Order Settlement Problems

Hello Experts
I had settled many Production and Process Orders for July Month End but I did it directly without running the variance calculations (KKS1). I found that many orders did not get settled in this process. Did this happen because I did not run the variance calculations?
Now, when I settle those unsettled orders individually they are getting settled but in the August month and not in the July Month.
Is Variance calculation a must before settling the Orders?
Prashant

Production orders settlement depends on their status
Unfinished orders go to WIP
Finished orders (TECO, DLV) settle to varriance accounts
If you didn't do the variance calculation ther was nothing to settle - so it is a must
I don't understand how your individual settlements finishe in August as you have to specify the month of settlement
cherrs
matej

Similar Messages

Sales order settlement Problem with Internal Order

HI Dear Friends,
How are you, I am fine.
We have 1 Process here Related with SD & FI/CO
for 1 process we have treat as a small Project,
the process is we have make 1st Contract and create Internal order and assign Internal order to Contract
then Create Sales Release Order and assing Internal Order in Settlement Rule in Sales order.
then we create billing ref to Contract and then we did PGI.
1) at billing time the Internal Order is Updatting
2) at PGI time internal Order is not updating - what is the right process - the internal; Order will be updating or not
then we have to do Sales order Settlement thtough Trasaction code VA88
what will happned at this level pleas be advicsed becos when i do this it is giving messges not is toi be settled.
Friends I did all exercise complete except Settlement trough T-Code VA88.
When I am going to do this settlement VA88 it is giving messages there is nothing to be settle.
What I have to do please be advised.
I did all these activities:
1)     Create sales Contract
2)     Create Internal Order
3)     Assign Internal Order to sales Contract
4)     Crate Release Sales Order
5)     Assign Internal Order to Release Sales Order
6)     Delivery & PGI
7)     Billing         (at billing time the internal Order should be Updates (pls advise it should be or not)
8)     Last is Settlement VA88 u2013 this time it is giving Error.
When I settle the Sales order to internal order what will happens. Which value will update.
Please reply me frds,
Thanks,
Srem.

hello Lakshmipathi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I tried to change the requierement class in order to put one with special stock E as you explained, but i still have my weird schedule line. When i put the item in the order it is 0 stock for today, but stock find in 12 days either if there is stock or no(unrestricted stock i mean).
If i change the RDD in more than 12 days the stock is available for the date requested.
If you have an idea of what could be wrong because on my case i want the schedule line to be at 0 while the sales order reservation has not been processed (via MB1B/412/E) and once the stock movement is done the schedule line has to be find.
I dont know if im clear enought..
To be more clear, i want the schedule line based on the "sales order stock" and not on the "unrestricted stock".
thanks for your help!
Guillaume

ORDER SETTLEMENT PROBLEM

Hi all,
i settled a production order let say 'X' through t code ko88 (this order is created by t code iw31) now again when i am tring to settle the same order throgh t code it is allowing me to settle though it is already settled 100% in production server
But in development server it is giving me message that 'Order is settled'.
Please tell me why system is allowing me in production to settle the same order?
waiting for response

Hi Sandeep,
When you said that the Order was created using the t code IW31, I understand that it is a Maintenance Order. Maintenance Orders are settled collectively using t code KO8G. Make sure that when you are saying, the Order was settled when you exectued CO88, what is the balance on that Order? was it Zero? I doubt that.
I feel, when you executed CO88, that Maintenance Order might not got Settled. So, when you are trying to settle using KO88 (single order processing), it is settling.
Check once again and revert back...
Srikanth Munnaluri

WIP Credit Balance - Internal Capital Order Settlement Problem - KO88

Hi Experts,
I am new to SAP and currently undergoing my first implementation. We are trying to settle as many internal capital orders before conversion, but since I am new I am learning the AUC process slowly.
I am trying to settle assets to a capital work order and receiving the [maintain the settlement rule of the sender]. How can I fix this? If you can provide explanation as to the process it would be greatly appreciated.

hello,
Check your settlement rule? there must be a period maintained and this does not follow within that period
extend the period of settlement rule either greater than validity period of settlement rule.
Thanks
Hrusikesh

Problem in Production Order settlement.

Hi.
My production order have the status DLV,when i go to cost balance it shows some cost balance as negative,in overhead calculation,how to select period? there is no period in F4.When i put 1 and execute the overhead it show no order debit.
When i execute the order settlement in KO88 a message comes showing that "There are no accured amounts,settlement is not possible.".I can not activate a deletion flag on the order also.
Please help.
Thanks.
Rishi

HI Rishi,
Can you elaborate your question more clearly..
Regard,s
Ramesh.

KO8G open work order settlement

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep
Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

Hey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep

Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Ashok,
Thanks for the reply.
We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
Thanks
Pradeep

Error while doing production order settlement

Hi frds,
When I am doing the production order settlement, I am getting the following error
" There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
The status of the order is TECO CNF DLV PRC BASC BCRQ GMPS MANC.
Rajnish

Rajnish,
Please check if there is cost balance for the order, to me it looks like the order is already settled. In the order display mode (CO03) menu bar Goto->Costs->Balance.
If balance exists then the problem may be related to the settlement period used in the Intial screen of transaction KO88. Please check the cost incured period and use the same period as settlement period.
Regards,
Prasobh

Cut off period for sales order settlement

Dear Expert,
Client using SAP from last 13 years. Client implemented MTO with valuated stock and activated the COPA.
Now we are re implementing the COPA. since go live(from last 13 years ) they are not doing any sales order settlements and not using COPA.
In sales order RA key(Requirement class) is assigned and Settlement type is 'FUL'.
Now client has decided to use COPA and going to live with new structure on September 1 2014.
I have do the below changes
1. Removed RA key(Not required as per business requirement)
2. Changed settlement type from 'FUL' to PER., here i am having some questions. Client don't want to settle previous orders(before September). as per business requirement they will use one sales order for long time (3 to 4 months). after going live client will settle the sales orders at that time system will consider all sales orders. How can i avoid selection of all sales orders. i want to settle only sales orders having transactions during one month (September)
To avoid this problem now its self i am moving this changes to Production client (RA key removed and Settlement type change), still i am not confident i will get as expected, because at the time of Sales order settlement system will consider all old sales orders.
Can anyone please suggest beat way to handle this issue...
Thanks.
Chandrasekhar

Hi Chandra,
Check the Below SAP Note
174815
- Selection parameter in VA88 or RKO7VA88
Symptom
During the settlement of sales and distribution documents with Transaction
VA88 or report RKO7VA88, you can only select according to the SD document number
or the sales organization.
For example, you cannot select by plant or SD
document type.
Other Terms
VA88
Reason and Prerequisites
The problem occurs due to a previous program design.
Solution
With the attached advance correction, you can also select according to the
plant or the SD document type in report RKO7VA88.The previous restrictions apply
for Transaction VA88.
To correct the error in advance, proceed as
follows:
1. First implement Notes 174502 and 182735.
2. Using Transaction SE11, add field VBAUART (data element AUART) to
structures LKO74 and RKASS. Activate the structures.
3. Add the following parameter to the interface of function module
SD_DOCUMENT_OBJNR_GET (Transaction SE37):
a) Import parameter:I_WERKS (reference field VBAP-WERKS) and I_AUART
(reference field VBAK-AUART). Both parameters should be indicated as
'optional'.
b) Export parameter:E_WERKS (reference field VBAP-WERKS) and E_AUART
(reference field VBAK-AUART).
4. Implement the source code corrections.
5. Maintain the text elements for report RKO7VA88 (Transaction SE38, Goto
--> Text elements --> Selection texts):Text 'Sales document type' for
VBAUART and 'Plant' for WERKS.
Afterwards, also implement Note 210011.
Regards
Srinu

Internal order settlement to G/L account

Dear All,
User has created one internal order 650002012 and the settlement profile is created settle to G/L account S882000000. this is a cost element category "1" (Loss on contract cancellation & co).
In the internal order The Responsible cost center is DA01D89998 (Validation & Eng Admin-St) the profit center for this "DA01".
In the internal order the Requesting cost center is DA26ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Deltron), the profit center is "DA26"
in the settlement profile when i double click on the settlement rule, he has assigned the Cost center DA01ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Ko) and the profit center is "DA01".
But when he execute the T.C "KO8G" the system is showing the error is " G/L account requires an assignement to CO object".
1. The receiver G/L account has created as a cost element. is this correct?
2. In the allocation structure do we have to select the "By cost element check box" or do we have to give the secondary cost element in the settlement cost element field.
Please give the sugessions to solve this problem.
Thanks and regards,
Rao.

It sounds like you are a little confused on how internal order settlement works. If you want the internal order to settle to a G/L account then you must enter the G/L account number in the settlement rule in the internal order. To do this, click on the settlement rule button in the order, select category G/L and enter the G/L account number. In order for you to be able to select G/L as a settlement object the settlement profile you've assigned to the order must allow this. Check the settlement profile and make sure that G/L account is listed as settlement optional or settlement required. Also check the allocation structure that is attached to the settlement profile. In the allocation structure you must have an entry under the settlement cost element for receiver category G/L. Here you should specify a cost element of type 22 as the settlement cost element.
When you make those settings you will be able to specify the receiving G/L account in the internal order. The system will then credit the internal order for the settlment amount with the credit posted on the category 22 cost element specified in the allocation structure. The debit will appear on the G/L account you specified in the internal order's settlement rule. Normally, the receiving G/L account would not be setup as a cost element. if you do set it up as a cost element you will need to use an automatic account assignment setting (OKB9) to specify the cost object that it will post to.
thanks,

Statistic condition values not updated during Sales order Settlement

Hi,
In our client we have different Price condition types for based on scenario wise. Ex: Domestic Sales (ZPR1) and Export Sales ZPR2. I have maintained separately value fields for each price condition types.
We are booking some financial charges, and interest on working capital etc., this cost we need to transfer to COPA each Material wise based on sales revenue.
For this purpose we have created one COPA Assessment Cycle. Tracing factor is Sales Revenue and receiver is Materials.
In COPA Assessment cycle we can give only one base means ZPR1 related value field or ZPR2 related value field.
For this reason we have created one new statistic condition type, what is amount there in ZPR1 that amount will updated automatically in statistic condition place and so that we can give once one trance factor in COPA Assessment Cycle. We have assign this statistic condition all pricing procedure
Now my problem is in MTS scenario statistic condition values updated correctly. But in MTO scenario sales order settlement time statistic condition values not updated.
So is it possible update during sales order settlement time statistic condition values.
Please give me suggestion.
Regards,
Thiru

Hi Ajay Sir,
As you said is correct.
But in our client we have around 9 Plants and each plant manufacturing product are different. Client Requirement is in COPA Report they need see each product wise sales revenue. In this way we mapped product wise value field. System already mapped one guy in this way earlier. Now I am doing some changes for relevant to month end activities.
Some financial changes transfer to COPA each plant wise on Material. Here sender is cost center and receiver is Material. Base is Sales Revenue.
Please suggest me is there any alternative.
Regards,
Thirumalesh .

Error during Process order settlement

Hi Gurus,
i am facing problem during the process order settlement. an error is occured is as follows: Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
actually this V0 tax code is assing to the ZTAXIN procedure & which is also assign to country. i couldn't get why it ask tax code during the settlement.
In Process order Itemization i find the 2 GL ( Element) in which there is one consumption GL & second is COFG sold GL. from GL Master i remove both GL Tax category & also remove the click from posting without tax allowed. till i am facing this problem?
Please help me to overcome this issue.
Point will be rewarded if question solved.
Than'x
Dhananjay R

hi gopan,
Than'x for attention on my question. till my problem is not solved. during the process order why it hit the tax code? would u please guide me how to find the tax code assignment which hit during the process order settlement?
i have check all the Tax related setting till this issue not solved. ( Check calculation procedure (OBYG), Tax code assignment (FTXP), also check the Tax Account Integration (OB40).
also i remove tax related assignment from the GL master related to specific gl which are display in component structure.
pls help me to solve this issue..
Than'x
Dhananjay

Process order settlement for materialwith 2 valuation types

Hi ,
In chemical mfg scenario there is co product which has 2 valuation types.
The cost of mfg to be split i nratio of 60 :40 . But this co product has 2 valaution types and hence there is problem in order settlement .In the settement rule there is no option for this.
Can i map this in SAP ?
Regards
ShankarR

Hello experts,
Is there any solution to this, kindly advise .
Regards
ShankarR

Maintenance Order Settlement

Hi SAP gurus.
I have one Maintenance Order PM01, with Actual Costs. Now I want to settle this cost to the cost collecter.
Here is the problem. In SPRO I have defined a settlement rule where the default object type is a Cost Center.
My plant has a lot of equipments, and some of them have cost-centers, and another ones have internal orders.
When I try to settle the PM01 order to one equipment that has an internal order, the system returns an error, because of the SPRO definition.
Is it possible to ask the system to search in equipment data master the cost colecter? For exemple, if in the master data is Cost Center, then the order settle that a cost center, if in master data we have one internal order, the PM01 order settle to that internal order.
Thanks in advance.

hi
since you have maintained the CTR as your settlement receiver ,if the equipment does not have cost center then your settlement rule is not created automatically which is the main cause for error during settlement
for avoiding the same you can make the settlement rule mandatory for release in IMG hence user will try to maintain the settlement receiver when releasing the order .you can proceed with settlement.
Or check customer exit COOM0003 Customer function for automatic creation of settlement rules where with the help of technical people can fulfill your requirement.
regards
thyagarajan

Maintain internal order settlement rule using LSMW

HI ALL
I want to do mass maintenance of internal order settlement rule. Settlement category is PSG.
But when I use LSMW to do KO02, I only can input one settlement receriver, the first line will be overwritten by the second line.
I also see BAPI INTERNAL_ORDER_CREATE,but cannot find PSG as a settlement category.
Does anyone know how to do this?
THX
Deelia

Hi Lian
When you do recording, enter two settlement rules..
Then, before pressing the "DEFAULT ALL" button, change the Field names for the 2nd settlement rule
The problem you described happens because the field names for both settlement rules are same.. Hence, it gets overwritten
Assume that field name for Order is AUFNR... You can change the field name in recording to ZAUFNR for one of the fields
See the screen shot, wherein I changed the name of the recorded field to _01, _15 and _70
Br. Ajay M

Order Settlement Problems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for