Os x mavericks ping latency

hi;
i have a problem about ping latency on os x mavericks. my product is mbp retina 13 inch late 2012 and i have made 10 tests on each platform which are mavericks 10.9.2, win 7 64bit with bootcamp on same device and win 7 64 bit on another laptop (pc) production year is 2011. i have closed all the background and internet using applications on all platforms and used only the browsers. browsers have no extensions and add ons and latest versions... used same wifi modem which supports a/b/g/n... here are the results
each following 10 tests on flash based speedtest on same server:
               osx safari                       : min: 14ms avr:16ms
               osx chrome                    : min: 12 ms avr: 14ms
win 7 x64 (bootcamp) chrome       :min: 10 ms avr: 11ms
        win 7 x64 (pc) chrome           : min: 9ms avr: 11ms
each following 10 tests on html 5 based speedtest on same server
               osx safari                         : min 65ms avr:67ms
               osx chrome                      : min 64 ms avr:66ms
win 7 x64 (bootcamp) chrome        : min 62ms avr:63ms
       win 7 x64 (pc) chrome            : min 60ms avr:62ms
if there is no unknown problem or setting, if these are objective results i want to congratulate the bootcamp team and windows engineering team. i say nothing to os x team because they make their own software for their own hardware and here are the results...

look my friend osx is apple's software and macbook pro is apple's hardware but when you compare the results another software (win7) makes better scores on same hardware.also win 7 has better score on another 1 year older hardware.... after lots of tests i saw that this ping difference is stable and permanent. isnt that a problem for apple and os x team????

Similar Messages

BT Infinity Connection Issue/ frequent ping latenc...

Hi. I'm getting frequent latency over past few month. had Already spoken to agencies about the issue, but no reslovation appeared. So, hopefully, I can get some answer here. Btw, I already tried to switch between channels, reset to factory setting, turn off 5Ghz, it still doesn't work.
The ping latency happen randomly almost everyday in certain times of a day, last around 10 minutes. I got some proves showing the situation exactly at that time.

Can you run this checker and post back a screen shot of the results
http://www.dslchecker.bt.com/adsl/adslchecker.welcome
and use this speed tester then carry out the further diagnostics and post back a screen shot of all the results including your IP profile for up and down. This test must be done with a wired connection.
http://speedtest.btwholesale.com/
if you have a Homehub 5 can you also post the stats from 1-12 by logging onto the homehub management pages then troubleshooting > helpdesk. http://bthomehub.home/
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

[WRT54GL]Ping(Latency) to my router via WiFi :/

Hi,
I've wireless network in my flat.
I have seen that my ping(latency) is higher.
Earlier my ping was <1ms.
I have changed system to Windows 7 and protection to Eset Smart Security 4 Home Edition. Now I mostly get ping to my router 1ms, sometimes is higher(to 83 ms!).
I don't have any trojans, viruses on my notebook.
I have checked my Hijackthis Log - nothing wrong, did scan - nothing wrong.
I have tried to change channel. I have changed my channel from 11 to 4.
I have tried another channels also. Always the same!
I don't what I should do with it.
My router is Linksys WRT54GL.
Here is ping by CMD to my router:
Ping to the most popular service in my country:
Changing channel didn't help.
I haven't viruses. I have scanned my computer today and checked Hijackthis log - NOTHING.
I have Windows 7.
Here is something about my neighbours WLAN'sMy WLAN is Jajco)
What should I do?
I'm waiting for your replies.
Please help.
I'm waiting for your reply.
Message Edited by PenrynHD on 12-31-2009 10:16 AM
Message Edited by PenrynHD on 12-31-2009 10:16 AM

When you login to the setup page of your Wireless Router, under the sub tab of Wireless you need to click on "Advance Wireless Settings" and below Change the Beacon Interval to 50,Change the Fragmentation Threshold to 2201,Change the RTS Threshold to 2202 and Click on Save Settings. And let the Wireless Channel on your Router be set to 11.
Now see if you can locate your Wireless Network and attempt to connect...Once Connected to your Wireless Network now you can try to ping from your computer.

Ping Latency Getting Worse

Hi how do I report a Ping Latency issue that is worsening week b week and slowing down what was a rwasonbly fast Broadband in a countryside village?
Currently I am experiencing via BT Wholesale tester and following all the advice/rules a figure of around 148.2
It used to be consistently under 50.0
Who sorts this oput and fixes the problem please ?

mrchew007 wrote:
go on give me a clue where to start on all that haha
Hi there,
If you view this Youtube video, it will explain how to run a windows traceroute
I hope this info helps.

Ping/latency issues.

I've recently had my line upgraded from a 500k to a 2500k ip profile, and for a short period of time it worked great, consistent speeds etc. Roughly a week ago my ip profile was lowered to 2000k, at which point I suffered frequent broadband connection drop out, phone call after phone call ensued and now my improved ip profile has returned however I am receiving in excess of 300ms ping (according to several different online testers) which has rendered almost every online application useless. Any ideas?
P.S I recently had an engineer to run teests on the line and he reported no faults, I don't understand the problem.

chris6273 wrote:
Hmm i've never made anything worse (as far as ping/latency) issues are concerned by restarting my router (Even though I get a 15ms ping so I wouldn't know). The only thing (which I know of) that will be disrupted by restarting your router is the DLM but that shouldn't do anything over 1 restart.
A hub reset will also force dynamic IP setting from the RAS, most if not all ping issues are to do with which RAS you are connected to, and the traffic on the backhaul.
High latency can be experienced at level 32 interleave, noticeable especially on gaming.
Dynamic Line Management runs constantly and only changes the connection if it is "flapping"...
A re-sync makes no changes to line configuration, other than to sync at the highest possible rate for the line condition.

Ping/Latency Issues (BT Infinity 2 + HH5)

Since the 8th of December I have been getting random ping spikes from 20ms (normal) to 600ms (unusable) and it's making online game not possible.
Does anyone else have this issue and is there a fix?
I have tried power-cycling the hub (HH5) and sitting closer to the hub (wifi) and it makes no difference.
It happens on both WIRED and WIRELESS.

Hi
Don't switch the hh5 on / off two often as this could make the connection worse.
Sounds like the dlm (the dreeded line managent) has already interleaved the line & added impluse noise protection that will cause the increase in ping / lantency & reduce speeds.
Personnally I raise another fault & see if the line checks come back with anything that might need an openreach visit.
https://www.bt.com/consumerFaultTracking/public/faults/reporting.do?pageId=21
Also check if there is anything up locally with openreach's new checker tool.
http://www.homeandwork.openreach.co.uk/problems-with-your-phone-or-broadband/search.aspx
If the test come back with no fault found, then possibly research using a openreach modem with the hh5 or get a 3rd party non-bt all-in-one.
Happy Xmax/ hoildays dispite the connection mischief.

Slow ping latency with Time Machine

Time Machine router is slowing ping speeds substantially over the last few months, now it is getting ridiculous. Using speedtest.net I get ping readings averaging 998ms when it used to be 30ms.
A direct Ethernet connection from Time Machine also has slow pings, yet when I bypass Time Machine and connect directly from the cable modum to iMac the speed ping tests are the same. TC is slowing ping activity and it is frustrating. Could this have something to do with DNS address changing for ISP?

A direct Ethernet connection from Time Machine also has slow pings, yet when I bypass Time Machine and connect directly from the cable modum to iMac the speed ping tests are the same. TC is slowing ping activity and it is frustrating. Could this have something to do with DNS address changing for ISP?
As I read that sentence it says pings are poor on the TC (not TM that is software on the computer). And when I do direct cable modem "ping tests are the same." Same as the TC? Sorry can you please clarify the English.
If it has something to do with DNS ping by IP and not URL name.
ie first ping an address by name.. please copy and paste the result here.
Then ping by IP, that will avoid using dns. Copy and paste the result here.
Then ping the identical address by name and IP direct to the cable modem. Copy and paste the result here.
Then ping the TC direct. Use a traceroute command to the URL you pinged (one that is important to you and is causing issues due to slow speed.)

Very High Ping/Latency

Good Evening,
For 4-5 weeks, I have been getting very high pings (>1500ms) this occurs randomly throughout the day and night.
I have reported a fault and have been told this is normal for peak times.... however they will request a switch over to Fast Path from Interleave.
Now I'm no Rocket scientist but >1500ms ping in an area with only 200 houses on my exchange IS NOT normal, nor is it even remotely acceptable that i'm told it is!!
Having browsed the web with this IP (my 1st hop) "217.47.106.122", I find many others with EXACTLY the same issue.
Please can someone confirm there is an issue with the above address..
My Area Code is 01851 (Isle of Lewis).
I am aware there is ongoing work to install infinity on Lewis this summer, yet I haven't been informed of any dissruptions.
If I was a betting man I'd say many user's have been rerouted and now as a result is being overloaded.. an oversight no doubt.
Please either confirm this is or at the very least "may" be the case..
Regards
Dan

Looking good!
Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.246.103]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms BTHomeHub.home [192.168.1.254]
2 1385 ms 1426 ms 1419 ms 217.47.106.122
3 783 ms 796 ms 847 ms 217.47.106.193
4 1024 ms 1004 ms 1069 ms 213.1.69.78
5 1162 ms 1212 ms 1255 ms 31.55.165.102
6 1356 ms 1359 ms 973 ms 31.55.165.75
7 834 ms 847 ms 906 ms 31.55.165.107
8 1001 ms 1029 ms 1077 ms 109.159.250.52
9 1218 ms 1278 ms 1222 ms core1-te0-13-0-17.ealing.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.42]
10 1092 ms 703 ms 626 ms peer2-xe0-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.254.102]
11 644 ms 738 ms 708 ms 194.74.65.42
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 1204 ms 1183 ms 1291 ms ae0.er01.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk [132.185.254.93]
14 1228 ms * 690 ms 132.185.255.165
15 888 ms 904 ms 909 ms fmt-vip132.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk [212.58.246.103]
Trace complete.

Different ping/latency with 2.4ghz and 5ghz

Today i installed my new TC, last model.
I usually had: 2.4ghz band, ping 4ms, download rate 40Mbps.
Now i have a very absurd situation
With Safari
if i use the 2.4 ghz--> ping 4ms, download rate 40Mbps
if i use the 5 ghz--> ping 32ms, download rate 96Mbps
With Chrome
if i use the 2.4 ghz--> ping 4ms, download rate 40Mbps
if i use the 5 ghz--> ping 4ms, download rate 96Mbps
How is it possible?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Hi Vishal,
No problem!! we are here to help you!!
Leo's link is like the bible!! please go through that and let us know if u have any questions.. we will be happy to answer that!!
and this link will give u the details on the nut shell
https://www.wireless.att.com/support_static_files/KB/KB3895.html
Regards
Surendra

Ping is better on bootcamp than mavericks

hi;
i have a problem about ping latency on os x mavericks. my product is mbp retina 13 inch late 2012 and i have made 10 tests on each platform which are mavericks 10.9.2, win 7 64bit with bootcamp on same device and win 7 64 bit on another laptop (pc) production year is 2011. i have closed all the background and internet using applications on all platforms and used only the browsers. browsers have no extensions and add ons and latest versions... used same wifi modem which supports a/b/g/n... here are the results
each following 10 tests on flash based speedtest on same server:
               osx safari                       : min: 14ms avr:16ms
               osx chrome                    : min: 12 ms avr: 14ms
win 7 x64 (bootcamp) chrome       :min: 10 ms avr: 11ms
        win 7 x64 (pc) chrome           : min: 9ms avr: 11ms
each following 10 tests on html 5 based speedtest on same server
               osx safari                         : min 65ms avr:67ms
               osx chrome                      : min 64 ms avr:66ms
win 7 x64 (bootcamp) chrome        : min 62ms avr:63ms
       win 7 x64 (pc) chrome            : min 60ms avr:62ms
if there is no unknown problem or setting, if these are objective results i want to congratulate the bootcamp team and windows engineering team. i say nothing to os x team because they make their own software for their own hardware and here are the results...

Hi I have run both 7 and 8 under bootcamp with osx 10.7 and 8 under 10.8.5.
I was able to use Win 7 for work, but found that Win 8 was too slow. Hard disk write speeds were very bad and I could not keep multiple applications open without the MBP slowing down so as to be unusable.
Both win 8 and 7 were fine for gaming, such as Lara Croft and Skyrim.
Without a doubt I would say that 7 is more stable and runs better under bootcamp.

Windows 7 64 bit wireless latency

I have been struggling with an odd issue effecting openvpn on Windows 7 64-bit wireless. Performance is very sluggish and my ping latency is very high across the openvpn connection when compared to WinXP wireless and Win7 wired connections.
This appears to be an issue with the Intel WiFi Link 1000 BGN wireless card. No firmware updates are available from Lenovo or Intel for the card.
Average ping latency is 30ms across vpn from WinXP in both wireless and wired as well as Win7 wired. But goes to 130ms+ from Win7 wireless connection! This translates to a remote session that is like working through molasses. Stepping through code in Visual Studio on a remote machine from the Windows 7 machine when on a wireless connection has so much lag time it becomes unusable. Making the remote connection on a wired ethernet or WinXP wireless N is as responsive as sitting in front of the remote machine.
Appears that my MTU is optimal for my internet connection. I tested and found that 1480 is the minimum size packet where I can ping and return a "Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set." response. So I am leaving my MTU at 1500 on both wired and wireless on Win7 machine.
So far I have (I believe) ruled out the following:
Firewalls - both windows and at router - have turned off both with no effect
Antivirus - no change with it deactivated
Router settings - put laptop in DMZ and no change
MTU - tested 1500 as optimal
Thinkpad drivers and BIOS - all latest
Has anyone else run into issues with this Intel 1000 wireless card?
Thanks,
Jeff
ThinkPad Edge 14 with Intel 1000 BGN wireless NIC
.NET Software Developer
ThinkPad T440s (20AQ005TUS) | ThinkPad ThinkPad T430 (2342CTO) | Lenovo H430 (25582AU) | ThinkPad X230 (2306CTO)
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I had a real problem with wireless performance on multiple ThinkPads with Win7 until I realized there is a new (or maybe changed implementation) power setting in Win7 which was affecting it.
If you go into Control Panel -> Power Options and click "Change plan settings" for your current power plan.
On the next screen click on "Change advanced power settings"
On the next screen expand "Wireless Adapter Settings" and then "Power Saving Mode"
Make sure it is set to Maximum Performance.
Not sure if this will help your particular problem but hope it does.

Ping Issues

Hi,
I have a significant problem with the ping/latency of my broadband connection. Whenever my connection is being used by more than one person (even just loading a webpage, not necessarily streaming/gaming) the ping skyrockets, sometimes to 1-2 seconds. Obviously this is a problem, since I pay a significant amount of money to have a stable and usable connection.
I can also tell if the neighbours are playing games/streaming, as the quality of my connection decreases dramatically.
Any help or advice would be useful.

I'm currently on wireless, but the problem also seems to manifest when connected directly to the hub by ethernet cable.
According to the btspeedtester, I have 1.95 mbps download and 0.36 upload with a ping of 66ms currently.
Just testing an additional active connection, at the moment I'm getting (numbers are DL/UL/Ping):
109 0.31 308
129 0.28 257
133 0.30 261
Although, as I said, it is not uncommon to get ping > 900ms.
ADSL Line Status
Connection Information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
3 days, 13:34:38
Downstream:
2.594 Mbps
Upstream:
448 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
Unknown or no mode configured
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
7.9 dB / 18.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
60.9 dB / 31.5 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
18.4 dBm / 12.4 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
453611 / 421
CRC Events (Down/Up):
956 / 41
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up):
10157 / 36
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
131481 / 2635

ICMP, outbound Ping on Azure VM

I'd like to use outbound Ping and Traceroute on an Azure VM. These are outbound requests to another server outside of Azure.
Is the Azure firewall blocking outbound ICMP traffic so that Ping is completely blocked?
Can someone please confirm that there is no way for me to Ping another server from a Windows Azure VM?

Hi Shannon,
Instead of using ping, you can use
Psping (or nmap/tcping/portqry/telnet etc.) to test connectivity to a specific port.
For example, if the public port of my RDP endpoint is 50791 -
C:\>psping cljun27ws12.cloudapp.net:50791
PsPing v1.0 - ping, latency, bandwidth measurement utility
Copyright (C) 2012 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com
TCP connect to 137.117.73.209:50791:
5 iterations (warmup 1) connecting test:
Connecting to 137.117.73.209:50791 (warmup): 87.26ms
Connecting to 137.117.73.209:50791: 81.35ms
Connecting to 137.117.73.209:50791: 89.43ms
Connecting to 137.117.73.209:50791: 82.92ms
Connecting to 137.117.73.209:50791: 84.83ms
TCP connect statistics for 137.117.73.209:50791:
Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Minimum = 81.35ms, Maxiumum = 89.43ms, Average = 84.63ms
And while ICMP is blocked externally, if the guest OS firewall in the VM is configured to allow ICMP, you can ping between VMs in the same cloud service or virtual network.
And as Hari mentioned, you can ping between on-premise and a VM if the connectivity is happening with Azure Connect, or with a Virtual Network Gateway.
Thanks,
Craig

High latency problems with HH5/BT inifinty 2

Hello all!
I'm not really tech savy, so will explain this as best as possible. I'm basically having constantly high latency with it spiking for no reason, even though all my speeds (up and down) are fast and fine. This is also a wired connection running Cata6 cables.
When I first had my internet installed I was running around 18ms constantly. After around 6 months or so, this then increased to around 35ms. Now its normally running around 45ms, with it constantly spiking for no reason what so ever (over 100ms). I've repeatedly reset the router (both through the reset button and just unplugging the power cable). Both my download speeds and upload speeds are both great (will post the test results at the end). I've even restored factory settings.
I've had this latest speed & problem for now around 5 days and I can't clear it with anyway I know how. I called the tech team yesterday and was on the line for over thirty minutes with me explaining the problem to them, but the person on the other end was extremely rude and unhelpful (pretty useless being honest). He reset the router from his end and said there was no problems with it and that BT won't help me any further. He went on to say thats just the internet for you, which I know it isn't. In particular, its mostly affecting my online gaming. I know its nothing to do with the games servers as I house share with a person who's ISP is Virgin Media and they have zero problems playing the same game as me, even though their internet speeds aren't as fast as mine. I know it's not just the system I use. The problem is the same with my laptop, PC, smartphones, PS4 and smart TV.
It's now getting to a point when its becoming pointless having BT installed and its getting near the last straw where I really am just going to cut the service off as its awful.
Does anyone by anychance know how to solve this? If it also helps I live in London, East to be exact.
My speeds are:- Download Speed (Mbps): 73.11
Upload Speed (Mbps): 11.63
Ping Latency (ms): 43.00
Thanks to anyone that replies.

Forgot to mention that other users of the hub5a have recommeded setting the DCHP to 21 days , which I think is the max to see if that helps?
Although its does sound like somethings up if its dropping line connnection.
Have you been through the usual checks & tests rigmarole to rule out an openreach vist?
https://www.bt.com/consumerFaultTracking/public/faults/reporting.do?pageId=21
http://www.homeandwork.openreach.co.uk/problems-with-your-phone-or-broadband/search.aspx
17070 quiet line test
https://support.zen.co.uk/kb/Knowledgebase/Performing-a-Quiet-Line-Test {How to guide}
Might highlight something thats not the usual hh5a mischief.

CM6.1 Cluster expansion Germany -- Dubai 125 - 160ms ping

Have a cluster of 2 machines running communications manager 6.1 running in Germany.
Have the request to expand our VoIP services to new remote office in Dubai. Based on all information, I need a latency time of max 80 ms roundtrip for a cluster syncronisation/expansion and the respective login/logout services to work properly. I find all kinds of white papers but gain no real experiences from these papers. Ping latency is anywhere between 125 and 160 roundtrip currently. Goal is to keep the same DB and the same numbering plan throughout the orga. Does anyone have some real life scenarios or could someone suggest the best way to effectively support roughly 30 phone expansion to Dubai with either a cluster expansion or a separate CM with a DB sync to the Germany office. Do we even need a CM down there or can we simply place a 2811 and have it sync/get its information from the CM in Germany, the telephones can then run in SRST mode if the connection drops.

I've just finished a project where my firm opened two new offices at the same time in the western United States. Time was not on our side and we were not able to get the hardware we needed for CUCM in time for the opening. To meet the "go live" date we ended up having to register 50+ phones across the corporate network to an old CallManager cluster in our Brussels office -- about 325 ms rtt. This worked extremely well. If we hadn't told the firm what we were doing they wouldn't have known.
Based upon your description I don't think you need a cluster member in your new office. For 30 phones I believe you'd be fine with an ISR running SRST and registering the phones to the cluster in Germany as a matter of course.
I wish you all the best.

Os x mavericks ping latency

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for