Oracle function and query return different results

Hi, I am using oracle 10g database.
Function is :
create or replace FUNCTION FUNC_FAAL(myCode number,firstDate date
*, secondDate date)*
RETURN INTEGER as
rtr integer;
BEGIN
select count() into rtr*
from myschema.my_table tbl where tbl.myDateColumn between firstDate and
secondDate and tbl.kkct is null and tbl.myNumberColumn = myCode ;
return (rtr);
END FUNC_FAAL;
This function returns 117177 as result.
But if I run same query in the function seperately ;
select count()*
from myschema.my_table tbl
where tbl.myDateColumn between firstDate and secondDate
and tbl.kkct is null and tbl.myNumberColumn = myCode ;
I get different result 11344 (which is the right one).
Table and function are in the same schema.
What can be the problem ?
Thanks.

1. i think ur parameter name and Column names are same Firstdate and seconddate try to choose different name
2. try using Trunc function around your dates
where trunc(tbl.myDateColumn) between trunc(firstDate) and trunc(secondDate)then compare the result....sometimes time elements comes into play.
Baig
[My Oracle Blog|http://baigsorcl.blogspot.com/]

Similar Messages

Same Query returning different result (Different execution plan)

Hi all,
To day i have discovered a strange thing: a query that return a different result when using a different execution plan.
The query :
SELECT *
FROM schema.table@database a
WHERE     column1 IN ('3')
       AND column2 = '101'
       AND EXISTS
              (SELECT null
                 FROM schema.table2 c
                WHERE a.column3 = SUBSTR (c.column1, 2, 12));where schema.table@database is a remote table.
when executed with the hint /*+ ordered use_nl(a c) */ these query return no result and its execution plan is :
Rows     Row Source Operation
      0 NESTED LOOPS (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=4894659 us)
   4323   SORT UNIQUE (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=50835 us)
   4336    TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2 (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=7607 us)
      0   REMOTE (cr=0 r=0 w=0 time=130536 us)When i changed the execution plan with the hint /*+ use_hash(c a) */
Rows     Row Source Operation
   3702 HASH JOIN SEMI (cr=35 r=0 w=0 time=497839 us)
22556   REMOTE (cr=0 r=0 w=0 time=401176 us)
   4336   TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2 (cr=35 r=0 w=0 time=7709 us)It seem that when the execution plan have changed the remote query return no result.
It'is a bug or i have missed somthing ?
PS: The two table are no subject to insert or update statement.
Oracle version : 9.2.0.2.0
System version : HP-UX v1
Thanks.

H.Mahmoud wrote:
Oracle version : 9.2.0.2.0
System version : HP-UX v1Hard to say. You're using a very old and deprecated version of the database, and one that was known to contain bugs.
9.2.0.7 was really the lowest version of 9i that was considered to be 'stable', but even so, it's old and lacking in many ways.
Consider upgrading to the latest database version at your earliest opportunity. (or at least apply patches up to the latest 9i version before querying if there is bugs in your really low buggy version)

Same query returning different result set

hi all,
i am using db 10g.
i have a query like below
SELECT SUM(EID_AMOUNT)amt,EID_INCR_CODE,EIH_EFF_DATE
     FROM EMP_INC_HEADER,EMP_INC_DETAILS
    WHERE EIH_EMP_CODE = EID_EMP_CODE
      AND EIH_EFF_DATE = EIH_EFF_DATE
      AND EIH_STATUS   = 'P'
      AND EID_EMP_CODE = '003848'
GROUP BY EID_INCR_CODE,EIH_EFF_DATE
ORDER BY EID_INCR_CODE,EIH_EFF_DATE;which is leading to the output
      AMT EID_INCR_CODE   EIH_EFF_D
     2000 BASIC           21-SEP-10
     2000 BASIC           23-SEP-10
     2000 BASIC           15-OCT-10
     2000 BASIC           21-OCT-10
     1200 HTRAN           21-SEP-10
     1200 HTRAN           23-SEP-10
     1200 HTRAN           15-OCT-10
     1200 HTRAN           21-OCT-10
      800 OTHERS          21-SEP-10
      800 OTHERS          23-SEP-10
      800 OTHERS          15-OCT-10
      800 OTHERS          21-OCT-10i have query
SELECT SUM(EID_AMOUNT)amt,EID_INCR_CODE,EID_EFF_DATE
FROM EMP_INC_HEADER,EMP_INC_DETAILS
WHERE EIH_EMP_CODE = EID_EMP_CODE
AND EIH_EFF_DATE = EID_EFF_DATE
AND EIH_STATUS = 'P'
AND EID_EMP_CODE = '003848'
GROUP BY EID_INCR_CODE,EID_EFF_DATE
ORDER BY EID_INCR_CODE,EID_EFF_DATE;
leading to
      AMT EID_INCR_CODE   EID_EFF_D
      500 BASIC           21-SEP-10
      500 BASIC           23-SEP-10
      500 BASIC           15-OCT-10
      500 BASIC           21-OCT-10
      300 HTRAN           21-SEP-10
      300 HTRAN           23-SEP-10
      300 HTRAN           15-OCT-10
      300 HTRAN           21-OCT-10
      200 OTHERS          21-SEP-10
      200 OTHERS          23-SEP-10
      200 OTHERS          15-OCT-10
      200 OTHERS          21-OCT-10
12 rows selected.what second query is returning is correct. as per the table.
but my question what is the difference between my first and second query.
in what way it is different(i am not getting any idea).
if any one is having any clue please share with me.
Thanks..

what is the difference between my first and second queryLook like there's no difference.
I think you really meant something like
SELECT SUM(EID_AMOUNT) amt,EID_INCR_CODE,EIH_EFF_DATE
FROM EMP_INC_HEADER EIH,
       EMP_INC_DETAILS EID
WHERE EIH.EMP_CODE = EID.EMP_CODE
   AND EIH.EFF_DATE = EIH.EFF_DATE
   AND EIH.STATUS   = 'P'
   AND EID.EMP_CODE = '003848'
GROUP BY EID.INCR_CODE,EIH.EFF_DATE
ORDER BY EID.INCR_CODE,EIH.EFF_DATERegards
Etbin

Same query giving different results

Hi
I m surprised to see the behaviour of oracle. I have two different sessions for same scheema on same server. In both sessions same query returns different results. The query involves some calculations like sum and divisions on number field.
I have imported this data from another server using export / import utility available with 9i server. Before export every thing was going fine. Is there some problem with this utility.
I m using Developer 6i as the front end for my client server application. The behaviour of my application is very surprizing as once it shows the correct data and if I close the screen and reopen, it shows wrong data.
I m really stucked with the abnormal behaviour. Please tell me the possiblities and corrective action for these conditions.
Regards
Asad.

There is nothing uncommitted in both the sessions. But still different results are returned.
I m sending u the exact query and result returned in both sessions.
Session 1:
SQL> rollback;
Rollback complete.
SQL> SELECT CC.CREDIT_HRS,GP.GRADE_PTS
2 FROM GRADE G, COURSE_CODE CC, GRADE_POLICY GP
3 WHERE G.COURSE_CDE=CC.COURSE_CDE
4 AND G.SELECTION_ID=45 AND G.GRADE_TYP=GP.GRADE_TYP
5 AND G.TERM_PROG_ID=17 AND GP.TERM_ID=14
6 /
CREDIT_HRS GRADE_PTS
3 4
4 3.33
4 3.33
3 4
3 4
3 4
3 4
7 rows selected.
SQL>
SESSION 2:
SQL> rollback;
Rollback complete.
SQL> SELECT CC.CREDIT_HRS,GP.GRADE_PTS
2 FROM GRADE G, COURSE_CODE CC, GRADE_POLICY GP
3 WHERE G.COURSE_CDE=CC.COURSE_CDE
4 AND G.SELECTION_ID=45 AND G.GRADE_TYP=GP.GRADE_TYP
5 AND G.TERM_PROG_ID=17 AND GP.TERM_ID=14
6 /
CREDIT_HRS GRADE_PTS
3 4
4 3.33
3 4
3 4
3 4
3 4
6 rows selected.
SQL>
U can see in session 1, seven rows are returned while in session 2 six rows are returned. I have issued a rollback before query to be sure that data in both sessions is same.

To_char(adate,'dd.mm.yyyy')   returns different results from two oracle clients !!! Is it possible?

Dear all;
We have only one Database server with some IIS's   as web servers on front . Each web server has own oracle client software in order connect to central database..
The same following query used in C# code returns different results on each IIS server.(3 row, or not data found )
why?
select     *    from    aTable    where        to_char( adate , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) =   :search_date
regards
Siya

1006237 wrote:
If adate is of DATE datatype, it will most likely has the time component. Therefore your SQL below is unlikely to return any data.
select * from aTable where adate = to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
Perhaps.....
select * from aTable where TRUNC(adate) = to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
Hi,
not having any sample data from you I could not understand that you wanted to select the range 00:00:00 - 23:59:59 on search_date.
Your method might not be efficient if you have an index on adate.
Maybe something like this will be more efficient
select * from aTable
where adate >= to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
and adate < to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy') + 1;
If you search_date is 30-Aug-2013 it will get records where adate >= 30-Aug-2013 00:00:00 and adate < 31-Aug-2013 00:00:00, so any time of date 30-Aug-2013.
Try like this and let us know if you still have 2 different results.
Regards.
Alberto

Select statement returns different results from 9i and 10g

Hi all,
Would appreciate if someone could help to solve this puzzle here:
I have the exact the statements running on Oracle 9i and 10g, why do they return different results?
Select unique(GroupDesc) , GroupSeq from Module where ModuleId in (Select ModuleId from User_Access where UserId='admin') and Status='A'
In Oracle 9i:
Both columns returned as follows...
GroupDesc | GroupSeq
In Oracle 10g:
Only one column returned, the column with unique keyword was missing...
GroupSeq
Could anyone enlighten me?

yes, the table structure... actually the CREATE TABLE statement...
with some sample data (INSERT INTO)
and the actual queries (both of them - copy-paste them from each separate environment)
you can use tags around the statements this will format it to a fixed font - making it easier to read
Edited by: Alex Nuijten on Feb 20, 2009 10:05 AM

Calling Oracle function and Procedure using OCCI with in C++ code

Could any body send me the sample code to create and execute Oracle function and Procedure using OCCI concept in C++?.
Edited by: 788634 on Aug 16, 2010 4:09 AM

Hi Vishnu,
Yes, sure, you can create a PL/SQL procedure, function, package, package body, etc. from within an OCCI application. I would say that, generally, this is not the sort of activity a typical client application would perform unless there is some initialization/installation processes that need to happen. In any case, here is a simple demo showing how to create a stand alone procedure (in a real application I would use a package and body) that returns a ref cursor. The ref cursor is just a simple select of two columns in the hr.countries sample table. Of course, there is no error handling, object orientation, etc. in this demo - I wanted to keep the code as short and as simple as possible to illustrate the concept.
Regards,
Mark
#include <occi.h>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
using namespace oracle::occi;
int main(void)
// occi variables
Environment *env;
Connection *con;
Statement   *stmt;
ResultSet   *rs;
// database connection information
string user = "hr";
string passwd = "hr";
string db = "orademo";
// sql to create the procedure which returns a ref cursor as out parameter
// should be run as hr sample user or in a schema that has select privilege
// on the hr.countries table and a synonym (countries) that points to the
// hr.countries table
string sqlCreate =
    "create or replace procedure get_countries(p_rc out sys_refcursor) as "
    "begin"
    " open p_rc for"
    " select country_id, country_name from countries order by country_name; "
    "end;";
// pl/sql anonymous block to call the procedure
string sqlCall = "begin get_countries(:1); end;";
// create a default environment for this demo
env = Environment::createEnvironment(Environment::DEFAULT);
cout << endl;
// open the connection to the database
con = env->createConnection(user, passwd, db);
// display database version
cout << con->getServerVersion() << endl << endl;
// create statement object for creating procedure
stmt = con->createStatement(sqlCreate);
// create the procedure
stmt->executeUpdate();
// terminate the statement object
con->terminateStatement(stmt);
// now create new statement object to call procedure
stmt = con->createStatement(sqlCall);
// need to register the ref cursor output parameter
stmt->registerOutParam(1, OCCICURSOR);
// call the procedure through the anonymous block
stmt->executeUpdate();
// get the ref cursor as an occi resultset
rs = stmt->getCursor(1);
// loop through the result set
// and write the values to the console
while (rs->next())
    cout << rs->getString(1) << ": " << rs->getString(2) << endl;
// close the result set after looping
stmt->closeResultSet(rs);
// terminate the statement object
con->terminateStatement(stmt);
// terminate the connection to the database
env->terminateConnection(con);
// terminate the environment
Environment::terminateEnvironment(env);
// use this as a prompt to keep the console window from
// closing when run interactively from the IDE
cout << endl << "ENTER to continue...";
cin.get();
return 0;
}

Returning Different Results Based on Input Criteria

I have a complex nested select statement. Based on selection criteria I want to return different results. Say for instance I had an input parameter Called Products which could contain a Yes/No Flag. If the Flag was Yes then I would want the "top" select, statement to be The following:
Select Product, Time_ID, Amt
From
My Complex Nested Select
But if Product was set to "No", I would want the following:
Select Time_ID, Amt
From
My Complex Nested Select
I know, or course that I can have two COMPLETE set of SQL which are invoked based upon testing the value of the PRODUCT Parameter, but If I duplicate the "inner nested select" then I have 2 sets of select staments to maintain. Is there an alternative to this? Could I make the inner portion which does not change a function of some sort so that my code would look something like this?
Select Product, Time_ID, Amt
From
Execute myNestedSelectFunction
But if Product was set to "No", I would want the following:
Select Time_ID, Amt
From
Execute myNestedSelectFunction
This would atleast ensure that I only have to go one place to maintain the logic of the "static Nested Select" statement.
Just want to make sure I do not have a real viable alternative to "duplicating code"
Thanks

Hi,
Look in TFM for PIPELINED functions which will allow you to:SELECT Product, Time_ID, Amt FROM TABLE(myPipelinedFunctionReturningSelectResult()) T;
SELECT Time_ID, Amt FROM TABLE(myPipelinedFunctionReturningSelectResult()) T;There are samples if you look on AskTom too.
Regards,
Yoann.

"select count(*)" and "select single *" returns different result

Good day!
product version SAP ECC 6.0
oracle10
data transfers from external oracle db into customer tables using direct oracle db link
sometimes I get case with different results from 2 statements
*mytable has 10 rows
*1st statement
data: cnt type I value 0.
select count( * ) into cnt from mytable WHERE myfield_0 = 123 and myfield_1 = '123'.
*cnt returns 10 - correct
*2nd statement
select single * from mytable WHERE myfield_0 = 123 and myfield_1 = '123'.
*sy-dbcnt returns 0
*sy-subrc returns 4 - incorrect, 10 rows are "invisible"
but
1. se16 shows correct row number
2. I update just one row from "invisible" rows using se16 and 2nd statement returns correct result after that
can not understand why
thank you in advance.

Thank you, Vishal
but,
general problem is that
1. both statements have the same WHERE conditions
2. 1st return resultset with data (sy-dbcnt=10), 2nd return empty dataset, but must return 1 in sy-dbcnt
Yes, different meaning, you are right, but must 2nd must return 1, because of "select single *" construction, not 0.
Dataset to process is the same, WHERE conditions are equal...
I think the problem is that how ABAP interperets select count(*) and "select single *".
Maybe "select count (*)" scans only PK from index page(s)? and "select single *" scans data pages? and something is wrong with that?
I'm new in SAP and didn't find any SAP tool to trace dump of data and indexes pages with Native SQL.
se16 shows all records.
And why after simple manual update of just one record using se16 "select single *" returns 1?
I've just marked one row to update, didn't change any data, then pressed "save".

SQ02 Infoset returns different results in SQ01 Query vs. Segment Builder TG

I want to get Segment Builder to use the same InfoSet and return the same results so, that I can then make a Target Group...but, I'm sure I'm missing some step along the way.
My SQ01 query returns 79 contact persons, but my segment builder only finds 42, none of which appear to actually be the Contact Person, but are in fact the Business Partner the Contact Person has a Relationship to.
I started by copying the CRM_MKTTG_BP_ADDR InfoSet and added the BUT051 table to it, which is when the SQ01 began returning the needed results.
I suspect the problem may be in the Master Group where I am using the B2B/B2C Program, but I don't know if that's the answer or not. I am not declaring an FM as I am using the BP-GUID in the data source, so I don't 'think' that's the issue...
Here's what I'm currently trying as my Data Source settings in case that will help:
Origin Type              03 InfoSet
RFC dest.
Name of InfoSet          ZCRM_MKTTG_BP_ADDR
Business Partner         BUT000-PARTNER_GUID
Function Module
Sampling InfoSet         ZCRM_MKTTG_BP_ADDR_SMP
Sample                   BUT000-PARTNER_GUID
Object
Partner Function
Description              Z BP Address
I already read every Segment Builder forum thread and the Sap Library on the subject, but either I missed something or there is a step not listed.
Anyone have any suggestions?

Solved!!
I was wrongly using AND/OR options to add filters in the segmentation tool...ups!

JAVA Calling Oracle Function and Returning OBJECT

HI,
I am working as a developer in java/j2ee project.
I am facing one issue:
I need to call Oracle function from java code. Oracle User define function is residing in oracle package and returning Object which contains data.
Can you please help me
With Best Regards

golduniya wrote:
I need to call Oracle function from java code. Oracle User define function is residing in oracle package and returning Object which contains data.
Can you please help meIt requires a great deal of Oracle jdbc driver specific code.
[http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/java.920/a96654/oraint.htm#1012664]

SQL Query produces different results when inserting into a table

I have an SQL query which produces different results when run as a simple query to when it is run as an INSERT INTO table SELECT ...
The query is:
SELECT   mhldr.account_number
,        NVL(MAX(DECODE(ap.party_sysid, mhldr.party_sysid,ap.empcat_code,NULL)),'UNKNWN') main_borrower_status
,        COUNT(1) num_apps
FROM     app_parties ap
SELECT   accsta.account_number
,        actply.party_sysid
,        RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY actply.table_sysid, actply.loanac_latype_code ORDER BY start_date, SYSID) ranking
FROM     activity_players actply
,        account_status accsta
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      actply.table_id (+) = 'ACCGRP'
AND      actply.acttyp_code (+) = 'MHLDRM'
AND      NVL(actply.loanac_latype_code (+),TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))
AND      actply.table_sysid (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,1,8))
) mhldr
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      ap.lenapp_account_number (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(mhldr.account_number,1,8))
GROUP BY mhldr.account_number;      The INSERT INTO code:
TRUNCATE TABLE applicant_summary;
INSERT /*+ APPEND */
INTO     applicant_summary
( account_number
, main_borrower_status
, num_apps
SELECT   mhldr.account_number
,        NVL(MAX(DECODE(ap.party_sysid, mhldr.party_sysid,ap.empcat_code,NULL)),'UNKNWN') main_borrower_status
,        COUNT(1) num_apps
FROM     app_parties ap
SELECT   accsta.account_number
,        actply.party_sysid
,        RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY actply.table_sysid, actply.loanac_latype_code ORDER BY start_date, SYSID) ranking
FROM     activity_players actply
,        account_status accsta
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      actply.table_id (+) = 'ACCGRP'
AND      actply.acttyp_code (+) = 'MHLDRM'
AND      NVL(actply.loanac_latype_code (+),TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))
AND      actply.table_sysid (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,1,8))
) mhldr
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      ap.lenapp_account_number (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(mhldr.account_number,1,8))
GROUP BY mhldr.account_number;      When run as a query, this code consistently returns 2 for the num_apps field (for a certain group of accounts), but when run as an INSERT INTO command, the num_apps field is logged as 1. I have secured the tables used within the query to ensure that nothing is changing the data in the underlying tables.
If I run the query as a cursor for loop with an insert into the applicant_summary table within the loop, I get the same results in the table as I get when I run as a stand alone query.
I would appreciate any suggestions for what could be causing this odd behaviour.
Cheers,
Steve
Oracle database details:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.2.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
Edited by: stevensutcliffe on Oct 10, 2008 5:26 AM
Edited by: stevensutcliffe on Oct 10, 2008 5:27 AM

stevensutcliffe wrote:
Yes, using COUNT(*) gives the same result as COUNT(1).
I have found another example of this kind of behaviour:
Running the following INSERT statements produce different values for the total_amount_invested and num_records fields. It appears that adding the additional aggregation (MAX(amount_invested)) is causing problems with the other aggregated values.
Again, I have ensured that the source data and destination tables are not being accessed / changed by any other processes or users. Is this potentially a bug in Oracle?Just as a side note, these are not INSERT statements but CTAS statements.
The only non-bug explanation for this behaviour would be a potential query rewrite happening only under particular circumstances (but not always) in the lower integrity modes "trusted" or "stale_tolerated". So if you're not aware of any corresponding materialized views, your QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY parameter is set to the default of "enforced" and your explain plan doesn't show any "MAT_VIEW REWRITE ACCESS" lines, I would consider this as a bug.
Since you're running on 10.2.0.2 it's not unlikely that you hit one of the various "wrong result" bugs that exist(ed) in Oracle. I'm aware of a particular one I've hit in 10.2.0.2 when performing a parallel NESTED LOOP ANTI operation which returned wrong results, but only in parallel execution. Serial execution was showing the correct results.
If you're performing parallel ddl/dml/query operations, try to do the same in serial execution to check if it is related to the parallel feature.
You could also test if omitting the "APPEND" hint changes anything but still these are just workarounds for a buggy behaviour.
I suggest to consider installing the latest patch set 10.2.0.4 but this requires thorough testing because there were (more or less) subtle changes/bugs introduced with [10.2.0.3|http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2008/02/nasty-bug-introduced-with-patch-set.html] and [10.2.0.4|http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2008/04/overview-of-new-and-changed-features-in.html].
You could also open a SR with Oracle and clarify if there is already a one-off patch available for your 10.2.0.2 platform release. If not it's quite unlikely that you are going to get a backport for 10.2.0.2.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Dba_index_name and dba_ind_columns showing different results

Hi All,
I am confused why it is showing different results:
[email protected]#>select index_name from dba_indexes where table_name='CRBTPROV_FINAL';
INDEX_NAME
CRBTPROV_INDX1
[email protected]#>select index_name from dba_IND_COLUMNS where table_name='CRBTPROV_FINAL';
INDEX_NAME
CRBTPROV_INDX1
MSISDN_IDX
When trying to drop index MSISDN_IDX it gives error:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
But when trying to check where all the index is used using v$access:
select * from v$access where object='MSISDN_IDX';
no rows selected
Regards,
Kirti

If I run the following query on a 9.2.0.6 database, no index is listed:
select type, count(*) from v$access group by type;CURSOR
FUNCTION
NON-EXISTENT
PACKAGE
SEQUENCE
SYNONYM
TABLE
TRIGGER
VIEW
It seems that index is not taken into account by v$access ?

Union_all query returns wrong results

I have 6 individual queries that combine together using "union_all". If I run it, it returns 6084 records, see example 1.
Example 1:
sql1
union_all
sql2
unionl_all
sql3
sql6;
if I do it this way, example2, I get only 3821 records. Is there a bug in Oracle 11g? I select everything from 6084 records, I should get them all, correct?
Example 2:
select * from
sql1
union_all
sql2
unionl_all
sql3
sql6
note that I use "union_all" because the computer does not take it without the underscore.

user557594 wrote:
Your queries do not deal with thousand of rows. My queries worked ok before the upgrade to 11g. I just want to know if there is a bug related to union all in 11g.If you believe that you are encountering a bug, you really should be posting this over on Metalink (My Oracle Support). When you do, you'll want to specify at a minimum the 4 digit Oracle version you are using (11g could mean either of two major releases and a few different patchsets).
I'm sure if you search My Oracle Support, you'll find at least one bug in whatever version of 11g you're using that occurs when UNION ALL is used (though I'll wager that you need two or three other conditions to be true as well). If you open a ticket, however, Oracle Support can determine whether you are actually encountering an error and/or whether you've encountered any of the published bugs, an unpublished bug, or a new bug. Once you know that, Oracle Support may or may not have a patch for you.
Unfortunately, if you can't post a test case that would allow us to reproduce the problem locally, it's going to be hard for us to provide much assistance. Of course, Oracle Support will also need a reproducible test case, but they can probably help you work through the process of putting one together complete with sample data and a query plan.
Justin

Calling Oracle Functions and Procedures in Java

I've looked online for a blurb on using Oracle SQL functions and
procedures in Java, but I haven't found anything. Can someone
either give me a quick crash course on this, or point me to the
best source of information for this?

From the SQLJ FAQ.
http://otn.oracle.com/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/htdocs/faq.html#sqljplsql
Within your SQLJ statements, you can use PL/SQL anonymous blocks
and call PL/SQL stored procedures and stored functions, as in the
following examples: Anonymous
block:
#sql {
DECLARE
n NUMBER;
BEGIN
n := 1;
WHILE n <= 100 LOOP
INSERT INTO emp (empno) VALUES(2000 +
n);
n := n + 1;
END LOOP;
END
Stored procedure call (returns the maximum
deadline as an output parameter into an output host expression):
#sql { CALL MAX_DEADLINE(:out maxDeadline) };
Stored function call (returns the maximum
deadline as a function return into a result expression):
#sql maxDeadline = { VALUES(GET_MAX_DEADLINE)
Of course, you can also use JDBC code to achieve the same - the
standard JDBC escape sequences for stored function and procedure
calls are supported, using for example:
"{? = CALL GET_MAX_DEADLINE}"
or:
"{call MAX_DEADLINE(?)}"
and for the rest of the details, get that JDBC crash course...

Oracle function and query return different results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for