Oracle trace file
Hi What is the diffrence between following 2 statements
1...SQL> alter system set max_dump_file_size=2000m;
alter system set max_dump_file_size=2000m
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02065: illegal option for ALTER SYSTEM
2...SQL> alter system set max_dump_file_size=2000M;
System altered.
what is the difference between 2 statements does it alteres operating system blocks in statement 2. I need to conform it
it seems to be case sensitive, check the reference:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28320/initparams129.htm#CHDIABEI
instead of 2000M I would write 2G.
it doesn't alter any blocks it defined an upper limit for a trace file.
HTH
Similar Messages
-
Oracle Trace File generation for a session
Hi,
I am using oracle 10g(10.2.0.5) in RHEL5 server. i have used the exec dbms_system.set_sql_trace_in_session(147,3,TRUE); statement to trace a particular session. i am able to trace successfully but i have created a new table in that session where i am not able to find any create table statement in the generated trace file but i can find the insert statements which i performed on the newly created table in the trace file.
Does DDL statements not recorded in the trace events???
Regards,
007Hi;
Please see below doc which may helps you
DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION DOES NOT GENERATE TRACE FOR ACTIVE SESSION [ID 236178.1]
How To Enable SQL Trace for All New Sessions [ID 178923.1]
Tracing Sessions in Oracle Using the DBMS_SUPPORT Package [ID 62160.1]
Regard
Helios -
Gather Schema Statistics produces HUGE oracle trace file
Hi
I am running gather schema stats on my E-Biz 12.1.3 / 11.2.0.3 system
Each week we run Gather Schema Stats
I have noticed that when the job completes a 3g trace fuile is produced under the Oracle RDBMS home
I have tried un-checking the box when the COnc Request is submitted to DO NOT SAVE OUTPUT FILE but it is still procuced.
I dont want it and do not understand why it is produced. Anyone out there have a resolution?I have noticed that when the job completes a 3g trace fuile is produced under the Oracle RDBMS homeWhat is the file name/location? What is the contents of this trace file?
I have tried un-checking the box when the COnc Request is submitted to DO NOT SAVE OUTPUT FILE but it is still procuced.Do you have any debug/trace enabled on HRMS schema?
I dont want it and do not understand why it is produced. Anyone out there have a resolution?Was this working before? If yes, any changes been done since then?
What are the parameters you use to run "Gather Schema Statistics" concurrent program?
Thanks,
Hussein -
I gained a new database - and if it didnt have data in it or a PRODUCTION box I'd rebuild!
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition SP2 running 10g 10.2.0.3
Management Packs active: Database Diagnostics, Database Tuning, Database Configuration
user_dump_dest = c:\oracle\admiprod\udump
Executing:
select
u_dump.value || '/' ||
db_name.value || '_ora_' ||
v$process.spid ||
nvl2(v$process.traceid, '_' || v$process.traceid, null )
|| '.trc' "Trace File"
from
v$parameter u_dump
cross join v$parameter db_name
cross join v$process
join v$session
on v$process.addr = v$session.paddr
where
u_dump.name = 'user_dump_dest' and
db_name.name = 'db_name' and
v$session.audsid=sys_context('userenv','sessionid');
Results: C:\oracle\admin\prod\udump/prod_ora_388.trc (NOTE THE "/" IS CODED TO RETURN AS SUCH)
YET prod_ora_388.trc is NOT found at C:\oracle\admin\prod\udump OR anywhere on the C or associated D drives - any idea what is going on here, and if so how to correct it so the trc does show up?Did You enabled session tracing for that particular user?
If not, the of course You will find no trace file, just the possible name will be returned and path.
For first enable tracing, then look at trace directory for particular file.
And / is returned just because script is for unix. In your case you should replace it with \ as it is windows env.
and it's easier to identify trace files just adding some identifier to them with
alter session set tracefile_identifier ="some_name";
then in udump dierctory just search for this name. -
Meaning of mxlc in Oracle Trace file
I am seeing the following in my trace file:
Bind#3 oacdty=01 mxl=128(35) mxlc=36 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000010 frm=01 csi=31 siz=0 off=168
kxsbbbfp=ffffffff79f139a8 bln=128 avl=35 flg=01 value="1234 W 1234 West, West Groves City"
I am wondering what the mxlc value is? What does mxlc stand for?mxlc seems to be "max length char", only set sometimes.
For example, if mxlc is not relevant to the bind datatype it will be set as 00.
If you use NVARCHAR2 or CHAR semantics then it gets set.
With NUMBER:
SQL> alter session set tracefile_identifier = 'mxlc';
Session altered.
SQL> alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';
Session altered.
SQL> var x number
SQL> exec :x := 123456
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> From trace:
BEGIN :x := 123456; END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #47770109863064:c=1000,e=1151,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=0,tim=1347009856438026
BINDS #47770109863064:
Bind#0
oacdty=02 mxl=22(22) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000000 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b72586de050 bln=22 avl=00 flg=05With VARCHAR2:
SQL> var x varchar2(5);
SQL> exec :x := 'ABC';
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>From trace:
BEGIN :x := 'ABC'; END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #47770109863064:c=0,e=137,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=0,tim=1347010007896347
BINDS #47770109863064:
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=32(05) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000000 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b72586de048 bln=32 avl=00 flg=05With NVARCHAR2:
SQL> var x nvarchar2(5)
SQL> exec :x := 'MNO';
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> From trace:
BEGIN :x := 'MNO'; END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #47770109863064:c=1000,e=1929,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=0,tim=1347010109532414
BINDS #47770109863064:
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=32(10) mxlc=05 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000010 frm=02 csi=2000 siz=32 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b72586de048 bln=32 avl=00 flg=05With VARCHAR2, CHAR semantics:
SQL> var x varchar2(5 CHAR)
SQL> exec :x := 'XYZ';
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> From trace:
BEGIN :x := 'XYZ'; END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #47770109863064:c=1999,e=1734,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=0,tim=1347010159085263
BINDS #47770109863064:
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=32(05) mxlc=05 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000010 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b72586de048 bln=32 avl=00 flg=05 -
Bind values for complex datatype in Oracle trace file
If I run trace on oracle spatial queries, how can I get the detailed information of the bind variable value for sdo_geometry objects (the content of the sdo_geometry objects, e.g. coordinates... ) in the queries?
For example, in the query, SRID, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY, and SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY are bind variables. For SRID, I can find its value (number), but for sdo_elem_info_array and sdo_ordinate_array, I only got something like:
BINDS #1:
bind 0: dty=23 mxl=32(16) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=00 oacfl2=0 size=32 offset=0
bfp=0c0521dc bln=32 avl=16 flg=05
value=
Dump of memory from 0xC0521DC to 0xC0521EC
C0521D0 9E2362B1 [.b#.]
C0521E0 479F3EB7 8B3F2BA9 A1441E4C [.>.G.+?.L.D.]
I also tried to look at v$sql, v$sql_bind_data, v$sql_bind_capture views and haven't been able to find the values.
Thanks!If I run trace on oracle spatial queries, how can I get the detailed information of the bind variable value for sdo_geometry objects (the content of the sdo_geometry objects, e.g. coordinates... ) in the queries?
For example, in the query, SRID, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY, and SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY are bind variables. For SRID, I can find its value (number), but for sdo_elem_info_array and sdo_ordinate_array, I only got something like:
BINDS #1:
bind 0: dty=23 mxl=32(16) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=00 oacfl2=0 size=32 offset=0
bfp=0c0521dc bln=32 avl=16 flg=05
value=
Dump of memory from 0xC0521DC to 0xC0521EC
C0521D0 9E2362B1 [.b#.]
C0521E0 479F3EB7 8B3F2BA9 A1441E4C [.>.G.+?.L.D.]
I also tried to look at v$sql, v$sql_bind_data, v$sql_bind_capture views and haven't been able to find the values.
Thanks! -
Memory Dump for Bind Variable included in 10046 trace file
A curious thing I've seen today. While looking through an extended Oracle Trace file, I see the following:
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #26 len=88 dep=0 uid=28 oct=6 lid=28 tim=2667421262 hv=3259943383 ad='4bbb4ad8'
UPDATE V_QRTZ_TRIGGERS SET JOB_DATA = :1 WHERE TRIGGER_NAME = :2 AND TRIGGER_GROUP = :3
END OF STMT
PARSE #26:c=0,e=54,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=2667421260
BINDS #26:
bind 0: dty=113 mxl=3876(3876) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=03 oacfl2=0 size=3876 offset=0
bfp=0cd99aa4 bln=3876 avl=86 flg=05
value=
Dump of memory from 0x0CD99AA4 to 0x0CD99AFA
*CD99AA0 01005400 00002C01 00000100 [.T...,......]*
*CD99AB0 00000100 EB23EF03 581D0000 571D0000 [......#....X...W]*
*CD99AC0 0F000F00 00000000 0F005920 0E14E12F [........ Y../...]*
*CD99AD0 CDE21ADA 00000000 737E06D9 0400FB09 [..........~s....]*
*CD99AE0 07000F00 800387E6 A17B3F20 0000000E [........ ?{.....]*
*CD99AF0 571D0000 EE56CF00 00001500 [...W..V.....]*
bind 1: dty=1 mxl=128(45) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=03 oacfl2=10 size=256 offset=0
bfp=0cd99984 bln=128 avl=15 flg=05
value="EC-MHM Retrieve"
bind 2: dty=1 mxl=128(96) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=03 oacfl2=10 size=0 offset=128
bfp=0cd99a04 bln=128 avl=32 flg=01
value="2BBDE87AF15D4B5E867AB6482D7D58C8"
BINDS #9:
bind 0: dty=1 mxl=32(18) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=03 oacfl2=1 size=192 offset=0
bfp=0c2de90c bln=32 avl=18 flg=05
value="EC_SCHEDULE_PIN_TO"
bind 1: dty=1 mxl=128(15) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=13 oacfl2=1 size=0 offset=32
bfp=0c2de92c bln=128 avl=15 flg=01
value="EC-MHM Retrieve"
bind 2: dty=1 mxl=32(32) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=13 oacfl2=1 size=0 offset=160
bfp=0c2de9ac bln=32 avl=32 flg=01
value="2BBDE87AF15D4B5E867AB6482D7D58C8"
EXEC #9:c=15625,e=1060,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=1,tim=2667424863
FETCH #9:c=0,e=95,p=0,cr=4,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=1,og=1,tim=2667425091
FETCH #9:c=0,e=1,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=0,tim=2667425236
Is this normal and is it caused by size of Bind Variable?
Kind regards,
TRONdIt's normal and and happens due to bind variable datatype. In your case this is blob, (there are a couple of other datatypes - timestamp among other) which will be represented that way in the trace file.
Best regards
Maxim -
Trace file generation using oradebug
DB version : 10.2.0.4.0
OS : Solaris 5.10
I am trying to trace a session started by a Java application.
So, i've logged in as SYS. Got pid, spid from v$process. Then started the debug
SYS@MN_PROD>oradebug setospid 2523
SYS@MN_PROD>oradebug event 10046 trace name context forever, level 32and closed it using
oradebug event 10046 trace name context offWhen i type
ORADEBUG TRACEFILE_NAMEIt shows a filename in bdump directory. But i can't find this file in bdump or udump.
Is there any init.ora setting i need to do to get this file generated?Decimal Binary Description
1 0001 Emit statistics for parse, execute, fetch, commit, and rollback database calls (standard sql_trace)
2 0010 Unknown
4 0100 Emit values for SQL bind variables (also called “placeholders”)
8 1000 Emit statistics for Oracle kernel internal function calls (also called “wait events”) listed in v$event_name
These levels can be combined as if by a bitwise or function to produce combinations of data in an Oracle trace file.
A value of 15 is just a combination of all 4 preceeding values -
How to use trace file information?
Hello.
I got trace files in $O_H/network/trace/ listener.trc and in
$O_H/rdbms/log/ora_orcl_22846.trc and others in the same dir. SO
how can I get any understandable form? ( All this numbers and
letters say nothing to me :((. Maybe I should read some manual?)
Thank You.
nullANdrey (guest) wrote:
: Hello.
: I got trace files in $O_H/network/trace/ listener.trc and in
: $O_H/rdbms/log/ora_orcl_22846.trc and others in the same dir.
SO
: how can I get any understandable form? ( All this numbers and
: letters say nothing to me :((. Maybe I should read some
manual?)
: Thank You.
Listener trace should be humanly readable by itself and
oracle trace files should be processed by using tkprof.
null -
EJB Exceptions generate entry in trace file
Every exception I throw an exception from an EJB generates a stack trace in the oracle trace file. These are business rule errors like "Withdrawal Denied: Insuffient Funds". Can I turn this off? The J2EE spec says that the container should notify when an EJBException is throw to the container. How do I get the container to ignore my custom exception? My exception class is just derived from RemoteException like in the below Oracle example.
package employee;
public class EmpException extends RemoteException
public EmpException(String msg)
super(msg);
nullPlease refer:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/09-mar/o29asktom.html?_template=/ocom/print
Edited by: SKU on 19-Dec-2009 05:10 -
TRACE FILE의 PERMISSION 조정하는 방법
제품 : ORACLE SERVER
작성날짜 : 1998-04-28
제목
====
oracle trace file 을 dba group 에 속하지 않는 user 들에게
permission 을 허용하는 방법
문제
====
Oracle 의 모든 trace file 은 owner 가 oracle user, group 이
dba 이고 640 permission 을 갖습니다.
예를 들면, -rw-r----- oracle dba
따라서, UNIX 에서는 $ORACLE_HOME/log 나 initSID.ora, configSID.ora 에
지정된 directory 에 생성되는 모든 trace file 은 위의 permission 을
갖기 때문에 dba group 에 속하지 않은 사용자들은 trace file 을
access 할 수 없도록 되어 있습니다.
해결
====
tracefiles_public =true 라는 parameter 를 initSID.ora 에
추가후 db restartup 하고, 일반 사용자들의 umask 를 000 으로
setting 하시면 됩니다.
1. cd $ORACLE_HOME/dbs
2. UNIX,VMS 의 init<sid>.ora 에 다음을 추가하십시오.
tracefiles_public=true
3. save init<sid>.ora
4. restartup database
위 작업은 oracle trace file 이 trace 를 생성하는 사용자의 umask 에
의해 trace file 의 permission 이 결정하도록 합니다.
일반 사용자 가 OS prompt 상태에서
$umask 000
으로 한 다음 sql trace file 등을 생성하는 작업을 했을 때, 화일의
permission 이 다음과 같이 생깁니다.
-rw-rw-r-- 1 oracle dba 2945 Apr 16 10:11 ora_28494.trc
즉, trace file 의 owner와 group 은 여전히 oracle, dba 이기 때문에, umask의
세번째 field 가 0 이어야 dba group 이 아닌 일반 사용자 들이
trace file 을 읽을 수 있습니다.
참고
====
재 기동 작업시에 다음 에러가 발생한다면, 위 파라미터의 spelling 등을 다시
확인하십시오.
ora-1078
01078, 00000, "failure in processing system parameters"
// *Cause: Failure during processing of init.ora parameters during
// system startup.
// *Action: Further diagnostic information should be in the errorstack.
lcc-122
122, 0, "unrecognized keyword [%.*s]"
// *Cause: You have misspelled the parameter name
// *Action: Spell the parameter name correctly -
A problem within a third-party application is causing it to create and abandon Oracle sessions. At times three hundred or more abandoned sessions accumulated in the instance. The software company is working on the problem. Oracle's background processes will get rid of those sessions after several hours, but at times there were so many they caused the server to start using paging space. We wrote a SQL*Plus script to identify the abandoned sessions and kill them with command "alter system kill session <sid, serial#> immediate;". We automated the execution of the script a week ago. Today I noticed that in my udump directory an Oracle trace file has been created each time our script kills a session. A single trace file is created regardless of how many sessions are killed. No errors appear in the trace file.
Is the creation of these trace files an indication that problems have occurred or are they there for information only?
Since I know how and why the sessions are being killed, is it safe to ignore the trace files?
Thank you,
BillThe OS is AIX 5.2. The database server is 10.2.0.2. We are in the processing of upgrading to AIX 7.1 and database server 11.2.0.3.6.
The script does not enable tracing for the SQL*Plus session.
Below is the alert log message from a session killed at 11:22, and the corresponding trace file created at that same time:
From alert_<sid>.log:
Wed Jul 31 11:22:01 2013
Immediate Kill Session#: 1119, Serial#: 59885
Immediate Kill Session: sess: 70000014dc4a7e0 OS pid: 267254
/u02/admin/EXPRESS/udump $ ls -l express_ora_113358.trc
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 2276 Jul 31 11:22 express_ora_113358.trc
/u02/admin/EXPRESS/udump $ pg express_ora_113358.trc
Dump file /u02/admin/EXPRESS/udump/express_ora_113358.trc
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
ORACLE_HOME = /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0
System name: AIX
Node name: navis
Release: 2
Version: 5
Machine: 0005CD8C4C00
Instance name: EXPRESS
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 225
Unix process pid: 113358, image: oracleEXPRESS@navis
*** ACTION NAME:() 2013-07-31 11:22:01.181
*** MODULE NAME:(SQL*Plus) 2013-07-31 11:22:01.181
*** SERVICE NAME:(EXPRESS.WORLD) 2013-07-31 11:22:01.181
*** SESSION ID:(1723.61000) 2013-07-31 11:22:01.181
SO: 70000014d44d278, type: 2, owner: 0, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
(process) Oracle pid=463, calls cur/top: 0/700000139166298, flag: (0) -
int error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0
(post info) last post received: 108 0 4
last post received-location: kslpsr
last process to post me: 70000014d36c398 1 6
last post sent: 0 0 24
last post sent-location: ksasnd
last process posted by me: 70000014d36c398 1 6
(latch info) wait_event=0 bits=0
Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: 70000014d6aec00
O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 267254
OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 267254, image: oracleEXPRESS@navis
Short stack dump:
ksdxfstk+002c<-ksdxcb+04e4<-sspuser+0074<-00004CB0<-nttrd+0120<-nsprecv+0750<-ns
rdr+0114<-nsdo+1714<-nsbrecv+0040<-nioqrc+04a8<-opikndf2+0688<-opitsk+088c<-opii
no+0990<-opiodr+0adc<-opidrv+0474<-sou2o+0090<-opimai_real+01bc<-main+0098<-__st
art+0090
Dump of memory from 0x070000014D2CC3B0 to 0x070000014D2CC5B8
70000014D2CC3B0 00000004 00000000 07000001 39DA8D48 [............9..H]
70000014D2CC3C0 00000010 0003139D 07000001 39166298 [............9.b.]
70000014D2CC3D0 00000003 0003139D 07000001 4C73D508 [............Ls..]
70000014D2CC3E0 0000000B 0003139D 07000001 4DC4A7E0 [............M...]
70000014D2CC3F0 00000004 00031291 00000000 00000000 [................]
70000014D2CC400 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................]
Repeat 26 times
70000014D2CC5B0 00000000 00000000 [........]
Thanks,
Bill -
Trace file size reached the max size
Hi All,
This morning we had a issue with the oracle trace file. When I looked the alert log, i figured that there was an error saying Trace file reached max size. Question is what happens to the processes that tries to write to the trace file when the trace file was full?
My thinking is, the process, that tries to write to trace file, will hang until the trace file size is incresed. Am I correct. Please share you thoughts
Thanks
--Process will continue, it will not hang. Trace information will not be written once the trace file limit is reached.
HTH
Srini -
Creating trace file in oracle 10g forms
hii there,
I have developed an application in oracle 10g. but it's too slow . Now i have to trace forms . How can trace oracle forms.
please send it in details as early as possible. I don't know about this trace file generation.
-----SachinHi,
To run SQL trace for a form :
a. Get to the point in the form where you want to turn trace on.
For example, if the problem occurs on the commit, wait until you are
ready to commit, THEN turn trace on.
b. Turn tracing on. In GUI versions: Help - Tools - Trace, enable tracing.
c. Execute the steps you want to trace.
d. Turn tracing off. In GUI versions: Help - Tools - Trace, disable tracing.
The trace file will be written to the subdirectory specified in the
'user_dump_dest' parameter in the INIT.ORA file. -
Unable to write trace files in Background dump destination in oracle 10g
Hi All,
OS version : RHEL 5.7
DB version : 10.2.0.4
cluster : 2 node RAC database
Today I faced a strange behaviour for one of our production database. Its a 2-node rac database. On the first node there is no auto generation of trace files in the BAckground dump destination. I am able to see trace files of second in its background dump dest. But the strange behaviour occurs on the first node. I see only Alert log file in the background dump dest . Inspite of getting an error which shows trace file generated but no file occurs in the bdump. The following is the error but physically there no trace file generated:
Errors in file /oracle/db/admin/<sid>/bdump/<sid>j0011558.trc:
ORA-12012: error on auto execute of job 94377
ORA-12008: error in materialized view refresh pathCan anyone have any idea for this strange behaviour. There are no maintenance script for removal of trace files.
Regards,
Imran KhanORA-00980:synonym translation is no longer valid
Cause:The synonym used is based on a table, view, or synonym that no longer exists.
Action:Replace the synonym with the name of the object it references or re-create the synonym so that it refers to a valid table, view, or synonym.
Check the following :
From User Number 1 : Osama1
create table osama_table as select empname from scott.emp;
create public synonym osama_tbl for osama_table ;
grant select on osama_tbl to user_b;
From User Number 2 : Osama2
select 1 from osama_tbl;
SMITH
ALLEN
JONES
MARTIN
From User Number 1 : Osama1
drop table osama_table;
From User Number 2 : Osama2
select 1 from osama_tbl;
ORA-00980: synonym translation is no longer valid
Maybe you are looking for
-
the sleep button on my ipod touch is stuck down and i cannot turn it on or charge it. any ideas?
-
Changing a html file to a word document
hi there i have just purchased a new imac and installed microsoft office 2011 home and student. I have made a cv on a web site which then asks you to save as a word document, the problem been is that it downloads the file as a html file so i cannot m
-
How do i create a gallery page that you can click on an image, expand it and move left or right to see more images?
-
Black border around my mouse pointer
Since a few days, I have a thick black border around my mouse pointer, always following the movement of the pointer. How can I bring this away? Thanks for help Ueli
-
Want to know about User exit in detail
Hi ALL, I M NEW TO sap ABAP. I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT USER EXIT IN DETAIL. PLS DO THE NEEDFUL . If there are eny document regarding this pls mail to this id [email protected] thanks and regards Nandha