Org unit is not getting defaulted for the selected position in infotype0001

Org unit is not getting defaulted for the selected position in infotype 0001 during the hiring action.
In OM Org. units and positions have been created.
The Org. unit to Position relationship is also created.
But inspite of this, In infotype 0001, the after selecting a position, the Org unit is still getting defaulted to "00000000" instead of the Org. unit Id to which the position belongs. (Please note: At the time of selecting the position, I do structure search and the position is shown under the correct Or. unit)
Have I missed any step?

Have u run the RHINTE programmes properly ?
are u able to save the record?
As some times it may be display probolem, if u r able to save the record then check the relationship in pp10/po13.
and U have not answered what Mr. Valeri is asking about your Implementation/support because these type we come accress if data is not uploaded properly.
Regards
vinmax

Similar Messages

Excise rate and value is not getting defaulted from the purchase order

Hi all,
While capturing excise invoice , the excise rate and value is not getting defaulted from the purchase order and in Excise Item Tab BED,AED,ECS is Zero at both header as well as item level for only one material in STO process and if we are doing same process taking other material all things are coming perfectly and We are maintaining condition with respect to vendor,plant and material combination.Any input related to this will be helpfull and rewarded.
Regards
Vishal

Hi,
Follow STO Process for this;
1.Create a vendor for the company code of receiving plant, using account group: 0007 using T-Code XK01.
2. Assign this vendor to Delivering plant
Go to XK02 >Purchasing view>Extras>Add. Purchasing data>Plant
3. Create internal customer with the sales area of the vendor. Go To XD01
4. In pricing procedure determination relevant to STO, assign document Pricing Procedure and customer pricing procedure appropriate for STO to get the pricing in the invoice.
5. Maintain condition records for the relevant pricing condition.
6. Some more setting for STO: Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > define shipping data for plants > Go to Receiving plant >assign customer here & Supplying SA (for billing) to Receiving plant here
7. Go to MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > define shipping data for plants > Go to Supplying plant and assign the sales area of receiving plant.
8. Go to MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > assign delivery Type & Checking rule
Assign the delivery type to document type. In this case, Delivery type NLCC is assigned to Document type NB
9. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > Assign document Type, One step Procedure, Under delivery tolerance
Assign the document type NB to supplying plant and receiving plant
10. After all settings, Create the STO using T-Code: ME21N and maintain pricing conditions of freight and Save.
11. In supplying plant Maintain condition record in sales using VK11 the same will flow in receiving plant when referring the OBD no during MIGO.
10. Create Delivery: VL10G
12. Picking, PGI: VL02N
13. Billing: VF01
Save the document and its done
14. J1IIN - Outgoing Excise Invoice
15. MIGO - Goods Receipt against outbound Delivery
16. J1IEX - Capture & Post Excise Invoice
Rgs

I have a message: "Could not get session for the OEM Repository."

Dear Sir,
I browsed reports that has been published in OEM. But I received an error:
"Could not get session for the OEM Repository. Check to ensure that the OEM Repository is up."
What can I do?
Thank a lot

You will need to go into your Files and locate the song. By default, iTunes saves songs in the iTunes Media Folder which can be found in the following locations:
Mac OS X: /Users/username/Music
Windows XP: \Documents and Settings\username\My Documents\My Music\
Windows Vista: \Users\username\Music\iTunes
Windows 7 and Windows 8: \Users\username\My Music\iTunes
If you locate your song file, when you try to play it in iTunes, you will be given an option to locate. Navigate to the file in the pop up window and iTunes will re-path the file location.
Most people encounter this issue when moving to a new computer or if you have your music saved on an external drive or folder that you have since moved or removed. The imperative part is finding the song so you can re-map it.

AM 7.1 CDSSO Could not get agent for the realm

Hi,
We are trying to configure the Cookie highjacking fix in AM 7.1 and apache agent 2.2. When we try to go the agent, the browser gets redirected to the Access Manager. After authentication, I get the error message on the browser "resource access denied".
On the AM side, I get following error in amCDC file:
04/19/2007 06:19:19:919 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet Initializing...
04/19/2007 06:19:19:922 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet init params. Restricted Token Enabled: false Auth URL Cookie Name: sunIdentityServerAuthNServer Auth URL Cookie Domain:Deployment Descriptor: /amserver
04/19/2007 06:19:19:925 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: Query String received: goto=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fprintenv%3FsunwMethod%3DGET&RequestID=15432&MajorVersion=1&MinorVersion=0&ProviderID=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%3A80%2Famagent&IssueInstant=2007-04-19T18%3A19%3A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:19:934 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
SSOException caught: com.iplanet.sso.SSOException: Invalid session ID.
04/19/2007 06:19:20:430 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
Forwarding for authentication to: /UI/Login?goto=%2Famserver%2Fcdcservlet%3FTARGET%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Feauthdev.etc.net%252Fcgi-bin%252Fprintenv%253FsunwMethod%253DGET%26RequestID%3D15432%26MajorVersion%3D1%26MinorVersion%3D0%26ProviderID%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252F
eauthdev.etc.net%253A80%252Famagent%26IssueInstant%3D2007-04-19T18%253A19%253A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:27:293 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: Query String received: TARGET=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fprintenv%3FsunwMethod%3DGET&RequestID=15432&MajorVersion=1&MinorVersion=0&ProviderID=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%3A80%2Famagent&IssueInstant=2007-04-19T18%3A19%3A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
WARNING: Advice List is : null
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: targetURL = http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: gotoURL = http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET
04/19/2007 06:19:27:321 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDC Servlet: Directory matches for http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/ is:{AMIdentity object: id=eauthdev_apache_8080,ou=agent,dc=mycompany,dc=com AMSDKDN=uid=eauthdev_apache_8080,ou=agents,dc=mycompany,dc=com={sunidentityserverdevicestatus=[Active], sunidentityserverdevicekeyvalue=[agentRootURL=http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/]}}
04/19/2007 06:19:27:400 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
WARNING: Invalid GoTo URL: http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET for Agent ID: http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/
04/19/2007 06:19:27:400 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
ERROR: CDCServlet.doGetPost:Exception occured
java.lang.Exception: Invalid Agent: Could not get agent for the realm
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.LdapSPValidator.validateAndGetRestriction(LdapSPValidator.java:200)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.redirectWithAuthNResponse(CDCServlet.java:288)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.doGetPost(CDCServlet.java:247)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.doGet(CDCServlet.java:194)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:796)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:917)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.servletService(ApplicationFilterChain.java:391)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:297)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:178)
at com.sun.identity.setup.AMSetupFilter.doFilter(AMSetupFilter.java:86)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:178)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:270)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal(StandardContextValve.java:241)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:182)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:571)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:160)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:571)
at com.sun.webserver.connector.nsapi.NSAPIProcessor.process(NSAPIProcessor.java:149)
at com.sun.webserver.connector.nsapi.NSAPIConnector.service(NSAPIConnector.java:995)
Does anybody knows what is going wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Vivek

One more thing Vivek : seems like the problem comes from the fact that the there's 3 checks done to ensure the goto URL matches what's in the agent profile, and one of them (the port check) fails.
agentRootURL has port 80. The gotoURL doesn't.
Try not specifying a port number for key agentRootURL and tell me if that works.
Side note : it seems you might not have the following property enabled in your AMConfig.properties :
com.sun.identity.enableUniqueSSOTokenCookie = true
HTH,
N.

VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

Hi All,
I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the internal table tkomv[].
If any one came across this scenario can you please help me.
Request your valuable inputs

Hi,
Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

PF not getting deducted for the mid month joinees.

Hi,
The problem is coming in the PF deduction of the employees who have joined in the mid of the month.
For ex if an employee's basic salary is 7000 and the emp joined in the mid of the month , the system is taking PF from RS 3500 , where PF deduction is not applicable. Now the result is PF is not getting deducted for that month which should not happen.
So kindly guide me how to apply a check in the system so that it deducts the PF of those employees who are joining in the mid of the month and their basic salary is above Rs6500.

check
INPA4
INPA3
INPA2
INPA1
tables V_INPA1 check the configuration once
if u dont want f

Class not getting called by the Select Statement

Dear All,
I have created a new class "Z1_EXIT_VARIABLES" in my Dev system and coded for a new Exit Variable for InfoObject "0FISCPER3" in this class.
But on debugging the Function module "EXIT_SAPLRRS0_001" (INCLUDE ZXRSRU01), I could find that the Select statement
<i>select CLSNAME
into l_clsname
from VSEOIMPLEM
where REFCLSNAME = 'ZBWIF_VAR_EXIT'.
</i>
calls ALL the classes mentioned in the table "VSEOIMPLEM" with REFCLSNAME = ZBWIF_VAR_EXIT, EXCEPT the class "Z1_EXIT_VARIABLES". Therefore, the code written by me is not getting executed.
Also, after debugging the same function module in Quality system, I could find that not all of the classes mentioned in the table "VSEOIMPLEM"are getting called by the select statement.
(I do not have authorization for CMOD in my Dev system)
Can anyone suggest a possible solution to the problem ?
Regards
Shalabh Jain

Hi,
Still waiting for response.
The issue is not with finding control and performing action on it.
The coded UI automation script is able to find the control and performing click on that, and after that is is supposed to display the results, which is not happening.
I am not able to find out why the results are not displaying with coded UI but it's working as expected with SELENIUM web driver.
I have to do it with CODED UI VS2013, So i request you to give me some solution for this issue, I have done automation earlier for some similar web applications, but never faced this situation.
Studio: VS2013
Scripting Language: C#
HtmlHyperlink performSearchLink = new HtmlHyperlink(inventoryWindow);
performSearchLink.SearchProperties.Add(HtmlHyperlink.PropertyNames.InnerText, "Search");
Mouse.Click(performSearchLink);
this code is working fine, it's clicking on search but not displaying the results.
someone reply asap.
Thanks
Adrusta

% is not getting correctly for the Grand Total Row in OBI10g

Hi,We have a report in table view with the following structure.
Name     Target     Act     %Ach
ABC     100     50     50
XYZ     200     10     5
Total     300     60     27.5
The value for the %Ach Total row should be 20% but in the report it is showing as 27.5.
any one observed this ,how to correct this??
Thanks

Hi,
To get grand total correctly..configure instanceconfig.xml and put..
<ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled> between <serverinstace>..
refer..
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/2009/09/obiee-grand-totals-with-calculated.html
Hope it solves ur problem

Graph in BEX not displaying data for the selected range

Hi Gurus,
I am running a report for the calweek 200801-200840. But the graph is displaying value upto 200835. The data is available in the cube till 200840.
Please help!!
Thanks
Nisha

Hi Nisha,
Please check once again whether there is data for 200836 to 200840 for the corresponding selections and restrictions you have mentioned in the design of your query.
Regards,
Suresh

Values not getting displayed in the selection screen for Hierarchies?

Hi All,
Our system was upgraded from BW 3.1 to 2004s. The quality system displayes values when query result is filtered for a hierarchy infoobject but the production system does not display any values and sometimes throws an error 'The operation failed because of a server error. See system logs.' There is no changes done for hierarchies in both the systems.
Please let me know if anyone has had similar problems.
Thanks,
Krishna

Hi All,
Our system was upgraded from BW 3.1 to 2004s. The quality system displayes values when query result is filtered for a hierarchy infoobject but the production system does not display any values and sometimes throws an error 'The operation failed because of a server error. See system logs.' There is no changes done for hierarchies in both the systems.
Please let me know if anyone has had similar problems.
Thanks,
Krishna

Adobe form output not getting displayed for the whole length of the page

Hi All,
I have developed an adobe form using webdynpro application. While testing, the output(pdf) does not occupy the entire page/screen from end-user side. But when I test the same from my side, the output appears fine . Could anyone suggest me on this?
Regards,
Allwin.

Did you check the resolution at end user side? Is it different from your resolution?
To overcome this check what is the height and width you have specified for InteractiveFormUI element in your Web Dynpro application. Have you specified in pixels like 300px? You need to enter it as 100% for both.
Chintan

Getting error ORA-20001: This person does not have preferences for the sele

*) I got user_id by following query
SELECT USER_ID, USER_NAME, FND_USER.*
from FND_USER where user_name = '205174';
*) resource_id by following query:
select * from APPS.PA_PROJECT_ASSIGNMENTS where RESOURCE_ID in (select RESOURCE_ID from APPS.PA_RESOURCES_DENORM where PERSON_ID
in (select PERSON_ID from APPS.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F where EMPLOYEE_NUMBER= 205173) ) ;
*) person_id by following query:
select * from APPS.PA_RESOURCES_DENORM where PERSON_ID in (select PERSON_ID from APPS.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F where EMPLOYEE_NUMBER= 205173) ;
and
Hi,
When I am running following query to submit timesheet, getting following warning msg
anonymous block completed
ORA-20001: This person does not have preferences for the selected effective date
Following is query
set serveroutput on size 1000000
DECLARE
l_tbl_messages hxc_message_table_type;
l_message fnd_new_messages.message_text%type;
i pls_integer;
l_app_blocks hxc_block_table_type := hxc_block_table_type();
l_app_attributes hxc_self_service_time_deposit.app_attributes_info;
l_time_building_block_id number;
l_new_timecard_id number;
l_new_timecard_ovn number;
l_bb_id number;
l_resource_id hxc_time_building_blocks.resource_id%TYPE := 3595; -- XPCPAY
l_start_time hxc_time_building_blocks.start_time%TYPE := fnd_date.canonical_to_date('2011/10/17 00:00:00');
l_measure hxc_time_building_blocks.measure%TYPE := 1;
l_element_type_id varchar2(80) := 'ELEMENT - 50809'; -- Jury Duty
l_comment_text hxc_time_building_blocks.comment_text%TYPE := '';
l_deposit_process hxc_deposit_processes.NAME%TYPE := 'OTL Deposit Process';
l_retrieval_process varchar2(250) := 'BEE Retrieval Process';
BEGIN
fnd_global.apps_initialize ( user_id => 3850 -- XPCPAY
, resp_id => 3595 -- Self Service Time
, resp_appl_id => 809 -- HXC
hxc_timestore_deposit.create_time_entry ( p_measure => l_measure
, p_day => l_start_time
, p_resource_id => l_resource_id
, p_resource_type => 'PERSON'
, p_comment_text => l_comment_text
, p_deposit_process => l_deposit_process
, p_app_blocks => l_app_blocks
, p_app_attributes => l_app_attributes
, p_time_building_block_id => l_bb_id
hxc_timestore_deposit.create_attribute ( p_building_block_id => l_bb_id
, p_attribute_name => 'Dummy Element Context'
, p_attribute_value => l_element_type_id
, p_deposit_process => l_deposit_process
, p_app_attributes => l_app_attributes
hxc_timestore_deposit.execute_deposit_process ( p_validate => TRUE
, p_app_blocks => l_app_blocks
, p_app_attributes => l_app_attributes
, p_messages => l_tbl_messages
, p_mode => 'SUBMIT'
, p_deposit_process => l_deposit_process
, p_retrieval_process => l_retrieval_process
, p_timecard_id => l_new_timecard_id
, p_timecard_ovn => l_new_timecard_ovn
-- OUTPUT MESSAGES --
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('l_new_timecard_id = ' || l_new_timecard_id);
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('l_new_timecard_ovn = ' || l_new_timecard_ovn);
if (l_tbl_messages.COUNT <> 0) THEN
i := l_tbl_messages.FIRST;
LOOP
EXIT WHEN (NOT l_tbl_messages.EXISTS(i));
l_message := fnd_message.get_string ( appin => l_tbl_messages(i).application_short_name
, namein => l_tbl_messages(i).message_name
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (l_tbl_messages(i).message_name);
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (l_message);
i := l_tbl_messages.NEXT(i);
END LOOP;
rollback;
else
commit;
end if;
exception
when others then
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line(SQLERRM);
END;
/

Please check the following MOS notes:
ORA-20001: This Person Does Not Have Preferences For the Selected Effective Date [ID 876324.1]
ORA-20001: This Person Does Not Have Preferences For The Selected Effective Date [ID 761470.1]
Troubleshooting Guide for HRMS API Errors - ORA-20001 and APP Errors [ID 152259.1]
''This Person Does Not Have Preferences For The Selected Effective Date'' Message [ID 287581.1]
Diagnostics - Setup - Time and labour Person - Test failed [ID 397214.1]
Cheers,
ND
Use the "helpful" or "correct" buttons to award points to replies / Mark the thread as answered, if your question is answered.

HRA not getting defaulted in IT - 0008

Hi SAP users,
This will be the most basic configuration but don't know how I am facing a problem in defaulting HRA wage type in IT - 0008 (Basic Pay)
I have created a wage type 9001 which was copied from M230,
In T511 the wage type has INVAL B,   Amount = + & Number/unit = -
In T7INA9
WT        Amt               RAP indc
9001     Blank          A Allowance      INR      01.01.1990      31.12.9999
In T7INT9
WT          Tax Type                         Frequency      Exmpt It     Tax Code
9001      R Tax exemption is Rule      Blank               00.00     SHRA
Also, I have maintained T510 in which 9001 amt is kept as Blank
T539A the below values are maintained;
TM 1 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9000 Basic Salary
TM 2 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9001 HRA
TM 3 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9003 Conveyance Allowance
TM 4 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9006 Personal Pay
TM 5 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9008 Education Allow.
T539J the below values are maintained;
PRZNT 9001 HRA 1 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 9000 Basic Salary     50.00
LGMST
T = Test Basic
PERSK Employee Subgroup
        TM = EXECUTIVE – SM3
                      20/TM
TARIF
T = Test Basic
    PERSK Employee Subgroup
        TM = EXECUTIVE – SM3
                 TM/GM
T7INA1 - TM01 (EXECUTIVE – SM3)
T7INA3 - GM TM 3 TM TM01
T7INA5 - TM01 --> 20/TM
All the configuration is correctly done in the system still it is not defaulting in IT - 0008. Also, I saw a post in whcih it was mentioned that remove HRA from Table T7INT9 then it will be defaulted which i did & it worked. However, as per my understanding it is worng to remove the wt from there as it is used for Tax exemption nd linked with tax code.
Please let me know wht measures should I take to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Prasad lad

Hi Prasad,
The configuration done from your side are correct . As per SAP standard, the HRA will not get defaulted unless IT581 is maintained. So we need to change the procedure to default the HRA WT
1. In Hiring Action, Insert IT581 after the infotype IT0008 so that once you save the infotype 581 , HRA will get defaulted in Infotype 0008
2. In IT581, If you dont know whether the Employee is staying in Rented house or Own house,Then inform your user to select always 'Own Accomodation' and then save it.
3. In ESS, the employee can change the option in IT581 (IT declaration) later.
Only way to get default other than i have mentioned above is removing the Wagetype from Table T7INT9, But the Exemption will not get calculated for the same.
If you have any clarifications, then raise the Oss Message. SAP will definitely say the same thing.
I hope this would resolve this issue.
Thanks
Rajini

Team view data not getting refers for some user

Hi,
We are facing an issue in team view app for mss, manager's are seeing details of employees not belonging to their Org Unit/ data not getting refreshed. This seems to be the Cache related issue where the data of perviously logged in user is displayed to the current user till browser cache are cleared manually.
User don't have permission to clear browser cache. Is there any work around.The issue is coming only for some users.I have enable the 'ABAP HTTP Security session Enabled' property of the system used.
Regards
Pallavi

Hi Karthik,
in the first view I execute the BAPI and in the second view I show the results. In the second view I also submit the modified data via another BAPI.
As I execute and display result of same BAPI in two different views I have bound the same model node to both of these views. Let me give you some sample code for understanding what have I done.
In the first BAPI's search action handler I have written:
          Zsr_Packnr_Validate_Components_Input input = new Zsr_Packnr_Validate_Components_Input();
          wdContext.nodeZsr_Packnr_Validate_Components_Input().bind(input);
          input.addT_Version(new Zsr_Packnr_Field_Values());
          input.addT_Zsr_Genbr(new Zsr_Packnr_Field_Values());
input.setZsr_Gmc(globalMaterialCode);
          input.setZsr_Mrc(mrc);
          input.setZsr_Ctry(country);
          input.setZsr_Dc(distributionChannel);
          input.setZsr_Div(commercialSegment);
wdContext.nodeOutput_Validate().invalidate(); //as u suggested
          wdContext.currentZsr_Packnr_Validate_Components_InputElement().modelObject().execute();
          wdContext.nodeOutput_Validate().invalidate();
In the second BAPI I just display the output node from the same Model context node (its mapped to the second view too).
But as I said whenever I update some values in the result set and submit it the data gets submitted properly. But when I press the search button again, the previous set of data gets populated, not the just updated data.
If anybody has some idea on why the second time search BAPI execution still shows the previous set of result it will be a great help to me.
Thanks for all your help.
Shubhadip

Header Vendor text is not getting displayed for PO in BBP_PD transaction.

Hi Experts,
We are upgrading SRM 3.0 to SRM 7.0 .In the upgraded sys the Header Text 'HTXT' is not getting displayed for the Purchase order created in BBP_PD. For the SCs the Header text field is populated correctly.
Inputs on this will be very helpful.
Regards,
Ravi.K

Ravi,
Check in IMG if the text schema is used in configuring PO transaction type. Define Transaction Types is the setting.
SG

Org unit is not getting defaulted for the selected position in infotype0001

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for