Oracle 11g Support For WLS 10 and WLS 9.2

Hi,
Does anyone know where I can find out definatively when Weblogic 10 and 9.2 will officially support Oracle 11g ?
Any official BEA sources here.
Cheers
Simon

There is only one real answer here: test it and test it thoroughly. Asking this question here is pointless, you cannot trust anyone here to give you advice you can rely on. Whatever is said, you have to validate the claims anyway.
Or did you think that Oracle employees were going to answer your question? If so, you are sadly mistaken. Oracle charges money for giving technical support.

Similar Messages

Is Oracle 11g released for NW04s and ECC6.0?

Is Oracle 11g released for NW04s and ECC6.0?
Please help. Thanks!

Plain and simple: No, it isn't.
Check the SAP on Oracle homepage [here|SAP on Oracle] in SDN and read the latest development news on this topic including a rough schedule.
regards,
Lars

Oracle 11g support for JDK 1.4

Dear All,
We are planning to migrate from Oracle 10.2.0.3 to Oracle 11.2.0.2. However our application server JDK version is in JDK1.4 and we use ojdbc4.jar for JDBC connectivity.
Please let me know, to migrate to Oracle 11g requires JDK1.5 and ojdbc1.5 or can we continue to stay at JDK1.4 and uses ojdbc4.jar to connect to Oracle11g.
Help Appreciated.

There is only one real answer here: test it and test it thoroughly. Asking this question here is pointless, you cannot trust anyone here to give you advice you can rely on. Whatever is said, you have to validate the claims anyway.
Or did you think that Oracle employees were going to answer your question? If so, you are sadly mistaken. Oracle charges money for giving technical support.

Oracle 10g support for EM64T and Windows 64-bit

Is there support for this configuration either in a patch release for 10g or is it planned for the near future?

Hi,
Oracle 10gR1 is certified for Tru64 UNIX 5.1b.
Certification of Oracle 10gR2 for Tru64 UNIX 5.1b.is planned for 1st quarter 2006.
If it does not support directly, is there a patch available etc..No idea, perhaps can you create an iTAR to post the question.
But if you read the metalink note 283751.1 Pre-Install checks for 10gR1 RDBMS (10.1.x) - Tru64 Platforms, you can see that no workaround provide...
Nicolas.
Message was edited by:
N. Gasparotto
Adding metalink note reference.

Oracle 11g ODBC for Windows NT and Windows 95

Hi
Please does anyone knows where can I find this ODBC ? Oracle 11g ODBC for Windows NT and Windows 95
I have test some ODBC from the Oracle page but doesnt work
Thank you
J.A.

I'm thinking no.
However I did find this which may help :
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/windows/odbcfaq-128251.pdf
I did the search for 16 bit in it and found some interesting information.
The other piece of information I can share is the Oracle 11 client has issues connecting to Oracle 9.
An Oracle 10 clients might have a better chance, but the catch is finding it.
The last client I remember working on these OS's was Oracle 8. But I doubt that will connect to Oracle 11.
Best Regards
mseberg
Edited by: mseberg on Aug 14, 2012 6:06 PM
Later
I'm not a huge fan of when they move stuff. This spot feels a little like the island of misfit toys.

Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3

Hi All,
I have a query regarding Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3.
Does the Oracle 11g R1/R2 Active Data guard feature supported with SAP R3?
I appreciate your help to provide any link or document for the same.
Thanks,
Vihang

I have a query regarding Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3.
Does the Oracle 11g R1/R2 Active Data guard feature supported with SAP R3?
I appreciate your help to provide any link or document for the same.
Oracle database 11g functionality certified by SAP, check below link
http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/sap/oradb11g-article-upd-1-323074.pdf
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/osb-11gr1certmatrix.xls

Oracle 11g advantages for performance

Hello,
I am doing test of Client side result set cache on oracle 11 g rel2 ,O/S- RHEL
i am doing test as below on 2 Oracle 11g rel2 test servers on RHEL
one oracle 11g rel2 instance is used as server1,from other oracle 11g rel2 server2, i am running queries connecting to server1 through sqlplus,listener(tnsnames )
i run query few times without any client cache settings then
i have set init.ora paras for oracle 11g rel2 for client result cache,cache size/cache lag
i run the same query few times
in both the cases after each run i am noting statistics
select * from V$RESULT_CACHE_OBJECTS;
select * from V$CLIENT_RESULT_CACHE_STATS;
select * from gv$cpool_conn_info;
also autotrace,plan etc
but after using cache this views are getting poplulated ,autiotrace plan shows cache is used
but i cant see any improvement in performance after using client cache like speed,reduce network trip, etc
in fact without using cache/with no hint ,query executes faster
let me know if i am missing something,i believe sqlplus internally using OCI
thanks

>
I tested with custom code using java/jdbc thin driver ,connecting same as between 2 oracle 11g2 instance 1 as client other server,running code calling queries from client connecting to server
>
Unless you plan to provide the information ask for about what it is you are doing there really isn't any point in providing status updates that: you test this, you tested that. You made several statements about what you were doing
>
i have set init.ora paras for oracle 11g rel2 for client result cache,cache size/cache lag
i run the same query few times
in both the cases after each run i am noting statistics
select * from V$RESULT_CACHE_OBJECTS;
select * from V$CLIENT_RESULT_CACHE_STATS;
select * from gv$cpool_conn_info;
also autotrace,plan etc
>
and were asked to provide specific information that you haven't provided nor have you provided the query.
>
You say you are doing a bunch of things
But you don't post any of those results so we can see what it is you are looking at.
No one can comment on things they can't see.
>
You have to be using OCI for client side caching so if you use the Java thin driver but don't use OCI there won't be any cacheing. There also won't be any if it is not enabled or if the query has certain constraints as listed in the doc
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28395/oci10new.htm#CHDGGFEF
>
Queries that are not Cached
There are queries that are not cached on the OCI client even if the result cache hint is specified. Such queries may be cached on the database if the server result cache feature is enabled (see Oracle Database Concepts, "SQL Query Result Cache" for more information). If a SQL query includes any of the following, then the result set of that query is not cached in the OCI client result cache:
•Views
•Remote objects
•Complex types in the select list
•Snapshot-based or flashback queries
•Queries executed in a serializable, read-only transaction, or inside a flashback session
•Queries that have PL/SQL functions in them
•Queries that have VPD policies enabled on the tables
>
This Oracle-Developer.net article author doesn't seem to have any trouble caching results.
http://www.oracle-developer.net/display.php?id=503

Which one is best option RAC 10g or oracle 11g RAC for certifiction point ?

hi ,
which one is best option RAC 10g or oracle 11g RAC for certifiction point of view?
can any one detail difference between above 2 options?
Regards,
A.Anwar

A. Anwar wrote:
hi ,
which one is best option RAC 10g or oracle 11g RAC for certifiction point of view?
can any one detail difference between above 2 options?The main difference is: Oracle Lifetime Support
Premier Support Ends
Oracle 10g R2 - Jul 2010
Oracle 11g R2 - Jan 2015
Extended Support Ends
Oracle 10g R2 - Jul 2013
Oracle 11g R2 - Jan 2018
http://www.oracle.com/us/support/library/lifetime-support-technology-069183.pdf
Oracle 10g R2 is getting unsupported.

Oracle 11G database for 64 bit windows installation error

Hi,
I downloaded the 11G 64bit for windows and unzipped the files into one folder and ran the setup.exe as an administrator. It opened up the java screen and I chose, create and configure a database. Next screen I chose, Desktop Class, when I click next it dies. It does not show me teh next screen. I went to the appdata folder and saw this error but not sure what to do EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005). Please help. Thanks for your time and help.

Adipur wrote:
Hello, have you tried to create new administrator user, and install using that newly created user...?You found this to be a band-aid solution in your specific instance. (Strange case of installation on windows 7 - unable to complete installation But you have drawn the wrong conclusions and never found the real issue in the cited thread. Under the circumstances, I would not be offering this up as a generalized solution, as you are doing in this thread and in others:
Re: Oracle 11G database for 64 bit windows installation error
Re: Trouble installing Oracle Personal in Windows 7 64-bit environment
I have been doing Oracle DBA work since v 7.3, and have never seen advice like this to be anything more than a work-around the real issue.
Edited by: EdStevens on May 15, 2013 7:03 AM

Oracle performance, slow for larger and more complex results.

Hello Oracle forum,
At the moment i have a Oracle database running and i'm specifically interested in the efficiency spatial extension for webmaps and GIS.
I've been testing the database with large shape files (400mb - 1gigabyte) loaded them into the database with shp2sdo->sql*loader.
Using Benchmark factory i've test the speed of transactions an these drop relatively quickly. I've started with a simple query:
SELECT id FROM map WHERE id = 3 when I increase the amount of id's to 3-10000 the performance decreases drastically.
so :
SELECT id FROM map WHERE id >=3 and id <= 10000
The explain plan shows the second query , both query's use the index.
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 9828 | 49140 | 22 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| SYS_C009650 | 9828 | 49140 | 22 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
675 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
134248 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
7599 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
655 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
9796 rows processed
The statistics does not show very weird stuff, but maybe i'm wrong. Nothing changed in the explain plan except for the range scan instead of a unique scan.
The query returns lots of results and this is I think the reason why my measured time of the query is large. The time it takes returning large amount of rows increases quickly for more rows.
. Can this be solved? The table has been analyzed before starting the query.
The parameters of the database are not really changed from standard, I increased the amount of memory used by Oracle 11g to 1+ gigabyte.
and let the database itself decide how it uses this memory.
The system specs are and db_parameters are:
Oracle 11G
Memory Processor # of CPUs OS OS Version OS B
1.99 gb Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz 2 Microsoft WindowsXP 5.2600
0=Oracle decides which value will be given
cursor_sharing EXACT
cursor_space_for_time FALSE
db_block_size 8192
db_recovery_file_dest_size 2147483648
diagnostic_dest C:\DBBENCHMARK\ORACLE
dispatchers (PROTOCOL=TCP) (SERVICE=gistestXDB)
hash_area_size 131072
log_buffer 5656576
memory_max_target 1115684864
memory_target 1048576000
open_cursors 300
parallel_max_servers 20
pga_aggregate_target 0
processes 150
resumable_timeout 2162688
sort_area_size 65536
Sga=632mb
PGA=368mb
javapool=16mb
largepool=8mb
other=8mb
So I indexed and analyzed the data what did i forget? I can speed it up with soft parsing, but the problem remains . Hopefully this enough information for some analysis, does anyone experienced the same problems ? I tested with SQLdeveloper the speed and is shows the same speed as Benchmark factory. What could be wrong with the parameters?
Thanks,
Jan Martijn
Edited by: user12227964 on 25-jan-2010 4:53
Edited by: user12227964 on 26-jan-2010 2:20

Sand wrote:
select count(id) , resulted in 3669015 counted id's.
The database counted 18,345,075 rows per second without binded variables , which is ten times slower as your result. This can be possible because of hardware but my question is specifically about the number of rows returned thus large amount of results. The idea was not to compare the speed of "+select count(*)+" statements - but to illustrate that even when dealing with a huge number of rows, one can decrease the amount of I/O that needs to be performed to deal with that number of rows.
Select id from map where id <= 1
4000 rows per second are selected, Rows/sec is a meaningless measurement - due to physical I/O (PIO) versus logical I/O (LIO). You can select a 100 rows and these require PIO. Resulting in an elapsed time of 1 sec. You can select a 1000 rows that require only LIO. With an an elapsed time of 0.5 sec.
Is the 2nd method better or faster? No. It simply needed less time to be spend on I/O as the data blocks were in the buffer cache (memory) and did not require very slow and expensive disk access.
Another database i testes returns 6 times 25425 rows back per second for the same query (100 ids). What could be a parameter that limits the output speed of multiple rows in a query?.Every single row that needs to be read/processed by a SQL statement has a cost associated with it. This cost is not consistent! It differs depending on how that row can reached - what I/O paths are available to find that rows? Does the full table need to be scanned? Does an index need to be scanned? Is there a unique index that can be used? Is the table partitioned and can partitioning pruning be applied and local partition indexes used? Are there are user functions that need to be applied to the row's data? Etc. Etc.
All these together determine how fast the client gets a row from the cursor executing that SQL.
The more rows you want to process, the bigger the increase in the cost/expense - specifically more I/O. As I/O is the biggest expense (slowest ito elapsed time).
So you want to do as little I/O as possible and read as little data as possible. For example, instead of a full table scan, a fast full index scan. For example, instead of reading the complete contents of a 10GB table, reading the complete contents of a 12MB index for that table.
I suggest that you read the Oracle Performance Guide to familiarise yourself with basic performance concepts. Use http://tahiti.oracle.com for finding the the guide for your applicable Oracle version.

Is it possible to install oracle 11g client 32 bit and oracle 11g client 64

Hi,
I have Windows 2008 R2 64 Bit Operating Server Installed.
Other software that are Installed :
1) Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate 32 Bit.
2) Microsoft SharePoint server 2010 64 Bit.
For my development purpose I want to install both oracle 11g client 32 bit and oracle 11g client 64 on the same machine.
Is it possible to install both 32 and 64 bit instance on the same machine.
Thanks
Sambit

959211 wrote:
Hi,
I have Windows 2008 R2 64 Bit Operating Server Installed.
Other software that are Installed :
1) Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate 32 Bit.
2) Microsoft SharePoint server 2010 64 Bit.
For my development purpose I want to install both oracle 11g client 32 bit and oracle 11g client 64 on the same machine.
Is it possible to install both 32 and 64 bit instance on the same machine.
Thanks
Sambityes, possible; but minor challenge to manage dynamically
how to ensure that you actually use the flavor you desire?

Oracle adf supported for json applications

Hi can u any one help to me
Oracle adf supported for json

Hi,
create a Jersey client and generate a JavaBean data control. This is how you get JSON clients integrated assuming the JSON client is a REST service.
Frank

Is Weblogic 11g supports for Kerberos AES/RC4 Encryption on Windows 2008 R2

Is Weblogic 11g supports for Kerberos AES/RC4 Encryption on Windows 2008 R2?
Thanks,

DES is disabled by default on 2008, could this DC be a Windows 2003? If so then this would be the expected encyption.
The following is the list of the encryption available for each Windows system
Windows 2000, XP,Windows Server 2003:
DES, RC4
         Vista
, Windows Server 2008:      DES, RC4,AES
         Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2:     DES(disabled by default), RC4,AES
From:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/openspecification/archive/2010/11/17/encryption-type-selection-in-kerberos-exchanges.aspx
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCITP: Enterprise Administrator
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security, BS CSci
2012, 2008, Vista, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
Twitter @pbbergs http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/paulbergson
Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup.
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

When did Oracle drop support for this?

Hi
I have the 9.2.0.2 Windows installation of Oracle on a test PC here. On 9.2.0.2, the CREATE TABLESPACE statement fails when specifying the TEMPORARY clause. Instead I have to use CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE. The difference of course is that the latter creates a locally managed temp ts while the former creates dictionary managed temp ts.
Does anyone know the exact version at which Oracle stopped support for CREATE TABLESPACE ... TEMPORARY - i.e. dictionary managed temporary tablespaces?
Thanks
Martin

Fredrik is correct. My system tablespace is locally managed. I tried his proposed tablespace creation and it did fail "ORA-12913: Cannot create dictionary managed tablespace". So there is the answer.
Thanks to both of you for the help.
Martin.

No Oracle SSO support for POSTing data to protected resource [yet]

Hi,
I am using OHS infront of JBOSS and redirecting all requests from OHS to JBOSS after SSO Authentication.
Everything works fine except that I get 500 error when I try to post data from HTML form.
When i click on a button on a JSP page that submits page with the Form Post, the request goes to the OHS and is not getting forwarded.
OHS log shows the following
127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2007:08:57:23 -0400] "POST /Sample/protected/standard.do HTTP/1.1" 500 788
Proxy_error.log shows the followin error
[Tue Sep 11 08:57:23 2007] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] [ecid: 1189515443:10.6.2.137:268:5568:74,0] \n[OSSO] E09: No Oracle SSO support for POSTing data to protected resource [yet].\n
Any idea?
Thanks
Srikar.

This error does no occur in our dev or test environments, only production. A workaround for us was to disable SSO by commenting the line to load it in the file $ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/conf/httpd.conf. The line to comment out looks like: include "/u01/app/oracle/product/mid/Apache/Apache/conf/mod_osso.conf" where the /u01/app... above is the expansion of $ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/conf/mod_osso.conf.
We do not use SSO for our application, so this is not a problem. I next plan to try to figure out why this behaves like this, so I can keep all the server configurations consistent.
HTH,
Mark

Oracle 11g Support For WLS 10 and WLS 9.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for