ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level

We recently updated our development environment to Visual Studio 2010. We have previously deployed (with success) .Net stored procedures from Visual Studio 2005 to our Oracle 10gR2 database. I am currently trying to configure a local instance (called local) of Oracle 10gR2 database to test deployment of .Net stored procedures to Oracle 10gR2 via Visual studio 2010 and ODT version 11.2.0.1.2. I have built the demo from the ode developer guide and gotten as far as deploying it but executing the stored procedures from VS 2010 or SQL*Plus produces the following error...
ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CLR", line 152
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.GETDEPTNO", line 7
Here is what I have done.
(Server)
1. Installed oracle 10gR2 with ODE.Net
2. Installed Oracle 10gR2 patch set 22
3. Installed ODE upgrade from Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21
(Client)
4. Installed Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21 (In new client home).
5. Installed patch set 22 on 10g client home.
6. Installed Oracle 11g Release 2 ODAC 11.2.0.1.2 with Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio(in new 11g client home, only for VS 2010)
I have made some minor changes (GAC) etc. per the following threads...
ODE.NET 11.1.0.7.20 on 10g Database?!
Re: Error: System.TypeInitializationException
The database appears to be fully functional via TOAD - SQL plus etc. I can't find much on this error but it appears Oracle needs some permissions to launch an ASP.Net application that it does not have. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated, don't hesitate to ask for additional details.

The KB article is almost what we have apart from theitalic underlined
part
Consider the following scenario:
You use a domain administrator account to log on to a computer that is running Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
You use the Active Directory Users and Computers Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in to connect to a domain controller.
You open the Properties dialog box of a user account.
The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
You set the Remote Desktop Services Home Folderattribute to the shared folder path.
NoteThis attribute is located on the
Remote Desktop Services Profiletab.
You click Apply or OK.
In this scenario, you receive the following error message:
The home folder could not be created because: The network name cannot be found.
Note If you click Apply or OK again, no error message is returned. However, the setting is not saved.
I think the important bit is
The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
We manually create the shares on our NAS and then just want to enter the path in the profile tab, I suppose the question is how to we stop it trying to create the shares ?

Similar Messages

  • COREid Federation Error: A local user session could not be created for the

    Hi,
    I installed two instances of COREid Federation in my machine. Also installed SiteMinder and LDAP. Source Domain of COREid (8101) uses LDAP as IdMBridge and Destination Domain (9101) uses SiteMinder as IdMBridge. I am trying to access the resource protected by the SiteMinder from the source domain using the URL which is constructed using the pattern given in the PDF:
    http://mymachine.domain.com:8101/shareid/saml/ObSAMLTransferService?DOMAIN=DestinationDomain&method=POST&TARGET=http://mymachine.domain.com:8887/Source/Source.html
    Assertions are generated and I can see the assertion in the Source domain and transferred to the Destination Domain.
    I get the following error in the Destination Domain Shareid Log file:
    ERROR - [http10113-Processor3] - RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion
    Please help me to solve this issue?
    Note: The Web agent runs on the web server instance 8887.
    SiteMinder is able to protect the resource when accessed.

    Typically that error occurs when the destinations access management system can't find the user based on the SAML attribute. Check to make sure that the attribute that you are matching on matches exactly.

  • SHAREid - A local user session could not be created for the assertion

    Problem: We have a client trying to federate to our environment using POST profile but we are getting the following error, "RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion".
    I verified that the user exist in the directory and I am able to execute a test successfully as that user.
    Thanks.

    There is a requirement that the client needs to send an attribute called "traveler" in the assertion. We found out that the problem occurs only when client sends a attribute in the assertion. When the assertion does not include the attribute, there is no issue. Not sure why that is the case as we have other clients sending the same attribute in the assertion.
    Here is the AttributeStatement.
    <saml:AttributeStatement xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><saml:Subject><saml:NameIdentifier Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified">XXXXXX</saml:NameIdentifier></saml:Subject><saml:Attribute AttributeName="XXXID" AttributeNamespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims"><saml:AttributeValue>XXXXX</saml:AttributeValue></saml:Attribute></saml:AttributeStatement>
    It does not have <saml:SubjectConfirmation> and <ConfirmationMethod> element. Can that be a problem?
    Thanks,
    Vinay
    Edited by: user504421 on Jul 9, 2009 2:17 PM

  • Trnsaction IW32  :  order  Could not be created for notification

    Hello,
    I have created the notification in  IW51
    In trnsaction IW32  : I am getting error
    Entry MT6
    order  Could not be created for notification  3570075
    Following error could occured : Entry MT6
    Please help me out
    Regards
    Rahul

    Hello,
    IW51
    Notification Type :Z2
    Notification      : 3570065
    Functionlocation  : XYZ
    work Type         :cd  and ef
    Main wotk centr   : ca110 /cusm
    planner group     : msw /cusm
    after I am saving -
    notification 3570099  will saved.
    Then when I am trying to change -
    menu-service notification-change
    I am getting one pop-up-it will directly going to workflow systemworkflow Inbox---
    order not created for notification 3570099
    follwing error occured : MT6
    regards

  • PO could not be creating using the Enjoy-BAPI

    Hi expersts.
    I have a problem with BAPI function module BAPI_PO_CREATE1. When program will generate orders for several suppliers for one supplier "PO could not be creating using the Enjoy-BAPI" and "Purchase order item 00010 still contains faulty schedule lines" and
    "Source not included in list despite source list requirement"  messages occur. Order won't be generated.
    When I am generating order only for that supplier, everything is fine. They are generated and no messages are displayed.
    Could anyone help me ?
    Thanks, regards.
    Dan.

    Hi expersts.
    I have a problem with BAPI function module BAPI_PO_CREATE1. When program will generate orders for several suppliers for one supplier "PO could not be creating using the Enjoy-BAPI" and "Purchase order item 00010 still contains faulty schedule lines" and
    "Source not included in list despite source list requirement"  messages occur. Order won't be generated.
    When I am generating order only for that supplier, everything is fine. They are generated and no messages are displayed.
    Could anyone help me ?
    Thanks, regards.
    Dan.

  • IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc

    I am trying to Post the payment run through the transaction F110.
    In the payment run log i get the following message:
    "IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc"
    But in fact the IDoc is generated and it is displayed in We05.
    I have configured the Message type PAYEXT-PEXR2002 and EUPEXR-IDCREF01 both for the partner.
    Has anybody Idea about why this error is coming and how i can resolve this?
    This is important because in Payment run log, they need to know the IDoc number generated for that run, else it may become difficult for user to identify which IDoc was created for a particular payment run.
    Would appreciate if anyone can please help on the same.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Narayanan

    Hi,
    If you are paying the payment through F110, if the payment exceeds the limit what you are spefied in available amounts in FI12 screen. First Please check this screen.
    still if you are having any problem
    Check in the below path:
    IMG- Financial Accounting (New) - Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable - Business Transactions - Release for Payment - 1. Create Workflow Variant for Release for Payment
    2. Assign Release Approval Procedure for Release for Payment
    3. Define Users with Authorization to Payment Release
    Thanks
    Chandra

  • IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc in F110

    Dear All,
    The below mentioned error is encountered by us in F110.We have check all the setiing  and not able to find the solution for this error.
    Now our heads has gone for a toss....can anyone kindly suggest what and where we have missed out.
    The system is not creating the IDOC file.....
    IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc
    Message no. B1090
    Diagnosis
    The IDoc passed to the ALE layer could not be processed. The specifications passed in the control record were not correct.
    The basic IDoc type (field EDIDC-IDOCTP on the outbound side or EDI_DC-IDOCTYP on the inbound side)has not been specified for this IDoc.
    The attempt to read the basic IDoc type from table EDIDO also failed. No table entry was found for IDoc type  from field DOCTYP.
    Procedure
    Possible error sources:
    - The calling program did not provide values for the fields specified above correctly. Make a note of the transaction in which this error occurred and consult your ALE administrator.
    - The IDoc type  is not known in your system and must be maintained.
    Kindly do the needful.
    Regards

    If you want to create IDocs from the proposal run, outbound parameters (we20) with the 'Test' flag are required in addition.
    see OSS note 504230 : Message EUPEXR forms the logical unit around the individual payment messages (PAYEXT IDocs). The E1IDRD1 segments contain the IDoc numbers of the payment messages in field DOCNUM. Segment E1IDRS1 contains check sums (total of all amounts, account numbers, bank numbers, number of payment messages). This information is provided for the EDI subsystem. Set up EUPEXR In Transaction WE20 for the partner profile for the house bank, create the outbound parameters for message type EUPEXR with IDoc type IDCREF01. If you want to create IDocs from the proposal run, outbound parameters with the 'Test' flag are required in addition.

  • RFC destination BW could not be created in the source system R3073

    I'm creating a source system for our BW (version 7.0) dev client.I'm linking it to our R/3 4.7 QA client. From RSA1 I select create source system, I enter the system information and in the next screen I'm prompted to log on as system administrator. I'm in QA now and the system automatically crated the RFC connection. I test the connection and it runs ok. I log on to the BW client from QA and it logs on just fine. When I exit the screen I get the following message:
    RFC destination BW could not be created in the source system message number R3073
    Why is this happening? The connection tests just fine.
    I'm using RFCREMOTE user in BW and ALEREMOTE in QA with the same password
    Any ideas?
    thanks

    Hi,
    I cannot tell you surely the settings for SCC4 now (I can't connect to my sys).
    Nevertheless, create your R3QA RFCDEST manually in your BWDEV with SM59.
    Create your BWDEV RFCDEST manually in your BWQA .
    Perform test and authorization test within SM59 from both sys.
    When creating the source system in BW the system will detect the RFC and ask you if you want to use it; accept an proceed the the rest of the procedure.
    hope this helps...
    Olivier.

  • Hash could not be matched for the downloded content. Original ContentHash = , Downloaded ContentHash

    <![LOG[Download done setting progress bar to 100]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="1" thread="2544"
    file="downloadcontent.cpp:1603">
    <![LOG[VerifyContentHash: Hash algorithm is 32780]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="1" thread="2544"
    file="downloadcontent.cpp:1726">
    <![LOG[Failed to open file c:\_smstasksequence\packages\cms00007\configmgr2012adminui-rtm-kb2717295-i386.msp with error [32].
    ]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3" thread="2544" file="securityutil.cpp:478">
    <![LOG[HashFile - exclusive access check for the file failed.]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context=""
    type="3" thread="2544" file="hashdir.cpp:227">
    <![LOG[Failed to hash file, Win32 error = 4103]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3"
    thread="2544" file="hashdir.cpp:631">
    <![LOG[Hash could not be matched for the downloded content. Original ContentHash = 0617F93A16E48E5E4AE958081967812D78AF06F608A1C39CD9DE85D97003AD01, Downloaded ContentHash = ]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120"
    date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3" thread="2544" file="downloadcontent.cpp:1771">
    <![LOG[0L == TS::Utility::VerifyPackageHash(pszContentID, sDestination), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,2900)]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013"
    component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="0" thread="2544" file="resolvesource.cpp:2900">
    <![LOG[DownloadContentAndVerifyHash(pszPackageID, L"SMSPackage", saHttpContentSources, saSMBContentSources, saMulticastContentSources, sDestination, dwFlags, L"", 0, dwPackageFlags, pszUserName, pszUserPassword
    ), HRESULT=80091007 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,3007)]LOG]!><time="15:54:30.490-120" date="01-21-2013" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="0" thread="2544"
    file="resolvesource.cpp:3007">
    i saw this links :
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/909ea31c-7bda-49e2-8b06-ed4fc9c3c48c/
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/4801408b-de60-488c-9d80-7a87134abbaf/
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/4942384c-161c-454f-b8da-bc2a24844602
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/a57bb130-f231-4ced-8ec9-2f645ef9e5f1
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/configmgrosd/thread/7146fa83-d00e-4fc1-924b-a829860e506a
    i did not try to do this  Antivirus Scan and Exclusion Recommendations (i relay don't see why i need this if all oder task finshing succesfuly
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/configurationmgr/archive/2010/11/30/configmgr-2007-antivirus-scan-and-exclusion-recommendations.aspx
    i redownload the file from the -kb2717295 and recreate the package , i run this image deployment on all kind of PC they all failed, here is the
    file : configmgr2012adminui-rtm-kb2717295-i386.msp
    i don't know why this file failed, i run this manual it work and this task is also a deployment on collection and it have 100% successes on 8 pc
    i wander what make it failed .

    This is what worked for me. I had to create a brand new package and push it out to the DP's. Then updated my Task Sequence with the new package. It worked perfectly for me. I hope this helps.

  • RFC destination BW could not be created in the source system

    Hi,
    Recently I installed  BI 7.0 on Win 2003 and try to create a SAP system in RSA1.
    I try to connect R/3 system (on UNIX) and getting RFC connection error u201CRFC user logon failed. Check the connection.u201D  & u201CRFC destination BW could not be created in the source systemu201D. However, I test the connection and it is working fine.
    Please suggest the solution.
    Regards,
    Rajesh

    Rajesh,
    Answer is very simple. I did get same kind of problem. It is very simple answer depending on your R3 version.
    Use password all capital letters. Don't include any small letter at all. unlock your user id and change password to capital letter. BW doesn't like small and capital letter mix. this bug is fixed in ECC 6.0
    <removed_by_moderator>
    *Do not ask for points
    Read the "Rules of Engagement"
    Regards
    RK
    Edited by: Juan Reyes on May 21, 2009 9:30 AM

  • "The home folder could not be created because the network name cannot be found" error in AD users and computers

    Our home folders are stored on a non-windows NAS device and with Windows XP and 2003 we've always got the above error when creating or modifying users home folders, even when the shares were al ready created and being used.
    However this was never really a big issue as the error that popped up was really for information and finshed with a "we've modified the user properties anyway, please create the share manually" type message.
    Unfortunately now we are moving to windows 7 and 2008R2, this last part of the the message is missing and it won't accept the correct value. 
    This issue may be in the way that the NAS device shares the folder, as only the username that matches the folder name can access the share.  This behaviour can't be modified.
    Is there a way to get Windows 7/2008R2 AD users and computers to behave the same way that Windows XP/2003 does , i.e. don't try and create the share just set the value in the user properties  ?
    The AD is still at 2003 level and we can still use Windows XP/2003 clients to make the changes but this is a bit of a limitation.

    The KB article is almost what we have apart from theitalic underlined
    part
    Consider the following scenario:
    You use a domain administrator account to log on to a computer that is running Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
    You use the Active Directory Users and Computers Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in to connect to a domain controller.
    You open the Properties dialog box of a user account.
    The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
    You set the Remote Desktop Services Home Folderattribute to the shared folder path.
    NoteThis attribute is located on the
    Remote Desktop Services Profiletab.
    You click Apply or OK.
    In this scenario, you receive the following error message:
    The home folder could not be created because: The network name cannot be found.
    Note If you click Apply or OK again, no error message is returned. However, the setting is not saved.
    I think the important bit is
    The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
    We manually create the shares on our NAS and then just want to enter the path in the profile tab, I suppose the question is how to we stop it trying to create the shares ?

  • The process could not be created because the maximum number of asynchronous responses (5) has already been reached, and it will be dropped.

    Hi
    he process could not be created because the maximum number of asynchronous responses (5) has already been reached, and it will be dropped.
    Command executed:    "C:\WINDOWS\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe" -command "&G:\SCOM\SCOMModule\Notification\SMS.ps1 -scomalertid:'{c5a013e7-5408-468a-9b04-febab33cc56d}' -alertname:'Common Primary Database TableSpace
    Threshold Alert' -alertdesc:'TableSpace TEMP FreeSizePercent:0.4375\n' -alertstate:'Closed' -alerttime:'7/26/2014 1:55:19 PM' -Priority:'1' -Severity:'2'"
    Working Directory:    g:\SCOM\SCOMModule\Notification
    One or more workflows were affected by this.  
    Workflow name: Subscription852fbf70_40eb_450c_874d_46b631ca1352
    Instance name: Alert Notification Subscription Server
    Instance ID: {E07E3FAB-53BC-BC14-1634-5A6E949F9230}
    Management group:******
    Please help me
    Thanks

    Hi,
    the RMS is "Root Management Server". When you install first management server it becomes RMS. The RMS is relevant in SCOM 2007x management group. You can identify which server is RMS in administration console under management server view. Look for instance
    with "yes" value in "Is RMS" column.
    If you have SCOM 2012x version management group create sugested registry entrys on all management servers (MS) which executes command channel.
    This will surely solve your
    problem.
    Regards,
    Ivan

  • The sent mailbox could not be created on the mail server.

    Complete message says:
    The sent mailbox could not be created on the mail server.  The local "Sent Messages (mail)" mailbox was created instead.  Mail has changed your account's Mailbox Behaviors preferences to use the local "Sent Messages (mail)" mailbox.
    I am using a gmail account with my own domain.  Any ideas how to fix it?

    Menu: Mailbox -> User This Mailbox For
    First, select folders of your IMAP account, and map them to different common folders.

  • Error "codepage could not be determined for the receiver-system"

    Hi,
    we use the idoc-adapter to send message from mySAP ERP to PI.
    All worked fine.
    So, this morning I have changed the datatype of the messageId from "char" to "int" in mySAP ERP in the customizing menue (install param). So, no message received in SAP PI.
    When I start transction "we05" in mySAPERP" I get the following error:
    "codepage could not be determined for the receiver-system" status 02.
    I have changed the datatyp to "char" but the same probleme
    Can anybody help me please?
    Regards
    Stefan

    This error shouldn't occur unless there is some modification at the OS level codepages.
    Please check the entried in the RFC destination for connecting to the XI system. Unicode settings.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • RDS Gateway 2012, RemoteApp Displays "A Revocation check could not be performed for the Certificate" via RDWEB

    I have searched through the forums and there are a number of posts that are similar but all the checks they list seem to not apply to this one.
    My current setup is as follows
    All Servers are 2012 R2
    1 x DC server
    1 x RDS Gateway server with RDS Web installed
    1 x Session Host Server
    Certificate supplied by godaddy with 5 names. (included is the name of the RDS Gateway/Web server in the certificate, the internal name of the session host server is not included as the internal names are differnet to the external)
    My tests are as follows
    Navigating to the RDSWEB page from a machine inside the same network (windows 7 sp1) but not on the same domain is fine no errors and logging in and launching any published application is fine with no errors.
    However logging in on another machine that is external from the network (windows 7 sp1) is ok up to the point of launching any of the published apps I get the error about ""A Revocation check could not be performed for the Certificate". this
    prompts twice but does allow you to continue and login and use the app till the next time. If I view the certificate from the warning message all appears to be ok with all certs in the chain.
    I have imported the root and intermediate certs to each of the gateway/rdsweb server and session host server into the computer cert store just to be on the safe side. This has not helped, I have also run the following command from both windows 7 machines
    with no errors on either
    certutil -f –urlfetch -verify c:\export.cer
    I cant seem to see where this is failing and I am beginning to think there is something wrong with godaddy cert itself somehow.
    If I skip rdsweb and just use MSTSC with the gateway server settings then I can login to any machine on the network with no errors so this is only related to launching published apps on the 2012 R2 RDWEB or session host servers.
    Any help appreciated

    Hi,
    1. Please make sure the client PCs have mstsc.exe (6.3.9600) installed.
    2. If you are seeing a name mismatch error, you can set the published name via this cmdlet:
    Change published FQDN for Server 2012 or 2012 R2 RDS Deployment
    http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Change-published-FQDN-for-2a029b80
    To be clear, the above cmdlet changes the name that shows up next to Remote computer on the prompt you see when launching a RemoteApp.  You should have a DNS A record on your internal network pointing to the private ip address of your RDCB server. 
    Additionally, in RD Gateway Manager, Properties of your RD RAP, Network Resource tab, you should select Allow users to connect to any network resource or if you choose to use RD Gateway Managed group you will need to add all of the appropriate names to the
    group.
    For example, when launching a RemoteApp you would see something like Remote computer: rdcb.domain.com and Gateway server: gateway.domain.com .  Both of these names need to be on your GoDaddy certificate.
    Please verify the above and reply back so that we may assist you further if needed.  It is possible you have an issue with the revocation check but I would like you to make sure that the above is in place first.
    Thanks.
    -TP
    Thanks for the response.
    To be clear I am only seeing a name mismatch and revocation error if I assign a self signed cert to the session host as advised earlier in the thread by "Dharmesh Solanki", if I remove this and assign the 3rd party certificate I then
    just get the revocation error , I have already ran the powershell to change the FQDN's but this has not resolved the issue although the RDP connection details now match the external url for RDWEB when looking at one of the remoteapp files. The workspace
    ID still shows an internal name though inside this same file. 
    RD Gateway is already set to connect any resource, when connecting using remote app both names (RDCB/RDGateway) show as being correct and are contained within the same UCC certificate. I also already have a DNS entry for the Connection broker pointing to
    the internal ip.
    Do you know if the I need the internal name of the session host servers contained within the same UCC certificate seeing as they are different fqdn's than what I am using for external access ? I resigned the UCC certificate and included the internal name
    of the session host server to see if this would help but for some reason I am still seeing the revocation error. I will check on a windows 8 client pc this evening to see if this gets any further as the majority of the testing has been done on windows 7 sp1
    client pc's
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for