Organizational element versus organizational unit

Can someone briefly define the difference between an organizational element (OE) and an organizational unit (OU)? I know that Company code, controlling area, plant etc are know as OU. I have also read that "The organizational units in SAP are the elements or structures representing business functions...".
Please define Organizational Element as opposed to Unit. Glossary and other areas of the site are not specific. Thanks, Tom

Hi,
I suggest stop confusing betweek Elements and Units. You can use this interchangeably, dont worry about..
Kalyan Gorla has expalined it to pint..
Have fun with SAP.
Regards,
SB

Similar Messages

  • How to get Personnel Numbers from Organizational Unit ?

    Hello All,
    I have a requirement in the HR module to get a list of all the personnel numbers maintained for a Organizational Unit.
    Is there any Function Module to find out the Personnel Numbers assigned to a Organizational Unit for HR module ?
    Thanks,
    Ketan.

    Hi Ketan,
        I'm not sure that there is any Function Module available for finding the Personnel Numbers. I have listed some Tables in HR Module try whether this will help you in finding Personnel Numbers for Organizational Unit.
    DD01L Domains 
    DD02L SAP tables 
    DD03L Table Fields 
    DD03T DD: Texts for fields (language dependent) 
    DD04L Data elements 
    DD04T R/3 DD: Data element texts 
    DD05S Foreign key fields 
    DD06L Pool/cluster structures 
    DD20L Matchcode Ids 
    DD24S Fields of a matchcode ID 
    T000    Clients 
    T001    Company Codes 
    T001E  Company code-dependent address data 
    T001P  Personnel Areas/Subareas 
    T012    House banks 
    T012K House bank accounts 
    T012T House bank account names 
    T500L Personnel Country Grouping 
    T500P Personnel Areas 
    T500T Personnel Country Groupings 
    T501    Employee Group 
    T501T Employee Group Names 
    T502T Marital Status Designators 
    T503    Employee Groups / Subgroups 
    T503K Employee subgroup 
    T503T Employee Subgroup Names 
    T504A Benefits - Default Values (NA) 
    T504B Benefit Option Texts (North America) 
    T504C Benefit Type (NA) 
    T504D Benefit Credit Group Amount 
    T504E Benefit Amount 
    T504F Benefit Costs 
    T508A Work Schedule Rules 
    T508T Texts for Employee Subgroup Groupings for Work Schedules 
    T510   Pay Scale Groups 
    T510A Pay Scale Types 
    T510F Assign Pay Scale > Time Unit, Currency 
    T510G Pay Scale Areas 
    T510H Payroll Constants with Regard to Time Unit 
    T510I Standard Working Hours 
    T510J Constant Valuations 
    T510L Levels 
    T510M Valuation of pay scale groups acc. to hiring date 
    T510N Pay Scales for Annual Salaries (NA) 
    T510S Time Wage Type Selection Rule 
    T510U Pay Scale Groups 
    T510Y Special Rules for Wage Type Generation 
    T511    Wage Types 
    T512R Cumulation Wage Types in Forms 
    T512S Texts for Cumulation Wage Types in Forms 
    T512T Wage Type Texts 
    T512W Wage Type Valuation 
    T512Z   Permissibility of Wage Types per Infotype 
    T513    Jobs 
    T514S Table Name Texts 
    T514T Field Name Texts 
    T51D2 Wage Type Classes 
    T51D3 Reduction Rules 
    T51D4 Cumulation Rules 
    T527X Organizational Units 
    T528B Positions - Work Centers 
    T528C Wage Type Catalog 
    T528T Position Texts 
    T529A Personnel Event 
    T529F Fast Data Entry for Events 
    T529T Personnel Event Texts 
    T52BT Texts For HR Objects 
    T52C0 Payroll Schemas 
    T52C1 Payroll Schemas 
    T52C2 Texts for Personnel Calculation Schemas 
    T52C3 Texts for Personnel Calculation Schemas 
    T52C5 Personnel Calculation Rules 
    T52CC Schema Directory 
    T52CD Schema Directory 
    T52CE Directory of Personnel Calculation Rules 
    T52CT Text Elements 
    T52CX Cross References via Generated Schemas 
    T52D1 Valid Processing Classes 
    T52D2 Valid Values for Processing Classes 
    T52D3 Valid Evaluation Classes 
    T52D4 Permitted Values for Evaluation Classes 
    T52D5 Wage Type Groups 
    T52D6 Wage Type Group Texts 
    T52D7 Assign Wage Types to Wage Type Groups 
    T52D8 Valid Processing Classes - Texts 
    T52D9 Valid Values for Processing Classes - Texts 
    T530 Reasons for Events 
    T530E Reasons for Changes 
    T530F Reasons for Changes 
    T530L Wage Types for Special Payments 
    T530T Event Reason Texts 
    T531 Deadline Types 
    T531S Deadline Type Texts 
    T533 Leave Types 
    T533T Leave Type Texts 
    T539A Default Wage Types for Basic Pay 
    T539J Base Wage Type Valuation 
    T539R Events for Standard Wage Maintenance 
    T539S Wage Types for Standard Wage Maintenance 
    T548 Date Types 
    T548S Date Conversion 
    T548T Date Types 
    T548Y Date Types 
    T549A Payroll Areas 
    T549B Company Features 
    T549C Decision Trees for Features (Customers) 
    T549D Feature Directory 
    T549L Date modifiers 
    T549M Monthly Assignment: Payroll Period 
    T549N Period Modifiers 
    T549O Text for date modifier 
    T549P Valid Time Units for Payroll Accounting 
    T549Q Payroll Periods 
    T549R Period Parameters 
    T549S Payroll date types 
    T549T Payroll Areas 
    T549M Monthly Assignment: Payroll Period 
    T549N Period Modifiers 
    T549O Text for date modifier 
    T549P Valid Time Units for Payroll Accounting 
    T549Q Payroll Periods 
    T549R Period Parameters 
    T549S Payroll date types 
    T549T Payroll Areas 
    T554S Absence and Attendance Types 
    T554T Absence and Attendance Texts 
    T554V Defaults for Absence Types 
    T554Y Time Constraints in HR TIME 
    T555A Time Types 
    T555B Time Type Designations 
    T559A Working Weeks 
    T559B Name of Working Week 
    T572F Event Texts 
    T572G Allowed Values for Events 
    T572H Event Value Texts 
    T582A Infotypes 
    T582B Infotypes Which Are Created Automatically 
    T582S Infotype Texts 
    T582V Assignment of Infotypes to Views 
    T582W Assigns Infotype View to Primary Infotype 
    T582Z Control Table for PA Time Management 
    T584A Checking Procedures - Infotype Assignment 
    T588A Transaction Codes 
    T588B Infotype Menus 
    T588C Infotype Menus/Info Groups 
    T588D Infogroups for Events 
    T588J Screen Header Definition 
    T588M Infotype Screen Control 
    T588N Screen Modification for Account Assignment Block 
    T588O Screen Modification for Assignment Data 
    T588Q Screen types for fast entry 
    T588R Selection Reports for Fast Data Entry 
    T588S Screen Types for Fast Entry 
    T588T Menu and Infogroup Designations 
    T588V Business object type 
    T588W Event types for infotype operations 
    T588X Cust. composite definition of event types for IT operations 
    T588Z Dynamic Events 
    T591A Subtype Characteristics 
    T591B Time Constraints for Wage Types 
    T591S Subtype Texts 
    T596F HR Subroutines 
    T596G Cumulation wage types 
    T596H _Cumulation wage type texts 
    T596I Calculation rule for cumulation wage types 
    T596U Conversion Table 
    T599B Report Classes 
    T599C Report Classes 
    T599D Report Categories 
    T599F Report Classes - Select Options 
    T777A Building Addresses 
    T777T Infotypes 
    T777Z Infotype Time Constraints 
    T778T Infotypes 
    T778U Subtypes 
    Error Messages tables 
    T100 Messages 
    T100A Message IDs for T100 
    T100C Control of messages by the user 
    T100O Assignment of message to object 
    T100S Configurable system messages 
    T100T Table T100A text 
    T100V Assignment of messages to tables/views 
    T100W Assign Messages to Workflow 
    T100X Error Messages: Supplements

  • SRM 5.0  Exception E:BBP_BUPA:034 -Organizational unit in SUS

    Hello,
    We are in process of upgrade srm 4.0 to srm 5.0 , as configured Plan driven procuremnet with supplier enablement scenario . Connected R/3 (46 c) to SUS  using PI 7.0 . But stuck in problem as no   new vendor replicated in sus from R/3. XML  message processing shows error at SUS system ie ..
    "An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_BUPA:034 -Organizational unit 50000001 does not exist; check entries Programm:"
    while successfully updated existing( working with srm 4.0 since last two years) vendors from same system ,
    pls advise.
    Regards,
    Santosh
    I am came across the organization plan change for srm 5.0. Want to be clarify that is it also applicable for SUS organization for vendors.
    report BBP_XPRA_ORGEH_TO_VENDOR_GROUP
    can any one light on it.
    Message was edited by:
            Santosh Patil

    Hi
    <u>Please read this carefully -></u>
    See the following SAP OSS Notes as well ->
    Note 957851 SRMSUS: Modification in usermanagement for CUA replication
    Note 792364 SRM50/SUS/BP: Conversion of SUS business partner
    Note 628547 SRM-SUS: Corrections for SUS 2.0 SP01: business partner,user
    <b>Report BBP_XPRA_ORGEH_TO_VENDOR_GROUP</b>
    <u>[Convert Org. Units to Vendor Groups ]</u>
    <b>Mode details</b>
    Mode                 Short text                                                                               
    0    Do not carry out structure checks                           
    1    Business partner exists for root org.                       
    2    Partner for root org. (only) has org. unit role             
    3    All level 2 nodes are org. units                            
    4    All level 2 nodes have business partners                    
    5    All level 2 nodes have (only) org. unit role                
    6    All level 3 nodes are org. units                            
    7    All level 3 nodes have business partners                    
    8    All partners (level 3) has (at least) org.unit + bidder role
    9    All level 4 nodes are positions
    <b>Purpose of this report</b>
    This report converts the HR organizational model for external business partners (bidders, vendors, and their employees).
    You have to run this report after an upgrade from BBP 2.0C, EBP 3.0, EBP 3.5, EBP 4.0 and SRM Server 5.0 for every root organizational unit of these external business partners (if you have several such root unit, you have to run the report several times).
    This report does not run across clients, so you have to start it separately in every client that you have.
    The conversion is required because, in the new HR organizational model, external objects can no longer be stored as object 'O' (=organizational unit); consequently, it is no longer possible to create positions for external objects.
    This has the following effects for external business partners who are stored in the organizational model:
    The old root object, the 'Central Organizational Unit for Vendors' will in future not be an organizational unit, but rather an organizational object of the type 'VG' (=vendor group)
    The interim nodes that were created for reasons of system performance (each containing 100 vendors/bidders) will in future not be an organizational unit, but rather an organizational object of the type 'VG' (=vendor group)
    The external business partners of the type Organization (bidders, vendors) are no longer represented by a separate organizational object (in other words, there is no longer an organizational object that has the identity relationship to the partner)
    Since the org. object that previously represented the partners is missing, the business partners are now linked directly with the interim nodes (previously, the organizational unit for the partner, and not the partner itself, was linked)
    If a business partner has a set of attributes that is different to the attribute values specified for the interim node, the partner in question is not linked directly to the interim node, but rather to another 'VG' object (which has the attributes of the partner), which in turn is linked to the interim node.
    Previously, if an external business partner had an employee and this employee has a user in the system, the employee staffed the position in the organizational unit that represented the partner. However, since this organizational unit no longer exists, the position and the staffing relationship no longer exist either. This means, among other things, that there is no reporting option in HR that enables you to navigate from a user to the business partner of the user's company.
    Since there is currently no way of directly assigning a user to a business partner (of the type Person), the organizational object 'CP' (=Central Person) is still used to establish this link.
    Once the conversion report has run successfully, you will no longer be able to see the organizational structure of the external business partners by calling transaction PPOSA_BBP (or PPOMA_BBP).
    However, a new transaction called PPOMV_BBP is available instead. You can use this transaction to display the converted (and newly generated) structure for bidders/vendors.
    Prerequisites
    Before you actually convert your organizational structure, you should let the report check the structure, and correct any errors that the report detects.
    Features
    The report has the following features:
    A 'Check Only' mode is available, which you can use to check the consistency of the organizational structure of the external business partners at different levels
    The report can be restarted. This means if the conversion is canceled due to errors or system problems, and you restart the report, it will recognize any new objects that have already been generated, thus ensuring that structure elements that have already been processed are not converted a second time (this is achieved by evaluating at runtime the log tables BBP_O_TO_VG_OBJ (for generated objects) and BBP_O_TO_VG_REL (for generated relationships)).
    If you use table BBP_MARKETP_INFO to store the root organizational units, the report changes the old entries accordingly.
    The report writes an application log (log object BBP_XPRA_O_TO_VG) in which messages are logged at two different levels; alternatively, you can request that the message be output directly ('WRITE', for background spool lists).
    Although we do not recommend that you do this (because it can result in very long response times), you can run the report in parallel and thus convert several root organizational units at the same time.
    Activities
    Start the report for every 'Central Organizational Unit for Vendors' (root organizational units for external business partners) in every client that you use.
    Annotations
    We recommend that you do not use the 'Direct Message Output' option (that is, the option where an application log is not written) in conjunction with the 'Detailed Message Output' option for larger organizational structures, because every object and relationship that is generated will be output, and you will not feasibly be able to process this list.
    Even if you use it in conjunction with the writing of an application log, the 'Detailed Message Output' option rarely makes sense if you have tens or hundreds of thousands of vendors/bidders.
    Estimated work/expenditure necessary
    The runtime for this report depends on the hardware, system load, and structure involved (for example, the number of vendors/bidders who have employees and users and, therefore, also positions, the number of vendors who have attributes different than those of the interim node, and so on).
    As a rule of thumb, though, structures with vendors where 10% of users have their own individual attributes are processed at the rate of approximately 25,000 per hour.
    Remember, however, that the time required depends to a large degree on the number of nodes where local attributes have been defined, and on the number of business partners who have users.
    This can lead to situations where an organizational structure with 100,000 nodes but no local attributes or users can be converted more quickly that a structure with only 5,000 nodes but with local attributes and assigned users.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Error during organization unit assignment

    Hi All,
    I am workin on SRM 5.0 . I am gettin this error ( organizational unit 000000 is not consistent) when i tried assigning users to the organizational unit. I was able to assign users to org units before (by right clicking on postion and assigning it to a org unit) .any inputs would be appreciated
    Krishna

    Hi Krishna,
    does the user assignment work with using trx USERS_GEN like Ramki suggests?
    I would focus to check the settings in the Org Model;
    Check the Org Unit by calling report BBP_CONSISTENCY_CHECK via trx se38.
    In the selection screen select "Department" and search for the Org Unit Number
    or direcly enter the Org Unit Number giving you the issue. Also select to check all
    applications and have a look on the result. The system will tell you, where attribute
    settings are missing or wrong and you can correct it.
    Also easy elements like missing address information could give that error.
    Thanks,
    Claudia

  • Match code organizational units with tree.

    Hi,
    I've created an input field with a orgeh type context element.
    There a instant solution for attribute a match code like the R3 transaction PP01 for organizational units?
    Thank for answers.

    Hi,
    There is one ready to use Freely Programmable Value help for Org hierarchy shown as a tree in Wiki. Refer to the below link-
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/WDABAP/OrganizationHierarchyinTREEstructureasF4+help
    To know more details on how to use a freely programmable value help refer to the below link -
    [Implement freely programmable value help in Webdynpro ABAP|http://www.divulgesap.com/blog.php?p=NjQ=]
    Cheers,
    Ravikiran

  • Send email to Organization Unit in CRM 2007

    Hello friends,
    At tcode SBWP sapgui, It is possible to send a message to a Org. unit. , receipt type u201CH u2013 Organizational Unitu201D.
    I need at CRM 2007 webui to do the same thing, send message to receipt type u201COrganizational Unitu201D but I could not find this option there.
    I sending email through screen EMAIL in CRM 2007. At that screen I found options only to send message to individual emails from Lotus Notes/OutLook list, or individual user in CRM, but nothing from Organizational Unit.
    My requirement is, at email screen, user must be able to send a message for all user assigned to a Org, so they will select the O.U. and CRM will send message for all users, but we donu2019t want to use Lnotes or Outlook groups, user must select a Organizational Unit.
    Does anybody know if there is a way to do that at CRM 2007 webgui.
    Regards,
    Lalas

    Hi Lalas,
    Users must be able to select which Org. Unit they want to send the message. It is not possible define rules.
    Users must be able to type any text that they want as message text.
    You can pass the org unit to the  workflow and store it in a container element. Then use this element as reciepient type for the send mail step.
    I don't think passing message text in such a way would be desired.
    Then instead of using workflows you can use FM SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1 to send mail to the desired users.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Saumya

  • Retrieve Organizational Unit ID from ECC Purchase organization ID

    hello Experts!
    I am facing an issue. In SRM - given the ID of the Purchase Organization downloaded from ECC, I need to retreieve the related SRM Organizational Unit ID.
    I have found a FM (BBP_CTR_UI_BE_PORG_DETERMINE) that is doing exactly the other way around, but coudln't find a function module / alternative way to satisfy my requirement.
    Doesn anybody have an idea?
    Thanks!

    Hi
    You can retrieve it using table HRV5500A to get the Org. unit ID for the corresponding backend pur org. If you want description of the Org unit then you can use table HRP1000.
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • Organizational unit transfers ,how to deal with the person in it ?

    Hi,All,I need your help!
    if an organizational unit has been transfered to another upper organizational unit ,and there are already persons assigned to different positions of it,so how to deal with this problem?are those person's IT 0000,0001should be changed too?and how to maintain this kind of change?is a personnel action necessary?or there is some other more efficient way for it?

    Hi
    In IT0001 You have a Position which is linked to a Org unit. If you want to change the org units reporting relationship then you have to change it in OM by creating a new relationship with the upper org unit.
    All the person are assigned to position so nothing needs to be done in  PA.
    Reward points if useful.
    Regards

  • Function module for automating creation of organizational unit

    Experts,
    I am using SRM 4.0. In my system R/3 is acting as backend.
    For creation of new organisational unit in SRM, which is not present in SRM but present in R/3 side i have to do the manual activity every time.
    Is there any function module? Which can automate this process. If there is any function module which i can use please let me know. and how can i use that also please let me know.
    By this automation every time through the program the new organization unit should created in SRM side.
    Please let me know..
    Thanks in advance. I will appriciate through rewards points.

    Hi,
    Thanks for your input. But i am planning to send one file for HR records and then from that file through program i will upload the file. IF for some user the orgaisation unit will not be found then there itself it would create the OU through Function module(If Any)... I am doing like this as the HR system is some legacy system not the R/3 system.
    So Please help me to find out  function module.
    i will appeciate for you help.
    Thanks

  • Business partner of organizational unit is not consistent

    Hi,
    Client is on SRM 4.0. When we are trying to search a user in the org structure, and when clicking on "Check" for this user, it was showing fine. But when we are searching any BP in the org strucutre, then immediately the BP name is vanishing against the BP of the user and when doing the "Check" it is showing the below two messages:
    Business Partner of organizational unit XXXXXXX is not consistent
    User cannot be repaired becasue the organizational unit contains errors
    When checking in BBP_CHECK_USRES, the user is not showing as defective. It is green.
    Similarly, the the organizational unit check is also showing as green.
    System is advising to run BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE. When we run this for the org units, these are coming as green.
    Users are able to create the shopping carts and also are able to create confirmations. But the problem is happening for some of the users where the system is not allowing to create shopping basket / confirmation.
    Strange thing is that, when we are searching the user by user id in the org structure, then the check is showing no messages. But if we search the same user using the BP number, then in the check, the messages are coming. And once the messages appear, it is appearing for all the users in the org strucutre even at the root node level.
    Any help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Aswini

    Hi Aswini,
    There are some possibilities to raise these kind of errors messages:                                                                               
    1) User with inconsistent data.                                           
    Please, check the instructions described in the following notes:          
    597475 - Repair users with inconsistent address data                      
    -> use the report B_REPAIR_EBP_USER_2 to make the user consistent.        
    419423 - Repairing incorrect EBP users                                    
    350129 - Creating business partner for organizational unit                                                                               
    When you create the Org Units have you fully completed the address        
    data, e.g post coe, telephone/fax number etc..                            
    If not, please enter a full address, save the data and see if this        
    generates the Business Partner.                                           
    Remember, that you can delete this user and create a new user.                                                                               
    2) Error in the positions after HR replication                                                                               
    Please, implement the following notes and retest the scenario:            
    1056873 -  Incorrect SRM users after HR distribution                      
    1016450 - Replication of persons deletes positions in SRM                                                                               
    After implementing these notes you should send the employee               
    corresponsing to the user in error with his position (using               
    transaction PFAL or report RHALEINI in UPDATE mode for all periods.                                                                               
    3) the user was deleted and a new was created and during these two        
    actions the user opened documents. So, in this case, the new user         
    becomes inconsistent                                                                               
    If the user is deleted from SU01 still the BP and S which is related to   
    that user will be retained (we can see this in PPOMA_BBP) transaction.    
    In this case we can create the user again using SU01 and can be attached  
    with the old 'S' and 'BP'.                                                                               
    2. If the user is completed deleted ie., all relations BP and S.          
    The new user has created.   
    In this case if the new user is corrupted we can delete this                  
    user (since the new user doesn't create any documents so far). But the        
    old documents should refer to the new BP related to the new user.   
    ========================
    Also, another option would be to follow the below instructions
    After applying the notes 1056873 & 1016450, send the employees        
    corresponding to the users in errors with their positions (using              
    transaction PFAL or report RHALEINI in UPDATE mode for all periods,           
    using evaluation path A008) ? If not, please do this and it must repair       
    the SRM users. Please test and give me the feedback.     
    Hope this helps,
    Kind Regards,
    Matthew

  • Business Partner Number in Organizational Unit

    Hi All,
    I am Configuring Organizationla model in CRM 4.0, as we know the system automatically generates a BP of role type of Organizational Unit as soon as we save the Organizational Unit which we created.
    But in my case Partner ID is generating but not Business Partner can you please advice me in this regard?
    I have checked all the number ranges and all.everything is ok but i dont understand what is missing and where? This is Urgent plz.
    It would be great help if you can spare some time in this regard.
    Hopefully waiting for your reply at the earliest.
    Thanks and warm regards,
    Vali.

    It should create a BP of type Org as soon as you add a organization in the Org model.
    Go to Tx  ppoma_crm (Maintain Org Model).
    Create a Org and add other data like address and save it .
    Exit the screen and open the org model again you would see the BP Number under the Business Partner column for the selected Org.You couls also see Code,ID,Valid from,Valid to columns for the organization.
    Take the BP Number and open it through BP transaction.
    Thanks,
    Thirumala.

  • How do I activate the object history for an organizational unit ?

    Dear experts,
    we're using organizational units, positions, persons and users of the
    organizational management (Transactions PPOCE and PPOME) for
    the determination of (possible) agents in our Workflows.
    The objects seem to have an object history, at least you find such an
    option in the "find by" window on the left hand side of the maintenance
    transactions, but in our system there are no entries and I can't figure
    out how to activate history entries to be written.
    Do you ?
    Thanks in advance
    Andreas

    Hi,
    In OM all relation have a validity. I think you mean this with object history.
    If you double click an organizational unit for instance and then open the detail tab (if it wasn't open already)
    there you'll see Valid On with todays date this is the date which is used for determining the organizational structure, also you'll see No Periods with a green square to the left of the text.
    Just above the text Valid On, you'll see a button, when you click on the display periods button you can change the date to see what the relation of the object was at that time.
    You can also search the HR forum for more on organizational management.
    Kind regards, Rob Dielemans

  • Regarding workflow organizational unit

    Hi,
    I have FM SWI_GET_USERS_OF_ORG_UNIT passing some oranizational unit number of the production system which was not there in devlopment server. I am testing in development server now to work the workflow I need to chnage the number to developemnt server organizational unit number. How to find that number.
    thanks,
    Kishore B A

    Hey Shaurya,
    I had gone thru tht link and already got answer as -
    "This addition specifies which selection screen is called. dynnr is a data object that must contain the screen number of a selection screen defined in the called program when the SUBMIT statement is called.
    u2022     If the addition USING SELECTION-SCREEN is omitted or the screen number 1000 is entered, the standard selection screen is called. If no standard selection screen is defined in the called program, no selection screen is called.
    u2022     If a screen number that is not 1000 is entered in the addition USING SELECTION-SCREEN, the corresponding independent selection screen is called. If no selection screen with this screen number is defined in the called program, this leads to an untreatable exception."
    ==========
    But now my query is ....as by writing this code ...report is getting executed directly...ok...
    Can u suggest if there is any possibility of calling the t-code 'RE_RHAKTI00' with 3 values before execution...coz there r also other check boxes and radiobuttons which user will select as per requirement before executing the report.
    Regards
    Nitin

  • How to get the list of organization unit assigned to user

    hello All,
    i have to get the list of organization unit which is assigned to user. i mean if user ABC is assigned to 10 Org unit then how would i get those 10 sales Org? is there Any function module?
    Regards.

    hello Bruno,
    Thanks for reply...i got the Org unit with position...now i need to get territory Id / Areas related to those position's. can u help me in this regard?
    Regards

  • I need a list of all the organizational units, sub organizational units,

    I need a list of all the organizational units, sub organizational
    units,and their security groups which are present in all sub OUs

    Hi,
    There are lots of way to export OU, Sub OU and Security Group.
    1> Open AD console > run query > export with CSV file.
    2> Run “CSVD” command as per your requirement.
    3>Download Manage Engine Software > Install to any computer of Domain member > Set credential for domain controller access > Export the customized information, as per your requirement with XLS, PDF,
    CSV or Ect.
    3rd option is very easy to export customized reports
    Deepak Kotian.
    MCP, MCTS, MCITP Exchange 2010 Ent. Administrator
    Disclaimer:
    Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognizes useful contributions. Thanks!
    All the opinions expressed here is mine. This posting is provided "AS IS"
    with no warranties or guarantees and confers no right

Maybe you are looking for