Oracle VM Storage live Migration

Good Morning,
i am very new to Oracle VM. But i used to work a lot with other virtualization "Engines".
Now i have got set a a new OVM Cluster. with 2 OVM Server (2.2). With SAN .
So i got 2 SAN LUNS clustered over the 2 OVM Servers.
I used to have Storage live Migration (Storage Vmotion) but here i cant find anything.
In Cirtix i know there is a way (xe ). But there is no xe on OVM.
But i need to move mv VM-Guest from SAN (LUN1) to LUN2....
Is there a way to do it on OVM to (without stopping the VM Guest)?
Thanks a lot!

Yes there is (sort of, unsupported):
http://web.archive.org/web/20100801134134/http://wiki.oracle.com/page/Oracle+VM+Live+Storage+Migration
(no idea what happened to the wiki, but the archive still has it)

Similar Messages

Storage live migration leaves files in the old location

I have Hyper-v cluster and a new Scale-put file server cluster. I am in the process of storage live migrating my vms into the SOFS cluster. Some Vms migrate over fine and other leave references to the old storage location when the migration completes.
I have configured constrained delegation between the Hyper-V host and also SMB delegation on the sofs nodes.
Any ideas on why it is not the storage live migration is not completely migrating over to the new location?
thanks so much for your time

Yes i have all updates on sofs cluster nodes a hyper-v cluster nodes.
Its weird that hard drive vm property shows new location, but seems that the vm xml config files are actually still referenced and being used in vm properties.
Thanks for the help

Hyper-V Storage Live Migration: Copy instead of move?

Have a 2012 R2 Hyper-V Cluster with a HP MSA 2000 Storage. No storage pools or storage spaces, just 4 LUN's with NTFS Volumes that are all converted to CSV's.
Have to perform VM migration from VM's that resides on a CSV with an underlying RAID 5 volume to another CSV with an underlying RAID 50 volume. Could perform the operation without any error from the failover cluster manager (move - virtual machine storge) on
the VM.
The problem is that when I check C:\ClusterStorage\Volume1 (the old place of the VM) and C:\ClusterStorage\Volume2 (the new place of the VM), all VM files are still in both locations! Apparently, a "Copy" operation instead of a "move" operation
was performed.
- Why are the source files not have been deleted after the successful storage migration?
- Is it safe to manually delete the VM files in C:\ClusterStorage\Volume1?
Thank you in advance for any help.
Franz

Hi FranzSchenk,
To perform a move, FOCM first copys the files over to the new location and then moves the mahine over to the new location with all memory and machine writes before then removing the old files. If the files haven't been removed (this does happen)
it could be permission's that stop the files being removed.
It would be worth checking the running VMs and checking where its pointing for the virtual drives and perhaps look at where its BIN file is for memory and where the XML machine configuration is located. If all are pointing to the new location
then it would be safe to delete the old files.
Kind Regards
Michael Coutanche
Blog:
Twitter: LinkedIn:
Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.
Hi Michael
Do you have more specific information what kind of permission issue you mean, and how we can correct that? And why is no warning or error message visible or in the eventlogs that the source files have not been deleted during the live strorage migration?
Kind regards, Franz

Live Migrating Virtual Machines with Shared VHDx

I am facing problems when live migrating a Virtual Machine that is using Shared VHDx. The Virtual Machine gets migrated that is the configuration gets migrated, but the Virtual Machine fails to start up and if manually tried, it fails too.
What is the method to to live migrate virtual machines that are using Shared VHDx. Thanks in advance.

Another couple of gotchas:
You cannot do host-level backups of the guest cluster. This is the same as it always was. You will have to install backup agents in the guest cluster nodes and back them up as if they were physical machines.
You cannot perform a hot-resize of the shared VHDX. But you can hot-add more shared VHDX files to the clustered VMs.
You cannot Storage Live Migrate the shared VHDX file. You can move the other VM files and perform normal Live Migration.
as Long as you have your shared VHDx on a SMB3 Share you also could have the Nodes of the Guest Cluster on different Hyper-V Hosts.

Oracle vm 3.1.1 ( kernel 2.6.39-200.1.9.el5uek ) : Live migration breaks

Hello,
we are upgrading with last update of OVS the servers.. After we upgraded one server (called A) from 2.6.39-200.1.1.el5uek to 2.6.39-200.1.9.el5uek with certified yum repository from Oracle, the live migration not working anymore in correct mode.
If I will migrate one guest from another server to server A or vice versa , the results are the same, the 3%-10% of packets dropped. Is it a normal behaviour , if the kernel are different ? Or are this kernel/driver/xen bugged ?
Obviously the version of OVS are always 3.1.1 and the oracle vm the 3.1.1 build 478, and previously the live migration always worked well. No errors are visible and the job gone well.
Kind Regards
Edited by: user10717184 on Oct 29, 2012 12:46 AM

I try to migrate with xm command but the problem not disappear .
The xm command not give any result code. it finished correctly, by the way or we lost 3-10% of packets or stop pinging .
[root@******** ~]# xm migrate -l ****UUID*** ****SERVER_OVS_NAME***
[root@******** ~]# echo $?
0
Now the server have both the new kernel, but it continues to have the problem. The strange thing is that if you return to previous server OVS, the pinging restart, sometime.

Live migration of VM from CSV storage - local storage

I have a VM I want to migrate from our CSV storage onto local storage. However, I can't find a way to complete this.
Live migration won't give me the local disks as an acceptable destination.
During this live migration even if I say that I don't want it to be highly available, the next part to the wizard doesn't give me any options whatsoever to move it anywhere.
I've tried moving it via the Hyper-V manager - which then directs me to the Failover Cluster Manager. Even there I can't give it a suitable destination on the local disk to stick the machine.
What am I missing in this?
Is there a way to do this without manually copying the VHDs to that location and creating a new VM?

As an additional option, you can use one time backup/restore procedure, using whatever free backup tool you want to.
We have done something similar with VeeamZIP that in many ways resembles simple zip-utility for VMs.
We had backed up given VM firstly, and, then, during restoration procedure selected local disks as the datastore the VM should be restored to; worked like a charm.
Kind regards, Leonardo.

Step for oracle database storage migration

Hi all
Need a help for database storage migration from old storage to new storage. Please advise and given step to migrate the database storage.
Database version: 9i,10g(ASM),10g and 11g (ASM)

Hi;
Your question is not clear. Migration from what to what?
For all migration question please review:
Master Note For Oracle Database Upgrades and Migrations [ID 1152016.1]
Different Upgrade Methods For Upgrading Your Database [ID 419550.1]
Migration of Oracle Database Instances Across OS Platforms[ID 733205.1]
How To Use RMAN CONVERT DATABASE on Source Host for Cross Platform Migration [ID 413586.1]
PS:Please dont forget to change thread status to answered if it possible when u belive your thread has been answered, it pretend to lose time of other forums user while they are searching open question which is not answered,thanks for understanding
Regard
Helios

Oracle VM (XEN) and Live Migration throws PCI error

First off, anyone using a HS21 XM blade with Oracle VM? Anyone attempted a live-migration, does it work?
When attempting a live migration on a HS21 XM blade we get the following errors and the host hangs:
102 I Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:38 (CADCOVMA02) Blade reboot
103 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:26 (CADCOVMA02) Software critical interrupt.
104 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:21 (CADCOVMA02) SMI Hdlr: 00150700 PERR: Slave signaled parity error B/D/F/Slot=07000300 Vend=8086 Dev=3 0C Status=8000
105 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:19 (CADCOVMA02) SMI Hdlr: 00150900 SERR/PERR Detected on PCI bus
106 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:19 (CADCOVMA02) SMI Hdlr: 00150700 PERR: Slave signaled parity error B/D/F/Slot=00020000 Vend=8086 Dev=25F7 Statu
107 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:18 (CADCOVMA02) PCI PERR: parity error.
108 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:17 (CADCOVMA02) SMI Hdlr: 00150900 SERR/PERR Detected on PCI bus
109 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:17 (CADCOVMA02) SMI Hdlr: 00150400 SERR: Device Signaled SERR B/D/F/Slot=07000300 Vend=8086 Dev=350C Sta us=4110
110 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:16 (CADCOVMA02) SMI Hdlr: 00150400 SERR: Device Signaled SERR B/D/F/Slot=00020000 Vend=8086 Dev=25F7 Status=4110
111 E Blade_02 08/10/08, 08:46:14 (CADCOVMA02) PCI system error.
any ideas? I've called IBM support but their options are reseat the hardware or replace it. this happens on more than one blade so we're assuming it has something to do with oracle VM. Thanks!

Hi Eduardo,
How are things going ?
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Live migration from oracle 8.0.3.0.0 to oracle 10g

Hello everyone,
I have Oracle 8.0.3.0.0 running on Windows NT platform. I wish to migrate from Oracle 8.0.3.0.0 to Oracle 10g. And I wish to do it without shutting down my Oracle 8 server. Sort of live migration. Since transaction rate is very high. And putting down the server would mean hanging up whole work. Is it possible. If yes what all hardware and software requirements are there? Or Import and Export is the only option,
In anticipation of your guidlines,
Durgesh
919416228922

Durgesh,
 No, you cannot migrate directly from 8.0.3 to 10g (either 10gR1 and 10gR2). Read the upgrade guide which concern your target 10g release :
 Oracle Database Upgrade Guide 10g Release 2 (10.2)
 Oracle Database Upgrade Guide 10g Release 1 (10.1)
 Nicolas.

Live Migration in OVM 3.0.2 should have an interruption or not?

Live Migration in OVM 3.0.2 should have an interruption or not?
I mean: I have 2 OVM Servers 3.0.2 & FibreChannel Storage
I installed a Oracle Linux 5.6 x64 in paravirtualized Mode
When I do a Live Migration the Virtual Machine changes in seconds to the other server with the lock image. Meanwhile I ping to the machine & Im inside the command line.
Communication interrupt like 10 seconds or sometimes more & command line does not work for the same time
Is that correct?
Greetings
Alex Dávila

alex davila wrote:
Right now Iam testing connectivity & when I do live migration the interruption is minimal, just 1 ping lost
I don't know why yesterday delay secondsYou might want to talk to your networking guys to make sure that PORTFAST is enabled (if you have Cisco switches) or that you have rapid STP configured. Keep in mind that we switch the MAC address of the guest from one physical server to another. The delay you saw was your network noticing and re-routing packets to the new location.

Live migration suddenly won't work on 3.1.1

I've done many live migrations over the last few months, with no problems. Suddenly, they don't work any more. Here's what I see:
I start the migration from the Manager.
The VM immediately disappears from the list of VMs on the source servers, and appears on the destination server.
The job shows "in progress", and it NEVER completes.
The "% complete" for the job never says anything but ZERO.
If I look at the 'details' on the 'in progress' migration job, it says:
Job Construction Phase
begin()
Appended operation 'Bridge Configure Operation' to object '0004fb00002000005c945b4212271249 (network.BondPort (2) in oravm3.acbl.net)'.
Appended operation 'Virtual Machine Migrate' to object '0004fb000006000066c8e49bc5ab54b0 (jiplcm01)'.
commit()
Completed Step: COMMIT
Objects and Operations
Object (IN_USE): [Server] e2:a3:70:c6:67:89:e1:11:bb:8e:e4:1f:13:eb:92:b2 (oravm3.acbl.net)
Object (IN_USE): [BondPort] 0004fb00002000005c945b4212271249 (network.BondPort (2) in oravm3.acbl.net)
Operation: Bridge Configure Operation
Object (IN_USE): [Server] 92:0f:60:b4:84:91:e1:11:aa:cb:e4:1f:13:eb:d2:3a (oravm2.acbl.net)
Object (IN_USE): [VirtualMachine] 0004fb000006000066c8e49bc5ab54b0 (jiplcm01)
Operation: Virtual Machine Migrate
Job Running Phase at 13:10 on Wed, Jan 2, 2013
Job Participants: [92:0f:60:b4:84:91:e1:11:aa:cb:e4:1f:13:eb:d2:3a (oravm2.acbl.net)]
Actioner
Starting operation 'Bridge Configure Operation' on object '0004fb00002000005c945b4212271249 (network.BondPort (2) in oravm3.acbl.net)'
Bridge [0004fb001018c4c] already exists (and should exist) on interface [bond1] on server [oravm3.acbl.net]; skipping bridge creation
Completed operation 'Bridge Configure Operation' completed with direction ==> DONE
Starting operation 'Virtual Machine Migrate' on object '0004fb000006000066c8e49bc5ab54b0 (jiplcm01)'
Job failed commit (internal) due to Caught during invoke method: java.net.SocketException: Socket closed
Wed Jan 02 13:11:36 EST 2013
com.oracle.odof.exception.InternalException: Caught during invoke method: java.net.SocketException: Socket closed
Wed Jan 02 13:11:36 EST 2013
at com.oracle.odof.OdofExchange.invokeMethod(OdofExchange.java:956)
at com.oracle.ovm.mgr.api.job.InternalJobProxy.objectCommitter(Unknown Source)
at com.oracle.ovm.mgr.api.job.JobImpl.internalJobCommit(JobImpl.java:281)
at com.oracle.ovm.mgr.api.job.JobImpl.commit(JobImpl.java:651)
at com.oracle.ovm.mgr.faces.model.JobEO$CommitWork.run(JobEO.java:233)
at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:183)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Socket closed
at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:237)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.peek(ObjectInputStream.java:2248)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.peek(ObjectInputStream.java:2541)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.peekByte(ObjectInputStream.java:2551)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1296)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:350)
at com.oracle.odof.io.AbstractSocket.receive(AbstractSocket.java:220)
at com.oracle.odof.io.AbstractSocket.receive(AbstractSocket.java:173)
at com.oracle.odof.OdofExchange.send(OdofExchange.java:473)
at com.oracle.odof.OdofExchange.send(OdofExchange.java:427)
at com.oracle.odof.OdofExchange.invokeMethod(OdofExchange.java:938)
... 7 more
Anyone have any idea what the problem is? What can I do to gather useful information?

Job failed commit (internal) due to Caught during invoke method: java.net.SocketException: Socket closed
at com.oracle.ovm.mgr.api.job.InternalJobProxy.objectCommitter(Unknown Source)
It looks to me that either the target server does not have access to everything needed to complete the migration (access to the shared pool, access to the shared storage and etc) or the target server is having an issue communicating with the VM Manager.
I wish such error were more descriptive but I believe the "unknown source" and "socket closed" indicates such a problem.

Hyper-v 2012 r2 slow throughputs on network / live migrations

Hi, maybe someone can point me in the right direction, I have 10 servers 5 Dell r210s and 5 Dell R320's, I have basically converted these servers to standalone hyper-v 2012 servers, so there is no clustering on any at the moment.
Each server is configured with 2 1Gb nics teamed via a virtual switch, now when I copt files between server 1 and 2 for example I see 100MBs throughput, but if I copy a file to server 3 at the same time the file copy load splits the 100MBs throughput between
the 2 copy processes. I was under the impression if I copied 2 files to 2 totally different servers the load would basically be split across the 2 nics effectively giving me 2Gbs throughput but this does not seem to be the case. I have played around with tcpip
large send offloads, jumbo packets, disabled vmq on the cards, they are broadcoms. :-( but it doesn't really seem to make a difference with all of these settings.
The other issue is If I live migrate a 12Gb vm machine running only 2gb ram, effectively just an o/s it takes between 15 to 20 minutes to migrate, I have played around with the advanced settings, smb, compression, tcpip not real game changers, BUT if I shut
town the vm and migrate it, it takes, just under 3 and a half minutes to move across.
I am really stumped here, I am busy in a test phase of hyper-v but cant find any definitive documents relating to this stuff.

Hi Mark,
The servers (hyper-v 2012 r2) are all basically configured with ssvmm2012R2 where they all have teamed 1Gb pNics, into a virtual switch, then there are vNics for the Vmcloud, live migration etc. The physical network is 2 Netgear Gs724T switches which
are interlinked and each servers 1st nic is plugged into the switch1 and the second nic is plugged into the switch2.See Below Image) The hyper-v port is set to independent Hyper-v load balancing.
The R320 servers are running raid 5 sas drives, the R210s have 1Tb drives mirrored. The servers all are using DAS storage, we have not moved to looking at using iscsi and san is out the question at the moment.
I am currently testing between 2x 320s and 2x R210s, I am not copying data to the vm's yets, I am basically testing the transfer between the actual hosts at the moment by copying a 4Gb file manually, After testing the live migrations I decided to test to
see the transfer rates between the servers first, I have been playing around with the offload settings and rss, what I don't understand is yesterday, the copy between the servers was running up to 228Mbs ie (using both nics) when copying
the file between the servers, and then a few hours later it only was copying at 50/60Mbs, but its now back at 113Mbs seemingly to be only using one nic.
I was under the impression if you copy a file between 2 servers the nicks could use the 2gb bandwidth, but after reading many posts they say only one nic, so how did the copies get up to 2Gb yesterday. Then again if you copy files between 3 servers, then
each copy would use one nic, basically giving you 2Gbs, but this is again not being seen.
Regards Keith

Server 2012 cluster - virtual machine live migration does not work

Hi,
We have a hyper-v cluster with two nodes running Windows Server 2012. All the configurations are identical.
When I try to make a Live migration from one node to the other I get an error message saying:
Live migration of 'Virtual Machine XXXXXX' failed.
I get no other error messages, not even in event viewer. This same happens with all of our virtual machines.
A normal Quick migration works just fine for all of the virtual machines, so network configuration should not be an issue.
The above error message does not provide much information.

Hi,
Please check whether your configuration meet live migration requirement:
Two (or more) servers running Hyper-V that:
Support hardware virtualization.
Yes they support virtualization.
Are using processors from the same manufacturer (for example, all AMD or all Intel).
Both Servers are identical and brand new Fujitsu-Siemens RX300S7 with the same kind of processor (Xeon E5-2620).
Belong to either the same Active Directory domain, or to domains that trust each other.
Both nodes are in the same domain.
Virtual machines must be configured to use virtual hard disks or virtual Fibre Channel disks (no physical disks).
All of the vitual machines have virtual hard disks.
Use of a private network is recommended for live migration network traffic.
Have tried this, but does not help.
Requirements for live migration in a cluster:
Windows Failover Clustering is enabled and configured.
Yes
Cluster Shared Volume (CSV) storage in the cluster is enabled.
Yes
Requirements for live migration using shared storage:
All files that comprise a virtual machine (for example, virtual hard disks, snapshots, and configuration) are stored on an SMB share. They are all on the same CSV
Permissions on the SMB share have been configured to grant access to the computer accounts of all servers running Hyper-V.
Requirements for live migration with no shared infrastructure:
No extra requirements exist.
Also please refer to this article to check whether you have finished all preparation works for live migration:
Virtual Machine Live Migration Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831435.aspx
Hyper-V: Using Live Migration with Cluster Shared Volumes in Windows Server 2008 R2
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd446679(v=WS.10).aspx
Configure and Use Live Migration on Non-clustered Virtual Machines
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134199.aspx
Hope this helps!
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are
TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
here.
Lawrence
TechNet Community Support
I have also read all of the technet articles but can't find anything that could help.

Hyper-V replica vs Shared Nothing Live Migration

Shared Nothing Live Migration allows to transport your VM over the WAN without shutting it down (how much time it takes on io intensive vm is another story)
  Hyper-V replica does not allow to perform the DR switch without shutdown operation on primary site VM !
why can't it take the VM live to the DR ?
that's because if we use Shared Nothing across the WAN, we don't use the data that Hyper-V replica can and then it also breaks everything hyper-V replica does.
Point is: how to take the VM to DR in running state, what is the best way to do that ?
Shahid Roofi

Hi Shahid,
Hyper-V Replica is designed as a DR technology, not as a technique to move VMs. It assumes that should you require it, the source VM would probably be offline and therefore you would be powering up the passive copy from a previous point in time
as its not a true synchronous replica copy. It does give you the added benefit to be able to run a planned failover which as you say, powers of the VM first, runs a final Sync then powers the new VM up. Obviously you cant have the duplicate copy of this VM
running all the time at the remote site, otherwise you would have a split brain situation for network traffic.
Like the live migration the shared nothing live migration is a technology aimed at moving a VM, but as you know offers the ability to do this without having shared storage and only requires a network connection. When initiated moves the whole
VM, well copies the virtual drive and memory before sending machine writes to both, then only to the new VM when they both match. With regards to the speed, I assume you have the SNLM setup to compress data before sending across the wire?
If you want a true live migration between remote sites, one way would be to have a SAN array between both sites synchronously replicating data, then stretch the Hyper-V cluster across both sites. Obviously this is a very expensive solution but perhaps
the perfect scenario.
Kind Regards
Michael Coutanche
Blog:
Twitter:   LinkedIn:
Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

Hyper-V guest SQL 2012 cluster live migration failure

I have two IBM HX5 nodes connected to IBM DS5300. Hyper-V 2012 cluster was built on blades. In HV cluster was made six virtual machines, connected to DS5300 via HV Virtual SAN. These VMs was formed a guest SQL Cluster. Databases' files are placed on
DS5300 storage and available through VM FibreChannel Adapters. IBM MPIO Module is installed on all hosts and VMs.
SQL Server instances work without problem. But! When I try to live migrate SQL VM to another HV node an SQL Instance fails. In SQL error log I see:
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid1s Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid1s SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid1s Write error during log flush.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid55 Error: 9001, Severity: 21, State: 4.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid55 The log for database 'Admin' is not available. Check the event log for related error messages. Resolve any errors and restart the database.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid55 Database Admin was shutdown due to error 9001 in routine 'XdesRMFull::CommitInternal'. Restart for non-snapshot databases will be attempted after all connections to the database are aborted.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.31 spid36s Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.31 spid36s fcb::close-flush: Operating system error (null) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.31 spid36s Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.31 spid36s fcb::close-flush: Operating system error (null) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.32 spid36s Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.32 spid36s fcb::close-flush: Operating system error (null) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.32 spid36s Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.32 spid36s fcb::close-flush: Operating system error (null) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.33 spid36s Starting up database 'Admin'.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s 349 transactions rolled forward in database 'Admin' (6:0). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s SQLServerLogMgr::FixupLogTail (failure): alignBuf 0x000000001A75D000, writeSize 0x400, filePos 0x156adc00
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s blankSize 0x3c0000, blkOffset 0x1056e, fileSeqNo 1313, totBytesWritten 0x0
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s fcb status 0x42, handle 0x0000000000000BC0, size 262144 pages
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s SQLServerLogMgr::FixupLogTail: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s Error: 5159, Severity: 24, State: 13.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) on file "v:\MSSQL\log\Admin\Log.ldf" during FixupLogTail.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s Error: 3414, Severity: 21, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s An error occurred during recovery, preventing the database 'Admin' (6:0) from restarting. Diagnose the recovery errors and fix them, or restore from a known good backup. If errors are not corrected or expected,
contact Technical Support.
In windows system log I see a lot of warnings like this:
- <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
- <System>
<Provider
Name="Microsoft-Windows-Ntfs" Guid="{3FF37A1C-A68D-4D6E-8C9B-F79E8B16C482}" />
<EventID>140</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>3</Level>
<Task>0</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8000000000000008</Keywords>
<TimeCreated
SystemTime="2013-06-19T06:39:44.314400200Z" />
<EventRecordID>25239</EventRecordID>
<Correlation
/>
<Execution
ProcessID="4620" ThreadID="4284" />
<Channel>System</Channel>
<Computer>sql-node-5.local.net</Computer>
<Security
UserID="S-1-5-21-796845957-515967899-725345543-17066" />
</System>
- <EventData>
<Data Name="VolumeId">\\?\Volume{752f0849-6201-48e9-8821-7db897a10305}</Data>
<Data Name="DeviceName">\Device\HarddiskVolume70</Data>
<Data Name="Error">0x80000011</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
The system failed to flush data to the transaction log. Corruption may occur in VolumeId: \\?\Volume{752f0849-6201-48e9-8821-7db897a10305}, DeviceName: \Device\HarddiskVolume70.
({Device Busy}
The device is currently busy.)
There aren't any error or warning in HV hosts.

Hello,
I am trying to involve someone more familiar with this topic for a further look at this issue. Sometime delay might be expected from the job transferring. Your patience is greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Regards,
Fanny Liu
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Fanny Liu
TechNet Community Support

Oracle VM Storage live Migration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for