Organizational structure(org unit , position etc)

Dear friends ,
I hope all are doing gr8.
i just created my org structure using PPOC_OLD for the HR purpose.
I hope , i can view this in PPOSE.
but in my case i cant do it.
Im in to gr8 dilemma , is PPOC_OLD suits for HR.
But PPOC_OLD is amazing to work.
Can any1 clear this out.
cheers
sakthi

Hai..
yes u can view it

Similar Messages

Unable to create masterdata ( org Units, Position )etc.

Hi
While creating the masterdata(Position, Org Units) in development client, I am getting an error "Client 220 has status 'not modifiable'". I have tried through scc4 and se06, but it will make complete client as modifiable. I want the configuration part as not modifiable, only it should allow to create the masterdata ( using T codes PO13, PO10 etc.).
Please suggest
Regards
Anup

Hello Anup,
Check transaction code: OOCR "TRSP CORR should be 'X' then go to SCC4 tcode and select radio button 'No Change allowed'
and also ask your Basis team to apply SAP NOTE: 0000163897
hope it help u...
regards

OM - Multiple Cost Centres link with Org Unit/Position not to employee

Hello gurus,
In OM there can only be one relationship at a time between an organizational unit and cost centre (A011). For those areas where there is a requirement for the position to have control over more than one cost centre, there are multiple options.
Option 1 - If only one of the cost centres is used for employee cost incurrence, this should be the main cost centre, and the others controlled through authorizations.
Option 2 - If more than one cost centre is used for employee cost incurrence, a subordinate organizational unit is created into which those positions are placed. In this scenario, the subordinate organizational units would not have a chief, and the reporting structure would go up to the more senior organizational units.
Option 3 - Use Cost centre distribution infotype 1018 (A014)
My question: is there a standard way through which we can show multiple cost centres attached to a position/org unit such that cost incurred by employees goes to master cost centre attached to org unit or positon and other cost centres are just attached to position/orgunit (just to show the org unit/position is managing these other cost centres as well).
Any thoughts? Anybody has used Enterprise Organization in CO to achieve this?
Regards,
Ahmad

To capture more than 1 cost center, you have to specify them in IT-1018 but employee's cost will be split based on this.
For data maintanance alone cost distribution is not possible (based on my knowledge).
May be equivalent custom infotype similar to 1018 @ Postiion / Org Unit level may work.
along with Master Cost center.

Org Mgmt Report with Org Unit, Position, Person and Chef Position

Does anyone know a good report that shows an org structure with Org Unit, positions, person, and also highlights the chef positions?
I would like to link this to our portal, so would prefer a report to transaction PPOME.
Thanks,
Dianna

Hi,
You can generate the required report from reporting tool HIS. select the org structure for which you want the report to be generated.
In the graphical view select the org unit and in the reporting window select organizational plan and select staff assignment as task function.

Reassignment to new Org.Unit & Position

Hello Everyone,
I have a requirement to reassign a Business Partner (Associated with Central Person) to a new org.unit & a new position in the organizational Model. This should be done using a FM. I would like to know if there are any FM's which can be used to reassign a BP from one Org.Unit to Different Org.Unit and a differént position.
I am able to create the relationship using FM *OM_CREATE_RELATION_WITH_DIALOG*. But relationship has to be reassigned to different org.unit & position. Let me know if any one you can help me with.
Best Regards,
Prabahar

Hi,
You can generate the required report from reporting tool HIS. select the org structure for which you want the report to be generated.
In the graphical view select the org unit and in the reporting window select organizational plan and select staff assignment as task function.

Nakisa Org Chart Version 3.0 - Org Unit Position Statistics

Hi All,
Just a quick question, I am currently at a client site where org unit position statistics is always coming back with 0 for occupied and vacation positions.
There are clearly employees assigned to position in the org structure, but I am thinking it may be related to the work percentage on teh A008 relationship between the position and the person.
Can anyone confirm this or give some insight on why we could be getting zeros.
We are currently researching the authorizations to rule that out.
thanks.
JB

Hi Jamie,
I hope you are well. I assume you mean the OrgUnit Hierarchy > FTE View? For the OrgUnit FTE view, the data is calculated by counting all the Positions:
Occupied Positions: where Position has active Person assigned (defined by S A 008 P relationship and PA0000-STAT2 = 3 for related Person)
Vacant Positions: where Position has no active Person assigned (defined by S A 008 P relationship and PA0000-STAT2 = 3 for related Person)
However, this data element (Position_View_Element_Live.xml) uses the BAPI_SAP_NakisaRfcProcessor_PositionVacancyCount_Live class instead of a NakisaRFC Chart class but it does reference the SAPOrgUnitChart_Position NakisaRFC function. It might be that this class alter the output of the NakisaRFC Chart function.
Does that help?
Best regards,
Luke

HR report/tranzaction on current and past org unit, position, job

Hi,
Does anyone know the code of the standard report / tranzaction to show the current and the past org unit, position and job for an employee?
Thank you
Adriana

Hi Adriana!
Please try using Headcount Changes report S_L9C_94000095.
Regards!
Woody.

HR Data Synchronization (Org Unit, Position and Employee) to SRM

Hi All Expert,
Currently, I had replicate the HR data (Org Unit, Position and Employee) to SRM thru transaction PFAL.
Each time there is a new position or new employee, I have to run PFAL and run manually by include the new position number or new employee into the program to replicate to SRM.
Does SAP have any specifiy program or step which I have follow to allow such automation? Is there any variant that I could set?
How to trigger the new Org units which are created in HR to replicate to SRM without any manual input into selection field of Object ID during running the PFAL?
We are trying to achieve automation of synchronization between changes/new creation in HR to replicate to SRM.
Thank for your help.
Paul

Hello Paul,
Below notes will surely help you..
1.The composite note for the process is 390380 - HR/ALE distribution in EBP/SRM.
2.The initial description of the process can be found in note 312090 - Integration HR -
EBP/SRM.
Thanks & Regards
Arshad

Naming convention of Org Units, Position

What is the naming convention used for Org Units, Positions, Jobs and other OM objects. Pls send document if any of you have.
Max points promised!

Namming conventions are made based on the company strategry. That means it varies from one organisation to another. I can find one convention which is availabe in net.
http://www.jhu.edu/hopkinsone/Secure_Private/Library/Blueprint/HumanResources_Sect9_18.pdf#search=%22sap%20hr%20Org%20Units%20Jobs%20Positions%20naming%20conventions%22
~thomas

Best Practice - Changing description for Org Unit/Position or creating new?

Hello Freinds,
I just want to know from your experience what's normally practiced in your implementations for OM :-
For scenarios where there is a need to change the description of a particular org unit or position, do u
1. just change the description effective a particular date (to maintain history) or
2. put an end date to those objects and create new ones ?
Solution 1 is quick and easy, but in IT0001 the description displayed is as on start date of that infotype which is normally a date prior to the change in desc of those objects. As a result this infotype keeps displaying old description.
Is there any way to change this display to show the current description instead of the description as on start date of this infotype ???
Solution 2 calls for a lot of related activities, say if i create a new org unit and delemit the old one - then i have to move all the sub org units and positions into this new one ... which is quite time consuming and doesn't really seem practical.
How do u manage such scenarios ?
Thanks
Allen

We use option #1, although I am not sure this is best practice. Using option 1 for positions makes it challenging when it comes to reporting on length of time in position. We frequently have the scenario where a person is reorged not because they applied for another position, but just because the big wigs want to move around the chess pieces. In these cases we simply modify the position attributes and then run a PA action. Then if you run a query and use the standard delivered Length of time in position field, it appears as if the person has been in the same position for years (which they have), but their position has been retitled, re-graded, and re-orged numerous times. This makes it very difficult to get to an employee's length of time in their role.
This is a great discussion question I hope more people respond with what they do and why.

Auto determination of Service Organization and Org.Unit

Hello
I've created an Org.Model with Org.Units. I've also configured a rule to derive the service organization and the responsible Org Unit based on the activity reason.
When i manually specify the activity reason in the transaction, both service org and org. unit are not automatically derived. As a result I have to manually specify them.
What am I missing here?
Your help is greatly appreciated

header level
spro-> crm->MD.,->org mang.,->org data determination->change rules and profiles ->assign org data profile to transaction type .
add ur profile under org data prifle for ur transaction profile .
item level
spro-> crm->MD.,->org mang.,->org data determination->change rules and profiles ->assign org data profile to item .

Transport org. unit & position to another system

Hi,
I modified some org. units and positions in development and system did not ask for a transport request. How can I move my objects into test system ??

Jorge hi;
With tcode RE_RHMOVE30 you can create a request and transport them.
All you have to do is to choose the plan version, object types, objects. If you want all relations to be transported you can write A* in field evaluation path but if you want you can transport specific relations.
Select transport objects box.
In field task you can press f4 and then you can create a new request for the transport. After this press F8.
There will be a new screen. In this screen select the objects to be transported and then press F8.
After that you will release the request and transport it to the other system via using se09 and stms.
Regards;
Okan
Edited by: Okan Caliskan on Oct 4, 2011 1:58 PM

Creating Organizational Structure of an Organization

Hi All,
I have a requirement of creating the Entire organizational structure right from the root org to the lower lever of employees. N number or org units, positions etc needs to be created and the relationships also to be maintained. I think this cannot be done manually. How can I proceed? Either writing a BDC or LSMW to upload? Or is there any other easy method to do.
Awaiting your reply,
Balaji

Check these links for LSMW -
lsmw
LSMW??
How about trying PP02 for LSMW else use PO13.
Regards,
Amit
reward all helpful replies.

Create/Maintain Organizational Structure in Dual Language

Dear All,
We have a requirement to maintain organizational Structure in two different language. I have created organizational structure in english but when I am trying to upload the same in another language it overwrites previous organizational object data maintained in english.
I believe we can maintain organizational objects (Org. unit, Position) in two different language with same organizational object no. (Org. unit, Position unit No.).
Points will be rewarded for prompt and correct answer.
Regards,
Anand

Have a look at report RHTRANS0

OM - Moving Org Unit don't change relat 002 between my Position

Hi,
I have a problem with my OM system,
I have five org unit (A B C D E) everyone with one position head of own organizational unit, a b c d e.
this is my hierarchy
A
(a)
     B
      (b)
          C
           (c)
     D
      (d)
          E
           (e)
I have this relat in HRP1001
Org Unit     Positions
A 002 B     a 002 b
A 002 D     a 002 d
B 002 C     b 002 c
D 002 E     d 002 e
I'm moving (with ppome transaction) org unit C with its position c, under org unit D.
A
(a)
     B
      (b)
     D
      (d)
          E
           (e)
          C
           (c)
After the moving in HRP1001, relationship between org unit has changed B 002 C (is delimited) D 002 C (is new).
But, I don't have relationship between Position d and c (d 002 c), and relationship between position b and c (b 002 c ) is still valid!!!
Org Unit     Positions
A 002 B     a 002 b
A 002 D     a 002 d
D 002 C     b 002 c d 002 c
D 002 E     d 002 e
Could someone help me?
regards
Fede

Hi Frederica,
if I understand your problem correctly, I'm afraid there is a major design flaw in your OM.
You have an Org-hierrchy with leader positions assigned to each orgunit and the "normal"positions also assigned to those orgunits. This is absolutely sufficient for the system to know, who is reporting to whom and standard reports, evaluation paths, structural auth., workflows all can be set up to work with this correctly. And this is best practise.
BUT you also seem to be using a position hierarchy in parallel. A position hierarchy is really only meant to be a quick and chaep alternative for an Org hierarchy, if you don't want to create orgunits. There is no new information in there. It's completely redundant. And your problem is proof for why this redundancy is damaging: you get inconsitencies.
I"ve seen this before. Whilst their might be good resons for it (I"ve never seen one), thsi is usually done by consultants, who don't understand orgmanegement or do understand that what they are doing is wrong, but rather have teh customer do double manual work with almost guaranteed inconsistencies than make an effort to properly understand struc. authorisations, reports or workflows. If you have no clue about OM, the extra position hierarchy can make some things easier.
So, my recommendation is:
1) check our, where the position hierarchy is used for reporting, workflow, authorisations or other things in your system
2) replace this by the org hierarchy
3) delete the position hierrchy (i.e. the 002 relationships between positions)

Organizational structure(org unit , position etc)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for