ORA-13199 Error on a spatial query
Hi,
I am getting following Error on a spatial query (on version 11.1.0.7)
"ORA-13199: Dimensionalities of geometry (GTYPE 3003) and diminfo (2) do not match.
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.MD", line 1723
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.MDERR", line 17
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_CS", line 2809
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_3GL", line 182 "
The same query used to work fine on 10.2.
My query looks like
Select Sfilt.GEOMETRY FROM
(Select TA.GEOMETRY FROM LANDPLAN.TOPOAREA TA, TEST.PLAN PL
WHERE PL.PLAN_ID = 12345 AND TA.LOC_CODE = 7
AND SDO_FILTER(TA.GEOMETRY,PL.GEOMETRY) = 'TRUE'
) Sfilt
,TEST.PLAN PL2 WHERE
PL2.PLAN_ID = 12345 AND
SDO_RELATE(PL2.GEOMETRY, sfilt.GEOMETRY, 'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE';
in the above data TEST.PLAN table is 2D table and LANDPLAN.TOPOAREA is 3D table and both are indexed.
Any help appriciated..
Siva,
Thank you for your response. Now I have tried by increasing the DIMINFO (rebuiding the index) to three.
Now it shows below error..
ORA-29902: error in executing ODCIIndexStart() routine
ORA-13243: specified operator is not supported for 3- or higher-dimensional R-tree
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD_10I", line 416
I didn't reason now...for clarity
Can I have 3d layer with 2d index's ?
If Yes, can Spatial query work using these 2d index's against other 2d layer and 3d layers ?
Similar Messages
-
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server
Hi all
What are the basic reasons of this error:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server
I have received this error while running report>>>What are the basic reasons of this error:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server string
Cause: A parallel query server reached an exception condition.
Action: Check the following error message for the cause, and consult your error manual for the appropriate action. -
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
Hello All,
Week before one of the APPLY process ABORTED with following error:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 104 bytes of shared memory ("streams pool","unknown object","apply shared t","knalfGetTxn:lcr")
We are using ORACLE 10.2.0.4.0 on HP unix B.11.23
For now, I have started the APPLY process again and it's working properly.
When I looked into the trace file it shows following
A001: [enq: TM - contention] name|mode=544d0002, object #=2a67, table/partition=0
*** 2009-06-15 10:53:57.897
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 267 for event (since 302 seconds):
A001: [enq: TM - contention] name|mode=544d0002, object #=2a67, table/partition=0
*** 2009-06-15 10:58:58.792
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 267 for event (since 603 seconds):
A001: [enq: TM - contention] name|mode=544d0002, object #=2a67, table/partition=0
*** 2009-06-15 12:14:36.679
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580004, usn<<16 | slot=90028, sequence=1b743
*** 2009-06-15 12:19:36.961
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 181 for event (since 300 seconds):
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580004, usn<<16 | slot=90028, sequence=1b743
*** 2009-06-15 12:24:37.417
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 181 for event (since 600 seconds):
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580004, usn<<16 | slot=90028, sequence=1b743
*** 2009-06-15 12:29:37.906
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 181 for event (since 901 seconds):
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580004, usn<<16 | slot=90028, sequence=1b743
*** 2009-06-15 12:34:37.428
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 181 for event (since 1201 seconds):
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580004, usn<<16 | slot=90028, sequence=1b743
*** 2009-06-19 11:26:44.601
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580006, usn<<16 | slot=8001e, sequence=1a4af
*** 2009-06-19 11:31:43.753
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 212 for event (since 300 seconds):
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580006, usn<<16 | slot=8001e, sequence=1a4af
*** 2009-06-19 11:36:44.149
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 212 for event (since 600 seconds):
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580006, usn<<16 | slot=8001e, sequence=1a4af
*** 2009-06-19 11:41:43.775
A001: warning -- apply server 1, sid 302 waiting on user sid 212 for event (since 900 seconds):
A001: [enq: TX - row lock contention] name|mode=54580006, usn<<16 | slot=8001e, sequence=1a4af
*** 2009-06-23 16:55:24.002
A001: [enq: TM - contention] name|mode=544d0004, object #=2c05, table/partition=0
*** 2009-06-29 09:48:58.166
A001: [enq: TM - contention] name|mode=544d0004, object #=2c05, table/partition=0
*** 2009-07-01 06:02:37.236
A001: [enq: TM - contention] name|mode=544d0004, object #=2c05, table/partition=0
*** 2009-07-01 11:46:43.672
error 12801 in STREAMS process
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 104 bytes of shared memory ("streams pool","unknown object","apply shared t","knalfGetTxn:lcr")
OPIRIP: Uncaught error 447. Error stack:
ORA-00447: fatal error in background process
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 104 bytes of shared memory ("streams pool","unknown object","apply shared t","knalfGetTxn:lcr")
Can you please help to provide details on that how i can fix this problem permanetely.
Any suggestions would be great!
Thanks,
NickIt seems that you are using Oracle database and not Berkeley Database.
To fix ORA-04031 errors on streams pool, you need to increase streams pool size with
alter system set streams_pool_size=<the right value>;See recommandations in http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14229/strms_mprep.htm#i1006278 -
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P007
Hi friends,
I am running a update on a big table with parallel clause.
I got the below error.Can someone help what should i next? This query takes a long time to execute(nearly 1 hour).
I searched on google and metalink but no success yet.
=======
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P007
ORA-00001: unique constraint (VEL5APPO.BL1_CHARGE_PK) violated
=======
Cheers,
KunwarKunwar wrote:
Hi friends,
I am running a update on a big table with parallel clause.
I got the below error.Can someone help what should i next? This query takes a long time to execute(nearly 1 hour).
I searched on google and metalink but no success yet.
=======
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P007
ORA-00001: unique constraint (VEL5APPO.BL1_CHARGE_PK) violated
=======Not sure why you think this a complex and unusual and difficult to understand error. It is very clear what is happening.
WHAT: your code violates constraint VEL5APPO.BL1_CHARGE_PK that says that one or more columns must contain unique values.
Who says it? That is specified by the first line in the error stack.
WHO: parallel query process 7 ran into the constraint error
So what's happening? Your SQL is executed in parallel. Up to 7 PX slaves are used to run your SQL - with each slave running the SAME SQL for DIFFERENT rowid ranges. PX slave 7 attempted an insert/update that would have resulted in a duplicate row. The database constraint protecting the integrity of that table, prevented it.
So the error is very clear as to what is wrong, why it is wrong, and where it is happening.
I fail to understand that you search google and metalink and failed to find answers, when the error is meaningful....? -
SQL Error: ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P007
Hi all
I am getting the following error when doing aggregation for a cube
<b>SQL Error: ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P007.</b>Job is showing as finished but no aggregation is hapenning.
regards
KKfor ORA- 20000
check the note below it shows you have insufficient authorizations.
<b>Reason and Prerequisites</b>
You are using BW 7.00 with Support Package 07 or higher.
The BW module for the update statistics has been adjusted to SAPDBA or BRConnect (with regard to the heuristic, which is when, how and which statistics are created). To ensure that all table changes are taken into account, the relevant information must be flushed from the Oracle memory before the update statistics is carried out. For this purpose, the SAPCONN role (higher than ORA 10.2) or SAP SAP<sid> oder SAPR3 (ORA 10.1) requires additional authorizations that were not assigned up to now.
<b> Note 963760 - 'ORA-20000: Insufficient privileges' for creating statistics</b>
For Error -for SQL Error: ORA-01418: specified index does not exist
check note below-
<b>Note 337830 - BW: ORA-1418 in system log</b>
It seems that Index no longer exist which you are trying to delete.The 900 index, which exists on the F table only if the E table is partitioned, is deleted twice and on the second attempt it no longer exists.
<b>
Note 1003360 - BW fact tables: Deleting index from process chain terminates</b>
If it relates your error it requires corrections for SP-12.
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP.. -
Urgent, ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
Hi Guys,
I am using Oracle 9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 with Windows 2000 Server.
I have just upgrade my database from 8i to 9i. I am facing this problem in a lot of queries in my application after upgrade. I tried to searched out but unable to find the reason yet.
Is there any parameter which i should /should not use? Or need to change any parameter.
Oracle Error Occured: ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
Thanks in advance.
Brgs,
HassanWell, the error stack should be displayed along with the 12801 error.
If not, look the comment for the error I posted above: use event 10397 to display the actual error.ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10397 trace name context forever, level 1'; and if the error raises, then you'll get the source message, not the PQ message.
See note 21281.1 on Metalink.
Regards,
Yoann. -
ERROR - ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P098
Hi Experts,
Today one of our developer complained that they are continously getting the below error in their application logs
ERROR - ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P098
ORA-01461: can bind a LONG value only for insert into a LONG column
When we checked we didn't find any error in our alert log and we have enough space in our temp tablespace as we are unable to understand exactly why are we getting the above error.
Please help..
Thanks....Please check, Couple of useful MOS Notes
How to Analyze an ORA-12801 (Doc ID 1187823.1)
ORA-01461 Can Bind A Long Value Only For Insert Into A Long Column (Doc ID 387587.1) -
"ORA-12801: error signalled in parallel query server"
A client of ours is using our reporting tool, Impromptu 6, to report from an Oracle 8.1.6 database connecting with Net8. He has built a simple report which displays a single item from a single table but it fails with:-
Query Server Error
"ORA-12801: error signalled in parallel query server"
Error number -9:
DMS-E-GENERAL, A general exception has occurred during operation 'asynchronous open'.
According to Oracle documentation, there should be an accompanying error message with the ORA-12801 which gives more information.
The last few lines of the DMAUDFIL show:-
OCI OEXEC LINE 5219:orsgbl.C
OCI OEXEC LINE 5219:orsgbl.C
CHECK_CODE2 -12801 LINE 5249:orsgbl.C
OCI OERHMS -12801,ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server
LINE 858:orsmisc.C
The DMAPIFIL shows no error.
The query being sent to the database is:-
select T1."PRD_LVL_PARENT" "c1"
from "JDAOPRD"."PRDMSTEE" T1
where PRD_LVL_PARENT is defined as NUMBER(12)
If they paste the above into SQL*Plus, it works fine.
Reporting any other items from the database do not give this error.
If they use the Oracle ODBC driver, they don't get the problem but it runs a lot slower.As your ORA-12801 is followed by a ORA-0600 this should be a database bug. First of all I'd bring the database on the last patchlevel (10.2.0.5), and if the error persists you can use the ORA-600/ORA-7445 Troubleshooter (Metalink Note 153788.1). If this doesn't help either you should log a SR with oracle support (you need a support contract to do all those steps).
Also I don't think forms 5 is certified against a 10gR2 database, so this might cause your trouble. For 6i you should use the latest patchset.
If you don't have a valid support contract you might have a chance in putting your query in a database procedure.
cheers -
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P002
We are encountering the below problem frequently in SUN SOLARIS BOX
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P002
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMPHi,
This is TEMP tablespace issue.
1. Identify the query(s) for which it is happening.
2. Size your TEMP tablespace by monitoring usage of it.
set lines 200
column osuser format A20
column tablespace format A20
SELECT b.tablespace, b.segfile#, b.segblk#, b.blocks, a.sid, a.serial#,
a.username, a.osuser, a.status
FROM v$session a,v$sort_usage b
WHERE a.saddr = b.session_addr
and a.osuser = nvl('&osuser',a.osuser)
ORDER BY b.tablespace, b.segfile#, b.segblk#, b.blocks;
3. Check all queries have required join conditions or not. Cartezian product of two huge tables creates problem.
Dilipkumar Patel. -
Apply process is aborting with:ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query
hi,
We created a queue of a specific type, capture and apply process on the queue. Then we started the queue capture and the apply process. The problem is that the apply process is getting enabled and with in moments going into aborted state. wea re getting the follwoing error:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kwqiceval:anyconv], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Any idea what could have gone wrong?
scripts:
exec dbms_aqadm.create_queue_table(queue_table=>'qt_anc',queue_payload_type=>'type_anc',multiple_consumers=> true, compatible => '9.0');
exec dbms_aqadm.create_queue (queue_name => 'q_anc',queue_table=>'qt_anc');
EXEC DBMS_AQADM.START_QUEUE (queue_name => 'q_anc');
DECLARE
emp_rule_name_dml VARCHAR2(300);
emp_rule_name_ddl VARCHAR2(300);
BEGIN
DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.ADD_TABLE_RULES(
table_name => 'ops.t_anc',
streams_type => 'capture',
streams_name => 'capture_anc',
queue_name => 'strmadmin.q_anc',
include_dml => true,
include_ddl => false,
source_database => null,
dml_rule_name => emp_rule_name_dml,
ddl_rule_name => emp_rule_name_ddl);
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_ENQUEUE_DESTINATION(
rule_name => emp_rule_name_dml,
destination_queue_name => 'strmadmin.q_anc');
END;
DECLARE
emp_rule_name_dml VARCHAR2(300);
emp_rule_name_ddl VARCHAR2(300);
BEGIN
DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.ADD_TABLE_RULES(
table_name => 'ops.t_anc',
streams_type => 'apply',
streams_name => 'apply_anc',
queue_name => 'strmadmin.q_anc',
include_dml => true,
include_ddl => false,
source_database => null,
dml_rule_name => emp_rule_name_dml,
ddl_rule_name => emp_rule_name_ddl);
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_ENQUEUE_DESTINATION(
rule_name => emp_rule_name_dml,
destination_queue_name => 'strmadmin.q_anc');
END;
BEGIN
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.START_APPLY(
apply_name => 'apply_anc');
END;
BEGIN
DBMS_CAPTURE_ADM.START_CAPTURE(
capture_name => 'capture_anc');
END;
/Hello
The above configuration is never supported. The implicit capture expects the queue payload to be SYS.ANYDATA and same with implicit apply also.
However you can use Streams Messaging capability to achieve this. You need to wrap the messages with SYS.ANYDATA for this to work. The implicit capture uses a persistent logminer session to generate LCRs and it then wraps it with SYS.ANYDATA and enqueues into the capture queue, it then propagated to apply queue. You can generate LCRs and wrap it with SYS.ANYDATA and then enqueue into the capture queue then apply can recognise the messages.
Here is an example on creating LCRs (tested in 10g):
CREATE TABLE lcr_test (col1 NUMBER);
DECLARE
l_lcr SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD;
BEGIN
l_lcr :=
SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD.CONSTRUCT
source_database_name=>SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','DB_NAME'),
command_type=>'INSERT',
object_owner=>USER,
object_name=>'LCR_TEST'
l_lcr.ADD_COLUMN('new','col1',SYS.AnyData.ConvertNumber(99));
l_lcr.EXECUTE(TRUE);
COMMIT;
END;
SELECT * FROM lcr_test;
Converting to SYS.ANYDATA:
DECLARE
l_lcr SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD;
l_anydata SYS.ANYDATA;
BEGIN
l_lcr :=
SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD.CONSTRUCT
source_database_name=>SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','DB_NAME'),
command_type=>'INSERT',
object_owner=>USER,
object_name=>'LCR_TEST'
l_lcr.ADD_COLUMN('new','col1',SYS.AnyData.ConvertNumber(99));
l_anydata:=SYS.ANYDATA.ConvertObject(l_lcr);
ENQ_PROC(l_anydata);
COMMIT;
END;
Thanks,
Rijesh -
Ora:-12801: error signaled in parellel query serverp040
I want to order by data in with statement
Using Below query I am getting an error "ora:-12801: error signaled in parellel query serverp040"
select * from (
With Bk_lifephase as(select a.id,a.order_dt,VIDEOS,VETERAN,CAT
from product a, profile b
where a.id=b.id
select 1 dimension_sort,'LIFESTYLE','BUY_PRE_RECORDED_VIDEOS',2 attribute_sort,
count(unique(case when order_dt>=sysdate-45 and VIDEOS='Y' then id end)) one_month,
count(unique(case when order_dt>=sysdate-105 and VIDEOS='Y' then id end)) three_month
from Bk_lifephase where VIDEOS='Y'
union
select 1,'LIFESTYLE','VETERAN',3,
count(unique(case when order_dt>=sysdate-45 and VETERAN='Y' then id end)) one_month,
count(unique(case when order_dt>=sysdate-105 and VETERAN='Y' then id end)) three_month
from Bk_lifephase where VETERAN='Y' group by VETERAN
union
select 1,'LIFESTYLE','OWN_A_CAT',4,
count(unique(case when order_dt>=sysdate-45 and CAT='Y' then id end)) one_month,
count(unique(case when order_dt>=sysdate-105 and CAT='Y' then id end)) three_month
from Bk_lifephase where CAT='Y' group by CAT
order by attribute_sort,dimension_sort
if I dont use order by statement queyr is working fine
Please suggestNormally this error is only the starting one, what else is shown (alertlog,trace files)?
ORA-12801, 00000, "error signaled in parallel query server %s"
Cause: A parallel query server reached an exception condition.
Action: Check the following error message for the cause, and consult your error manual for the appropriate action.
*Comment: This error can be turned off with event 10397, in which case the server's actual error is signaled instead.
============================================================================
You can activate the mentioned event to get more detailed informations. -
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P001 and ORA-01008:
I am trying to refresh a refresh group i am getting the below error. This refresh group is on a database RIO12. All Mviews on this database point to target database - TRIO23 (which has master tables) using database link. The refresh group has 21 Mviews. Mview ACCOUNT is one of them i am getting the below error.
BEGIN dbms_refresh.refresh('PLATS.PLATS_RG'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12048: error encountered while refreshing materialized view "PLATS"."ACCOUNT"
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P001
ORA-01008: not all variables bound
ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from TRIO23
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2254
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2460
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_IREFRESH", line 683
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_REFRESH", line 195
ORA-06512: at line 1
TRIO23 is oracle version 10.2.0.5.0, RIO12 is oracle version 10.2.0.3.0
Refreshing PLATS_RG refresh group has no problems from last 2 years, other 20 MViews when executed manually they are refreshed. Please help me in resolving this error. Thanks.Do you have cursor_sharing set to force or similar? if so then you may be hitting bug Bug 5863277. Please confirm with Oracle support.
thanks -
ORA-1555 ORA-3136 errors:: elapsed time vs Query Duration
Dear all,
- My Database version is 11.2.0.2, Solaris.
- We have been having a problem in the production database where the front end nodes start going up and down for couple of hours sometimes. ; When node flapping is going on we get connection timed out alerts.
WARNING: inbound connection timed out (ORA-3136) opiodr aborting
process unknown ospid (4342) as a result of ORA-609 opiodr aborting
process unknown ospid (4532) as a result of ORA-609 opiodr aborting
process unknown ospid (4534) as a result of ORA-609 opiodr aborting....
Since this week node flapping is happening every day. Since past 2 days after or during node flapping we are getting ORA-1555 error.
Extract from alert log error:
ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (SQL ID: g8804k5pkmtyt, Query Duration=19443 sec, SCN: 0x0001.07bd90ed):
SELECT d.devId, d.vendor, d.model, d.productClass, d.oui, d.parentDeviceId, d.created, d.lastModified AS devLastMod, d.customerId, d.userKey1, d.userKey2, d.userKey4, d
.userKey5, d.firmwareFamily, d.softwareVer, d.serialNum, d.ip, d.mac, d.userKey3, d.userKey6, d.provisioningId, d.status, d.classification, d.population, d.name, d.ipRe
solver, d.ipExpirationTime, d.geoLocationId,contact.firstContactTime, ifaces.id, ifaces.type AS ifaceType, ifaces.lastModified AS ifaceLastMod, ifaces.timeoutname, ifac
es.username1, ifaces.password1, ifaces.username2, ifaces.password2, ifaces.connReqUrl, ifaces.connReqScheme, ifaces.srvNonce, ifaces.deviceNonce, ifaces.phoneNumber,ifa
ces.bootstrapSecMethod, ifaces.srvAuthentication, ifaces.deviceAuthentication, ifaces.userPIN, ifaces.networkID, ifaces.omaSessionID, ifaces.portNum, ifaces.mgtIp, ifac
es.cmtsIp, ifaces.mgtReadCommunity, ifaces.mgtWriteCommunity, ifaces.cmtsReadCommunity, ifaces.cmtsWriteCommunity, devto.name AS devtoName, devto.rebootTimeout, devto.sessionInitiationI run Statspack report from the whole day duration, and looking into the elapsed time in seconds no more than 3739.61 sec (too lower than run duration in the alert log file of 19443 sec); So I would like to know if there is any co-relations between the ORA-3136 errors and the ORA-1555 errors?
CPU CPU per Elapsd Old
Time (s) Executions Exec (s) %Total Time (s) Buffer Gets Hash Value
tTime <= :3 ) AND (endTime IS NULL OR endTime >= :4 )
2773.77 7,787,914 0.00 3.4 3739.61 112,671,645 1909376826
Module: JDBC Thin Client
SELECT d.devId, d.vendor, d.model, d.productClass, d.oui, d.pare
ntDeviceId, d.created, d.lastModified AS devLastMod, d.customerI
d, d.userKey1, d.userKey2, d.userKey4, d.userKey5, d.firmwareFam
ily, d.softwareVer, d.serialNum, d.ip, d.mac, d.userKey3, d.user
SQL> show parameter UNDO_MANAGEMENT
NAME TYPE VALUE
undo_management string AUTO
SQL> show parameter UNDO_RETENTION
NAME TYPE VALUE
undo_retention integer 10800BR,
DiegoThank you. Please let me know if it is enough or you need more information;
SQL ordered by Gets DB/Inst: DB01/db01 Snaps: 14835-14846
-> End Buffer Gets Threshold: 100000 Total Buffer Gets: 677,689,568
-> Captured SQL accounts for 73.6% of Total Buffer Gets
-> SQL reported below exceeded 1.0% of Total Buffer Gets
CPU Elapsd Old
Buffer Gets Executions Gets per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
21,286,248 2,632,793 8.1 3.4 666.73 666.76 3610154549
Module: JDBC Thin Client
SELECT d.devId, d.vendor, d.model, d.productClass, d.oui, d.pare
ntDeviceId, d.created, d.lastModified AS devLastMod, d.customerI
d, d.userKey1, d.userKey2, d.userKey4, d.userKey5, d.firmwareFam
ily, d.softwareVer, d.serialNum, d.ip, d.mac, d.userKey3, d.user
17,029,561 1,176,849 14.5 2.7 417.32 416.73 1909376826
Module: JDBC Thin Client
SELECT d.devId, d.vendor, d.model, d.productClass, d.oui, d.pare
ntDeviceId, d.created, d.lastModified AS devLastMod, d.customerI
d, d.userKey1, d.userKey2, d.userKey4, d.userKey5, d.firmwareFam
ily, d.softwareVer, d.serialNum, d.ip, d.mac, d.userKey3, d.user
17,006,795 37 459,643.1 2.7 367.61 368.95 4045552861
Module: JDBC Thin Client
SELECT d.devId, d.vendor, d.model, d.productClass, d.oui, d.pare
ntDeviceId, d.created, d.lastModified AS devLastMod, d.customerI
d, d.userKey1, d.userKey2, d.userKey4, d.userKey5, d.firmwareFam
ily, d.softwareVer, d.serialNum, d.ip, d.mac, d.userKey3, d.userAnother Statspack report for the whole day shows;
SQL ordered by CPU DB/Inst: DB01/db01 Snaps: 14822-14847
-> Total DB CPU (s): 82,134
-> Captured SQL accounts for 40.9% of Total DB CPU
-> SQL reported below exceeded 1.0% of Total DB CPU
CPU CPU per Elapsd Old
Time (s) Executions Exec (s) %Total Time (s) Buffer Gets Hash Value
tTime <= :3 ) AND (endTime IS NULL OR endTime >= :4 )
2773.77 7,787,914 0.00 3.4 3739.61 112,671,645 1909376826
Module: JDBC Thin Client
SELECT d.devId, d.vendor, d.model, d.productClass, d.oui, d.pare
ntDeviceId, d.created, d.lastModified AS devLastMod, d.customerI
d, d.userKey1, d.userKey2, d.userKey4, d.userKey5, d.firmwareFam
ily, d.softwareVer, d.serialNum, d.ip, d.mac, d.userKey3, d.user
SQL ordered by Gets DB/Inst: DB01/db01 Snaps: 14822-14847
-> End Buffer Gets Threshold: 100000 Total Buffer Gets: 1,416,456,340
-> Captured SQL accounts for 55.8% of Total Buffer Gets
-> SQL reported below exceeded 1.0% of Total Buffer Gets
CPU Elapsd Old
Buffer Gets Executions Gets per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
86,354,963 7,834,326 11.0 6.3 2557.34 2604.08 906944860
Module: JDBC Thin Client
SELECT d.devId, d.vendor, d.model, d.productClass, d.oui, d.pare
ntDeviceId, d.created, d.lastModified AS devLastMod, d.customerI
d, d.userKey1, d.userKey2, d.userKey4, d.userKey5, d.firmwareFam
ily, d.softwareVer, d.serialNum, d.ip, d.mac, d.userKey3, d.user
.....BR,
Diego
Edited by: 899660 on 27-ene-2012 7:43
Edited by: 899660 on 27-ene-2012 7:45 -
ORA-27092 Error while executing any query from client
Hello
I am getting following error while executing any query from client remotly.
IAMDBA@TEST_OAT.ABCD > select userid from dual;
select userid from dual
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-01116: error in opening database file 1
ORA-01110: data file 1: '/u01/prod/system/system01.dbf'
ORA-27092: size of file exceeds file size limit of the process
Additional information: 131071
Additional information: 286209
But while local connection,its working.hi,
ulimit command- Limit user resources
su - oracle
ulimit -n (this command will show you the current value for ulimit the default value is 1024)
to increase its value:---
ulimit -n <some value> ( this command will change value for current session only)
example
ulimit -n 101062
once done check the value as:--
ulimit -n( for verification)
search in google for more explanation or revert back to me for any suggestions.... :)
Edited by: varun4dba on Jan 31, 2011 4:09 PM -
ORA-12801 error signalled in parallel query with ORA-00018 max # session
Hello,
I've just run dbca to create a new database. On completion I received the following:
ORA-12801 error was signalled in parallel query server
ORA-00018 maximum number of sessions exceeded
ORA-06512 at sys_utl_recomp line 760
ORA-06512 as sys_utl_recomp line 773
ORA-06512 as sys_utl_recomp line 1
The processes are set at 100, sessions is set at 115?
Can you tell how to address this error and resolve the problem? I'm thinking that I should rerun sys_utl_recompHi,
You didn't mention oracle version as well OS.
might be you hit a bug.
check the below link for reference
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:8051847734518941130::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,21564.1,1,1,1,helvetica
Regards,
Taj
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have just had my hard drive replaced and now I can.t find Air Port to get wi fi
I have just had my hard drive replaced and now I can't find Air Port for my wi fi
-
Some PO's, invoiced Amount missing
Hi All, I have a problem here stating that the for few purchase orders, Invoiced Amount is missing , Inspite of the fact that these amounts are booked and exists in in General Ledger. I checked in BW, for one PO and its invoiced amount is positive
-
Hi I am using MyFaces 1.1.3 and i noticed the following strange behaviour. I have the following code: class Bean extends HashTable<String,Element> { class Bean2 extends Bean { private String hello = "hello"; public String getHello() { return hello; n
-
My iTunes library shows all music but there is an exclamation mark to the left on all entries and there is a message stating "original file could not be found" although all music is on the iPad.
-
HT201448 Is there any way to Change the order of preference? Ie wiki before Xcode?
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS5239 states the order services take precedence. I would like wiki to come first. Is there a way to configure redirection?