Organization Structures For FI and CO

Hi,
Anyone can help me in this.
Thanks & Regards
Rajani

Please refer below post:
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=4671834&messageID=3777036
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=4671834&messageID=3967425
Pls assign points as way to say thanks

Similar Messages

Set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario

Hi!
I would like to set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario within SAP Portal.
Question:
1) How to set up/map real user from SU01 to Manager? (tcode, report)
2) How to mark them as 'Chief' (tcode, report)
3) How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
Which SAP course or SDN blog describes this?
Thank you very much!
regards
Jürgen

How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
Check It000 and IT0001 here u will get objects from OM and PA (position ID , Job Key, organisational Key)
and integration switch
check plogi orga , plogi plogi , plogi perli in V_T77s0
Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 10, 2009 6:53 PM

How to modify organizational structure for workflow?

Hi,
What is the best practice for modifying the organizational structure for workflow? I know I can do all the changes in development and move it to production via transport system but is that always required.
It seems tedious to transport the org plan from dev to prod every time there is a position change etc.
And it does not allow you to change it in production since the client is locked.
I don't even have all the users I have in production in my dev box so I can't assign the correct ones to positions. Would it mean I have to have the users in the dev box mirror the ones in production?
Thank you,
Sergiy

This answer depends on the HR managment that you have there, if the HR area is a good coordinated area the best answer is to configure the system for automatic transports and pass the HR structures in this way, you can lock some dangerous infotypes in the T77TR tables and be sure that you will not have any trouble with that data. the best thing using this option is to have a specific DEV client to transport the HR structures.
If you will not have any control between the Dev Environment changes and some people will modify in Prod and other people will make transports in a Dev environment, the best option is to open the client and modify the Org structures every time you need it.
Refers to the SAP Press book Practical Workflow, section 5.4.2.
Regards.

Organizational structure for MSS scenario

Hi!
I would like to set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario within SAP Portal.
Question:
1) How to set up/map real user from SU01 to Manager? (tcode, report)
2) How to mark them as 'Chief' (tcode, report)
3) How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
Which SAP course or SDN blog describes this?
Thank you very much!
regards
Jürgen

Hi,
For MSS,
Perner have the chief position in organization structure that you can create in transaction PP01 and for relation ship infotype you have tio create 012 relationship.
Infotype 0105 with subtype System User Name must exist
PLOGI ORGA Switch MUSt BE Activated
Regards,
Kapil

Organization Structure for multiple countries

Hi,
We are setting up GLOBAL support organization. Our support organization includes following countries:
1. China
2. Japan
3. Korea
I am reading the SAP blog from forum. It says that,
"Enter the necessary data in the address tab (City and Country). In the Function Tab, Select Service and Service Organization. In the Attributes Tabs, check for the attribute maintenance Scenario: Service that you have a value in the attribute Country. Be aware that the basic organizational determination process is based on the Country value. This means that all of your business partners should have the same value in this attribute. If you have more than one country then you should create several organizations".
My query is:
In my organization structure, it involves three countries (China, Japan & Korea). I have included all the three countries in a single organization structure. But as per the above statement, should i need to create three organization structure for three countries?
Regards
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
Sorry for late response: but the answer is no, only one structure for each country.
Dr. Berg

What are the central organizational structures for the following SAP applic

What are the central organizational structures for the following SAP applications ?
a)     FI
b)     SD
c)     MM
d)     CO
thanks
manoj

hi,
Inventry and Finance
regards,
varma

Organization structure for Case study .... need yr advice

Hi I am in process of preparing an org structure for one of the company.
The company operations is like .
The company has four factories in different locations and have 3 Regional distribution centers (RDC) across india. Each distribution center has 5 branches (Sales Offices), in this way they 15 Sales offices across India.
Most of the materials are procured by factories independently while some materials are centrally procured. Factories produce Finish goods and they are either sale to customer directly ( big regular customers) , or transferred to RDC to cater the requirements of other MID size customers and the other possibility to transfer it to Branches for Retail customers. RDCs also transfer FG to Branches.
All factories , RDC and branches have warehouse facility , however branches have limited warehouse facility as the customers supported by them are very few and generally deliveries are made directly from RDC / Factory.
They also have one R&D department in another location to develop new products and material is generally transferred from factories to R&D department.They also have one project division at the same (R&D) location which handles commissioning of new plants and procurement of capital goods.
Raw Material , Semi finish and FG are transferred between factories and FG material is also transferred between RDCs.
The group also has another Company which produces another line of products. RDCs and Branches of first company also work for second company (which means same RDC can store FG produced by both companies) and also Branches can also have FG material of both companies. Second company doesnt have any specific R&D or capital division and R&D and capital of first company also work for second company.
Inter company transfer between both companies is a regular practice.
> Proposed Org structure
Company Group Company
Company Code First company and Second company
Factory Configurations
For first company
4 Factories will be 4 plants
Factories Structure (Storage locations / warehouses and storage type)
Since factories have different type of material ( like FG , Raw material , WIP ) therefore I am confused what option I should select
1) 3 storage location ( for each plant) and one warehouse, 1 storage type
2) 1 storage location and three warehouses (I think this is not possible in SAP , not sure ?? )
3) 1 storage location , 1 warehouse and 3 storage types
RDC structure
RDCs have full fledged warehouse facility and therefore thinking of making them also as Plant. Every RDC will have 6 Storage locations , 1 for First company RDC itself, 5 for associated branches and I feel each RDC storage locations should be a associated to a separate warehouse also.
( Since both companies produce different set of products therefore they will have different material and hence thinking of handling products of both companies in same plant and same storage location and warehouse , may be two storage type/area can be defined to differentiate material of both companies.)
Branches: Will be storage locations under RDC ..
While making branches as Storage location . I have another question about valuation , since material from Plant and RDC is being transferred to Branches and from there it is distributed to customers therefore the valuation of FG at BRANCH and RDC should be different as transportation cost , packing , unpacking etc cost should get added at Branch level.
Therefore in case I make branch as Storage location , I will miss the valuation part while if I make them as Plant then there will be lot of documents get generated for each movement. Hence not sure for what option I should go.
R&D:
Since R& D department is involved in testing in New Product development and generally material is required to be scrapped after testing therefore thinking of making it as Plant with one storage location and may be here I dont need any warehouse (WM) here.
Project Division
Project division may also be a separate plant with one storage location and NO WAREHOUSE is required to linked with it.
Purchase Organizations
4 purchase organizations for each plant respectively and 1 centralized purchase Org for central procurement.
Your all valuable inputs are welcome .... looking foward to have a best possible configuration for above mentioned case study.
Regards

Phew... long long question
The rule I generally follow is that the org structure should map reality.
Company code - where Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss are prepared at the end of the year. If an entity does not do this, it is not a company code.
Plant
1) Each manufacturing facility is a plant (could be in 1 location or separate).
2) Each separate location is a plant (even if it only stores goods). May be an overkill, but helps when legal requirements change or the location is upgraded.
So in your case, RDC will be a plant (may be more than 1 if necessary). R&D should be a separate plant without warehouse management
Storage location
The only rule I follow is that there should not be any overlap of storage locations. So physically, any area of say 1 square foot should belong to one and only one storage location. Otherwise there is a lot of confusion during physical inventory. So logical locations are a no-no.
I usually use a lot of storage locations.
Don't have a warehouse spanning multiple plants (even though it is allowed).
Purchasing organizations
Have one for each location of purchase. If there is a team sitting in each plant procuring for only that plant, have it as a separate purchasing org (not strictly necessary, but makes authorization simple). For central purchasing, a central purchasing org should do nicely...
Hope this helps,
Lakshman

Organization structure for Inventory management

Hi All,
I am looking for organization structure specific to inventory management and also data flow architecture.
If there is any standard org structure is available please share with me.
Regards
Vijay

I am looking for organization structure specific to inventory management and also data flow architecture.
> If there is any standard org structure is available please share with me.
Hi Vijay,
Standard Org Structure for IM starts with Plants and ends with Storage Locations. You can create required no of storage locations under your plants, where plants are assigned to company codes. Its always better to copy from master plant 1000/0001 while creating the plants where you can make changes during creation where required (factory calendar etc).
All the material movements within the plant happen between storage locations, material-material, special stocks-unrestricted stocks with no accounting effect.
Movements between the plants can be planned wrt your needs such as STO with no financial postings unless you have plant wise PCA
You can follow the standard avaiable structure for your IM org structure.
Regards
Shiva

Organization Structure for Petro-oil business

Hi experts,
I'm a new consultant, and I'm implementing for a Oil & Gas Project. I want to ask you a recommendation about the solution for Organization structure.
This business sell some kind of good:
1) Hydro: mogas, diezel, mazut, kerosense...
2) Non-Hydro: cement, Iron, gas, lubricant...
I should use two org. structure for each kind, or just unique structure. Because each kind is controlled a different method, so I suggest use two org. structure, but its difficult for reporting.
Plz help me.

Hi Kumar,
Sorry for late response: but the answer is no, only one structure for each country.
Dr. Berg

Organization structure for real-estate project

Hi
I am required to work in a real-estate company project.
I am confused about the organization structure which should be created for the company.
The company undertakes various projects like housing, shopping complexes, malls, wind-mills, etc. and want to know the profitability reports of each individual project. Every time company will be starting new new construction activities.
Please suggest an organization element how I can represent these in the Controlling Area and avoid number of GL accounts growing out of numbers.
Points for helpful answers,
Regards

1. For Activating or Bring IS Retail Real Estate Module is there any additional user cost or license is required ?
Hi Jai
Real estate module is not IS solution, licensing is normal for RE
2. Is it possible to activate two industry solution in the same box ?
yes you can with some small precations
3. If yes, Will Retail and Real Estate or any existing Functional modules affect?
No, there is no impact.
4. Normally what is the time frame for implementing the Real Estate Module for GCC country zone.
That based on project, max is 4 to 6 monts
5. Real Estate is a new installation or Add-on ?
No.
Thanks
Jilani

Sales Organization Structure for Distribution Industry

Hi Experts,
Need some inputs wrt Distribution Industry
1. In Distributor set up. how should we set up the different manufactures which supply the products for distribution.
2. How should we link the manufactures to Products they supply.
3. How should we link the sales representatives to specific manufactures.
4. Would it be a wise decision to incorporate manufactures as a division in the organization structure. Or should we map the manufactures as vendors and maintain the Vendor Info records.
It would be really great if any one can share their experiences wrt to sales organization structure in the Distribution industry especially Pharma Distribution.
Regards,
KK

hi
this is to inform you that:
first of all i have a question to you. you are manufacturer of products that means are you paying excise duty for manufacturing products or only distributor of products.
1. In Distributor set up. how should we set up the different manufactures which supply the products for distribution.
1.a. You can consider if you are manufacturing and distrubuting products
If you are a manufacturer - tae material FERT if you are a distributor - tae HAWA asa material type.
2. How should we link the manufactures to Products they supply.
2.a. the organisation struccture lins each other & MMR also helps to lin
3. How should we link the sales representatives to specific manufactures.
3.a. it may be specific to divisions tae one sales group for each specific divisions.
4. Would it be a wise decision to incorporate manufactures as a division in the organization structure. Or should we map the manufactures as vendors and maintain the Vendor Info records.
4.a. manufacturer as a vendor and different products a divisions.
It would be really great if any one can share their experiences wrt to sales organization structure in the Distribution industry especially Pharma Distribution.
sales organizations : 2 - domestic & exports
distribution channels : 3 - retail - super stocists - C & F agents.
retail/wholesales/distributors/superdistributors/super distributors - all you can consider all into one distribution channel or tae as different distribution channels you have to analyse from reports perspective to have all these.
divisions - products = divisions lie cardiac - orthopedic to name a few.
sales office : you can have many as per your requriment.
sales group : basing on divisions = sales groups
company code = how many balance sheets you are submitting now to AAI that many company codes you have to have.
batch management with FIFO or LIFO strategy has to be mandatory in implementation.
balajia

SAP MM Organization structure for the Utilities Industry

Hi,
Please let me know how does the typlical org structutre should look like for the Utilities company.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Material management organizational structure includes
1. Purchasing Organization,
2. Plant,
3. Storage Location &
4. Purchasing Group.
Note:
It depends how you project or design the purchasing group in the organization & purchase group can be created and represent as department .In general, company have many more departments & need to control & approval of all purchasing documents at department level & at the end to know cost incurred in each department with various activities( more then one& each GL represent one activity) .So in turn Purchasing group(department) is linked to cost center and then different G/L accounts which represent various activities linked with the cost center.
Regards,
Biju K

Directory structure for servlets and webservices in one application

hi,
Can any one help me for creating servlets and webservices in one
application and deploying in Jboss 4.2.0.
I want to know exactly what is the directory structure for creating this
application and what are the additional .xml files for deploying this application.
if any one know this answere please tell the answere.

I figured out a solution - it's a problem of policies. In detail: Server1's codebase entry (file:) refers to the class directory of Server1's project. In the simple case of only Client1, which has no codebase entry, it works fine without a file permission on the side of Server1. In the complex case of Client1+Server2, which has to have a codebase entry (file:) refering to the class directory of the Server2's project on a separate machine, for exactly the same method call from Client1 to Server1 a file permission entry on the side of Server1 is needed for Server1's class directory. But WHY ???
It seems to be a little confusing with the codebase entries, many of the posts are contrary to others and to my personal experiences. Some comments given by Adrian Colley throw a little light upon some aspects. Is there anybody, who can explain the whole topic, when, why, and which part of RMI application deals with codebase entries, also in case of not dynamic code downloading ? May be there is also a reference into the java docs, which I didn't found up to now.
Thanks in advance
Axel

Receiver FCC Structure For Header and Trailer

Hi Guys ,
I need to go for receiver FCC for header and trailer in PI .How the FCC in communication channel needs to be configured if I am taking a separate node for header and trailer in mapping .Output of the file should be as the file attached.
Thanks.
Regards.

Hi,
If you are using File communication channel as a reciver you can go with FCC.
Use record set structure as : Header,detail,trailer.
https://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d2/bab440c97f3716e10000000a155106/content.htm
Otherwise if you are going for SFTP to create the file ... follow the Indrajit suggestion..
Still facing any issue.. Please let us know..
Thanks,
Sreenivas...

Organizational Structure for Public sector

Hi Experts ,
I am in a public sector company ...would like to know is there any change in organizational sector ...can any one send me link or document or template so that i can have a view of Standard SAP public sector org.structure ...so that i can check how all the elements in the organization like FI,MM,SD integrate into it .....
Regards
Albert .

You can also take a look at the Best Practices for Public Sector documentation. There you can find some preconfigured Business Scenarios with their corresponding structures. Currently the Best Practices released are based on Belgium. In a future more countries will follow.
<a href="http://help.sap.com/bp_publicsectorv2600/PS_BE/HTML/index.htm">Best Practices for Public Sector BE</a>
there you can browse into:
Business Information --> Business Blueprint
and also
Business Information --> Preconfigured scenarios
although this is just a template may get you an idea of a working configuration for Public Sector. Details will actually be highly dependant on your country and PS organization.
regards,
Diego

Organization Structures For FI and CO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for