
Srini
Similar Messages
-
ORA-01630: max # extents (2) reached in temp segment in tablespace USERS
Hi all,
I got the error when I created CLUSTER
ORA-01630: max # extents (2) reached in temp segment in tablespace USERS
CREATE CLUSTER trial_cluster (trialno NUMBER(5,0))
PCTUSED 80
PCTFREE 5
TABLESPACE users
STORAGE (INITIAL 250K NEXT 50K
MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2
PCTINCREASE 0)
HASH IS trialno HASHKEYS 150;
And I increased maxextents to 20480
alter tablespace users default storage(MAXEXTENTS 20480)
same error happens.Here is one example from Metalink note:
create tablespace dropme datafile 'dropme.dbf' size 200m
extent management dictionary
default storage (initial 100k next 100k maxextents unlimited pctincrease 0);
SQL> create index myind on mytab (object_name)
2 storage ( initial 16k next 16k maxextents 3 pctincrease 0)
3 tablespace dropme;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01630: max # extents (3) reached in temp segment in tablespace DROPME -
Platform: RHEL 4u5
Application: 11.5.10.2
Database: 10.2.0.4
2-node Installation as follows:
1 Node for DB and Concurrent
1 Node for Apps.
We anabled OWF Mailer services on 2nd Sept, and on 5th Sep we started receiving following error messages in our DB alert log contnuously:
ORA-1631: max # extents 505 reached in table APPLSYS.WF_NOTIFICATION_IN
So, we stopped the OWF Mailer servcies and Agent Listeners.
Got a metalink note 152475.1 but confused to alter the table definition as I am of the view that these Oracle Workflow related tables are Oracle Built-in Objects not the custom one.
So, will it be ok to increase the Maxextents for this table?911748 wrote:
Hi Asif,
We have actually implemented it on Production now. We just tested the mailer configuration on TEST and when users give go ahead after they tested their scenarios we implemented the same on Production. Can I implement the extents increment activity on production?
Yes you can.
Thanks,
Hussein -
ORA-01631: max # extents (121) reached!!!
Please review the following DML and error in response of that command:
insert into dtcn (area_code, cons_code, dcdat) values(12,12,sysdate);
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01631: max # extents (121) reached in table MNBSYS.DTCN
There are only two such tables DTCN and DTCN_HISTORY in which we are unable to insert any record because of above error. Following are some reference information of these tables:
PCT_FREE: 10, PCT_USED: 40 INITIAL_EXTENT: 5242880,
NEXT_EXTENT: 10240, MIN_EXTENTS: 1, MAX_EXTENTS: 121,
PCT_INCREASE: 0, FREELIST: 1, TABLESPACE_NAME: MNB_DATA,
DBUSERNAME: MNBSYS
It may also be noted that the above statistics are exactly same for number of tables but we are facing the problem with only these two tables. Kindly advise what could be the problem and how can I overcome this...
Thanks in anticipation...
Zia ShareefHi,
This error comes when table reach to his max extents,here table extend upto 121 extents that is his max value so now you have to increase the value of maxextents.
by
SQL> alter table <table_name> storage(maxextents unlimited);
**also set the value of nextextent parameter because currently its define by very low value of 10240
Kuljeet -
ORA-01631: max # extents (4096)
Hi
I received below ORA error for one of my prod table, would like to in which scenario we get the below error and how to investigate why it has occured.
ORA-01631: max # extents (4096) reached in table DWHSE.F_APS_ORDERS
RegardsTo hit a maximum extents error on a table you pretty much have to be using dictionary tablespace management. The maximum number of extents defaults based on the block size. If your Oracle version is 8.1 and up all your tablespaces should have been rebuilt as locally managed tablespaces using either auto-allocate or uniform extents. In the case where you have a newer version you should consider creating new tablespaces and moving the objects into them so you can take advantage of modern extent management features.
If you are running an older release then just take some time to review your object allocation layout to see if for space managment purposes you need to do any re-arranging or storage parameter modification. We used our own version of auto-allocate under 7.x where we had 4 different extent sizes for smaller objects where each size was an even multiple of the smaller sizes. For moderate size and large tables we had uniform extent sizes.
Good luck.
HTH -- Mark D Powell -- -
ORA-1631: max # extents 4096
Hi
I received below ORA error for one of my prod table, would like to in which scenario we get the below error and how to investigate why it has occured.
ORA-1631: max # extents 4096 reached in table.......
RegardsAnd what does this database error have in common with Oracle Object and Object Relational concepts, that are the subject matter of this forum?
Please select the appropriate forum to ask your questions - in this, find the Oracle Database > Database - General forum - and close your thread here. -
ORA-01693-Max extents reached in lobsegment
Hi
getting this error in our alert log file
ORA-01693-Max extents <> reached in lobsegment <name>
Can any tell me how to increase (alter) logsegment
Thanks
Bhanualter table <table> modify lob (<lobcolumn>) (storage (maxextents unlimited))
will work -
Hi Team,
We are getting ora-1632, max extents error's.. suggest ---what all can be done..
and in future how to avoid it...Seems your index extent has reached its max limit, try and see if the issue resolves and always post full error instead of just error no.
ALTER INDEX <object_owner>.<index_name> STORAGE ( MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED);
Edited by: Veeresh.S on Oct 22, 2012 6:53 PM -
ORA-1631: max # extents reached in table INFILES
Dear friends
kindly give me the answer weather I am correct/wrong?
Solution i have given is
Alter table <tablename>
storage(maxextents unlimited)
SrinivasBefore changing the table to allow an unlimited number of extents I would 1- verify that the table size is in line with its design usage and 2- that the program in question is not doing something stupid. If both of these are OK, and most of the time they will not be the problem, then you might also consider resizing the object since dictionary space management is in use.
HTH -- Mark D Powell -- -
When I execute this query in Oracle 8i Database.
SQL> create table MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS_bak as select * from MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS;
create table MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS_bak as select * from MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01630: max # extents (505) reached in temp segment in tablespace APPLSYSD
then Shall I use the following command Without shutting down the database. Is there any other solutions.
Please reply.
alter tablespace APPLSYSD default storage (maxextents unlimited);
OR
alter tablespace APPLSYSD storage (maxextents unlimited);Hi user13098327,
Please read below thread;
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:956629961318 -
System maximum max extents....
Hi,
I need a clarification about the System maximum max extents...
The oracle doc "Error messages" about The error code and message "ORA-01631: max # extents (string) reached in table string.string" points out as action:
"If maxextents is less than the system maximum, raise it. Otherwise, you must recreate with larger initial, next or pctincrease params"
Which is the system maximum max. extents...??? Is this of database block size???
Thanks you,
Simsgalaxy wrote:
Hi,
I need a clarification about the System maximum max extents...
The oracle doc "Error messages" about The error code and message "ORA-01631: max # extents (string) reached in table string.string" points out as action:
"If maxextents is less than the system maximum, raise it. Otherwise, you must recreate with larger initial, next or pctincrease params"
Which version of Oracle are you on ? I don't think maxextents has been a problem since 9i.
In the days when "unlimited extents" had not been introduced and the entire extent map had to fit in the segment header the size of a segment map entry dictated the number of extents that could be listed, so the block size made a big difference. The maximum roughly doubled as you doubled the size of the block. From memory - 2KB blocks gave 121 extents, 4KB gave 248, 8KB gave 505 and 16KB gave 1016 - I don't have any memory of a figure for 32KB blocks.
But from 9i (at least 9.2) Oracle ignores any maxextents setting you put into the table storage clause and uses "unlimited".
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert"
Arthur C. Clarke -
Hi,
I am having problems with the max # extents being exceeded.
I am creating a spatial index using the following script:
CREATE INDEX GIS.MYTABLE_SX ON
GIS.MYTABLE(GEOMETRY)
indextype is MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX
parameters ( 'SDO_LEVEL=6,
SDO_NUMTILES = 8,
SDO_COMMIT_INTERVAL = 1000,
TABLESPACE = GISI,
INITIAL = 131072,
NEXT = 131072,
PCTINCREASE = 0,
MINEXTENTS = 1,
MAXEXTENTS = 2147483645,
BTREE_INITIAL = 512K,
BTREE_NEXT = 512K,
BTREE_PCTINCREASE = 0')
This in turn creates the table
MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$
and
the indexes
MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$_B1
(x4 - one for each field SDO_GROUPCODE, SDO_CODE, SDO_STATUS, SDO_ROWID)
and
MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$_B2
(x1 one for SDO_ROWID)
using the following script:
DROP TABLE MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$ CASCADE CONSTRAINTS ;
CREATE TABLE MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$ (
SDO_GROUPCODE RAW (14),
SDO_ROWID ROWID,
SDO_CODE RAW (14),
SDO_STATUS VARCHAR2 (1))
TABLESPACE GISI
PCTFREE 10
PCTUSED 40
INITRANS 1
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 131072
NEXT 131072
PCTINCREASE 0
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 )
NOCACHE;
CREATE INDEX MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$_B1 ON
"GIS".MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$(SDO_GROUPCODE, SDO_CODE, SDO_ROWID, SDO_STATUS)
TABLESPACE GISI PCTFREE 10 STORAGE(INITIAL 524288 NEXT 524288 PCTINCREASE 0 )
CREATE INDEX MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$_B2 ON
"GIS".MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$(SDO_ROWID)
TABLESPACE GISI PCTFREE 10 STORAGE(INITIAL 524288 NEXT 524288 PCTINCREASE 0 )
The problem is when you create a spatial index using the top script the max # extents do not get applied to
MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$_B1
and
MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$_B2
Instead these tables take on the default max # extents set on the tablespace.
How do I set the max # extents for indexes
MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$_B1
and
MYTABLE_SX_HL6N8$_B2
to MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 for example. I am aware that this is not good practice but I would like to know if it is possible. Is it a spatial issue? I have tried to increase the size of
the BTREE_INITIAL and BTREE_NEXT to 512K from 128K but it still complains about max # extents (999) reached. A way round it is obviously to increase the default max # extents on the tablespace but that requires DBA intervention. I would like to know how one can do this programatically using the top script or something similar.
Thanks
Regards
StephenHi Stephen,
A few thoughts:
Oracle has pretty much dropped hybrid indexing in terms of it being
a generically useful way to index data. As of 9.0.1.2 the suggestion
is to use R-tree indexes unless there is something about your
workload or data set that makes the use of R-trees bad.
If you don't use R-tree indexing, then stick with fixed indexing. The
original idea of hybrid indexing was to allow better approximations
of geometries without the index growing too large, but it turns out the
SQL index query within spatial took longer than anticipated.
In terms of setting up the spatial index, when creating a quadtree index
you can specify the btree_initial and btree_next in the parameters clause
of the create index statement, which allows you to adjust the btree indexing
parameters as you noted, but there is no way to set the max number of
extents (or in fact the tablespace used for the b-tree indexes).
When you need that control, you need to to have dba intervention to set the
default tablespace and parameters at the user level before creating the spatial
index. The parameters in the parameters clause can set up the index table
parameters, and the default parameters can be used for the btree indexes.
regards,
dan -
Why am i getting this error in a select statement which does not even use a temporary table of any kind?
unable to extend temp segment in tablespace TEMPI find that the following sql tells me what is being sorted and what is being copied to the datafiles. I can use is and see if a sort is being done in memory because it will not generate a temp segment on disk:
set pages 50
set heading on
set wrap off
column username format a15
column tablespace format a10
column user format a10
column meg format a7
column sid format 999999
set lines 90
set feedback on
select s.sid,s.username, u."USER", u.tablespace, u.contents, u.extents, u.blocks
from sys.v_$session s, sys.v_$sort_usage u
where s.saddr = u.session_addr;
select s.osuser, s.sid, s.username, s.serial#,
sum(u.blocks)*vp.value/1024/1024 sort_size_IN_MEG
from sys.v_$session s, sys.v_$sort_usage u, sys.v_$parameter vp
where s.saddr = u.session_addr
and vp.name = 'db_block_size'
and s.osuser like '%'
group by s.osuser, s.sid, s.username, s.serial#, vp.value
order by sort_size_in_meg;
select to_char(round(sum(bytes)/1024/1024)) meg,
sum(extents),tablespace_name,segment_type,owner||'.'||segment_name
from dba_segments where segment_type='TEMPORARY'
group by tablespace_name,segment_type,owner||'.'||segment_name
having round(sum(bytes)/1024/1024)>0
order by round(sum(bytes)/1024/1024);
column osuser format a15
I usually set the sort big to do some maintenance with:
-- Check the available memory on the OS with top.
-- If you go overboard on the memory allocation, sar –g will show paging
-- I usually set the sort_area_size some where between 200 and 900 meg to speed up index rebuilds
alter session set workarea_size_policy='MANUAL';
alter session set sort_area_size=900000000;
alter session set sort_area_retained_size=900000000;
Good luck -
ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace
HI,
i am getting an error in alert log file.....
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1758
Current log# 2 seq# 1758 mem# 0: /dev/vx/rdsk/racdg/orcl_raw_log12
Mon Sep 8 12:34:16 2008
ARC1: Evaluating archive log 1 thread 1 sequence 1757
ARC1: Beginning to archive log 1 thread 1 sequence 1757
Creating archive destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1: '/arch/log/1_1757.dbf'
ARC1: Completed archiving log 1 thread 1 sequence 1757
Mon Sep 8 13:04:26 2008
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x6de.2.10], SCN: 0x0000.6c1f757f
Mon Sep 8 13:49:16 2008
ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMPI don';t want to add datafile
SQL> select bytes,maxbytes,increment_by from dba_temp_files;
BYTES MAXBYTES INCREMENT_BY
6134169600 0 0
SQL> select TABLESPACE_NAME, BYTES_USED, BYTES_FREE from V$TEMP_SPACE_HEADER;
TABLESPACE_NAME BYTES_USED BYTES_FREE
TEMP 6037700608 96468992i have also referred metalink note: 19047.1
Is there any way to avoid this problem without adding any datafile........how to find out which session is using temp tablespace
SQL> select * from v$sort_usage;
USERNAME USER SESSION_ADDR
SESSION_NUM SQLADDR SQLHASH TABLESPACE
CONTENTS SEGTYPE SEGFILE# SEGBLK# EXTENTS BLOCKS SEGRFNO#
DATA3 DATA3 000000044D84F558
25860 00 0 TEMP
TEMPORARY DATA 201 183561 1 128 1pls correct me if the above query is worng to find out the no. of session s using temp tablespace
i think we have already allocated good amt of space to pga_aggregate_target
SQL> show parameter pga
NAME TYPE VALUE
pga_aggregate_target big integer 524288000
SQL>Edited by: user00726 on Sep 8, 2008 2:29 AM -
Hi,
I am still facing the error for table space evnthough datafile is avl
READER_1_1_1 RR_4035 SQL Error [
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMP2
Database driver error...
Function Name : Execute
SQL Stmt : SELECT
ONLINE DATA PERMANENT LOCAL 200 0.063 0.03
ONLINE DEV1_BIPLATFORM PERMANENT LOCAL 64 44.313 69.24
ONLINE DEV1_IAS_TEMP TEMPORARY LOCAL 100 0 0
ONLINE DEV1_MDS PERMANENT LOCAL 100 5.438 5.44
ONLINE DEV_BIPLATFORM PERMANENT LOCAL 64 44.313 69.24
ONLINE DEV_IAS_TEMP TEMPORARY LOCAL 100 0 0
ONLINE DEV_MDS PERMANENT LOCAL 100 5.438 5.44
ONLINE EXAMPLE PERMANENT LOCAL 975.188 109.125 11.19
ONLINE FLA_TBS1 PERMANENT LOCAL 10 0.063 0.63
ONLINE MES_DW2 PERMANENT LOCAL 2,091.19 1,794.19 85.8
ONLINE SYSAUX PERMANENT LOCAL 1,245.38 906.938 72.82
ONLINE SYSTEM PERMANENT LOCAL 3,300.00 2,429.44 73.62
ONLINE TEMP TEMPORARY LOCAL 24,458.00 5,020.00 20.52
ONLINE TOOLS PERMANENT LOCAL 1,050.00 0.063 0.01
ONLINE UNDOTBS1 UNDO LOCAL 2,670.00 95.438 3.57
ONLINE USERS PERMANENT LOCAL 43,530.98 30,366.30 69.76No Sense:
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMP2
tablespace TEMP2
Database driver error...
Function Name : Execute
SQL Stmt : SELECT
ONLINE DATA PERMANENT LOCAL 200 0.063 0.03
ONLINE DEV1_BIPLATFORM PERMANENT LOCAL 64 44.313 69.24
ONLINE DEV1_IAS_TEMP TEMPORARY LOCAL 100 0 0
ONLINE DEV1_MDS PERMANENT LOCAL 100 5.438 5.44
ONLINE DEV_BIPLATFORM PERMANENT LOCAL 64 44.313 69.24
ONLINE DEV_IAS_TEMP TEMPORARY LOCAL 100 0 0
ONLINE DEV_MDS PERMANENT LOCAL 100 5.438 5.44
ONLINE EXAMPLE PERMANENT LOCAL 975.188 109.125 11.19
ONLINE FLA_TBS1 PERMANENT LOCAL 10 0.063 0.63
ONLINE MES_DW2 PERMANENT LOCAL 2,091.19 1,794.19 85.8
ONLINE SYSAUX PERMANENT LOCAL 1,245.38 906.938 72.82
ONLINE SYSTEM PERMANENT LOCAL 3,300.00 2,429.44 73.62
ONLINE TEMP TEMPORARY LOCAL 24,458.00 5,020.00 20.52
ONLINE TOOLS PERMANENT LOCAL 1,050.00 0.063 0.01
ONLINE UNDOTBS1 UNDO LOCAL 2,670.00 95.438 3.57
ONLINE USERS PERMANENT LOCAL 43,530.98 30,366.30 69.76
tablespace TEMP2 doesn't exist.
i used statement
ALTER TABLESPACE temp
ADD TEMPFILE 'D:\app\TEMP16.DBF' SIZE 128M autoextend on;
ALTER TABLESPACE
USERS ADD DATAFILE 'D:\app\SYS00.DBF' SIZE 1080M autoextend on;
alter user DATAWAREHOUSE quota unlimited on USERS
why add datafile in user tablespace¿?
and you solved the issue doing the same like we told you a few days before in:
ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace
unable to create INITIAL extent for segment in tablespace USERS
Remember close your threads:
896398
Handle: 896398
Status Level: Newbie
Registered: Nov 9, 2011
Total Posts: 530
Total Questions: 158 (116 unresolved)
Maybe you are looking for
-
Would someone please help me figure out why Time Machine has stopped backing up?
Hi, I am a Macbook Pro User running 10.6.8. I recently moved all of my photos, music and videos over to a 1TB Western Digital HD that I attach via usb. I believe that this is when the problem started. When I enter Time Machine, the last backup was
-
Can I download ML a second time on originil computer,after I erase it ? Do I have to pay $A20.99 a second time ? I know about > command R and how to download ML. richard
-
Fresh Leopard Install and Time Machine
Leopard has been a miserable experience on my Imac 1.8Ghz G5. It has played havoc with the fan management and constantly overheats causing an abrupt switching off with a "pop" (presumably a safety feature). I am planning a completely fresh Leopard in
-
SOAP and javax.mail.internet.ContentType
Hi there, I have a problem with a very simple SOAP app: I get a saaj error "Unable to internalize message", which gets caused by a NoClassDefFoundError: javax/mail/internet/ContentTypeI have tried everything: 1) Copied mail.jar to ./jre/lib/ext 2) Ad
-
My iPhone 4 keeps losing my notes? I learned thru this forum they get moved into a folder in my email account. Why is this happening? It is not where I want them. Is there a limit to how many notes you have? I only had about 10 different 1-page