Organizer File Size

The Organizer is not displaying some of my pictures. Says "File size is too large", but the picture is only 9.3 mb.  I need to view the picture(s) and call them up to edit etc. Can anyone help?

There exists a limit to display the thumbnails of images in Organizer. Till PSE10, the limit was 54 megapixels. In PSE11, the limit has been increased to 72 megapixels.
You may read the article which can help you increase the maximum limit.
Let me know if that helps!
Regards,
vaishali

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop Elements 8 - Organizer - File size too large

    I have a new computer running Windows 7 with gobs of RAM and hard drive space.  I’ve recently installed Photoshop Elements 8.
    I am having the following problem in the Organizer for some 35MM slides that I’ve scanned at 1600DPI.  It looks like the pixel size in one example is 9590x6013 = 57,664,670.  Based on some reading on the internet it appears that the standard limit in Organizer is 54 megapixels (56,623,104 pixels).  Looking over all of my slides I think I will need around 62-65,000,000.
    I found an Adobe TechNote, http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/402/kb402760.html, that seems to address this issue for earlier versions.  I’ve tried a few times with no luck to follow these notes but there are some differences in my Registry as I’ve noted below in steps 4&5 of the instructions. 
    I’ve restarted both my computer and Photoshop Elements after making the registry change with no change in the Organizer message.  I’ve removed the pictures from the catalog and added them back with no change.  They look fine in the Editor.  The pictures also look fine in all Windows tumbnails.
    The following instructions are copied from the TechNotes.  I’ve made two comments in Red where I was a little unsure since my Registry after install of version 8 does not exactly match these version 5&6 notes.
    Some instructions I found on your website
    To override the maximum image size limit for the Organizer:
    Exit the Organizer.
    Choose Start > Run.
    Type regedit in the Open field and click OK.
    In the left pane, navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ADOBE\Photoshop Elements\5.0 for Photoshop Elements 5.0 and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ADOBE\Photoshop Elements\6.0 for Photoshop Elements 6.0.  Notice that my Adobe is not under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE it is under HKEY_CURRENT_USER.
    Highlight the Organizer folder in the left pane.
    I’ve noticed that I have two “Organizer” folders under the Adobe registry.
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Adobe/Elements Organizer/8.0
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Adobe/Photoshop Elements/8.0/Organizer 
    Thus far, I’ve only tried this DWORD in the second option.
    Choose Edit > New > DWORD Value, and name the new value MaxImageSize.
    Highlight the MaxImageSize DWORD and choose Edit > Modify.
    Change the Base option to Decimal.
    In the Value Data field, enter the new maximum size for an image in pixels. For example, if you want to change the limit to 24 megapixels, then enter 25165824. (To determine a megapixel value in pixels, multiply the value by 1024 x 1024.) If there is a specific image size you are trying to import, then use the this forumula: width x height x 1024 x 1024.
    Click OK.
    Exit the registry.
    Start the Organizer. If you had previously imported images that were over the limit, then delete them from the catalog and re-import them to display the thumbnail.
    Thanks,  Tom

    Hi Tom,
    I'm having the sampe problem.  Did you ever resolve this issue?

  • [BUG ?] PSE Organizer - Sort by file size

    Hello,
    When trying to sort by file size with PSE Organizer, it only takes into account the recently imported pictures.
    I have recently migrated my catalog from PhotoShop Album V1.0 to PSE Organizer without problem (or at least I solve all of them, thanks to John !).
    Now, when I ask all pictures with a file size higher than 2000 kb, I only have the files that I recently imported... Is there any solution to also include all pictures (I paid attention not to select the recent album, I show all pictures - but maybe I do something else wrong ??)
    Thanks,
    Kamayana

    johnrellis wrote:
    Interesting.  When you do Edit > Update Thumbnail, PSE rereads all the metadata from the file except for keyword tags. So your hypothesis that the file size information was not converted from the PSA catalog sounds reasonable.  Just one of many bugs in the conversion process.
    Yes, EDIT > UPDATE THUMBNAIL, that's what I done (sorry, I am french and I downloaded the french version, so my translation are sometimes erroneous).
    Anyway, it solve my problem, thanks to you for helping me, you finally helped me to be curious and to search the problem.
    Kamayana

  • Scanning Negatives - File Size Error

    I receive the error that follows while scanning negatives:
    "Failed to obtain files from the device. The files size exceeds the maximum size allowed..."
    What is PSE maximum size for scanned images.

    Hi Dave,
    This is quite strange. There is as such no limit to the size of the scanned image.
    To isolate the problem, can you please try this?
    1. Scan the negative using Windows Camera and Scanner Wizard.
    2. Drag and drop the scanned image onto Organizer.
    Do you still get the same error?
    Thanks/Tarun

  • Reducing pages file size

    Hi,
    I've googled around on the question of pages having large file sizes, but the discussion centres around documents that have images. I'm wondering if anyone knows why an identical text only document saved in Pages is so much larger than say one saved in MS Word or Neoffice.
    e.g. on an identical 2 page document :-
    1. Just save as Pages document = 225kb
    2. Untick the "Include preview page" box in save menu & it is reduced to 131kb
    3. Save copy as Word document & it is the more familiar 41kb size.
    Are there any other settings to reduce the size of a simple text document down to something comparable to Word. I realise I'm talking about small size examples, but if I start saving 100's of files that are 20 or 30 pages in size, it all starts to add up.
    thanks,
    Terry

    An other explanation may be the way Pages store characters.
    Most of the characters available in the old ASCII set are stored as is using a single byte.
    Some of them "&" for instance are stored as a descriptive string requiring several bytes.
    & is stored as &
    Every other characters require six to eight bytes.
    é is stored as é
    œ is stored as œ
    ᴂ is stored as ᴂ
    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 21 août 2011 12:35:22
    iMac 21”5, i7, 2.8 GHz, 4 Gbytes, 1 Tbytes, mac OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.0
    My iDisk is : <http://public.me.com/koenigyvan>
    Please : Search for questions similar to your own before submitting them to the community
    To be the AW6 successor, iWork MUST integrate a TRUE DB, not a list organizer !

  • Reducing Pages file size on iPad

    I produce a 12 page newsletter comprising text/photo mix for a charity.  Unfortunately the file size saved as PDF was almost 20mb which seemed enormous for the content involved.  I put the photos through a file size reducer and reimported them but this saved only 4mb.  I can't email the document to the majority of subscribers as its so big.  How can I urgently and drastically  reduce the file size on an iPad so I can send it.?

    An other explanation may be the way Pages store characters.
    Most of the characters available in the old ASCII set are stored as is using a single byte.
    Some of them "&" for instance are stored as a descriptive string requiring several bytes.
    & is stored as &amp;
    Every other characters require six to eight bytes.
    é is stored as &#xE9;
    œ is stored as &#x153;
    ᴂ is stored as &#x1D02;
    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 21 août 2011 12:35:22
    iMac 21”5, i7, 2.8 GHz, 4 Gbytes, 1 Tbytes, mac OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.0
    My iDisk is : <http://public.me.com/koenigyvan>
    Please : Search for questions similar to your own before submitting them to the community
    To be the AW6 successor, iWork MUST integrate a TRUE DB, not a list organizer !

  • Show file size in Cell Extras? (Either Compact or Expanded, or anywhere in Grid for multiple images simultaneously)

    I've searched and seen several suggestions saying to change Metadata to Exif & IPTC to see the file size, but that's for only one image at a time. Under Cell Extras (both Compact and Expanded) I see options for Megapixeps, Cropped Dimensions, File Name, Extention, and a bunch of other options, but no file size. I suspect this is because file size isn't a metadata field and simply a file attribute (that may be incorrect, but regardless...) is there really no way to have file size visible in the thumbnail cells in Grid view in the Library? I'm trying to reduce redundancy and viewing file size of multiple images at a glance based on my Library Filter criteria would be a huge help. Thanks to anyone who can help sort me out!

    Sure. I have a catalog with 22,000 images indiscriminately imported from hundreds of folders and multiple drives from this year alone (partially lost a RAID array to a corrupt index and recovered a dump of the files so I'm terribly disorganized juggling emergency redundancy backups wherever I had 50 gigs here, 100 gigs there, and working to clean up and organize my photos one year at a time ), including raw, jpg, websized jpg, png, tiff and psd (flattened and with layers/adjustments) and am now trying to identify my keepers and delete unnecessary files. I have 22 terabytes of personal files and photography spread chaotically and while I now have proper discipline when saving variants, I didn't always and want to remove unneeded, rejected, and duplicate images. I don't expect to be caught up for months or longer depending on my free time and sanity. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as keep the raw delete the rest. Sometimes I have multiple PSD documents with different version names and edits, sometimes with multiple layers, and I have to use a variety of information to identify which one is indeed the correct one to keep...or open them all/both.
    Often, file size can be an indicator for me and aids in making the decision more quickly. For instance between 2 psd files with the same Megapixles I'm often able to identify the flattened version vs the layers intact version by file size if it wasn't properly noted in the filename, which unfortunately due to a combination of bad or evolving practices and being tired or rushed happens more often than I'd like to admit. One I just came across that brought me here searching was 3 similarly named and appearing PSD files of a panorama, all with the same MP/dimensions. One was flattened, one was the original stitch, and one was flattened with a few masks, adjustments, and an extra layer, and being the one I'd want to keep. Filesize helped me quickly identify which was which. Also sometimes dimensions are misleading, like when a panorama is first created and uncropped, its dimensions are larger, but a tighter cropped image with multiple layers and a larger file size indicates to me that it is newer and more finished, even though smaller dimensions typically indicates a crop and may not be a 'master' copy. Additionally, 2 images with different names but the exact same file size are very likely duplicates (at least in my workflow) but 2 similarly looking images with the same dimensions could be retouched/not, sharpened/not, have noise reduction/not, and I'd have to view them in detail to determine if they were in fact identical. For my purposes (since these are my personal fine art images & I have the raw files incase I occasionally mess up) I'm often willing to trade an educated guess for my time. Seeing identical file sizes on 2 apparently similar images is good enough for me to delete one.
    I can select them individually and check...it's not a horrific problem. But it would save me time so I was hoping I had simply missed how to view that. My reasoning is 'why not' have the option available with all the others? Me personally, I don't care about megapixels when I already have the dimensions, that's just redundant and honestly much less helpful than LxW. File size would be an additional tool I would use, though. There are other examples but the main thing is that I do spend time checking filesize, and specifically when comparing multiple images, so having it displayed in the cell would be a time saver for me.

  • Save of edited file does not change file size correctly

    I have QT pro 7.6 and have all the latest DirectX and drivers for my PC. I have a problem with file size reporting correctly for edited files.
    For example, I have three files: A.MOV (10mb), B.MOV (15mb), and C.MOV (25mb). If I load A and then copy B and C to the end of it, I can do a File Save As to create D.MOV as a self contained movie which shows estimated size as 50mb. And the saved file IS 50mb.
    However, If (after appending B and C to the end of A) I just do a "Save" command, A.MOV file size is not changed and still shows 10mb. The whole movie A-B-C plays correctly, but the file size is incorrect. Where is the rest of the data? I know the new A.MOV is self contained because I can delete B and C and it still plays all three segments. I'm concerned that if the file size is reported incorrectly there is the chance that the data will get lost in a future copy or move operation. Does anyone else experience this bug or is it just something in my PC?

    I stopped following this issue a few years ago, but as I recall, this is a known bug in the way PSE handles the writing of the tags to the photo files.
    I stopped following this issue because I switched to Lightroom which does not have this issue. Yes, you could do this with Exiftool and re-save the metadata from PSE, seems kind of cumbersome.
    Also, please note that if you Export the file from the PSE Organizer, as far as I know the proper tags should appear, so if you want the proper tags in your files, you could use this feature.

  • File size for Show & Share

    Hi all.
    We have a SnS system version 5.2. When we try to upload a video larger than 2 Gig we get that the file is to large to upload. But in the documentation I have read that there is no limitation to the file size, but obviously this is not correct. So the qestion is if there are some parameters that can be edited to change the maximum file size to uploaded?

    Hello,
    This is a known limitation referenced in the Release notes for DMS 5.2.1.
    Release Notes for Cisco Digital Media Suite 5.2.x
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/video/digital_media_systems/5_x/5_2/dms/release/notes/dms52rn.html#wp180130
    CSCso78514 - DOCU1 - stay uploading menu forever if add a media size > 2G in Media Library
    Description:
    Using the local file option to add a media asset that is larger than 2G causes the upload
    menu to remain open indefinitely.
    Work Around:
    None. This is a browser limitation. We recommend that you upload a file that is smaller than 2G
    and that you use an external server for large files.
    On a Side note:
    For a video content file at 2GB or above, Depending on how the video was encoded this
    file size could represent anywhere from 1-4 hours of video.  However, most
    organizations have implemented a best practice segmenting videos down to much
    smaller duration.  Cisco itself recommends video durations of no more than 20 minutes
    due to enduser's attention span.
    If this answers your question, Please take time to mark this
    discussion answered & rate the response.
    Thank You!
    T.

  • Photo File Size and Photoshop processing

    On  previous discussion, Steve Grisetti noted that problems with burning are sometimes associated with photo file size.  The post stated that Photoshop Elements has a batch processing selection that can resize photos all at once.  I when to Photoshop, selected process multiple file, selected source, save in same as source, and resize images 1000.  When I viewed my photos after, about 50 of my photos were now duplicates of other photos For example, I put all my pictures in timeline order prior to doing my video.  If I found a NEW photo after I had already scanned and named the photos, I would place the NEW photo in the picture folder by adjusting accordingly:  1.jpg, 2.jpg 3.1.jpg 3.jpg The 3.1.jpg would be the NEW photo.  Photoshop replaced 3.1jpg with the picture in 3jpg.  Does anyone know how to restore my photos back to the original "3.1jpg"?  The backup is not accessible at this time.

    If I understand you correctly you have been using the renaming feature and the parameters you used caused file1 to be renamed to a pre-existing filename (file2). If this is so then you probably have lost the original file2. An undelete utility may help (try Piriform Recuva).
    For the future when using batch conversion it is good practice to select a new folder for the outputted files.
    It is also good practice to burn all image originals to a CD or DVD immediately after importing from your camera. This way you can always recover originals.
    Here are a couple of screenshots, the first from Elements Organizer and the second from Photoshop Elements. Which one did you use and what parameters did you enter?
    Cheers,
    Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children

  • "File size is too large"

    When I imported the only 4 files in a particular folder (scans of photos) into the Organiser, the message "File size is too large" came up for two of them instead of preview images, although do appear to have been added to the Catalog as their MB size, pixel dimensions and creation date show in the Properies General tab.
    I take it this must relate to pixel count and not the file size per se as the two tifs (13.2 and 13.3 MB but 1792 x 2508 and 2518 x 1798 pixels) are fine, while the two JPGs (12.9 and 30.8 MB and 9616 x 6480 and 7048 x 10376) are the ones without preview images?
    I wasn't aware of this as a problem, so can anybody tell me please, have I just set too low a limit somewhere or is there a real restriction?
    And is this new to PSE6 or something that's been around for a while?
    Thanks, Peter

    I have a 212mb psd file (a panorama).   I have Elements 6.0 and 4 meg RAM, Vista.
    I went through the regedit process as outlined in Adobe Technote kb402760 and upped it to 1,000,000,000.  I would think that would have given enough headroom for my file size.  But it didn't.  I still have the generic "file size too large" on my thumbnails.
    I did note that the tech note had a different location for the Software/Adobe/Elements 6.0/Organizer (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ ) from the location in my file structure.  In fact, this string was listed in at least three places OTHER THAN the one indicated in the Technote.  How likely is it that adding "MaxImageSize" to the Elements 6.0 register locations other than specifically indicated is the reason why the file size capacity was not increased.  Why doesn't Elements show up in the location indicated by the Tech Note?
    NOTE FOR ADOBE:  Why isn't this a more easily accessible option in the user interface?  If I have a large file that slows things down a bit on my thumbnails, that could be my choice.  This artificial constraint built into the regedits that no one goes to is too much like parental controls for 5 year olds.

  • Growing PDF File Size is Pathetic

    Hey all,
    I have been using Acrobat for a number of years but ever since my organization updated me to v9, this growing file size is pathetic! If I move a button on a form, the file size grows 100k. If I add a field, the file size grows 100k. I started with a 58k size form (with about 25 fields), and making a few changes and adding a field or two pushed the size over 1meg?!?!
    Is there ANYTHING that I can do to stop this? (and yes, I have tried "optomizing" the form using all sort of included options, and on mulitple occasions, optomizing the form ADDED size to the file!?)
    And lastly, is Adobe EVER going to fix this??
    Thanks for your time.

    Hi ~Grafiti.
    Thanks for replying.
    I thought that as well. I panic when I add a few fields and it grows to over a meg!
    On other forums, users who have this problem have said that it's Acrobat adding redundant "XML Junk" to the file. They also say that a way to remove it is to save the form as a "XDP", then "hex edit" all the junk out. Yeah...like I am gonna do all that
    Thanks again.

  • Quicktime 7 file size restriction?

    I have some large files shot on HDV and Imported into Final Cut Pro X. I want to use FCP 7 Pro to split them and export in a different format. The larger files 8-10GB appear in QT7 with sound only and a black screen. Smaller files 3-5GB play as expected. My computer is a MacPro 2x2.26 with 20GB RAM. These files WILL play in QTX, but I don't have the export options of QT Pro.
    This leads me to think that there must be a file size restriction for QT Pro 7. Does anyone know what it is?
    FYI the detaile of the files I'm trying to play: HDV 1080i50 1440x18080 (1880x1062) Millions. I have Quicktime Pro 7.6.6. My work-sround has been to split and re-compress in Compressor, but QT7 has always been the quick and dirty solution.

    Hi,
    There is no restrictions on content server side but it will depends on your organization network latency, speed and etc.
    FYI: We have checked in content around 2GB of data so for.
    Thanks,
    Ravinder

  • Photo File Sizes & Formats in iPhoto 6

    I have iPhoto 4. I tried importing 3 files of 270 MB each. iPhoto imported one, but choked on the other two. I then tried importing one of the "rejects," but the result was the same. I read, somewhere, that iPhoto can't handle file sizes of more than 20MB. Is this true of iP 6?
    Also, I've read that iP can only manage .jpg files. The 3 files I tried to import are .tif files. So, can iP 6 manage .tif files?
    I'm unhappy with iPhoto's automatic organization features & other issues & thought of upgrading to iP 6, but if it can't handle those file sizes & .tif, at least, I need to look for another image manager.

    Alexandra:
    iPhoto 6 now has the option, in it's Advanced Preferences pane, of not copying files into its library folder but only using alias files, small files that point to the location of the original files. I've created several Tutorials to assist users in converting over to an alias based library.
    Moving the library to an alternate volume is very easy to do. Just copy it intact to that volume, making sure ownership and permissions are correct on the volume, and the launch iPhoto with the Option key depressed. You'll then be given an option to create a new library or find the current one. Navigate to the new volume and select the moved library. Once you're sure it's working correctly you can delete the one in your User/Pictures folder.
    The alias system lets a PB user put the source files on an external volume and operate normally. If the PB goes traveling then you will be limited to viewing just the thumbnails up to a certain size, adding comments and keywords (with the Command-I info pane), creating and moving albums. You won't be able to edit, view slideshows, move photos to albums, etc. Any photo you've edited while the volume was mounted will be viewable in full with the volume unmounted as the edited version is saved in full in the library on the PB.
    iPhoto is compatible with tiff, psd, gif, jpg, .mov video files, png, bmp, and more.
    To save a photo to another format you will have to export out of iPhoto. Any keywords added in iPhoto will not go with it as they are written to a data file and not the file itself. Most of the EXIF data from a camera is saved, at least when converted to a tiff file. This ISO speed and lens data is lost. Conversion to png format does lose all of the EXIF data.

  • IPhoto '08 automatically reduces file sizes

    I am using iPhoto to organize and edit my portfolio. I am preparing to print, and noticed that my edited files were reduced from 3MB to 76KB. The detail and resolution are all shot, and the prints will turn out poorly. Why are the file sizes being reduced so much, and is there anything I can do about it? I need to print with the highest resolution possible.

    Well that's rather a whole lot different.
    If you have cropped and edited, then , depending on how much you removed from the photo, then I could see a file ending at 650KB - extreme, but that 10 times large than you mentioned in your first post.
    Old Toad - who's well known round there here parts - ran some tests a couple of years ago. He reckoned that the level of compression applied by iPhoto was roughly equivalent to 8 on Photoshop's scale of 12.
    Regards
    TD

Maybe you are looking for

  • Selecting frames in a stack...

    I understand that when you have a stack of frames on top of each other you can cycle through them by Command Clicking on the Mac. But is it only possible to move a selected frame that is buried beneath a load of other frames by clicking and dragging

  • Hi! I am connected to my Airport Extreme Graphite but no internet

    Has any body suffered excellent wifi connectivity, Full cable broadband function but no internet. If I plug straight into modem no worries Network shows excellent wifi signal LEDs on graphite doing their stuff pc connectivity lights on motorolla mode

  • Order Import program run very slow

    Hi I use Order Import program to create sale order from tables interface.But it run very slow,about two hours for one record. How can i do it run fast? Thanks

  • Custom serizlizer.

    I write a my own class - serializer and deserializer. This is serializer for example for java.lang.Double class. I want to use this serializer for all Parameters of Double class. Is there a way to do this without writing maping in deployment descript

  • Fade During Shuffle?

    Is there a fade in/out option when playing the 30G ipod on shuffle? Dell Dimension 4700   Windows XP