Organization unit in process modeler

In process modeler I have created stores, like SUPPLIERS, INVOICES, which will be entities. I placed them in the unspecified organization unit. It is better to create a new organization unit like IT_DATABASE? Is an IT_DATABASE an organization unit? What do you think about it?

I think "DEPARTMENTS" is a generic name... you may give a specific name....
Anyway , you can pose the "INVOICES" datastore to the ACCOUNTING dept.... and the SUPPLIERS datastore to the ACCOUNTING DEPT or to DEPARTMENTAL DEPT regarding the department which deals with them (the management of suppliers) ....
Greetings,
Sim

Similar Messages

How to link Organization Units and Entities in Oracle Designer 9i 9.0.2.8 ?

Hi,
I am working with Oracle Designer in a project where we need to asses the Business Process Model of the customer, mapping it in Oracle Designer.
The Customer wants to see the relationship between Business Entity and Organization Units and Processes.
We are following this approach:
- define Entity
- define Organization Unit
- draw process models with Oracle Designer Process Modeler, defining the single process steps and indicating the Organization Unit who performs that activity;
- draw a Data Flow Diagram for each Entity with Oracle Designer Data Flow Diagrammer, including the business function we have defined as process steps within the Process Modeler.
Process Modeler allows us to link process steps to Organization Units, while Data Flow Diagrammer links Entity to business functions ( which are equal to our process steps). So we expect that for the "transitive properties" Organization Units should be linked automatically to Entity.
At the end, using Oracle Designer Matrix Diagrammer we only see the relationship between Business Functions and Entity and not the one between Organization Unit and Entity .
In fact, if we open Object Repository Navigator and check the property "Business Unit Entity Usage" of the Business Unit, there is no evidence of the entity related to the business function performed by the Organization/Business Unit.
Could someone helps us to understand how to use correctly the Oracle Designer Tools ?
We look forward to hearing from you.
Regards
Flavia Ercoli & Rodrigo Silveira

I would recommend the 10g version anyday over the previous versions. If you use any of the other supporting apps (forms, reports, portal....) your already at a much better release :)
Is there a reason you would want to use the prior version?

Business Process Modeling and Organizational Change Management

Many Change Management interventions are based on the business understanding the TO BE processes, how the process will change end-to-end, including not only the processes within SAP but also how they will interface with the entire application landscape. Id like to hear experiences and best practices. Who, how and when should those business process models be completed? What would be the role of Change Management in this piece?

Hi Claudia
Very interesting question!. This is the most challenging task an org unit is facing today. Before implementation you must be able to foresee what impact a new end to end business process would have on the present organizational set up. To visualize you need to have people who has knowledge in their respective business. It is no easy task. That is why you need to break & analyse each process in minute detail and compare to be process with the present process. To have an effective process in place you have to examine who is the Business process owner, if the owner does not follow or comply with the new process what is the risk involved, & what makes it mandatory that the process owner follows it and so is all down the line managers. What I mean to say is that by analyzing each and every new process you should be able to derive some KPI from this. This is how control can be built. This is all simple management technique but I have seen many new processes in ERP failing or not being used because of lack of Management control. I have answered who & how part. Now coming back to when part. The change management initiative has to start long before the actual ERP implementation. One has to prepare the organisation for taking a massive leap from a mere paper based organisation to accepting a system that can touch almost any business application. An organisation which has not prepared itself to accept the changes and hurriedly implements a system for the sake of project completion can see that the benefits projected in the business case may never be realized.
Reward points if found useful
Regards
Alok Sengupta

Organization Unit to Business Process

Hello,
in which table are the Organization Units to corresponding Business Processes saved?
How is this table linked to other Business Process tables?
Regards
Philipp

hi
yeah CRM_ORGMAN_POPUP_INF_1020_READ is the table for you.
you get all the process relation to your BP here
best regards
ashish

SRM 5.0 Exception E:BBP_BUPA:034 -Organizational unit in SUS

Hello,
We are in process of upgrade srm 4.0 to srm 5.0 , as configured Plan driven procuremnet with supplier enablement scenario . Connected R/3 (46 c) to SUS using PI 7.0 . But stuck in problem as no new vendor replicated in sus from R/3. XML message processing shows error at SUS system ie ..
"An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_BUPA:034 -Organizational unit 50000001 does not exist; check entries Programm:"
while successfully updated existing( working with srm 4.0 since last two years) vendors from same system ,
pls advise.
Regards,
Santosh
I am came across the organization plan change for srm 5.0. Want to be clarify that is it also applicable for SUS organization for vendors.
report BBP_XPRA_ORGEH_TO_VENDOR_GROUP
can any one light on it.
Message was edited by:
 Santosh Patil

Hi
Please read this carefully ->
See the following SAP OSS Notes as well ->
Note 957851 SRMSUS: Modification in usermanagement for CUA replication
Note 792364 SRM50/SUS/BP: Conversion of SUS business partner
Note 628547 SRM-SUS: Corrections for SUS 2.0 SP01: business partner,user
Report BBP_XPRA_ORGEH_TO_VENDOR_GROUP
[Convert Org. Units to Vendor Groups ]
Mode details
Mode Short text
0 Do not carry out structure checks
1 Business partner exists for root org.
2 Partner for root org. (only) has org. unit role
3 All level 2 nodes are org. units
4 All level 2 nodes have business partners
5 All level 2 nodes have (only) org. unit role
6 All level 3 nodes are org. units
7 All level 3 nodes have business partners
8 All partners (level 3) has (at least) org.unit + bidder role
9 All level 4 nodes are positions
Purpose of this report
This report converts the HR organizational model for external business partners (bidders, vendors, and their employees).
You have to run this report after an upgrade from BBP 2.0C, EBP 3.0, EBP 3.5, EBP 4.0 and SRM Server 5.0 for every root organizational unit of these external business partners (if you have several such root unit, you have to run the report several times).
This report does not run across clients, so you have to start it separately in every client that you have.
The conversion is required because, in the new HR organizational model, external objects can no longer be stored as object 'O' (=organizational unit); consequently, it is no longer possible to create positions for external objects.
This has the following effects for external business partners who are stored in the organizational model:
The old root object, the 'Central Organizational Unit for Vendors' will in future not be an organizational unit, but rather an organizational object of the type 'VG' (=vendor group)
The interim nodes that were created for reasons of system performance (each containing 100 vendors/bidders) will in future not be an organizational unit, but rather an organizational object of the type 'VG' (=vendor group)
The external business partners of the type Organization (bidders, vendors) are no longer represented by a separate organizational object (in other words, there is no longer an organizational object that has the identity relationship to the partner)
Since the org. object that previously represented the partners is missing, the business partners are now linked directly with the interim nodes (previously, the organizational unit for the partner, and not the partner itself, was linked)
If a business partner has a set of attributes that is different to the attribute values specified for the interim node, the partner in question is not linked directly to the interim node, but rather to another 'VG' object (which has the attributes of the partner), which in turn is linked to the interim node.
Previously, if an external business partner had an employee and this employee has a user in the system, the employee staffed the position in the organizational unit that represented the partner. However, since this organizational unit no longer exists, the position and the staffing relationship no longer exist either. This means, among other things, that there is no reporting option in HR that enables you to navigate from a user to the business partner of the user's company.
Since there is currently no way of directly assigning a user to a business partner (of the type Person), the organizational object 'CP' (=Central Person) is still used to establish this link.
Once the conversion report has run successfully, you will no longer be able to see the organizational structure of the external business partners by calling transaction PPOSA_BBP (or PPOMA_BBP).
However, a new transaction called PPOMV_BBP is available instead. You can use this transaction to display the converted (and newly generated) structure for bidders/vendors.
Prerequisites
Before you actually convert your organizational structure, you should let the report check the structure, and correct any errors that the report detects.
Features
The report has the following features:
A 'Check Only' mode is available, which you can use to check the consistency of the organizational structure of the external business partners at different levels
The report can be restarted. This means if the conversion is canceled due to errors or system problems, and you restart the report, it will recognize any new objects that have already been generated, thus ensuring that structure elements that have already been processed are not converted a second time (this is achieved by evaluating at runtime the log tables BBP_O_TO_VG_OBJ (for generated objects) and BBP_O_TO_VG_REL (for generated relationships)).
If you use table BBP_MARKETP_INFO to store the root organizational units, the report changes the old entries accordingly.
The report writes an application log (log object BBP_XPRA_O_TO_VG) in which messages are logged at two different levels; alternatively, you can request that the message be output directly ('WRITE', for background spool lists).
Although we do not recommend that you do this (because it can result in very long response times), you can run the report in parallel and thus convert several root organizational units at the same time.
Activities
Start the report for every 'Central Organizational Unit for Vendors' (root organizational units for external business partners) in every client that you use.
Annotations
We recommend that you do not use the 'Direct Message Output' option (that is, the option where an application log is not written) in conjunction with the 'Detailed Message Output' option for larger organizational structures, because every object and relationship that is generated will be output, and you will not feasibly be able to process this list.
Even if you use it in conjunction with the writing of an application log, the 'Detailed Message Output' option rarely makes sense if you have tens or hundreds of thousands of vendors/bidders.
Estimated work/expenditure necessary
The runtime for this report depends on the hardware, system load, and structure involved (for example, the number of vendors/bidders who have employees and users and, therefore, also positions, the number of vendors who have attributes different than those of the interim node, and so on).
As a rule of thumb, though, structures with vendors where 10% of users have their own individual attributes are processed at the rate of approximately 25,000 per hour.
Remember, however, that the time required depends to a large degree on the number of nodes where local attributes have been defined, and on the number of business partners who have users.
This can lead to situations where an organizational structure with 100,000 nodes but no local attributes or users can be converted more quickly that a structure with only 5,000 nodes but with local attributes and assigned users.
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

Oracle Designer : Process Modeler vs. Dataflow Diagrammer

Hi,
I have several questions about the integration between Process Modeler and DF Diagrammer, they seem to be quite similar, even if in the first we can define Organization Units (that are equal to Business Units), while in the second tool we can add the information about the entities and attributes related to a certain function, specying better the data flow between business functions.
So, it seems that both tools are necessary to decompose business process, to specify which organization units perform a certain activity, to definy dataflow and which entities/attributes are related to a certain business function.
In this case, what is the correct way to use both these tools, avoiding creating double diagrams (one with the Process Modeler, the other with the Dataflow Diagrammer) ? Does anyone know if there is any guideline provided by Oracle ?
My idea is to create a huge DFD, using all the process steps defined within the Process Modeler at the lowest level of the diagram (including them as global functions), specifying the dataflow between each other and the entities related to the single process steps (in the DFD they are called business functions).
Has anyone ever followed an approach like this ?
Thank you very much !!
Flavia & Rodrigo

Unfortunately, these two diagram tools are not as well integrated with Designer as I would like. They also do not play well together. Normally, I want a process model to show an overview, and want to choose whether to hide the details of a process, requiring a drill down, or expand them on the same diagram. In a DFD, however, I always want to drill down to expand each process. In Designer, you must choose, break processes into sub-processes, or have one big process, you can't have it both ways. Effectively, I must choose to use the Process Modeller or the Data Flow Diagrammer, but not both. For communication with users, I prefer Process Models, but having one big process not only screws up the DFD, it also screws up the Functional Hierarchy Diagrammer, which eventually can screw up any menus you generate.
There is also a problem with the "swim lanes" in the Process Modeler. They have nothing to do with the External data sources and sinks in the DFD. They also don't generate security and role information in the physical design.
These are areas where Designer could use some improvements, but it isn't going to get them. Oracle has decided that Designer is "mature" and is now in maintenance mode.

Function module for automating creation of organizational unit

Experts,
I am using SRM 4.0. In my system R/3 is acting as backend.
For creation of new organisational unit in SRM, which is not present in SRM but present in R/3 side i have to do the manual activity every time.
Is there any function module? Which can automate this process. If there is any function module which i can use please let me know. and how can i use that also please let me know.
By this automation every time through the program the new organization unit should created in SRM side.
Please let me know..
Thanks in advance. I will appriciate through rewards points.

Hi,
Thanks for your input. But i am planning to send one file for HR records and then from that file through program i will upload the file. IF for some user the orgaisation unit will not be found then there itself it would create the OU through Function module(If Any)... I am doing like this as the HR system is some legacy system not the R/3 system.
So Please help me to find out function module.
i will appeciate for you help.
Thanks

Using ARIS process models as the foundation for Business Process Monitoring

Hello,
Do anyone know if you can use IDS Scheer ARIS process models and the integration between IDS Scheer ARIS and SAP Solution Manager as the starting point for end-to-end Business Process Monitoring (BPM) so that you get the process description/model automatically in Solution Manager BPM and just need to configure the monitoring (more or less that you monitor against the modelled process in ARIS)?
Is there an API for SAP Solution Manager BPM so that non-SAP solutions/systems can be part of the end-to-end process monitoring?
If not, how do you usually integrate non-SAP solutions that are part of an end-to-end process that you want to monitor into SAP Solution Manager BPM, or do you not use Solution Manager BPM for this?
What is the roadmap for SAP around SAP Solution Manager BPM when it comes to non-SAP systems/applications/solutions and the new SAP NetWeaver BPM functionality?
Regards,
Markus Johansson

Hello Markus,
I just paste my answer form the other forum entry Re: Business process management strategy in SAP?
in a nutshell BPM Netweaver is focussing on so called edge-processes (usually
SOA-based and often workflow related). These edge-processes a thought to enhance exisitng core business processes and should provide the fast competitive edge versus competitors. Examples would be also xApps. For this Netweaver provides process modelling tools, where you can get exectuable code through the integration between CE and PI. The monitoring part for these processes is mainly targeting business end-users and business manager.
Business Process Monitoring with Solution Manager focusses on core business processes which are realized with the "conventional", "old" SAP Architecture, e.g. Order-to-Cash or Procure-to-Pay. You get a combination of technical monitors (average response times of transactions, background job runtimes, monitors for IDOC or qRFC processing) and application related monitors (you get more than 200 pre-configured application monitors out-of-the-box like number of overdue customer orders or outbound deliveries or number of deliveries with goods issue posted but no invoice). The target group here is the support organization of the customer, from Basis-Support over application support on IT side to process owner on business department side.
Overview presentations can be found under
https://service.sap.com/bpm --> Media Library --> Customer Information -->
"Business Process Monitoring - Part 1 & 2".
Or look under https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/nw-processmonitoring
In the end BPM Netweaver and BPMon SolMan are complementary for different purposes and different target groups.
Best Regards
Volker

Business Partner Number in Organizational Unit

Hi All,
I am Configuring Organizationla model in CRM 4.0, as we know the system automatically generates a BP of role type of Organizational Unit as soon as we save the Organizational Unit which we created.
But in my case Partner ID is generating but not Business Partner can you please advice me in this regard?
I have checked all the number ranges and all.everything is ok but i dont understand what is missing and where? This is Urgent plz.
It would be great help if you can spare some time in this regard.
Hopefully waiting for your reply at the earliest.
Thanks and warm regards,
Vali.

It should create a BP of type Org as soon as you add a organization in the Org model.
Go to Tx ppoma_crm (Maintain Org Model).
Create a Org and add other data like address and save it .
Exit the screen and open the org model again you would see the BP Number under the Business Partner column for the selected Org.You couls also see Code,ID,Valid from,Valid to columns for the organization.
Take the BP Number and open it through BP transaction.
Thanks,
Thirumala.

Organization unit ID is different in Dev and Quality Systems

Hi Experts,
We have downloaded the Organizational Structure from ECC in the Dev System, Sales organizations, Sales offices and sales groups were created with number range Assigned to Current Active Plan version. but the number for the Sales orgs started with 50000026 instead of starting with 50000001. And in the Quality again we have downloaded the Org. structure from ECC, now the IDs were created starting from 50000007. this causing the inconsistencies in the Qualtiy System like, Pricing procedures are not getting determined.
why the Ids were created from 50000026 instead of 50000001.
What are best practices to have the same ID for Organizational Units in both the Systems?
Thanks and Regards,
S Reddy

Hi Kiran,
thanks for responses,
Now we are planning to delete the Org. Structure in Quality and planning transport if from Development. What is best approach to save the Org. model in Transport request and move to Quality. I came to know about the report RHMOVE30, will it be used for transporting from Dev to Quality?
One more thing, if we transfer the Org data to Quality will it take the same no. in Quality. I have doubt, If Dev Org Id were created from 50000026 and Quality it will start from 50000000.
Kindly help me,
thanks and Regards,
S Reddy

How to get Personnel Numbers from Organizational Unit ?

Hello All,
I have a requirement in the HR module to get a list of all the personnel numbers maintained for a Organizational Unit.
Is there any Function Module to find out the Personnel Numbers assigned to a Organizational Unit for HR module ?
Thanks,
Ketan.

Hi Ketan,
    I'm not sure that there is any Function Module available for finding the Personnel Numbers. I have listed some Tables in HR Module try whether this will help you in finding Personnel Numbers for Organizational Unit.
DD01L Domains
DD02L SAP tables
DD03L Table Fields
DD03T DD: Texts for fields (language dependent)
DD04L Data elements
DD04T R/3 DD: Data element texts
DD05S Foreign key fields
DD06L Pool/cluster structures
DD20L Matchcode Ids
DD24S Fields of a matchcode ID
T000    Clients
T001    Company Codes
T001E Company code-dependent address data
T001P Personnel Areas/Subareas
T012    House banks
T012K House bank accounts
T012T House bank account names
T500L Personnel Country Grouping
T500P Personnel Areas
T500T Personnel Country Groupings
T501    Employee Group
T501T Employee Group Names
T502T Marital Status Designators
T503    Employee Groups / Subgroups
T503K Employee subgroup
T503T Employee Subgroup Names
T504A Benefits - Default Values (NA)
T504B Benefit Option Texts (North America)
T504C Benefit Type (NA)
T504D Benefit Credit Group Amount
T504E Benefit Amount
T504F Benefit Costs
T508A Work Schedule Rules
T508T Texts for Employee Subgroup Groupings for Work Schedules
T510   Pay Scale Groups
T510A Pay Scale Types
T510F Assign Pay Scale > Time Unit, Currency
T510G Pay Scale Areas
T510H Payroll Constants with Regard to Time Unit
T510I Standard Working Hours
T510J Constant Valuations
T510L Levels
T510M Valuation of pay scale groups acc. to hiring date
T510N Pay Scales for Annual Salaries (NA)
T510S Time Wage Type Selection Rule
T510U Pay Scale Groups
T510Y Special Rules for Wage Type Generation
T511    Wage Types
T512R Cumulation Wage Types in Forms
T512S Texts for Cumulation Wage Types in Forms
T512T Wage Type Texts
T512W Wage Type Valuation
T512Z   Permissibility of Wage Types per Infotype
T513    Jobs
T514S Table Name Texts
T514T Field Name Texts
T51D2 Wage Type Classes
T51D3 Reduction Rules
T51D4 Cumulation Rules
T527X Organizational Units
T528B Positions - Work Centers
T528C Wage Type Catalog
T528T Position Texts
T529A Personnel Event
T529F Fast Data Entry for Events
T529T Personnel Event Texts
T52BT Texts For HR Objects
T52C0 Payroll Schemas
T52C1 Payroll Schemas
T52C2 Texts for Personnel Calculation Schemas
T52C3 Texts for Personnel Calculation Schemas
T52C5 Personnel Calculation Rules
T52CC Schema Directory
T52CD Schema Directory
T52CE Directory of Personnel Calculation Rules
T52CT Text Elements
T52CX Cross References via Generated Schemas
T52D1 Valid Processing Classes
T52D2 Valid Values for Processing Classes
T52D3 Valid Evaluation Classes
T52D4 Permitted Values for Evaluation Classes
T52D5 Wage Type Groups
T52D6 Wage Type Group Texts
T52D7 Assign Wage Types to Wage Type Groups
T52D8 Valid Processing Classes - Texts
T52D9 Valid Values for Processing Classes - Texts
T530 Reasons for Events
T530E Reasons for Changes
T530F Reasons for Changes
T530L Wage Types for Special Payments
T530T Event Reason Texts
T531 Deadline Types
T531S Deadline Type Texts
T533 Leave Types
T533T Leave Type Texts
T539A Default Wage Types for Basic Pay
T539J Base Wage Type Valuation
T539R Events for Standard Wage Maintenance
T539S Wage Types for Standard Wage Maintenance
T548 Date Types
T548S Date Conversion
T548T Date Types
T548Y Date Types
T549A Payroll Areas
T549B Company Features
T549C Decision Trees for Features (Customers)
T549D Feature Directory
T549L Date modifiers
T549M Monthly Assignment: Payroll Period
T549N Period Modifiers
T549O Text for date modifier
T549P Valid Time Units for Payroll Accounting
T549Q Payroll Periods
T549R Period Parameters
T549S Payroll date types
T549T Payroll Areas
T549M Monthly Assignment: Payroll Period
T549N Period Modifiers
T549O Text for date modifier
T549P Valid Time Units for Payroll Accounting
T549Q Payroll Periods
T549R Period Parameters
T549S Payroll date types
T549T Payroll Areas
T554S Absence and Attendance Types
T554T Absence and Attendance Texts
T554V Defaults for Absence Types
T554Y Time Constraints in HR TIME
T555A Time Types
T555B Time Type Designations
T559A Working Weeks
T559B Name of Working Week
T572F Event Texts
T572G Allowed Values for Events
T572H Event Value Texts
T582A Infotypes
T582B Infotypes Which Are Created Automatically
T582S Infotype Texts
T582V Assignment of Infotypes to Views
T582W Assigns Infotype View to Primary Infotype
T582Z Control Table for PA Time Management
T584A Checking Procedures - Infotype Assignment
T588A Transaction Codes
T588B Infotype Menus
T588C Infotype Menus/Info Groups
T588D Infogroups for Events
T588J Screen Header Definition
T588M Infotype Screen Control
T588N Screen Modification for Account Assignment Block
T588O Screen Modification for Assignment Data
T588Q Screen types for fast entry
T588R Selection Reports for Fast Data Entry
T588S Screen Types for Fast Entry
T588T Menu and Infogroup Designations
T588V Business object type
T588W Event types for infotype operations
T588X Cust. composite definition of event types for IT operations
T588Z Dynamic Events
T591A Subtype Characteristics
T591B Time Constraints for Wage Types
T591S Subtype Texts
T596F HR Subroutines
T596G Cumulation wage types
T596H _Cumulation wage type texts
T596I Calculation rule for cumulation wage types
T596U Conversion Table
T599B Report Classes
T599C Report Classes
T599D Report Categories
T599F Report Classes - Select Options
T777A Building Addresses
T777T Infotypes
T777Z Infotype Time Constraints
T778T Infotypes
T778U Subtypes
Error Messages tables
T100 Messages
T100A Message IDs for T100
T100C Control of messages by the user
T100O Assignment of message to object
T100S Configurable system messages
T100T Table T100A text
T100V Assignment of messages to tables/views
T100W Assign Messages to Workflow
T100X Error Messages: Supplements

How do we link the central organizational unit and purchase organization i

hi friends
How do we link the central organizational unit and purchase organization in SUS configuration?
regards
vinaykrishna

The workflow process is associated to the transaction you select by parameters in the function call.
The Responsibility 9e.g. employee self service) is linked to a menu. The menu contains (amongst other things) functions. If the function is associated to a menu prompt, then when the user clicks on the prompt (e.g. Change Job) the function is invoked. When the function is invoked, it calls the workflow described in the function call.
The function will already (out of the box) point to a workflow process. If you have customised your own process, you will need to amend the function call to call your workflow name.
Look at the function in question and you will see what I mean.
Hope that helps explain it!
Regards
Tim

Missing Organizational Unit Data in Organizational Data Sales

Hi,
when using and working with CRM transactions, I cannot put in the neccessary Organizational Data Saes according to my wishes. (every field should be filled in,)
Org. Unit, Object name, Org. unit, Sales Org. Sales Off. Sales Group, Dis. Chan., Division
VKORG001 Sales Area.. o 50000015 VKORG001 01 01
=> no data are set for Sales Office and Sales Group so far in "F4" entry
This data occur in our Org.Modell and can be choosen manually as well. BUT as soon as they are maintained, the field "Organizational Unit" is empty again and so the transaction has error again.
Any idea about?
Thanks for your support.
Regards,
Markus

Hi Markus,
In CRM goto tcode - SPRO - Customer Relationship Management - Master Data - Organizational Management - Assignment of Organizational Units from SAP ECC - Assign SAP CRM Sales Offices to SAP ECC Sales Offices & Assign SAP CRM Sales Groups to SAP ECC Sales Groups - To maintain Sales Office and Sales Groups.
Then goto tcode PPOMA_CRM and configure the organization model as per your requirements.
Check the below link for further explanations about Sales Area Data.
Re: CRM Middleware- Customer Master Download
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Arun Sankar.

Organizational Unit-BP

Hi gurus.
When i create a new organizational unit, i can't see the business partner asigned in the PPOMA_CRM.
Why can it happen?
Thanks
Regards Miguel.

Hi,
Apart from the above steps given by others you can also follow these steps as they did work in my scenario, this generally take some hours for the system to generate the BP ids so its better to schedule these activities in the evening so that when the Ids would be visible the next day I dont know whether this is a standard but this did happen in my case as i had to create the org structure twice so i had this experience twice.
Scenario when the buffering is not done and the Business partner id is not getting created in ppoma_crm
Check Settings for Attribute Maintenance
Check the consistency of the attribute assignments to the organizational units.
1.     Access the activity using the following navigation options:
Transaction code     SPRO
SAP CRM IMG menu     Customer Relationship Management  Master Data  Organizational Management  Organizational Model  Tools  Check Settings for Attribute Maintenance
2.     Execute the check.
Organizational Data Settings Check
See documentation of the IMG activity for details about this check
1.     Access the activity using the following navigation options:
Transaction code     SPRO
SAP CRM IMG menu     Customer Relationship Management  Master Data  Organizational Management  Organizational Model  Tools  Organizational Data Settings Check
2.     Execute the check.
Setup Buffering for Sales Scenario
Report HRBCI_ATTRIBUTES_BUFFER_UPDATE is used to buffer the attributes of organizational management objects. To enable buffering you have to maintain view T77OMATTR.
Enable Buffering for Sales Scenario
1.     Access the activity using the following navigation option:
Transaction code     OOATTRCUST
2.     Select the structure node Scenarios.
3.     Check the checkbox in the column Buffering for the scenario SALE.
4.     Choose Save.
Update Buffers for Sales Scenario
1.     Access the activity using the following navigation option:
Transaction code     SA38
2.     Call transaction SA38.
3.     Select the report HRBCI_ATTRIBUTES_BUFFER_UPDATE
4.     Select the checkboxes for Delete All Buffers and Restructure buffer on Date.
5.     Choose Execute (F8).
In note 737315 further details regarding this topic are described. Note you can also schedule a job in transaction SM36 to run this report regularly.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Amit

No value found for Organizational Unit BILL_ORG

Hi Experts,
I am creating a Service transaction - Incident and then creating a follow up document (RFC). Upon saving the follow up document the system shows the following error:
An error occurred in system FEDCLNT200 during account assignment
Message no. CRM_ORDER_MISC 060
Orgfinder: No value found for Organizational Unit BILL_ORG (Notification E CRM_OFI 002)
I am not using any billing unit and do not even require one - also made settings for billing unit in Master data>Organization Management> Cross-system assignment of Org.Units... but still facing the same error
Kindly help.
Regards.

Hi Amit,
It has been a long time since I have seen this issue. As far as I remember, and also mentioned in my answer, if distributing the document to another system is not part of your process / requirement, then simply switch off the distribution via status management and transaction control.
Select the status profile and add transaction control to the status on which the error shows up.
Hope it helps !
Haseeb.

Organization unit in process modeler

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for