OS7.0.3 is much better

Finally the ipod app doesn't crash on me around 4-8 times a day. It appears like the unstability of the first OS7 update has finally gone down. My only complaint at this point is when you go to rate a track you are listening to. When I touch the album art, the song information is replaced with the rating. It appears like the ROI for selecting a rating is extremely small. I flip back and forth from song info to rating many time before I finally get to rate the song. This feature was working much better with the first two releases but this current one seems to have changed the ROI for the rating.
Yes I'll submit a feedback as well. I just wanted to post that the current OS release is a big improvement at least for me.

kesajen wrote:
Does anyone know how to go back to 3.1.3? I have 16GB 3GS, running iOS4, and my phone runs VERY slow!! It's so frustrating. I don't really care about multi tasking, or any other goodie that came with 4. I want to go back to the old OS.
Any help out there?
I know how but can't say

Similar Messages

Please help! I should be getting much better performance! What am I doing wrong?

Hi, there!
I've recently started using After Effects CC and I am getting extremely poor performance, especially given my machine specs (or so I believe).
Everything is very slow, including the actual software interface. Even with the Live Update switched off:
- Moving components on the actual composition view is practically impossible: click, drag, wait about 15seconds, release click and it has moved somewhat in the general direction required, but not even to the place the mouse stopped.
- Scrubbing doesn't work at all, even after the render bar on the timeview is already fully green.
- Standard preview (spacebar) can never play at realtime. The only way to play footage at realtime is to use RAM preview (numpad 0), but even then it takes ages to render small parts (10seconds of footage, takes anywhere between 5 and 10 minutes).
It's enfuriating! I am so convinced that my machine should perform SO much better than this!
I have tried everything that I can think of and everything that I have found on this forum and others through out the internet. Spent the last week googling this issue and have not made much improvement!
I have even checked the raytracker_supported_cards.txt file actually included the GeForce GTX 590. It does.
Any help anyone can provide would be much appreciated, cos I am stumped. Many thanks!
The following are the specs of my pc and the settings of my After Effects (relevant settings and settings I have changed from default):
PC
Components
Comments
Case
Cooler Master HAF X
PSU
Silverstion ST1500 (1500W)
Motherboard
Asus Rampage IV Formula
CPU
Intel Core i7-3960X (6 physical /12 virtual cores) @ 3.3GHz
CPU Cooler
Noctua NH-D14 SE2011
RAM
4x4GB G.Skill Ripjaws
GPUs
2x Zotac Gefore GTX 590 3GB (4 physical GPUs with 1.5GB RAM each)
Latest drivers installed
SSD
Crucial Technology M4 256GB
Used for OS, Applications and AE cache
HD1
Seagate Barracuda 2TB SATAIII 7200RPM
HD2
Western Digital VelociRaptor HDD 10,000RPM
Monitor
Samsung SyncMaster 305T (2560x1600)
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate
All up to date
After Effects
CC
Updated to latest version 12.2.1
After Effects
Preferences Heading
Setting
Set to/
Showing
Comments
General
Allow Scripts to Write Files and Acces Network
Ticked
Don't think this has anything to do with it, but it is something I changed from the default values.
Previews
Adaptive Resolution
1/8
Show Internal Wireframes
Unticked
Zoom Quality
Faster
Color Management Quality
Faster
Previews/GPU Information
Fast Draft
Available
Texture Memory
1115MB
Maximum allowed
Ray-tracing
GPU
OpenGL version
2.1.2
Even though my GPUs (GTX590) are capable of OpenGL 4.4
OpenGL Share Model
3.0
CUDA Driver Version
6.3
CUDA Devices
4
followed by "(GeForce GTX590, GeForce GTX590, GeForce GTX590, GeForce GTX590)"
CUDA Current Usable Memory
1150MB
CUDA Maximum Usable Memory
1500MB
Display
Harware Accelerate Comosition, Layer and Footage Panels
Ticked
Media and Disk Cache
Enable Disk Cache
Ticked
Maximum Disk Cache Size
60GB
Cache Folder
C:\AEcache
Conformed Media Database Folder
C:\AEcache
Conformed Media Cache Folder
C:\AEcache
Write XMP IDs to Files Import
Ticked
Create Layer Markers from Footage XMP Metadata
Ticked
Video Preview
Output Device
None
Auto-save
Automatically Save Projects
Unticked
Memory & Multiprocessing
Installed RAM
16GB
RAM reserved for other applications
6GB
RAM shared by AE
10GB
Reduce cahce size when system is low on memory
Unticked
Render Multiple Frames Simulatenously
Ticked
Only for Render Queue, not for RAM Preview
Unticked
Installed CPUs (processor cores)
12
CPUs Reserved for other applications
6
RAM allocation per background CPU
1.5 GB
Acutal CPUs that will be used
6
Other Options
Pixel Correction
OFF
Fast Preview
Adaptive Resolution
Have played with it in Fast Draft too, but rendering was quicked on Adaptive Resolution.
This is because for A.R. it uses multiprocessing, but for Fast Draft M.P. is disable (incompatible mode, it says).
Renderer
Classic 3D
Thanks again!

Hi, Mylenium,
Thanks for your prompt reply, I'm afraid it hasn't helped. I don't see anything wrong in my device manager.
I have also gone and updated every driver, especially the motherboard chipset and the Sata Intel Rapid Storage Technology driver.
Unfortunately, this hasn't made any difference.
Any other suggestions?
Many thanks in advance!
Hugo

For the 24 inchers...how much better is the ATI over the NVIDIA?

Well, I just purchased the new 24in IMac at 3.06 ghz with its basic options....4gb ram, TB hard drive and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 video card. My friend, coincedentally bought the same one just a few days later, however its refurbished, has the (only) other video card option, I believe the ATI Radeon HD 4850. My friend has relentlessly teased me saying their IMac is "better" than mine. Now this doesn't all bother that much, however, according to the apple website, at only $50 more for the "better" ATI video card....how much better is it actually? Will the performance be that noticable in applications such as After Effects and Motion? If anybody can clear up the $50 difference and as to why that is, I'd appreciate it.

I don't know how much detail you want in the answer, but Apple has basic comparisons between the GT 130 and the 4850. Go here
http://www.apple.com/imac/features.html
and click on +View the iMac Graphics Performance Chart+ link under +Fast, faster, or fastest?+
On the plus side (for your choice), Apple seems to be working more closely with NVIDIA these days. That may (or may not) be beneficial when Snow Leopard is released.

It seems as if Pages 09 is a much better proposition than the last current pages5. How can I get hold of pages09. When I tried before I wasn't able to download it.

I have a new iMac. I am in the process of having to put together an 8 page newsletter every month with photos and texts and some tables. I am having trouble with the current Pages changing things as I work through the document. Is there a way I can get the older Pages 09 version which I read is so much better. I tried once before but my I Mac would not accept the download.

If you never had iWork '09, buy it extremely cheaply from Amazon, just make sure to update it to v4.3.
Peter

How much better is the new Graphic Card?

How much better is the new graphic card compared to the X1600 256mb in the older 2.33 Core 2 duo's? Im a gamer and was wondering if there is gonna be a big difference or just a small difference?

Hi,
according to this there seems to be a big advantage: http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/graphics.html
(Scroll down to the bottom).
Regards
Stefan

Which is much better for me, MacBook Pro 13" Retina Display or MacBook Air 13"?

Hi! I'm a High School Student, and I really need help in choosing the right MacBook. So which is which?
I'm really confused in choosing which MacBook suites. I have been researching about the specs of each MacBooks; some websites say "MacBook Pro is much better" while the others "MacBook Air is better than the Pro". I'm totally confused! And PLEASE HELP ME!
Here is what I need for a laptop:
*I will use it for Editing Videos and Photos
*sTORAGE for my Documents! (Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Adobe)
*PRINTING documents and stuff
*Great Quality for Movies, Videos, and Music
*GAMES!!! (Assasin's Creed, Sims, etc.)
*Other Apllications
*Storage for my stuff
*Best performance for INTERNET, SOCIAL SITES, & ENTERTAINMENT
*Handy and Easy to use
*Lightweight ('cause I have to bring it to school for reports and I have to bring i to to different places for conventions or seminars)
*STORAGE for my Photographs, Music, Movies (edited and downloaded)
*Long Lasting Batteries
*FAST and QUICK
I'm really confused, which shal I choose: MacBook Pro because it has the best performance or MacBook Air because it is very convenient.
I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IF YOU HELP ME.
Message was edited by: Samkeyness

Unfortunately, you mentioned "GAMES!!!" - no Mac notebook is a good gaming machine (sad but true). For everything else, however, I would recommend a MacBook Pro (Retina or non-Retina - whichever you prefer, although my preference is for the non-Retina: it lacks the portability of the Retina but is user upgradeable whereas the Retina 13" machine is limited to 8GB of RAM, soldered onto the logic board, and a 'fixed' storage space).
I haven't looked at the specs but I'm assuming that the Retina model would be only slightly heavier than the Air. But it would out-perform the Air should you desire to try games with it.
Good luck - we get these "what shall I buy" questions all the time but, in the end, it's your decision.
Clinton

My palm calendar wont open after Lion download. Palm is so much better than ical, is it not going to work w/ Lion?

Palm calendar won't open now that I've downloaded Lion. Palm is so much better than ical. Is there a fix?

I miss Palm Desktop for Mac. The integration of contacts, to-dos, notes, appointments, etc. was great. I stopped using it about a year ago when I finally sold my Palm Tungsten T and purchased and iPhone 4. iCal etc. work fine for me, but they're not as good as Palm Desktop was.
I also miss Graffiti 1 handwriting recognition. I could write with it as fast and flawlessly as I can write longhand on paper, and nearly as fast as I can type. It was the best for meetings and interviews, since I could write without having to look at the screen. iOS has nothing that comes close; I've gotten used to the onscreen keyboard but it's slower, I make far more mistakes, and I have to keep my eye on the screen while typing.
As others have pointed out, Palm Desktop was written for PPC processors. Lion does not include and cannot run Rosetta, which is the emulation environment which allowed Intel processors to run PPC code. So Palm Desktop will not run on a Mac running Lion.
I was syncing to my Palm Tungsten T under Snow Leopard (and using Palm Desktop) with no troubles at all. There are third-party sync options available, but they're all kludgy and unreliable compared to Palm's own syncing. Again, though, the Palm software for syncing was written for PPC processors and so won't run on any Mac booting into Lion.

Just how much better is nattres than compressor in converting pal - NTSC?

I am on the verge of buying the Nattres plugin but before i do i would like to know how much better it is than compressor. I did some test with compressor and the results are unacceptable. I have to send some stock footage to America from here in South Africa. The footage im trying to convert is half Betacam half DVCPROHD.
Thanks
Andre
I have posted this thread in the compressor forum but didnt quite get the answer i was looking for, although it was helpful

I don't think Natress is over $75.
Natress is the only plug-in or software that has given us consistent results.
It also does PAL to NTSC or NTSC to PAL.
Rendering can take a while depending on the length of your sequence.
Edit in PAL and when you are done duplicate your sequence and make an NTSC version. You can then avoid having to convert footage that doesn't end up in your final sequence.

How much better is Logic Pro?

Would it be a real disadvantage to get logic express over Logic, i mean has it still got all the loops, synths, drum machines and actual audio recording capabilities?
Thanks

Pro is much better imo, but depending on your budget and needs you might not need it. What I did was to purchase Logic Express first, learned it, liked it and then upgraded from Logic Express to Logic Pro once I found that I wanted the plugins and some options found in pro, this winter. That's a good route since it doesn't cost much more (Express$ + Upgrade$ ~= Pro$) and allowed me to have a much better idea for why I wanted Pro. I might have chosen not to buy it if I found so, but I did (and a the extra time accumulating money helped :-))

While updating iphone, itune gave me error of 1015 which tells that my iphone is much better than from which that i am updating. But now my iphone is still in restoring mode how i can resolve this problem.please tell me

while updating iphone, itune gave me error of 1015 which tells that my iphone is much better than from which that i am updating. But now my iphone is still in restoring mode how i can resolve this problem.please tell me

I just had the same problem with my iphone, only thing i could do was completely restore factory settings, lost a bunch of pics and contacts in the process... hope you have better luck than me

After updating to iOS 6.0 everything is a mess. i cant get in my CO app game, imessages undelivered, worst of all i cant connect to Apps store. If u were able to solve this pls let me know. or if possible to return to old OS 5.1 that is much better. HELP!

after updating to iOS 6.0 everything is a mess. i cant get in my CO app game, imessages undelivered, worst of all i cant connect to Apps store. If u were able to solve this pls let me know. or if possible to return to old OS 5.1 that is much better. HELP!

I had the same experience with a new iPhone 5 that I bought last week. Did not have a chance to measure battery life before the 6.0.2 upgrade installed but I set up my phone exactly like my 4S and immediately started running out of power after short periods. Went to Xmas get together with fully charged 5 and 4S. Heading home the iPhone 5 shut down for low battery and the 4S had 65% power. Both phones had two half phone calls on then and no data usage.
That night I fully charged the iPhone 5 and, without lighting it up, put it on my night table. Next morning I picked it up and looked at battery indicator and I had 42% charge with NO activity!
Tried it again next night and wound up with 37% charge. (Slept longer).
Today I called the carrier and reactivated the 4S. Took the 5 to Apple Store and they kindly gave me choice of new replacement phone or refund. I took the refund. Uniquely, the Apple Store said it was Verizon CDMA phones that were coming back.
The are other strings on this with temporary solutions, but from my experience with 7 firmware changes on an HTC 4G phone the problem will continue because the solution will be hardware caused. We are in the days where RTM means Rush to Market - not Release To Manufacturing.
I fear the only solution is to either wait for the next model (I did not notice a really major change in performance over the 4S in LTE heavy Seattle area) - or switch to another manufacturer.
It might be useful for these forums to indicate if you have a GSM or CDMA phone to see which have more problems.
Discouraged....

Hello i have an iphone 5 it is very slow when i am downloading app my iphone 4 it is much much better are all the iphone 5 are the same or my iphone 5 have problem please

hello i have an iphone 5 it is very slow when i am downloading app my iphone 4 it is much much better are all the iphone 5 are the same or my iphone 5 have problem please????

Thank you for your help are you aware of any apps that will work the iso 4.2.1 system that will let you watch movies on the phone. Also I tried to down load something else the other day and got message that Safari wont let you open this is ther any to see if i have the latest safari on my phone?

N95 Firmware which is much better?

Im just new here and im being careful..which is much better firmware ? v20 or the latest which is v30? thanks for those who will help
Solved!
Go to Solution.

17-Dec-2008 10:47 AM
steleece wrote:
Just by searchin the net, i seen that most people had been able to update there n95-1 to V3 via NSU but when I try there is no update. Ive seen a lot of people saying that v3 is much better and come with rotateme etc..
There never was a V3. The very first firmware version for the N95-1 was V10. Then there were V11, V12, V20, V21 and the latest is V30. There was a V31 released a few weeks back but it was removed almost immediately.
If you can't update to V30 it could be because of either or both of these reasons:
1) You live in a part of the world for which the updated version hasn't yet been translated. For each model there are multiple product codes, each one for a different area and/or mobile network operator.
2) There is an update available for your part of the world but you have a phone supplied by your operator who hasn't yet approved it. Read this page.
Was this post helpful? If so, please click on the white "Kudos!" star below. Thank you!

I have used still photos to make a Quick Time movie using FCE. The DVD made using i-DVD looks somewhat grainy and the motion isn't smooth when played on my TV. Other DVD's I have made play much better and I am wondering if the problem is my Quick Time m

I have used still photos to make a Quick Time movie using FCE. The DVD made using i-DVD looks somewhat grainy and the motion isn’t smooth when played on my TV. Other DVD’s I have made play much better and I am wondering if the problem is my Quick Time movie settings. The Dimensions and size of the problem movie are 1920X1080 and 584 MB respectively, while the movies that play better have Dimensions of 853X480 and are about 1.3 GB in size. Is this the source of my problem and how do I change things for the better.

Are you exporting to QuickTime Movie, or to QuickTime Conversion? For iDVD, you need to export to QuickTime Movie. Exporting to QT Conversion will kill the quality if you are moving the video from FCE to iDVD.
The file size per se makes no difference.
What size (pixel dimensions) are the photos that you put into your 1920x1080 sequence? Also, exactly what are the sequence properties ... is it 1920x1080i60 ... or i50? In North America it should be i60.
853X480 is an odd frame size. Where are you seeing this number? It would appear to be DV-NTSC, which has a frame size of 720x480. Your 1920x1080 frame size would not be DV-NTSC, it would be Apple Intermediate Codec. DV and AIC will look different, for sure.
Also, your quality setting in iDVD can affect the final video. You may want to check that also (in iDVD Preferences > Projects). Set it to Professional Quality if at all possible.

Is WAAS 5 that much better than previous versions?

I have never used Cisco WAAS for wan op (I've used BlueCoat and Silverpeak) and have heard less than complimentary comments on its ease of deployment and overall functionality. I am currently looking to replace my aging Bluecoat environment and am curious about people's opinion of 5.X.
From what I have heard it is night and day different and an overall much better better product.
What are the communities opinions? How does it stack up agianst Riverbed and the other players?

Hi Kenny,
you are asking for community opinion. Working for Cisco I can give you my perspective, I hope that counts as well ;-)
You are right about the day and night difference.
One of the reasons is the completely reworked Central Manager GUI, which is using HTML 5 now. So it can be used on iPads or similar as well. But more important is the Look and Feel and usability of version 5, which is perceived very positive from what I take away in my conversations with customers.
Perhaps the biggest addition to the portfolio is a new redirection technology, AppNav (Application Navigation).
With AppNav you can now do loadbalancing and traffic distribution to a WAAS (WAE/WAVE) cluster more easily and in fine granularity. This means, you can distribute certain networks (Branches) or applications to a certain set of WAAS appliances at ease.
What think needs to be mentioned are Cisco's partnerships with leading IT companies in order to jointly work on Application Optimizers and haveing them certified. Best example, if we are talking about the new version (so true for 4.5 as well) is The Citrix ready certification for ICA optimization.
Others inlcude e.g SAP NetWaver, and Microsoft Protocols ( CIFS/SMB /native v2, (e)MAPI, Video Streaming Server, virtual Windows Appliance on WAAS), ...
Other Highlights:
WAAS Express Version 2. You can run WAAS on your Router as an IOS Feature.
SSL scalabilty at 75.000 concurrent sessions on WAVE 8541.
Cloud solution with vWAAS (virtual WAAS).
Hope that give a first impression,
chris

OS7.0.3 is much better

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for