Oracle 9i and windows 2003 R2 installation issues

Hi All,
I have a windows 2003 R2 server with oracle 9.2.0.8 installed both OS and DB are 32bit. The server has 12gb ram and I therefore use AWE and /PAE, however when ever the number of connections exceeds >60 memory errors start to appear and sessions crash. Has anyone out there carried out a successful install of 9i and windows 2003 R2. Can anyone help with the resolution of these issues.
regards
Alan

some more information
I’ve just restarted the server with its full quota of 16GB of RAM and selected both boot.ini switches (/PAE and /3GB) at server startup. I then amended the dbblock_lru_latches parameter from 128 to 64. Before I even started the database I tried running ‘ipconfig /all’ at the command prompt with the following result:
D:\Oracle>ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
An internal error occurred: Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service.
Please contact Microsoft Product Support Services for further help.
is it windows causing these issues?
rgds
alan

Similar Messages

Oracle Discoverer and Windows 2003 Server

Did anyone know if Discoverer 4.1 is compatible on windows 2003 server?
Also if Discoverer 10g is also compatible on windows 2003 server?
Thanks.

Hi,
No, Discoverer 4i is not supported with Windows 2003, see Note 332433.1. 10g is compatible with Windows 2003.
Rod West

HP LaserjetPro M277dw printer and windows vista driver installation issues

I ust got the hot off the press HP Color LaserJet Pro MFP M277 which seems to be a miraculous machine. Just one problem. When trying to download and install the printer driver it goes through the whole process and then tells you the driver will not work with this operating system.
Hmmm. It says on the HP website that this is the correct software for this machine. I have been through at least 10 HP support people up to Level 3 support and hours of online work with HP people trying to install the software. The word I get back is that it will not work with my machine. So I am wondering if I have a Windows Vista 64 bit machine, and the software says it is for that machine, but it wont load, what machine will it work with? The last person I worked with just told me I will need to get a new computer. I thought I just bought a printer that would work with my computer, and now I am told i have to buy a new one?
Any ideas on how to get the software to load? I have some functionality, such as wireless network printing that one technician was able to get to work, but no scanning. Another technician changed all the permissions for installing various programming segments to "everyone" but that didnt work either. He had it so messed up that the it would not print anymore wirelessly either. I had to restore to an earlier date after that guy got off my computer so i could at least get some functionality back.
So, without the driver, I cannot scan to this computer, and i really dont know what other good things i am missing out on because I have never experienced the correct configuration......please help if you can. I need to send the machine back within a certain time period, and I really do think it is the solution for my business, if I could get it to work......Thanks!
PS Direct connection to computer and downloading software that way does't work either.....cannot use the printer directly connected.....

Hi,
Is it the following one ? If not, please download then try again:
http://ftp.hp.com/pub/softlib/software13/COL60646/kj-145845-1/HP_LaserJet_M277_PCL6_Legacy_Print_Dri...
By the way, what is the model of your Lasejet M277 printer ? Must be M277 something.
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

External table in Oracle 10g and Windows server 2003 problem

I'm having a problem accessing an external table in an Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 server environment. The disk is remote (mapped) to the server. It's the usual access errors, kup-04001 or kup-04063.
I have the [seemingly] exact same setup in an Oracle 9i and Windows 2000 server environment which works perfectly. Services run as local SYSTEM and SYSTEM has full permissions on the disk. Directories exist and so do the permissions to the directories.
In the Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 environment, services run as local SYSTEM and SYSTEM has full permissions on the mapped disk. Directories exist and so do the permissions to the directories.
This obviously effects mappings, deployments, etc.
Does anyone know if something changed in either the db or the os?
Thank you,
Michael

Thank you for your reply.
Your proposal is the standard solution. As a matter of fact, that's how it is on my "old" system. Server "A" Oracle services are started by SYSTEM. Server "B" Oracle services are started by SYSTEM and is where the flat files reside. SYSTEM has full permissions on a disk local to Server "B". Database directoriies defined on Server "A" point to Server "B" remote disk. External Tables on Server "A" are defined with directories that point to Server "B" remote (mapped) disk. I have no problems with this configuration.
I'm having a problem acheiving the same configuration with Oracle 10g and Windows 2003. I guess I'm baffled over the fact it isn't working the same way as my "old" environment. Why shouldn't it? Oracle (and you) want me to start services as a specific user. It shouldn't have to be that way unless something changed in the way the database makes calls to the os or if Microsoft slipped something in with one of it's numerous security patches.

External table in Oracle 10g and Windows server 2003

I'm having a problem accessing an external table in an Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 server environment. The disk is remote (mapped) to the server. It's the usual access errors, kup-04001 or kup-04063.
I have the [seemingly] exact same setup in an Oracle 9i and Windows 2000 server environment which works perfectly. Services run as local SYSTEM and SYSTEM has full permissions on the disk. Directories exist and so do the permissions to the directories.
In the Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 environment, services run as local SYSTEM and SYSTEM has full permissions on the mapped disk. Directories exist and so do the permissions to the directories.
Does anyone know if something changed in either the db or the os?
Thank you,
Michael

Version 9.2.04.
Server "A" Oracle services are started by SYSTEM. Server "B" Oracle services are started by SYSTEM and is where the flat files reside. SYSTEM has full permissions on a disk local to Server "B". Database directoriies defined on Server "A" point to Server "B" remote disk. External Tables on Server "A" are defined with directories that point to Server "B" remote (mapped) disk. I have no problems with this configuration.
I'm having a problem acheiving the same configuration with Oracle 10g and Windows 2003. I guess I'm baffled over the fact it isn't working the same way as my "old" environment. Why shouldn't it? Oracle (and you) want me to start services as a specific user. It shouldn't have to be that way unless something changed in the way the database makes calls to the os or if Microsoft slipped something in with one of it's numerous security patches.

Any known issues with Flash player 9 and windows 2003 compatibility?

Hi guys..
Is there any known compatibility problem with running flash
applications
on Windows 2003 Server?
My application runs just so well with Windows XP
yet it throws a 2015 bitmap error
when it is being run on the windows 2003 server.
(Not quite often but often enough. the only difference is the
operating
system)
Is there any known issue about this?
Or could there be any compatibility problem with flash player
and
windows 2003?
Any hints would be deeply appreciated...
Thank you...

Hyperion 32-bit Web Apps are fully compatible with Essbase 64-bit. Same with 32-bit Essbase client.

Oracle 10g on Windows 2003: instance not autostarting

I'm installing Oracle 10g (10.2.0.1) on two new Windows 2003 servers, and I'm facing the same problem, even after some full re-installations, on both of them; so this issue seems to be some kind of bug related to Oracle 10g on Windows 2003 and not just some random error.
When I run the installation it completes fine, and the database instance gets created and started without any trouble; I can connect to it using the console, the Java stand-alone Enterprise Manager, SQL Plus or anything else; it works when connecting from clients, too.
As soon as the server is rebooted, Oracle services start but it just seems the instance isn't actually started: any connection is refused by the listener which complains about not knowing the supplied instance name, and the oracle.exe process only uses about 11 MB of memory, which is a sure sign it isn't doing anything useful. The instance is configured to start, the registry keys are properly set, and everything works correclty after the installation... but stops working after the first server reboot.
I tried manually stopping and starting the services, in various orders; I tried re-installing Oracle various times; I tried deleting and re-creating the database instance, both at setup time or manually after the setup was done without creating an instance, I tried anything I could think of.
The only thing I didn't try was applying patch set 10.2.0.3 to the installation, but I just can't seem to find them, even though my company has an Oracle partnership; I find Metalink just a bit too confusing.
Can someone please help?
P.S.
The servers are actually VMWare ESX virtual servers, but I just can't imagine this to be the cause of the problem. The operating system on both servers is Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition (not R2), italian language, with service pack 2 and all the latest updates from Windows Update. The servers are not domain members and I'm running the installation using the local Administrator account.

I don't have a physical server available now, but I really can't even imagine how the underlying hardware, be it physical or virtual, could affect this behaviour. I'm talking about the Oracle service starting while the instance isn't, this is very unlikely to have any relationship with device drivers.

IDES 46E with windows 2003 server Installation errors..

Hi,
Can some body help me in IDES 46E with windows 2003 server Installation?.I'm tired of installing with this combination on my desktop my env as follows.
1.Windows 2003 Server
2.JDK.142
3.Oracle 9.0.2 with 7 patch
4.IDES 46E
Installed successfully Database and SAP but while exporting data in to tables then getting errors.
Thanks in advance..
Sreedhar

Hi GreetZ,
I opened the respective 3200,3300,and 3600 ports and I can access my router from outside home.I can also ping <IPAddress> and telnet<IPAddress> successfully.But I'm unable to telnet <IPAddress><space>3600 giving error..connection failed on port 3600 and same error for remaining ports too.Pls help me in fix this issue.
Thanks for your replies..
Sreedhar

Oracle 10g on Windows 2003: Can't start with any account but Local System

Fresh install of Oracle 10g on Windows 2003. I install as a member of the local admin group and everything works great. The various services are starting as Local System, though, and I'd prefer to set them up to start as a specific domain user account.
When I make that change, however, I can't get any of the Oracle related services to start. I've added this domain user to the local ora_dba group on my server, given it the ability to log on as a batch job and log on as a service in the local security policy. Doesn't seem to help.
I saw a thread that implied using a domain user account wasn't supported (didn't seem right to me, but what the hell), so I created a local user account and tried that. Same result.
Something I'm missing?
Thanks.

What is missing, I suspect, is reading the installation docs.
http://docs.oracle.com
If that doesn't work then come back and ask specific requestions referencing the appropriate document and naming the actual version you are trying to install (ps 10g is a marketing name not a version number).

Oracle 9i rac windows 2003 server

Hai,
I am planning to do oracle 9i rac windows 2003 server(enterprise edition service pack 2) installion. All the pre-requiste has been completed. At the time of running clustersetup.exe , it is exiting without showing an error. The event veiwer is having the below mentioned details.
Event Type:     Information
Event Source:     DrWatson
Event Category:     None
Event ID:     4097
Date:          4/8/2011
Time:          3:05:13 PM
User:          N/A
Computer:     IBDB1
Description:
The application, C:\preinstall_rac\clustersetup\clustersetup.exe, generated an application error The error occurred on 04/08/2011 @ 15:05:13.921 The exception generated was c0000005 at address 004014C1 (clustersetup)
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Any idea how to resolve this issue?
Regards
Sridhar

Windows 2003 is not listed as supported platform:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/A95493_01/reqs.htm#1101810
I would not try to install a desupported database version on an unsupported platform.

Install Oracle VM on WIndows 2003 Sevser/XP/Vista

Has any one successfully installed Oracle VM on WIndows 2003 Server or XP or Vista?
Is it possible to migrate an exisitng Oracle Express Edition database to Oracle VM? Or the Oracle Express Edition has to be installed on Oracle VM on one platform before it is portable to another machine/server.
Is there any viewlet on how to use Oracle VM?

To answer your first question: Oracle VM Server can NOT be installed on Windows.
From the OVM-FAQ:
Does Oracle VM require a host operating system?
No. Oracle VM installs directly on server hardware and does not require a host operating system.
This applies to the VM Server. For the VM Manager:
The Oracle VM Manager works on the operating system Oracle Enterprise Linux 4 Update 5 or later.
FYI - these servers are all Linux-based.
You might check the documentation in the "Virtualization Technology Center": http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/virtualization/index.html to find some more answers.
Message was edited by:
hbokho

Oracle 10g in windows 2003

I am trying to install oracle 10g to windows 2003, but during the installation a message appears something like that "didnÂ´t find the IP ...."
after that the intallation continue and some components donÂ´t install
finally the installation is completed but i can start session in the data base scott
Please help

You can use any of the samples in the official Oracle docs:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14229/pt_demos.htm#sthref1277
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14228/ptrep_demos.htm#BEIDDCBI
There is simply nothing special that has to be done for the different OS.

Oracle 8 in windows 2003

Hai All,
Oracle 8 support windows 2003 ? any patches needed?
please help..
Shiju

Oracle 8 hit the market when Windows 2003 didn't event exist.
Consequently Oracle 8 is not certified on Windows 2003 (so is not guaranteed to work) and as it is both not certified and desupported Oracle won't help you out.
Consequently you are on your own, when you continue your road to hell.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Cant install oracle 8i in windows 2003 server

hi,
I am a newbie in Oracle.While Im trying to install Oracle 8i in Windows 2003 server , setup is not running.It didn't show anything.When trying to run from auto run, after splash screen nothing came.I formatted hard disk,changed two more hard disks,.changed machine...but cant install it in no way... It is the same case in Windows XP home edition.
But it is running in one of my friend's machine(windows 2003 server)
Please help me with valuable solutions.
Thanks in advance

Did your friend install on W2003 or upgrade from an older version of the OS?
When trying to run programs on an OS that is not certified for the programs, it is hit-n-miss whether the OS actually has the support files needed for the programs.
Think about this: the Oracle environment needs OS support in the form of DLLs and other files. The contents of the DLLs are made visible as APIs. Each time Microsoft releases patches, it is possible that the APIs that Oracle used are changed. This is extremely true when a new version of the OS is released, and even more true with stripped versions such as XP Home.
If your friend installed and then applied patches, [s]he may have hit the proper API combination. If you appled patches first, you may have skootched your APIs to the point that Oracle can not longer install.
Even if you happen to get it installed, you run the risk of getting clobbered any time you install a new Microsoft patch. The risk is minimized when you use a certified combination of the OS and application.

Oracle 10g On Windows 2003

Hello All,
I have limited knowledge/experience with ORACLE and like your comments/feedback on following:
We plan to install Oracle 10g on Windows 2003.
Question:
1) Oracle 10G Standard Edition limitation on Memory/CPU
2) To setup a Stand-by database server do we need Oracle Enterprise Edition?
3) We plan to have 8.0 GB memory on Windows 2003 server, is the Oracle SE capable of using up to 8.0 GB of memory
4) Last but not least any idea/suggestion on best practices for Oracle 10g on Windows 2003
I know some of the questions are not clear but hope to get some answers.
Much Appreciated!
Kamal Hassan

3) We plan to have 8.0 GB memory on Windows 2003
server, is the Oracle SE capable of using up to 8.0 GB of memoryTo start with, does your combination of hardware and operating system provide the ability for Oracle to use the amount of memory? (you need to know what hardware architecture and edition of Windows)
About the Std Edition being capable or no, in matter of license terms... I believe there is no direct memory limitation. However the license constrains the server hardware maximum capacity (number of "processors"), which perhaps could limit the size of RAM indirectly.
I forgot to mention, that, depending on your choice of platform/os and of course your apps, you may need to consider whether to run 32 or 64-bit Oracle.
Is the plan to run one big or many small (memory-wise) Oracle instances?
Message was edited by:
orafad

Oracle 9i and windows 2003 R2 installation issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for