Order as Direct material check is not coming for shoppingcart with material

Hi,
We are using portal indpendent navigation screen (NWBC) SRM 7.0 extended classic scenario. Order as direct material check box is not coming in item data of shopping cart for shopping against the material. I checked every thing but not able to get the check box for order as direct material.
Please advise what to do.
(N. Kiran Kumar)

Hi,
Please check that the component configuration has not hidden the field, it is under the following configuration:
General Information About the Application and Component
Application: /SAPSRM/WDA_L_FPM_GAF
Web Dynpro Component: /SAPSRM/WDC_DODC_SC_I_BD
Window Information: IV_L_FPC_CA_DETAILS
View Information: V_DODC_SC_I_BD
Configuration ID: /SAPSRM/WDCC_FPM_DODC_SC_I_BD_WI
Component Element you are looking for is ORDER_DIRECT_MAT_LABEL
Also check if someone has hidden the field using WD customizing onscreen, right click over the screen and choose 'User Settings', here check if any fields are hidden.
Regards,
Jason

Similar Messages

Assign Source of supply is not working for contract with material group

Dear Experts,
I have searched all the threads and gone through before posting my query. So i would ask moderators to go through the thread properly before rejecting this.
We have value contracts with respect to a particular material group without material and with item category W in the contract item, Please note that for the materials with this material group, the source determination is not set and source list is also not maintained.
When we create PR for the material with this contract, and when we click on assign source of supply contracts used to get popped up, but recently from few days, when we click on assign source of supply we are getting an error " no source found for this item ".
Can anybody help on this.
Regards

@ Biju,
As mentioned earlier, we are not creating PR with reference to contract.
first we are creating contract with item category W (material group), without material and plant details.
we create PR with or without material with account assignment K and with the material group in the transaction ME51N, and after inputting all the fields, we click on assign source of supply, it was proposing the existing contracts with respect to material group earlier, but it is not happening for particular material group(it is working for all other material groups)
Hope it is clear.
@ Dev Patra,
we are using DIEN-Service material types and we assign that particular material group to only service material type.
we have not ticked, source list in the material master, we donot have any source list for the materials under that material group.( please check the note 457110- question number 14.)
Regards

Material price is not coming in PO print out

Hi
I am facing a problem for a cost cenetr PO material price is not coming in print preview as welll as in print out for a particular PO what can be the problem.
regards,
zafar

Solution in this link Print priview of Purchase Order

Material Description is not displaying for few records in Report

Dear Experts,
Report Material Description is not displaying for few records in Bex Report but for records it is coming and even the heading of the material Description is also not coming for this report.
Cud u plz suggest a good solution for it.
Regards,
Sai Phani.

Hi Phani,
For the text of the material in records, check if there is text maintained for that material in the master data. also try by changing the text to medium text and long text.
regarding header, you will have same heading for key and text, you may use Materail ID / Description as the heading if you want.
regards,
Rk.

AFS material-/mrp-status not active for plant.

Hello Everyone
I am facing an issue while executing the sales order
Issue :AFS material-/mrp-status not active for plant..
CAN ANY ONE RESOLVE THIS...
Regards,Rajneesh

Hi Rajneesh,
Tht prb might be the material master.
Goto Material master, select AFS MRP View and activate/ press the AFS MRP status button and save.
Reward with points if it is helpful
Kishore

An out-of-sequence check is not permitted for payroll type B

We had to do advance payments for 4 pay periods for an employee through offcycle workbench. One of the checks was wrong so we had to reverse it. It is an out of sequence reversal. Now when i try to do a correction run , it gives me an error An out-of-sequence check is not permitted for payroll type B
How can i run the correction run now. Please help
Edited by: sagarika sharma on Aug 14, 2010 6:29 AM

Check with SAP note 1425764,696067 and 1127119.
Mohan

Check-In not locked for structure element in SOLMAN_DIRECTORY

Hi,
In the solution manager, as a pre-requisite of the one of the upgrade project,
all the BPS nodes should be checked in the solution directory.
But we are not able to check in .
Getting below error message.
" Check-In not locked for structure element PD-PPD of type with object_no 0000847512 "
Message no. MAINT_PR046
Can anyone please suggest what could be the issue.

Please ensure whether both projects have the same budget profile. Other than that you need to carefully investigate how the cost was posted onto both projects in the first place. Please note in case of procurements, budget is only checked at the commitments level (search the forum as this has been discussed before).
In case this does not resolve your issue, revert back with the budget profile settings.
Regards,
Ammar

Doesn't play songs, "itunes is not configured for use with mac-formatted"??

Hi, new ipod shuffle. Seems to charge fine, all indicator lights function as expected. Everything looks fine in itunes. But it doesn't play songs. I have the most recent versions of itunes and the ipod software. Re-set, updated, and restored, nothing works. Even restored using the restore utility. Re-started computer. Checked for volume control. Won't play songs. Tried different file types. Songs play fine from itunes library and from the device's library within itunes. Tried different headphones. Hooked it up to computer speakers. Turning volume all the way up on device and speakers, heard some very faint rhythmic static, so my guess is the jack socket (or whatever you call it) is just messed up, but it seems weird that it can transfer power and data to the device but doesn't work for sound...
The only other issues that have come up is that the drive disappears in explorer once it syncs with itunes. Other people who've noticed this seem to have completely different problems so I don't think it's related.
Also, I have MacDrive on my computer. And when it starts up with the ipod plugged in, MacDrive offers the message "Itunes is not configured for use with Mac-formatted ipods." It offers to automatically reconfigure itunes so it can read mac-formatted ipods. Since I've restored the device, I don't see why formatting should be an issue so I say "no."
Should I try letting macdrive do its format thing? Should I try formatting the ipod disk on the My Computer menu? Or should I just email apple and tell them the jack's busted?
Thanks for any thoughts!

Well, I have had my iPod for about 3 years, it is a 4th generation non-video 40 GB. One day it just stopped working, and now it does not play any songs. when I turn it on it makes this odd whirring sounds that computers make when they try really hard to do something. I cannot charge it, and it is not recognized by iTunes. Also when I turn it on, I get the apple.com/ipod/support (or whatever it is) screen. Needless to say, my warranty is expired, and so I cannot do anything for it except get a new battery, or buy a new one. Is there any way to fix this problem, or anyone out there who is experiencing the same thing?
I'm having the exact same problem with my wife's iPod. However it will play about 3 seconds of a song and go onto the next song.
If there is anyone out there that can help please do!
Windows XP

V-41 tcode error :Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00

Hi All,
I am trying to create a BDC using the transaction V-41.
The first screen has fields:
ConditionType and Table, where I have to fill values ZPM1 and 800 respectively.
But as soon as I enter the tcode v-41 and say enter, the above mentioned fields are already having the values 'PR00' and ' 304'. Normally if you take an example fo t-code VA02, all fields are blank.
Then an error message is displayed:
Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00
This behaviour is not allowing me to use the BDC feature.
Please advise me on why this is happening. What are the possible solutions I can use to clear these values programmatically?
Can anything be done via customizing?
Regards,
Namita.

Dear ILHAN ,
Well the problem you are facing is having the following solution:
Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00
Message no. VK024
Diagnosis
The selected condition type does not fit in the condition table, that is the basis for the condition record. Alternatively the selected condition type is not included in the condition types that were selected on the selection screen or that are defined in the variant of the standard selection report.
Procedure
Úse F4 help to choose a valid condition type.
If this does not give you the required condition type, check in Customizing for condition types and the related access sequences.
In the condition maintenance also check Customizing for the selection report (pricing report), that you have selected in the navigation tree, using the standard condition table as a reference.
I hope this helps.
It has worked for me.
I gave it a try and what I am getting using the transaction V-41 is create Price condition (PR00) : Fast Entry.
Please award points if you find it useful.
Regards,
Rakesh

Rules are not allowed for jobs with set 'archive edited messages only' flag.

Hi,
We are on AEX 7.4 and have enabled user defined search and also setup archiving. Even though the retention period has expired but still the messages are not being
archived.
We see following issues:
1. Unable to setup archiving rule in Runtime Work Bench, we are getting following error:
Rules are not allowed for jobs with set 'archive edited messages only flag.
2. Unable to set the expiration of messages using the following link.Each time we specify the number days it shows the same number of
messages expired.
http://XXXXX:50000/MessagingSystem/job/reorgdb.jsp
3. However if we click on "remove messages" button the messages are getting deleted which tells me that the messages are not matching any
archiving rule hence are being removed.
Any pointers to the above issue are appreciated!!!
Thanks,
Rajeev

Hi,
Please check the [link|http://www.****************/Tutorials/XI/Archiving/Index.htm]
Also check this
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/402fae48-0601-0010-3088-85c46a236f50?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=147266890
Regards,
Naveen.

TS2755 this accessory is not optimal for use with this iphone keeps popping up on my phone how do i stop it?

This accessory is not optimal for use with this iphone keeps popping up on my phone how do i stop it?

Can be caused by lint, dirt, or foreign material in the dock connector port and it doesn't take much.
Can also be caused by damage to the pins in the dock connector port including moisture damage.

I am considering updating to Mountain Lion. Have checked the website Roar for compatibility with other software; some OK; some have yet to be tested. When will that testing be done?

I am considering updating to Mountain Lion. Have checked the Roar website for compatability with my existing software; some are OK, but Bridge and Picasa said to yet be tested for compatability. When will this happen?

I am considering updating to Mountain Lion. Have checked the Roar website for compatability with my existing software; some are OK, but Bridge and Picasa said to yet be tested for compatability. When will this happen?

The demand of my application is that i can not replace for loop with a while loop.because i need fixed number of iterations and as far as i know fixed iterations could be only with possible with the for loop.

the demand of my application is that i can not replace for loop with a while loop.because i need fixed number of iterations and as far as i know fixed iterations could be only with possible with the for loop.
your recommended second option that i could add true/false case.
this true/false case must be inside the for loop or outside the for loop?if this case is inside the for
loop, how can i send stop command from outer while
loop?
more over do you have any example for this please?
thanks"

You can execute a fixed number of iterations using a while loop by comparing the iteration count to the number of iterations you want and wiring the output of that comparison (e.g. Less Than or Equal To) to the continue (or stop) terminal of your while loop. Which comparison you use depends on personal preference, where you wire the desired count and the interation count, and whether you're using the while loop as Continue if True or Stop if True.
Ben gave you step-by-step instructions in response to your previous question. Look here for Ben's response.
Ben's response looks pretty good and detailed to me. It certa
inly deserved better than a 1-star rating.

InvalidKeyException: Could not initialize for signing with the given key

InvalidKeyException: Could not initialize for signing with the given key
What does this caused? And how can I make following code to work? Is it bug, or is it supposed to do so?
X509CertImpl newCert = new X509CertImpl(certInfo);
newCert.sign(caPrivateKey, SIG_ALG_NAME);

Your key is probably using a different algorithm:
Signature signature =
Signature.getInstance( SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM );
PrivateKey privKey =
( PrivateKey ) this.store.getKey( alias, pwd );
Make sure the SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM (SHA1WithRSA, SHA1WithDSA)
matches the algoright of the keystore.
your will see it when casting the private key into a concrete
key instance:
RSAPrivateKey privKey =
( RSAPrivateKey ) this.store.getKey( alias, pwd );

Why Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes

As we all know , Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes.
But i'm very confused .
Why Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes ?? what's its essential?

Creating a function based index creates a hidden virtual column (you'll see it if you query user_tab_cols) and once you index a virtual column you can no longer shrink the table:orcl> create table t1(c1 number,c2 as (c1 * 2)) segment creation immediate;
Table created.
orcl> alter table t1 enable row movement;
Table altered.
orcl>
orcl> alter table t1 shrink space;
Table altered.
orcl> create index i2 on t1(c2);
Index created.
orcl> alter table t1 shrink space;
alter table t1 shrink space
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-10631: SHRINK clause should not be specified for this object
orcl>so the issue is not with function based indexes per se, it is a level beneath that. Perhaps because the virtual column has no physical existance, when the row is moved there is no reason for Oracle to realize that an index needs updating? I haven't attempted to reverse engineer this, I would be interested to know if anyone else has.

Order as Direct material check is not coming for shoppingcart with material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for