Order reason - cost center

hi experts,
i know that you cand assign an cost center to an sales order reason. Can anyone tell me where i can make this customization?
Thank you in advance.

Goto OVF3 click on new entries, maintain sales area, order reason (E.g 102), cost center and valid from.
Now goto VA01, enter sold-to party, material and other information. Next goto header details account assignment tab, you find the cost center field
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

*Internal Order* or *Cost Center* on SD Sales Order

Hi Gurus,
please can you tell me how we can set automatically Internal Order or Cost Center on SD Sales Order (without putting it manually).
Thank you very much
Kind Regards
Andrea

Hi Andrea,
As Ambrusa told, one Z table should be created where you can maintain order reasons, sales org, sales order type and the internal order no. as combination and use the below mentioned user exit.
When user create sales order, system will default the order reasons maintained in the z table and internal order no. will be picked as user select the order reason.
Hope this will meet your requirement.
Regards
Suresh.

SD order with cost center on header still creates CO-PA document in VF02

Hi guys,
we have 2 cases in SD, where we want not postings in CO-PA (for samples to customers):
1. on SD order item level with internal order account assignment
2. on SD header level with a proper order reason which allows cost center assignment on headers (OVF3)
1. is working
2. is not working
here the details:
1. order with e.g. 2 items created, one has a special item category with internl order account assignment. Goods delivery is posting with MM account determination VAY (so with cost element) and goods issue is correct on internal order.
This item is not creating a CO-PA document, which is correct and wanted.
2. special order type in SD for samples, where a order reason allows cost center assignment on header level (cost centers on SD item level is not possible obviously). Both cases use the same billing type, and same item category. In cost center case, also goods issue is posted correctly with VAY cost element to cost center of SD order, but:
creates a CO-PA document without values, but qty, which is not wanted.
I could reset the qty with a special billing type in KE4W, but I still want to make sure somehow, that never a CO-PA document is created and I also would like to understand, why those 2 cases behave differently.
Any idea? Please no proposal with user-exit - in this case I would own billing type prefer.
br
Bjoern
keywords to find this thread later:
KE4M, co-pa, sd order integration, cost center posting from SD, item category

Hi
I would prefer KE4W as the solution... I had a similar situation earlier where in I used exit COPA0005 because I had no other choice... But because you are managing with separate bill type, KE4W is the option
br, Ajay M

Is there is a way to have a link from purchase order to cost center report.

Is there is a way to have a link from purchase order to cost center report.
I am meaning kind of:
Standard way to customized this link?
or
User exit to have this link in place
or
Any other solution
Thanks

For me it does not make any sense from going from PO to cost center report.
However, if you want to see the purchase order cost incurred with a cost center, execute KSB1 report. Within the layout, bring "Purchasing Document" field, where you can see the purchase order number in cost center line item report.

Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

Dear Expert,
I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
Please advice.
Thank you.
KH

Hi Kiran,
The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
BR, Srinivas Salpala

Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail. When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######. Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as KSB1.
I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center. Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center? Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks Christian,
We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element" checked. Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
For example:
expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250. The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000. When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000. We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000 and $250, $250 to 600000.
Thanks,
Jeff

How to change purchase order's cost center in batch

Dear all :
how to change purchase order's cost center in batch?

Dear Manish :
thanks so much for you reply.
the filed which i wanted to change it's content is cost center (KOSTL) in table EKKN.
i couldn't find it in this t-code when i select fields.

Create Purchase Order to cost center

Hi,
Will it be possible to create a purchase requisition from the MRP run which has account assignment K and default a cost center.
At the moment I need manually to update the requisition item line with 'k' and costcenter before converting to a purchase order.
br,
Anders

The purpose of MRP run is to make sure that you always have enough stock.
An order to cost center will not increase stock.
Means: MRP is not able to create requisitions for cost center consumption. If you change a requisition created by MRP to be ordered to a cost center, then the next MRP run will create a new requisition to stock.

Internal order and Cost center

hi guys
can anyone please explain me why do we have cost centers and internal orders?
If we can track cost to cost center then why do we need internal orders?
please give some detailed explanation.
thanks

when you are posting a document and if the g/l is created as a cost element then
you have to either assign a cost center, profit center, internal order etc
so when you are posting an expense and if its for that project you assign the
internal order and when the project is finished you can settle it to a cost center.
If we can assign both internal order and cost center i dont think so but not very
sure. Best way to learn these things i would recommend is try it in test system
that way you will understand better about the whole flow and it will stick in your
mind.
Regards,
Zaid

Sales Order - order reason - cost element error in PO creation

Good day Friends,
We have a third party order scenario in our group among different company codes (FI-SD). This scenario is working fine among the existing companies.
Now there is a requirement from finance department to capture the revenues at different cost centers based on the order reason selected in the sales order.
When order reason is mentioned in the sales order the system is giving error at the time of purchase order creation as u201CCreate account 123456 for 16.05.2010 as a cost element in controlling area INTu201D
Where as if the sales order is created without order reason there is no problem in purchase order creation.
Here the account 123456 cannot be created as cost element because it will stop the other existing processes in this controlling area.
Thanks

I can tell you why it's occurring and maybe give you a few suggestions on what to do. The G/L account assignment for the third party sales process is determined based on the account key/modifier assigned to the transaction and the valuation class assigned to the material. In this case, the account key/modifier is determined based on the account assignment category assigned to the purchased order (in the standard system the account assignment category is X for third party processing and the account modifier is VAX). You would find the G/L account based on the combination of the account key = GBB, account modifier and valuation class using t-code (OBYC).
Saying all that, currently that combination is finding a G/L account that is not setup as a cost element (probably your cost of goods sold account) and that's normal for these types of posting. You can only make postings to cost centers for accounts that are setup as cost elements, so currently the system will not let make a posting to a cost center.
So if you want this transaction to post to a cost center, but don't want to create a cost element for this account, then you must use a different G/L account for these postings. The simplest options would be to either change the account modifier assigned to the account assignment category or assign a different valuation class to these materials. Once you've change one of those you can now assign a different G/L account to that combination in OBYC and create that account as a cost element.
thanks,

Purchase order with cost center

I have 1 purchase order raised against cost center. for which gr, iv & payment also done but. client want to return part of the goods.
What can be the best process to do this.
Thanks,
Kiran

Hi,
Talk to your business team, what is real requirement now and also consult with FI/CO team
As payment done, you can go for creating a Return PO and then do GR with 161 movement type( if excise,do J1IS for to reverse excise and then print with J1IV) and finally go for credit memo in MIRO.
OR
Considering payment done to vendor as wrongly/ by mistake,so 1st check accounting document number for which vendor (with account number) in t.code:FBL1N & then reverse it with t.code: F-02 and finally clear it with t.code: F-44.Reverse all GR and MIRO document.
Regards,
Biju K

Asset Postings on Internal Order or Cost Center

Hello All,
I created the Asset B/S Recon A/C as Cost Element 90 to have postings on cost Objects.
In ACSET - I customized both IO and CC to have APC postings and Depreciation postings.
But when I post an acquisition, Iam not seeing either an IO or CC in the Document.
Am I missing some thing.
Thanks.

Hi Venkat,
Make the fields Cost center and CO/PP Order as optional in field status group that you will assign in GL Master Record.
I think for reconciliation account, we generally assign G067 field status group. Go to T'code OBCD and double click on G067 - Reconciliation accounts - Additional account assignments and make those fields optional.
Reward Points if useful,
~Rajesh

Post to internal order and cost center

we want system show error message if user post to expense account 5****** with cost center and internal order together, i.e.
we can only post to cost center or internal order, but can't be both, can it be done by co validation? or do we use user exit to do it? which user exit? thanks

Hi,
is the internal order a real order or a statictical one?
Regards,
Greta

Disable or Validate Order or Cost center in MIGO for Mvmt type 201/261

Hi All,
I want to disable or validate 'Order' field in MIGO for the goods issue if the movement type is 201.
I want to disable or validate 'Cost Center' field in MIGO for the goods issue if the movement type is 261.
User do not want 'Order' field in MIGO for movement type 201 & User do not want 'Cost centre' field in MIGO for movement type 261.
Thanks
Pabi

Hi
go to OMJJ
here select move type and then give move type 201
now select 201 and click on Field selection (ENJOY)
now just remove the order field from here
similarly do for 261 movememt
this will affect to whole client

Material cost charge to Production Order from Cost Center / Work Center.

In Production Order Environment, is it possible that goods are issued from Storage location to Cost Center / Work Center, and in turn charged to Production Orders.
Scenario. Transformer Manufacturing.
Production Order size : 100 Units
Steel (Kgs) per Transformer : 3 Kgs
Total Steel required for Production Order: 300 Kgs (100x3)
In the process of manufacturing of a Transformer Steel or Core winding is the first process step.
Even though the Steel required for above said Production Order is 300 Kgs, the minimum issuable lot size from stores is 2000 Kgs.
Is it possible in SAP ECC 6.0 that the Steel of 2000 Kgs is issued to a Cost Center / Work Center, and later charged to production order based on actual Consumption in the said Cost Center / Work Center.
Regards, Replies and Sugestions shall be appreciated
Madhu

Thank you for the reply,
However, the scenario that i had in mind was a bit different from what you had conceptualized.
Scenario - These transformers are basically for loading on to Inverters & UPS, The max weight of the transformer range from 15-30 Kgs. and they dont have an external casing of steel as seen on Indian Electricity Board transformers. Multiple production orders are processed at a single time in the Plant as per Customer specifications.
The general process followed for manufacture is as follows:
1. Core Winding u2013 This process takes place in the core winding department. Steel reels are loaded on to Winders and individual cores of approx 5 u2013 30 Cm Diameter are produced. (Multiple reels of Steel are stacked one on top of the other onto a pallet.) Usually issue of steel from stores happens pallet wise. The pallets of steel generally weigh in excess of 2 tons.
In the present situation (Non SAP Environment) the entire pallet of Steel is issued to the Core winding department and later the Output is charged to multiple Production Orders, based on the records of the Core winding dept. Since in general the steel content in the FG ranges from 3- 25 Kgs multiple Production Orders can be catered to from one Pallet of Steel.
2. Core Laithing. The wound cores are laithed so as to make the sides smooth.
3. Core Annealing u2013 Heat treatment process.
4. Core Insulation. u2013 Insulation of the annealed cores with insulating material.
5. Primary Winding. u2013 Copper is wound as per the BOM Specification. The issue like that of Steel also arises in the Copper winding process. Here also the Cooper comes in Spools which far exceed the requirement for any Production Order. The minimum issueable lot for Copper from Stores is one Spool. The current practice followed is that the Cooper is taken in the name of the Copper winding department and later charged to individual Production Orders.
6. Primary Soldering.
7. Mid Insulation.
8. Secondary Winding
9. Secondary Soldering
10. Shielding
11. Final Insulation u2013 Same issue with insulation too, since the insulating material comes in rolls.
12. Testing.
13. Potting & Drilling - Process of pouring a chemical compound in the center of the transformer, which helps the transformer to later be loaded on an Inverter. The same issue with like of Steel, Copper & Insulation arises here too, since the chemical compound comes in big containers capable of meeting production requirement for a week.
14. Packing
15. Transfer to FG Inventory.
One of the suggestions was to issue the entire 2000 Kgs to the Production Order and then return 1700 kgs after completion of the Production Order based on actual usage. However, in my opinion this option might not be practicable because, assuming that I get another / multiple Production orders in between the issue of 2000 Kgs and return of 1700 Kgs, issue to the new Production order will not be possible if the stock in stores was only 2000 Kgs initially. In case assuming that the material is available in stores for the next production order, the situation could worsen in case of receipt of multiple production orders.
Hope, I have explained the scenario & issue being faced.
Regards
Madhu

Order reason - cost center

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for