Organizational Responsibility in SRM 5.00

Hello SRM experts
Apologies if this is an elementary question.
We are setting up purchasers to be responsible for certain categories through the Responsibility tab in PPOMA_BBP. Then we are assigning which locations they are responsible for beneath.
Is it possible that a purchaser can be responsible for categories A, B and C for Organization 1 but only categories A and B for Organization 2, with a completely different purchaser being responsible for category C in Organization 2.
Thanks for your time.
Ian

Hello Serguei
The buyers are already in separate Purch Grps.
I'll try to outline what we currently have in more detail
Purch Grp X
Product Responsibility:
Cat 1
Cat 2
Cat 3
Org Responsibility:
Plant A
Plant B
Purch Grp Y
Product Responsibility:
Cat 3
Org Responsibility:
Plant B
As you can see, a buyer belonging to PG X can purchase for Plant A and B for all categories, with PG Y only allowing to purchase Cat 3 in Plant B. The scenario I am looking to implement would involve PG X being allowed to purchase Cat 1, 2 and 3 for Plant A, but only be responsible for 1 and 2 in Plant B. I don't see how this can be done through PPOMA_BBP responsibility tab as it only seems to allow for all specified categories in all the specified plants.
Thanks
Ian

Similar Messages

Organizational Responsibility in SRM 7.02

Can someone please tell me what the purpose of the Responsibility tab in the SRM 7.02 Organizational Structure? Should the Responsibility tab in SRM 7.02 be used to restrict the Purchasing Group of a Shopping Cart creator?

HI Amy ,
Basically in SRM we cannot achieve the central purchase orgainzation like MM. But, you can follow a kind of workaround as below.
Say, You have two purchase orgainzations 1 and 2 under company A.
Similarly, Another company B has purchase organization 3.Now, you can make purchase orgainzation 3 responsible for purchase organization 1 and 2 as well.
How to achieve that:
Create a purchasing group under Purchase Organization 3 and assign the org units for purchase orgainzation 1 and 2 as well in the responsibilities tab. In this way, the buyers of the purchasing group can do buying for Purchasing org 1 and 2 as well.

Organizational Responsibility for Purchasing Group

Dear all,
we are in SRM 5.0 and I have the following question. We have a very complex organizational structure with a huge amount of purchasing groups. For the moment I fill on tab "Responsibility" the organizational responsibility manually using my own hand
I would like to automize this process with a mass transaction or ECATT but I can not manage to do so with transaction PPOMA_BBP. Is there some other way/transaction to use?
Thanks and regards
AD

Hi. Yes. You can ECATT on transaction PO10 or PP01.
Put in the org unit numbers and maintain the "EBP Product Responsibility" infotype.
It might tell you that you can not do this, but you can enable it by maintaining T777I in SM30.
Regards,
Dave.

Purchase Order Response in SRM 4.0 through XI

Hi Friends
We are working on SRM 4.0. We are sending a PO from SRM to R/3 usng XI in xml format.
Now we want the Purchase Order Response in SRM from R/3 through XI. How can we achieve that?
We have used an RFC receiver Adapter in XI to connect to SRM and we have mapped the ORDRSP IDoc to the PurchaseOrderConfirmation Message Type. But in the Message Monitoring of the RWB we are getting an error:
Exception caught by adapter framework: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: functiontemplate from repository was
Delivery of the message to the application using connection AFW failed, due to: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: functiontemplate from repository was .
How to resolve this?
In which format does this PO response should be sent to SRM and How to send this?
Thanks in Advance....

Hi Chris
Thanks for the Response
But Chris, I have some doubts regarding this.
What is XI proxy Framework?
I think the Proxy Framework consists of the Proxy Generator and the Proxy Runtime. The Proxy Framework for ABAP (generator and runtime) is part of the SAP Web Application Server and no specific installation is needed.
Is the same as XI Framework?
Dont we require any mapping? Because Iam getting the Sales Order details through ORDRSP IDoc fron the Vendor. So in order to transfer the data to SRM I require the mapping.
Please Respond Immediately....
Thanks in Advance...

Purchase Order Response in SRM 4.0

Hi Friends
We are working on SRM 4.0. We are sending a PO from SRM to R/3 usng XI in xml format.
Now we want the Purchase Order Response in SRM from R/3 through XI. How can we achieve that?
We have used an RFC receiver Adapter in XI to connect to SRM and we have mapped the ORDRSP IDoc to the PurchaseOrderConfirmation Message Type. But in the Message Monitoring of the RWB we are getting an error:
Exception caught by adapter framework: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: functiontemplate from repository was
Delivery of the message to the application using connection AFW failed, due to: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: functiontemplate from repository was .
How to resolve this?
In which format does this PO response should be sent to SRM and How to send this?
Thanks in Advance....

in pre-XI times in order to Acknowledge IDocs you used ALEAUD which is an incoming IDoc to the sending SAP system that collects all the received idocs in the receiving system and sends there processing status to the sending system.
Problem is that this IDoc can only be generated on a job schedule.
This is a shot in the dark but Maybe you can try to find this IDoc on the XI side and map to it the RFC response,
this way you'll acknowledge the IDoc that basically were send to xi from the sending system.
Why not using Sending Idoc on R\3, Recieving IDoc on SRM,sending ALEAUD from SRM to R3 all through xi???

How to find Organizational Responsibility for PGRP

Hello,
In structure pposa_bbp, I want to find the link between the purchasing group and the "Organizational Responsibility" in tab Responsibility just below the Product category responsibility.
I can"t find any table oy function module to help me.
DO you know how can I got those data?
Thanks,

are you looking this
user and product category responsible
BBP_GET_CATEGORIES_F4
br
muthu

Changing organizational structure in SRM

Hi All,
We are in production with SRM 4.0 since 1.1.2006 and using R/3 since 2003.
Our company intends to change the organizational structure (delete, merge, move
organizational structure).
We are going to copy our PROD systems (both R/3 and SRM) to other systems to be able to apply and check the changes.
Problems:
1. How is it possible to replace LogsysXXX to that of the new backend for each attribute in the organizational structure, for every organizational unit? The attributes are not inherited data because they differ from one another, and there are many of them within the org structure (for example the attributes plant, purchasing org and group have the LogsysXXX defined as part of the parameter. There are about 600 users with 50 attributes each in all the org structure; therefore a manual process would not be acceptable.
Note: We didnt copy the HR organization to the SRM org structure.
2. Documents which are being processed and at the time of copy client and were already created in SRM (PO, POR, SC), point to the old backend (LogsysXXX).
How do we change this pointer in existing documents to the new backend system?
Best regards,
Rami

Hi Rami,
Please check former post :
Re: Logical system name to be updated while client copy--URGENT HELP REQUIRED
Re: Exact copy of SRM PRD to DEV ? :-(
Kind regards,
Yann

PO Response in SRM 7.0

Hi experts
I am usisng SRM 7.0, ECS and I have a EBP-SUS where I sent purhase orders to vendors, and it sends PO rensponse, all is working and the Po resposnse is created my problem is I want to use the worhflow WS14500001 to auto tranfer PO response to PO if the tolerance check is ok, The problem is I am usisng Process Controled Workflow, and is not possible in PCW, how it could be done, I activated the task in SWETYV but no workflow is started.
sds
Javier

Hi Javier,
It looks like you have enabled PCW. In fact if you enable PCW you can't track back to ACW.
Now in your case you create expression & select specific task id to auto transfer PO response; for that contact Workflow/ABAP consultant.
Regards,
yaniVy
Reward points if helps.

Issue with PO Response in SRM 7.0

Hi Experts,
We have upgraded our system from SRM 4.0 to 7.0. Post upgrade we are facing an issue with PO Response document.
Scenario:
When the PO is ordred, Vendor sends a the PO response through XML. Our middleware call the an FM which uses BBP_PD_POC_CREATE to create the PO response(BUS2209) with acceptance status.
Problem:
The status of the PO response is always + In Process+. But in SRM 4,0 we are having the responce with accepted status.
Could you please throw somw light on this.
Thanks in Advance,
Vishnu Reddy

There is this note that might help you.
Note 1393346 - PCO:Header status is open, even all items in PCO accepted
Although a relatively new note, this note is only relevant for SRM5.0 at the moment. What I'd suggest you do is to (temporarily) modify the standard code (in your development or test system) based on the correction instruction of this note. If it resolves your problem, create an OSS mesasge to SAP and ask them to upport the note to SRM7.0. Then you could reverse your modification back to standard and apply the note officially.

SRM Purchase Order Response in SRM 7.0

In SRM 7.0 is there a transaction where a purchase order response to can be entered manually for purchase order or loaded from a spreadsheet? Or does a purchase order response always require XI?
Regards,
-Paul Trauth

Hi Paul,
We have to use the SRM portal for all kind of purchase order processing like creation, updation etc,. Can you be more precise in your question, so then we can answer from our side.
Thanks,
Nastera

Purchase Order Response in SRM from R/3 through XI

Hello friends,
While sending Purchase Order Response from R/3 to SRm through XI Iam getting this error in SXMB_MONI of XI and also in SRM:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="ABAP">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText><?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><nr1:StandardMessageFault xmlns:nr1="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global"><standard><faultText>An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_PD:069 -Product data could not be intepreted E:BS:013 -System status INCM is active (Purchase Order Response 1000000037) Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57</faultText></standard></nr1:StandardMessageFault></SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">StandardMessageFault</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage>
<SAP:Stack>The application triggered an exception</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
can anyone please help me out in this...........
Thanks in Advance...

Dear Friends,
I am SAP MM Certified Consultant & did my training for MM Module from Siemens ( Sapient College )& paid 2.5 lac for that and Since then I am working as a SAP MM consultant in an MNC since past 2 years, done 2 implementations and had a functional experience of 4 years in purchasing .
Had work for MNCs only & having good expertise in Domain area .Total Experience 5 years out of that 2 years SAP MM experience .
Dear all can you tell me what should i do so as to make a successful career in SRM.? How long should i stay in MM and what should I learn besides MM.I have already started working on SRM .
I wish to do SRM training again from Siemens but this point of time , I dont have enough money to do SRM training from Siemens . Could anyone suggest , where I can learn SRM in Bangalore & get trained in this New thing and do i need some programming knowledge in it.
Could anybody send me some SRM documentation on my mail id [email protected]
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Savita Munshi

Purchase Order Response in SRM 4.0 from R/3 through XI

Hello Friends
Iam using XI Receiver Adapter in the communication channel between XI and SRM. Iam mapping ORDRSP IDoc coming from R/3 with "PurchaseOrderConfirmation" message type. Iam using the target interface as "PurchaseOrderConfirmation_In" (which I have taken from the SAP SRM SERVER which I loaded in Repository) in the Interface mapping.
I could see the message in the SXMB_MONI of SRM with a red flag. and the error says:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIProxy</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="ABAP">PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Error during XML => ABAP conversion (; error ID: ; ( )) PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA Error during XML => ABAP conversion (Request Message; error ID: CX_ST_GROUP_MISSING_CASE; (/1SAI/TXS00000000000000000004 XML Bytepos.: 198 XML Path: nr1:PurchaseOrderConfirmation(1) Error Text: Element 'MessageHeader' fehlt)) Error during XML => ABAP conversion (Request Message; error ID: CX_ST_GROUP_MISSING_CASE; (/1SAI/TXS00000000000000000004 XML Bytepos.: 198 XML Path: nr1:PurchaseOrderConfirmation(1) Error Text: Element 'MessageHeader' fehlt)) Element 'MessageHeader' fehlt</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
And also I do not see any Payload for XML Message -> Response, in the SXMB_MONI of XI.
What could be the Problem?
Please Respond Immediately....
Thanks in Advance....

Hi,
Have you tested your Message Mapping? Looking at your error that is what sounds like the error. Either the cardinality has an issue or a probably and extra tag somewhere in your XML.
Regards
Ravi
Note : Please reward the posts that help you.

Sending PO Response to SRM

Hi friends,
I Am Working on a scenario where I want to insert PO Response automatically in SRM (EBP). I am sending Sales Order details from vendor R/3, through XI using ORDRSP05 Idoc.
This Idoc is mapped to PurchaseOrderConfirmation_In Interface & sent to SRM.
In SRM this XML message is received but with following trace:
<FAULT_TEXT>An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_PD:069 -Product data could not be intepreted E:BS:013 -System status INCM is active (Purchase Order Response 1000000059)
Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP;
Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57 </FAULT_TEXT>
I am stuck up on this error for 2-3 days, If any one has any idea what so ever to solve this error, then please tell me.
Hope some one help me out to solve this.
Thanking You In Advance.
Regards,
Nitin.

Hi Nitin,
Did you ever figure this issue out?
We are running into a similar problem. We get the following error:
<STANDARD>
<CONTROLLER />
<FAULT_TEXT>An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredA:BBP_PD:004 -Partner 0000003100 not found E:BBP_PD:147 -Enter a country for partner 0000003100 with type 'Sold-to Party' I:TAX_TXJCD:105 -You are not allowed to enter a tax jurisdiction code for country US W:BBP_PD:649 -Delvery date is in the past; check the entry Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57</FAULT_TEXT>
<FAULT_URL />
<FAULT_DETAIL />
</STANDARD>
We have defined 3100 as the Company code in SRM and R/3. We have also defined the correlation between QA2CLNT220 (logical system), QA2_220 (business system), and Partner 3100. So we are not sure why SRM complains that "Partner 0000003100 not found". Do we need to define this link between QA2CLNT220 and partner id 3100 somewhere else?
Regards,
Jay

Setting oracle apps appscontext (user/organization/responsibility) in ODI

Hi All - Is there anyway we can setup appscontext (used in oracle applications/ebs suite) (user id/organization id/responsibility) before executing any stored procedures from ODI. This can be achieved in BPEL. We can set these as properties for oracle apps adapter (in BPEL) which will inturn execute our stored procedures. How do we achieve this in ODI?
Thanks!

Hi,
I found this in my notes:
To set the ORG_ID (Business Group) in a SQL*Plus session, use the following anonymous PL/SQL block:
BEGIN
fnd_client_info.set_org_context('<ORG_ID>'); --ORG_ID for Business Group ID
END;
or even simpler:
exec dbms_application_info.set_client_info('<ORG_ID>'); --ORG_ID for Business Group ID
I remember using it in order to be able to query on some Views that don't display any record, as they are based on the Business Group you are logged to. Once I used the EXEC.... command in SQL*Plus, the view displayed the corresponding information.
Try researching if package DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO could be used to set the ORGANIZATION_ID (to identify the Organization or Plant). Note that ORGANIZATION_ID is different than ORG_ID (ORG_ID is used to identify the Business Group).
Hope this helps.
By the way, please reply back with what you find and tell us if it worked and how you used it.
Regards,
Ramon

Purchasing group -- Organizational responsibility

Hello,
We are trying to create a report(BDC) to attach purchasing group to purch org.
In the Flat file we would be entering the basic data, address, function and responsibity.
But for reponsiblity we are able to find only the product category responsibility( trxn PP01).. we are not able to find organizational responsiblity field in the same because of which that cannot be updated.
Please help in this issue
Regards
J

Hi. Yes. You can ECATT on transaction PO10 or PP01.
Put in the org unit numbers and maintain the "EBP Product Responsibility" infotype.
It might tell you that you can not do this, but you can enable it by maintaining T777I in SM30.
Regards,
Dave.

Organizational Responsibility in SRM 5.00

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for