Order Settlement document -

Hello,
    I run CO88- settlement for orders, the accounting entries were as follows:
Cost price difference acct ( PRD) -   credit
SF DELIVERIED TO INVENTORY  - debit.
for one of the orders it did a reverse posting.
Please explain what this means exactly.
Both of these are P&L accounts.

Let's take a case of a production order to make 100 units of material FIN001, whose standard cost is $ 33 each.
The total cost of goods and labor issued to the order is $ 3,400. When the 100 units are ready they are taken out of the order by way of goods receipt. At this time the order gets a credit of 3,300 (being 100 times $33). When you take a look at the balance of the order, the debit was $ 3,400 and credit $ 3,300. This leaves a $ 100 which is in excess of target cost of $ 3,300. This will be debited to Variance account with an offset to another P& L account (may be named settled variance account, in your case it seems to be SF delivered to inventory)
If the cost of goods and labor issued to the order was only $,3,200, this would leave a favourable variance account, leading to a credit to the variance account.

Similar Messages

  • Material Code for Process Order Settlement document

    HI,
    When Process Order to a material having Standard Price is settled, the following entry is passed.
    Inventory Change A/C Debit/Credit
    Price difference A/C Debit/Credit
    It is being obeserved that in the line item of FI document for the Inventory Change the material code appears in the Price difference line items whereas for Inventory Change line item the material code does not appear.
    I want to know why this happens ?
    Regards
    Partha

    Using warehouse management /WM) :
    - Create a control cycle for the component, using LPK1. Here you define if the supply will be specific for the order (when weighing takes place in the warehouse) or for released orders (normallu full packages of components and weighing is done at plant level). Reference to a supply area.
    - The resource used in the operation has a reference to the supply area.
    - Components have material master views in WM for the selected storage type
    Then, when releasing the orders run LP10 - LP12 to generate the Transfer requirements for the raw materials. These TR will be converted to Transfer Orders and Confirmed, so the stock will be moved to your supply area.
    Using Inventory Management, none of the above is required. You can use MF60 to move materials from General Storage Location to Shop Floor SLoc.
    Regards

  • Change Settlement document Type on PM orders

    HI guys,
    I need change settlement document type on PM orders.
    I've already created new document type and a new range number on [OBA7], and I've already assigned this new document type to my settlement profile [.
    But system still used the Document type 'SA'.
    Any ideia for solving this problem.
    Thks,
    Helena

    HI,
    If you have newGL document splitting active and have not fixed it yet, then check this thread for the solution..
    Change document type in Maintenance orders settlement (KO88)
    Hope this helps.

  • Error in Settlement Document - Sales order

    Hi,
    In MTO Scenario, for Bulk Sales order we have done partial Delivery and billing to customer but for COPA value appeared for line item wrong value,
    i.e.
    1. Sales order item # 100 Quantity &  Material (H1PA16006ISNKB0006) 5 MT
    2. Sales order Item # 200 Quantity & Material  (H1PA09006ISNKB0006) 1 MT
    for the above Item no 100 Partial Delivered 6th Sept' 2010,  4 MT,Settlement completed through VA88
    again the above Item no 100 partial Delivered 10th Sept' 2010 1 MT Settlement completed through VA88
    Second Sales order Item no 200 Fully Delivered 8th Sept 2010 1 MT  Settlement completed through VA88
    (Totally 3 settlement document in period 006.2010)
    Due to some reason i have done Settlement reverse but in System taken
    Sales order no 100 for 1 MT not consider 4 MT with value
    and second sale order no 200 1 MT fully.
    could u tel me what was wrong in my document and how can rectified these documents...during settlement
    Thanks & Regards
    Vinu,

    Hi Ajay,
    it is one of the requirement from our client.
    I have post this issue earlier and my client was accepted to do partial sales order settlement on daily basis, now three copa document was wrong value so i have reverse the document but system taken consider latest document,
    is their any chance to change COPA Settlement document ( Record type C)...i need add one characteristics i.e. material Group in the COPA Document
    Thanks & Regards.
    Vinu

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Error while transferring Forwarding settlement document to ERP Billing

    Hi Experts,
    My forwarding settlement document is consistent.
    All the basic customizing in SAP ERP, TM has been completed as follows, but getting error while transferring forwarding settlement document to ERP billing (Ref. 1st screenshot).
    I am using SAVE AND TRANSFER button to send the document to ERP, also same error is displaying while using PREVIEW INVOICE button (Ref.2nd screenshot)
    Please suggest if I missed anything to send forwarding settlement document to ERP.
    Customizing settings for transferring Forwarding settlement document to SAP ERP.
    1. In SD Billing all condition types has been maintained, pricing procedure determination configured.
    2. In SAP ERP SD condition types mapped to TM charge types using following path.
    Integration with other sap components - Transportation management - Invoice integration - Billing - Definition for transportation charge elements - Define charge types.
    3. Assignment of charge types in ERPSD
    4. Define charge category, subcategory codes
    5. Mapped ERP SD, TM sales organization with logical TM system, sales area, Order type, Billing type, Pricing procedure
    6. Output types determination configured for ERP Billing in SD

    Dear Serhat,
    I don't think this is an RFC problem or an error. But you wrote:
    When I checked why its value is 'X', I saw that if the RFC destination and the current system are the same, then lv_no_commit = 'X', (means if the R3 and the GTS are in the same server, same client.)
    It is impossible to have GTS and R/3 on the same system and same client. At least the client should be different. So try to check why the call is performed like that.
    Balazs

  • CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

    Dear Experts,
    Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
    1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
    2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
    3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
    4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
    5. We  are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
    6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
    I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
    1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost.  Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
    2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
    Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
    Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA  (at the time of Billing)
    Regards,
    vgl
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

    Hi
    1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
    In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
    2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
    1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
    2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
    3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
    Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
    regards
    Ajay M

  • Cut off period for sales order settlement

    Dear Expert,
    Client using SAP from last  13 years. Client implemented MTO with valuated stock and activated the COPA.
    Now we are re implementing the COPA. since go live(from last 13 years ) they are not doing any sales order settlements and not using COPA.
    In sales order RA key(Requirement class) is assigned and Settlement type is 'FUL'.
    Now client has decided to use COPA and going to live with new structure on September 1 2014.
    I have do the below changes
    1. Removed RA key(Not required as per business requirement)
    2. Changed settlement type from 'FUL' to PER., here i am having some questions. Client don't want to settle previous orders(before September). as per business requirement they will use one sales order for long time (3 to 4 months). after going live client will settle the sales orders at that time system will consider all sales orders. How can i avoid selection of all sales orders. i want to settle only sales orders having transactions during one month (September)
    To avoid this problem now its self i am moving this changes to Production client (RA key removed and Settlement type change), still i am not confident i will get as expected, because at the time of Sales order settlement system will consider all old sales orders.
    Can anyone please suggest beat way to handle this issue...
    Thanks.
    Chandrasekhar

    Hi Chandra,
    Check the Below SAP Note
    174815
    - Selection parameter in VA88 or RKO7VA88
    Symptom
    During the settlement of sales and distribution documents with Transaction
    VA88 or report RKO7VA88, you can only select according to the SD document number
    or the sales organization.
    For example, you cannot select by plant or SD
    document type.
    Other Terms
    VA88
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The problem occurs due to a previous program design.
    Solution
    With the attached advance correction, you can also select according to the
    plant or the SD document type in report RKO7VA88.The previous restrictions apply
    for Transaction VA88.
    To correct the error in advance, proceed as
    follows:
    1. First implement Notes 174502 and 182735.
    2. Using Transaction SE11, add field VBAUART (data element AUART) to
    structures LKO74 and RKASS. Activate the structures.
    3. Add the following parameter to the interface of function module
    SD_DOCUMENT_OBJNR_GET (Transaction SE37):
    a) Import parameter:I_WERKS (reference field VBAP-WERKS) and I_AUART
    (reference field VBAK-AUART). Both parameters should be indicated as
    'optional'.
    b) Export parameter:E_WERKS (reference field VBAP-WERKS) and E_AUART
    (reference field VBAK-AUART).
    4. Implement the source code corrections.
    5. Maintain the text elements for report RKO7VA88 (Transaction SE38, Goto
    --> Text elements --> Selection texts):Text 'Sales document type' for
    VBAUART and 'Plant' for WERKS.
    Afterwards, also implement Note 210011.
    Regards
    Srinu

  • How to see Process Order settlement details?

    Dear Experts,
    How do I view the accounting/controlling details after a Process Order Settlemnet is carried out?
    In OBYC, what is the posting transaction for Order Settlement through which I can see the valuation class & G/L account assigned?

    Hi,
    IF you wish to check the Accouting documents or settlement documents , you can check throw CO88 select Previous Settlement to check the detaiils or else you can go to KOB1 Order line item display for checking all the line items.
    in KOB1 T.code you can check all the documents including Material and other by double clicking the items.
    Hope this will Help you ..
    Thanks
    Goutam

  • Internal Order Settled to AUC reverse process

    Dear Gurus,
    I had a hard time to think how to do the processes over and over again.
    The current process is:
    Every month the internal order (investment and real order)  will collect the expense on AUC and settle to the AUC.
    At the end of year, the AUC will be settled to Fix Asset by internal order settlement rules.
    Now what if the settled expense was not correct. For example, in 2009, I created the IO and settled the IO to AUC in several months. But in 2010, I found the expense in IO shall not be settled to AUC, the expense was only the overheads. ( The AUC was not settled to Fix Assets). Just like I wanna reverse the settlement in 2009.
    So it would be like this in a flow chart.
    IO-> AUC->FX
    Now I need to do this:
    AUC->IO->GL
    For IO->GL, I have figured out that I can change the settlement rule profile and make the GL account allowed.
    But for AUC->IO , I have no idea and almost burn my brain on it.
    Could you please help to throw light ?
    Emma

    Hi,
    I tried 2 write offs, please help to see whether I am doing right. Thank you!
    I tried to reverse the document but it was not allowed.
    I am thinking to post a document like the following:
    1. Doc in 2009
    50 8910000000 settlement AUC             2,964,800.00-        Order:C1BIC83002
    70 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00
    2. What I want to post:
    40 8910000000 settlement AUC         2,964,800.00      C1BIC83002
    75 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00-
    But it gave me an error when I enter the asset number.
    Asset is investment measure, transaction type not allowed
    Message no. AK005
    Diagnosis
    Asset   that is to be posted is an investment measure. You are not allowed to post transactions that affect acquisition value using the current transaction.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and transaction type 160.
    I am not sure which transaction type is correct.
    Emma.

  • Table to view the CO settlement document (not tcode)

    What is the table to view the CO settlement document.I donot need transaction code..only table pls.

    Hi,
    Please check the following tables.
    AUAA Settlement Document: Receiver Seg
    AUAB Settlement Document: Distribution
    AUAI  Settlement Rules per Depreciation
    AUAK Document Header for Settlement   
    AUAV Document Segment: Transactions
    COBRA Settlement Rule for Order Settlem
    I hope this will solve your purpose
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • Order settlement - OKG8

    Hi
    We have to do internal order settlement for 6 months, can i do the collective settlement in OKG8, if so can somebody help me to create the variant why are we using variant what values do we need to enter, is each variant for each order?
    Thank you
    Edited by: Nivi ram on May 5, 2008 8:14 PM

    I have done the settlement for two orders for the current period but I could not see the accounting document details as we can see in KO88 in detailed information, i can see only the information icon
    Thank you.
    Edited by: Nivi ram on May 5, 2008 9:12 PM

  • Capital Invetsment order settlement

    Hello,
    I have created Capital investment order, when you create the order, it will automaticlly creates the AUC,  I have posted transactions like PO creation and GR,  using this oder. The AUC which is created during order creation do not have any values after the above transactions posted by using order. How will these cost will flow into the AUC and settlement from AUC to actaul asset.
    i was trying to define the AUC in the order settlement rule but it is not getting saved, i am getting error message stating  "you cannot post to AUC (Investment support measure).
    Please tell me settlement process for Capital investment order, is there any document avaialable apart from help.sap.com? if yes, please share with me.
    email ID. [Email removed by moderator]
    thanks,
    radhakrishna
    Message was edited by:
            Mario Herger

    Hi Radhakrishna,
    Which order are you talking about here? Is it Plant Maintenance(PM) Order or Network Order?
    If it is PM order, then it is likely to be OPEX and therefore, settlement would have to take place via transaction code <b>KO8G</b>.
    If it is Network order, this is likely to be CAPEX and settlement would have to take place via transaction code <b>CJ8G</b>.
    For the cost to flow into AUC, You would have to create assets with transaction code <b>AS01</b> with the asset class AUC. Once the Asset is created, you would then use this asset number for the settlement rule that would be maintained on the WBS element which contain the order.
    When the AUC asset is completed, you would then have to create a Fixed Asset and carry out Asset Transfer using transaction code <b>ABUMN</b>. This is how settlement is done from AUC to Actual Asset.
    I hope the above helps.
    Do not forget to award the points please.
    Regards,
    Jacob

  • Service Order Settlement - assigned to PSG

    Hi,
    I need a help regarding Service Order Settlement assigned to Profitability Segment.
    Currently, in our system every item of SD Invoice posts revenues and COGS to profitability segment (PSG).
    Main characteristic of PSG are: Customer, Product, Division, Profit Center.
    We have implemented CS module using in Car maintenance service.
    And now in CS module it is not possible to get PA document automatically after an invoice posting so we have to settle Service Order to PSG.
    But Settlement rule for Service Order is not on item level (per every material-product separately).
    We wants to have the same rules (per Product char.) for Service Order as we had so far in SD.
    Is it possible to customize Settlement rule of Service Order on item level?
    For instance according to an Invoice items from document flow:
    Thanks,
    Zoran

    Resolved

Maybe you are looking for