Oracle 11.2 in Solaris 10 non-global zone?

When I try to install in a non-global zone in Solaris 10, the installer system check fails; I think this problem is well-known, but I can't find the guidance notes any more. The generic documentation isn't much help, I'm afraid. This is what I get from the system check, all round:
Expected Value: n/a
Actual Value: n/a
Not long ago I had a link to some notes that addressed thisproblem specifically, but I can't find them any more, unfortunately - does anybody here know?

Check Oracle® Database Installation Guide 10g Release 2 (10.2) for Solaris Operating System.

Similar Messages

Install Oracle Database 11g in a non-global Zone

Hi Folks
If everyone install a Oracle 11g database in a non-global zone, please give me some advice.
Is there any requirements (Packages) in the global zone?
Some special about the Installation process?
Any documents or best practice?
Best regards
Martin

If your using full root non-global zones, then it would be the same as installing it on the global zone. This how we do it at my work, we install the DB on a full root zone, that is the only zone on a global zone or the other zone is a very light load.

How to create a separate /var partition on solaris non-global zone

Hi
I found no simple way to create a separate /var partition in solaris non-global zone.
I am using solaris 10 u9 and my root pool is zfs. My zone's zonepath is also separate zfs fs.
But, I do not know how to make the /var as a mountpoint of another zfs dataset since /var is not empty.
I also do not know if there is a way to install a zone with /var as a separate (outside '/') partition.
That will be really useful.
Any suggestion?
Thanks
Edited by: vadud3 on Sep 20, 2010 12:16 PM

I meant a separate zfs fs with mountpoint '/var' in a non-global zone.
I am insisting, because I do not want /var to fill up the '/' on non-global zone.
With default non-global zone installation, you cannot avoid that.
My zonepath itself is a zfs fs. I also have a zfs dataset provisioned to the non-global zone.
I cannot create a zfs fs out of that dataset and mount it as '/var' becasue by then non-global zone
already installed content on '/var'
I want the '/var' as a separate dir or mountpoint, the same reason global zone gives you that option during install.
Thanks

Netbackup with Solaris non-global zone!

Hi,
How to install and configure netbackup into Solaris 10 non-global zone? what steps need to follow?
Thanks
Tanvir

I agree with running from the global zone. The added benefit is that if you backup the root of all zonepaths, then when you add any new non-global within that path, the new server will be automatically backed up.
We had been installing the client on each server both global and non-global in the past. On our non-global zones, /usr is not writeable but /opt is. We would symlink /usr/openv to /opt/openv from the global and then remotely install the client software from the backup master via
"/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/install_client_files ssh <client>"

How to install Oracle 10g on Solaris 10 non-global zone.

Hi,
I want to install Oracle 10g on Solaris non global zone with ASM.
I need complete doc for doing the same.
REgards
S.Ali

Check Oracle® Database Installation Guide 10g Release 2 (10.2) for Solaris Operating System.

Oracle 10 g non-global zones with asynchronous I/O

Hi,
I note that using direct I/O (by setting the forcedirectio while
mounting the database file systems) and bypassing the file system
cache may improve database performance significantly, but this should
be done only for file systems in which database files and redo log
files exist. If direct I/O is used and there is not enough database
buffer cache, it may even decrease the performance by moving the
problem from double buffering to a lack of database buffer cache. So,
this performance tuning must be planned carefully, and the database
buffer cache should be sized properly. The direct I/O option should
not be used for other file systems used by other applications because
they still need the UFS buffer cache.
Now, I have Oracle database installed inside a non-global zone and I
see a lot of Asynchronous I/O wait warnings in the Oracle Alert log
file. Storage mount points with UFS filesystem contain the Oracle
datafiles and redo log files. In addition, two Oracle datafiles of 10
GB each reside on the local disks. The Oracle init.ora parameter to
set asynchronous I/O for Oracle database files is
FILESYSTEMIO_OPTIONS= SETALL.
Although the above parameter was set during the database installation,
the aiowait warnings don't seem to disappear.
Can I use the "forcedirectio" option at the Operating System /etc/
vfstab file for Oracle datafiles and redo log files?
Or, should I just move the Oracle database files residing on the local
disks to the external storage? Will this take care of aiowait warnings
and if yes, how? The storage is a DAS.
Regards
Sandeep

I presume you compiled php on the Sun server, was this done using gcc or the Sun One C compiler.
If the latter then you can also use the flag: --enable-nonportable-atomics when you run configure

Always install applications into non-global zones?

I am planning on taking full advantage of Containers and Zones as I migrate servers and applications to Solaris 10. During this migration process, I believe that I will have a need to initially just run just one application on a server. I fear that if I do this in the global zone I will lose flexibility down the road for future projects and workloads. So, should I consider always installing applications in a non-global zone and never install applications in the global zone? This would keep the global zone as the controller of the non-global zones and ensure that I can always add more non-global zones later without having to worry about what is running in the global zone.
Are there any thoughts or comments on this topic?

Yes we've found it's best to run the applications in non-global zones. Here are a few benefits, basically we only put an application in the global zone if it requires it (like Oracle RAC). Note non-RAC instances of Oracle will run in a non-global zone just fine.
Reasons to put applications in non-global zones
o Increased security (self contained environment)
o Increased flexibility for provisioning resources (CPU, memory, etc) when/if we decide to run multiple applications on the same hardware
o Increased flexibility in starting up temporary environments to debug issues in parallel to the primary environment (i.e. in another non-global zone on the same server)
o Works well with Sun Cluster (i.e. we cluster the non-global zones so that they can run across several hosts)
o Improved trouble shooting and performance diagnosis as the applications are isolated to a non-global zone
o Simplified environment for the application admins as the environment can be fine tuned for their needs (i.e. only let them see what they need)
o Disaster recovery is much faster for a non-global zone

11gR2 scan and scan listeners are not starting in Solaris non globa zones

Hi,
my configuration is a 2 node RAC. each node is a solaris container/ zones on two phyiscally different machines.
(SunOS 5.10 Generic_147440-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise).
after installation of GI, root.sh was successful but failed when trying to start the following resources
ora.scan1.vip
ora.scan2.vip
ora.scan3.vip
the scans are not in the host file but on DNS, the GI home has been patched with January 2012 GI PSU.
Has any one successfully installed 11gR2 RAC on Solaris non global zones? if you have tell me how you got past the scan issue.
***** rootcrs_db01.log ******
PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan1.vip
CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan2.vip
CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan3.vip
CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan3.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.497 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1536] About to doQueryResources: eType resource, nodeName null, filter (TYPE == ora.scan_vip.type)
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.532 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1544] found 3 resources
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.532 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan1.vip
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.533 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan2.vip
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.533 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan3.vip
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.564 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan1.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.565 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 1
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.587 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan1.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.609 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan2.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.610 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 2
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.631 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan2.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.653 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan3.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.654 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 3
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.674 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan3.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.675 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan1.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.702 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:39.079 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.730 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.731 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.743 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.746 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.750 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan1.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan1.vip' has placement error.
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.752 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan1.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.754 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan2.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.778 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:43.132 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.805 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.806 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.820 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.822 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.826 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan2.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan2.vip' has placement error.
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.827 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan2.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.828 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan3.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.855 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:47.212 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.881 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.883 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.895 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.898 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan3.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.902 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan3.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan3.vip' has placement error.
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.902 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan3.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
thanks in advance
Samuel K

Hi,
Put here
$ srvctl config scan
$ nslookup <scan_name>
$ ping <all scan vip>Regards,
Levi Pereira

Oracle RAC 10g on Solaris 10 in a non-global zone

I need to run Oracle RAC 10g on Solaris 10 in a non-global zone as I must cap the CPUs used for Oracle licensing limitations. My question is a simple one, but one for which I'm getting conflicting information depending upon whom I ask.
If I want to run RAC in a non-global zone on two nodes, does this require the use of Solaris Cluster?
I know there are good reasons to use Solaris Cluster, but the company for which I work cannot afford the additional expense of Solaris Cluster at this time. Is it possible to run Oracle RAC 10g in a capped container without Solaris Cluster or is Solaris Cluster absolutely required?
Thanks in advance for any insight you can provide.

AFAIK, Oracle 10g RAC is not supported in solaris containers.
It is however supported in Solaris zone clusters...in order to use it, you would have to use Sun Cluster 3.2 (iinm).

PHP in Solaris 10 and Non-Global Zones: Problem of performance?

Hi friends
We are feeling a poor performance with applications developed with PHP in Solaris 10, with non-global and global zones, while Intel platform (Xeon and Pentium), performance is very good. Difference between both platforms is about 200% aprox, one second in Intel to 9, 12 or 20 seconds in Solaris depending of model.
Our tests were developed in:
1. SF T2000 server Solaris 10 global zone
2. SF T2000 server Solaris 10 non-global zone
3. SF280R server Solaris 10 non-global zone
4. V240 server with 1 GB memory, 1*US III-i 1.0 GHz and Solaris 9 (really this version for test and comparisons)
5. V240 server with 8GB memory, 2*US III-i 1.5Ghz and Solaris 9 (really this version for test and comparisons too)
Intel platforms were:
1. Intel Pentium 4 2GHz 2GB memory, Linux Fedora and PHP 4.4.4
2. Intel Xeon 2 core, 2.33GHz 2GB memory, Linux Fedora and PHP 4.4.3
Versions of products are:
1. Solaris 9 or Solaris 10
2. PHP 4.4.7 downloaded from http://www.php.net/downloads.php
3. Apache 2.0.59
4. MySQL 4.1.15-log
Our php compilation and installation were:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/php-4.4.7 \
--with-pear \
--with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl \
--with-gettext \
--with-ldap=/usr/local \
--with-iconv \
--enable-ftp \
--with-dom \
--with-mime-magic \
--enable-mbstring \
--with-zlib \
--enable-track-vars \
--enable-sigchild \
--disable-ctype \
--disable-overload \
--disable-tokenizer \
--disable-posix \
--with-gd \
--with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2.0.53/bin/apxs \
--with-mysql \
--with-pgsql \
--with-oci8=/oracle/product/9.2.0 \
--with-oracle=/oracle/product/9.2.0 \
--with-png-dir=/usr/local \
--with-zlib-dir=/usr/local \
--with-freetype-dir=/usr/local \
--with-jpeg-dir=/usr/local
make
make install
Questions:
Is there any problem of PHP with SunFire T2000 servers or 64-bits platforms?
Is there any flag of PHP would be use to compilarion PHP in 64-bits or multithread?
I wait for any comments or suggestions about our problem with PHP compilation and performance in Solaris 10. Thanks a lot.
Sergio.

I presume you compiled php on the Sun server, was this done using gcc or the Sun One C compiler.
If the latter then you can also use the flag: --enable-nonportable-atomics when you run configure

What options do I have to patch the recommended patchset on Solaris 10 with a bunch of non-global zones?

With the standard patching process(installcluster), it takes a looong time since each zone needs veridated. Any option that I can apply the patchset to the global zone only, then later upgrade the non-global zones?
If possible, I'd like to use LU.

You can use LU but it will depend of your system config. There are instructions in the README of the patchset to install it on an alternate boot environment (previously created using lucreate).
If you plan to use LU, read the following docs first to avoid common issues:
Solaris Live Upgrade Software Patch Requirements(Doc ID 1004881.1)
List of currently unsupported Live Upgrade (LU) configurations (Doc ID 1396382.1)
You can also use Parallel Patching feature to improve performance :
https://blogs.oracle.com/patch/entry/zones_parallel_patching_feature_now
Solaris 10 10/09: Zones Parallel Patching to ReducePatching Time (System Administration Guide: Oracle Solaris Containers…
What you can't do is patch the global zone only and the non-global zones later (unless the zones are detached). It's a requirement that the global and non-global stay synchronize at all time (considering that they are sharing the same kernel).

Enable gdm in Solaris 11 non-global zone

I am trying to enable gdm in a fresh solaris 11 NGZ. I installed slim_install and solaris-desktop. gdm will not start, and shows the following:
# svcs -xv gdm
svc:/application/graphical-login/gdm:default (GNOME Display Manager)
State: offline since Thu Jun 14 10:56:54 2012
Reason: Service svc:/system/hal:default is in an invalid state.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-GE
Path: svc:/application/graphical-login/gdm:default
svc:/system/hal:default
Reason: Service svc:/system/dbus:default is temporarily disabled.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-GE
Path: svc:/application/graphical-login/gdm:default
svc:/system/dbus:default
See: man -M /usr/share/man -s 1m gdm
Impact: This service is not running.
# svcs -xv dbus
svc:/system/dbus:default (D-BUS message bus)
State: disabled since Thu Jun 14 12:47:15 2012
Reason: Temporarily disabled by an administrator.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-1S
See: man -M /usr/man -s 1 dbus-daemon
See: /var/svc/log/system-dbus:default.log
Impact: 2 dependent services are not running:
svc:/application/graphical-login/gdm:default
# uname -a
SunOS test-host 5.11 11.0 sun4v sparc sun4v
I gather from reading other threads that dbus will not run in a NGZ, so how can I get gnome desktop manager to start?

Hello,
if you still have not got any answer from oracle support like us, perhaps i can give you a hin to fix this ...
First we changed /etc/gdm/custom.conf
[xdmcp]
Enable=true
Then we changed smf service layout for svc:/application/graphical-login/gdm:default
We deleted dependencies for hal, consolekit and dbus in /lib/svc/manifest/application/graphical-login/gdm.xml
After that we started gdm service, but it failed. THe gdm-binary needs a socket from dbus ...
So we modified dbus start script.
Just comment check for "non-global zone" out in /lib/svc/method/svc-dbus
#if smf_is_nonglobalzone; then
# /usr/sbin/svcadm disable -t svc:/system/dbus
# echo "dbus-daemon cannot be run in non-global zones"
# sleep 5 &
# exit $SMF_EXIT_OK
#fi
then start dbus service and gdm service ...
hope that helps...
Just contact Oracle to deliver update for you !
thanks
Christian

How to unlock Root Account in non-global zone on Solaris 10 Branded Zone

Hello All,
I have a phsical x86 server running Solaris 11. On top of that, I have 3 Solaris 10 branded zones configured. Due to security policy the root account has been locked by 5 failed login attempts.
Is there a way by which I can unlock root account in non-global zone.
I have the root access of global zone.
Pls help as these are production servers.
Regards

Hey,
It worked. Actually i forgot to save the file.
I changed the /<zonepath>/root/etc/shadow
Removed *LK* & then from global zone did zlogin -l root zonename
Thanks lot.

Live upgrade - solaris 8/07 (U4) , with non-global zones and SC 3.2

Dears,
I need to use live upgrade for SC3.2 with non-global zones, solaris 10 U4 to Solaris 10 10/09 (latest release) and update the cluster to 3.2 U3.
i dont know where to start, i've read lots of documents, but couldn't find one complete document to cover the whole process.
i know that upgrade for solaris 10 with non-global zones is supported since my soalris 10 release, but i am not sure if its supported with SC.
Appreciate your help

Hi,
I am not sure whether this document:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/BluePrints/Maintaining+Solaris+with+Live+Upgrade+and+Update+On+Attach
has been on the list of docs you found already.
If you click on the download link, it won't work. But if you use the Tools icon on the upper right hand corner and click on attachements, you'll find the document. Its content is solely based on configurations with ZFS as root and zone root, but should have valuable information for other deployments as well.
Regards
Hartmut

Jdk 1.6 + solaris 10 (global + non global zones)

How to execute or fetch jdk1.6 in global zone when it is installed in the non global zone of solaris 10?
kindly explain in step-by-step procedure
thanks,
Samojit

I have a similar problem with pkgadd. When installing an auditing application we get the following error:
pkagadd: ERROR: unable to make temporary directory </var/tmp//installtEaBs/install9_aG1u>
No changes were made to the system.
This is a package that is being installed remotely using an automated process and the package does install using the pkgadd command on the server. The automation has produced the same or a similar error on several servers while producing no errors and successfully installing on others. We cannot duplicate the error across the board. The packge has been reviewed and has been found to have no errors, the automation process has been evaluated and has done successful jobs on other Solaris 10 servers since failing on the ones with this error. The exact same automated job produces successful and unsuccessful jobs on various servers.
There are 2 patch levels that we have identified 118833-26 and 118833-30. Both the 26 and 30 versions have had successful and unsuccessful installations of the SE agent. There are various subnets involved and all of them have had successful and unsuccessful installations of the SE agent.
If anyone out there has run into this problem before please help me out. This installation is automated on many Solaris 10 servers, and is successful on about 2 out of 3. It is of course the failed jobs that I have to focus on, until we can get it resolved.

Oracle 11.2 in Solaris 10 non-global zone?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for