Oracle 10.2.0.1.0 on Windows 2003 AS

I have moved jobs and inherited the following database:
Oracle 10.2.0.1.0 EE on Windows 2003 AS EE.
There seem to be a number of issues on the server.
ORA-27300: Message 27300 not found. No message file for Product=RDBMS
ORA-12518: Listener could not hand off client connection
ORA-4030: signaled during : Create Bigfile tablespace....
As stated, the database is on Windows 2003 AS EE with 10Gb of Ram with PAE switch in the boot.ini.
SGA_target =1200M
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET=399M
Processes=2000
Dedicated connection.
After spotting these issues in the alert log, my first advice was upgrade to the latest patch set, because the memory settings appear to be fine & it's obviously good practice to be on the latest patch set. Has anyone had these issues before?
I suppose what I am asking is would you...
a: Log an SR? (I imagine I will be asked to patch)
b: Assume that I have hit some bug and patch to the latest release?
c: Try increasing the PGA_AGGREGATE TARGET and letting system set the pagefile size automatically?
Many thanks for your help,
Regards
User629216

a: Log an SR? (I imagine I will be asked to patch)When you are in doubt and not knowing where to start, contact Oracle support is logical choice. And following their advice is also logical choice.
b: Assume that I have hit some bug and patch to the
latest release?Since you are running maiden version of major release, apply patch is advised.
c: Try increasing the PGA_AGGREGATE TARGET and
letting system set the pagefile size automatically?
At this point it's hard to tell the problem anywhere related to pga_aggregate_target setting.
You should look into the errors you had,
ORA-27300: Message 27300 not found. No message file for Product=RDBMSthe actual error message is
ORA-27300: OS system dependent operation:string
failed with status: string Cause: OS system call errorIt looks like your Oracle installation has some problem. Or ORACLE_HOME is not properly set.
ORA-12518: Listener could not hand off client connectionCheck metalink
New Connections to the Database lead to ORA-12518 or TNS-12518
Doc ID: Note:340089.1

Similar Messages

  • Migrate Oracle EBS 12.1.3 from Microsoft Windows 2003 32-Bit to Linux

    Hi
    We are currently using Oracle EBS 12.1.3 on Microsoft Windows 2003 32-Bit. We are planning to migrate to linux. I have gone through the certification matrix and the following versions certified with Oracle EBS 12.1.3
    1. Linux x86 Oracle Linux 5
    2. Linux x86 Oracle Linux 4
    3. Linux x86 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
    4. Linux x86 SLES 10
    Question #
    1Q) I would like to know is there any linux freeware which is certified with Oracle EBS 12.1.3
    2Q) Also please let me know which documents I need to follow to migrate Oracle EBS 12.1.3 from Microsoft Windows to Linux

    1Q) I would like to know is there any linux freeware which is certified with Oracle EBS 12.1.3No.
    2Q) Also please let me know which documents I need to follow to migrate Oracle EBS 12.1.3 from Microsoft Windows to LinuxApplication Tier Platform Migration with Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 [ID 438086.1]
    To migrate the database you can use export/import or transportable tablespaces -- Refer to these docs for details:
    Export/Import Process for Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 using 10gR2 [ID 454616.1]
    Export/import process for R12 using 11gR1 or 11gR2 [ID 741818.1]
    Using Transportable Database to migrate E-Business Suite R12 Using Oracle Database 10gR2 or 11g [ID 734763.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Oracle Database 10.2.0.3 on Windows 2003 x64

    We are looking to migrate our 2 Oracle database servers from old Windows Server 2003 machine to our new HP-G5 Windows Server 2003 64-bits. We're using ESX Server with Windows Server 2003 Virtual Machine and our 10.2.0.2 are running fine. Some months ago a consultant warned us from installing the 10.2.0.3 upgrade for some stability bugs on Windows Servers were to be found.
    As the new CPU (Jan 2008) is not available for Windows Server 2003 64-bits for Oracle 10.2.0.2, I would like to upgrade from 10.2.0.2 to 10.2.0.3. I would like to apply these patches to our OAS too. Is anyone had exprience any issue with this kind of configuration ?
    Configuration :
    Database is on a Virtual Machine which we allow 4Gb RAM and a Quad Core.
    Windows Server 2003 Enterprise 64-bits.
    Our Application Servers 10.2.0.2 run on Windows 2003 32-bits.
    We're still using Oracle Forms & Reports 10.1.2.0.2.
    We also use Oracle Discoverer 10g.
    We also use a failover system with EMC Legato.

    Before proceeding with the Virtual Machine, I suggest you to refer to this Metalink Note> Certified Software on Oracle VM
         Doc ID:      Note:464754.1
    This doesn't seem to be a supported platform, so if you ever find an issue after upgrade you may find your production system unsupported by Oracle.
    ~ Madrid

  • Oracle (Linux) to MS SQL Server 2000 (Windows 2003) with OTG

    I have Oracle 9i Release 1 running on linux and i want to use Transparent Gateway to connect to MS SQL Server 2000 running on Windows 2003. Is it possible to setup this connection?
    If yes, please include the detail approach of installation.
    Thank you....

    Dear kgronau
    i tried the transperent gateway in Win2003
    both sqlserver and oracle 10 g onthe same os (win2003)
    Created listener and tnsname settings as per the documention spec..
    then created a database link for sqlserver here.
    my transpernet gateway works without any problem,
    Then,
    I have Oracle on Linux also,
    i created a tnsname settings here for the win2003 listener (for sqlserver connection).
    then created a database link for sqlserver here
    im not able to connect sqlserver.
    i tried to desc one table (sqlserver)
    the following error i get,
    do you have any idea, what i have missed???
    SQL> DESC CUSTOMERS@SQLDB
    ERROR:
    ORA-02068: following severe error form SQLDB
    ORA-03135: connection lost contact
    please give some hints what is the problem
    remember the listener is running on windows 2003
    regards

  • Oracle HTTP Server download bandwidth limited on Windows 2003 Server

    Hi,
    we have an ApEx application with the following configuration on the server:
    OS: Windows 2003 Server 64Bit
    DB: 10.2.0.3 64bit
    HTTP Server: the one that comes on the companion CD of Oracle DB 10g 32 bit
    and after the bandwidth in the datacenter where the server resides was increased, I discovered a problem related to the server download bandwidth. I found on Metalink a Note [568075.1 - HTTP Server File Download Speed Is Slow |https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=568075.1] , but unfortunately not a very clear resolution given the fact that we use Oracle DB SEOne, so options 1 & 2 will involve additional licenses costs.
    I tried option 3 suggested in the note by using the HTTP Server that comes with 11g (I assume this is a supported configuration also from licenses point of view HTTP Server from 11g on top of Oracle DB 10g) and I got a boost in performance but the bandwidth is still 70% compared to the bandwidth I get when downloading from the IIS on the same server.
    Has anyone went through this exercise and found a solution for fully using the server bandwidth without needing to go for option 4 in the note, using Linux :), as in our case this will involve again additional licenses and/or hardware costs as the HTTP Server that comes with the DB has to be installed on the machine where the DB is installed?
    Thanks in advance,
    Florin

    Ooops ... things like this happen with Oracle Support, no answer?
    Can you tell me anyway the SR number or the SR title so that I can write it in the SR I make? Like that maybe Oracle Support will work harder on the case, as there are more customers hitting the same problem.
    Anyway in the meanwhile, I run some tests with the original Apache and this one works like a charm even in Windows 2003 Server. What remains now to be done is to use the Open Source Apache as proxy to the HTTP Server, as it looks like it handles much better the static content, it supports also mod_gzip or mod_deflate, but does not support mod_plsql :(. So I think the combination of the two: will do the work for me, but it is really a pity that I have to configure 2 web servers because the HTTP Server has flaws in it :(. Hopefully these will be fixed soon

  • Login user id is invalid in oracle 11i apps 11.5.8 on windows 2003 server

    Dear All,
    I Installed oracle 11i apps 11.5.8 on windows server, when I try to start ie browser
    with user administrator and password, it is showing me, user id is invalid, try to login in again.
    and on the status bar down it is showing loginscript_logonsubmit().
    I can login with sql+ as apps/apps.
    Anybody can help me out.
    Thanks in advance,
    best regards,
    Ather Hussain
    [email protected]

    your problem is not very unusual... I also faced the similar situation cpl of times when Oracle was not able to continue the installation coz the Immediate Shutdown was failed. Actually During the installation, Oracle mounts/opens the database and shuts it down many times and few times, Oracle is unable to shutdown cleanly as some process is hanging or not responding.
    Piece of advise is that always use staging area to install Apps as it takes long time on Win2K (anything between 4-12 hrs) to install it and CDROM Access is lot slower than HDD. Also, it will prompt u every time to insert tbe CD. All this hassle can be bypassed by using the staging area. Read the Installation help document on how to create it.
    For failure reasons, look in ur installation log file which is created in the default Temp folder usually C:\documents and settings\USERNAME\local settings\temp for WinXP or C:\winnt\documents and settings\USERNAME\local settings\temp for Win2K.
    post or email me at [email protected] or [email protected] for further help/details.

  • Installation of Oracle 10g und 9i Database on one Windows 2003 Srv System

    Hello,
    I would like to install Oracle 9i and 10g database on the same server.
    OS is Windows 2003 Server default.
    I already read that i must do some adjustments (regarding ORACLE_HOME / SIDs ..)
    anyone here who knows something about this ?
    Thank you
    Philip

    Yep.
    Install 9i and when it asks for a port to install the listener pick something other than 1521. (1522 should work).
    Then the Oracle 10g installation should go without a hitch.
    ~Jer

  • Oracle discoverer 9i can not running at windows 2003 server

    Hi, Please help me.
    When I upgrade from windows 2000 advance server to windows 2003 server the oracle discoverer 9i can not be open. When I open it there is a error "Failed to open document"
    How to make it run smoothly at windows 2003 server?
    Thank You

    Hi,
    This is a bug in your version of Discoverer. There is a patch to make it work with windows 2003 or you can upgrade your Discoverer to a later version. The patch should be available from Oracle support. I don't know of anyway to make your version work with 2003.
    Rod West

  • Oracle 10gR2 (10.2.0.1) on Windows 2003 Server

    I have installed the above version on Windows 2003 Server(x64). Now we are planning on clustering the same for production environment. I would like to know the following.
    1. Can std edition can be installed on this cluster?
    2. If so, what are the components that has to be installed?
    3. If only EE will work for clustering, we are not going to do RAC? what is the other source?
    Any information/links for the above information is greatly appreciated.
    Thank you in advance.

    Dear,
    You can go for OracleFS(failsafe). It is a Acive Passive clustering method unlike RAC.

  • Oracle Financial 11.5.10.2 on Windows 2003 Installation Problem

    When I install the Oracle Finanacial the Rapidwiz show the error
    Oxcf9302f0 referenced memory at Oxcf9302f0. The memory could not be read.
    and after this the error shown
    RW-20013: Error: - Not enough free disk space on system:
    Database ORACLE_HOME = e:\oracle\visdb\9.2.0
    required = 2800.0
    actual = 0.0
    filespace.exe has shown error
    While in Drive E: has 60 GB free space
    What is the problem

    Database ORACLE_HOME = e:\oracle\visdb\9.2.0
    While in Drive E: has[b] 60 GB free spaceFor 11i, the total space required for a single node system, not including the stage area, is 57 GB for a fresh install with a production database, and 91 GB for a fresh install with a Vision Demo database.

  • Oracle E-Business Suite R12 Install on Windows 2003 - FRM-92101

    I have completed the install and can log into the application, however, when I try to access a forms I get an error FRM-92101.
    FRM-92101: There was a failure in the Forms Server during startup.
    This could happen due to invalid configuration.
    Please look into the web-server log file for details.
    The symptoms see to be the same as in Metalink2 Doc ID Link: [429627.1|https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:1491198142809682374::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,429627.1,1,1,1,helvetica]
    That Doc ID suggests running "make -f ins_forms.mk install", however, I am unable to get this to work. Is anyone able to help.

    The error you get online is
    FRM-92101: There was a failure in the Forms Server during startup.
    This could happen due to invalid configuration.
    Please look into the web-server log file for details.
    The file $INST_TOP/logs/ora/10.1.3/j2ee/forms/forms_default_group_1/application.log contains
    09/01/10 17:19:01.812 10.1.3.0.0 Started
    09/01/10 17:19:43.453 formsweb: FormsServlet init():
    configFileName: e:\oracle\VIS\inst\apps\VIS_succeed-ebs12\ora/10.1.2/forms/server/appsweb.cfg
    testMode: false
    09/01/10 17:19:43.515 formsweb: 10.1.3.0.0 Started
    09/01/10 17:21:15.46 formsweb: 10.1.3.0.0 Stopped
    09/01/10 17:21:38.484 10.1.3.0.0 Started
    09/01/10 17:21:40.515 formsweb: FormsServlet init():
    configFileName: e:\oracle\VIS\inst\apps\VIS_succeed-ebs12\ora/10.1.2/forms/server/appsweb.cfg
    testMode: false
    09/01/10 17:21:40.515 formsweb: 10.1.3.0.0 Started
    09/01/10 17:41:17.140 formsweb: 10.1.3.0.0 Stopped
    09/01/10 17:48:33.484 10.1.3.0.0 Started
    09/01/10 17:48:36.171 formsweb: FormsServlet init():
    configFileName: e:\oracle\VIS\inst\apps\VIS_succeed-ebs12\ora/10.1.2/forms/server/appsweb.cfg
    testMode: false
    09/01/10 17:48:36.187 formsweb: 10.1.3.0.0 Started
    09/01/10 17:59:34.484 formsweb: ListenerServlet init()
    09/01/10 18:03:09.984 formsweb: Forms session <1> failed during startup: no response from runtime process
    09/01/10 18:03:09.984 formsweb: Forms session <1> exception stack trace:
    oracle.forms.engine.RunformException: Forms session <1> failed during startup: no response from runtime process
    at oracle.forms.servlet.RunformProcess.connect(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.forms.servlet.RunformProcess.dataToRunform(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.forms.servlet.RunformSession.dataToRunform(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.forms.servlet.ListenerServlet.doPost(Unknown Source)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:763)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856)
    at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.0.0) ].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:719)
    at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.0.0) ].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:376)
    at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.0.0) ].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.doProcessRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:870)
    at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.0.0) ].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:451)
    at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.0.0) ].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:299)
    at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.0.0) ].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:187)
    at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketReadHandler$SafeRunnable.run(ServerSocketReadHandler.java:260)
    at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.0.0) ].util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
    09/01/12 11:33:51.531 formsweb: 10.1.3.0.0 Stopped
    The file $INST_TOP/logs/ora/10.1.3/Apache/?????? contains
    [Sat Jan 10 17:18:42 2009] [error] Server ran out of threads to serve requests. Consider raising the ThreadsPerChild setting
    [Sat Jan 10 17:22:52 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.40] [ecid: 1231608172:192.168.1.40:1264:3120:4,0] File does not exist: e:/oracle/vis/inst/apps/vis_succeed-ebs12/portal/oa_html/jtfTestCookie.jsp
    [Sat Jan 10 17:23:07 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.40] [ecid: 1231608187:192.168.1.40:1264:1980:1,0] File does not exist: e:/oracle/vis/inst/apps/vis_succeed-ebs12/portal/oa_html/jtfTestCookie.jsp
    [Sat Jan 10 17:41:00 2009] [error] Server ran out of threads to serve requests. Consider raising the ThreadsPerChild setting
    [Sat Jan 10 17:54:47 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.40] [ecid: 1231610087:192.168.1.40:3956:2720:2,0] File does not exist: e:/oracle/vis/inst/apps/vis_succeed-ebs12/portal/favicon.ico
    [Sat Jan 10 17:59:33 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.40] [ecid: 1231610373:192.168.1.40:3956:2848:10,0] Directory index forbidden by rule: e:/oracle/vis/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/
    [Sat Jan 10 18:03:10 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.40] [ecid: 1231610590:192.168.1.40:3956:2848:17,0] File does not exist: e:/oracle/vis/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/oracle/forms/engine/RunformBundle_en_GB.class
    [Sat Jan 10 18:03:10 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.40] [ecid: 1231610590:192.168.1.40:3956:2848:18,0] File does not exist: e:/oracle/vis/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/oracle/forms/engine/RunformBundle_en_GB.properties
    [Sat Jan 10 18:03:10 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.40] [ecid: 1231610590:192.168.1.40:3956:2848:19,0] File does not exist: e:/oracle/vis/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/oracle/ewt/alert/resource/AlertBundle_en_GB.class
    [Sat Jan 10 18:03:10 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.40] [ecid: 1231610590:192.168.1.40:3956:2848:20,0] File does not exist: e:/oracle/vis/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/oracle/ewt/alert/resource/AlertBundle_en_GB.properties

  • Error while running setup.exe for oracle installation on windows 2003

    Hi,
    I am trying to install oracle 9.2.0.1 on my windows 2003 machine and when i click on setup.exe nothing happens. when i tried to run it thru command prompt again nothing happens when i check in computer management => event views it throws following error.
    The application, C:\DOCUME~1\barb\Local Settings\Temp\1\OraInstall2006-08-11_05-19-46AM\jre\bin\javaw.exe, generated an application error The error occurred on 08/11/2006 @ 05:19:56.356 The exception generated was c0000005 at address 6D4CF9A0 (jvm!JVM_TraceMethodCalls)
    can anybody suggest me what could be the problem or i will have to install jvm first and then try installing oracle?
    thanks
    Chandan

    did you check the installation guide and Preinstallation Requirements?
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/install.102/b14316/reqs.htm#i1011417

  • Oracle 10G slow Performance on Windows 2003 Server

    Hi there,
    Looking for a little assistance in locating a bottleneck that's started to hit our system this week. It's really odd because it's been starting around 10am every morning this week.
    today is the worst that I've seen it because it's almost brought the system to a halt.....
    We're running Oracle 10.2.0.1 64b on Windows 2003 Server 64
    The server has 16 processors and 64GB of RAM currently the CPU is sitting at 5% and the RAM usage is at 16.4GB
    It's a blade server with a SAN backend and I'm assuming the latency is coming from the disk but I need to determine this for a fact.
    I've only been a DBA for about a year and I'm stilling learing how to locate and identify issues. According to OEM I'm seeing
    a ton of I/O from the users. So anyways, any help or insight would be much appreciated and a learning experience for me.
    Thank you for your time and asistance.
    SB

    Thank you for the reply!
    We've had finding one FOREVER, I can't resolve it and I've read somewhere to ignore because OEM is false reporting. I'm adjusting DB_Cache now...
    Isn't possible that too much cache could be bad for the system and cause slow downs?
    FINDING 1: 100% impact (29725 seconds)
    Significant virtual memory paging was detected on the host operating system.
       RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 100% benefit (29725 seconds)
          ACTION: Host operating system was experiencing significant paging but no
             particular root cause could be detected. Investigate processes that
             do not belong to this instance running on the host that are consuming
             significant amount of virtual memory. Also consider adding more
             physical memory to the host.
       RECOMMENDATION 2: DB Configuration, 100% benefit (29725 seconds)
          ACTION: Consider enabling Automatic Shared Memory Management by setting
             the parameter "sga_target" to control the amount of SGA consumed by
             this instance.
    FINDING 2: 51% impact (15210 seconds)
    The buffer cache was undersized causing significant additional read I/O.
       RECOMMENDATION 1: DB Configuration, 9% benefit (2685 seconds)
          ACTION: Increase the buffer cache size by setting the value of parameter
             "db_cache_size" to 7568 M.
       ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
          The value of parameter "db_cache_size" was "6912 M" during the analysis
          period.
       SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
          SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
                   (84% impact [25073 seconds])

  • Oracle 11.1.0.7.0 patch 5 for windows 2003 x64.. Please help.

    Hello All
    I have Oracle EE 11.1.0.7.0 running on Windows 2003 x64 server plus ASM, and I want to apply patch 5, so that it becomes 11.1.0.7.5.
    I came to know from Oracle Support Services, Windows patche comes as bundled patchset, but I am not sure which patch to apply, there are 38 of them. Is 11.1.0.7.5P the correct one?.
    Patchset Avaialble:
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 38 (11.1.0.7.38P) 32-Bit Patch:11741169 64-Bit (x64) Patch:11741170
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 37 (11.1.0.7.37P) 32-Bit Patch:10636464 64-Bit (x64) Patch:10636465
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 36 (11.1.0.7.36P) 32-Bit Patch:10350787 64-Bit (x64) Patch:10350788
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 35 (11.1.0.7.35P) 32-Bit Patch:10245099 64-Bit (x64) Patch:10245101
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 34 (11.1.0.7.34P) 32-Bit Patch:10168052 64-Bit (x64) Patch:10168056
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 33 (11.1.0.7.33P) 32-Bit Patch:9773817 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9773825
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 32 (11.1.0.7.32P) 32-Bit Patch:9930894 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9930895
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 31 (11.1.0.7.31P) 32-Bit Patch:9846179 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9846180
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 30 (11.1.0.7.30P) 32-Bit Patch:9869911 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9869912
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 29 (11.1.0.7.29P) 32-Bit Patch:9718019 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9718020
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 28 (11.1.0.7.28P) 32-Bit Patch:9707661 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9707665
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 27 (11.1.0.7.27P) 32-Bit Patch:9604444 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9604446
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 26 (11.1.0.7.26P) 32-Bit Patch:9523179 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9523181
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 25 (11.1.0.7.25P) 32-Bit Patch:9392331 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9392335
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 24 (11.1.0.7.24P) 32-Bit Patch:9384493 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9384497
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 23 (11.1.0.7.23P) 32-Bit Patch:9264211 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9264214
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 22 (11.1.0.7.22P) 32-Bit Patch:9166858 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9166861
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 21 (11.1.0.7.21P) 32-Bit Patch:9082702 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9082709
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 20 (11.1.0.7.20P) 32-Bit Patch:9025140 64-Bit (x64) Patch:9025144
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 19 (11.1.0.7.19P) 32-Bit Patch:8928976 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8928977
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 18 (11.1.0.7.18P) 32-Bit Patch:8832980 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8832986
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 17 (11.1.0.7.17P) 32-Bit Patch:8783655 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8783657
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 16 (11.1.0.7.16P) 32-Bit Patch:8689191 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8689199
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 15 (11.1.0.7.15P) 32-Bit Patch:8655458 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8655460
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 14 (11.1.0.7.14P) 32-Bit Patch:8603948 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8603952
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 13 (11.1.0.7.13P) 32-Bit Patch:8553512 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8553515
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 12 (11.1.0.7.12P) 32-Bit Patch:8508245 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8508247
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 11 (11.1.0.7.11P) 32-Bit Patch:8451592 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8451598
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 10 (11.1.0.7.10P) 32-Bit Patch:8416539 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8416540
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 9 (11.1.0.7.9P) 32-Bit Patch:8343061 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8343070
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 8 (11.1.0.7.8P) 32-Bit Patch:8297200 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8297201
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 7 (11.1.0.7.7P) 32-Bit Patch:8260294 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8260301
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 6 (11.1.0.7.6P) 32-Bit Patch:8219259 64-Bit (x64) Patch:8219268
    *11.1.0.7.0 Patch 5 (11.1.0.7.5P) 32-Bit Patch:7712568 64-Bit (x64) Patch:7712570*
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 4 (11.1.0.7.4P) 32-Bit Patch:7682184 64-Bit (x64) Patch:7682189
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 3 (11.1.0.7.3P) 32-Bit Patch:7664953 64-Bit (x64) Patch:7675231
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 2 (11.1.0.7.2P) 32-Bit Patch:7586190 64-Bit (x64) Patch:7586195
    11.1.0.7.0 Patch 1 (11.1.0.7.1P) Only available in 32-Bit Patch:7540527
    Any help would be great.
    Regards
    Amit

    Hi All
    I have applied this patch 38 for Oracle 11.1.0.7.0 on Windows 2003 x64 bit server today but the database version from v$version didn't change at all and still its showing 11.1.0.7.0, I expected it to show 11.1.0.7.5.
    Any suggestions.
    Regards
    Amit

  • Concurrent Manager Issue in Oracle Apps 11i on MS Windows 2003

    Hi,
    We have Oracle Apps 11i (11.5.10) on Windows 2003 running Oracle Financilas and Supply Chain.
    From this morning onwards, concurrent requests are not getting completed. All requests are showing Running Normally. I checked the server (Single Node 4 GB Memory) and CPU usage is more than 90%. Task Manager is showing 50% CPU usage for SYSTEM (Image Name). Once the CPU usage for SYSTEM(image name) goes beyond 40% then the server is becoming slow and the problem starts.
    When I stop the Concurrent Manager it does not stop and I have to End Process the FNDLIBR process manually.
    I have recreated the concurrent manager using CCMSETUP and also ran cmclean.sql. Nothing is helping.
    System is Live since 2006 and the issue started only today.
    Please suggest any solutions as this is happening in our Production system.
    Thanks.
    Thiru

    Thiru,
    Which concurrent manager consumes the CPU usage? Are you able to identify it?
    Any errors in the CM log file? Did you try to start the CM with diag=y and see if any errors are reported in the log files?
    What happen to the CPU usage when you stop the CM?
    I assume that you are running Purge Concurrent Manager/Requests on regular basis, so this should not be an issue here.
    Please review the following notes, and see if it helps.
    Note: 114380.1 - Concurrent Manager Processes Taking Lots of CPU
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=114380.1
    Note: 264752.1 - FNDLIBR Consuming Memory Causing CPU Utilization To Increase Daily
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=264752.1
    System is Live since 2006 and the issue started only today.I assume no changes have been done recently, correct?
    Regards,
    Hussein

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can't use the iPod on more than one computer!!!!!!!

    Ok, This has got me so frustrated! We got an iPod and installed iTunes. We thought we had it figured out - we purchased music from iTunes, played it on the iPod and everything was great. Then plugged the iPod into my other computer to listen to our m

  • Normal home page (Google) supplanted by Zugo. What gives?

    Previously, when I envoked Firefox 3.6, I went straight to a Google search page - that's what I wanted. I tried to d/l a MS DVD decoder and got something called PlayIt instead. The address line when I try to start Firefox turns to http://playitall.zu

  • Will iDvd'08 work on ext. firwire HD as a  boot volume?

    Answer is YES! Just finished testing iDvd'08 on an ext HD as a boot volume (mac os extended with X.4.11) and all latest updates for iLife'08. And finally got iDvd'08 working well. However it is slower than internal HD .... but it still works via fire

  • Why no Vista 64 bit compatibility for Lightroom 5?

    Please don't point me to the system requirements; I've already read again and again that Only Windows 7 or 8 are compatible with LR5. What I want to know is WHY was Vista 64 bit supported with the Lightroom 5 Beta but now not for the current full rel

  • Photoshop/lightroom migration from PC to MAC..

    I have had the photoshop/lightroom $9.99/month plan on my PC laptop since February 2014.  I just purchased a MacBook pro and would like to transfer the software to that computer.  How do I go about this without having to change my monthly payments?